Environmental Considerations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Considerations Nigg Slipway Repairs: Environmental Considerations Cromarty Community Development Trust Date: 14/01/2020 Document Control Name Title Signature Date Author Jack Clarkson Consultant J Clarkson 20/12/2019 Reviewer Fiona Henderson Director F Henderson 03/01/2020 Authoriser Fiona Henderson Director F Henderson 03/01/2020 Effective Date: 14/01/2020 Revision No: Signature Comments Date 2 [Redacted] Formatting Update 14/01/2020 No Content Change Contents 1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Need ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Description of Works ............................................................................................................................ 2 Construction Methodology ................................................................................................................ 3 Concrete Blockwork Construction .......................................................................................... 3 Sheet Piling Construction .......................................................................................................... 3 3 Statutory Context ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Marine Licence ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Onshore Consenting ............................................................................................................................. 4 Marine Works Licence .......................................................................................................................... 4 Habitats Regulation Appraisal .......................................................................................................... 4 National Marine Plan ............................................................................................................................ 4 4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Baseline Assessments ........................................................................................................................... 3 Assessment Criteria ............................................................................................................................... 3 Receptor Sensitivity ..................................................................................................................... 3 Impact Severity and Magnitude .............................................................................................. 4 Determination of Significant Effects ...................................................................................... 5 5 Environmental Implications and Assessment ...................................................................................... 6 In-Air Noise .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Policy and Guidance .................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 7 Baseline............................................................................................................................................. 8 Assessment ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Mitigation ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Policy and Guidance ................................................................................................................. 10 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 12 Baseline.......................................................................................................................................... 14 Impact Assessment ................................................................................................................... 16 Mitigation ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Coastal Processes................................................................................................................................ 19 Policy and Guidance ................................................................................................................. 19 Baseline.......................................................................................................................................... 19 Assessment .................................................................................................................................. 19 Mitigation ..................................................................................................................................... 20 Water Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Policy and Guidance ................................................................................................................. 20 Baseline.......................................................................................................................................... 20 Impact Assessment ................................................................................................................... 20 Mitigation ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Local Community and the Economy............................................................................................ 22 Policy and Guidance ................................................................................................................. 22 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 22 Baseline.......................................................................................................................................... 23 Impact Assessment ................................................................................................................... 24 Traffic and Access ............................................................................................................................... 25 Policy and Guidance ................................................................................................................. 25 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 26 Baseline.......................................................................................................................................... 27 Impact Assessment ................................................................................................................... 28 Mitigation ..................................................................................................................................... 30 6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................... 30 7 References...................................................................................................................................................... 31 8 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................... 33 Appendix A: HRA Pre-Screening Report ...................................................................................................... 34 Appendix B: Drawings ......................................................................................................................................... 35 1 Introduction The Cromarty Community Development Trust (CCDT) are planning on conducting repairs and improvements to the Nigg ferry slipway. Concerns over both the condition and potential loss of functionality of the slipway have been raised, thus, repair or replacement of the structure is required to maintain the current ferry service. Discussions were held with the CCDT regarding the importance of the service provided by the ferry between Cromarty and Nigg, and it was identified that
Recommended publications
  • SOILS in EASTER ROSS 1. the Black Isle (Part O F Sheets 83, 84, 93 and 94) 2. Cromarty and Invergordon (Sheet 94) TECHNICAL REPO
    SOILS IN EASTER ROSS 1. The Black Isle (part of Sheets 83, 84, 93 and 94) 2. Cromarty and Invergordon (Sheet 94) TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1 The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Crai giebuckler, ABERDEEN AB9 2QJ Scotland Tel: 0224 38611 Preface The two reports covering soils in Easter Ross are edited versions of general accounts, written by J.C.C. Romans, which appeared in the Macaulay Institute for Soil Research Annual Reports Nos. 38 TL first deals .w.fth AL- aiid 40. Lrie area covered by the Biack isle soil map (Parts of Sheets 83, 84, 93 and 94) and the second the area covered by the Cromarty and Invergordon soil map (Sheet 94). A bulletin describing the soils of the Black Isle will be pub1 i shed 1 ater this year. The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen. July 1984 1. THE BLACK ISLE (part of Sheets 83, 84, 93 and 94) -rL - ne Biack Isle fs a narrow peninsuia in Easter ROSS about 20 miles long lying between the Cromarty Firth and the Moray Firth. Its western boundary is taken to be the road between the Inverness district boundary and Conon Bridge. It has an area of about 280 square kilometres with a width of 7 or 8 miles in the broadest part, narrowing to 4 miles near Rosemarkie, and to less than 2 miles near Cromarty. When viewed from the hills on the north side of the Crornarty Firth the Black Isle stands out long, low and smooth in outline, with a broad central spine rising to over 240 metres at the summit of Mount Eagle.
