DOCSLIB.ORG

Determining Your Place on the Political Spectrum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determining Your Place on the Political Spectrum Determining Your Place on the Political Spectrum The political spectrum is the range of political attitudes of the public, going gradually from extreme to moderate to extreme: radical, liberal, moderate, conservative, and then reactionary. Every individual lies 1 somewhere along this political spectrum, but many do not know exactly where they lie, or they label themselves as something that they may not be entirely. Some even think that they lie nowhere on the political spectrum, because they label themselves as not involved or not feeling strongly about political issues, but the fact is that they are most likely moderate, or maybe they do feel strongly about many political issues but don’t really know it. These labels of “liberal,” “moderate,” “conservative,” “radical” or “reactionary” are often misinterpreted or misunderstood. But generally speaking, “liberal” refers to someone who advocates change, new philosophies 2 and new ideas. “Conservative” describes someone who values tradition, preferring to stick to the tried and true. But these definitions have changed over time, and modern definitions of these political labels are much more complex. Liberals today are very much for individual rights but also lots of government intervention and control. They want everyone to be treated equally, especially concerning health care, gay marriage, immigration and 3 minimum wage. They are very supportive of the poor and lower middle-class, believing that the rich should be taxed highly to help the poor. They believe that the government should protect the people from themselves, banning gun ownership and making unionizing of workers mandatory. They are also pro-choice (for abortion) but believe that the death penalty should be banned. They want to decrease military spending. Conservatives today are for a strong military and taking the necessary actions to protect America, even if it means intervening in other countries preemptively. They are against illegal immigration and want to prevent it as much as possible by building a fence along the border with Mexico. They are pro-life (against abortion) and physician-assisted suicide, and they believe that there should be more faith-based government initiatives, 4 like introducing more religion into schools. They want to cut taxes, keep government out of business and have more capitalistic and free-market policies. They want to protect gun ownership rights, and they believe that there should be maximum punishment for crimes and that people should always be held responsible for their own actions. They also value tradition very highly, like keeping marriage only between a man and a woman and keeping the death penalty. Political attitudes usually run in the family and carry down through generation after generation. Children are influenced greatly by their parents’ political ideologies, so families usually have the same or at least similar political views. Children with parents who have strong or passionate views politically will most likely grow up 5 with the same views. They may go through a rebellious stage in their teenage or young adult years but will most likely always go back to their original political upbringing as a mature adult. Of course, there are exceptions, but for the most part this holds true. Many factors other than family also influence political attitudes, like gender, religion, education level and race/ethnicity. But above all, what runs in the family remains the biggest factor in determining political ideologies other than the individual’s views on certain current topics or debatable issues. “Radical” and “reactionary” are extreme versions of “liberal” and “conservative,” respectively. A radical is extremely far left, or an ultra-liberal or extremist, and a reactionary is extremely far right, or an ultra- 6 conservative or extremist. Reactionaries are so conservative that they want to reverse political progress or change. And radicals favor drastic political, economic or social reforms and often advocate these uncompromisingly. One of the best way to determine your place on the political spectrum and know exactly what political label best describes you and your views is to take a quiz. These are great ways to know what political ideology you most agree with because they are determine your personal views based on issues and how strongly you feel 7 about them. There are no family influences or pressures involved, and no labels on the answers that give away beforehand whether you are choosing a liberal or conservative view; many people feel pressure or obligation to remain true to their political label, instead of expressing their true feelings on certain subjects even if they contradict their label of “liberal” or “conservative.” Once an individual claims him or herself to be a conservative or a liberal, a Republican or a Democrat, they usually automatically go with their group’s decisions or views rather than their own if they happen to differ. If you find many of your views differing from your current group’s views that you have affiliated yourself with, then you may be giving yourself an incorrect political label. Or you may have just misunderstood the 8 true meaning of the political label that you gave yourself, perhaps just based on the fact that your family holds this label and encouraged or pressured you to do the same, and you took it without current education on that political ideology. Every individual has some kind of political attitude, whether it leans toward liberal or