DOCSLIB.ORG

December 2011, Issue 43 Spot the Difference ! Inside This Issue 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December 2011, Issue 43 Spot the Difference ! Inside This Issue 2 1 Common Knowledge December 2011, Issue 43 Spot the Difference ! Inside this issue 2. Community Safety; What to Report to Whom 3. Rookery Centenary 4. Streatham Common in Mitcham?; Memories 5. Recent and Next Events; Filling the Chair 6. Volunteering; Whatʼs Up? Common Knowledge, the newsletter of the Friends of Streatham Common, is edited by Peter Newmark: tel. 020 8679 2908; email: [email protected] Yes, the Park Rangers have finally gone. The top panel has been stuck over the bottom panel on Please join us on Wednesday notice boards around the Common (apart from 7th December at the bottom of one that was missed out). And note that the “local the Common by the Christmas community” - that’s us - has been added as a tree, and later at our party. partner in managing the site. A number of issues related to these changes were discussed at the Friends’ public meeting on Community Safety, where the idea of setting up a Park Watch was floated (see page 2). And there are more changes to come as the reorganization of the Parks de- partment is still under negotiation. Meanwhile a first taste of the effects of cuts in the maintenance budget is already evident, with news, for example, that the memorial benches will no longer receive an annual ‘service’ but instead only be refreshed as and when it is deemed necessary, and that 7.00 pm - mince pies pruning of shrubs will no longer be carried out and mulled wine annually but only every three years. What the 7.30 pm - carol singing Friends will be fighting for in particular in coming 8.00 pm - Friendsʼ Christmas months is that the Rookery is given extra atten- party in the Pied Bull pub tion as well as Green Flag status in the run up to its centenary in 2013 (see page 3). 2 Community Safety ............. ...... What to Report to Whom A public meeting on this topic was organ- Lambeth Community Safety Division works ised by the Friends and held on 21 No- in partnership with Lambeth borough po- vember. Speaking at the meeting were lice and other internal and external agen- Nabil Mezoughi, the local Area Crime Re- cies to tackle and deal with crime and dis- duction Manager, Derek Prentice, Lam- order activities as well as anti-social be- beth’s Assistant Director, Culture and haviour issues. Communities Division, and Sergeant Mark Brindley who is in charge of the Streatham Each of Lambeth’s 21 wards has its own South Safer Neighbourhood Team. Police Safer Neighbourhood Team, made up of a Sergeant, two Officers and at least As a result of the meeting it was agreed two Police Community Support Officers. that there should be prominent notices on The Sergeant also has responsibility for the Common informing the public of how managing a Local Police Team made up of best to report problems. In outline, crimes at least six Officers that work across four and anti-social behaviour are matters for wards doing proactive work and respond- the police, whereas misuse of the Com- ing to usually less urgent calls. mon is a matter for the Council. Details of what to report to whom are in the following The local Streatham South Safer Neigh- article. One problem that emerged is that bourhood Police Team has its priorities set the police have no powers to enforce bye- by the Streatham South Safer Neighbour- laws on the Common and that with the hood Ward Panel, which is made up of demise of the Park Ranger service this members of the community (usually resi- leaves a gap, unless and until the police dents but sometimes also local business can be given the necessary powers, and owners), who are annually elected. At least always assuming they will consider en- four Ward Panel meetings a year are open forcement of bye-laws a priority. Mean- to the wider public, who can thereby influ- while it seems unlikely that much will be ence the crime and anti-social behaviour done about such problems as teenagers priorities that the police team will work on. using the playground or people camping or To find out the dates for these meetings, driving on the Common. please visit the following website: http://content.met.police.uk/Team/Lambeth An idea that was floated was that a Park /StreathamSouth Watch should be set up for the Common. This would be run along the lines of Currently’ one priority for the Streatham Neighbour Watch, with a group of local South Neighbourhood Police Team is to residents who agree to keep a look out for patrol the Common when schools finish to problems on the Common, reporting them reduce the risk of robberies against school through a coordinator to the appropriate children. authority. Visible ‘Park Watch’ signs would appear on the Common. Such a scheme The Common, itself, is managed by Lam- has just started elsewhere in Lambeth - in beth Council in partnership with the local Myatts Field Park, for example. community. We ask that park users help us keep them clean, green and safe for all to Sergant Brindley said that the police sur- use and enjoy. Please report any accidents geries are poorly attended and that if local or damage to Lambeth Parks. residents want any change in his team’s priorities, they need to make their voice If you witness an incident or are concerned heard at the surgeries, via