DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetland Conservation in the Wilson Inlet Catchment, WA a Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetland Conservation in the Wilson Inlet Catchment, WA a Report etland Conservation in the ilson Inlet Catchment, A Management of selected suites: Assessment and Recommendations A report produced by Green Skills for South Coast Natural Resource Management by etlands Project Manager, Tim Frodsham October, 2007 etland Conservation in the ilson Inlet Catchment, A Management of selected suites: Assessment and Recommendations by etlands Project Manager, Tim Frodsham October, 2007 cover photo: Denmark River confluence with Wilson Inlet Estuary) Acknowledgements This plan was prepared by Greenskills, with the help of the Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee, the Department of Water in Albany, South Coast Natural Resource Management SCNRM), and the assistance of the Shire of Denmark. The Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee WICC) were a key stakeholder in the formulation of this plan. Membership of the Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee was as below: Tom, Zwartkruis, Treasurer Glen, Clode, Community Pam, Sounness, Community Bill, Sounness, Community Bill , Hollingworth, Community Basil, Schur, Community Melinda, Lyons, proxy Ron, Master, Ex-Officio Steve, May, Ex-Officio David, Rushton, proxy Greg , Bunker, Ex-Officio Craig, Carter, CPO Lynn, Heppell, NRMO Murray, Hollingworth, CPO Government stakeholders The Department of Water’s Albany branch contributed technically and logistically to this plan’s preparation. Valuable contributions were made by people within this branch, but particularly Tracy Calvert, Sherrie Randell, Ania Lorenz, David Rushton, Adam Lillicrap, Department of Agriculture and Food, DAFWA) Albany, played an important role in filling knowledge gaps in understanding acid sulfate soils around the wetlands of this catchment. Valuable catchment geomorphology information and hydrology assistance came from Ruhi Ferdowsian, regional hydrologist DAFWA, Albany). Non-Government stakeholders Justin Bellanger, of SCNRM was helpful in the structure and formulation of late drafts of this report. The Denmark Weed Action Group also conducted a separate survey for weed inventory and management for this report. Thanks goes to the DWAG for this data. Those people who collected and collated this information are: Nadine Lapthorne, Bob Fenwick, and Diane Harwood. Community stakeholders Michael Hamblin, Garth Wilson, Mark Parre, Andrew Dickinson, Robert Churches, Alan Francis, Trevor & Phyllis Barker, Wayne Bail, Vivian Hall, Norm Hill, Arthur Paterson, Daryl Drage, Dianne and Bill Bentley, Dory Landegraaft, Des Houden. Other acknowledgments: Support and funding and digital information through South Coast Natural Resource Management SCNRM), and the Federal Governments’ Natural Heritage Trust NHT) and National Action Plan NAP). Technical support and digital information from Department of Water, Landgate Department for Land Information). Aerial photography by Tim Frodsham and Craig Carter. Weed inventory of selected wetland sites by Di Harwood, Nadine Lapthorne, and Bob Fenwick. Proof reading of draft and final versions of report by Justin Bellanger, Water Facilitator, South Coast Natural Resource Management SCNRM), and by Patrick Gillespie. All other people who assisted in any manner with the production of the report including Green Skills, Department of Environment and Conservation DEC), and Department of Agriculture Staff, in Albany, and David Forrest of Ashburton Air Services. The author would especially like to thank staff at the Albany branch of the Department of Water for their very helpful assistance and provision of background material for this report. Similar thanks go to Basil Schur for his many forms of assistance. The Management Plan draws on the previous inventory for the wetlands it focuses on, and background papers, published reports and oral accounts which assist the plan. The author thanks all the contributors of these documents. o you have any comments or feedback you would like to give? This report is intended to generate community discussion as to the most effective management practices that can be incorporated into the catchment planning activities of the Wetland Systems of the Wilson Inlet Catchment. If you have any comments on the recommendations provided in this report, we would like to hear from you. Comments can be directed to: Tim Frodsham Wetlands Project Manager P.O. Box 577, Denmark W.A. 6333 Ph: 08) 98 48 3310 Email [email protected] Web www.greenskills.green.net.au Mobile: 0437 617 292 Endorsements The following agencies and groups endorse this management plan and will work cooperatively together in its implementation to ensure that these wetlands’ environmental values are protected and enhanced. Naomi Arrowsmith Regional Manager, Department of Water, Albany Kim Barrow, Denmark Shire President Alison