    [Show full text]
  • Erection of 40 Bedroom Care Home at North East Of
    Agenda 5.6 item Report PLN/064/17 no THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL Committee: North Planning Applications Committee Date: 17 October 2017 Report Title: 17/02523/FUL Land To North East Of King George V Park , Ness Road, Fortrose Report By: Area Planning Manager – North Purpose/Executive Summary 1. Applicant: Parklands Developments Ltd Description of development: Erection of 40 bedroom care home Ward: 09 - Black Isle Category: Local Development 1.1 Reasons Referred to Committee: Recommended for refusal. Majority of Ward Members request application be referred to committee. All relevant matters have been taken into account when appraising this application. It is considered that the proposal does not accord with the principles and policies contained within the Development Plan and is unacceptable in terms of applicable material considerations. Recommendation 2. Members are asked to agree the recommendation to refuse as set out in section 12 of the report 3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3.1 This application is for full planning permission for the erection of a 40 bed care home (Use Class 8 – Residential Institution). It comprises accommodation wings, dayrooms, dining rooms, bedrooms with en-suite facilities and ancillary support accommodation. The applicants state the facility will offer assisted living accommodation, short term respite, post-operative and convalescence care as well as day care. 3.2 The building is of rectangular U shaped footprint, combining three narrow span, double bay accommodation units with a variation in height between 1and 1 ½ stories. The layout surrounds a courtyard fronting onto Ness Road and rear servicing is provided from the north west. Materials which are intended to reflect the colours and finishes of the conservation area are proposed: reddish stone, white render, zinc cladding to the wall and roof of the entrance block, artificial slate on pitched roofs, larch cladding on main entrance walls and between bedroom windows and all windows and door frames will be dark grey.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Flandrian sea-level changes in the Moray Firth area Haggart, B. A. How to cite: Haggart, B. A. (1982) Flandrian sea-level changes in the Moray Firth area, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9365/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk FLANDRIAN SEA-LEVEL CHANGES IN THE MORAY FIRTH AREA by B.A. HAGGART The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Durham, Department of Geography. 5 AUG W82 February 1982 STATEMENT OF COPYRIGHT The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Council Transport Programme Consultation Feedback Report
    Highland Council Transport Programme Consultation Feedback Report Contents Page number Introduction 3 Inverness and Nairn 8 Easter Ross and Black Isle 31 Badenoch and Strathspey 51 Eilean a’ Cheo 64 Wester Ross and Lochalsh 81 Lochaber 94 Caithness 109 Section 1 Introduction Introduction The Council currently spends £15.003m on providing mainstream home to school, public and dial a bus transport across Highland. At a time of reducing budgets, the Council has agreed a target to reduce the budget spent on the provision of transport by 15%. The Transport Programme aims to consider the needs of communities across Highland in the preparation for re-tendering the current services offered. It is important to understand the needs and views of communities to ensure that the services provided in the future best meet the needs of communities within the budget available. The public engagement for the transport programme commenced Monday 26th October 2015 and over a 14-week period sought to obtain feedback from groups, individuals and transport providers. This consultation included local Member engagement, a series of 15 public meetings and a survey (paper and online). The feedback from this consultation will contribute to the process of developing a range of services/routes. The consultation survey document asked questions on: • How suitable the current bus services are – what works, what should change and the gaps • Is there anything that prevents or discourages the use of bus services • What type of bus service will be important in the future • What opportunities are there for saving by altering the current network Fifteen public meetings where held throughout Highland.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Archaeological Desktop Survey Resolis Water Mains Renewal Project NH 68/65 (Area – Centred)
