Sea 5000 Future Frigate Progress Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sea 5000 Future Frigate Progress Report AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT APRIL 2020 VOL.46 NO.3 SEA 5000 FUTURE FRIGATE PROGRESS REPORT ARAFURA CLASS RAAF RAN OPV WEAPONS OPTIMISTIC ABOUT SURFACE FLEET & SENSORS TRITON PURCHASE COMMUNICATIONS HIGHER LONGER AMRAAM Extended Range (AMRAAM ER) – a low risk and affordable addition to the proven NASAMS system. AMRAAM ER expands current NASAMS System capabilities and intercepts targets at significantly higher altitudes and longer ranges A powerful missile mix with current AMRAAM – one system – one launcher – same logistics kongsberg.com CONTENTS Print Post Approved PP349181/00104 Managing Director/Publisher Marilyn Tangye Butler Phone: +61 (0) 410 529 324 Email: [email protected] AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT APRIL 2020 VOL.46 NO.3 FEATURES Editor Kym Bergmann 12 FUTURE FRIGATE PROGRESS REPORT Phone: +61(0)412 539 106 SEA 5000 Hunter class to be part of an ASW network Email: [email protected] FUTURE FRIGATE PROGRESS REPORT Contributors Vladimir Karnozov 16 RAN INVESTING IN WORLD CLASS Arie Egozi MISSILE DEFENCE Mark Farrer Mike Yeo Few nations have a similar level of capability Geoff Slocombe George Galdorisi 20 ARAFURA CLASS WEAPONS AND SENSORS Australia A modest solution with growth potential Ventura Media Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd PO Box 88, Miranda NSW 1490 Australia ABN 76 095 476 065 ARAFURA CLASS RAAF RAN OPV WEAPONS OPTIMISTIC ABOUT SURFACE FLEET 24 SEA 1654 - AUXILIARY OILER & SENSORS TRITON PURCHASE COMMUNICATIONS REPLENISHMENT SHIPS Singapore Extending the range of the RAN Raymond Boey HMAS Stuart sails through rough seas in the Bass Strait during Regional Manager Fleet Certification Period 2020. Fleet Certification Period 2020 Block 729 #04-4280 Ang Mo Kio (FCP20) is a major fleet training activity hosted by the Royal Avenue 6, Singapore 560729 Australian Navy (RAN) and supported by the Royal Australian Air 25 AUSTRALIA STILL COMMITTED TO MQ-4C Phone: +65 6457 2340 Fax: +65 6456 2700 Force (RAAF). It is the RAN’s first major training exercise for the year Despite the threat of a 2-year funding freeze Email: [email protected] and focuses on mid-intensity high-end warfighting. Credit: CoA / Jarrod Mulvihill KONSBERG Subscriptions 26 1ST PERSON INTERVIEW Rose Jeffree Graeme Nayler, MD Land, Babcock Australia Phone: + 61 (0)2 9526 7188 Fax: + 61 (0)2 9526 1779 REGULARS Email: [email protected] 04 EDITOR'S LETTER 30 MINE COUNTER MEASURES – A GIANT LEAP ADVERTISING OFFICES: COVID-19 and potentially catastrophic OF FAITH regional consequences Has the RAN botched the strategy? 2 Australia, NZ & Asia Pacific Graham Joss Sales Director Phone +61 2 9526 7188 NEWS 34 10TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST RAAF Fax +61 2 9526 1779 SUPER HORNETS Mobile +61 (0) 419 492 836 06 First production-representative MQ-9B flight Email: [email protected] And they might be around for a lot longer 08 Boeing’s Loyal Wingman program achieves than planned USA, Canada & South America Susan Spilman-Gardner major milestone Phone: +1 817-751-5888 Email: [email protected] HMS Audacious sets sail for home base 36 RAN SURFACE SHIP COMMUNICATIONS A vital and increasing capability Europe 09 CAE mission simulator for Predator now Diana Scogna Mobile: +33 6 6252 2547 in service Fax: +33 1 7079 0534 40 RUSSIA’S HYPERSONIC ZIRCON MISSILE Email: [email protected] 10 Naval shipbuilding industry to tap workers Soon to be deployed to the Asia Pacific displaced by COVID-19 Israel Asa Talbar Raytheon and United Technologies 46 NEWS FROM ACROSS THE TASMAN Talbar Media Phone: +972-77-562-1900 complete merger Our regular update Fax: +972-77-562-1903 Email: [email protected] Printer Times Printers READ APDR: ANYTIME, ANYWHERE. ISSN 1446-6880 REGISTER NOW! Design Follow us on twitter: @APDR_APAC FOR YOUR MOBILE FRIENDLY APDR ONLINE Stun Media Facebook: Asia Pacific Defence Reporter Email: [email protected] (APDR) www.asiapacificdefencereporter.com Contributor’s opinions do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or editor and while every precaution has been taken to ensure that the information contained in this publication is accurate and timely, no liability is accepted by the publisher or editor for errors and omissions, however caused. Articles and information contained in this publication are the copyright of Asia Pacific Defence Publications Pty Ltd (unless otherwise stated) and cannot be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher. The publisher cannot accept responsibility for loss or damage to uncommissioned photographs, manuscripts or other media. © Ventura Media Asia Pacific Pty Ltd 2019 Asia Pacific Defence Reporter APR 2020 3 EDITOR'S LETTER COVID-19 AND POTENTIALLY CATASTROPHIC REGIONAL CONSEQUENCES to cooperate with the outside world in providing health care. The further you go from Java, the less details about the unfolding pandemic, guaranteeing are the chances of finding adequately staffed and that international responses