DOCSLIB.ORG

The Survey of Pir Hüseyin, 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Survey of Pir Hüseyin, 2004 Anatolica 36, 165-195. doi: 10.2143/ANA.36.0.2049242 © 2010 by Anatolica. All rights reserved. ANATOLICA XXXVI, 2010 THE SURVEY OF PøR HÜSEYøN, 2004 Brian L. Peasnall and Guillermo Algaze* INTRODUCTION Since 2002, the DiyarbakÕr Small Streams Archaeological Survey Project has worked to record archaeological sites in the piedmont region of the Upper Tigris Drainage Area just east of the city of DiyarbakÕr, north of the Tigris River, and west of the city of Batman and the Batman River (Peasnall 2003) (Fig. 1). The project is ongoing, and to date 108 sites have been recorded within the survey area. Unquestionably, one of the most important of these is the ancient settlement of Pir Hüseyin, situated some 25 km east of DiyarbakÕr on a high terrace overlooking the floodplain of the Ambar Çay, a minor perennial tributary of the Tigris. Pir Hüseyin has long been a focus of scholarly attention as the putative location where a justly famous stele of the Akkadian king Naram Sin was unearthed sometime in the last decade of the 19th century (below). Surprisingly, however, the mound had never been systematically surveyed, mapped, and collected until members of the DiyarbakÕr Small Streams Archaeological Survey Project did so in 2004.1 What follows is a report on that work focusing on the setting of the site, its nature, chronology, and significance. RESEARCH BACKGROUND In 1892, Natik Effendi, a lawyer from DiyarbakÕr whose work often took him to villages in the vicinity of that city, visited the house of a local landowner and noticed a broken stone stele that had been incorporated into the retaining wall of a well. After he brought the monument to the attention of local museum authorities in DiyarbakÕr, the stele was quickly sent to the archaeological museum in Istanbul (ES 1027; Amiet 1975: 197, Fig. 105; Börker-Klähn 1982: 133, Fig. 25), where it remains today (Fig. 2). Made of polished diorite, and measuring, as preserved, 57 x 42 x 20 cm, the stele bears the figure of a helmeted Mesopotamian king holding weapons. This royal personage is depicted in a style typical for art of the mature Akkadian period in southern Mesopotamia (Orthmann 1975), and is, in fact, identified in the accompanying inscription as Naram Sin, the powerful fourth ruler of the Akkadian Dynasty in southern Mesopotamia, whose reign is * Peasnall: University of Delaware; Algaze: University of California, San Diego. 1 The 2004 season consisted of Brian Peasnall (director), Guillermo Algaze (archaeologist), Michael Rosenberg (archaeologist), Mitchell Rothman (archaeologist) and øsmail SarÕpÕnar, who served as representative of the Directorate of Museums and Monuments of the Ministry of Culture in Ankara. The members of the project were ably assisted in all aspects of their work by ùehmus Kartal, director of the Culture and Tourism Ministry’s office in Batman Province. 993428_Anatolica-36_06_Peasnall.indd3428_Anatolica-36_06_Peasnall.indd 116565 007-05-20107-05-2010 114:50:204:50:20 166 BRIAN L. PEASNALL & GUILLERMO ALGAZE conventionally dated to ca. 2260-2223 BC. This identification is very important because we know from extant textual documentation (year names, contemporary royal inscriptions, later copies of such inscriptions, and later epics) that the early kings of the Akkadian Dynasty in southern Mesopotamia campaigned extensively against enemies situated across the high plains straddling the borders of modern day Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. Naram Sin, in particular, crossed the Tigris river repeatedly in order to campaign in areas east of the river in northern Iraq, the area then known as “Subartu”, and north of the Tigris in southeastern Turkey, the area then known as the “Upper Lands” (Frayne 1993; Steinkeller 1998; Westenholz 1999). Additionally, we know that Naram Sin was the first Akkadian king to have brought portions of Upper Mesopotamia under the direct control of Akkadian imperial administrators (Frayne 1993; Risvet and Weiss 2005; Westenholz 1999). Soon after it arrived in Istanbul, the stele was examined and published by the Assyriologist Jean-Vincent Scheil (1893). Following publication, the stele was immediately, and correctly, understood as a record of the nature and extent of the activities of the Akkadian Empire in the Upper Tigris region. Naturally, this stimulated a search for its precise find spot. To this effect, the German explorer J.P. Naab (1934) traveled to DiyarbakÕr in 1902 where he located both Natik