conservative, to the extremes or somewhere in the middle. But there’s no right or wrong, because everyone has a right to their own personal political ideology; that’s the beauty of choice and personal freedom. It is also very important to 9 remember that people who have different political ideologies are not bad, or worse – they simply have different opinions. And variety of opinion and individuality are what make America great, right? We all lead such different lives and go down different paths in life. We come from all sorts of different 10 backgrounds and upbringings and aspire to different journeys through life. That is what makes us diverse, interesting and colorful in many different ways. And that in turn is what shapes our country, the United States of America, and ultimately the world around us. After reading, answer the following questions on a separate sheet of paper 1. According to paragraph #1, what are the five categories of the political spectrum? After reading the last sentence of this paragraph, do you agree with the author? 2. According to paragraph #2, what is the general difference between liberals and conservatives? 3. Using paragraphs #3 and #4, complete the following chart on your own paper explaining the beliefs of liberals and conservatives. Liberals Conservatives Immigration Abortion Gay marriage Guns Taxes Military spending Death penalty 4. In paragraph #5 the author states that political beliefs are often passed down through families. Describe 3 ways that your family has influenced your political beliefs. 5. Paragraph #6 the author describes radical and reactionary beliefs. Think of one person who would fall into either the radical or reactionary category and explain how. (Can be someone you know or someone famous). 6. After reading paragraph #8, why do you think it might it be bad to simply adopt your family’s political views? 7. After reading paragraph #9, why do you think it is important to remember that people with different political ideologies than you are not ‘bad’? 8. Draw a political spectrum on your paper, like the one below, and place all 5 political categories on it. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Right‐Wing Populism and Climate Change Denial
    Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 00, No. 0, 2020, pp. 1--21 Right-Wing Populism and Climate Change Denial: The Roles of Exclusionary and Anti-Egalitarian Preferences, Conservative Ideology, and Antiestablishment Attitudes Kirsti M. Jylha¨ * Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden and Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden Kahl Hellmer Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden Populist right-wing politicians and voters tend to dismiss climate change. To in- vestigate possible reasons for this, we tested correlations between climate change denial and variables linked to right-wing populism (Study 1: N = 1,587; Study 2: N = 909). The strongest predictor of climate change denial was an index capturing exclusionary and anti-egalitarian preferences (opposition to, e.g., multicultural- ism and feminism), followed by traditional values (Study 1) and Social Dominance Orientation (Study 2). Populist antiestablishment attitudes correlated only weakly with climate change denial, and this correlation vanished when exclusionary and anti-egalitarian preferences were controlled for. Also, the effects of authoritarian- ism (Study 2) and (low) openness vanished in the full models. Climate change de- nial did not correlate with (low) agreeableness, which is a personality trait linked to populism. However, both antiestablishment attitudes and climate change denial correlated with pseudoscientific beliefs (e.g., anti-vaccination attitudes) (Study 1). To conclude, we did not find support for a notable linkage between climate change ∗Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kirsti M. Jylha,¨ Institute for Futures Studies, SE-101 31, Stockholm, Sweden [e-mail: [email protected]]. Acknowledgements: We are thankful for the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments on the previous draft of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Establishment Coalition Governments in Southern Europe: Greece and Italy
    Anti-establishment coalition governments in Southern Europe: Greece and Italy Vasiliki Georgiadou Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 136 Syngrou Ave. 17671, Athens, Greece. Email: [email protected] Jenny Mavropoulou Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 136 Syngrou Ave. 17671, Athens, Greece. Email: [email protected] Abstract Anti-establishment parties with either a left-wing or a right-wing ideological slant have been entering contemporary European Democracies with sizeable vote shares. During the Great Recession, the Greek and the Italian party system could be perceived as convergent case-studies for the formation and breakthrough of anti-establishment parties. Given the fact that ideologically diverging anti- establishment parties – the Coalition of the Radical Left - Social Unionist Front (SYRIZA) and the Independent Greeks (ANEL) in the Greek case, as well as the Five Star Movement (M5S) and the League in the Italian one – came to power and formed coalition governments, the primary goal of this article is to enquire into supply-side parameters, exploring potential associations along a range of programmatic stances and policy dimensions that effectuated these governing alliances. Using the Comparative Manifesto Project dataset, our findings confirm the existence of expected programmatic differences as well as a converging policymaking basis between the anti-establishment coalition partners of both governing alliances. Keywords: anti-establishment parties, SYRIZA, ANEL, M5S, League, supply-side,
