latest waterfox browser installer files from best downloader Latest waterfox browser installer files from best downloader. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 67ac660be955c410 • Your IP : 188.246.226.140 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. Waterfox. There is no 32-bit version, only 64-bit available as a setup and portable version. Note : Sometimes we are not able to upload all files of Waterfox. This is an old issue from Waterfox replication system. We get the data from the official source, and usually, we have to wait for a couple of days to be able to download them. We tried to notify the author and offer a mirror. Waterfox Review. A Streamlined 64-bit Browser. Waterfox is the brainchild of software developer Alex Kontos, who started building this program in 2011 when he was just 16 years old. At the time 64 bit operating systems were becoming more popular with mainstream users, and Alex was frustrated with the way 32-bit browsers worked on a 64-bit system. Even though 64 bit operating systems could process a lot more information more quickly, 32-bit browsers worked slower on 64 bit systems than they did on 32 bit systems. Using Mozilla's open source software, he created a 64-bit version of Firefox to increase the speed of the browsing experience. Waterfox was one of the first 64 bit browsers widely available on the web and has had a loyal following ever since. By comparison, Mozilla has only just recently released the 64-bit version of Firefox, in December of 2015. MrAlex94, as he is now known on Reddit, originally started the Waterfox project only looking to increase speed. However, the Waterfox project's current focus is user experience and power of choice. This can be seen in many features exclusive to the program: Instead of using Google, Yahoo, or one of the other major search engines which make a profit by tracking your browsing habits, Waterfox partners with the search firm Ecosia. Ecosia is a self-described social business who put the well-being of people and the environment before profit. The ad revenue generated by Ecosia is used to plant trees. Waterfox has no plug-in whitelist or blacklist. This means that the user can install any plug-in, add-on, or extension they want, even unsigned ones. The Waterfox project is also dedicated to the safety of the user's data, and so the Waterfox browser does not collect any data or telemetry information to send back to either Mozilla or the Waterfox project. As far as user experience goes, Waterfox operates very much like Firefox. Any user who is familiar with the Firefox browser should find the interface nearly identical. In fact, the only noticeable difference is the branding. Waterfox also includes all of Firefox's standard enhancements and security options such as private browsing, spellcheck, and tab functionality. It remains entirely open source and customizable to fit each user's needs. Where Waterfox differs from Firefox, aside from the user-empowering points listed above, is that it has additional functionality for those users who are familiar with web development. In addition to being compiled by Intel's C++ compiler, which optimizes speed, there are a number of tools available such as a debugger and style editor. Waterfox has gone through many revisions and updates to keep it current. The most recent version released is Waterfox 46.0, which was just made available in April of 2016. The response to this newest version has been lukewarm at best, and many users are choosing to stay with an older version while the bugs are worked out. Version 46.0 is the first to use the Visual C++ compiler, due to some problems with Intel's compiler, which may account for some of the challenges. Despite this, though, Waterfox is still considered to be an excellent browser for 64-bit users, who are anxiously awaiting the next version. Why You Shouldn’t Use Firefox Forks Like Waterfox, Pale Moon, or Basilisk. Chris Hoffman is Editor-in-Chief of How-To Geek. He's written about technology for over a decade and was a PCWorld columnist for two years. Chris has written for The New York Times, been interviewed as a technology expert on TV stations like Miami's NBC 6, and had his work covered by news outlets like the BBC. Since 2011, Chris has written over 2,000 articles that have been read nearly one billion times---and that's just here at How-To Geek. Read more. Mozilla Firefox is an open source project, so anyone can take its code, modify it, and release a new browser. That’s what Waterfox, Pale Moon, and Basilisk are—alternative browsers based on the Firefox code. But we recommend against using any of them. If You Don’t Like Firefox Quantum, Use Firefox ESR Instead. We like Firefox Quantum, which is faster and more modern than previous releases of Firefox. If you want to keep using your old add-ons that no longer work in Firefox Quantum, we recommend Mozilla’s Firefox Extended Support Release (ESR) instead. Firefox ESR is based on Firefox 52, supports traditional XUL Firefox add-ons and NPAPI plug-ins, and will continue receiving security updates directly from Mozilla until July 2, 2018. Yes, Mozilla