Declaration of Result of Poll
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee
PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday 25 May 2021 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: Committee Room (B6) - Lambeth Town Hall, Brixton, London, SW2 1RW* *In line with legislation and continuing Covid-19 precautions, Committee Members will attend the meeting in person at Lambeth Town Hall. Officers, visiting Ward Members and members of the public are invited to attend virtually. Further instructions about joining the meeting, are provided overleaf. Copies of agendas, reports, minutes and other attachments for the Council’s meetings are available on the Lambeth website. www.lambeth.gov.uk/moderngov Members of the Committee Councillor Scarlett O'Hara (Vice-Chair), Councillor Malcolm Clark, Councillor Jessica Leigh, Councillor Mohammed Seedat, Councillor Iain Simpson, Councillor Joanne Simpson (Chair) and Councillor Becca Thackray Substitute Members Councillor Liz Atkins, Councillor Jennifer Brathwaite, Councillor Marcia Cameron, Councillor Rezina Chowdhury, Councillor Paul Gadsby, Councillor Nigel Haselden, Councillor Maria Kay, Councillor Marianna Masters, Councillor Timothy Windle and Councillor Sonia Winifred Further Information If you require any further information or have any queries please contact: Farah Hussain, Telephone: 020 7926 4201; Email: [email protected] Published on: Thursday 13 May 2021 Queries on reports Please contact report authors prior to the meeting if you have questions on the reports or wish to inspect the background documents used. The contact details of the report author are shown on the front page of each report. @LBLdemocracy on Twitter http://twitter.com/LBLdemocracy or use #Lambeth How to access the meeting In line with legislation, Committee members will attend the meeting in person at Lambeth Town Hall. Due to public health guidance covering health, hygiene and social distancing, officers, visiting Ward Members and members of the public are invited to attend virtually. -
London Borough of Lambeth Election Results 1964-2010
London Borough of Lambeth Election Results 1964-2010 Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher The Elections Centre Plymouth University The information contained in this report has been obtained from a number of sources. Election results from the immediate post-reorganisation period were painstakingly collected by Alan Willis largely, although not exclusively, from local newspaper reports. From the mid- 1980s onwards the results have been obtained from each local authority by the Elections Centre. The data are stored in a database designed by Lawrence Ware and maintained by Brian Cheal and others at Plymouth University. Despite our best efforts some information remains elusive whilst we accept that some errors are likely to remain. Notice of any mistakes should be sent to [email protected]. The results sequence can be kept up to date by purchasing copies of the annual Local Elections Handbook, details of which can be obtained by contacting the email address above. Front cover: the graph shows the distribution of percentage vote shares over the period covered by the results. The lines reflect the colours traditionally used by the three main parties. The grey line is the share obtained by Independent candidates while the purple line groups together the vote shares for all other parties. Rear cover: the top graph shows the percentage share of council seats for the main parties as well as those won by Independents and other parties. The lines take account of any by- election changes (but not those resulting from elected councillors switching party allegiance) as well as the transfers of seats during the main round of local election. -
Streatham Hill East M CPZ N
LONDON BOROUGH OF LAMBETH INTRODUCTION OF A NEW CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE TO BE KNOWN AS THE STREATHAM HILL EAST “M” CONTROLLED PARKING ZONE AND EXTENSION OF THE BRIXTON HILL “F” AND THE TULSE HILL “H” CONTROLLED PARKING ZONES INTRODUCTION OF “AT ANY TIME” WAITING RESTRICTIONS (DOUBLE YELLOW LINES) AND AN AMBULANCE PARKING PLACE IN ROADS IN THE STREATHAM HILL AND TULSE HILL AREAS [Note: This notice is about the introduction of a new controlled parking zone (CPZ) in streets to the east of Streatham Hill to be known as the Streatham Hill East “M” CPZ, the extension of the Brixton Hill “F” CPZ to include a part of Roupell Road and the extension of the Tulse Hill “H” CPZ to include Probyn Road. On-street parking places and single and double yellow line waiting restrictions will be introduced in the new and extended CPZs, double yellow line waiting restrictions will also be introduced in various roads in the Streatham Hill and Tulse Hill areas that are not to be included in any CPZ and an ambulance parking place will be introduced in Palace Road.] 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the London Borough of Lambeth on 30th September 2020 made the Lambeth (Streatham Hill East “M”) (Parking Places) (No. 1) Order 2020, the Lambeth (Brixton Hill “F”) (Parking Places) (No. 2) Order 2020, the Lambeth (Tulse Hill) (Parking Places) (No. 3) Order 2020, the Lambeth (Free Parking Places) (Disabled Persons) (No. 3) Order 2020, the Lambeth (Free Parking Places) (Limited Time) (No. 3) Order 2020, the Lambeth (Free Parking Places) (Motor Cycles) (No. -