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Spectrum -- a System of Classifying Different Political Positions Upon One Or More Geometric Axes Radical Liberal Moderate Conservative Reactionary
    The Political Spectrum -- a system of classifying different political positions upon one or more geometric axes Radical Liberal Moderate Conservative Reactionary The Traditional One-Dimensional Political Spectrum Radical LIBERAL Moderate Conservative Reactionary Favors _________________progress and _________________;reform Works for reform _________________within existing systems; looks to the _____________future for an improved society Favors government intervention in _________________________the economy (to improve treatment of people and the environment) Wants government to stay out of _______________________social matters (to allow expansion of rights) Radical Liberal Moderate CONSERVATIVE Reactionary Favors society _________________as it is or a _________________return to what society ________________________;once was opposed to abrupt change; Values ____________________tradition Wants government to stay out of _________________________the economy (to conserve freedom of action & maintain limited government) Favors government intervention in _______________________social matters (to conserve traditional values) RADICAL Liberal Moderate Conservative Reactionary Favors _________________dramatic and _________________immediate change; Change comes in the form of a new _________________________society or a ________________________________new political system Radical Liberal Moderate Conservative REACTIONARY Favors _________________dramatic and _________________immediate change; Change comes in the form of a new _________________________restoration
    [Show full text]
  • OD 012 956 AUTHOR TITLE Strategies; Mass Control; *Social Vocational Education Ability to Adapt the Environment to His Appreciat
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 068 595 OD 012 956 AUTHOR Gordon, Edmund W. TITLE Broadening the Concept of CareerEducation. PUB DATE Sep 72 NOTE 15p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Career Education; Communications;*Cultural Factors; Educational Development; EducationalNeeds; *Educational Objectives; EducationalPhilosophy; Educational Planning; EducationalStrategies; Mass Media; Secondary Education; SelfControl; *Social Change; *Technological Advancement;Vocational Education ABSTRACT The advanced technology of moderncommunications has created a condition in which thecontradictions of complex social orders, the atrocities ofinterpersonal, intertribal, and international conflicts, theinequities inherent in practicallyall of our social systems, as well asthe richness of our culturaland technical accomplishments constantlybombard the human spirit with relentless assault and stimulation.Human beings, accustomed to far simpler social environments, havereacted to these inputs with habituation or adaptation. As theseinputs increase in complexity and intensity, the process of habituationis likely to accelerate and the processes of adaptationmust become more complex. Undersuch capacities the survival of man willincreasingly depend on his capacity to use his intellectual powerto adapt to his changing environment as well as on hisability to adapt the environment tohis special needs. Such capacities arelikely to be the product of learning experiences designed tocultivate the mind and spirit of man in ways which combine competencein the use of knowledge, compassionate and empatheticappreciation of values, and masteryof selected skills. It is then thesethree which must comprise the dimensions of career education --education which prepares for continued progress in the life of a person.(Author/3M) FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- OUCEO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarifying the Structure and Nature of Left-Wing Authoritarianism
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology PREPRINT © 2021 American Psychological Association In press. Not the version of record. Final version DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000341 Clarifying the Structure and Nature of Left-wing Authoritarianism Thomas H. Costello, Shauna M. Bowes Sean T. Stevens Emory University New York University Foundation for Individual Rights in Education Irwin D. Waldman, Arber Tasimi Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University Emory University University of Melbourne Authoritarianism has been the subject of scientific inquiry for nearly a century, yet the vast majority of authoritarianism research has focused on right-wing authoritarianism. In the present studies, we inves- tigate the nature, structure, and nomological network of left-wing authoritarianism (LWA), a construct famously known as “the Loch Ness Monster” of political psychology. We iteratively construct a meas- ure and data-driven conceptualization of LWA across six samples (N = 7,258) and conduct quantitative tests of LWA’s relations with over 60 authoritarianism-related variables. We find that LWA, right- wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation reflect a shared constellation of personality traits, cognitive features, beliefs, and motivational values that might be considered the “heart” of au- thoritarianism. Still, relative to right-wing authoritarians, left-wing authoritarians were lower in dog- matism and cognitive rigidity, higher in negative emotionality, and expressed stronger support for a political system with substantial centralized state control. Our results also indicate that LWA power- fully predicts behavioral aggression and is strongly correlated with participation in political violence. We conclude that a movement away from exclusively right-wing conceptualizations of authoritarian- ism may be required to illuminate authoritarianism’s central features, conceptual breadth, and psycho- logical appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and the Challenge of Democratic Commitment