Effendi and the owner of the house in which the lawyer had first noticed the stele. There, Naab was told that the stele had been originally found at the small village of Pir Hüseyin on the Ambar Çay. When Naab arrived at Pir Hüseyin, he observed that the modern village was situated just south of an impressive ancient mound. In short order he was able to locate a villager who claimed to have been present when the stele was first discovered in 1890 as villagers dug into nearby ancient ruins to collect stones for use as foundations for their houses. According to the informant, the stele was found just east of the village that existed at the time of Naab’s visit, about 2 “cubits” (Ottoman arsin: ca. 1.3-1.5 meters) below the modern surface (Naab 1934: 33).2 Based on this, Naab (1934: Pl. III, Fig. 5) provides a rough map for its find spot, redrawn here as Fig. 3, which places the stele directly southeast of the ancient mound of Pir Hüseyin as he understood it. Naab’s findings were confirmed two years later by the British scholar, Leonard King (1910: 245, note 1), who also traced the stele backwards from DiyarbakÕr to Pir Hüseyin and was also taken by local villagers to the exact location of the site where the stele was unearthed. Unlike Naab, King does not 3 provide a map, but his description matches Naab’s point by point. 2 The arsin, an Ottoman unit of length, varied slightly depending on its use context. When used by architects, it was equivalent to ca. 75 cm; when used as a general unit of measurement in the marketplace, it was equivalent to ca. 68 cm; and when used specifically as a measurement for textiles it was equivalent to ca. 65 cm (Hinz 1970). 3 The Naab/King attribution of the Naram Sin stele to Pir Hüseyin is generally accepted by ancient Near Eastern scholars. One notable exception, however, is Jutta Börker-Klähn (1982: 133), who contends that the stele came instead from the village of Mayafarkin (modern Silvan, Byzantine Martyropolis, some 45 km northeast of Pir Hüseyin). Regretfully, Börker-Klähn does not discuss the reasons for this alternate attribution of the stele’s provenance. A recent definitive compilation of Akkadian Royal Inscriptions by Douglas Frayne (1993: 128) repeats the contrasting claims about the stele’s provenance without taking sides. However, an attribution of the stele to the Silvan area is, in our opinion, untenable in light of Naab and King’s careful detective work. We suspect that Börker-Klähn’s attribution of the stele's provenance to a location other than Pir Hüseyin is ultimately based on an underestimation of the true extent of the settlement in the Late EBA (below). 993428_Anatolica-36_06_Peasnall.indd3428_Anatolica-36_06_Peasnall.indd 116666 007-05-20107-05-2010 114:50:204:50:20 ANATOLICA XXXVI, 2010 167 Our work at the site indicates that the mound of Pir Hüseyin as Naab, King, and other early explorers understood it, represents only the citadel of a much larger ancient settlement, which was founded and grew to its maximum extent in the late third millennium BC, and that the stele, if in its original location, would have been situated towards the southeastern periphery of the lower town that surrounded the citadel at that time (Fig. 4). Further, our collections suggest that Pir Hüseyin continued to represent an important regional center through at least the first millennium BC, and was the locus of substantial occupations dating to the Middle Bronze, Late Bronze (Middle Assyrian), and Iron (Neo-Assyrian) Ages. However, before discussing the results that substantiate these preliminary conclusions, we need turn to a brief discussion of the regional and environmental context in which the site existed. REGIONAL SETTING AND COMMUNICATIONS The piedmont region of the Upper Tigris Drainage where Pir Hüseyin is located is a coherent region of high plains and low rolling hills north of the Tigris River and south of the Taurus mountains of southeastern Turkey (Fig. 1). Like the river, the piedmont runs in a northwest to southeast direction through southeastern Turkey, with the Taurus coming closer to the river towards the eastern edge of the piedmont. Within the survey area, the piedmont ranges in altitude from ca. 650 to 850 m in a west-east direction. It is characterized by relatively abundant and stable annual precipitation, which ranges from ca. 500 to 600 mm per year and naturally follows an increasing west (DiyarbakÕr: see Erinç 1950) to east (Silvan: see Bayraktar, Turalioglu, and Sen 2005) gradient that varies with the noted altitudinal changes. Today, the piedmont is intensively devoted to grain production. However, its natural vegetation would have consisted of an open forest of scattered oak and pistachio (Rosenberg et al. 1998), and remnants of this vegetation can still be observed in isolated spots too difficult to plow. Pir Hüseyin sits atop a Pleistocene terrace overlooking the Ambar Çay, which flows about 340 m east of the site (Fig. 5). The precise location of the site within this terrace was probably determined by a line of substantial springs offering potable water to its inhabitants, which emerges some 130-170 m southwest of the High Mound within a seasonal creek that runs perpendicular (i.e., E-W) to the Ambar Çay.