DOCSLIB.ORG

Occurrence and Importance of Foliar Diseases on Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Central Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Occurrence and Importance of Foliar Diseases on Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Central Europe Occurrence and Importance of Foliar Diseases on Maize (Zea mays L.) in Central Europe Dissertation to obtain the Ph. D. Degree in the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany presented by Lucia Ramos Romero Born in Granada, Andalusia, Spain Göttingen, May 2016 D 7 1st Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Andreas von Tiedemann 2nd Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Petr. Karlovsky Date of submission: 26.5.2016 Dedicated to Hubert and Christa -Estudia, que un día te alegrarás- José Luis Ramos Contents Contents Abbreviations 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 1.1. Zea mays (L.): Origin, domestication and actual cultivation in Central Europe ..........1 1.2. Distribution and spread of maize pathogens across continents ................................3 1.3. Main maize leaf diseases in Central Europe .............................................................5 1.3.1. Turcicum leaf blight ...........................................................................................5 1.3.2. Kabatiella eyespot .............................................................................................6 1.4. Maize leaf diseases of secondary importance in Central Europe ..............................9 1.4.1. Common rust.....................................................................................................9 1.4.2. Northern corn leaf spot ....................................................................................10 1.4.3. Maize anthracnose ..........................................................................................10 1.4.4. Phoma spp. complex .......................................................................................12 1.5. Epidemics and potential yield losses ......................................................................14 1.6. Fungicides as control measure ...............................................................................17 1.7. Aim of the thesis .....................................................................................................19 2. Materials and Methods ................................................................................................20 2.1. Materials ................................................................................................................20 2.1.1. Media ..............................................................................................................21 2.1.2. Maize seeds ....................................................................................................22 2.2. Inventory and validation of fungal pathogens on maize leaves ...............................23 2.2.1. Sampling locations ..........................................................................................23 2.2.2. Isolation of fungal organisms ...........................................................................25 2.2.3. Preparation of single spore cultures ................................................................26 2.2.4. In vitro cultivation ............................................................................................27 2.2.5. Morphological identification of causal agents...................................................27 2.2.6. Molecular identification of Phoma spp. ............................................................29 2.2.6.1. Obtaining of DNA from pure cultures ........................................................29 2.2.6.2. Assessment of the obtained DNA yield and quality from cultures .............30 2.2.6.3. Conditions for PCR assay ........................................................................30 2.2.6.4. DNA sequencing and analysis ..................................................................31 2.2.6.5. Identification by the Fungal Biodiversity Center (CBS-KNAW) ..................31 2.2.7. Preservation techniques for fungal organisms .................................................32 I Contents 2.2.8. Production of inoculum ....................................................................................33 2.2.9. Evaluation of pathogenicity in the greenhouse ................................................34 2.2.10. Re-isolation of the pathogen from the infected tissue ......................................38 2.3. Field locations for spore trapping and fungicide application studies ........................38 2.3.1. Locations for fungicide trials ............................................................................38 2.3.2. Locations for spore trapping ............................................................................41 2.4. Epidemiological studies based on spore trapping in the field ..................................42 2.4.1. Trapping season .............................................................................................42 2.4.2. Air sampling and analysis via microscopy .......................................................42 2.4.3. Spore release, development of the disease and weather conditions ...............43 2.5. Coupling spore trapping with PCR and qPCR assays ............................................43 2.5.1. DNA extractions from the spore trap tape ........................................................43 2.5.2. Specific primer sets for amplification ...............................................................44 2.5.3. Conditions for PCR assay ...............................................................................45 2.5.4. Assessment of the obtained DNA yield from tapes via PCR ............................45 2.5.5. Conditions for qPCR assay .............................................................................46 2.5.6. Primer specificity evaluation ............................................................................46 2.5.7. Primer sensitivity evaluation ............................................................................48 2.5.8. Dilutions of DNA yield as template ..................................................................48 2.6. Control of the main diseases through fungicides in the field ...................................49 2.6.1. Treatment design and fungicide application ....................................................49 2.6.2. Disease assessment .......................................................................................53 2.6.3. Biomass and grain yield ..................................................................................55 2.6.4. Correlation of disease development with weather factors ................................55 2.7. Data management and statistical analysis ..............................................................55 2.7.1. Epidemiological studies based on spore trapping in the field ...........................55 2.7.2. Control of the main diseases through fungicides in the field ............................56 3. Results .........................................................................................................................58 3.1. Inventory and validation of fungal pathogens on maize leaves in Central Europe ...58 3.1.1. Symptoms and morphological characterisation of E. turcicum and P. sorghi ...58 3.1.2. K. zeae, B. zeicola and C. graminicola ............................................................60 3.1.3. Symptoms and pathogenicity tests for Phoma spp. .........................................69 3.1.4. Characterisation of Phoma spp. ......................................................................73 3.1.5. Characterisation of Fusarium spp. and pathogenicity tests ..............................86 3.1.6. Testing of further organisms ............................................................................89 3.1.7. Summary of the inventory................................................................................89 II Contents 3.1.8. Distribution and prevalence of fungal pathogens occurring on maize leaves ...93 3.2. Meteorological conditions .......................................................................................96 3.2.1. Mittich and Inzing ............................................................................................96 3.2.2. Ostenfeld .........................................................................................................99 3.2.3. Göttingen ...................................................................................................... 101 3.3. Epidemiological studies based on spore trapping in the field ................................ 102 3.3.1. Seasonal incidence of airborne conidia of E. turcicum ................................... 102 3.3.1.1. Inzing 2014 ............................................................................................ 102 3.3.1.2. Göttingen 2015....................................................................................... 105 3.3.1.3. Comparisons based on climatic conditions, development of Turcicum leaf blight and spore release between Inzing 2014 and Göttingen 2015 ......................... 109 3.3.2. Correlation of microscope counts and DNA yield for E. turcicum ................... 110 3.3.2.1. Inzing ..................................................................................................... 110 3.3.2.2. Göttingen ............................................................................................... 112 3.3.3. Seasonal incidence of inoculum of K. zeae analysed via qPCR .................... 114 3.3.3.1. Ostenfeld...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity of the Capnocheirides Rhododendri-Dominated Fungal Community in the Phyllosphere of Rhododendron Ferrugineum L
