DOCSLIB.ORG

A G R O S T a T I S T I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A G R O S T a T I S T I REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Census of Agricultural Holdings in Bulgaria in 2010 Ministry of Agriculture and Food Ministry of Agriculture and With the financial support of Food the European Union No 217 – November 2012 2010 2020020052005 Agricultural Census in 2010 RAZGRAD DISTRICT – main results General Characteristics of the district A The Razgrad District is situated in the North Central Region and is one of the 28 districts in Bulgaria (level G NUTS 3 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics of EU). The total area of the district is 2 637 sq. km which is 2.4% of the territory of the R country. The number of settlements is 103, administered in 7 municipalities; the towns are 6 and the villages – 97. According to the population census in O 2011 the population in the district is 125 190, which is 14.5% of the population of the region and 1.7% of the population in the country. The total utilized agricultural area (UAA) is 1 435 783 dca or 54.4% of the territory of the district. S STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS The number of agricultural holdings in the Razgrad District is 9 301, representing 21.5% of the holdings in the district and T 2.5% of the holdings in the country. The utilized agricultural area (UAA) is 1 435 783.0 dca allocated in 9 014 holdings. The average value of the UAA for the district is 159.3 dca or 57% above the average for the country – 101.3 dca. The number of the holdings without UAA is 287. The Isperih Municipality has the largest number of agricultural holdings with A UAA – 2 123, followed by Kubrat Municipality – 2 016, and Razgrad Municipality – 1 167. The average size of the land on the holdings is the highest in Razgrad Municipality – 307.7 dca, and the smallest with 117.5 dca in Samuil Municipality. The holdings that work more than 500 dca of UUA are 277 (3%) and cover 85% (1 227 547 dca) of UAA in T the district. The agricultural holdings cultivating up to 10 dca are 4 904 or 54% of the holdings with UAA in the district, but they cultivate only 1% (17 671 dca) of the UAA. I Table 1 Distribution of agricultural holdings in the Razgrad District according to the size of the UAA by S municipalities UAA (dca) Total ≥ 100.0 and < = 0.0 > 0.0 and < 10.0 ≥ 10.0 and < 20.0 ≥ 20.0 and < 100.0 ≥ 500.0 500.0 Municipality Number Average Number Number Number Number Number T UAA Number of UAA UAA UAA UAA UAA of size of of of of of (dca) holdings (dca) (dca) (dca) (dca) (dca) holdings (dca) holdings holdings holdings holdings holdings I BULGARIA 370 222 36 169 647.3 101.3 13 148 248 015 816 280.7 46 944 625 506.8 41 124 1 631 422.8 12 828 2 786 112.8 8 163 30 310 324.2 Razgrad Municipality 9 301 1 435 783.0 159.3 287 4 904 17 670.7 1 494 20 147.3 1 896 76 515.8 443 93 902.1 277 1 227 547.1 Zavet 1 134 162 039.8 145.3 19 458 1 754.0 274 3 679.1 285 10 738.2 61 12 184.7 37 133 683.8 C Isperih 2 206 297 527.3 140.1 83 750 3 365.4 463 6 425.2 726 30 370.8 137 28 914.8 47 228 451.1 Kubrat 2 113 272 791.1 135.3 97 1 181 4 795.4 351 4 634.5 349 13 670.1 76 16 925.0 59 232 766.1 S Loznitsa 1 389 173 292.2 126.5 19 942 3 999.1 159 2 073.9 198 7 524.2 36 7 570.8 35 152 124.2 Razgrad 1 202 359 132.2 307.7 35 822 1 850.4 73 1 016.3 123 5 319.1 83 17 900.2 66 333 046.2 Samuil 752 84 720.3 117.5 31 327 973.7 153 2 032.4 184 7 369.6 37 7 177.4 20 67 167.2 Tsar Kaloyan 505 86 280.1 171.9 3 424 932.7 21 285.9 31 1 523.8 13 3 229.2 13 80 308.5 Results and analyses Distribution of UAA in the Razgrad District UAA according to the legal status of the holdings The utilized agricultural area of 1 435 783 is allocated into 9 014 Figure 1 agricultural holdings located on the territory of the Razgrad Associations District. The number of the owners who are natural persons is and others Natural 8 767 and they manage 23% of the total UAA with an average Commercial persons area of 38.1 dca. The commercial companies are 96 and they 6% companies 23% manage 37% of the total UAA. The average area of their holdings is 5 578.5 dca. The agricultural cooperatives in the district are 37, 37% with 20% of UAA. 14% of UAA are managed by 93 sole traders. The average area of their holdings is 2 185.2 dca. The remaining Sole traders 6% of the UAA are cultivated by civil associations and other 14% structures (monasteries, schools, institutes, etc.). 