    Report of Archaeological Desktop Survey Resolis Water Mains Renewal Project NH 68/65 (Area – centred) Client : Halcrow Group Ltd on behalf of Scottish Water By Stuart Farrell B.A A.I.F.A F.S.A.Scot. March 2003 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Acknowledgements 3. Objectives 4. Survey Results 5. Conclusions 6. Archive 7. Discovery and Excavation 8. References Non-Technical Summary Stuart Farrell was commissioned by Halcrow Group Ltd in March 2003 to undertake an archaeological desktop survey for the Resolis Water Main Renewal Project (NH 536 / 070) centred. Work revealed a number of previously unrecorded archaeological sites including buildings relating to former crofts, an icehouse, a mill and a stretch of former railway. Further work is to be undertaken in the form of a walkover survey after new pipeline routes have been devised. 1. Introduction This report is for an archaeological desktop survey conducted for Halcrow Group Ltd on behalf of Scottish Water by the author for the Resolis Water Mains Renewal Project, Highland. 2. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following for their help during the work: - Mr. A Barnett, of Halcrow Group Ltd; - Mr. I Ford, of Halcrow Group Ltd; - Staff of Staff of Highland Council Archaeology Unit; - Staff of the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland; - Staff of the National Monuments Record of Scotland; - Staff of Highland Council Archives; - Staff of the National Library of Scotland, Map room. Stuart Farrell 39a Park Street Nairn Highland IV12 4PP Figure 1: General Survey Location Figure 2: Survey of Gordon’s Mill NMRS MS/762/91 Figure 3: Aerial Photograph of 1992 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph of 1995 Figure 5: Aerial Photograph of 1954 Figure 6: Plan of Mid Brae Cairn (after Henshall and Ritchie, 2001, 165) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation and Watching Brief Report
    Highland Archaeology Services Ltd Bringing the Past and Future Together Kirkmichael, Balblair, Black Isle Excavation and Watching Brief Report Kirkmichael Excavation Report October 2017 Kirkmichael, Balblair, Black Isle Excavation and Watching Brief Report Report No. KML16-1 Site Code KML16 Client Kirkmichael Trust Planning Ref n/a OS Grid Ref NH 70590 65855 Date/ 06/10/2017 revision Author Lynne McKeggie Summary Excavations and a watching brief were conducted by Highland Archaeology Services ltd as part of the redevelopment of Kirkmichael Kirk, Resolis in order to satisfy Scheduled Monument consent. A watching brief was conducted throughout ground-breaking works from August 2016 to August 2017 to enable installation of drains, paths, services and signage. An excavation to lower the floor levels of the Kirk was undertaken in October and November 2016. Excavations within the Kirk revealed an earlier phase of wall and some material that may be related to a building or renovation phase. There was also a considerable depth of modern material, including wooden box-like structures and excess soil from grave digging. Many modern artefacts were recovered including bottles and vases. A scatter of 17th and 18th century coins are thought to have been imported with grave digging material, along with many disarticulated and fragmentary human remains. The human remains have undergone basic analysis and have been reinterred within the graveyard. Twenty monumental grave ledger slabs were recorded during the watching brief of works for the installation of new paths and drains. All the slabs were able to be preserved in-situ. No other artefacts of interest were recovered during the watching brief.
    [Show full text]
  • Miller, Hugh Edinburgh
    THE GEOLOGICAL CURATOR VOLUME 10, NO. 7 HUGH MILLER CONTENTS EDITORIAL by Matthew Parkes ............................................................................................................................ 284 THE MUSEUMS OF A LOCAL, NATIONAL AND SUPRANATIONAL HERO: HUGH MILLER’S COLLECTIONS OVER THE DECADES by M.A. Taylor and L.I. Anderson .................................................................................................. 285 Volume 10 Number 7 THE APPEAL CIRCULAR FOR THE PURCHASE OF HUGH MILLER'S COLLECTION, 1858 by M.A. Taylor and L.I. Anderson .................................................................................................. 369 GUIDE TO THE HUGH MILLER COLLECTION IN THE ROYAL SCOTTISH MUSEUM, EDINBURGH, c. 1920 by Benjamin N. Peach, Ramsay H. Traquair, Michael A. Taylor and Lyall I. Anderson .................... 375 THE FIRST KNOWN STEREOPHOTOGRAPHS OF HUGH MILLER'S COTTAGE AND THE BUILDING OF THE HUGH MILLER MONUMENT, CROMARTY, 1859 by M. A. Taylor and A. D. Morrison-Low ..................................................................................... 429 J.G. GOODCHILD'S GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS IN THE HUGH MILLER COTTAGE, CROMARTY OF 1902 by J.G. Goodchild, M.A. Taylor and L.I. Anderson ........................................................................ 447 HUGH MILLER AND THE GRAVESTONE, 1843-4 by Sara Stevenson ............................................................................................................................ 455 HUGH MILLER GEOLOGICAL CURATORS’
    [Show full text]
  • Cromarty Homes & Heritage
