Lichens of the Zumwalt Prairie

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Lichens of the Zumwalt Prairie Family Species Substrate, (Occurrence*) Alternative Name CANDELARIACAE Candelaria concolor Various trees (not pine), (c) Candleflame lichen, lemon lichen CATILLARIACEAE Toninia ruginosa Fence post, (c) Bruised lichen CLADONIACEAE Cladonia coniocraea Rotten log, (o) Common powderhorn Cladonia pocillum Soil, (c) Rosette pixie-cup, carpet pixie-cup Cladonia pyxidata Soil, (c) Pebbled pixie-cup COLLEMATACEAE Collema tenax Soil, (o) Soil jelly lichen, tar-jelly Leptogium lichenoides Soil, (c) Tattered jellyskin HYMENELIACEAE Aspicilia desertorum Rock, (o) Desert aspicilia Aspicilia fruticulosa Soil, (r) Lecanora fruticulosa Aspicilia hispida Soil, (o) Vagabond lichen Megaspora verrucosa Soil, (c) False sunken disk lichen LECANORACEAE Rhizoplaca melanophthalma Rock, soil, (c) Green rock posy LECIDEACEAE Lecidea tessellata Rock, (c) Tile lichen PARMELIACEAE Bryoria fuscescens Pinus ponderosa, (c) Pale-footed horsehair lichen Evernia prunastri Crataegus douglasii, (r) Oakmoss lichen Hypogymnia imshaugii Pinus ponderosa, (c) Forked tube lichen Hypogymnia physodes Pinus ponderosa, (o) Monk's hood lichen, hooded tube lichen, puffed lichen Hypogymnia tubulosa Pinus ponderosa, (c) Power-headed tube lichen Letharia vulpina Pinus ponderosa, (c) Wolf lichen Melanelia fuliginosa Crataegus douglasii, (c) Shiny camouflage lichen Melanelia multispora Crataegus douglasii, (c) Many-spored camouflage lichen Nodobryoria abbreviata Pinus ponderosa, (c) Tufted foxtail lichen Parmelia sulcata Crataegus douglasii, (c) Hammered shield lichen Parmeliopsis ambigua Rotten log, (c) Shield lichen Tuckermannopsis chlorophylla Pinus ponderosa, (o) Powdered wrinkle lichen Tuckermannopsis merrillii Pinus ponderosa, (c) Kaernefeltia merrillii, greenleaf tuckermannopsis lichen Tuckermannopsis platyphylla Pinus ponderosa, (c) Broad wrinkle lichen Usnea filipendula Crataegus douglasii, (c) Inflated beard lichen Vulpicida canadensis Pinus ponderosa, (o) Brown-eyed sunshine lichen Xanthoparmelia plittii Rock, (c) Plitt's rock shield Xanthoria polycarpa Crataegus douglasii, (c) Pin-cushion sunburst lichen PELTIGERACEAE Peltigera canina Soil, (o) Dog lichen Peltigera didactyla Soil, (o) Alternating dog lichen Peltigera ponojensis Soil, (o) Pale-bellied dog lichen Peltigera rufescens Soil, (c) Field dog lichen PERTUSARIACEAE Ochrolechia upsaliensis Soil, (o) Tundra saucer lichen Pertusaria amara Rotten log, (c) Bitter wart lichen PHYSCIACEAE Physcia dimidiata Rock, Populus tremuloides, Powder-tipped rosette lichen (c) Physcia tenella Populus tremuloides, (c) Fringed rosette lichen PSORACEAE Psora montana Soil, (c) Mountain fishscale lichen Psora nipponica Soil, (o) Psora novomexicana, butterfly scale lichen TELOSCHISTALES Xanthoria fallax Crataegus douglasii, (c) Hooded sunburst lichen THELOTREMATACEAE Diploschistes muscorum Soil, (o) Cowpie lichen UMBILICARIACEAE Umbilicaria hyperborea Rock, (c) Blistered rock tripe The Nature Conservancy Last modified 4/21/2010 Umbilicaria krascheninnikovii Rock, (o) Salty rock tripe Umbilicaria phaea Rock, (o) Emery rock tripe VERRUCARIACEAE Catapyrenium rufescens Soil, (c) Placidium rufescens (?) Dermatocarpon miniatum Soil, (o) Common stippleback, leather lichen Dermatocarpon bachmannii Rock, vagrant (o) Stippleback lichen variety Placidium squamulosum Soil, (c) Brown stipplescale lichen *Occurrence: Common=c, Occasional=o, Rare=r The Nature Conservancy Last modified 4/21/2010 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Umbilicariaceae Phylogeny TAXON 66 (6) • December 2017: 1282–1303
Davydov & al. • Umbilicariaceae phylogeny TAXON 66 (6) • December 2017: 1282–1303 Umbilicariaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) – Trait evolution and a new generic concept Evgeny A. Davydov,1 Derek Peršoh2 & Gerhard Rambold3 1 Altai State University, Lenin Ave. 61, Barnaul, 656049 Russia 2 Ruhr-Universität Bochum, AG Geobotanik, Gebäude ND 03/170, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany 3 University of Bayreuth, Plant Systematics, Mycology Dept., Universitätsstraße 30, NW I, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany Author for correspondence: Evgeny A. Davydov, [email protected] ORCID EAD, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-8506; DP, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-0189 DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/666.2 Abstract To reconstruct hypotheses on the evolution of Umbilicariaceae, 644 sequences from three independent DNA regions were used, 433 of which were newly produced. The study