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (DROB Ware) from the Upper Khabur
    DOI: 10.51493/egearkeoloji.857928 ADerg 2021/1, Nisan / April; XXVI:91-106 Araştırma/Research Archaeometric Analysis of Early Bronze Age Dark Rimmed Orange Bowl Ware (DROB ware) from the Upper Khabur (NE-Syria) and the Upper Tigris Valley (SE-Anatolia) [YUKARI HABUR VE YUKARI DICLE HAVZASINDA BULUNAN ERKEN TUNÇ CAĞI “DARK RIMMED ORANGE BOWL WARE “(DROB WARE) SERAMIKLERIN ARKEOMETRIK ANALIZLERI] Mustafa KIBAROĞLU Anahtar Kelimeler Erken Tunç Çağı Seramikleri, Yukarı Dicle Havzası, Yukarı Habur Ha vzası, Arkeometrik Analiz, Seramik köken analizi. Keywords Early Bronze Age Pottery, Dark Rimmed Orange Bowl Ware, Upper Tigris Valley, Upper Khabur Valley, Archaeometric Analysis, Provenance Study. ÖZET Bu çalışmanın amacı, Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’ndeki Yukarı Dicle Havzasında ve Kuzey Suriye’deki Yukarı Habur Havzasında yapılan arkeolojik araştırmalarda ele geçen Erken Tunç dönemine ait Dark Rimmed Orange Bowl Ware (DROB-ware) mal grubunun, kimyasal ve petrografik analiz yöntemlerini kullanarak üretim yerinin belirlenmesidir. Bu amaçla, her iki bölgeden alınan DROB ware örneklerinin yanında, söz konusu seramiklerin üretiminde kullanılan muhtemel kil kaynak alanlarını tespit edebilmek için, her iki bölgeden çeşitli kil yataklarından örneklerde alınarak kimyasal ve petrografik analizleri yapılmıştır. Arkeometrik analiz sonuçları, DROB ware’in Yukarı Dicle Havzasında, Bismil ve Batman arasında bu- lunan kil kaynaklarından üretildiğini, Yukarı Habur Havzasındaki höyüklerde bulunan örneklerin, bu bölgeye Yukarı Dicle Havzasından geldiğini göstermektedir. ABSTRACT The Early Bronze Age Dark Rimmed Orange Bowl Ware (DROB ware) uncovered at various archaeo- logical sites in the Upper Khabur (NE-Syria) and the Upper Tigris Valley (SE-Anatolia) were examined using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and petrographic thin section methods to determine chemical and mineralogical characteristics of the ware, with a view to determining the production place of the ware.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacleto D'agostino the Upper Khabur and the Upper
    Anacleto D’Agostino The Upper Khabur and the Upper Tigris Valleys during the Late Bronze Age: Settlements and Ceramic Horizons 0. Introduction Field research undertaken in recent decades in northern Syria and southeastern Turkey has significantly improved our understanding of the material culture and settlement patterns in the area, offering new evidence that merits discussion. Although the new stratigraphic sequences brought to light in the recent excavations have enhanced the archaeological profile of some sites, a comprehensive picture of the com- position and development of the settlements and ceramic assemblages during the second half of the sec- ond millennium BC is still lacking, mainly due to the very limited number, and the limited size, of settle- ments excavated to date. One of the key issues in the debate on the second millennium BC in northern Mesopotamia concerns the nature and development of the settlement pattern at the time of the Middle Assyrian conquest and the changes that occurred under the Mittani and Assyrian hegemonies in the upper Khabur and upper Tigris valleys. This paper offers a general overview of Late Bronze Age settlements in the valleys of the upper Kha- bur and Tigris Rivers, and takes into account the results from both early and more recent excavations as well as small and large regional surveys, aiming to highlight some interesting advances in our knowl- edge of the area whilst also drawing attention to the many questions that remain unanswered in our at- tempts to reconstruct the cultural sequence and historical events of these territories.1 1. The geographical and historical contexts The upper Tigris and upper Khabur valleys comprise two distinct geographical and ecological zones within the upper Mesopotamia/Southeastern Anatolian region, straddling the high terrain of the Tur Abdin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zangid Bridge of Ǧazīrat Ibn ʿumar
