Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program PROJECT NUMBER 12-425 Habitat Use at Multiple Scales by Pinyon-Juniper Birds on Department of Defense Lands III: Landscape, Territory/Colony, and Nest Scale Kristine Johnson, Lynn Wickersham, Jacqueline Smith, Giancarlo Sadoti, Teri Neville, John Wickersham, & Carol Finley March 2014 Habitat Use at Multiple Scales by Pinyon‐Juniper Birds on Department of Defense Lands III: Landscape, Territory/Colony, and Nest Scale Final Project Report Kristine Johnson, Lynn Wickersham, Jacqueline Smith, Giancarlo Sadoti, Teri Neville, John Wickersham, and Carol Finley Natural Heritage New Mexico Publication 14-GTR-381 March 2014 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Figures .............................................................................................................................. 6 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 7 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 9 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 11 Pinyon-Juniper Habitats and Wildlife ....................................................................................... 11 Gray Vireo ................................................................................................................................. 13 Pinyon Jay ................................................................................................................................. 14 The Project ................................................................................................................................ 14 Study Areas ............................................................................................................................... 17 GRAY VIREO: METHODS......................................................................................................... 18 Gray Vireo Landscape-Scale ..................................................................................................... 18 Gray Vireo and Pinyon Jay Landscape Scale ............................................................................ 20 Gray Vireo Territory Scale ........................................................................................................ 21 Gray Vireo Within-territory Nest-scale Analyses ..................................................................... 27 GRAY VIREO: RESULTS........................................................................................................... 29 Landscape-scale Models CTTA ................................................................................................ 29 Banding .................................................................................................................................. 29 Territories .............................................................................................................................. 30 Landscape Model ................................................................................................................... 31 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................. 31 Landscape-scale Models KAFB ................................................................................................ 32 Banding .................................................................................................................................. 32 Territories .............................................................................................................................. 32 Landscape Model ................................................................................................................... 34 Landscape-scale Models WSMR .............................................................................................. 34 Territories .............................................................................................................................. 34 Landscape Model ................................................................................................................... 34 Territory-scale Models .............................................................................................................. 39 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................. 39 3 Territories vs. Unused Areas ................................................................................................. 39 Gray Vireo Model Predictions ............................................................................................... 46 Gray Vireo Model Validation ................................................................................................ 47 Gray Vireo Within-territory Nest-site Selection ....................................................................... 52 GRAY VIREO: DISCUSSION .................................................................................................... 57 Territory Size and Site Fidelity ................................................................................................. 57 Landscape-scale Habitat Use .................................................................................................... 57 Gray Vireo Territories vs. Unused Areas .................................................................................. 58 Gray Vireo Territory Model Predictions and Validation ....................................................... 