Cardinia Planning Scheme Amendment C150

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cardinia Planning Scheme Amendment C150 Planning and Environment Act 1987 CARDINIA PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C150 EXPLANATORY REPORT Who is the planning authority? This amendment has been prepared by the Roads Corporation (Trading as VicRoads). The amendment has been made at the request of VicRoads. Land affected by the amendment The amendment applies to various parcels of land generally abutting the existing Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road between the Pakenham Bypass and the South Gippsland Highway (refer to Figure 1 overleaf). Between the Pakenham Bypass and Manks Road, land directly adjacent to the existing Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road will be affected due to an increased road reservation. Additional areas of land will be affected around the intersections with Hall Road, Ballarto Road and Manks Road. The construction of the bypass of Koo Wee Rup will affect land parcels crossed by the new alignment between Manks Rd, Rossiter Road and South Gippsland Highway. The longer-term freeway connection to and interchange with the Pakenham Bypass will affect various land parcels between the Pakenham Bypass and Deep Creek, both east and west of McGregor Road. Figure 1 Proposed alignment of the upgraded Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Rd and land to be acquired. What the amendment does The amendment: Applies the Public Acquisition Overlay – Schedule 1 (PAO1) to the land required for the proposed road upgrade. Removes sections of the existing Public Acquisition Overlay – Schedule 1 (PAO1) that are not required for the proposed bypass of Koo Wee Rup. Revises the Schedule to Clause 52.03 to include reference to the project and the Incorporated Document titled ‘Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road – Stage 1A (Koo Wee Rup Bypass) – Incorporated Document (September 2012)’. Revises the Schedule to Clause 81.01 to include an Incorporated Document titled ‘Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road – Stage 1A (Koo Wee Rup Bypass) – Incorporated Document (September 2012)’. The PAO relates to all the land required to upgrade Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road over time. The timing of the staged upgrading of the route will depend on the rate of land development and traffic growth in the corridor. The following broad staging scenarios are proposed for the upgrading of the route: Initial Development: The proposed initial development of the route involves the construction of a single carriageway bypass of Koo Wee Rup (Stage 1A) and the progressive upgrading of the remainder of the road between the Pakenham Bypass and Koo Wee Rup to a divided road standard (Stage 1B). This is shown in Figure 2 overleaf. Longer-term Development: The proposed longer-term development of the route involves the conversion of the route to freeway standard (Stage 2). This includes a new link to the Pakenham Bypass, the conversion of roundabouts to interchanges and construction of an interchange with the South Gippsland Highway. This is shown in Figure 3 overleaf. The development of the land will be controlled by an Incorporated Document titled ‘Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road – Stage 1A (Koo Wee Rup Bypass) – Incorporated Document (Setptember 2012)’. This document will provide planning approval to allow the construction of Stage 1A only of the upgrading of Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road between the Pakenham Bypass and the South Gippsland Highway provided the conditions in the Incorporated Document are met. No further planning approval is required to use and develop land for Stage 1A if generally in accordance with the Incorporated Document. The Incorporated Document applies to Stage 1A of the project only. This is consistent with the current project referral under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Act and the decision made under the Environmental Effects Act 1978. Planning and environmental approvals for Stages 1B and 2 will be sought at the relevant time when their construction is anticipated. Construction timeframes will be set and the relevant planning and environmental approvals will be sought when the rate of land development and traffic growth in the corridor warrant the further upgrading of the route. Figure 2 – Initial Development Stages 1A & 1B Stage 1A Stage 1B Figure 3 – Longer-term Development Stage 2 Strategic assessment of the amendment Why is the amendment required? Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road provides a link between the Princes Freeway and South Gippsland Highway corridors for inter-regional traffic. The opening of the Pakenham Bypass has increased the strategic importance of the route as evidenced by the increase in traffic that has occurred. Much of this increase in traffic consists of trucks which are choosing to use this route to reduce travel times and minimise freight transport costs. This shift in traffic has relieved parallel routes such as the South Gippsland Highway through Cranbourne and Berwick-Cranbourne Road/Clyde-Five Ways Road. Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road is currently a two-lane two-way road linking a four lane freeway with a four lane divided highway. For inter-regional traffic using this route, Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road represents a lower level of service with few overtaking opportunities, delays through the township of Koo Wee Rup and direct access to adjacent properties. As well as carrying through traffic, the road also caters for local traffic generated by the developing Pakenham South Employment Precinct and farming activities along the route. This traffic consists of cars, trucks and slow moving farm machinery. The recent increase in through traffic on Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road has made it more difficult for this local traffic to access the road. The route also passes through the commercial centre of the Koo Wee Rup township with parking on both sides of the street and a high level of pedestrian activity. The queuing of traffic at the T intersection in the town, limits the ability to access on-street parking and the high level of truck traffic results in noise and air quality impacts in the shopping area. Trucks passing through the town have to stop at T intersections to negotiate the turning movements. The local community has reported increased noise impacts in the residential areas of the town with the rise in truck traffic. There is a need to upgrade the route over time to ensure that it functions as an effective inter-regional route and provides relief to other parallel routes in the region within the Casey urban growth area. The upgrading of the route is also needed to minimise the impacts of increasing through traffic on safety and amenity of the local community. The first step in any such infrastructure project is the identification and reservation of the land required for its construction. VicRoads has undertaken a comprehensive analysis process to firstly, identify its preferred route alignment and secondly, identify the land required to upgrade the road. This land must be reserved in order for it to be protected from future land development and acquired prior to construction. The introduction of a PAO is the most appropriate tool to reserve the land required. The PAOs will reserve all land required for the longer-term development of the road to freeway standard. Although some of this land will not be required in the initial stage of the upgrade, the reservation of all land required for the ultimate freeway standard will secure the land and facilitate the timely upgrading of the road in the longer-term. Additionally, it will provide land owners with a high level of certainty about the ultimate impact of the road upgrade on their properties. There is an existing PAO1 along Healesville-Koo Wee Rup Road between Ballarto Road and the Bunyip River drains, along a disused road reserve between the Bunyip River drains and Rossiter Road and along Rossiter Road to the South Gippsland Highway. The proposed upgrade of the road will affect land outside the existing PAO1 area and as such, some sections of the existing PAO1 need to be enlarged while other sections need to be removed. How does the amendment implement the objectives of planning in Victoria? The planning scheme amendment will be supportive of and assist in the implementation of the objectives of planning in Victoria as set out in Section 4 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. In particular: 4(1) (a) to provide for the fair, orderly, economic and sustainable use, and development of land; through the commencement of a major road upgrade which has appropriately assessed the environmental and cultural impacts to arrive at the most economic and sustainable option. 4(1) (b) to provide for the protection of natural and man-made resources and the maintenance of ecological processes and generic diversity; through the completion of a thorough, careful environmental investigation, design and assessment process; through the completion of a thorough, careful environmental investigation, design and assessment process. 4(1) (c) to secure a pleasant, efficient and safe working, living and recreational environment for all Victorians and visitors to Victoria; through its achievement of a safe, pleasant and efficient road system for local road users and the wider travelling public. 4 (1)(d) to conserve and enhance those buildings, areas or other places which are of scientific, aesthetic, architectural or historical interest, or otherwise of special cultural value; by consideration and mitigation of any potential effects on the heritage and cultural values and features of the area. 4(1) (e) to protect public utilities and other assets and enable the orderly provision and co-ordination of public utilities and other facilities for the benefit of the community; by facilitating the provision, protection and coordination of a major public infrastructure asset of benefit to the community. 4 (1) (f)to facilitate development in accordance with the objectives set out in paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e); through facilitating the development of an important component of the State and regional road system that best meets the Minister’s environmental assessment and objectives for planning Victoria.