    Bulletin d’études orientales LXII | 2014 Année 2013 The Zangid bridge of Ǧazīrat ibn ʿUmar (ʿAyn Dīwār/Cizre): a New Look at the carved panel of an armoured horseman Le pont zengide de Ǧazīrat Ibn ʿUmar (ʿAyn Diwār/Cizre) : nouveau regard sur le bas-relief représentant un cavalier en armure الجسر فيالزنكيابنجزيرةعمر ( عينديوار : ( نظرة جديدةعلىالنقش الحجري الناتئالذييمثلفارسا ً يرتديدرعا ً David Nicolle Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/beo/1404 DOI : 10.4000/beo.1404 ISSN : 2077-4079 Éditeur Presses de l'Institut français du Proche-Orient Édition imprimée Date de publication : 30 avril 2014 Pagination : 223-264 ISBN : 978-2-35159-403-2 ISSN : 0253-1623 Référence électronique David Nicolle, « The Zangid bridge of Ǧazīrat ibn ʿUmar (ʿAyn Dīwār/Cizre): a New Look at the carved panel of an armoured horseman », Bulletin d’études orientales [En ligne], LXII | 2014, mis en ligne le 04 juin 2014, consulté le 10 décembre 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/beo/1404 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/beo.1404 © Institut français du Proche-Orient The Zangid bridge of Ǧazīrat ibn ʿUmar (ʿAyn Dīwār/Cizre): A New Look at the carved panel of an armoured horseman David NICOLLE Nottingham University Previous Studies Many scholars and historians have made reference to the remarkable if largely ruined bridge which either spanned, or was intended to span, the river Tigris a few kilometers downstream from what is now the Turkish frontier town of Cizre (figures 1-5). However, they were obliged to rely upon the work of Conrad Preusser who studied this ruined bridge, as well as other historical structures in the area, early in the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • HIRBEMERDON TEPE DURING the IRON AGE PERIOD: a Case Study in the Upper Tigris River Region*
    Anatolica 36, 17-65. doi: 10.2143/ANA.36.0.2049238 © 2010 by Anatolica. All rights reserved. ANATOLICA XXXVI, 2010 HIRBEMERDON TEPE DURING THE IRON AGE PERIOD: * A case study in the Upper Tigris river region Guido Guarducci & Nicola Laneri** The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the material culture uncovered from the Iron Age levels (ca. 1050-610 BC) at the site of Hirbemerdon Tepe, located along the upper Tigris river in southeastern Turkey. The first part of the paper includes a brief introductory chapter dedicated to the site location and its geographical and environmental context, with a second chapter on the Neo-Assyrian historical sources on the area here considered. The second half of the paper instead comprises a detailed analysis of the architecture and pottery found in Hirbemerdon Tepe’s Iron Age levels with a specific focus on the most represented and best preserved phase, the Early Iron Age period (i.e., Phase IVA, ca. 1050-900 BC). Moreover, a catalogue describing the studied pottery fragments is attached at the end of the article as an Appendix. The final section of the paper places the ceramic assemblage in a broader historical context to better define the role played by the site of Hirbemerdon Tepe during the Iron Age, with a specific emphasis on the transformation that occurred in the socioeconomic landscape of the upper Tigris river due to the arrival of the Neo-Assyrians in the area during the ninth century BC. 1. THE GEOGRAPHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT The archaeological site of Hirbemerdon Tepe is situated in southeastern Turkey in the DiyarbakÕr province, 40 km east of the modern town of Bismil (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1.3 the Neo-Assyrian Empire
    Exploring the Rural Landscape of the Neo-Assyrian Empire: Settlement Increase in the Iron Age Near East Parthiban Yahambaram UCL Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastern Archaeology July 2018 I, Parthiban Yahambaram, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would never have been written without the guidance, teaching and support given to me by my supervisor, Dr. Rachael Sparks. I would also like to thank my beloved wife Sophie for her love and support, and especially for being patient with me. 2 ABSTRACT The Neo-Assyrian Empire was a complex political entity that controlled most of the Near East from the 9th to the 7th centuries BCE. This empire has been described in recent scholarship as having made a unique imprint on the regional landscape. This thesis is a re-examination