Goode, Mayor of Albany Kevin Forbes Plantagenet Shire President John Blake Regional Manager, Resource Management Department of Agriculture John Watson Regional Manager Regional Manager Conservation and Land Management Patrick Weadon Chairman South Coast Natural Resource Management 1.0 Executive Summary The following management report provides both an inventory of current information and a snapshot appraisal of the state of 19 various wetlands in the catchment of the Wilson Inlet estuarine system, in the great southern region of Western Australia. These wetland systems are situated in various areas up to 60 km away from the Wilson Inlet. The report is intended to be viewed as part of our ongoing understanding of these wetlands, some of which have little data available. It covers: how they originated, what processes are operating within each system, the values of each wetland, and whether these values are threatened. Resource Condition Targets RCTs) are provided, along with other recommendations and future strategies for ensuring land use productivity and wetland conservation. A tabulated list of management recommendations for each wetland is also provided. Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary...............................................................................................32 2.0!!Project background and purpose ...........................................................................33 3.0 Geomorphology ....................................................................................................34 4.0 Land tenure and Use .............................................................................................34 5.0 Indigenous Significance........................................................................................34 6.0 Physical characteristics .........................................................................................34 7.0 Biological and chemical characteristics................................................................35 8.0 Threats...................................................................................................................36 9.0 Site assessments....................................................................................................37 10.0!!!Lake Saide ..........................................................................................................37 10.1.1 Location ............................................................................................................37 10.1.2 Geomorphology ................................................................................................38 10.1.4 Indigenous Significance....................................................................................38 10.1.5 Physical characteristics .....................................................................................38 10.1.6 Biological characteristics..................................................................................39 10.1.7 Chemical characteristics ...................................................................................39 10.1.8 Threats...............................................................................................................39 10.2 Blue Lake.............................................................................................................40 10.2.1 Location ............................................................................................................40 10.2.2 Geomorphology ................................................................................................40 10.2.3 Land tenure and Us ...........................................................................................40 10.2.4 Indigenous Significance....................................................................................40 10.2.5 Physical characteristics .....................................................................................40 10.2.6 Biological characteristics..................................................................................41 10.2.7 Chemical characteristics ...................................................................................41 10.2.8 Threats...............................................................................................................41 10.3 Amarillup Swamp ................................................................................................41 10.3.1 Location ............................................................................................................40 10.3.2 Geomorphology ................................................................................................41 10.3.3 Land Tenure and Use........................................................................................41 10.3.4 Indigenous Significance....................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Denmark River Catchment Area Drinking Water Source Protection Assessment