started weeks later equipped hospitals. than should have been the case. China covered up The long-term consequences for Indonesia if because of fears of international embarrassment COVID-19 gets out of hand will be disruptive and and an instinct to suppress negative information; the serious. There will be large numbers of deaths and the Trump administration engaged in something similar – economic disruption could be huge, with a massive KYM BERGMANN // CANBERRA and the effort seems ongoing – in an attempt to boost downturn in global trade expected – as well as big hits the value of the stock market. in areas that particularly effect the country: tourism aking predictions about the long-term Countries that moved quickly and decisively are and the low price of oil. With this sort of dislocation consequences of the pandemic are difficult the ones that seem to be doing the best: Singapore; – combined with Jakarta’s lacklustre performance M because we are still in the midst of an Taiwan and South Korea topped that list – though to date – comes the possibility of severe social unfolding disaster – the end date of which is almost none of them are completely out of the woods yet. and political unrest in all parts of the country. The impossible to predict. The consequences for Australia Japan had a similarly firm response, but with a far reverberations could be felt for years. have already been considerable, but with a good health larger population and huge, packed urban areas the Ironically – given that China is responsible for the care system, relatively rapid bi-partisan response and task is more difficult. scale of the problem – it is Beijing that could be RAFAEL a generally educated, dispersed population, we are in In Australia’s immediate region, the picture is Indonesia’s saviour with the transfer of equipment and good shape to slow down the spread of the virus to complex and disturbing. New Zealand has done an know how. No less a figure than President Xi himself a manageable level. Things could still go wrong – for excellent job to date. The big worry is Indonesia, with during an April 5 phone call with Jokowi said that example if people in cities start to disregard social Papua New Guinea and the Pacific Island nations not China regarded helping Indonesia as a priority. Large distancing requirements in large numbers. far behind. While enormously different in population quantities of medical supplies have already started to 5 However, even though Australia is an island we are sizes, all share the problems of starting late and having flow by military transport, including disposable masks, still connected to the rest of the world, particularly inadequate healthcare facilities. N-95 masks, protective clothing, goggles, gloves, by trade, business, tourism and education. These Unfortunately for Indonesia’s 270 million people, the shoe covers, infrared thermometers and surgical caps. connections cannot be terminated without having country’s leadership – up to and including President In essence, China has declared partial victory over the the most profound effect on our quality of living – Jokowi Widodo – appeared to be in a state of pandemic and says it is now ready to come to the help meaning that what happens beyond our shores has collective denial, refusing improbably for many weeks of others. It will be a long time before the U.S. is able to consequences for us. If Australia controls COVID-19 to concede that the country had even a single case. return to a similar supportive role in the region. but is running out of control elsewhere, we are all still Health Minister Terawan Agus Putranto continued to While for the moment Australian politicians appear in trouble. insist until early March that everyone was safe because to be entirely focussed on local events – which is to The U.S. is currently the largest concern, with of the power of prayer. With hindsight it is clear that a be expected – hopefully they will not lose sight of the the virus continuing to spread in the absence of major problem existed even back then – and trying to bigger picture. The entire basis of the so-called Pacific a coordinated national response from the Trump quantify what is happening now is difficult because of step-up is in response to growing Chinese influence administration - which has said that all of the States poor communication and an absence of testing. and a recognition that we needed to do much more. are on their own. The previous epicentre of China Despite Indonesia’s 20 years of uninterrupted History might be about to repeat itself, this time on the looks to be bringing things slowly back to normal, economic growth after the Asian financial crisis most back of a pandemic. Australia’s aid budget remains with the city of Wuhan – where it all started and of the country is still desperately poor, apart from low – but hopefully the Government will find the was outrageously covered up by the Government – some pockets of prosperity in places like Jakarta means to increase assistance to our much poorer ending the lockdown and restarting domestic and and Bali.