petitions or about any crime / anti-social behaviour even through local newspapers ♦ issue in your ward or on the Common then 3 please contact the most appropriate of the Rookery Centenary following: Planning has started to celebrate the cen- To report any intimidating or threatening tenary of the Rookery in the summer of activities that scare you or cause distress 2013. There are a number of major aims. to you or to your neighbourhood, such as The first is that the Rookery grounds and verbal abuse, aggressive behaviour, noise gardens are brought up to a high standard, nuisance, criminal damage, street drinkers true to the original character of the gar- and so on (most incidents reported on this dens, and in keeping with the fact that the line are shared with your safer neighbour- garden is on English Heritage's Register of hood police team), contact the Lambeth Historic Parks and is a Grade 11* Garden Council Community Safety Anti-Social of Historic Importance. Preliminary talks Behaviour hotline on 020 7926 4000. have been held with Capel Manor College to see if a student project could be based To report any damage, vandalism, squat- on the Rookery Gardens. The second aim ting by travellers or any other issues relat- is to mark the ing to the upkeep of the Common, contact centenary with Lambeth’s Parks and Open Spaces on a major event, 020 7926 9000. possibly fo- cused on the To gain police advice or bring their atten- White Garden, tion to local problems that require long- which is in term solutions, contact the Safer Neigh- need of spruc- bourhood Team on 020 8721 2628. This ing up. Thirdly, number is not for reporting crime and inci- there is the dents because the team is not always on possibility of duty and no one picks up calls for the team applying for Green Flag status for the when they are not on duty. Rookery; this was on the cards until the council’s recent financial restraints took For all non-emergency incidents that re- hold, so now would require a major fund quire police attendance, such as coming raising effort, largely to create the man- home to find you’ve been burgled, intimi- agement plan that is a prerequisite for ap- dation by drinkers or general anti-social plying for Green Flag status ♦ behaviour, call the police on 101. For emergency calls that require immedi- ate police attendance – usually crimes in action, such as seeing a fight, having just been robbed or having lost your child - always call 999. Nabil Mezoughi, Area Crime Reduction Manager In response to a number of requests, we have started to send members timely email reminders of forthcoming ‘The Rookery’ around 1900. Thanks to events. If you have email, are not re- Tony Spain who sent us this photograph of his grandmother, a niece by marriage of ceiving our reminders but would like to, the owner. She is posed in front of the please let us know via: house, which was demolished in 1913. [email protected] 4 Streatham Common in Mitcham? to the pool. It was well attended and popu- Opposition is rapidly mounting to the lar. I remember the nativity crib displayed Boundary Commission for England’s pro- each Christmas by the pool. posals that would make the Common and the area to the south of it part of the Mit- Earlier, as a young child, I got to know cham parliamentary constituency. This is many trees in the wooded area and part of a wider proposal in which other thought there were ‘teddy bears’ there hav- parts of Streatham would end up in two ing their picnic! My grandmother alerted new constituencies, one called Clapham me to birdsong in the woods. My grandfa- Common and the other called Streatham ther often collected conkers for me. My and Tooting. older sister took me to the circus on the Common. At present we have our own MP to speak up for Streatham. Under the new propos- The place that impressed me most was als, no one MP could speak up for Streat- the Rookery.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Borough of Lambeth Election Results 1964-2010
    London Borough of Lambeth Election Results 1964-2010 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for Wales
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT THE MAIN GUILDHALL, HIGH STREET, KINGSTON UPON THAMES ON FRIDAY 28 OCTOBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/22 ______________________________ Time noted: 9.12 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the second day of the hearing here at Kingston. I am Howard Simmons, the Lead Assistant Commissioner responsible for chairing this session, and my colleague Tim Bowden is here from the Boundary Commission, who may want to say something about the administrative arrangements. MR BOWDEN: Thank you very much indeed, Howard, and good morning. We are scheduled to run until 5 pm today. Obviously, Howard can vary that at his discretion. We have quite a number of speakers. I think so far we have about 29 or 30 pre-booked and the first one is due to start in a couple of moments. Just a few housekeeping rules for the day. We are not expecting any fire alarms. If one does go off, it is out of this door and down the stairs and the meeting point is outside the front of the building; toilets out of the back door, please; ladies to the right, gents down the corridor to the left. Can you keep mobile phones on silent or switched off. If you want to take a call please go out of the back of the room.