    Cromarty Homes & Heritage A report on the results of a community memories project, prepared for the Cromarty & District Community Council by Mary Peteranna, with contributions from Lynn Fraser, Julie Penwright and Sandy Thomson Ryefield Farm Tore Ross-shire IV6 7SB Scotland Mob: 07776 027306 Ph: 01463 811310 [email protected] www.rossandcromarch.co.uk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following people who made significant contributions to the Cromarty Homes and Heritage project: Lindsay Hemy Caroline Hewat Wanda Mackay Paul Monk Julie Penwright Vivienne Plampton Alix Powers-Jones Henri Shepherd Anne Short Fraser Thomson Sandy Thomson Caroline Vawdrey Alison Watson Clem Watson Ronald Young And the following organisations who contributed to the project: Cromarty and District Community Council Cromarty Arts Trust Cromarty Courthouse Museum Cromarty History Society Scottish Redundant Churches Trust - Cromarty East Church The National Trust Hugh Miller’s Birthplace Cottage and Museum The project facilitators are grateful to the contributions made by all participants and attendees at the sessions and workshops. The Cromarty Image Library was an amazing source of images and information throughout the project. The project also benefitted greatly from the books by David Alston, Eric Malcolm and Fran Tilbrook. We would like to thank the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historic Monuments of Scotland (RCAHMS) and the Britain From Above project for providing Allan Kilpatrick and Brian Wilkinson to lead workshops during Cromarty Homes and Heritage and also to Ian Scrivener-Lindley at the Highland Council Historic Environment Team for conducting the Highland HER workshop. We are indebted to the Fourways Senior Citizens Club for hosting and participating in two of the project sessions, to Cromarty Primary School for participating in the schools session and preparing displays for the project exhibit, and Cromarty Youth Café for their eager enthusiasm and participation in project sessions and contributions to the project exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Report No 5
    FLOOD PREVENTION AND LAND DRAINAGE (SCOTLAND) ACT 1997 BIENNIAL REPORT No. 5, November 2005 Ross and Cromarty Date 06/02/04 and 21/05/04 Location 2 Seabank, Jemimaville, Cromarty, IV7 8LU Description Channel drains blocked and surface water breached property (beach outfall becomes buried). Property breached and sustained flooding and damage to carpets Work Channel drain and road gullies cleaned, June 04 Undertaken Work Outfall on beach requires cover Required History of Not prior to 06/02/04 flooding? Date 27/06/04 Location 1 Manse Street, Tain, IV19 1AN Description Torrential rain. Gullies NOT blocked but could not cope with surface water. Overspill breached property. Water damage to carpets at above property Work DLO attended Undertaken Work Required History of flooding? Date 15/08/04 Location 25 High Street, Alness Description Heavy Rainfall, inadequate drainage (gullies) 6” floodwater causing damage to shop stock. Stock damaged at shop Work Undertaken Work Routine maintenance of road gullies Required History of flooding? 46 FLOOD PREVENTION AND LAND DRAINAGE (SCOTLAND) ACT 1997 BIENNIAL REPORT No. 5, November 2005 Ross & Cromarty Date 16/08/04 Location 49 Ord Terrace, Strathpeffer Description Water overflowing from housing car park down onto footpath and then down between houses. Flow scouring out side of footpath/steps and edge of garden. Edge of garden at fence line eroded Work Passed to Joyce Kirkwood in Housing since car park not adopted Undertaken Work Required History of flooding? Date 18/08/04 Location Pitcanlie Brae, Nigg Description Intercepting ditch at top of slope overflowed following very heavy rainfall event. Road safety threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Ross & Cromarty East Local Plan
    ROSS & CROMARTY EAST LOCAL PLAN (As Continuing in Force, July 2015) PLANA IONADAIL ROS IS CHROMBAIDH AN EAR WrittenStatement ADOPTED PLAN FEBRUARY 2007 .ai Planning & Development Service adopt-race-wsfrontcover How to Read and Use the Plan This Local Plan (as continuing in force, July 2015) must be read in conjunction with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP). The HwLDP contains the Spatial Strategy, Vision and all general policy against which development proposals will be assessed. Ross and Cromarty East Local Plan (as continuing in force, July 2015) The adopted Highland-wide Local Development Plan replaced the Highland Structure Plan (March 2001) (except within the Cairngorms National Park) and updates/supersedes the “general policies” of the existing adopted Local Plans. In order to retain the other elements of the existing adopted Local Plans (including but not limited to; site allocations, settlement development areas not covered by the Highland-wide Local Development Plan and site specific policies) a Parliamentary Order was laid before Scottish Parliament on 16th March 2012 to enable these elements to remain in force to the extent so specified as required by Schedule 1 of The Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 As Amended. The Order is called The Town and Country Planning (Continuation in force of Local Plans) (Highland) (Scotland) Order 2012 and came into force on 1st April 2012. The elements of the adopted Local Plans continued in force at that time by the Order are included within the Retention Schedule as contained in Appendix 7 of the Highland-wide Local Development Plan. These retained elements of local plans remain retained until the time a new area Local Development Plan is prepared covering that area.