22% of the utilised land is owned by the holdings, 78% is leased. 86% of the utilized land is owned by natural persons. Cooperatives 20% CROPS Distribution of UAA by crops The arable land in the district is 1 339 129 dca or 93% of the UAA Figure 2 of the district and it is allocated in 7 430 agricultural holdings. Cereals represent 58% of UAA, industrial crops – 31%, fodder Fruit Others plants – 3%, permanent grassland – 6%, and permanent crops – species Wheat 18% 1% of UAA. 1% 37% Wheat occupies 37% of the UAA and 63% of cereals, grain maize Grassland – 11% of the UAA and 19% of the cereals. Lentils occupy 49% of 6% the dry pulses area in the district. Sunflower is 64% of the area of industrial crops and 20% of the UAA, and rape – 25% of Rape industrial crops and 8% of the UAA. 13% of the pumpkin seeds in 8% the country are grown by 1 180 holdings in the district. Tobacco occupies 7 586 dca (3% of the area in the country) allocated in Sunflower Grain 939 agricultural holdings. 20 % maize 11% LIVESTOCK Livestock, poultry and bees are bred by 7 975 holdings in the Allocation of livestock units district. Of them 38% breed cattle, 49% – sheep, 29% – goats, 8% Figure 3 – pigs and 78% – poultry. 18 640 heads of cattle are bred in the 3% Razgrad District, the average size of the herds being 6.2 heads. BULGARIA 41% 12% 16% 20% 8% Dairy cows are 10 977. Cattle, sheep, goats and pigs are bred mainly in holdings of natural persons – 76% of the cattle, 93% of Razgrad 33% 7% 24% 27% 7% the sheep and 99% of the goats, respectively. 92% of the pigs and 2% 81.4% of the poultry are bred on the holdings of commercial Cattle Sheep Goats Pigs Poultry Other companies and sole traders. 23 608 bee colonies are bred on 669 holdings, 90% of them in the holdings of natural persons. Livestock units are standard measuring units which allow for unification of the different categories of animals for the purpose of their comparison. LABOUR FORCE Number of persons employed in agriculture by gender and age group 20 101 (seasonal workers excl.) worked in the agricultural holdings in 2010. The volume of their work input was 11 180 annual work units Figure 4 (AWU). 17 069 or 85% of those employed in in the agriculture in the district were family labour force. 3 032 or 15% of the employed were non-family labour (employees) and they worked a total of over 65 years 2 251 1 448 2 916 AWU. The seasonal workers worked 101.8 thousand man- days, which represents 439 AWU. 40% of the employees were from 55 to 64 years 2 963 2 107 women, 60% - men. The pensioners above 64 years of age working in agricultural holdings were 18% of the employed, and from 45 to 54 years 2 860 2 042 the workers up to 34 years of age were 12%. Of 9 301 holding from 35 to 44 years 2 575 1 515 managers (natural persons incl.) 81% were men and 19% were women. The managers worked a total of 4 866 AWU. from 25 to 34 years. 1 159 723 8% of them were aged up to 34 while 25% of them were over 64 years of age. under 24 years 312 146 Male Female TYPOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS In the Razgrad District predominate the holdings specialized in breeding of grazing animals, with mixed crops and livestock breeding and those specialized in arable crops –27.2%, 22.6% and 20.9% respectively. ¾ of the standard output is formed by the holdings specialized in growing arable crops (48.9%) and in breeding pigs and poultry (25.8%). 