    DENMARK RIVER CATCHMENT AREA DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION ASSESSMENT DENMARK TOWN WATER SUPPLY 2004 Acknowledgements This ASSESSMENT was prepared by the Infrastructure Planning Branch of the Water Corporation at the request of the Department of Environment. Contribution Personnel Title Organisation Project Direction Peter Coghlan Supervising Engineer Water Corporation Report preparation David Boyd Principal Engineering Consultant Water Corporation Drafting Stephen Hart Planning Information Officer Water Corporation Project Liaison Stephen Watson Program Manager, Department of Environment Water Source Protection Branch For more information on the Denmark Town Water Supply Scheme contact: Water Corporation Infrastructure Planning Branch 629 Newcastle Street LEEDERVILLE WA 6007 Telephone: (08) 9420 2380 Facsimile: (08) 9420 3179 For more information on the Water Source Protection process contact: Department of Environment Water Source Protection Branch Department of Environment 3 Plain Street EAST PERTH WA 6004 Telephone: (08) 9278 0300 Facsimile: (08) 9278 0585 Printed on Recyclable stock December, 2004 Cover Photograph: Denmark Dam and Reservoir [taken by David Boyd] Purpose of this Assessment A safe drinking water supply is critical to the wellbeing of the community. Effective catchment protection is fundamental to minimising risks to public health and the cost of supplying water to consumers. This document presents an initial assessment of the risks to water quality in Denmark River Catchment Area. It is the first stage in the production of a Drinking Water Source Protection Plan for the catchment. The Water Corporation is committed to supplying the safest drinking water to its customers that is practicable. It recognises protecting Public Drinking Water Source Areas (PDWSA - i.e. surface water and groundwater catchments) is the most critical component of its Drinking Water Quality Management System.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Heritage Places – Assessment Documentation
    REGISTER OF HERITAGE PLACES – ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION 11. ASSESSMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE The criteria adopted by the Heritage Council in November 1996 have been used to determine the cultural heritage significance of the place. PRINCIPAL AUSTRALIAN HISTORIC THEME(S) • 3.5 Developing primary production • 3.8 Moving goods and people • 3.8. 4 Making economic use of inland waterways • 3.11 .5 Establishing water supplies • 3.14 .1 Using Australian materials in construction • 8.10 .5 Advancing knowledge in science and technology HERITAGE COUNCIL OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA THEME(S) • 112 Technology and technological change • 201 River and sea transport • 203 Road transport • 302 Rural industry & market gardening • 304 Timber industry • 404 Community services & utilities • 405 Sport, recreation and entertainment 11.1 AESTHETIC VALUE* Lower Kalgan River Bridge (1958) is a utilitarian structure that exhibits the characteristics and construction techniques of substantial timber road bridges built between c.1900 and the 1950s that has been changed by the addition of a concrete road deck. (Criterion 1.1) * For consistency, all references to architectural style are taken from Apperly, R., Irving, R., Reynolds, P. A Pictorial Guide to Identifying Australian Architecture. Styles and Terms from 1788 to the Present, Angus and Robertson, North Ryde, 1989. For consistency, all references to garden and landscape types and styles are taken from Ramsay, J. Parks, Gardens and Special Trees: A Classification and Assessment Method for the Register of the National Estate, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1991, with additional reference to Richards, O. Theoretical Framework for Designed Landscapes in WA, unpublished report, 1997. Register of Heritage Places – Assessment Documentation Lower Kalgan River Bridge & Jetty Group 23 May 2008 1 Lower Kalgan River Jetty is a utilitarian structure that exhibits the characteristics and construction techniques of timber jetties and small road and rail bridges built between c.1900 and the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Region Regional Management Plan