of the archaeological evidence that explores the changes in settlement patterns that have been noted in surveys carried out in various parts of the Near East. It also examines excavation evidence from a number of sites in former Assyrian provinces in order to obtain a clearer picture of the rural landscape of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, and to consider whether the Pax Assyriaca hypothesis provides a valid interpretative framework for the survey and excavation evidence. The thesis will reconsider the survey data from the Tigris-Euphrates Archaeological Reconnaissance Project, which was used to support the ‘agricultural colonisation’ hypothesis proposed by Bradley Parker, and compare this with evidence obtained from other surveys conducted in Syro-Mesopotamia and the southern Levant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Proclaimed Islamic State and the War for Water and Power
    Running head: WATER AS A WEAPON IN SYRIA AND IRAQ University of Nevada, Reno Water as a Weapon in Syria and Iraq: The self-proclaimed Islamic State and the War for Water and Power A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and the Honors Program by Jillian M. Ebrahimi Dr. Nicholas Seltzer, Thesis Advisor May, 2016 WATER AS A WEAPON IN SYRIA AND IRAQ iv UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA THE HONORS PROGRAM RENO We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by JILLIAN M. EBRAHIMI entitled Water as a Weapon in Syria and Iraq: The self-proclaimed Islamic State and the War for Water be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS, POLITICAL SCIENCE ______________________________________________ Nicholas Seltzer, Ph.D., Thesis Advisor ______________________________________________ Tamara Valentine, Ph. D., Director, Honors Program May, 2016 WATER AS A WEAPON IN SYRIA AND IRAQ i Abstract The self-proclaimed Islamic State is targeting water supplies throughout Syria and Iraq. This manipulation of water resources combined with seasonally hot and dry years, increasing populations and urbanization, and decrease in water quality, water security is soon to become a rare resource in the Tigris and Euphrates River Basin. For countries like Syria and Iraq, which rely almost exclusively on water from these rivers, the impact of the manipulation of these rivers by the self-proclaimed Islamic State is already leading to massive water shortages, starvation, disease, and displacement. The self-proclaimed Islamic State is diverting water, flooding communities, contaminating water sources, threatening destruction of dams, and controlling water only to sell it back to the governments and populations in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tour of Turkish Mesopotamia
    A Tour of Turkish Mesopotamia David Pierce August , Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul http://mat.msgsu.edu.tr/~dpierce A Tour of Turkish Mesopotamia This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–Noncommercial–Share-Alike License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ CC BY: David Pierce $\ C Mathematics Department Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Istanbul, Turkey http://mat.msgsu.edu.tr/~dpierce/ [email protected] As explained in the text, this document concerns a trip made in the fall of , when I was living in Ankara and working at Middle East Technical University. I created this report later in . Now, almost five years later, I have made cosmetic changes, such as switching from A to A paper. I have found little reason to change much of the text itself. Contents Mathematics and history Holidays Departure Destination Harput Diyarbakır Malabadi Bridge Hasankeyf Yazidism Mor Gabriel Eating, drinking, and smoking Deyrulzafaran Mardin Harran Urfa Euphrates Mount Nemrut Septimius Severus Antep History and mathematics Mathematics and history Ayşe and I toured southeastern Turkey between Saturday, September , and Saturday, October , . Since then, from the books that we have at home, I have tried to learn more of the history of the places that we saw. This article is a result of my researches and thoughts. In school, I had an uneasy relationship with history. Many people have an uneasy relationship with mathematics, and one reason for this may be that there is no arguing with mathematics. If you’re wrong, you’re wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Anatolian Stone Arch Bridges and a Case Study for Malabadi Bridge