Recommended publications
  • Voice Pipe June 2021
    TINGIRA AUSTRALIA TINGIRA AUSTRALIA VOICEPIPE JUNE 2021 TINGIRA Welcome National Committee BRAD MURPHY Tingira President ANZAC DAY National Roundup JOHN JRTS Billy Stokes PERRYMAN 1st Intake 2021 Stonehaven Medal TINGIRA.ORG.AU PATRON CHAIRMAN VADM Russ Crane Lance Ker AO, CSM, RANR QLD ACT TINGIRA NATIONAL COMMITTEE 2021 - 2024 PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SECRETARY TREASURER Brad Murphy - QLD Chris Parr - NSW Mark Lee - NSW David Rafferty - NSW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE Darryn Rose - NSW Jeff Wake - WA Graeme Hunter - VIC Paul Kalajzich - WA Kevin Purkis - QLD TINGIRA AUSTRALIA VOICEPIPE JUNE 2021 DISTRIBUTION & CORRESPONDENCE E. [email protected] W. tingira.org.au • All official communication and correspondence for Tingira Australia Association to be sent in writing (email) to the Association Secretary, only via email format is accepted. • No other correspondence (social media) in any format will be recognised or answered • VoicePipe is published 2-3 times annually on behalf of the Committee for the Tingira Australia Association Inc, for members and friends of CS & NSS Sobraon, HMAS Tingira, HMAS Leeuwin and HMAS Cerberus Junior Recruit Training Schemes FRONT COVER • VoicePipe is not for sale or published as a printed publication John Perryman with his • Electronic on PDF, website based, circulation refurbished antique 25 cm worldwide Admiralty Pattern 3860A signalling projector • Editors - Secretary & Tingira Committee • Copyright - Tingira Australia Association Inc. Photograph 1 January 2011 Meredith Perryman WHEEL to MIDSHIPS Welcome - Tingira National Committee ife is like a rolling predict that we move through stone, well so be the rest of 2021 with more L it. confidence on life than the Here at Tingira, we don’t experience of the 2020 Covid “ year.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 32 Department of Defence
    Defence Submission to the Standing Committee on State Development Inquiry into Defence Industry in New South Wales Summary 1. Defence welcomes the New South Wales (NSW) Government’s and Parliament’s interest in strengthening local defence industry to support Australia’s defence and national security. With the release of the 2016 Defence White Paper, Integrated Investment Program, and Defence Industry Policy Statement on 25 February 2016 and the Naval Shipbuilding Plan on 16 May 2017, there is clear direction to implement a major renewal of Defence capability and with it a strengthening of Australia’s defence industry. The scale and long-term nature of Defence’s requirements, including in areas such as the continuous naval shipbuilding programs, require a national approach and partnership between Defence and State and Territory Governments. 2. Australia’s industrial base is a fundamental enabler of Australia’s military capabilities, and an integral element of the nation’s defence. Defence welcomes the announcement of the NSW Government’s Defence and Industry Strategy – Strong, Smart and Connected and the establishment of Defence NSW. Defence also welcomes increasing collaboration between NSW and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) in the defence sector. 3. Through new and expanded policies and programs, Defence is supporting Australia’s defence industry to develop the right technology, skills and capabilities to meet Defence’s current and future needs. There are considerable opportunities for local defence industry to contribute to Defence, with accompanying economic and community benefits. Ensuring that NSW businesses are aware of the opportunities and can leverage the support available from Defence and the broader Commonwealth is an important objective for collaboration between Defence, the NSW Government, and NSW industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Update: August 2018
    Australian Update: August 2018 Dr. Robbin Laird, Research Fellow, Williams Foundation, Canberra THE AUSTRALIAN NEW SUBMARINE PROGRAM: CLEARLY A WORK IN PROGRESS 3 AUSTRALIA BROADENS ITS MILITARY RELATIONSHIPS WITH SHIPBUILDING DEALS 7 THE COMMANDER OF THE RAAF AIR WARFARE CENTRE, AIR COMMODORE “JOE” IERVASI 10 THE AUSTRALIANS SHAPE THEIR WAY AHEAD ON ASW: THE KEY ROLE OF THE P-8 13 FLEET BASE EAST: A KEY ELEMENT IN THE AUSTRALIAN NAVY’S OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES 16 THE AEGIS GLOBAL ENTERPRISE: THE AUSTRALIAN CASE 21 APPENDIX: THE AIR WARFARE DESTROYER ALLIANCE 23 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HOBART CLASS DESTROYERS 24 THE HOBART CLASS – DIFFERENCES FROM THE F100 CLASS 25 DR. BEN GREENE, ELECTRICAL OPTICAL SYSTEMS 26 APPENDIX 30 PITCH