    [Show full text]
  • UDP Policies to Be Superseded by the Core Strategy ______162
    Lambeth Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted January 2011 If you need any further information, please go to: www.lambeth.gov.uk/planning or email [email protected] Planning Aid for London can also provide advice: www.planningaidforlondon.org.uk Contents Section 1 – Introduction _______________________________________________ 4 The Local Development Framework____________________________________ 4 The Core Strategy _________________________________________________ 4 The Process and Assessment of Options _______________________________ 5 Lambeth’s Sustainable Community Strategy _____________________________ 6 National Planning Policy_____________________________________________ 7 The London Plan __________________________________________________ 7 Neighbouring Boroughs _____________________________________________ 9 Section 2 – Evidence Base and Issues __________________________________ 10 Evidence Base ___________________________________________________ 10 Spatial Portrait - Lambeth Today _____________________________________ 10 Summary of Spatial Planning Issues __________________________________ 18 A. Accommodating population growth _________________________________ 18 B. Achieving economic prosperity and opportunity for all___________________ 19 C. Tackling and adapting to climate change_____________________________ 21 D. Providing essential infrastructure___________________________________ 23 E. Promoting community cohesion and safe, liveable neighbourhoods ________ 26 F. Creating and maintaining attractive,
    [Show full text]
  • Streatham Society Meetings & Events
    STREATHAM SOCIETY NEWS Published quarterly No. 210 Autumn 2012 Railings at Streatham Common Station Bridge (see article p.3) (photo Brian Palmer) STREATHAM SOCIETY MEETINGS & EVENTS CHRISTMAS THEMES THE BRIXTON WINDMILL - Members’ Evening A DREAM COME TRUE Monday 3rd December 8pm Richard Santhiri (Please read note p29) Monday 4th March 8pm RECENT LOCAL HISTORY DIS- THE WORK OF THE STREATHAM COVERIES Various speakers YOUTH & COMMUNITY TRUST Monday 7th January 8pm Clive Winters Monday 18th March 8pm THE LIFE OF Lt HENRY BOWERS, ANTARCTIC EXPLORER STENTON COVINGTON - THE Anne Strathie ROOKERY & NORWOOD GROVE Monday 21st January 8pm Daphne Marchant Monday 1st April 8pm THE HISTORY & RESTORATION OF PECKHAM RYE STATION SCHOOLS IN THE 21st CENTURY Benedict O’Looney Jillian Smith Monday 4th February 8pm Monday 15th April 8pm LONDON’S INLAND WATERWAYS All meetings at “Woodlawns” 16 Roger Squires Leigham Court Road SW16 Monday 18th February 8pm unless otherwise stated CONTENTS Streatham News p 3 Streatham Ice Rink Streatham & Streatham Common A Plague on Streatham Stations Donald McGill Streatham Library The Leigham Court Hotel The South London Press Streatham Society Reports p 25 Other Local News Miscellany p 30 Local History Matters p 8 Publications p 33 John James Webster Brian’s Picture Quiz p 35 Charles Dickens & Streatham MoreDates For your Diary p 35 The Broster Family The Streatham Society welcomes articles of interest to our members, but the editor reserves the right to edit these. Opinions expressed may not be those of the Society. Articles and photographs may be reproduced only with the editor’s permission. 2 Streatham Society 210 STREATHAM NEWS & PLANNING MATTERS STREATHAM COMMON STATION – TRAFFIC CHAOS? BJB As a result of the Network Rail work on extending the existing platforms 1 and 2 at Streatham Common Station, it is necessary to replace the road bridge over the railway from Greyhound Lane to Streatham Vale.