2 MAIN RESULTS Table 2 Numbers of holdings and area with main crops, number of livestock and labour force in Razgrad District BULGARIA Razgrad District Agricultural Areas and Crops Holdings Area Holdings Area (number) (dca) (number) (dca) Utilised Agricultural Area 357 074 36 169 647.3 9 014 1 435 783.0 Arable land 250 728 31 249 279.8 7 430 1 339 129.1 Cereals 119 640 17 961 479.9 5 520 838 430.4 - Wheat 49 436 11 497 374.0 2 979 530 704.1 - Barley 19 759 2 523 437.0 1 602 143 441.6 - Grain maize 68 381 3 151 539.5 3 779 155 637.2 Sunflower 16 873 7 325 024.3 1 034 286 575.3 Rape 1 927 2 231 852.8 96 113 592.6 Seed pumpkins 5 858 174 258.4 1 180 22 825.7 Fodder crops 75 332 1 061 335.4 4 251 49 859.9 Kitchen gardens 227 930 103 646.5 7 006 4 181.3 Permanent grassland 107 267 3 820 229.9 210 79 699.0 Permanent crops 118 610 996 491.1 1 709 12 773.6 - Vineyards 87 002 523 356.7 1 183 1 793.5 - Fruit species 42 827 455 048.5 645 10 844.6 Apples 19 138 58 509.8 97 488.2 Plums and wild plums 16 273 83 745.8 310 2 989.2 Cherries and sour cherries 10 702 106 319.8 65 3 604.7 Walnuts 2 938 62 212.2 82 1 583.5 BULGARIA Razgrad District Types and categories of livestock Holdings Number of Holdings Number of animals* (number) animals* (number) Cattle 95 357 576 339 2 992 18 640 - Cows 86 210 347 291 2 649 11 106 Sheep 91 793 1 415 181 3 893 34 926 Goats 84 582 388 866 2 271 9 109 Pigs 82 265 670 469 644 с - Sows 15 235 73 547 265 4 482 Total equidae 92 806 112 632 3 486 3 713 Poultry 185 455 17 491 187 6 142 1 286 591 - Hens for laying eggs and growing up hens 180 253 7 875 278 5 982 231 347 - Chickens for fattening 19 457 7 564 578 570 984 221 * Excluding bees, which are given as number of bee colonies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Results Achieved
    SPECIAL ISSUE Campaign of Roma organizations created preconditions for directing Structural funds resources for Roma integration in Bulgaria AMALIPE CENTER FOR INTERETHNIC DIALOGUE AND TOLERANCE Veliko Turnovo 5000, 2/204 Hristo Botev Str., p.o.box.113 Tel/Fax: (062) 600 – 224, 00359 888 681 134, [email protected] The Campaign TABLE OF CONTENTS In May 2006 Center Amalipe and Open Society The Campaign 1 Institute, Sofia, started an advocacy campaign for Strengths (Results achieved) 1 including major issues related with Roma Weaknesses 3 integration in the strategic documents regulating Opportunities 4 the EU Structural funds absorptio n in Bulgaria. In Threats 4 the following months 46 Roma NGOs and a Major participants 4 number of Roma experts joined the campaign. Supporters 5 Overcoming serious difficulties the campaign Stages of the campaign 5 achieved almost all its goals and brought to establishing the majority of the necessary Steps ahead 7 preconditions for dir ections resources from the The cooperation needed 8 Structural funds to Roma integration activities in Appendices 9 Bulgaria. The success of the campaign and its importance for the development of the civil society as in a special letter by Thomas Bender, head of in Bulgaria in general has been acknowledged by unit “ESF, Monitoring of Corresponding National the Bulgarian Minister of Financ e Plamen Policies I, Coordination Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Oresharski during the ceremony for signing the Ne therlands, Employment, Social Affairs and Equal National Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Civil Sector Report
    ALTERNATIVE CIVIL SECTOR REPORT TO THE SECOND REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA PURSUANT TO ART. 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (FCNM) Inter-Ethnic Initiative for Human Rights Foundation Sofia, Bulgaria September 2009 This report was produced with the financial support of the Trust for Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe Information, opinions and expert assessments on particular issues in this Alternative Civil Sector Report were contributed by the following representatives of non-governmental organisations and individual experts (in alphabetical order): • Deyan Kolev, Amalipe Centre for Inter-Ethnic Dialogue and Tolerance, Veliko Tarnovo • Emilia Mateina, Inter-Ethnic Initiative for Human Rights Foundation • Kalina Bozeva, Inter-Ethnic Initiative for Human Rights Foundation • Ramadan Kehayov, human rights activist, Madan, Southern Bulgaria • Fetie Sharanska, Evroalternativi 21 