60 Gray Vireo Within-territory Nest-site Selection ....................................................................... 60 Gray Vireo Habitat Requirements and Management ............................................................ 61 Relationship to Military Activities ........................................................................................ 63 PINYON JAY: METHODS .......................................................................................................... 64 Pinyon Jay Landscape-scale ...................................................................................................... 64 KAFB..................................................................................................................................... 64 WSMR ................................................................................................................................... 65 KAFB and WSMR................................................................................................................. 66 Pinyon Jay Landscape-scale Habitat Modeling ........................................................................ 67 Pinyon Jay Colony-scale Predictive Modeling ........................................................................ 67 Pinyon Jay Within-colony Nest-scale Analyses ....................................................................... 72 PINYON JAY: RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 73 Landscape-scale Habitat Models KAFB ................................................................................... 73 Banding/Transmitters ............................................................................................................ 73 Flock Size .............................................................................................................................. 74 Home Ranges ......................................................................................................................... 75 Caching Areas........................................................................................................................ 79 Landscape Model ................................................................................................................... 79 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................. 81 Landscape-scale Habitat Models WSMR ................................................................................. 82 Banding .................................................................................................................................. 82 Flock Size .............................................................................................................................. 82 4 Location Data ........................................................................................................................ 82 Home Ranges ......................................................................................................................... 83 Landscape Model ................................................................................................................... 84 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................. 85 Colony-scale Model KAFB ....................................................................................................... 87 Colony-scale Model WSMR ..................................................................................................... 88 Validation of Pinyon Jay Colony-scale Models ........................................................................ 92 Pinyon Jay Within-colony Nest-site Selection .........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Fauna of the San Luis Valley Veryl F
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Fauna of the San Luis Valley Veryl F. Keen, 1971, pp. 137-139 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Joanne K
    Curriculum Vitae Joanne K. Itami, Ph.D. Office Address Department of Biology, 207 SSB University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812 Phone: 218 726 6319, FAX: 218 726 8142 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION B.S. 1978 Biology/Human Ecology Double Major, College of Idaho, Caldwell, Idaho, Biology Senior Thesis: Baggies Technique Of Culturing Chick Embryos Human Ecology Senior Thesis: Aesthetics as a Principle of Human Ecology M.S. 1982 Biology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, Thesis: Agonistic and Territorial Behavior of the Vinegaroon, Mastigoproctus giganteus (Arachnida: Uropygida). Advisor: C.N. Slobodchikoff Ph.D. 1988 Zoology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona. Dissertation: Life History and Ecology of the Juniper Twig Pruner, Styloxus bicolor, (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Advisor: Peter W. Price 1981 Fern Mountain Field Ecology School, Museum of Northern Arizona University and Northern Arizona University. Five week course on field ecological research techniques. Instructor: T.G. Whitham 1996 Six month training in molecular techniques for population biology, Supervisor: Dr. D. J. Howard, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University. 1998 Workshop: Techniques in Molecular Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. Laboratory course in recombinant DNA techniques. Instructors: I. Rajagopal and M. Howell RESEARCH INTERESTS: Evolutionary Ecology; Animal-Plant Interactions; Animal Behavior; Population Biology TEACHING AND ADVISING EXPERIENCE: Academic Advisor: 2007-2013 College of Science & Engineering, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH 2004-2007 Biology Department, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Lecturer: 2013-present Assistant Professor, instructor, full-time BIOL1011/1013 General Biology I (5 cr lecture, lab, discussion) BIOL 3701 Animal Diversity (4 cr lecture and lab) BIOL 3987 Communications in Biology (2 cr lecture and seminar) 2003-07 Assistant Professor, non-regular, part-time BIOL1087 Freshman Seminar: Darwinian Medicine (3 cr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History
    Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Scenic Trips to the Geologic Past Series: No. 1—SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO No. 2—TAOS—RED RIVER—EAGLE NEST, NEW MEXICO, CIRCLE DRIVE No. 3—ROSWELL—CAPITAN—RUIDOSO AND BOTTOMLESS LAKES STATE PARK, NEW MEXICO No. 4—SOUTHERN ZUNI MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO No. 5—SILVER CITY—SANTA RITA—HURLEY, NEW MEXICO No. 6—TRAIL GUIDE TO THE UPPER PECOS, NEW MEXICO No. 7—HIGH PLAINS NORTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO, RATON- CAPULIN MOUNTAIN—CLAYTON No. 8—MOSlAC OF NEW MEXICO'S SCENERY, ROCKS, AND HISTORY No. 9—ALBUQUERQUE—ITS MOUNTAINS, VALLEYS, WATER, AND VOLCANOES No. 10—SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO No. 11—CUMBRE,S AND TOLTEC SCENIC RAILROAD C O V E R : REDONDO PEAK, FROM JEMEZ CANYON (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by John Whiteside) Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, and History (Forest Service, U.S.D.A., by Robert W . Talbott) WHITEWATER CANYON NEAR GLENWOOD SCENIC TRIPS TO THE GEOLOGIC PAST NO. 8 Mosaic of New Mexico's Scenery, Rocks, a n d History edited by PAIGE W. CHRISTIANSEN and FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1972 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY STIRLING A. COLGATE, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES FRANK E. KOTTLOWSKI, Director BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Leonard DeLayo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed William G. Abbott, President, 1961-1979, Hobbs George A. Cowan, 1972-1975, Los Alamos Dave Rice, 1972-1977, Carlsbad Steve Torres, 1967-1979, Socorro James R.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview Desert Peaks Complex of the Organ Mountains – Desert Peaks National Monument Doña Ana County, New Mexico
    Cultural Resources Overview Desert Peaks Complex of the Organ Mountains – Desert Peaks National Monument Doña Ana County, New Mexico Myles R. Miller, Lawrence L. Loendorf, Tim Graves, Mark Sechrist, Mark Willis, and Margaret Berrier Report submitted to the Wilderness Society Sacred Sites Research, Inc. July 18, 2017 Public Version This version of the Cultural Resources overview is intended for public distribution. Sensitive information on site locations, including maps and geographic coordinates, has been removed in accordance with State and Federal antiquities regulations. Executive Summary Since the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in 1966, at least 50 cultural resource surveys or reviews have been conducted within the boundaries of the Desert Peaks Complex. These surveys were conducted under Sections 106 and 110 of the NHPA. More recently, local avocational archaeologists and supporters of the Organ Monument-Desert Peaks National Monument have recorded several significant rock art sites along Broad and Valles canyons. A review of site records on file at the New Mexico Historic Preservation Division and consultations with regional archaeologists compiled information on over 160 prehistoric and historic archaeological sites in the Desert Peaks Complex. Hundreds of additional sites have yet to be discovered and recorded throughout the complex. The known sites represent over 13,000 years of prehistory and history, from the first New World hunters who gazed at the nighttime stars to modern astronomers who studied the same stars while peering through telescopes on Magdalena Peak. Prehistoric sites in the complex include ancient hunting and gathering sites, earth oven pits where agave and yucca were baked for food and fermented mescal, pithouse and pueblo villages occupied by early farmers of the Southwest, quarry sites where materials for stone tools were obtained, and caves and shrines used for rituals and ceremonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Inventory for Hubbell Trading Post National Historic Site
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Mammal Inventory for Hubbell Trading Post National Historic Site Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/376 ON THE COVER The deer mouse was one of the most abundant mammal species found during this inventory. Photograph by: John Good Mammal Inventory for Hubbell Trading Post National Historic Site Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/376 Shauna Haymond Holistic Wildlife Services NM, LLC 112 Hampton Roads Avenue Hampton, VA 23661 Richard E. Sherwin Department of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Science Christopher Newport University 1 University Place Newport News, VA 23606-2998 September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natu- ral resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientif- ically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Thanks to the New Mexico Humanities Council