    [Show full text]
  • View Site Report
    17 Cromarty Bay Name Cromarty Bay Report Reference Number 17 WFD Code UKS7992317 An area inshore of a line drawn between the point Local Information NH7101667000 and NH7783267000, and extending to MHWS. Designated Area (km²) 8.63 Year of Designation 1998 Cromarty Bay Mussel Site - Sampling Points NH 73767 65440 Commencement of Monitoring 1998 Cromarty Bay – UKS7992317 Last Edited – 01/06/11 Page 1 17.1 Commercial Shellfish Interests There is commercial interest in harvesting cockles from the water, with one Crown Estates Commission (CEC) lease having been granted. The production area has been declassified by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). For more information on Food Standards Agency Classification please visit: http://www.food.gov.uk/scotland/safetyhygienescot/shellmonitorscot/shellclassesscot/ 17.2 Bathymetric Information This shellfish water is situated on the south side of the Cromarty Firth in an area south of the navigable channel. The area is 6 km long by a maximum of 2 km wide. The maximum charted depth (at LAT) is 5 m. Approximately half of the area is <0 m chart depth, i.e. intertidal area exposed at low tide. The slope from the min to max depth has a very shallow gradient (spread over 2 km, south to north). The substrate consists mainly of fine sand and mud material. This part of the Firth is sheltered from prevailing winds by the Black Isle but is very exposed from north and north-easterly winds, which a produces a fetch that suspends a lot of fine material into the water column. There is morphology pressure in the area due to land reclamation at Nigg Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edinburgh Gazette 13 October 1995 2603
    THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE 13 OCTOBER 1995 2603 Site Applicant/ Plans also HIGHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL RefNo available at TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (SCOTLAND) ACT 1972 CONSERVATION AREA DEVELOPMENT TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND BUILDINGS IN CONSERVATION AREAS) Period for Lodging Representations - 21 days (SCOTLAND) REGULATIONS 1987 23 Distillery Road Mr A Davidson THE underacted applications have been received by the Council Oldmeldrum 23 Distillery Road and may be inspected at the locations indicated. Any person wishing Oldmeldrum to make representations should do so in writing, within 21 days of 95/1177/1 the publication of this notice, to the appropriate Divisional Planning Extension to dwellinghouse Office as indicated. LISTED BUILDING IN CONSERVATION AREA Address Proposal/Ref No Plans Available at/ Period for Lodging Representations - 21 days Representations to 2 Gordon Street Bank of Scotland Council Offices Rear of Demolition of porch Divisional Huntly Head Office 25 Gordon Street 10 Links Place NA/1995/164 Planning Office Mound Huntly Nairn 88 High Street Edinburgh Nairn 95/1166/1 Demolish garage & formation of car park at rear of property (2) 16 Inglis Road Replacement shopfront Divisional Inverness subdivision of shop unit, Planning Office internal alterations 14 Castle Street IN/1995/809 & 810 Inverness Bourtree House Replacement of Ardersier Post 26 High Street rotting windows Office and Ardersier IN/1995/839 Divisional Plan- ning Office 14 Castle Street Inverness 19A Union Street Installation of auto- Divisional
    [Show full text]