Association, Yakoruda The information was compiled and the conclusions and recommendations drafted by the team of the Inter-Ethnic Initiative Human Rights Foundation This report was translated from Bulgarian into English by Mark Bossanyi ([email protected]) І. Inter Ethnic Initiative for Human Rights (IEI) Foundation The IEI foundation is a non-profit, non-governmental organisation registered in Bulgaria in July 1996. It strives to promote the rights of minorities and inter-community co-operation in practice in all areas of public life. Іts operational aims are: • To influence official policies in accordance with international human/minority rights protection standards. • Тo inform and sensitise politicians, state and municipal employees about these standards. • To encourage citizen control on the implementation of international minority rights standards. • To enhance public sensitivity and understanding about the problems and rights of minorities, encouraging a spirit of inter- ethnic tolerance, mutual support and non-discriminative practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project « Network of Cities Which Use CLLD Principles And
    The project « Network of cities which use CLLD principles and cultural activities to promote inclusion of the Roma in Europe » was funded with the support of the European Union under the Programme "Europe for Citizens" Applicable to the Strand 2 – Measure 2.2 "Networks of Towns" Measure 2.3 "Civil Society Projects" Strand 1 – "European Rememberance" 5 events have been carried out within this project: Event 1 First international event: meeting in Resita Participation: The event involved 232 professionals/citizens, including 26 participants from the city of Gyongyos, Hungary; 20 participants from the city of Torino, Italy; 32 participants from the city of Isperih, Bulgaria and 154 participants from the city of Resita, Romania Location / Dates: The event took place in Resita, Romania, from 12/10/2017 to 14/10/2017 Short description: The aim of the event was to promote social inclusion and it involved local, regional and national or European officials and/or elected representatives To the events took part the Mayor of Resita, Mr. Popa Ioan, one local councillor from Isperih Bulgaria, one local councillor from Torino Italy and the councillor of the Mayor for Roma Problems from Hungary. Also to the meeting took part the National Coordinator of the Romact team from Council of Europe and one representative from the European Commission, MS Maria Canelas who come in a monitoring visit for this project. The 3 days meeting included the following activities: a. Conference: • Participation: The event involved 128 professionals/citizens, including 26 participants from the city of Gyongyos, Hungary; 20 participants from the city of Torino, Italy; 32 participants from the city of Isperih, Bulgaria and 60 participants from the city of Resita, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • PHARE Grant Tables with Beneficiaries
    Phare 2004 Grants table list Name Page Grants awarded under Call for Proposals BG2004/016-711.11.04/ESC/G/CGS published on 24 February 2006 25 Grants awarded under Call for Proposals BG2004/016-711.11.04/ESC/G/GSC-1 published on 07 July 2006 654 Схема за безвъзмездна помощ за стимулиране на публично-частното партньорство 854 GRANT CONTRACTS AWARDED DURING April - November 30th, 2006 905 Grants awarded without a Call for Proposals - BG 2004/016-919.05.01.01 - Support for participation of the 920 Republic of Bulgaria in Community Initiative Interreg III B (CADSES) and Interreg III C Programme Grants awarded under Call for Proposals: BG2004/016-715.02.01: Joint Small Projects Fund between 952 Republic of Bulgaria and Republic of Turkey, published on April 3rd 2006 Grants awarded under Call for Proposals: BG 2004/016-782.01.02/GS: People to People in Actions in Support for Economic Development and Promotion of Employment between Republic of Bulgaria and Republic of 967 Greece, published on March 30th 2006 Grants awarded under Call for Proposals: BG2004/016-782.01.03-03/Grants: Promotion of Nature Protection Actions and Sustainable Development across the border, Republic of Bulgaria and Republic of Greece, 991 published on July 10th 2006 Grants awarded under Call for Proposals: BG2004/016-782.01.06.03/Grants: Promotion of the Cultural, Tourist and Human resources in the Cross-Border region, Republic of Bulgaria and Republic of Greece, published on 1007 July 10th 2006 Grants awarded under Call for Proposals: BG2004/016-783.01.03.01*Grants: Joint Small Project Funds , 1037 Republic of Bulgaria and Republic of Romania, published on July 10th 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage and Museums
    MUZEUL DUNÃRII DE JOS, CÃLÃRAÞI MM U U S S E E U U M M S S , , , XXVII MONUMENTSMONUMENTS ÃREA DE JOS ÃREA LA DUN LA AND TOURISM AND TOURISM ÞIE A Z CIVILI ÞI Cãlãraºi, str. Progresului, 4 Ã secretariat: +40 242 313 161 etnografie: +40 242 311 690 fax: +40 242 311 974 e-mail: [email protected] CULTUR w w w . m d j c a l a r a s i . r o CULTURÃ ÞI CIVILIZAÞIE LA DUNÃREA DE JOS * XXVII * CULTURE AND CIVILISATION AT THE LOWER DANUBE www.cimec.ro CULTURĂ ŞI CIVILIZAŢIE LA DUNĂREA DE JOS XXVII MUZEE, MONUMENTE ŞI TURISM LA DUNĂREA DE JOS *** CULTURE AND CIVILISATION AT LOWER DANUBE XXVII MUSEUMS, MONUMENTS AND TOURISM AT LOWER DANUBE www.cimec.ro Editors: Dr. Marian Neagu, Lower Danube Museum, Călăraşi Responsible redactor Valentin Parnic, Lower Danube Museum, Călăraşi Scientific Secretary Dragomira Boeva Member: Aris Tsaravopoulos, Călăraşi County Council Editura DAIM • www.daimph.ro ISBN 978-973-1787-02-2 www.cimec.ro MUZEUL DUNĂRII DE JOS CULTURĂ ŞI CIVILIZAŢIE LA DUNĂREA DE JOS XXVII MUZEE, MONUMENTE ŞI TURISM LA DUNĂREA DE JOS * * * CULTURE AND CIVILISATION AT LOWER DANUBE XXVI MUSEUMS, MONUMENTS AND TOURISM AT LOWER DANUBE CĂLĂRAŞI, 2009 www.cimec.ro www.cimec.ro SUMMARY Virgil Nitulescu Museums of today: A role to play in the tourism industry ......................................... 7 Daniel Ştefan Cross border tourism at Lower Danube - Brief presentation .................................. 15 Aris Tsaravopoulos Can an archaeological site contribute to the sustainable development of a remote island? .................................................................................................. 21 Nikolay Nenov European Heritage Buildings Tourist Itinerary Guidebook ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Historical Information
    http://www.rz.government.bg/en/106-cultural-and-historical-information Page 1 Cultural and historical information In District Razgrad there are registered about 1,200 monuments, together with thousands of artefacts and documents which illustrate the rich material and spiritual culture of tribes and peoples who lived in Ludogorie Area over millennia. First rudiments date from the early period of the Old Stone Age (500,000 to 200,000 years BC) and were found near Razgrad. Among the most famous monuments is the national historical- archeological reserve "Sboryanovo" in Isperih municipality. It has an area of 6,470 acres and a security zone 13,304 acres. Within the reserve is one of the nine monuments in Bulgaria under UNESCO protection: the Thracian tomb near Sveshtari village defined for monument of cultural heritage in 1985. In 2012 in the reserve was uncovered unique gold Thracian treasure from the late 4th century BC in the tomb called "Omurtag's tomb" defined as royal necropolis of the capital of the Thracian tribe gaiters. The Historical and archaeological reserve "Abritus", Razgrad, with an area of 1,000 acres is a cultural monument of national importance. Abritus is fortification system of the ancient city, which has been studied and partially restored, exposed and accessible for tourists. Near Abritus in battle with the Goths was killed Trajan Decius - the only one killed outside of Rome Roman Emperor. The project under the Operative Programme "Regional Development" will contribute for major restoration and socialization of the reserve with animations, restoration of the historic events and the construction of a visitor center.