Recommended publications
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT MATTERS AWAITING RESPONSE Edition No
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT MATTERS AWAITING RESPONSE Edition No. 14 As at 30 April 2009 (Raised 5 February 2008) Member Minister Topic Mr P.R. Davis Public Transport Rail: Gippsland line Mr Pakula Sport, Recreation and Youth Affairs Williamstown Cricket Ground: Redevelopment Ms Lovell Roads and Ports Bridges:Yarrawonga-Mulwala Ms Tierney Sport, Recreation and Youth Affairs Albert Park, Warrnambool: trail network (Raised 6 February 2008) Member Minister Topic Ms Darveniza Sport, Recreation and Youth Affairs Chiltern: skate park (Raised 7 February 2008) Member Minister Topic Mrs Kronberg Public Transport Disability services: taxis Mr Somyurek Roads and Ports Pounds–Shrives roads, Narre Warren South: traffic control (Raised 28 February 2008) Member Minister Topic Ms Lovell Roads and Ports Murray Valley Highway–Cullens Road, Yarrawonga: turning lane Ms Pennicuik Education Teachers: enterprise bargaining agreement Mr Eideh Public Transport Rail: level crossing safety Mr Koch Roads and Ports Port of Melbourne: Webb Dock 2 Legislative Council Adjournment Matters Awaiting Response Edition No. 14 Mr Elasmar Consumer Affairs Consumer affairs: lottery scams Mr Vogels Rural and Regional Development Bannockburn: community hub Mrs Petrovich Roads and Ports Northern Highway, Kilmore: traffic control (Raised 11 March 2008) Member Minister Topic Ms Tierney Sport, Recreation and Youth Affairs Aireys Inlet tennis club: facilities Mr Vogels Regional and Rural Development Anglesea: riverbank facilities Mr Finn Roads and Ports Sunbury Road, Bulla: traffic
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names of Casey and Cardinia
    Place Names of Casey and Cardinia Casey Cardinia Libraries have compiled this list of place names and their meanings from the City of Casey and Cardinia Shire and related neighbouring areas. It includes early schools in the area, as school names often reflected the fluidity of town names in the early days. They also indicate the locations of towns that no longer exist. Army Road, Pakenham Army Road marks the location of the Salvation Army boy's home established in Pakenham in 1900. It subsequently became a home for Girls and then an Old Men's Home. The home closed in the 1920s. The Army Road School. No.3847, operated intermittently form 1914 until 1947. (W, V) Avonsleigh John (J.W) and Anna wright owned a guesthouse called Avonsleigh House at the corner of Emerald-Macclesfield and Emerald Roads. The name was adopted in 1911. The area was previously known as East Emerald. See also Wright Railway Station. (C) Balla Balla The Balla Balla run on Rutherford inlet was taken up in 1839 by Robert Innes Allan. The meaning is uncertain. Ballarat is aboriginal for resting or camping place from balla 'resting on one's elbow; and arat 'place', so it could mean 'resting'. Another possible meaning is 'mud'.There is a Balla Balla river, near Whim Creek, in the Pilbara Western Australia which was first recorded by Surveyor, Alexander Forrest in 1879. The name is thought to be derived from the Aboriginal word parla, from the Kariyarra language, meaning 'mud'. (B) Ballarto Road John Bakewell retained ownership of the Tooradin run in 1856 when his partnership with John Mickle and William Lyall dissolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Koo Wee Rup Groundwater Management Plan Is an Action to Better Manage the Groundwater Resources of the Protection Area
    Groundwater Management Plan Koo Wee Rup Water Supply Protection Area Preface Throughout Victoria, regional Sustainable Water Strategies consider actions to balance water supply and water demand and ensure sharing of water resources between consumptive users and the environment. The Koo Wee Rup Groundwater Management Plan is an action to better manage the groundwater resources of the Protection Area. It is an adaptive tool thatintegrates, over time, the recommendations of the Central Region Sustainable Water Strategy to manage the Protection Area’s groundwater supply, demand and environmental health. A consultative committee, as listed below, has had input into the development of this Plan via extensive discussions and considerations of technical work. The committee recognises that its guidelines are set by the Minister, specifically on the management issues to be considered. The Koo Wee Rup Groundwater Management Plan consultative committee members: Mr Ron Chatfield (Chair) Landholder Mr Tom Schreurs Landholder Mr Andrew (Bill) Giles Landholder Mr Peter Marson Landholder Cr Stuart Halligan Cardinia Shire Council Mr Jon Theobald South East Water Ltd Ms Elissa McNamara Southern Rural Water These members were appointed by the Minister for Water under section 29 of the Water Act 1989. These appointments were made in consultation with Southern Rural Water, the Department of Sustainability & Environment and the Victorian Farmers’ Federation. The Koo Wee Rup Groundwater Management Plan ex officio observer: Mr Chris McAuley Department of Sustainability