has done some things we’re not crazy about. The Mr. Robot “Looking Glass” add-on was ridiculous, and we’re not thrilled about what they’re doing with Cliqz in Germany. But, after taking some deserved public heat, they’ve made policy changes and we’re hopeful they’ll do better in the future. Even if you don’t completely trust some of Mozilla’s business decisions, your browser is just too important to be left to a small community of enthusiasts. We think it’s best to go with a big project with a large number of developers that receives a lot of attention to security. That’s why we recommend against using these smaller Firefox-based browsers, and why we also recommend against using alternative browsers based on Google Chrome. Here are our concerns with some of the more popular Firefox alternatives. Waterfox Is Firefox ESR, But With Slower Security Updates. Waterfox is based on Mozilla Firefox, and it’s probably the most popular alternative browser based on the Firefox code. It made a name for itself by being a 64-bit browser based on the Mozilla Firefox code when Mozilla only offered 32-bit versions. However, Mozilla Firefox is now a 64-bit browser on 64-bit versions of Windows, so that’s not a reason to use Waterfox anymore. Today, Waterfox is based on Firefox ESR. It advertises support for traditional XUL Firefox extensions and NPAPI plug-ins like Java and Silverlight. These are both features of Firefox ESR, so you don’t need to switch to Waterfox to get them. After Firefox ESR reaches end of Life, “a “new” browser will be developed to follow the ethos of Waterfox of customisation and choice”, according to the Waterfox blog. Waterfox also has some other different features. It disables Pocket by default, but you can disable Pocket yourself in Firefox. It won’t send telemetry data to Mozilla, but you can disable that from Options > Privacy & Security > Firefox Data Collection and Use in Firefox. Encrypted Media Extensions (EME), which are required for sites like Netflix, are also disabled by default—and, again, you can disable them yourself in Firefox, if you like. Overall, using Waterfox is basically just like using Firefox ESR and changing a few settings…with one big difference: security updates arrive in Firefox ESR much faster than they do in Waterfox. Whenever Mozilla releases security updates for Firefox ESR, the Waterfox developers have to integrate those updates into Waterfox before delivering them to users. Let’s look at the most recent major release: Mozilla released Firefox 57 on November 14, 2017. Waterfox’s developers released Waterfox 56 that incorporated the security updates found in Firefox 57 on November 30, 2017. We don’t think waiting more than two weeks for security updates is a good idea! Here’s a more recent example from a minor release: On January 23, 2018, Mozilla released Firefox 58 and Firefox ESR 52.6 with a variety of security fixes. Three days later, the Waterfox project said it was working on integrating these patches on Twitter. On February 1, 2018, Waterfox 56.0.4 was released with these patches. That means Waterfox users waited nine days for a security patches from a minor release, compared to if they were just using Firefox. We don’t think it’s a good idea to wait that long. In the future, this will only get more complicated as the Waterfox developers try to make their own browser. We recommend staying away and just using Firefox ESR. Pale Moon Is Based on Very Outdated Firefox Code. Pale Moon is based on older Firefox code. The current version of Pale Moon is based on Firefox 38 ESR, which was originally released in 2015. The prior release was based on Firefox 24 ESR, which was released in 2013. The project uses an older Firefox interface created before the Australis theme, and still supports XUL add-ons. Rather than being based on Mozilla’s Gecko rendering engine, Pale Moon is based on “Goanna“, an open-source browser engine that’s a fork of gecko. (In open-source software, a “fork” is when someone takes the existing code of a project, copies it, and develops it themselves from that point forward, going in a different direction.) While Waterfox is based on code that’s currently supported by Mozilla, Pale Moon is based on much older code. It won’t have the new web features or performance improvements of modern versions of Firefox, nor does it support watching certain kinds of video with DRM. More importantly, basing a browser on such old code makes security patches harder. Pale Moon’s developer tries to keep up with Firefox security patches, but he’s maintaining old code that Mozilla has abandoned. Mozilla reportedly has over a thousand employees, while Pale Moon has one primary developer, trying to maintain a huge amount of code that’s becoming increasingly outdated. The older code also omits features that help make modern browsers so secure, like the multi-process sandboxing features that have finally arrived in Firefox Quantum. Besides, Pale Moon tends to perform worse on browser benchmarks compared to modern browsers, which isn’t surprising given its age. The developer disagrees with browser benchmarking, but it’s not surprising a