    [Show full text]
  • Register for Broiler Farms
    REGISTER FOR BROILER FARMS Register with relevance to 22.04.2013 № AREA MUNICIPALITY VILLAGE HOLDING OWNER CAPACITY 1. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Belyakovets 5031-0234 Oleg Mihaylov 5 000 2. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Belyakovets 5031-0235 “BUTCH-51”Ltd 10 000 3. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Belyakovets 5031-0232 Alexander Vasilev 7 000 4. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Mindya 5044-0150 ST “PROLET-90-G.ARABADJIEV" 36 000 5. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Prisovo 5033-0151 “VALTER-RP 59”SPLTD 22 100 6. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Prisovo 5033-0165 “VALTER-RP 59”SPLTD 10 900 7. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Pushevo 5062-0120 ST “PROLET-90-G.ARABADJIEV" 36 000 8. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Resen 5060-0633 "AGROKOMERS-VIB"SPLTD 29 500 9. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Tserova koriya 5047-0150 ST “PROLET-90-G.ARABADJIEV" 23 000 10. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Tserova koriya 5047-0151 ST “PROLET-90-G.ARABADJIEV" 19 000 11. Veliko Tarnovo Veliko Tarnovo Shemshevo 5027-0096 Angel Dimitrov-GRANIT ST 54 000 12. Veliko Tarnovo Gorna Oryahovitsa Gorna Oryahovitsa 5100-0206 "KOLAROV-63"SPLTD Toshko Kolarov 33 000 13. Veliko Tarnovo Gorna Oryahovitsa Dolna Oryahovitsa 5130-0431 ST "JINT-JIVKA PAVLEVA" 50 000 14. Veliko Tarnovo Gorna Oryahovitsa Parvomaytsi 5139-0392 Stoyan Markov 15 000 15. Veliko Tarnovo Gorna Oryahovitsa Parvomaytsi 5139-0391 Dimitar Kirilov Grigorov 10 000 16. Veliko Tarnovo Gorna Oryahovitsa Varbitsa 5128-0166 „PLANETA 98„SPLTD 100 000 17. Veliko Tarnovo Pavlikeni Byala Cherkva 5220-0436 "VALKO-VR"LTD 11 200 18. Veliko Tarnovo ММ-MIROSLAV HRISTOV ST – holding is Pavlikeni Dolna Lipnitsa 5226-0100 closed 39 000 19.