    Characteristics of Anatolian stone arch bridges and a case study for Malabadi Bridge A. Doğangün and A. Ural Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey ABSTRACT: Many civilizations settled in Anatolia which is one of the oldest settlements of the world due to the geographical conditions and they constructed some marvellous historical struc- tures. This study investigated the geometrical and structural characteristics of historical stone arch bridges in Anatolia. For this aim at first, constructed arch bridges are surveyed considering their lengths, heights, arch spans and number of arches etc. The Malabadi Bridge, one of the most famous historical heritage bridges, is selected as a case study. Finite Element Method is used for the modelling. Support settlements are considered in the analyses. The prototype mod- elled with continuum elements at macro-level and an analysis performed including nonlinear material behaviour is discussed. 1 INTRODUCTION A lot of construction materials were used for the historical structures like stone, brick, adobe or timber etc. Unfortunately many of the historical structures constructed with these materials ex- cept for the stone, have not lasted to the present time. Stone is one of the most durable materi- als. Therefore this material has been commonly used in historical structures. But it is not easy to construct every form using this material. Nevertheless stone was to play a part in the prestige of ancient nations, as in case of pyramids in Egypt. In later periods, large pre-hispanic monuments in Mexico, the great monumental walls of China, Roman, Byzantium walls, temples, and pal- aces, fortresses are among other examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier Land and Rural Settlement in the Upper Tigris River Valley (South-Eastern Turkey) from Roman to Byzantine Age (Second-Sixth Centuries AD)
    Frontier land and rural settlement in the upper Tigris river valley (south-eastern Turkey) from Roman to Byzantine age (second-sixth centuries AD) RODOLFO BRANCATO Department of Humanistic Studies, Catania University Abstract Southeastern Anatolia was one of the regions in which the Roman and Eastern empires fought for centuries for supremacy. In the fourth century CE, the Roman/Sasanian border shifted from the Euphrates River to the Tigris River: the upper Tigris River valley was thus embedded in the Eastern Roman frontier between the Roman and Sasanian empires. Changes in settlement patterns during the Late Antique period seem to confirm the limit of Roman control to the area West of the Batman River, one of the tributaries of the Tigris River in its upper course. The integration of new and legacy archaeological data available for this borderland may help in better understanding of local rural landscape and enable an analysis of the relationship between imperialism and the organization of borderlands. Keywords Upper Tigris River valley, Landscape archaeology, Frontier studies, Legacy data, Settlement patterns West & East 271 Monografie, 3 rodolfo brancato 1. Introduction digitised and geo-referenced, but must be pre- pared, and often manipulated, before they can be This article focuses on the Roman landscape of used in a digital environment».4 Their use for new the upper Tigris River valley, the area located in landscape archaeological research has been widely Southeastern Turkey between the modern town of considered in Mediterranean archaeology5 in the Bismil and the Cizre-Silopi plain: in the first half last few decades and recently in Near Eastern as of the first millennium the region was a contested well.6 When evaluating the current state of evi- frontier zone between the Roman and eastern dence for the upper Tigris River valley, clear diffi- (Arsacids then Sasanian) empires.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of Turkey
    Sl. No Name Flowing into Comments 1 Afrin River Mediterranean Sea 2 Aksu Mediterranean Sea (Classical Kestros) 3 Aksu Deresi Black Sea (Anatolia) Giresun Province 4 Ankara River Black Sea (Anatolia) 5 Aras River Caspian Sea Is a tributary of the Aras. It arises in Armenia and forms part of the border 6 Arpaçay River (also known as Akhurian) Caspian Sea between Armenia and Turkey before joining the Aras. 7 Asi River Mediterranean Sea (Classical Orontes) 8 Bakırçay Aegean Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Caicus or Astraeus) 9 Balikh River Persian Gulf 10 Bartın River Black Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Parthenius) 11 Batlama River Black Sea (Anatolia) Giresun 12 Batman River Persian Gulf 13 Biga Çayı, Marmara Sea the classical Granicus 14 Botan River Persian Gulf (Uluçay) 15 Büyük Menderes River Aegean Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Maeander or Meander). 