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 1 2003 Article 2 Islam and the Challenge of Democratic Commitment Dr. Khaled Abou El-Fadl∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Islam and the Challenge of Democratic Commitment Dr. Khaled Abou El-Fadl Abstract The author questions whether concurrent and simultaneous moral and normative commit- ments to Islam and to a democratic form of government are reconcilable or mutually exclusive. The author will argue in this Article that it is indeed possible to reconcile Islam with a commitment in favor of democracy. The author will then present a systematic exploration of Islamic theology and law as it relates to a democratic system of government, and in this context, address the various elements within Islamic belief and practice that promote, challenge, or hinder the emergence of an ideological commitment in favor of democracy. In many ways, the basic and fundamental ob- jective of this Article is to investigate whether the Islamic faith is consistent or reconcilable with a democratic faith. As addressed below, both Islam and democracy represent a set of comprehensive and normative moral commitments and beliefs about, among other things, the worth and entitle- ments of human beings. The challenging issue is to understand the ways in which the Islamic and democratic systems of convictions and moral commitments could undermine, negate, or validate and support each other. ISLAM AND THE CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRATIC COMMITMENT Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl* The question I deal with here is whether concurrent and simultaneous moral and normative commitments to Islam and to a democratic form of government are reconcilable or mutually exclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranke the Reactionary
    Syracuse Scholar (1979-1991) Volume 9 Issue 1 Syracuse Scholar 1988 Article 5 1988 Ranke the reactionary Peter Burke Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/suscholar Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Burke, Peter (1988) "Ranke the reactionary," Syracuse Scholar (1979-1991): Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://surface.syr.edu/suscholar/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse Scholar (1979-1991) by an authorized editor of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Burke: Ranke the reactionary RANKE THE REACTIONARY PETER BURKE T IS NOT EASY to give a definition, or even an exact descrip­ tion, ofRanke's contribution to the discipline of history. Many past i definitions characterize his achievement in such a way that they do injustice to important developments in European historical writing in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. For this reason it may be useful to creep up on Ranke from behind, in other words, to see him from the perspective of his predecessors rather than his successors. For example, Ranke is some­ times claimed to be the originator of the important historiographical turn from the narrative "chronicle'' to the documentary "record." On the one side, his famous Zur Kritik neuer Geschichtschreiber is presented as the first serious criticism of narrative sources such as Giovio and Guicciardini. On the other, Ranke is described, as he was by Lord Acton in his inaugural lecture at Cam­ bridge, as "the real originator of the heroic study of records;' and great em­ phasis is placed on his use, for example, of the archives of Venice (for the reports of ambassadors) and Frankfurt (for the proceedings of the Reichstag 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind Left and Right. the Meaning of Left-Right Orientation in Europe
    Behind Left and Right. The meaning of left-right orientation in Europe Wiebke Weber TESI DOCTOR L UPF / NY 2012 DIRECTORS DE L TESI Prof. Willem E. Saris Prof. Mariano Torcal Research and E-pertise Centre for Sur.ey Methodology0 Departament de Ci1ncies Pol2ti3ues i Socials Für meine Eltern Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to all the people who have supported me in completing this dissertation. First and foremost, I owe a great debt of gratitude to my supervisors Willem Saris and ariano Torcal. Willem Saris received me with open arms in his research group, introduced me to the field of survey research, offered me a lot of chances and challenges, and guided me throughout process. ariano Torcal was always there when I needed him and thoroughly inspired and advised me. Your support will never be forgotten. What I will also always remember is the encouragement I received in the beginning at the UPF. Clara Riba welcomed me warmly, and Ignacio Lago fostered my interest in (uantitative research. I met many people who have had an important influence not only on my professional, but also on my personal life. In particular, Lorena Recabarren became a friend and inspiration. No matter how far away she is, whenever I use the terms *left+ and *right+ I gratefully remember our heated discussions. Further conversations I do not want to miss were those with ,aniel Oberski. I admire his capability of explaining and talking over most complex methods. .nother dear friend who has given me great input is .nne van Ewi0k.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is There No Reactionary International Theory? Authors