    Nova Hedwigia Vol. 97 (2013) Issue 1–2, 19–53 Article Stuttgart, August 2013 Diversity of the Capnocheirides rhododendri-dominated fungal community in the phyllosphere of Rhododendron ferrugineum L. Fabienne Flessa* and Gerhard Rambold University of Bayreuth, Deptartment of Mycology, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany With 3 figures and 3 tables Abstract: Individuals of Rhododendron ferrugineum at natural sites within the mountain ranges and valleys Flüela, Julier, Monstein and Grimsel (in the cantons of Graubünden and Bern, Switzerland) were analysed to determine the occurrence of pigmented epifoliar fungi in their phyllosphere. Molecular data from the fungal isolates revealed a wide range of species to be present, forming a well characterized oligospecific community, with Capnocheirides rhododendri (Mycosphaerellaceae, Capnodiales, Ascomycota) being the most frequently occurring taxon. One group of fungi was exclusively isolated from the leaf surfaces and recognized as being residential epifoliar. A second ecological group was absolutely restricted to the inner leaf tissues and considered as truly endofoliar. Members of a third group occurring in both the epifoliar and endofoliar habitats were considered to have an intermediate life habit. Members of this latter group are likely to invade the inner leaf tissues from the outside after having established a mycelium on the leaf surface. Comparison of the degree of pigmentation between cultivated strains of the strictly epifoliar and strictly endofoliar community members provided some indication that epifoliar growth is to a certain degree correlated with the ability of the fungi to develop hyphal pigmentation. The endofoliar growth is assumed to entail a complete lack or presence of a more or less weak hyphal pigmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystems and Agro-Biodiversity Across Small and Large-Scale Maize Production Systems, Feeder Study to the “TEEB for Agriculture and Food”
    Ecosystems and agro-biodiversity across small and large-scale maize production systems, feeder study to the “TEEB for Agriculture and Food” i Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge TEEB and the Global Alliance for the Future of Food on supporting this project. We would also like to acknowledge the technical expertise provided by CONABIO´s network of experts outside and inside the institution and the knowledge gained through many years of hard and very robust scientific work of the Mexican research community (and beyond) tightly linked to maize genetic diversity resources. Finally we would specially like to thank the small-scale maize men and women farmers who through time and space have given us the opportunity of benefiting from the biological, genetic and cultural resources they care for. Certification All activities by Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, acting in administrative matters through Nacional Financiera Fideicomiso Fondo para la Biodiversidad (“CONABIO/FFB”) were and are consistent under the Internal Revenue Code Sections 501 (c)(3) and 509(a)(1), (2) or (3). If any lobbying was conducted by CONABIO/FFB (whether or not discussed in this report), CONABIO/FFB complied with the applicable limits of Internal Revenue Code Sections 501(c)(3) and/or 501(h) and 4911. CONABIO/FFB warrants that it is in full compliance with its Grant Agreement with the New venture Fund, dated May 15, 2015, and that, if the grant was subject to any restrictions, all such restrictions were observed. How to cite: CONABIO. 2017. Ecosystems and agro-biodiversity across small and large-scale maize production systems, feeder study to the “TEEB for Agriculture and Food”.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing Maize Diseases in Latin America
    Diagnosing Maize Diseases in Latin America Carlos Casela, Bobby (R.B.) Renfro, Anatole F. Krattiger Editors Published in collaboration with PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. No. 9-1998 Diagnosing Maize Diseases in Latin America Carlos Casela, Bobby (R.B.) Renfro, Anatole F. Krattiger Editors Published in collaboration with PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. No. 9-1998 Published by: The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Copyright: (1998) International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is properly acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission from the copyright holder. Citation: Diagnosing Maize Diseases in Latin America. C.Casela, R.Renfro and A.F. Krattiger (eds). 1998. ISAAA Briefs No. 9. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY and EMBRAPA, Brasilia. pp. 57. Cover pictures: Pictures taken during the field visits and the diagnostics training workshop in Brazil by ISAAA (K.V. Raman). Available from: The ISAAA Centers listed below. For a list of other ISAAA publications, contact the nearest Center: ISAAA AmeriCenter ISAAA AfriCenter ISAAA EuroCenter ISAAA SEAsiaCenter 260 Emerson Hall c/o CIP John Innes Centre c/o IRRI Cornell University PO 25171 Colney Lane PO Box 933 Ithaca, NY 14853 Nairobi Norwich NR4 7UH 1099 Manila USA Kenya United Kingdom The Philippines [email protected] Also on: www.isaaa.cornell.edu Cost: Cost US$ 10 per copy. Available free of charge for developing countries. Contents Introduction and Overview: Diagnosing Maize Diseases with Proprietary Biotechnology Applications Transferred from Pioneer Hi-Bred International to Brazil and Latin America................................................................1 Anatole Krattiger, Ellen S.
    [Show full text]
  • Zea Mays Subsp
    Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2003)11 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 23-Jul-2003 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2003)11 THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Cancels & replaces the same document of 02 July 2003 Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 27 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON THE BIOLOGY OF ZEA MAYS SUBSP. MAYS (MAIZE) English - Or. English JT00147699 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ENV/JM/MONO(2003)11 Also published in the Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology: No. 4, Industrial Products of Modern Biotechnology Intended for Release to the Environment: The Proceedings of the Fribourg Workshop (1996) No. 5, Consensus Document on General Information concerning the Biosafety of Crop Plants Made Virus Resistant through Coat Protein Gene-Mediated Protection (1996) No. 6, Consensus Document on Information Used in the Assessment of Environmental Applications Involving Pseudomonas (1997) No. 7, Consensus Document on the Biology of Brassica napus L. (Oilseed Rape) (1997) No. 8, Consensus Document on the Biology of Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum (Potato) (1997) No. 9, Consensus Document on the Biology of Triticum aestivum (Bread Wheat) (1999) No. 10, Consensus Document on General Information Concerning the Genes and Their Enzymes that Confer Tolerance to Glyphosate Herbicide (1999) No. 11, Consensus Document on General Information Concerning the Genes and Their Enzymes that Confer Tolerance to Phosphinothricin Herbicide (1999) No.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILIA PHAKOPSORACEAE ( Fungi: Uredinales) GENERALIDADES Y AFINIDADES
    Familia Phakopsoraceae..... FAMILIA PHAKOPSORACEAE ( Fungi: Uredinales) GENERALIDADES Y AFINIDADES Pablo Buriticá Céspedes1 RESUMEN Se presentan aspectos generales sobre importancia de la familia Phakopsoraceae, afinidad y relaciones filogenéticas entre géneros, rango de hospedantes, distribución geográfica y ciclos de vida. Palabras clave: Uredinales, Phakopsoraceae. ABSTRACT General aspects in the Phakopsoraceae family importance, philogenetic affinities within genera, hosts range, geografic distribution and life cycles are presented. Key words: Uredinales, Phakopsoraceae. INTRODUCCION Dentro del concepto de clasificación taxonómica, la agrupación en familias, para el Orden Uredinales (Fungi: Basidiomycota: Heterobasidiomycia), no ha sido aún, bien desarrollado y por ende su uso común y rutinario es incipiente, obviado o rechazado. Sin embargo, en los últimos años se ha despertado mucho interés en este tópico, dentro de los Uredinólogos, debido a los avances obtenidos en el conocimiento de los distintos géneros estudiados como grupos (Cummins, 1959; Cummins e Hiratsuka, 1983); al valor taxonómico de los espermogonios en el nivel supragenérico (Hiratsuka y Cummins, 1963); a los estudios globales de los uredinios (Sathe, 1977); a los estudios de evolución, diversidad y delimitación de grupos de géneros dentro de las familias u órdenes de las plantas hospedantes (Leppik, 1972; Savile, 1976, 1979); a los estudios morfológicos aplicados a las variantes evolutivas de las estructuras en los ciclos de vida (Hennen y Buriticá, 1980), especialmente, en Endophyllaceae (Buriticá, 1991) y Pucciniosireae (Buriticá y Hennen, 1980); a los estudios sobre la ontogenia de los esporos (Hughes, 1970); y, al tratamiento sistemático de varios grupos, como Pucciniosireae (Buriticá y Hennen, 1980), géneros Chaconiaceos (Ono, 1983), Raveneliaceae (Leppik, 1972; Savile, 1989) y Phakopsoraceae (Buriticá, 1994, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Colletotrichum – Names in Current Use
    Online advance Fungal Diversity Colletotrichum – names in current use Hyde, K.D.1,7*, Cai, L.2, Cannon, P.F.3, Crouch, J.A.4, Crous, P.W.5, Damm, U. 5, Goodwin, P.H.6, Chen, H.7, Johnston, P.R.8, Jones, E.B.G.9, Liu, Z.Y.10, McKenzie, E.H.C.8, Moriwaki, J.11, Noireung, P.1, Pennycook, S.R.8, Pfenning, L.H.12, Prihastuti, H.1, Sato, T.13, Shivas, R.G.14, Tan, Y.P.14, Taylor, P.W.J.15, Weir, B.S.8, Yang, Y.L.10,16 and Zhang, J.Z.17 1,School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chaing Rai, Thailand 2Research & Development Centre, Novozymes, Beijing 100085, PR China 3CABI, Bakeham Lane, Egham, Surrey TW20 9TY, UK and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK 4Cereal Disease Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1551 Lindig Street, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 5CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 6School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada 7International Fungal Research & Development Centre, The Research Institute of Resource Insects, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Bailongsi, Kunming 650224, PR China 8Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 9BIOTEC Bioresources Technology Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, NSTDA, 113 Thailand Science Park, Paholyothin Road, Khlong 1, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand 10Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550006 PR China 11Hokuriku Research Center, National Agricultural Research Center,