    SOUTH COAST REGION REGIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 1992 - 2002 MANAGEMENT PLAN NO. 24 Department of Conservation and Land Management for the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority and the Lands and Forest Commission Western Australia PREFACE Regional management plans are prepared by the Department of Conservation and Land Management on behalf of the Lands and Forest Commission and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority. These two bodies submit the plans for final approval and modification, if required, by the Minister for the Environment. Regional plans are to be prepared for each of the 10 regions administered by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM). This plan for the South Coast Region covers all lands and waters in the Region vested under the CALM Act, together with wildlife responsibilities included in the Wildlife Conservation Act. In addition to the Regional Plan, more detailed management plans will be prepared for certain critical management issues, (the most serious of which is the spread of dieback disease in the Region); particular high value or high conflict areas, (such as some national parks); or for certain exploited or endangered species, (such as kangaroos and the Noisy Scrub-bird). These plans will provide more detailed information and guidance for management staff. The time frame for this Regional Plan is ten years, although review and restatement of some policies may be necessary during this period. Implementation will take place progressively over this period and there will be continuing opportunity for public comment. This management plan was submitted by the Department of Conservation and Land Management and adopted by the Lands and Forest Commission on 12 June 1991 and the National Parks and Nature Conservation Authority on 19 July 1991 and approved by the Minister for the Environment on 23 December 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Adec Preview Generated PDF File
    Records of tile Western Australian Museum 21: 111-127 (2002). Western Australian Triplectidinae (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae): descriptions of the female of Triplectides niveipennis and larvae belonging to four genera Rosalind M. St Clair Environment Protection Authority, Freshwater Sciences, GPO Box 439500 Melbourne 3001, Victoria, Australia email: [email protected] Abstract - Larvae of Condocerus aphiS, Notoperata tenax, Symphitoneuria wheeleri, Triplectides niveipennis, and Triplectides en thesis are described for the first time. The female of Triplectides niveipennis is also described for the first time. Variation in larvae and adults of Triplectides niveipennis is discussed, together with unusual characters in the larvae requiring redefinition of the genus. Minor changes to the generic descriptions of Condocerus, Notoperata and Symphitoneuria are also made. INTRODUCTION specimens are available to resolve problems at this Leptoceridae is a major family of Trichoptera in time. The larvae are unusual and require Western Australia, being both diverse and common. redefinition of the genus. The adult leptocerid fauna of Western Australia is Most specimens examined were collected moderately well known, due largely to the efforts during the Land and Water Resources Research of Arthur Neboiss (1982). The Monitoring River Development Corporation funded Monitoring Health Program has resulted in large numbers of River Health Program and material is to be specimens of larvae available for study to augment lodged in the Western Australian Museum. Site distribution data based on adults. These data data for this material start with MUR for sites indicate three leptocerid faunas in Western sampled by Murdoch University, CALM for Australia; one in the cooler wetter south west, one Department of Conservation and Land in the large rivers of the north, and one in the dry Management, ECU for Edith Cowan University areas with little permanent fresh water.
    [Show full text]
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey
    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Zones of the South West Land Division Western Australia
    Natural Resource Zones of the South West Land Division Western Australia Helen E Allison Environmental Protection Authority Westralia Square 141 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 S. Anne Brandenburg School of Environmental Biology Curtin University BENTLEY WA 6102 Greg R. Beeston Spacial Resource Information Group Land Management Branch Division of Regional Operations WA Department of Agriculture Baron Hay Court SOUTH PERTH WA 6151 ., October 1993 '!I !J Contents Page Summary i 1 . Introduction 1 2. Development of the natural resource zones 1 2.1 Beard's Natural Regions 3 2. 2 Drainage Divisions and River Basins 3 2. 3 Isohyets 6 2.4 Boundary adjustment 6 3. Discussion 10 4. Remnant vegetation data used as an example 12 5 . Acknowledgements 17 6. References 17 Tables 1. The Natural Resource Zones of the South West Land Division, Western Australia 8 2. Beard's natural regions of the South West Land Division, Western Australia 8 3. The drainage divisions and river basins of the South West Land Division, Western Australia 10 4. The rainfall zones of the South West Land Division, Western Australia 10 5. The Natural Resource Zones,ofthe Blackwood River catchment and the percentage of remnant native vegetation in each zone. 16 6. Percentage of remnant native vegetation on private land in each Natural Resource Zone 17 7. Percentage of remnant native vegetation on private land within each rainfall zone 17 Figures 1. Natural Resource Zones of the South West Land Division 2 2. Beard's natural regions 4 3. Drainage divisions and river catchments 5 4. Isohyets and the South West Land Division boundary 7 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Australia Building Flood Resilience in a Changing Climate
    Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate Neil Dufty, Molino Stewart Pty Ltd Andrew Dyer, IAG Maryam Golnaraghi (lead investigator of the flood risk management report series and coordinating author), The Geneva Association Flood Risk Management in Australia 1 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association was created in 1973 and is the only global association of insurance companies; our members are insurance and reinsurance Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Based on rigorous research conducted in collaboration with our members, academic institutions and multilateral organisations, our mission is to identify and investigate key trends that are likely to shape or impact the insurance industry in the future, highlighting what is at stake for the industry; develop recommendations for the industry and for policymakers; provide a platform to our members, policymakers, academics, multilateral and non-governmental organisations to discuss these trends and recommendations; reach out to global opinion leaders and influential organisations to highlight the positive contributions of insurance to better understanding risks and to building resilient and prosperous economies and societies, and thus a more sustainable world. The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Talstrasse 70, CH-8001 Zurich Email: [email protected] | Tel: +41 44 200 49 00 | Fax: +41 44 200 49 99 Photo credits: Cover page—Markus Gebauer / Shutterstock.com December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia © The Geneva Association Published by The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, Zurich. 2 www.genevaassociation.org Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Prioritisation of Waterways for Management In
    Framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia May 2011 Report no. CENRM120 Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management University of Western Australia Unit 1, Foreshore House, Proudlove Parade Albany Western Australia 6332 Telephone +61 8 9842 0837 Facsimile +61 8 9842 8499 www.cenrm.uwa.edu.au This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the University of Western Australia. Reference: Macgregor, C., Cook, B., Farrell, C. and Mazzella, L. 2011. Assessment framework for prioritising waterways for management in Western Australia, Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia, Albany. ISBN: 978-1-74052-236-6 Front cover credit: Bremer River, Eastern South Coast bioregion in May 2006, looking downstream by Geraldine Janicke. Disclaimer This document has been prepared by the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management, University of Western Australia for the Department of Water, Western Australian. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the Centre of Excellence in Natural Resource Management and its employees are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilson Inlet Management Strategy 2013 - 2022 Figure 1: Wilson Inlet Catchment
    Wilson Inlet Management Strategy 2013 - 2022 A Management Strategy to maintain and where possible, enhance the ecological health of the Wilson Inlet Acknowledgements this document was developed by the Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee through lotterywest funding. the Wilson Inlet Management Strategy was prepared by the steering group, comprised of representatives from the Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee, Department of Water, South Coast nrM, Department of Agriculture and Food, Water Corporation, City of Albany, Shire of Denmark, Shire of plantagenet and individual community members. Many individuals were involved in providing technical expertise and input along the way. Special thanks extend to: David Weaver, Miriam lang and ronald Master, Department of Agriculture and Food WA Kirsty Alexander, tracy Calvert and Karen Mckeough, Department of Water Bill Hollingworth, george ebbett, Joe van Vlijmen, Brad Kneebone, Melissa Howe, Arthur patterson and yvette Caruso, local community members. Wendy Bradshaw and Matt Kennewell, South Coast natural resource Management the Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee paul Close, Centre of excellence in natural resource Management lynn Heppell and elissa Stewart, Wilson Inlet Catchment Committee Craig Baru and gemma Maling, Shire of Denmark Dawn pedro, Councillor representative, Shire of Denmark Mark Ford, City of Albany John Dibble, Water Corporation Jackie Manning, Department of environment and Conversation comments invited Comments on the strategy are invited. Comments or further enquiries should be directed
    [Show full text]
  • SHIRE of DENMARK MUNICIPAL HERITAGE INVENTORY I