    This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in International Studies Quarterly following peer review. The version of record Joseph MacKay, Christopher David LaRoche, Why Is There No Reactionary International Theory?, International Studies Quarterly, Volume 62, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages 234–244, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/ sqx083 https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/access_purchase/rights_and_permissions/self_archiving_policy_f (Publisher journal website 15/5/2019) Why Is There No Reactionary International Theory? Authors: Joseph MacKay ([email protected]) Postdoctoral Research Fellow Harriman Institute Columbia University Christopher David LaRoche Doctoral Candidate Political Science University of Toronto Abstract: Why is there no reactionary international theory? International Relations has long drawn on a range of traditions in political thought. However, no current or recent major IR- theoretic school is expressly reactionary. This is surprising both because reaction was once common in IR, and is now common in world politics. We define reaction as a form of political nostalgia: a belief the past was better than the present and likely future, generally accompanied by a desire to recover that prior condition. The current lack of reactionary IR impacts the field’s capacity to make sense both of its own history and of reactionary practice in the world. In this exploratory account, we provide a definition of reaction, then show no current school of IR theory falls within it—but that it nonetheless once deeply shaped the field. We survey reactionary ideas in the history of political thought, finding a cogent and persistent tradition. We then explore the impact of reactionary ideas on the practice of world politics, identifying two distinct varieties of reactionary state and illustrating them empirically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Compass and Why Libertarianism Is Not Right-Wing
    The Political Compass and Why Libertarianism is not Right-Wing J C Lester Abstract The political distinction between left and right remains ideologically muddled. This was not always so, but an immediate return to the pristine usage is impractical. Putting a theory of social liberty to one side, this essay defends the interpretation of left-wing as personal-choice and right-wing as property-choice. This allows an axis that is north/choice (or state-free) and south/control (or state-ruled). This Political Compass clarifies matters without being tendentious or too complicated. It shows that what is called ‘libertarianism’ is north-wing. A quiz gives the reader’s Political Compass reading. Pristine clarity and modern confusion The modern political left/right division is too crude to accommodate many important political positions in a way that makes any sense. Libertarianism (or extreme classical liberalism) is sometimes placed, often implicitly or vaguely, somewhere on the extreme right. But can we say whether it ought to be to the right or left of other „right-wing‟ ideologies? How are we to indicate the extreme tolerance of personal choice (as regards drug use and consenting sexual practices, for instance) that libertarianism entails but which is not normally thought of as being right-wing? Samuel Brittan sees clearly the confusion in the modern left and right (though assuming a libertarian view of liberty): The dilemma of the [classical] liberal is that while Conservatives now use the language of individual freedom, they apply this only—if at all—to domestic economic questions. They are the less libertarian of the two parties—despite individual exceptions—on all matters of personal and social conduct, and are much the more hawk-like in their attitude to „foreign affairs‟.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 2 the POLITICAL SPECTRUM.2
    THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM A2. Developing Transferable Skills: apply in everyday GUIDING QUESTIONS contexts skills developed through investigations related to What has shaped my political orientation? What is the civics and citizenship education, and identify some careers relationship between my beliefs and values and my in which civics and citizenship education might be an asset position on political issues? B1. Factors Affecting Political Engagement: analyse how various factors can contribute to, and present a barrier to, SUMMARY their own and others’ political engagement There are multiple points of view on every political issue and this diversity helps sustain a democracy. B2. Issues of Political Importance: explain the political importance of some current issues and analyse various In this lesson, students use the political inquiry process perspectives associated with these issues and the concepts of political thinking when reflecting on civic issues and ways to address them. In the ‘Minds On’ CPC3O – Specific Expectations activity, students consider different perspectives on the A1.3 assess the credibility of sources relevant to their minimum wage debate. Afterwards, students investigate investigations (e.g., the reliability of the evidence presented their political leanings by answering a political spectrum in a source; the purpose, intended audience, and context of a quiz, reviewing the associated terms and applying their source; the bias, values, and expertise of the speaker/author) understanding. In the ‘Consolidation’ activity,
    [Show full text]