and the Western National Parks and Monuments Association for their important contributions to this study. DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Apache, Coconino, Navajo Counties, Arizona; Bernalillo, Cibola, De Baca, Guadalupe, Lincoln, McKinley, Mora, Otero, Santa Fe, Sandoval, Torrance, Valencia Counties, New Mexico The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of designating the routes known as the “Long Walk” of the Mescalero Apache and the Navajo people (1862-1868) as a national historic trail under the study provisions of the National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543). This study provides necessary information for evaluating the national significance of the Long Walk, which refers to the U.S. Army’s removal of the Mescalero Apache and Navajo people from their homelands to the Bosque Redondo Reservation in eastern New Mexico, and for potential designation of a national historic trail. Detailed administrative recommendations would be developed through the subsequent preparation of a comprehensive management plan if a national historic trail is designated. The three criteria for national historic trails, as defined in the National Trails System Act, have been applied and have been met for the proposed Long Walk National Historic Trail. The trail routes possess a high degree of integrity and significant potential for historical interest based on historic interpretation and appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Forests for Fish and Wildlife
    Wildlife Habitat Management Institute Managing Forests for Fish and Wildlife December 2002 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Leaflet Number 18 Forested areas can be managed with a wide variety of objectives, ranging from allowing natural processes to dictate long-term condition without active management of any kind, to maximizing production of wood products on the shortest rotations possible. The primary purpose of this document is to show how fish and wildlife habitat management can be effectively integrated into the management of forestlands that are subject to periodic timber harvest activities. For forestlands that are not managed for production of timber or other forest products, many of the principles U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station in this leaflet also apply. Introduction Succession of Forest Vegetation Forests in North America provide a wide variety of In order to meet both timber production and wildlife important natural resource functions. Although management goals, landowners and managers need commercial forests may be best known for production to understand how forest vegetation responds following of pulp, lumber, and other wood products, they also timber management, or silvicultural prescriptions, or supply valuable fish and wildlife habitat, recreational other disturbances. Forest vegetation typically opportunities, water quality protection, and other progresses from one plant community to another over natural resource benefits. In approximately two-thirds time. This forest succession can be described in four of the forest land (land that is at least 10% tree- stages: covered) in the United States, harvest of wood products plays an integral role in how these lands are managed. Sustainable forest management applies Fish and Wildlife Air and Water biological, economic, and social principles to forest Wood Products Habitat Quality regeneration, management, and conservation to meet the specific goals of landowners or managers.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Hazard Map, Gila-Las Cruces BLM Dispatch Zone - 2015
    Flight Hazard Map, Gila-Las Cruces BLM Dispatch Zone - 2015 Gila - Las Cruces Dispatch Zone A1 Atlas Page60 Name Index Quemado General Legend 60 Springerville Datil Socorro US Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service Major Reservoir Aragon Luna B1 B2 380 Reserve FS Wilderness Tribal Lands Major Stream 25 Ruidoso FS Primitive Area National Park Service Interstate Winston 54 Glenwood Truth or 70 191 Consequences Bureau of Land Mgmt. Private U.S. Highway 180 C1 C2 Cliff Kingston Alamogordo Silver Mimbres City BLM Wilderness State State Highway 70 70 BLM WSA State Game and Fish District Office Las Lordsburg D1 Cruces Deming D2 10 Bureau of Reclamation State or Local Park Forest Service Facility Dept. of Agriculture Other Federal Agency Supervisors Office El Paso 62 Socorro E1 E2 Dept. of Defense Mexico Dept. of Energy Urban Area Flight Hazards Legend Helipad/Heliport Visual Route Leg Identifier Wind Hazard Atlas Page Scale Lookout Visual Route Windfarm > 200 ft AGL 1:400,000 Repeater Visual Route Outer Boundary Military Operations Area (MOA) 1 inch = 6.3 miles Local Airstrip Slow Route Leg Identifier Prohibited, Restricted or Warning Area (Printed on 11" x 17" landscape layout) Civil Heliport Slow Route Air Refueling Route (AFR) 0 5 10 20 Civil Airport w/Facilities Slow Route Outer Boundary AFR Airspace Miles Civil Airport w/o Facilities Instrument Route Leg Identifier Parachute Jumping Area Military Airport Instrument Route Dispatch Area Tower/Building < 200 ft AGL Instrument Route Outer Boundary Tower/Building > 200 ft AGL Major Power Transmission
    [Show full text]