BLACK 2018: RAAF PERSPECTIVES 31 THE AUSTRALIAN ARMY AND INTEGRATED AIR DEFENSE 34 APPENDIX: 35 LOOKING BACK AT RIMPAC 2018: THE PERSPECTIVE OF AIR COMMODORE CRAIG HEAP 36 SHAPING ENHANCED SOVEREIGN OPTIONS: LEVERAGING THE INTEGRATED FORCE BUILDING PROCESS 40 THE DEFENSE OF AUSTRALIA: LOOKING BACK AND LEANING FORWARD 43 2 The Australian New Submarine Program: Clearly A Work in Progress 8/19/18 Canberra, Australia During my current visit to Australia, I have been able to follow up the discussions with the Chief of Navy over the past three years with regard to shipbuilding and shaping a way ahead for the Royal Australian Navy. During this visit I had a chance to visit the Osborne shipyards and get an update on Collins class and enhanced availability as well as to get a briefing and discussion with senior Australian officials involved in shaping the new build submarine program.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Test and Evaluation, HMAS Canberra: Assessing the ADF’S New Maritime Role 2 Enhanced Capability
    Original Article Operational Test and Evaluation, HMAS Canberra: Assessing the ADF’s New Maritime Role 2 Enhanced Capability Commander Neil Westphalen, RANR Introduction However, although Canberra’s commissioning formally transferred responsibility for the ship from The first of two Landing Helicopter Dock (LHD) ships her builders to the RAN, she still required an Initial commissioned into the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) Operational Capability (IOC) evaluation� The purpose as HMAS Canberra (L02) on 28 November 2014�, of the evaluation was to assess the ADF’s ability to Among their other attributes, the LHDs bring a undertake amphibious Humanitarian Aid / Disaster Maritime Role 2 Enhanced (MR2E) seagoing health Relief (HA/DR) and Non-combatant Evacuation capability to the Australian Defence Force (ADF) Operations (NEO), at a level of capability that was for the first time, and with a significantly greater generally analogous to what had previously been capacity, since the Landing Platform Amphibious provided by the LPAs� This entailed an escalating (LPA) Fleet units HMA Ships Kanimbla and Manoora series of exercise-based and other assessments over decommissioned in 2011�, 12 months, which culminated in an Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E), conducted off Cowley Beach QLD, from 30 September to 05 October 2015� Canberra’s IOC evaluation is the prelude to a Full Operational Capability (FOC) evaluation, due to be conducted in October 2017� The purpose of the FOC evaluation will be to assess the ADF’s ability to undertake a range of higher
    [Show full text]
  • Civilians: the Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet
    Chief of Navy Essay Competition The Youth Division (MacDougall Prize) Civilians: The Fulcrum for a Modern Fleet “We need to think differently […] by reviewing our basic operating concepts, reimagining the way that Navy should view itself in the twenty-first century, re-examining our assumptions and, most importantly, re-engineering our modus operandi…”1 – Vice Admiral Tim Barrett AO CSC RAN On 3rd September 1939 Australia declared war on Germany and by 1941 was seeking innovative ways to sustain the war effort at sea. This need served as the genesis of two important augmentations to the Royal Australian Navy (RAN): the Women’s Royal Australian Naval Service (WRANS) in April2 and the Naval Auxiliary Patrol (NAP) that June3. This essay will briefly identify the role played by the aforementioned services in supplementing an RAN stretched for resources before identifying similar challenges in the Navy of today. It will then explore the possibility of rectifying this by increasing the use of civilian support across the RAN, such as through the introduction of a modern Australian Fleet Auxiliary. Spread across the globe, the RAN realised it would need to do everything it could to maximise the availability of her sailors and warships while continuing to maintain a suitable presence on the home front. For this reason, both the WRANS and NAP would target those not eligible to serve in conflict at sea. Officer Commanding Sydney Naval Establishments Commodore Muirhead-Gould was quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald on the 4th November 1941 as saying the NAP “would not release any member from any other kind of service under the laws of the Commonwealth” and that, while “applications for enrolment were being received from unmarried men under 35 […] these men could be enrolled in the patrol only if they were in reserve occupations or medically unfit”4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Naval Architect
    THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 HMAS Adelaide preparing to embark United States Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles during Exercise Rim of the Pacific 18 (RIMPAC 2018), Hawaii, in July. HMAS Adelaide unexpectedly took a lead role in the amphibious phase of RIMPAC when the US Navy assault ship planned for that role suffered mechanical problems and remained in Pearl Harbour for most of the exercise. HMAS Adelaide led HMA Ships Success, Melbourne and Toowoomba across the Pacific to take part in this major exercise which involved 25 nations, 46 surface ships, five submarines, 17 land forces, and more than 200 aircraft and 25 000 personnel. This major international exercise is held every two years (RAN photograph) THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Journal of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (Australian Division) Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 Cover Photo: CONTENTS An impression of BAE Systems’ Global Com- 2 From the Division President bat Ship — Australia, selected as the preferred 3 Editorial design for Australia’s new frigates 4 Letter to the Editor (Image courtesy Department of Defence) 4 Coming Events The Australian Naval Architect is published four times per 5 News from the Sections year. All correspondence and advertising copy should be 15 Classification Society News sent to: The Editor 17 From the Crows Nest The Australian Naval Architect 18 General News c/o RINA PO Box No. 462 36 The Acquisition of a Multi-role Aviation Jamison Centre, ACT 2614 Training Vessel for the Royal Australian AUSTRALIA Navy — Alex Robbins email: [email protected] 39 Upgrade or Replace: A Cost Comparison The deadline for the next edition of The Australian Na- val Architect (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Naval Shipbuilding Enterprise
    AUSTRALIA’S NAVAL SHIPBUILDING ENTERPRISE Preparing for the 21st Century JOHN BIRKLER JOHN F. SCHANK MARK V. ARENA EDWARD G. KEATING JOEL B. PREDD JAMES BLACK IRINA DANESCU DAN JENKINS JAMES G. KALLIMANI GORDON T. LEE ROGER LOUGH ROBERT MURPHY DAVID NICHOLLS GIACOMO PERSI PAOLI DEBORAH PEETZ BRIAN PERKINSON JERRY M. SOLLINGER SHANE TIERNEY OBAID YOUNOSSI C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1093 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9029-4 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Australian government will produce a new Defence White Paper in 2015 that will outline Australia’s strategic defense objectives and how those objectives will be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Call the Hands
    CALL THE HANDS Issue No.24 October 2018 From the President Welcome to this month’s issue of Call the Hands. Our aim is to provide members and the community with news of contemporary and historical events as well as information on services provided by the Society. These services are best accessed through our comprehensive website and Facebook page. The arrival of the Royal Australian Navy’s second Hobart-class air warfare destroyer, NUSHIP Brisbane in Sydney on 10 September reminds us not just of Australia’s significant warship building program (3 destroyers, 12 submarines, 9 frigates and 12 Offshore Patrol Vessels) but the significance of the RAN in world terms. Ranked 54th in terms of vessel numbers the RAN is ranked 21st in terms of capability according to the annual Global Fire Power review. The fleet, unlike many navies maintains a busy schedule of strategically significant operations, exercises and engagement activities which help shape Australia’s international relations and our history in the longer term. Recent examples include the Indo-Pacific Endeavour tour by HMA Ships Adelaide and Toowoomba and Success to south west Pacific countries and current north-east Asia deployment by HMA Ships Huon and Gascoyne, the longest deployment for Mine Hunter Coastals to date. Such deployments are fundamental to relations with Australia’s regional neighbours. Linked to deployments of this nature was the 5 September announcement by the Minister for Australian foreign affairs to establish a ‘Pacific Fusion Centre’. This centre will analyse information to strengthen maritime awareness and provide information to Pacific decision makers responding to security threats, such as illegal fishing, people smuggling and narcotics trafficking.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955
    Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 - 2018 Part 4: Europe & Canada Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 4: Europe & Canada. The other parts are: Part 1: Introduction Part 2A: United States - Submarines Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications.