548 km 16 Cadmus (river) Aegean Sea (Anatolia) 17 Cayster River Aegean Sea (Anatolia) or Küçük Menderes. 114 km 18 Çekerek River Black Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Scylax) is a tributary 19 Ceyhan River Mediterranean Sea (Classical Pyramus or Leucosyrus). 509 km 20 Çoruh River Black Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Acampsis) 21 Deli Çay River Mediterranean Sea 22 Delice River Black Sea (Anatolia) tributary 23 Devrez River Black Sea (Anatolia) tributary 24 Dim River Mediterranean Sea 25 Ergene Aegean Sea (Europe) is a tributary inside of Turkey. 26 Euphrates Persian Gulf 27 Filyos River Black Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Billaeus) 28 Gediz River Aegean Sea (Anatolia) (Classical Hermus). 401 km 29 Gelevara Deresi Black
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Exploitation in the Upper Tigris River Valley (Turkey) Between the 3Rd and the 1St Millennia BC
    Animal exploitation in the Upper Tigris River valley (Turkey) between the 3rd and the 1st millennia BC Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch‐Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Rémi Jean‐Paul Berthon Kiel, 2011 Referent: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Müller Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Cheryl Makarewicz Korreferent : Dr. Marjan Mashkour Date of the oral examination: 10.10.2011 Date of the printed manuscript: 12.12.2011 Dean Kiel, 13.07.2011, Hiermit erkläre ich, Rémi Berthon, geboren am 10.12.1982 in Annemasse (Frankreich), dass diese Abhandlung nach Inhalt und Form meine eigene Arbeit ist. Beiträge von anderen als meiner Person wurden deutlich als solche hervorgehoben. Diese Arbeit wurde weder im Ganzen noch in Teilen einer anderen Stelle im Rahmen eines Prüfungsverfahrens zur Begutachtung vorgelegt, veröffentlicht oder zur Veröffentlichung eingereicht. Die Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft wurden bei der Entstehung dieser Arbeit eingehalten. Rémi Berthon Acknowledgements Three years ago I was imagining the dissertation as a single‐handed yacht race. I realize now that I would have never been able to complete it whitout the support of many people. It is my pleasure to thank them all here. I am very thankful to my supervisor Prof. Dr. U Müller who supported my studies in Kiel. I have been able to reach this stage of research thanks to Dr. M. Mashkour who provides me with advices, comments, criticisms and stong support since I looked at my first animal bone. I also want to thank Dr. E. Vila, Prof. Dr. C. Makarewicz, Prof. Dr. R. Duttmann, PD Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Long Term Natural Streamflows Trend of the Upper Tigris River
    Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Vol-2, Issue-8, 2016 ISSN: 2454-1362, http://www.onlinejournal.in Comparison Of The Long Term Natural Streamflows Trend Of The Upper Tigris River Dogan YILDIZ1, Dursun YILDIZ2 & Mehmet Samil GUNES3 1Department of Statistics, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa, 34220, Istanbul, Turkey 2Director of Hydro politics Association, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey 3Researcher in Applied Research Center of Hydro politics Association, Kavaklidere, Ankara, Turkey Abstract: The Tigres River is a transboundary river and stability in the region. Therefore changes in the that plays very important role on security, peace hydro-climate is also of importance for the region. and stability in the Middle East. This paper presents trends computed for the forty-year period Sadik and Barghouti [1] emphasized that the extent of yearly streamflows obtained from Upper Tigris of the problem is so severe that “the future Basin in Turkey. Because of the review of major challenges in meeting the growing demands for trend studies for this region and the fact of water are beyond the capabilities of individual streamflow being a privileged variable, a countries”. Mitigating supply shortfalls could be streamflow trend analysis study in the Euphrates achieved by re-allocation of current agricultural and Tigris River seemed to be an important supplies [2]. Future predictions suggest more necessity. shortages [3,4,5] and depletion of groundwater resources [6]. Present situation is very complex in Simple linear regression model is adopted in this Syria and Iraq. Future prospects are not better study. This paper mainly focuses on naturally where showed that Iraq, Syria and Turkey will be changing trend in long term Tigris streamflows.
    [Show full text]