  • Open Thesis Maya E. Nehme.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Entomology DEVELOPING MONITORING TRAPS FOR THE ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE A Dissertation in Entomology & Comparative and International Education by Maya E. Nehme © 2009 Maya E. Nehme Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2009 The dissertation of Maya E. Nehme was reviewed and approved* by the following: Kelli Hoover Associate Professor of Entomology Dissertation Advisor Co-Chair of Committee Edwin Rajotte Professor of Entomology, IPM Coordinator and CI ED joint faculty Co-Chair of Committee Thomas Baker Professor of Entomology Melody Keena US Forest Service Research Entomologist and Adjunct Faculty of Entomology Special member David Baker Professor of Education, Professor of Sociology Gary Felton Professor of Entomology Head of the Department of Entomology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT Anoplophora glabripennis (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae), commonly known as the Asian longhorned beetle, is a wood-boring invasive species introduced from Asia to North America and Europe through solid wood packing material. A. glabripennis is a serious pest both in China and the U.S. This research project was developed in response to the need for efficient monitoring traps to assess population density and dispersal in the field and to detect new introductions at ports of entry. The first stages of the project aimed at filling the gaps in our knowledge of the effect of semiochemicals on A. glabripennis adult behavior and exploring potential use of these chemicals for monitoring purposes. Semiochemicals studied were the male- produced putative volatile pheromone vbutan-1-ol and 4-(n-heptyloxy)butanal) and plant volatiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Features of the Tularosa Basin Place Names in New Mexico, As You Might Imagine, Often Derive from Native American, Spanish, and Anglo Words and Family Names
    National Park Service White Sands Department of the Interior White Sands National Monument Features of the Tularosa Basin Place names in New Mexico, as you might imagine, often derive from Native American, Spanish, and Anglo words and family names. The Tularosa Basin is no exception—the word “tularosa” is Spanish for “reddish reeds.” Like much of the American Southwest, the basin is full of such colorful place names. Below you’ll find a description of the most significant features, arranged to correspond with the accompanying map. The Chupadera Mesa is an upland rising at the north end of the Tularosa Basin. Chupadera probably refers to “sinkholes”—although geographer T. M. Pearce says that it could also refer to “sucking insects.” Chupadero The Oscura Mountains form the northwest border of the Tularosa Mesa basin. Oscura means “dark” in Spanish, and with their piñon and juniper forested tops, the Oscura Mountains can appear darker than the neighboring San Andres Mountain range to the south. The highest elevation in the range is Oscura Peak at 8,732 feet high. The San Andres Mountains border the Tularosa Basin on the west. The range extends approximately 75 miles north to south. The highest Oscura point is Salinas Peak, with an elevation just under 9,000 feet. The Mountains southern San Andres Mountains are home to a wildlife refuge of the same name. However, the San Andres National Wildlife Refuge and the San Andres Mountains are within the boundaries of the White * Carrizozo Sands Missile Range and therefore closed to public access. The Oscura Mountains to the north are separated from the San Andres range at Mockingbird Gap, while the Organ Mountains to the south are separated from the San Andres by San Augustin Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Philmont Mammals
    PHILMONT AREA MAMMALS Northern Pocket Gopher (Thomomys talpoides) CF LAGOMORPHA INSECTIVORA Ochotonidae – Pikas Heteromyidae – Pocket Mice & Kangaroo Rats Soricidae – Shrews Pika (Ochotona princes) OT Silky Pocket Mouse (Perognathus flavus) GL, DS Masked Shrew (Sorex cinereus) CF Hispid Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus hispidus) GL Merriam Shrew (Sorex merriam) CF Leporidae – Hares & Rabbits Ord’s Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ordii) GL, DS Montane Shrew (Sorex monticolus) CF Desert Cottontail (Sylvilagus auduboni) WL, GL. Dwarf Shrew (Sorex nanus) CF DS Castoridae – Beavers Northern Water Shrew (Sorex palustris) CF Mountain Cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttalli) CF, WL, Beaver (Castor canadensis) OT Desert Shrew (Notiosorex crawfordi) GL, DS DS Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) CF Muridae – Typical Rats & Mice CHIROPTERA Black-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus californicus) WL, Western Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys Vespertilionidae – Typical Bats GL, DS megalotis) GL, DS Cave Myotis (Myotis velifer) DS White-tailed Jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii) GL Plains Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys Yuma Myotis Myotis yumanensis WL, GL, DS montanus) GL Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifigus) CF, WL RODENTIA Brush Mouse (Peromyscus boylii) WL Long-eared Myotis (Myotis evotis) CF Sciuridae – Squirrels White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) GL Fringed Myotis (Myotis thysanodes) CF, WL,GL Least Chipmunk (Tamias minimus) CF Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) CF, WL, Long-legged Myotis (Myotis volans) CF Colorado Chipmunk (Tamias quadrivittatus) CF, GL, DS California Myotis (Myotis
    [Show full text]