    [Show full text]
  • EØS-ORGANER EØS-Komiteen
    EØS-tillegget ISSN 1022-9310 Nr. 5 til Den europeiske 19. årgang utgave 26.1.2012 unions tidende I EØS-ORGANER 1. EØS-komiteen NORSK 2012/EØS/5/01 Kommisjonsvedtak av 17. april 2007 om lister over dyr og produkter som skal kontrolleres på grensekontrollstasjonene i samsvar med rådsdirektiv 91/496/EØF og 97/78/EF (2007/275/EF) ............................................................................................................ 1 2012/EØS/5/02 Kommisjonsvedtak av 19. april 2007 om endring av vedtak 2001/881/EF og 2002/459/EF med omsyn til lista over grensekontrollstasjonar (2007/276/EF) ...................... 26 2012/EØS/5/03 Kommisjonsvedtak av 10. mai 2007 om endring av vedlegg I og II til vedtak 2002/308/EF om utarbeiding av lister over godkjende soner og godkjende oppdrettsanlegg med omsyn til hemoragisk virusseptikemi (VHS) eller infeksiøs hematopoietisk nekrose (IHN) eller begge desse fiskesjukdommane (2007/345/EF) ............ 51 2012/EØS/5/04 Kommisjonsdirektiv 2007/10/EF av 21. februar 2007 om endring av vedlegg II til rådsdirektiv 92/119/EØF med hensyn til tiltak som skal treffes innenfor en vernesone etter et utbrudd av smittsomt blæreutslett hos gris .................................................................. 78 2012/EØS/5/05 Kommisjonsbeslutning av 28. februar 2007 om opprettelse av en EF-veterinærberedskapsgruppe som skal bistå Kommisjonen med å gi medlems- stater og tredjestater støtte i veterinære spørsmål med hensyn til visse dyresykdommer(2007/142/EF) ................................................................................................ 80 2012/EØS/5/06 Kommisjonsvedtak av 28. februar 2007 om endring av vedtak 2005/393/EF med hensyn til unntaket for utførselsforbudet for handel innenfor Fellesskapet og med hensyn til å endre avgrensningen av restriksjonssonene i Bulgaria, Frankrike, Tyskland og Italia (2007/146/EF) ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Page 1
    http://www.rz.government.bg/en/105-infrastructure Page 1 Infrastructure Transport infrastructure Razgrad District is a major international and national transport junction connecting Central Europe with the Black Sea and Asia. In the region crosses the international road E-70 Ruse-Varna , matching the river (the Danube) and sea (Black Sea) ports of the Bulgarian territory and II-class state roads II- 49 Tutrakan-Kubrat-Razgrad-Targovishte and II-23 Ruse-Kubrat-Zavet-Isperih. Through the territory of District Razgrad passes railway Ruse - Varna, which is 5 km away from Razgrad town, in close proximity to one of the industrial areas of the city. The line serves not only national but also international flows and is the second component of the regional transport corridor Ruse - Varna . The total length of railway line in the field is 92 km. In the period 2007 – 2011, were rehabilitated and reconstructed sections of the second and third class roads with projects under the Operational Programmes of The EU. Two sections of municipal roads are with increased class. As a result, the length of class roads increased by 5 km in the period - from 283 km, it is 288 km. As a result of activities carried out, by 2011 about one-third of the population of Razgrad with improved transport access to settlements. Main priorities for the District Razgrad for the next programming period - 2014 - 2020 is the construction of high-speed four-lane road from Ruse to highway "Hemus" / project is included in the EU Strategy for the Danube Region 2014 - 2020 years / and building "Hemus" highway that will be near Razgrad District.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Development Report Bulgaria 1996
    HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT BULGARIA 1996 Published for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Sofia, Bulgaria 1996 Front cover: Krassimir Bonev Human Settlement Back cover: Vihroni Popnedelev Flora Ïúðâà êîðèöà: Êðàñèìèð Áîíåâ Íàñåëåíî ìÿñòî ×åòâúðòà êîðèöà: Âèõðîíè Ïîïíåäåëåâ Ôëîðà ISBN 954-90175-2-4 Copyright © 1996 United Nations Development Programme, Sofia © Editing, composition of the text: National & Global Development, Sofia © Graphic design, layout & print: ARGED, Sofia © Cover design: Bozhidar Ikonomov, Sofia 2 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT ! BULGARIA 1996 FOREWORD For almost fifty years, Bulgarian society has been the candid and professional analysis of an eminent team guided by principles which hardly changed over time. Then, working under the guidance of Prof. Nikolai Genov. all of the sudden, the introduction of democratic institu- tions and market economy shattered the foundations of The process of preparing the report is just as impor- socio-economic life of the country. The radical changes tant as the report itself. The preliminary findings have been caused disorientation among large segments of the popu- presented and discussed at several workshops open to the lation which was not prepared for them. public. The team of authors greatly benefited from the open exchange of ideas there. The magnitude of the changes was not anticipated in the international community as well. As a result, the ob- The findings of the report indicate that the main chal- jective of creating an environment which provides equal lenge to Bulgarian society is the development of the hu- opportunities for all is far from being met. New disparities man capacity to cope with a rapidly evolving social trans- appeared, old ones increased.
    [Show full text]