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Genetic Characterization of Ptr Toxc-Tsc1 Interaction
    MOLECULAR GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF PTR TOXC-TSC1 INTERACTION AND COMPARATIVE GENOMICS OF PYRENOPHORA TRITICI-REPENTIS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Gayan Kanishka Kariyawasam In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Department: Plant Pathology November 2018 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title MOLECULAR GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION OF PTR TOXC-TSC1 INTERACTION AND COMPARATIVE GENOMICS OF PYRENOPHORA TRITICI-REPENTIS By Gayan Kanishka Kariyawasam The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Zhaohui Liu Chair Dr. Shaobin Zhong Dr. Justin D. Faris Dr. Phillip E. McClean Dr. Timothy L. Friesen Approved: November 7, 2018 Jack Rasmussen Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Tan spot of wheat, caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, is an economically important disease worldwide. The disease system is known to involve three pairs of interactions between fungal-produced necrotrophic effectors (NEs) and the wheat sensitivity genes, namely Ptr ToxA- Tsn1, Ptr ToxB-Tsc2 and Ptr ToxC-Tsc1, all of which result in susceptibility. Many lines of evidence also suggested the involvement of additional fungal virulence and host resistance factors. Due to the non-proteinaceous nature, Ptr ToxC, has not been purified and the fungal gene (s) controlling Ptr ToxC production is unknown. The objective for the first part of research is to map the fungal gene (s) controlling Ptr ToxC production. Therefore, A bi-parental fungal population segregating for Ptr ToxC production was first developed from genetically modified heterothallic strains of AR CrossB10 (Ptr ToxC producer) and 86-124 (Ptr ToxC non-producer), and then was genotyped and phenotyped.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification of Fungi
    Molecular Identification of Fungi Youssuf Gherbawy l Kerstin Voigt Editors Molecular Identification of Fungi Editors Prof. Dr. Youssuf Gherbawy Dr. Kerstin Voigt South Valley University University of Jena Faculty of Science School of Biology and Pharmacy Department of Botany Institute of Microbiology 83523 Qena, Egypt Neugasse 25 [email protected] 07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-05041-1 e-ISBN 978-3-642-05042-8 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-05042-8 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009938949 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMXDesign GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany, kindly supported by ‘leopardy.com’ Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Dedicated to Prof. Lajos Ferenczy (1930–2004) microbiologist, mycologist and member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, one of the most outstanding Hungarian biologists of the twentieth century Preface Fungi comprise a vast variety of microorganisms and are numerically among the most abundant eukaryotes on Earth’s biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Estudio De La Evolución De Un Fitopatógeno: Genómica Comparada Del Hongo Patógeno De Maíz Colletotrichum Graminicola
    Universidad de salamanca FACULTAD DE BIOLOGÍA DEPARTAMENTO DE MICROBIOLOGÍA Y GENÉTICA ÁREA: GENÉTICA TESIS DOCTORAL Estudio de la evolución de un fitopatógeno: Genómica comparada del hongo patógeno de maíz Colletotrichum graminicola GABRIEL EDUARDO RECH SALAMANCA, 2013 UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA Facultad de Biología Departamento de Microbiología y Genética Área: Genética Centro Hispano-Luso de Investigaciones Agrarias Insight into the evolution of a plant pathogen: Comparative genomic analysis of the fungal maize pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola PhD Thesis Programa de Doctorado: Agrobiotecnología Órgano responsable del Programa de Doctorado: Departamento de Fisiología Vegetal Gabriel Eduardo Rech Salamanca, 2013 UNIVERSIDAD DE SALAMANCA Facultad de Biología Departamento de Microbiología y Genética Área: Genética Centro Hispano-Luso de Investigaciones Agrarias Estudio de la evolución de un fitopatógeno: Genómica comparada del hongo patógeno de maíz Colletotrichum graminicola Tesis Doctoral Programa de Doctorado: Agrobiotecnología Órgano responsable del Programa de Doctorado: Departamento de Fisiología Vegetal Gabriel Eduardo Rech Salamanca, 2013 D. Luis Román Fernández Lago, Director del Departamento de Microbiología y Genética de la Facultad de Biología de la Universidad de Salamanca y Dña. Berta Dopico Rivela, Directora del Departamento de Fisiología Vegetal de la Facultad de Biología de la Universidad de Salamanca, órgano responsable del Programa de Doctorado en Agrobiotecnología CERTIFICAMOS: Que la presente Memoria titulada “Estudio de la evolución de un fitopatógeno: Genómica comparada del hongo patógeno de maíz Colletotrichum graminicola”, ha sido realizada en el Departamento de Microbiología y Genética de la Facultad de Biología y el Centro Hispano-Luso de Investigaciones Agrarias de la Universidad de Salamanca por el Licenciado D. Gabriel Eduardo Rech, bajo la dirección del Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Fungal Extremes