includes a representative fraction (presumably about 80%) of the known species diversity of the Umbilicariaceae s.str. and is based on the phylograms obtained using maximum likelihood and a Bayesian phylogenetic inference framework. The analyses resulted in the recognition of eight well-supported clades, delimited by a combination of morphological and chemical features. None of the previous classifications within Umbilicariaceae s.str. were supported by the phylogenetic analyses. The distribution of the diagnostic morphological and chemical traits against the molecular phylogenetic topology revealed the following patterns of evolution: (1) Rhizinomorphs were gained at least four times independently and are lacking in most clades grouping in the proximity of Lasallia. (2) Asexual reproductive structures, i.e., thalloconidia and lichenized dispersal units, appear more or less mutually exclusive, being restricted to different clades.
[Show full text]
H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education the Field Museum 1400
H. Thorsten Lumbsch VP, Science & Education The Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 USA Tel: 1-312-665-7881 E-mail: [email protected] Research interests Evolution and Systematics of Fungi Biogeography and Diversification Rates of Fungi Species delimitation Diversity of lichen-forming fungi Professional Experience Since 2017 Vice President, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago. USA 2014-2017 Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2014 Curator, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2013-2014 Associate Director, Integrative Research Center, Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2009-2013 Chair, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2011 MacArthur Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2006-2014 Associate Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 2005-2009 Head of Cryptogams, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. Since 2004 Member, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago. Courses: BIOS 430 Evolution (UIC), BIOS 23410 Complex Interactions: Coevolution, Parasites, Mutualists, and Cheaters (U of C) Reading group: Phylogenetic methods. 2003-2006 Assistant Curator, Dept. of Botany, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA. 1998-2003 Privatdozent (Assistant Professor), Botanical Institute, University – GHS - Essen. Lectures: General Botany, Evolution of lower plants, Photosynthesis, Courses: Cryptogams, Biology
[Show full text]
One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity
Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
[Show full text]
9B Taxonomy to Genus
Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
[Show full text]
A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families
A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
[Show full text]
Winter 2009 the California Lichen Society Seeks to Promote the Appreciation, Conservation and Study of Lichens
Bulletin of the California Lichen Society Volume 16 No. 2 Winter 2009 The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation and study of lichens. The interests of the Society include the entire western part of the continent, although the focus is on California. Dues categories (in $US per year): Student and fixed income - $10, Regular - $20 ($25 for foreign members), Family - $25, Sponsor and Libraries - $35, Donor - $50, Benefactor - $100 and Life Membership - $500 (one time) payable to the California Lichen Society, PO Box 7775 #21135 , San Francisco, California 94120-7775. Members receive the Bulletin and notices of meetings, field trips, lectures and workshops. Board Members of the California Lichen Society: President: Erin Martin, shastalichens gmail.com Vice President: Michelle Caisse Secretary: Patti Patterson Treasurer: Cheryl Beyer Editor: Tom Carlberg Committees of the California Lichen Society: Data Base: Bill Hill, chairperson Conservation: Eric Peterson, chairperson Education/Outreach: Erin Martin, chairperson Poster/Mini Guides: Janet Doell, chairperson Events/field trips/workshops: Judy Robertson, chairperson The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society (ISSN 1093-9148) is edited by Tom Carlberg, tcarlberg7 yahoo.com. The Bulletin has a review committee including Larry St. Clair, Shirley Tucker, William Sanders, and Richard Moe, and is produced by Eric Peterson. The Bulletin welcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their activities. The best way to submit manuscripts is by e-mail attachments or on a CD in the format of a major word processor (DOC or RTF preferred).
