DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus Derbianus Derbianus) Conservation Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Western Derby Eland (Taurotragus Derbianus Derbianus) Conservation Strategy ISBN 978-80-213-2397-1 Western Derby eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) Conservation Strategy Karolína Brandlová David Mallon Pavla Hejcmanová Sebastien Regnaut Pavla Jůnková Vymyslická Tamara Fedorova Magdalena Žáčková Pavel Brandl Souleye Ndiaye Czech University of Life Sciences Prague IUCN Antelope Specialist Group Direction des Parcs Nationaux du Sénégal Derbianus Czech Society for African Wildlife Published by Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic Copyright: © Czech University of Life Sciences Prague 2013 Reproduction of this publication for educational, conservation and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for sale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Recommended citation: Brandlová K., Mallon D., Hejcmanová, P., Regnaut S., Jůnková Vymyslická P., Fedorova T., Žáčková M., Brandl P., Ndiaye S. 2013. Western Derby eland (Taurotragus derbianus derbianus) Conservation Strategy. Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 111 pp. Authors of included photographs: Pavel Brandl, Karolína Brandlová, Kateřina Hozdecká, Tom Jůnek, Pavla Jůnková Vymyslická, Michaela Stejskalová, Magdalena Žáčková Author of included maps: Markéta Antonínová Scientific reviewers: RNDr. Evžen Kůs, RNDr. Petr H. Verner, CSc. Translation and proofreading: Olivier Detrez, Lucie Foltýnová, Petra Hrušovská, Zuzana Kofroňová Printed by Powerprint s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic Edition: 1st Pages: 111 (+ 35 of printed appendices) Number of copies: 200 Not for sale. ISBN 978-80-213-2397-1 CONTENTS List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Preambule ................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 PART A: Status Review of Western Derby eland ...................................................................................... 11 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Species description ............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Taxonomy and phylogeny ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Ecology and social organisation ............................................................................................................................... 15 IUCN Red List status and CITES listing .................................................................................................................. 15 Values ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Geographical distribution ................................................................................................................................................ 17 Current population size and trend ............................................................................................................................... 18 Current WDE population ............................................................................................................................................. 18 Population trend ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 Semi-captive population units .................................................................................................................................. 18 Habitat and resource assessment ................................................................................................................................. 20 Threats and risks ................................................................................................................................................................. 21 Current conservation and management .................................................................................................................... 23 Conservation efforts IN SITU ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Conservation efforts EX SITU .................................................................................................................................... 23 Current conservation strategy .................................................................................................................................. 24 Current management of semi-captive population ............................................................................................ 24 PART B: Western Derby eland Conservation Strategy ........................................................................... 25 Western Derby eland Conservation Workshop ...................................................................................................... 26 Organizers ......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Workshop Venue ............................................................................................................................................................ 26 5 Background ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Purpose of the Workshop ........................................................................................................................................... 26 Structure of the Workshop ......................................................................................................................................... 27 Workshop Agenda ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Programme of Sessions ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Workshop Evaluation – Feedback ............................................................................................................................... 29 Threat Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................. 30 Threats List as Prioritized during the Workshop ............................................................................................. 30 Western Derby eland Conservation Strategy .......................................................................................................... 31 Vision ................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Goal ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Objectives .......................