    [Show full text]
  • FEBRUARY 2017 AUSTRALIA DAY Once Again There Was a Big Turnout on Australia Day to Celebrate Local Adults and School Students Who Contribute to Our Town
    THE KOO WEE RUP BLACKFISH FEBRUARY 2017 AUSTRALIA DAY Once again there was a big turnout on Australia Day to celebrate local adults and school students who contribute to our town. Our guest ambassador, Jessica Smith, a former paralympian, spoke eloquently about growing up in a small country town and being different to the other kids. An egg and bacon roll breakfast and lamington morning tea was prepared by the KWR CWA, with BBQ duties undertaken by members and friends of the Township Committee News about individual award winners begins on page 2 Pictures: top right ‐ Award Winner Valmai Walker, with ambassador Jessica Smith;, bottom right ‐ Stacey Rouse with her children Ella & Kye, all individual award winners; bottom middle and left ‐ the egg and bacon production line THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES The Township held its AGM and monthly meeting on Wednesday, 7 December. Township Meetings are open to anyone who would like to attend. The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, 1 February at 7:30 pm at the Community Centre. Mr Barry Baker spoke to the committee about issues regarding the toilet facilities at the Woolworths shopping complex in Station St raised at earlier meetings. When Mr Baker purchased the development the plans had already been approved by council. The number of public toilets was set by this planning permit. Cleanliness: This is the worst of several facilities that Mr Baker owns. Toilets cleaned twice daily, most of the problems are with the ladies toilet, the men’s is relatively trouble free. Vandalism, blocking toilets is a constant issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Melbourne Connect | Special Report October 2008
    • transport • community • industry outer Special Report | October 2008 melbourne outer melbourne connect | special report October 2008 Melbourne is booming. Every week, another 1,200 people call Melbourne home and the Victorian Government now predicts that we will become the nation’s largest city within 20 years. This rapid population growth has strained Melbourne’s transport system and threatens Victoria’s economic prosperity and Melbourne’s liveability. The region feeling the pain the outer most is outer Melbourne, home to over half of Melbourne’s population and set for continued rapid growth. melbourne In 2002, RACV produced a special report titled ‘The Missing Links’, which presented a plan for upgrading transport infrastructure in outer metropolitan Melbourne. transport The Missing Links identified seventy-four critical road and public transport projects and a much needed $2.2 billion community investment. Six years on, only half of these projects have been built or had funds committed to build them. The other industry half remain incomplete and the intervening period of strong population and economic growth has created further pressing demands on our transport system. Melbourne’s liveability is recognised worldwide and RACV wants it to stay this way. For this reason, we have again consulted with state and local governments and listened to Members to identify an updated program of works to meet the needs of people living in and travelling through Melbourne’s outer suburbs. RACV presents Outer Melbourne Connect as a responsible blueprint comprising road improvements, rail line extensions and significant public transport service improvements.Connect provides a comprehensive and connected transport network to address the critical backlog of projects in outer Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Infrastructure Inquiry Submission S003 Received 17/08