[Show full text]
Photobiont Associations in Co-Occurring Umbilicate Lichens with Contrasting Modes of Reproduction in Coastal Norway
The Lichenologist 48(5): 545–557 (2016) © British Lichen Society, 2016 doi:10.1017/S0024282916000232 Photobiont associations in co-occurring umbilicate lichens with contrasting modes of reproduction in coastal Norway Geir HESTMARK, François LUTZONI and Jolanta MIADLIKOWSKA Abstract: The identity and phylogenetic placement of photobionts associated with two lichen-forming fungi, Umbilicaria spodochroa and Lasallia pustulata were examined. These lichens commonly grow together in high abundance on coastal cliffs in Norway, Sweden and Finland. The mycobiont of U. spodochroa reproduces sexually through ascospores, and must find a suitable algal partner in the environment to re-establish the lichen symbiosis. Lasallia pustulata reproduces mainly vegetatively using symbiotic propagules (isidia) containing both symbiotic partners (photobiont and mycobiont). Based on DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) we detected seven haplotypes of the green-algal genus Trebouxia in 19 pairs of adjacent thalli of U. spodochroa and L. pustulata from five coastal localities in Norway. As expected, U. spodochroa associated with a higher diversity of photobionts (seven haplotypes) than the mostly asexually reproducing L. pustulata (four haplotypes). The latter was associated with the same haplotype in 15 of the 19 thalli sampled. Nine of the lichen pairs examined share the same algal haplotype, supporting the hypothesis that the mycobiont of U. spodochroa might associate with the photobiont ‘pirated’ from the abundant isidia produced by L. pustulata that are often scattered on the cliff surfaces. Up to six haplotypes of Trebouxia were found within a single sampling site, indicating a low level of specificity of both mycobionts for their algal partner. Most photobiont strains associated with species of Umbilicaria and Lasallia, including samples from this study, represent phylogenetically closely related taxa of Trebouxia grouped within a small number of main clades (Trebouxia sp., T.
[Show full text]
What Is a Lichen – a Prison Or an Opportunity? Lichens Cannot Be Classified As Plants
What is a lichen – a prison or an opportunity? Lichens cannot be classified as plants. They are associations between cup fungi ascomycetes plus either green algae (Trebouxia sp.) or cyanobacteria (e.g. Nostoc), members of three kingdoms outside the plant kingdom. Simon Schwendener discovered the dual nature of lichens in 1869 : Ascomycetes surround some single- celled green algae with a fibrous net to compel the new slaves to work for them, a view that was replaced with romanticized notion of a harmonious symbiosis. Mycobiont gets sugar alcohols from green algae or glucose + nitrogen from cyanobacteria, which are stored in an inacessible form (e.g. mannitol). Lichens Species & Diversity Lichens consist of a fungus (the mycobiont, mostly an ascomycete ) & a photosynthetic partner (the photobiont or phycobiont ), usually either a green alga (commonly Trebouxia ) or cyanobacterium (c. Nostoc ) All lichens have an upper cortex , which is a dense, protective skin of fungal tissue that acts l ike a blind that opens after watering . Below that is a photosynthetic layer, which can be a colony of either green algae or cyanobacteria. Then there is a layer of loose threads (hyphae) of the fungus, called the medulla or the medullary layer . Fructicose & Foliose lichens have a lower cortex , others just have an exposed medulla. Crustose lichens never have a lower cortex-their fungal layer attaches firmly to the substrate. What is that? Is that a plant? Is that a fungus? Is that a lichen? What the …halloh! Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides ) Usnea is a lichen (a composite organism closely resembles its namesake ( Usnea , or made from algae and fungi) and is referred beard lichen), but in fact it is not to as Old Man's Beard.
[Show full text]
Piedmont Lichen Inventory
PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al.
[Show full text]
Genome-Wide Analyses of Biosynthetic Genes in Lichen
Genome-wide analyses of biosynthetic genes in lichen - forming fungi Dissertation zu Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften vorgelegt beim Fachbereich Biowissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universität in Frankfurt am Main von Anjuli Calchera aus Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt (2019) (D 30) vom Fachbereich Biowissenschaften der Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universität als Dissertation angenommen. Dekan: Prof. Dr. Sven Klimpel Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universität D-60438 Frankfurt am Main Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Imke Schmitt Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität Johann Wolfgang Goethe - Universität D-60438 Frankfurt am Main Prof. Dr. Markus Pfenninger Institut für Organismische und Molekulare Evolutionsbiologie Johannes Gutenberg - Universität Mainz D-55128 Mainz Datum der Disputation: 24.06.2020 This thesis is based on the following publications: Meiser,Meiser, A. A., Otte, J., Schmitt, I., & Dal Grande, F. (2017). Sequencing genomes from mixed DNA samples - evaluating the metagenome skimming approach in lichenized fungi. Scientiﬁc Reports, 7(1), 14881, doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14576-6. Dal Grande, F., Meiser,Meiser, A. A., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Otte, J., Ebersberger, I., & Schmitt, I. (2018a). The draft genome of the lichen-forming fungus Lasallia hispanica (Frey) Sancho & A. Crespo. The Lichenologist, 50(3), 329–340, doi:10.1017/S002428291800021X. Calchera,Calchera, A. A., Dal Grande, F., Bode, H. B., & Schmitt, I. (2019). Biosynthetic gene content of the ’perfume lichens’ Evernia prunastri and Pseudevernia furfuracea. Molecules, 24(1), 203, doi:10.3390/molecules24010203. VII Contents 1. Abstract ......................................... 1 2. Introduction ....................................... 4 2.1. Natural products from fungi..........................4 2.2. Natural products from lichens.........................5 2.3. Lichen genomics..................................7 2.4.