    [Show full text]
  • We Envy No Man on Earth Because We Fly. the Australian Fleet Air
    We Envy No Man On Earth Because We Fly. The Australian Fleet Air Arm: A Comparative Operational Study. This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Murdoch University 2016 Sharron Lee Spargo BA (Hons) Murdoch University I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. …………………………………………………………………………….. Abstract This thesis examines a small component of the Australian Navy, the Fleet Air Arm. Naval aviators have been contributing to Australian military history since 1914 but they remain relatively unheard of in the wider community and in some instances, in Australian military circles. Aviation within the maritime environment was, and remains, a versatile weapon in any modern navy but the struggle to initiate an aviation branch within the Royal Australian Navy was a protracted one. Finally coming into existence in 1947, the Australian Fleet Air Arm operated from the largest of all naval vessels in the post battle ship era; aircraft carriers. HMAS Albatross, Sydney, Vengeance and Melbourne carried, operated and fully maintained various fixed-wing aircraft and the naval personnel needed for operational deployments until 1982. These deployments included contributions to national and multinational combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian operations. With the Australian government’s decision not to replace the last of the aging aircraft carriers, HMAS Melbourne, in 1982, the survival of the Australian Fleet Air Arm, and its highly trained personnel, was in grave doubt. This was a major turning point for Australian Naval Aviation; these versatile flyers and the maintenance and technical crews who supported them retrained on rotary aircraft, or helicopters, and adapted to flight operations utilising small compact ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 48, December 2020
    From the President Welcome to this edition of Call the Hands, our last in the Society’s 50th anniversary year. It includes a variety of short articles which are connected through various themes including the RAN’s first ship, HMAS Parramatta (I) and her namesakes. Another connection is the shared anniversary of the Naval Association of Australia (NAA) celebrating its 100th anniversary. Accordingly, we acknowledge our many readers who are members of the NAA. Their service in the RAN (past and present) has contributed to the history of Australia’s great Navy. The Society’s close connection with Parramatta (I) stems from the not insignificant project to recover her bow and stern sections from a Hawksbury River mudflat. These sections are now prominently displayed in Sydney. Additional information about this fascinating project recently came to light and has been published in the December Naval Historical Review now being distributed to members. We also feature a recent NAA commemorative service for HMAS Parramatta (II) and recognition of the commissioning commanding officer of HMAS Parramatta (III), Rear Admiral Guy Griffiths RAN, Rtd. Many interesting and sometimes obscure naval stories remain untold. Occasional paper 97 is a good example. It is the story of a small party of sailors landed in Arnhem Land from HMAS Fremantle (I) in 1958 to observe Japanese pearl fishing operations. This story was shared by Eric Deshon with Australian National Maritime Museum’s oral history volunteers and published in the ANMM’s volunteer newsletter ‘All Hands’ in June 2018. Recording historic events on canvas has been a traditional art form which continues today.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain John Denison, D.S.O., R.N. Oct
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 27. 1st 6th Captain John Denison, D.S.O., R.N. Oct. Oct. B. 25 May 1853, Rusholine, Toronto, 7th child; 5th Son of George Taylor Denison (B. 1904 1906. Ontario, Canada. – D. 9 Mar 1939, 17 Jul 1816, Toronto, Ontario, Canada -D. 30 Mason Toronto, York, Ontario, Canada. B. May 1873, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) [Lawyer, 1 Oct 1904 North York, York County, Ontario, Colonel, General, later minister of Church) and Canada. (aged 85 years). Mary Anne Dewson (B. 24 May 1817, Enniscorthy, Ireland -D. 1900, Toronto, 1861 Census for Saint Patrick's Ontario, Canada). Married 11 Dec 1838 at St Ward, Canada West, Toronto, shows James Church. Toronto, Canada John Denison living with Denison family aged 9. Canada Issue: West>Toronto. In all they had 11 children; 8 males (sons) and 3 It is surmised that John Denison females (daughters). actually joined the Royal Navy in 18 Jul 1878 – John Denison married Florence Canada. Ledgard, B. 12 May 1857, Chapel town, 14 May 1867-18 Dec 1868 John Yorkshire, -D. 1936, Hampshire, England. Denison, aged 14 years, attached to daughter of William Ledgard (1813-1876) H.M.S. “Britannia” as a Naval Cadet. [merchant] and Catherina Brooke (1816-1886) “Britannia” was a wooden screw st at Roundhay, St John, Yorkshire, England. Three decker 1 rate ship, converted to screw whilst still on her stocks. Issue: (5 children, 3 males and 2 females). Constructed and launched from 1. John Everard Denison (B. 20 Apr 1879, Portsmouth Dockyard on 25 Jan Toronto, Ontario, Canada - D.
    [Show full text]