    From: South Eastern Centre for Sustainability <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, 15 August 2020 1:28 PM To: Darren Cheeseman <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: 1: ATTENTION MINISTER GREG HUNT/ MR DAVID MORRIS ‐ NEW NATIONAL PARK PROPOSAL IN MOUNT ELIZA BASED ON STATEWIDE GOVERNMENTAL INITIATIVES Importance: High Dear Mr Cheeseman, I thank for the Inquiry into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations which states: The Legislative Assembly Environment and Planning Committee is seeking information on how to secure environmental infrastructure for Melbourne and regional Victoria now and into the future. As examples of environmental infrastructure the Committee includes parks and open space, sporting fields, forest and bushland, wildlife corridors and waterways. The website provided https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/epc-la/inquiry/968 includes a number of links and pdf descriptions in line with responding to pressing environmental concerns which we have already specified in relation to our correspondence to Ministers Wynne and D'Ambrosio beneath which we would appreciate your active support for in the creation of an outstanding nationalo park in Mount Eliza which also has significant research and tourism potential. The following document from the Victorian National Parks Association (VNPA) draws attention to the acute shortages of national park so your initiative couldn't come at a better time: https://vnpa.org.au/wp- content/uploads/2017/11/Victorian-Parks-by-Premier.pdf Your direct support in the creation of the National Park in Mount Eliza would be much appreciated . Ihave been advised that Premier Andrews is supportive of/excited about new national parks and that Prime Minister Scott Morrison actually pledged millions for the enhancement of national parks in the northern territory and NSW during the election campaign but Victoria was absolutely neglected.
    [Show full text]
  • Past and Present Waterscapes of Tooradin and Koo Wee Rup Swampland
    WATERFRONT: PAST AND PRESENT WATERSCAPES OF TOORADIN AND KOO WEE RUP SWAMPLAND PRIMER: A selection of readings about the landscape of the old swamplands of Koo Wee Rup and the coastal shores of Tooradin and Westernport. Compiled by Monash Urban Lab Waterfront is proudly presented by Centre for Architecture Victoria | Open House Melbourne, in partnership with DELWP and East Gippsland Shire Council. Waterfront is part of Melbourne Design Week 2021, an initiative of the Victorian Government in collaboration with the NGV. CONTENTS: MAP FOR A VANISHED LANDSCAPE BY LIAM DAVISON p.6 Davison, Liam. “Map for a Vanished Landscape.” Griffith Review, 44 (2014): https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/map-for-a-vanished-landscape/ THE SWAMPY LOWLANDS OF MELBOURNE BY CATHERINE MURPHY p.23 AND NIGEL BERTRAM Murphy, Catherine, and Nigel Bertram. “The Swampy Lowlands of Melbourne”. In In Time With Water: Design Studies of 3 Australian Cities, edited by Nigel Bertram and Catherine Murphy, 79-153. Perth: UWAP, 2019. ECOLOGY OF THE KOOWEERUP SWAMP AND ASSOCIATED p.42 GRASSLANDS BY JEFFREY YUGOVIC Yugovic, Jeffrey. “Ecology of the Kooweerup Swamp and associated grasslands.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, no 123 (2, 2011): 172-188. WESTERNPORT BAY, FRENCH ISLAND AND PHILLIP ISLAND BY ERIC p.63 C. F. BIRD Bird, Eric C.F., The Coast of Victoria: The Shaping of Scenery, Carlton.: Melbourne Source: Monash Urban Lab UniversityPress, 1993, 192-231. COMPILED BY: Monash Urban Lab Department of Architecture Monash University https://www.monash.edu/mada/research/monash-urban-lab For research purposes only. Copyright held by authors or publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Compulsory Acquisition
    Your guide to compulsory acquisition Contents Introduction Introduction 1 This guide has been prepared to assist land owners, tenants, businesses and licence holders affected by compulsory land acquisition and seeks to: What is compulsory acquisition? 2 » explain some of the processes associated with compulsory land acquisition What is an acquiring authority? 3 » explore some of the types of compensation What rights does an acquiring authority have? 3 » highlight legal obligations Can I stop a compulsory acquisition? 3 » advise how Hunt & Hunt can assist Three stages of compulsory acquisition 4 The aim of this document is to provide an overview of the compulsory acquisition process and to outline the avenues and options available to: Stage 1 – Early planning 6 » those who are involved in a compulsory acquisition Stage 1 facts 7 » those who think they may be affected by a future compulsory acquisition How Hunt & Hunt can help 7 Stage 2 – Identifying future acquisitions 8 What is the impact of a PAO? 8 Stage 2 facts 8 How Hunt & Hunt can help 9 Stage 3 – Acquisition process commences 10 Who can claim? 10 What am I entitled to? 10 Compensation 12 Resolving Claims 12 Stage 3 facts 13 How Hunt & Hunt can help 13 Can I deal with this myself? 14 Acquisition timeline 16 Glossary and Legislation 18 Compulsory acquisition experience 20 The information contained herein is intended to provide general information in summary form, current at the time of publication. It does not constitute legal advice or a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such.