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Actions ................................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Implementation ................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Finalizing the Conservation Strategy ..................................................................................................................... 36 Funding .............................................................................................................................................................................. 36 National Action Plans (NAP) ...................................................................................................................................... 36 PART C: African Studbook of Western Derby eland ............................................................................... 37 Western Derby eland Conservation Programme ................................................................................................... 38 Demography ..................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Genetic analysis .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boselaphus Tragocamelus</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2008 Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) David M. Leslie Jr. U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Leslie, David M. Jr., "Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)" (2008). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 723. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/723 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MAMMALIAN SPECIES 813:1–16 Boselaphus tragocamelus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) DAVID M. LESLIE,JR. United States Geological Survey, Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-3051, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Boselaphus tragocamelus (Pallas, 1766) is a bovid commonly called the nilgai or blue bull and is Asia’s largest antelope. A sexually dimorphic ungulate of large stature and unique coloration, it is the only species in the genus Boselaphus. It is endemic to peninsular India and small parts of Pakistan and Nepal, has been extirpated from Bangladesh, and has been introduced in the United States (Texas), Mexico, South Africa, and Italy. It prefers open grassland and savannas and locally is a significant agricultural pest in India. It is not of special conservation concern and is well represented in zoos and private collections throughout the world. DOI: 10.1644/813.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Common Eland (Taurotragus Oryx) Meat Composition on Its Further Technological Processing
    CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences Department of Animal Science and Food Processing Influence of Common Eland (Taurotragus oryx) Meat Composition on its further Technological Processing DISSERTATION THESIS Prague 2018 Author: Supervisor: Ing. et Ing. Petr Kolbábek prof. MVDr. Daniela Lukešová, CSc. Co-supervisors: Ing. Radim Kotrba, Ph.D. Ing. Ludmila Prokůpková, Ph.D. Declaration I hereby declare that I have done this thesis entitled “Influence of Common Eland (Taurotragus oryx) Meat Composition on its further Technological Processing” independently, all texts in this thesis are original, and all the sources have been quoted and acknowledged by means of complete references and according to Citation rules of the FTA. In Prague 5th October 2018 ………..………………… Acknowledgements I would like to express my deep gratitude to prof. MVDr. Daniela Lukešová CSc., Ing. Radim Kotrba, Ph.D. and Ing. Ludmila Prokůpková, Ph.D., and doc. Ing. Lenka Kouřimská, Ph.D., my research supervisors, for their patient guidance, enthusiastic encouragement and useful critiques of this research work. I am very gratefull to Ing. Petra Maxová and Ing. Eva Kůtová for their valuable help during the research. I am also gratefull to Mr. Petr Beluš, who works as a keeper of elands in Lány, Mrs. Blanka Dvořáková, technician in the laboratory of meat science. My deep acknowledgement belongs to Ing. Radek Stibor and Mr. Josef Hora, skilled butchers from the slaughterhouse in Prague – Uhříněves and to JUDr. Pavel Jirkovský, expert marksman, who shot the animals. I am very gratefull to the experts from the Natura Food Additives, joint-stock company and from the Alimpex-maso, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Taxonomy and Iversity of Crown Ruminants Above the Species
    Zitteliana B 32 (2014) 5 Current taxonomy and diversity of crown ruminants above the species level Colin Groves School of Archaeology & Anthropology, Australian National University Zitteliana B 32, 5 – 14 Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia München, 31.12.2014 E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received 17.01.2014; revision accepted 20.10.2014 ISSN 1612 - 4138 Abstract Linnaeus gave us the idea of systematics, with each taxon of lower rank nested inside one of higher rank; Darwin showed that these taxa are the result of evolution; Hennig demonstrated that, if they are to mean anything, all taxa must represent monophyla. He also pro- posed that, to bring objectivity into the system, each taxonomic rank should be characterised by a particular time depth, but this is not easy to bring about: genera such as Drosophila and Eucalyptus have a time-depth comparable to whole orders among mammals! Within restricted groups of organisms, however, time-depths do tend to vary within limits: we will not do too much violence to current usage if we insist that a modern mammal (including ruminant) genus must have a time-depth of about 5 million years, i.e. going back at least to the Miocene-Pliocene boundary, and a modern family must have a time-depth of about 25 million years, i.e. going back to the Oligocene- Miocene boundary. Molecular studies show that living ruminants present examples where the „traditional“ classification (in the main laid down in the mid- 20th-century, and all too often still accepted as standard even today) violates Hennigian principles.