    SHIRE OF DENMARK MUNICIPAL HERITAGE INVENTORY i SHIRE OF DENMARK MUNICIPAL HERITAGE INVENTORY i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Shire of Denmark wishes to acknowledge the significant contributions of time and knowledge of the following individuals and groups towards the completion of this document. The Municipal Heritage Inventory Revi ew Working Group, consisting of: • Councillor Alex Syme (Chair) • Councillor George Ebbett • Bev McGuinness (Denmark Historical Society) • Fred Scott (Denmark Historical Society) • Gail Guthrie (Kent-Nornalup Ward) • Robert Reynolds (Dept. of Aboriginal Affairs) • Graham Townley (Dept. of Aboriginal Affairs) Other contributors: • Denmark Historical Society • Denmark Public Library • Nornalup Residents and Ratepayers Association • Walpole Nornalup and Districts Historical Society In addition, the Shire of Denmark also acknowledges the contribution of many of the historic photographs by the Denmark Historical Society, and is grateful for the permission to reproduce them. The review of Municipal Inventory was assisted by funds granted under the Local Government Heritage Assistance Program, an initiative of the Heritage Council of WA. Adopted at the Ordinary Council Meeting on 28 June 2011. Original 1999: Leah O’Brian and Cathy Day Consutants. Review 2011: Malcolm Traill (Malcolm Traill History & Heritage) and Jacqui Grieve (Spurr of the Moment Design). Annual review: undertaken in 2014 by the Shire of Denmark’s Municipal Heritage Inventory Advisory Committee and subsequently adopted by Council at Ordinary Meeting on
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark River Water Resource Recovery Plan
    Government of Western Australia Department of Water Denmark River water resource recovery plan Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia PO Box K822 Perth Western Australia 6842 Phone: (08) 6364 7600 Fax: (08) 6364 7601 www.water.wa.gov.au 7339/50/1012 ter needs all our wa g after Lookin Salinity and land use impacts series Report no. SLUI 40 December 2011 Denmark River water resource recovery plan by Brett Ward, Tim Sparks, Graeme Blake Department of Water Salinity and land use impacts series Report no. SLUI 40 December 2011 Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 National Relay Service 13 36 77 www.water.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia 2011 December 2011 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water. ISSN 1447-7394 (print) 1449-5252 (online) ISBN 978-1-921508-77-6 (print) 972-1-921508-78-3 (online) Recommended reference Ward, B, Sparks, T & Blake, G 2011, Denmark River water resource recovery plan, Salinity and land use impacts series, Report no. SLUI 40, Department of Water, Perth. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following for their contribution to this publication: The Kent- Denmark Recovery Team for their hard work early in the recovery process; Mohammed Bari, Geoff Mauger and Renee Dixon for their advice on Denmark catchment processes and assistance with catchment modelling; Mick Owens, Andrew Maughan, Chris Gunby and John Ruprecht for reviewing and providing advice on the greater water resource issues in the Denmark region; and Alex Waterhouse for editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark 2015 - 2020 Albany Highway a 18468 Map Current As at September 2016
    Three Swamps NR R 26162 Pootenup NR A 38303 Beejenup NR R 30526 Western Shield - 1080 Poison Risk Areas Frankland River Balicup Lake NR Denmark 2015 - 2020 Albany Highway A 18468 Map current as at September 2016 kilometres 0 24 6 8 10 kilometres HORIZONTAL DATUM : GEOCENTRIC DATUM OF AUSTRALIA 1994 (GDA94) - ZONE 50 Camel Lake NR Rock Dam A 26161 Nature Reserve Jebarjup NR LEGEND A 26160 A 2079 Stirling Range NP Camel Lake NR Department - Managed Land Other Land Categories Management boundaries A 14792 A 26161 (includes existing and proposed) Other Crown reserves Shire of State forest, timber reserve, Local Government Authority boundary CRAMBROOK miscellaneous reserves and land held under title by the CALM Executive Body REGION Salt Lake NR *Unallocated Crown land (UCL) DPaW region boundary A 25812 National park District DPaW district boundary *Unmanaged Crown reserves (UMR) Geekabee Hill (not vested with any authority) Nature Reserve* Nature reserve Trails Bibbulmun Track Private property, Pastoral leases Twongkup NR A 2096 Conservation park Munda Biddi Trail (cycle) Cape to Cape Walk Track CALM Act sections 5(1)(g), 5(1)(h) reserve *The management and administration of UCL and UMR’s by Shire of Cranbrook & miscellaneous reserve DPaW and the Department of Lands respectively, is agreed Western Shield Warrenup to by the parties in a Memorandum of Understanding. FormerNature leasehold Reserve & CALM Act sections DPaW has on-ground management responsibilty. 16, 16A A& 193133(2) managed lands. Information on areas of 1080 poison risk is accurate as of September 2016. This map does not show other areas of 1080 poison risk on private or other Forest conservation areas DPaW managed lands.
    [Show full text]