    [Show full text]
  • Streatham South Area Onsultation – 4 Schemes – 8 Sep to 4 Oct 2015 July 2016 Response to Consultation for Streatham South Area March 2016 (V3 14.03.16)
    QuietwayQuietway 5 –5 Waterloo – Waterloo to Croydon to Croydon ConsultationConsultation London Borough of Lambeth On behalf of London Borough of Lambeth Response to consultation for Streatham south area onsultation – 4 schemes – 8 Sep to 4 Oct 2015 July 2016 Response to consultation for Streatham south area March 2016 (v3 14.03.16) Quietway Q5 | London Borough of Lambeth – Streatham South 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………..2 1 BACKGROUND…………………………………………………………………………..5 1.1 About Quietways 5 1.2 London Borough of Lambeth, TfL, and Sustrans 5 1.3 Schemes in the first series of consultations 5 2 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………….7 2.1 Purpose of the four schemes 7 2.2 Description of the scheme proposals 7 2.3 Q5 Route map 8 3 THE CONSULTATION…………………………………………………………………..9 3.1 Who Lambeth Council consulted 9 3.2 Consultation material, distribution and publicity 10 3.3 Meetings 10 3.4 Consultation questions 10 4 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT……………………………………………………..11 5 OVERVIEW OF CONSULTATION RESPONSES………………………………….. 12 5.1 Greyhound/Ellison/Estreham - responses received public and stakeholders 12 5.2 Greyhound/Ellison/Estreham - analysis of consultation responses 13 5.3 Greyhound/Ellison/Estreham - summary of stakeholder responses 14 From 5.4 to 5.12 schemes two to four replicate the above three sections 14 5.13 Comments received about the Quietway 5 cycle route 20 5.14 Comments received about the quality of the consultations 20 5.15 How did you hear about this consultation? 21 6 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS……………………………………………….…22
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL DOCUMENT.Indd
    London Councils' Directory 2007 A GUIDE TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN LONDON London Councils (formerly the Association of London Government) 591/2 Southwark Street, London SE1 0AL Tel: 020 7934 9999 Fax: 020 7934 9991 ISBN: 1 85494 121 6 Price £35.00* September 2006 *£17.50 to London boroughs & voluntary organisations 1 2 CONTENTS About us 7 Greater London Employment Forum 11 Grants Committee 12 Leaders’ Committee 10 Staff 14 Transport and Environment Committee 13 London Government A brief history 17 Recent changes to London’s government 17 The London boroughs 19 Borough election results 2006 21 Town Hall addresses 24 About the data 27 The London boroughs Barking and Dagenham 28 Barnet 33 Bexley 40 Brent 46 Bromley 52 Camden 58 Croydon 63 Ealing 69 Enfield 76 Greenwich 82 Hackney 89 Hammersmith and Fulham 95 Haringey 100 Harrow 107 Havering 113 Hillingdon 119 Hounslow 125 Islington 132 Kensington and Chelsea 137 Kingston upon Thames 143 Lambeth 150 Lewisham 156 Merton 161 Newham 166 3 CONTENTS The London boroughs (continued) Redbridge 173 Richmond upon Thames 181 Southwark 188 Sutton 195 Tower Hamlets 201 Waltham Forest 208 Wandsworth 214 Westminster 222 City of London 228 Greater London Authority 236 London Development Agency 239 London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority 241 Metropolitan Police Authority 244 Transport for London 246 London MPs 247 London MEPs 249 Government departments 250 London local government professional associations 253 Health care in London 256 London Learning and Skills Councils 262 Other useful addresses 265 Media
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Streatham Common South
    ADDRESS: 12 Streatham Common South, London, SW16 3BT Application Number: 15/02317/FUL Case Officer: Rob McNicol Ward: Streatham South Date Received: 21.04.2015 Proposal: Demolition of existing garages and construction of two dwellinghouses at ground and basement level including parking spaces Drawing numbers: Site location plan, ref STR_010; Existing ground floor plan, ref STR_002; Existing elevations, ref STR_003; Proposed upper ground floor plan, ref STR_101; Proposed lower ground floor plan, ref STR_102; Proposed elevations (front, rear and part section G-G), ref STR_103; Proposed side elevations, ref STR_104; Proposed roof plan, ref STR_105; Proposed section (A-A and B-B), ref STR_106; Proposed section (C-C and D-D), ref STR_107; Proposed section (E-E and F-F), ref STR_108; Proposed site plan, ref STR_110; Proposed site boundary conditions, ref STR_111; Proposed section through Baldry Gardens, ref STR_112; Lifetime home compliance plan (upper ground floor), ref STR_122; Lifetime home compliance plan (lower ground floor), ref STR_123; Ground floor