    [Show full text]
  • For Review Only 440 IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group
    Manuscripts submitted to Journal of Mammalogy A Pliocene hybridisation event reconciles incongruent mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees among spiral-horned antelopes Journal:For Journal Review of Mammalogy Only Manuscript ID Draft Manuscript Type: Feature Article Date Submitted by the Author: n/a Complete List of Authors: Rakotoarivelo, Andrinajoro; University of Venda, Department of Zoology O'Donoghue, Paul; Specialist Wildlife Services, Specialist Wildlife Services Bruford, Michael; Cardiff University, Cardiff School of Biosciences Moodley, Yoshan; University of Venda, Department of Zoology adaptive radiation, interspecific hybridisation, paleoclimate, Sub-Saharan Keywords: Africa, Tragelaphus https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jmamm Page 1 of 34 Manuscripts submitted to Journal of Mammalogy 1 Yoshan Moodley, Department of Zoology, University of Venda, 2 [email protected] 3 Interspecific hybridization in Tragelaphus 4 A Pliocene hybridisation event reconciles incongruent mitochondrial and nuclear gene 5 trees among spiral-horned antelopes 6 ANDRINAJORO R. RAKATOARIVELO, PAUL O’DONOGHUE, MICHAEL W. BRUFORD, AND * 7 YOSHAN MOODLEY 8 Department of Zoology, University of Venda, University Road, Thohoyandou 0950, Republic 9 of South Africa (ARR, ForYM) Review Only 10 Specialist Wildlife Services, 102 Bowen Court, St Asaph, LL17 0JE, United Kingdom (PO) 11 Cardiff School of Biosciences, Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff University, Museum 12 Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, United Kingdom (MWB) 13 Natiora Ahy Madagasikara, Lot IIU57K Bis, Ampahibe, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 14 (ARR) 15 16 1 https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jmamm Manuscripts submitted to Journal of Mammalogy Page 2 of 34 17 ABSTRACT 18 The spiral-horned antelopes (Genus Tragelaphus) are among the most phenotypically diverse 19 of all large mammals, and evolved in Africa during an adaptive radiation that began in the late 20 Miocene, around 6 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMEROON Savanna & Forest
    Serving Sportsmen Since 1952 CAMEROON Savanna & Forest Hunting safaris in Cameroon are conducted in both the Savannah region which is generally in the North of the country and the Forest in the Southern regions. The areas are safe and easily accessible. Cameroon is an incredible country for big game hunting and we arrange safaris in the best hunting areas of the country. Safari Outfitters has represented this superb hunting outfitter Corporate Headquarters longer then any of our other African outfitters with 143 South Bent Street, Suite D the exception of one. So you will see that we know Powell, WY 82435 them very well and are 100% confident in their 307-587-5596 areas, success, PH’s and camps. www.safari1.com cf Breaking Records... it’s what we do! Savannah Forest Without a doubt, the magnificent Lord Derby or Arguably the most strikingly beautiful antelope in Giant Eland is one the top trophies in all of Africa all of Africa, the Bongo is high on the list of those and the largest of the antelope group. This guy can who yearn to hunt wild places. Local Pygmies trot all day and jump a 6 foot fence from a standing trackers and their small dogs are used to hunt start. In addition to Lord Derby Eland, game such Bongo in the dense rainforest and they do an as Western Roan, West African Savannah Buffalo, amazing job. The dogs are used to hold the animal Korrigum, Central Kob, Sing-sing Waterbuck and in place while the hunter takes the shot. Without others may hunted in the Niwa and Vina hunting dogs, the Bongo would just keep running and areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Eland
    Tragelaphus oryx – Common Eland recognised, though their validity has been in dispute (Thouless 2013): Tragelaphus o. livingstonii (Sclater 1864; Livingstone's Eland): also called kaufmanni, niediecki, selousi and triangularis. It is found in the Central Zambezian Miombo woodlands i.e. south- central Africa (Angola, Zambia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zimbabwe, Mozambique and Malawi). Livingstone's Eland has a brown pelt with up to twelve stripes. Tragelaphus o. oryx (Pallas 1766; Cape Eland): also called alces, barbatus, canna and oreas. This subspecies is found south of the Zambezi river (South Africa, Botswana and Namibia). The fur is tawny, and adults lose their stripes. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Tragelaphus o. pattersonianus (Lydekker 1906; East National Red List status (2004) Least Concern African Eland or Patterson's Eland): also called Reasons for change No change billingae. It is found in east Africa extending into the Somali arid areas, hence its common name. Its coat Global Red List status (2008) Least concern can have up to 12 stripes. TOPS listing (NEMBA) None Tragelaphus o. oryx occurs throughout the larger part of South Africa, but the far northern Limpopo Province CITES listing None bordering Zimbabwe is regarded as a transitional zone Endemic No between T. o. oryx and T. o. livingstonii or an area where they overlap. This argues the case that they should rather During drought conditions Eland roam extensively be described as ecotypes (in ecotypes, it is common for in order to meet forage and water requirements; in continuous, gradual geographic variation to impose the southern Kalahari during abnormally dry analogous phenotypic and/or genetic variation; this conditions, Eland were found to cover more than situation is called cline.).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15 the Mammals of Angola
    Chapter 15 The Mammals of Angola Pedro Beja, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Luís Veríssimo, Elena Bersacola, Ezequiel Fabiano, Jorge M. Palmeirim, Ara Monadjem, Pedro Monterroso, Magdalena S. Svensson, and Peter John Taylor Abstract Scientific investigations on the mammals of Angola started over 150 years ago, but information remains scarce and scattered, with only one recent published account. Here we provide a synthesis of the mammals of Angola based on a thorough survey of primary and grey literature, as well as recent unpublished records. We present a short history of mammal research, and provide brief information on each species known to occur in the country. Particular attention is given to endemic and near endemic species. We also provide a zoogeographic outline and information on the conservation of Angolan mammals. We found confirmed records for 291 native species, most of which from the orders Rodentia (85), Chiroptera (73), Carnivora (39), and Cetartiodactyla (33). There is a large number of endemic and near endemic species, most of which are rodents or bats. The large diversity of species is favoured by the wide P. Beja (*) CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal CEABN-InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] P. Vaz Pinto Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] L. Veríssimo Fundação Kissama, Luanda, Angola e-mail: [email protected] E.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioural Phylogeny of Bovidae
    Zitteliana B 32 (2014) 175 Behavioural phylogeny of Bovidae Pierre Deleporte1* & Henri Cap2 Zitteliana B 32, 175 – 184 1Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, UMR6552 EthoS, Station Biologique, 35380 Paimpont, France. München, 31.12.2014 2Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France. Manuscript received *Author for correspondence and reprint requests; E-mail: [email protected] 30.04.2014; revision accepted 02.10.2014 ISSN 1612 - 4138 Abstract In this article, we examine the possible contribution of behavioural studies to the determination of phylogenetic relationships within the Bovidae. First, we revisit the general arguments concerning the use of behavioural traits as phylogenetic characters; then we present our first attempt at reconstructing the phylogeny of Bovidae based on behavioural data taken from the literature. Despite the limited number of characters used, several clades of low hierarchical levels are supported by this phylogenetic analysis, in much the same manner as by morphological and molecular ones. Several characters linked to male sexual behaviour appear to be among the more informative ones. Key words: Phylogeny, behaviour, Bovidae, methods. 1. Introduction tions; however, basing phylogenetic inference upon behavioural traits is not universally accepted. Early Methods for phylogenetic inference are under- ethologists had no such reluctance. The founders of going tremendous changes with the advent of mo- behavioural sciences were keen to demonstrate that lecular approaches. This does not mean that the behavioural characters, much like morphological more traditional morphological and behavioural ones, could provide relevant taxonomic evidence. approaches should now be completely neglected. Even if genuine and explicit phylogenetic methods Both have proved successful in unraveling some well were not immediately implemented, a taxonomic supported phylogenetic relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Causes of Mortalities in Wild Ungulates of Tanzania