    Studies in Mycology 61 (2008) Black fungal extremes Edited by G.S. de Hoog and M. Grube CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands An institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences Black fungal extremes STUDIE S IN MYCOLOGY 61, 2008 Studies in Mycology The Studies in Mycology is an international journal which publishes systematic monographs of filamentous fungi and yeasts, and in rare occasions the proceedings of special meetings related to all fields of mycology, biotechnology, ecology, molecular biology, pathology and systematics. For instructions for authors see www.cbs.knaw.nl. EXECUTIVE EDITOR Prof. dr Robert A. Samson, CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] LAYOUT EDITOR S Manon van den Hoeven-Verweij, CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Kasper Luijsterburg, CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] SCIENTIFIC EDITOR S Prof. dr Uwe Braun, Martin-Luther-Universität, Institut für Geobotanik und Botanischer Garten, Herbarium, Neuwerk 21, D-06099 Halle, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Prof. dr Pedro W. Crous, CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] Prof. dr David M. Geiser, Department of Plant Pathology, 121 Buckhout Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, U.S.A. 16802. E-mail: [email protected] Dr Lorelei L. Norvell, Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Blvd, Portland, OR, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 9B Taxonomy to Genus
    Fungus and Lichen Genera in the NEMF Database Taxonomic hierarchy: phyllum > class (-etes) > order (-ales) > family (-ceae) > genus. Total number of genera in the database: 526 Anamorphic fungi (see p. 4), which are disseminated by propagules not formed from cells where meiosis has occurred, are presently not grouped by class, order, etc. Most propagules can be referred to as "conidia," but some are derived from unspecialized vegetative mycelium. A significant number are correlated with fungal states that produce spores derived from cells where meiosis has, or is assumed to have, occurred. These are, where known, members of the ascomycetes or basidiomycetes. However, in many cases, they are still undescribed, unrecognized or poorly known. (Explanation paraphrased from "Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th Edition.") Principal authority for this taxonomy is the Dictionary of the Fungi and its online database, www.indexfungorum.org. For lichens, see Lecanoromycetes on p. 3. Basidiomycota Aegerita Poria Macrolepiota Grandinia Poronidulus Melanophyllum Agaricomycetes Hyphoderma Postia Amanitaceae Cantharellales Meripilaceae Pycnoporellus Amanita Cantharellaceae Abortiporus Skeletocutis Bolbitiaceae Cantharellus Antrodia Trichaptum Agrocybe Craterellus Grifola Tyromyces Bolbitius Clavulinaceae Meripilus Sistotremataceae Conocybe Clavulina Physisporinus Trechispora Hebeloma Hydnaceae Meruliaceae Sparassidaceae Panaeolina Hydnum Climacodon Sparassis Clavariaceae Polyporales Gloeoporus Steccherinaceae Clavaria Albatrellaceae Hyphodermopsis Antrodiella
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of Plant and Animal Pathogens in the Ascomycota
    Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology (2001) 59, 165±187 doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0355, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on MINI-REVIEW The phylogeny of plant and animal pathogens in the Ascomycota MARY L. BERBEE* Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada (Accepted for publication August 2001) What makes a fungus pathogenic? In this review, phylogenetic inference is used to speculate on the evolution of plant and animal pathogens in the fungal Phylum Ascomycota. A phylogeny is presented using 297 18S ribosomal DNA sequences from GenBank and it is shown that most known plant pathogens are concentrated in four classes in the Ascomycota. Animal pathogens are also concentrated, but in two ascomycete classes that contain few, if any, plant pathogens. Rather than appearing as a constant character of a class, the ability to cause disease in plants and animals was gained and lost repeatedly. The genes that code for some traits involved in pathogenicity or virulence have been cloned and characterized, and so the evolutionary relationships of a few of the genes for enzymes and toxins known to play roles in diseases were explored. In general, these genes are too narrowly distributed and too recent in origin to explain the broad patterns of origin of pathogens. Co-evolution could potentially be part of an explanation for phylogenetic patterns of pathogenesis. Robust phylogenies not only of the fungi, but also of host plants and animals are becoming available, allowing for critical analysis of the nature of co-evolutionary warfare. Host animals, particularly human hosts have had little obvious eect on fungal evolution and most cases of fungal disease in humans appear to represent an evolutionary dead end for the fungus.
    [Show full text]