[Show full text]
Frey† Udc 577.13 : 582.29
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Physics, Chemistry and Technology Vol. 14, No 2, 2016, pp. 125 - 133 DOI: 10.2298/FUPCT1602125Z ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF SECONDARY METABOLITES OF UMBILICARIA CRUSTULOSA (ACH.) FREY† UDC 577.13 : 582.29 Ivana Zlatanović, Goran Petrović, Olga Jovanović, Ivana Zrnzević, Gordana S. Stojanović Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia Abstract. Herein, we have studied secondary metabolites of Umbilicaria crustulosa (Ach.) Frey. By using preparative HPLC, four compounds were isolated from the U. crustulosa methanol extract. The structure of isolated lichen substances was determined on the basis of their 1H, 13C and 2D NMR spectra as follows: methyl orsellinate, lecanoric acid, methyl lecanorate and gyrophoric acid. In addition to methanol, the composition of acetone and ethanol extracts were also studied (analytical HPLC). Relative distributions (%) of the detected constituents were as follows (in methanol/acetone/ethanol extracts): methyl orsellinate (5.7/1.5/0.9), lecanoric acid (17.9/5.7/6.7), crustinic acid (8.0/2.8/2.5), methyl lecanorate (4.8/0/0) and gyrophoric acid (59.2/78.0/85.7). A significant difference in the chemical profiles of the studied extracts was in the presence/absence of methyl esters of lichen acids. Nonetheless, the chemical composition of the ethanol extracts (no ethyl esters were detected) and the fact that treatment of acetone and ethanol extracts with methanol does not lead to changes in their composition suggests that methyl esters were not artifacts of the isolation procedure. The lower content of methyl orsellinate and the absence of methyl lecanorate from acetone and ethanol extracts may be the result of different solubilities of these compounds in methanol, ethanol and acetone.
[Show full text]
A Reinvestigation of Microthelia Umbilicariae Results in a Contribution to the Species Diversity in Endococcus 1-23 - 1
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Fritschiana Jahr/Year: 2019 Band/Volume: 94 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hafellner Josef Artikel/Article: A reinvestigation of Microthelia umbilicariae results in a contribution to the species diversity in Endococcus 1-23 - 1 - A reinvestigation of Microthelia umbilicariae results in a contribution to the species diversity in Endococcus Josef HAFELLNER* HAFELLNER Josef 2019: A reinvestigation of Microthelia umbilicariae results in a contribution to the species diversity in Endococcus. - Fritschiana (Graz) 94: 1–23. - ISSN 1024-0306. Abstract: A set of morphoanatomical characters and the amy- loid reaction of the ascomatal centrum indicates that Microthelia umbilicariae Linds. belongs to Endococcus (Verrucariales). En- dococcus freyi Hafellner, detected on Umbilicaria cylindrica (type locality in Austria), is described as new to science. The new combinations Endococcus umbilicariae (Linds.) Hafellner and Didymocyrtis peltigerae (Fuckel) Hafellner are introduced. Key words: Ascomycota, key, Lasallia, lichenicolous fungi, Um- bilicaria, Verrucariales, Pleosporales *Institut für Biologie, Bereich Pflanzenwissenschaften, NAWI Graz, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA. e-mail: [email protected] Introduction The genus Microthelia Körb. dates back to the classical period of lichen- ology when for the first time sufficiently powerful light microscopes opened the universe of fungal spores and their characters to researchers interested in fungal diversity (KÖRBER 1855). Over the time, 277 species and infraspecific taxa have been assigned to Microthelia, now a rejected generic name against the conserved genus Anisomeridium (Müll.Arg.) M.Choisy. In the second half of the 19th century also several lichenicolous fungi have either been described in Microthelia, namely by the British mycologist William Lauder Lindsay (1829–1880), or have been transferred to Microthelia by combination.
[Show full text]