contextual plan, ref STR_124; Proposed contextual elevations, ref STR_125; Proposed access (parking layout and waste collection), ref STR_126; Proposed access (fire and rescue service vehicle access), ref STR_127; Proposed access (safety provisions and visibility display, ref STR_128; Proposed access (car manoeuvre movements to parking bays), ref STR_129; Site boundary plan for 12 Streatham Common South, ref STR_PL_140. Documents: Planning Statement by NaganJohnson Architects, received 29/04/2015; Perspective drawing (view from driveway), received 29/04/2015; Bird’s eye perspective drawing, received 10/06/2015 (corrected drawing); Indicative sketch for treatment of entrance to house 2, dated 18/06/2015; Indicative drainage layout plan, dwg no.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Women Councillors Taskforce Research Report
    Evaluation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Women Councillors Taskforce Research report Evaluation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Women Councillors Taskforce Research report May 2011/ Job No. 584/ GEO Research Report No. 2010/10 ISBN: 978-1-84987-464-9 Prepared for: Government Equalities Office Creative Research Ltd Phone: 020 8567 6974 Email: [email protected] 43 Broadway, London W13 9BP Fax: 020 8567 6979 www.creativeresearch.co.uk Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Research Method 2 1.3 Key Findings 3 1.4 Conclusions 5 2 INTRODUCTION 9 2.1 Background of the Taskforce 9 2.2 The Programme of Work 9 3 METHODS 12 3.1 Aims and Objectives 12 3.2 Research Method 12 3.3 Limitations of the Research 13 3.4 Interpreting the Findings 15 3.5 Use of Quotations 16 3.6 Structure of the Report 16 4 KEY FINDINGS 17 4.1 Introduction 18 4.2 Outcomes 19 4.3 Strengths and Challenges 21 4.4 Value and Sustainability 25 4.5 Progress and Development of Participants 35 5 OUTREACH EVENTS 37 5.1 Introduction 37 5.2 Profile of Event Attendees 38 Evaluation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Women Councillors Taskforce: Research report 5.3 Motivations for Attending an Event 39 5.4 Views on the Events 41 5.5 Impact of the Events 42 5.6 Perceptions of Support Required 46 5.7 What Happened Next? 47 5.8 Media Coverage of the Events 49 5.9 Learning Points 50 6 SHADOWING AND MENTORING PROGRAMME 55 6.1 Introduction 55 6.2 Participation in the Scheme 57 6.3 Impacts 61 6.4 The Councillors‟ View 70 6.5 Learning Points 74 7 COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP COURSE 78 7.1 Introduction 78 7.2 The Course 78 7.3 How Helpful the Course has been 79 7.4 Impacts 82 7.5 Learning Points 85 APPENDICES 86 A.1 Research Method and Response Rates 86 A.2 Tracking Survey 91 Evaluation of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Women Councillors Taskforce: Research report Box 1: Aims and objectives of the Taskforce ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals to Extend Bus Lanes in Streatham High Road Northbound Between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road Consultation Report November 2017
    Proposals to extend bus lanes in Streatham High Road northbound between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road Consultation Report November 2017 1 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 3 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Detailed description ........................................................................................ 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 7 2.3 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 8 2.5 What we asked ............................................................................................... 8 2.6 Methods of responding ................................................................................... 8 2.7 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................... 8 2.8 Equalities assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Close of Nominations filling in Everything on the Form You Will Need to Put It in the Envelope