    RISKS AND CAUSES OF MORTALITIES IN WILD UNGULATES OF TANZANIA 1Mbassa GK, 2Pereka AE, 3Matovelo JA, 4Mgasa MN, 5Kaita M, 1Mwangalimi MO Departments of Veterinary 1Anatomy, 2Physiology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, 3Pathology, 4Surgery and Theriogenology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3016 Morogoro, 5Department of Wildlife, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, P. O Box 636 Morogoro Tanzania ABSTRACT Habitat and forensic studies in Mkomazi, Saadani and Selous game reserves and Longido, Gonabis and Doma-Mkata protected areas of Tanzania indicate fires, poachers, hunters, predators, lack of feed and water due to habitat deterioration, agriculture and livestock to pose high risk to survival of plains zebra, buffalo, blue wildebeest, eland, hartebeest, impala, Thomson’s and Grant’s gazelles. Wildebeests and buffaloes suffer high mortality rates followed by hartebeests, elands, zebras and giraffes, the causes being trauma due to wire snares, bullets and predators. Animals acquire intelligence and develop survival strategies including knowledge of being a target species, man and predator preferences, home range for safety, borders of reserve areas, protectors, tools held by man and maintain minimum distances from strangers, perform sudden, fast irregular movements and vertical jumps to avoid being targeted, females separate from males while running and animals migration from high risk areas to safe places. Measurement of risks and causes of deaths is prerequisite to prediction of population trends and developing effective wildlife conservation strategies and as shown by this study ethology, habitant examination, forensic diagnosis on dead animal remains and migrations are useful information sources. INTRODUCTION Wild ungulates are of great economic importance in East Africa and their utilisation for food and export is increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed-Species Exhibits with Pigs (Suidae)
    Mixed-species exhibits with Pigs (Suidae) Written by KRISZTIÁN SVÁBIK Team Leader, Toni’s Zoo, Rothenburg, Luzern, Switzerland Email: [email protected] 9th May 2021 Cover photo © Krisztián Svábik Mixed-species exhibits with Pigs (Suidae) 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 Use of space and enclosure furnishings ................................................................... 3 Feeding ..................................................................................................................... 3 Breeding ................................................................................................................... 4 Choice of species and individuals ............................................................................ 4 List of mixed-species exhibits involving Suids ........................................................ 5 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – SUIDAE .......................................................... 6 Sulawesi Babirusa, Babyrousa celebensis ...............................................................7 Common Warthog, Phacochoerus africanus ......................................................... 8 Giant Forest Hog, Hylochoerus meinertzhageni ..................................................10 Bushpig, Potamochoerus larvatus ........................................................................ 11 Red River Hog, Potamochoerus porcus ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FOI Summary, Thianil (Thiafentanil Oxalate), MIF 900-000
    Date of Index Listing: June 16, 2016 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION SUMMARY ORIGINAL REQUEST FOR ADDITION TO THE INDEX OF LEGALLY MARKETED UNAPPROVED NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR MINOR SPECIES MIF 900-000 THIANIL (thiafentanil oxalate) Captive non-food-producing minor species hoof stock “For immobilization of captive minor species hoof stock excluding any member of a food- producing minor species such as deer, elk, or bison and any minor species animal that may become eligible for consumption by humans or food-producing animals.” Requested by: Wildlife Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Freedom of Information Summary MIF 900-000 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION: ............................................................................. 1 II. EFFECTIVENESS AND TARGET ANIMAL SAFETY: .............................................. 1 A. Findings of the Qualified Expert Panel: ...................................................... 2 B. Literature Considered by the Qualified Expert Panel: ................................... 4 III. USER SAFETY: ............................................................................................. 6 IV. AGENCY CONCLUSIONS: .............................................................................. 7 A. Determination of Eligibility for Indexing: .................................................... 7 B. Qualified Expert Panel: ............................................................................ 7 C. Marketing Status: ................................................................................... 7 D. Exclusivity:
    [Show full text]