browser based on four year old code might be slower than a modern one. Basilisk Is a More Modern, But More Unstable Pale Moon. Basilisk is a new browser from the creator of Pale Moon. While Pale Moon is based on Firefox 38 ESR, Basilisk is based on newer Firefox code. The developer is working on the “Unified XUL Platform (UXP)”, which is a fork of Mozilla’s code without the new Servo and Rust code that makes Firefox Quantum so fast. It also doesn’t enable any multi-process features. A future version of Pale Moon will be based on this code, but right now the developer considers Basilisk an unstable development platform. This fits Pale Moon’s kind of weird history. The first major version of Pale Moon was based on Firefox 24 ESR, due to a disagreement about where Firefox was headed. But the developer eventually had to switch to Firefox 38 ESR to get more modern features. Now, the developer is doing the same thing again, basing this new version largely on the pre-Quantum Firefox code. We don’t see the point of resisting new features only to make a major leap to them every few years anyway. Just stick with a browser that’s continually updated, like Firefox. As for why you shouldn’t use this browser, aside from the same security and usability concerns inherent with Pale Moon, even the developer says it’s “development software” that should be considered beta. These aren’t the only Firefox-based browsers out there, but they are the most popular—and most others will likely come with similar issues. It’s best to stick with a browser that has a big team behind it so security problems can be caught, fixed, and patched as fast as possible. Waterfox. If you want to continue running Firefox, yet would prefer to run an application that takes full advantage of your 64-bit operating system, then Waterfox is certainly a contender. Waterfox is essentially Mozilla Firefox's code compiled as a 64-bit application for Windows. It includes support for all of Firefox's features including plug-ins, extensions and everything else you expect Firefox to do. Visually, the only different layout feature you might notice is the blue logo. In terms of speed, we noticed that running Waterfox on a 64-bit system just makes your browsing experience faster. Loading web pages, JavaScript-intensive applications and even videos with this 64-bit browser just seemed much faster. In terms of issues you might have with Firefox, they will probably just be replicated by Waterfox. At the end of reviewing this program, we are actually in the middle of replacing many of our Firefox installations with Waterfox! In the end, highly recommended. Features and highlights. Compiled in Intel's C mompiler Intel's math library Streaming SIMD extensions 3 Advanced vector extensions Jemalloc Profile-guided optimization /O3 switch. Waterfox G3.2.4.1 on 32-bit and 64-bit PCs. This download is licensed as freeware for the Windows (32-bit and 64-bit) operating system on a laptop or desktop PC from web browsers without restrictions. Waterfox G3.2.4.1 is available to all software users as a free download for Windows. As an open source project, you are free to view the source code and distribute this software application freely. Waterfox. Waterfox is a fast browser that uses the 64-bit architecture and is graphically similar to FireFox. Waterfox was launched in March 2011 by a 16-year-old student (Alex Kontos), and is a web browser, a version of Firefox that takes full advantage of computers running 64-bit operating systems optimized for speed and high performance. Waterfox was one of the first browsers distributed over 64 bits and quickly gained popularity. A major 64-bit advantage is obviously allowing you to access more than 3.5GB of RAM, helping to accelerate your computer. When it comes to graphic layout, besides its name in the main menu, Waterfox looks and works like Firefox, including the various customizable features and options. All Firefox add-ons will work with Waterfox , but only 64-bit plug-ins that currently include Adobe Flash, Oracle Java, and Microsoft Silverlight are supported. It is important to know that Waterfox significantly shares Firefox settings, so you should uninstall it, but do not select the option to delete your personal information if you still use Firefox. Finally, Waterfox is a good browser, but not the fastest, and if you use Firefox on a 64-bit system, it would be much better to try Waterfox . * No Telemetry - Waterfox does not collect ANY telemetry, meaning you don't have to worry about any tracking or usage information about what you do inside YOUR browser. * Limited Data Collection - The only thing that Waterfox sends back is your OS and browser version to check for updates. * Bootstrapped add-ons - Waterfox is one of the few fully customizable browsers, allowing you to modify and extend it any way you please. You'll even find some of your favourite classic XPCOM add-ons ported over such as DownThemAll!, Greasemonkey and the like. * Support for NPAPI Plugins - They should be used responsibly, but Waterfox still supports the use of Java and Silverlight plugins, as well as any other 64-Bit NPAPI plugins.