    [Show full text]
  • RACV's Blueprint for Road and Public Transport Projects Needed in Outer
    Growing OUTER Pains MELBOURNE > RACV’s blueprint for road and public transport projects needed in outer Melbourne RACV’S BLUEPRINT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECTS NEEDED IN OUTER MELBOURNE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECTS ROAD FOR BLUEPRINT RACV’S GROWING PAINS Population growth Growing pains A great place to live For Melbourne to be a world-class connected city, our transport Melbourne’s outer suburbs are a great place to live. The extra networks must reach well beyond its centre. space, proximity to nature and affordable land make the outer RACV recognises how important our outer suburbs are to the fringe an attractive place for Melburnians to buy their first Whittlesea overall health and vitality of our city, but is concerned by the home, settle or retire. But none of the financial and lifestyle Hume 4.1% following facts: benefits of living in the outer suburbs can be realised if daily 2.8% Nillumbik commutes are exhausting and even local travel is a struggle. • Victoria’s population is forecast to increase from just over 0.2% 6 million to approximately 10 million by 2050. Most will settle RACV wants outer communities to enjoy a wide range of in Greater Melbourne, many in outer suburbs. transport options that are seamlessly linked, safe, convenient, Melton efficient and affordable. To achieve these goals, RACV calls for 4.3% 6 7 17 Yarra Ranges • By 2031, our population in the outer suburbs will have 8 overtaken the total population of Melbourne’s inner and urgent upgrades to ageing and stressed transport networks 16 0.5% middle suburbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicroads Annual Report 2014 / 15
    VicRoads Annual Report 2014 / 15 1 Table of Contents Chief Executive’s message 4 Accountable officer’s declaration 5 Section 1: Report of operations 6 Year in review 6 Key financial results 23 Governance and organisational structure 30 Workforce data 36 Other disclosures 38 Section 2: Financial statements 46 Comprehensive operating statement 47 Balance sheet 48 Notes to the financial statements 51 Appendix 106 Disclosure index 106 2 VicRoads Annual Report 2014-15 Published by: VicRoads 60 Denmark St, Kew VIC 3101 August 2015 Also published at www.vicroads.vic.gov.au © Copyright State of Victoria 2015 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. International Standards Serial Number (ISSN): 1832-0732 VicRoads publication identification number 02916 Printed on ENVI 50/50 recycled paper ? 3 Chief Executive’s message This is an exciting time for VicRoads as we work towards bringing the three themes of our Strategic Commitment to life; caring about people and communities, sharing with each other to have greater impact through our collective effort, and daring to seize opportunities and take on tough challenges. These themes will shape the way we plan, consult and deliver with Victorians every day. As one of the lead agencies responsible for road safety in Victoria, we’ve spent the year on a new education program for our staff and leaders and worked with our road safety partners to think differently about how we will reduce the number This year VicRoads began a major reform of the of fatalities and serious injuries on our roads.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Alex Scott & Staff West Gippsland Football Netball