    St George’s Healthcare You received a return envelope with this nomination form. When you have finished Close of nominations filling in everything on the form you will need to put it in the envelope. You do not need to put a stamp on the envelope. Simply put it in a post box. We must receive your completed form by 5pm on Wednesday 9 October 2013. It is very important that we get your form by this time because if we don’t, people will not be able to vote for you. When we receive your form we will write to you to let you know. If you do not hear from anyone after three days, you will need to telephone UK-Engage on 0345 209 3770 to find out what has happened. If you mislay your return envelope please send your form, in a stamped envelope, to: Returning Officer, UK-Engage, Image House, 10 Acorn Business Park, Heaton Lane, Stockport SK4 1AS Thank you for filling in this form and good luck in the election! St George’s Healthcare St George’s Healthcare Put your name forward to be a Foundation Trust Governor Nomination Form My details Please use BLOCK CAPITALS First name(s): Surname: Name as you want it to appear on the ballot paper: Title (e.g. Mr, Ms, Dr): Address: Postcode: Date of Birth: Email Address: Twitter Handle@ Telephone Number: Preferred Contact Method: Telephone: Email: Post: Ethnic Group I would describe myself as: Prefer not to say WHITE BLACK/BLACK BRITISH ASIAN/ASIAN BRITISH MIXED British Greek Cypriot Caribbean Indian White & Black Caribbean Irish Turkish African Pakistani White & Black African Irish Traveller Kurdish Other Bangladeshi White & Asian Gypsy Other Chinese Other Other We are asking for your address, telephone number and email address in case we need to contact you.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Result of Poll
    London Borough of Lambeth Election of 3 Ward Councillors Bishops Ward Declaration of Result of Poll Date of Election: 22 May 2014 I, Derrick Anderson, Returning Officer, hereby give notice that the number of votes for each Candidate at the election of 3 Councillors for Bishops Ward are as follows: Number of Votes. Candidate name Description of candidate If Elected the Word 'ELECTED' appears against the number of votes BRAITHWAITE Diana Elma Liberal Democrats 949 BRIGHTBART Sam The Green Party 304 CRAIG Kevin Labour Party Candidate 1061 ELECTED CROFT Clive Murray The Green Party 295 FROST David Alan Conservative Party Candidate 292 GORISSEN Bart The Green Party 272 HANNEY Matthew Thomas Liberal Democrats 777 HARRISON Edward Jon Conservative Party 291 HAYES Andrew Robert UK Independence Party (UKIP) 248 KIND Ben Labour Party Candidate 976 ELECTED MORRIS El Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 63 MOSLEY Jennie Labour Party Candidate 1106 ELECTED ROTHERHAM Lee Stuart Conservative Party Candidate 284 TRUESDALE Peter Jonathan Liberal Democrats 939 The Number of rejected ballot papers was as follows: Number A - Want of an official mark 0 B - Voting for more than three candidates 0 C – Writing or mark by which voter could be identified 0 D – Unmarked or void for uncertainty 0 E – Rejected in part 0 Total 0 Electorate = 7,586 Total votes received = 2,800 Turnout = 36.91 % And I declare that 1. Jennie Mosley 2. Kevin Craig 3. Ben Kind are duly elected as Members for Bishops Ward. Derrick Anderson, Returning Officer. Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Lambeth Town Hall, Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1RW London Borough of Lambeth Election of 3 Ward Councillors Brixton Hill Ward Declaration of Result of Poll Date of Election: 22 May 2014 I, Derrick Anderson, Returning Officer, hereby give notice that the number of votes for each Candidate at the election of 3 Councillors for Brixton Hill Ward are as follows: Number of Votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Election Results 2006
    Local Election Results 4th May 2006 Andrew Teale Version 0.02 March 16, 2008 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2006 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2008. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file (in several formats) is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations5 I London Boroughs7 1 North London8 1.1 Barking and Dagenham.......................8 1.2 Barnet................................... 11 1.3 Brent.................................. 14 1.4 Camden................................ 17 1.5 Ealing.................................. 20 1.6 Enfield................................. 24 1.7 Hackney................................ 27 1.8 Hammersmith and Fulham...................... 31 1.9 Haringey................................ 34 1.10 Harrow................................. 37 1.11 Havering................................ 40 1.12 Hillingdon............................... 45 1.13 Hounslow............................... 49 1.14 Islington................................. 51 1.15 Kensington and Chelsea....................... 55 1.16 Newham................................ 58 1.17 Redbridge................................ 61 1.18 Tower Hamlets............................ 64 1.19 Waltham Forest............................ 68 1.20 Westminster.............................. 72 2 South London 75 2.1 Bexley.................................
    [Show full text]