    2018 Alex Scott & Staff West Gippsland Football Netball Competition Best & Fairest Votes A GRADE Alana McRae Dalyston 27 Janelle Smith Phillip Island 26 Kimberly Hillberg Korumburra-Bena 25 Taylor Beck Nar Nar Goon 24 Georgia Keysers Nar Nar Goon 24 Mariah Bell Koo Wee Rup 18 Kelsey Buxton Inverloch-Kongwak 16 Brittany Thomas Dalyston 16 Renee Pilkington Inverloch-Kongwak 16 Gemma Dixon Korumburra-Bena 15 Emily Donovan Phillip Island 15 Sheena Clarke Koo Wee Rup 14 Kate Murphy Koo Wee Rup 13 Karla Brook Cora Lynn 11 Caitlin Wright Bunyip 10 Oliva Cope Inverloch-Kongwak 10 Lanni Pryor Inverloch-Kongwak 10 Shae Kyle Korumburra-Bena 10 Kate Steel Phillip Island 10 Gracie McRae Dalyston 9 Sophie Scott Dalyston 9 Kellie O'Neill Phillip Island 8 Rebecca Cox Nar Nar Goon 8 Grace Keysers Nar Nar Goon 7 Brooke Cleeland Bunyip 7 Hollie Keysers Nar Nar Goon 7 Hannah McRae Dalyston 7 Annelise Van Rooye Korumburra-Bena 7 Emma Kyle Korumburra-Bena 7 Lucy Monahan Kilcunda Bass 7 Jensey Thompson Koo Wee Rup 7 Aimee Wright Bunyip 6 Brooke Anderson Koo Wee Rup 6 Lawri Piera Phillip Island 6 Gemma Stacey Cora Lynn 6 Sarah Welch Cora Lynn 5 Marni Purvis Inverloch-Kongwak 5 Kelly Boyd Inverloch-Kongwak 5 Jasmin Mackie Bunyip 5 Gemma Thomas Dalyston 4 Ashleight Barnett Koo Wee Rup 4 Kasey Beattie Phillip Island 4 Amber Formosa Phillip Island 4 Olivia Hunt Bunyip 4 Stephanie Hermans Phillip Island 4 Emily Azzopardi Inverloch-Kongwak 4 Letetia Herbert Cora Lynn 4 Rebecca Kinna Garfield 3 Sam Hodge Inverloch-Kongwak 3 Hayley Pupetti Inverloch-Kongwak 3 Chloe
    [Show full text]
  • Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road – Stage 1A
    Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road – Stage 1A (Koo Wee Rup Bypass) Incorporated Document VicRoads September 2012 Incorporated document pursuant to section 6(2)(j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is an incorporated document in the Schedule to Clause 52.03 and Clause 81 of the Cardinia Planning Scheme pursuant to section 6(2)(j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. It consists of the written provisions of this document and the attached project area plans. Pursuant to Clause 52.03 of the Cardinia Planning Scheme, the land identified in this document may be developed in accordance with the specific controls contained in the document. The controls in this document prevail over any contrary or inconsistent provision in the Cardinia Planning Scheme. The Incorporated Document provides planning approval to allow the construction of Stage 1A of the upgrading of the Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road between the Pakenham Bypass and the South Gippsland Highway provided the conditions in the Incorporated Document are met. No further planning approval is required to use and develop the land generally in accordance with the Incorporated Document. The Incorporated Document applies to Stage 1A of the project only with the additional stages requiring further planning approval at the relevant time. 2.0 LAND DESCRIPTION The control in Section 5.0 of this document applies to the land required for Stage 1A of the upgrading of Healesville – Koo Wee Rup Road between the Pakenham Bypass and the South Gippsland Highway. The land for the whole project including Stage 1A is shown as “Project Area” on the plans attached to this document.
    [Show full text]