First Agenda Autumn Conference 2020
First Agenda Autumn Conference 2020 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Section A .................................................................................................................................... 5 A1 Amendments to Standing Orders for the Conduct of Conference to enable an online and telephone Extraordinary Conference to be held in Autumn 2020 ................................. 5 A2 Enabling Motion for an Extraordinary Autumn Conference 2020 to be held online ....... 7 Section B .................................................................................................................................... 8 B1 Food and Agriculture Voting Paper .................................................................................. 8 Section C................................................................................................................................... 15 C1 Adopt the Principle of Rationing to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Arising from Travel, Amending the Climate Emergency and the Transport Chapters of PSS .................. 15 C2 The 2019 General Election Manifesto and Climate Change Mitigation ......................... 17 C3 Animal Rights: Fireworks; limit use and quiet ................................................................ 19 C4 Updating the philosophical basis to reflect doughnut economics ................................. 20 C5 Car and vans to go zero carbon by -
FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020
FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020 9 1 CONTENTS Table of Contents 2 Section A (Enabling Motions) 10 Enabling Motions A01 Standing Orders Committee (SOC) Report 10 Enabling Motions A02 Amendments to Standing Orders for the Conduct of Conference 11 to enable an online and telephone Extraordinary Conference to be held in Autumn 2020 Enabling Motions A03 Enabling Motion for an Extraordinary Autumn Conference 2020 12 to be held online Section A – Main Agenda 14 A1 Standing Orders Committee Report 14 A2 Green Party Executive Report 37 A3 Treasurers Report 46 A4 Green Party Regional Council Report 47 A5 Dispute Resolution Committee Report 50 A6 Policy Development Committee Report 54 A7 Complaint Managers Report 57 A8 Campaigns Committee Report 58 A9 Conferences Committee Report 58 A10 Equality and Diversity Committee Report 58 A11 Green World Editorial Board Report 58 A12 Framework Development Group report 58 A13 Climate Emergency Policy Working Group Report 58 Section B 60 B1 Food and Agriculture Voting Paper 60 Amendment 2a 60 Amendment 1a 61 Amendment 2b 61 Amendment 1b 61 Amendment 1c 62 Amendment 1d 62 Amendment 2c 64 2 3 Section C 65 C1 Deforestation (Fast Tracked) 65 C2 Car and vans to go zero carbon by 2030 65 C3 Ban on advertising of high-carbon goods and services 65 C4 The 2019 General Election Manifesto and Climate Change Mitigation 66 Amendment 1 67 Amendment 2 67 C5 Adopt the Principle of Rationing to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Arising from Travel, 67 Amending the Climate Emergency and the Transport Chapters of PSS C6 Updating the philosophical basis to reflect doughnut economics 68 Amendment 1 69 C7 Self Declaration of Gender 69 C8 Animal Rights: Fireworks; limit use and quiet 70 C9 Access to Fertility Treatment 70 Section D 71 D1 Winning over workers is crucial to fighting climate change. -
Boundary Commission for Wales
BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT THE MAIN GUILDHALL, HIGH STREET, KINGSTON UPON THAMES ON FRIDAY 28 OCTOBER 2016 DAY TWO Before: Mr Howard Simmons, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ______________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 0203 585 4721/22 ______________________________ Time noted: 9.12 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the second day of the hearing here at Kingston. I am Howard Simmons, the Lead Assistant Commissioner responsible for chairing this session, and my colleague Tim Bowden is here from the Boundary Commission, who may want to say something about the administrative arrangements. MR BOWDEN: Thank you very much indeed, Howard, and good morning. We are scheduled to run until 5 pm today. Obviously, Howard can vary that at his discretion. We have quite a number of speakers. I think so far we have about 29 or 30 pre-booked and the first one is due to start in a couple of moments. Just a few housekeeping rules for the day. We are not expecting any fire alarms. If one does go off, it is out of this door and down the stairs and the meeting point is outside the front of the building; toilets out of the back door, please; ladies to the right, gents down the corridor to the left. Can you keep mobile phones on silent or switched off. If you want to take a call please go out of the back of the room. -
Lambeth Techaid to Get Laptops to Children in Need
Bell Ribeiro-Addy MP Monthly Report, December 2020 Why I opposed the Tories' sham Brexit vote Thank you to all those of you who shared your thoughts with me on the Brexit Deal. Whilst it was clear that people in Streatham were worried about the possibility of a No Deal, it was also clear that the prospect of a hard Brexit was equally repellent. In the event, I cast my vote against in the division lobby. Nobody wanted a deal which fails to protect the NHS, workers’ rights, migrants, environmental standards and security. But the problem with this rotten Brexit deal goes much deeper. It is bad enough that MPs were given just five hours to debate a 1,200 page document that will determine the future of generations to come. What is even worse is that Parliament didn’t actually get a meaningful vote on the deal itself, just on whether or not to give the Government a wide-ranging set of powers to implement it. To be clear, the deal would have been implemented however Parliament voted on it. When the Government stood up and declaimed that voting against their deal was voting for No Deal, they were straightforwardly lying about this. We know that for the elite who steered the project from start to finish, Brexit was never about democracy. Its predictable ending was a far cry from the arguments about parliamentary sovereignty and accountability used by those who argued for it in the first place. Left with a deal which will inflict damage on jobs and the economy, drive down living standards and erode workers’ rights in the name of competition, our priority must now be opposing the inevitable race to the bottom that will follow. -
Masks Must Remain Mandatory to Keep Public Safe, Says Green Party
Greens express profound disappointment over Labour Party failure to support fair voting system 27 September 2021 The Green Party has criticised the Labour leadership for failing to ensure the party backed a vote to support proportional representation at its conference today [Monday 27 September]. [1] Labour conference defeated the motion after it was sent to a card vote. This came after 150 Constituency Labour Parties submitted motions on the topic and more than 83% of members previously said they support the idea. [2] Zack Polanski, Green Party spokesperson on Democracy and Citizen Engagement, said: “This is a really disappointing decision by the Labour Party which shows a real lack of leadership and vision from the top of the party. “Labour members overwhelmingly support electoral reform, yet Keir Starmer has done next to nothing to ensure that his party’s delegates voted through a motion which could have revolutionised British politics and put an end to the Tory stranglehold on our failed democratic system. “In the conference hall, speaker after speaker argued passionately for Labour to adopt proportional representation in its next manifesto, yet it still did not pass. Without proportional representation and electoral cooperation Labour has an impossible mountain to climb and the country faces another five years of chaos with the Conservatives. “It is clear that British voters want to move on from the failure and division caused by the two-party system, and so it is extremely worrying to see Labour fail to grasp the need for a more cooperative and collaborative form of politics which will benefit everyone. -
Streatham Matters A3.Indd 2-3 07/11/2016 19:06 Oursecurity
Our aim: Local services, local opportunities, a council for everyone Streatham Labour pay Fly-tipping Common: themselves across Longer, noisier more, then hike Streatham ‘out music events council tax of control’ >> Page 2 >> Page 3 >> Page 4 ‘Free’ newspapers funded by the council... criticised LAMBETH COUNCIL FUNDING Autumn/Winter Wavertree and Wyatt Park roads ‘FAKE NEWSPAPERS’ SCAM 2016-17 in Streatham... no consultation TREATHAM ATTERS Lambeth Council has been criticised by S M residents’ groups for spending huge amounts The newsletter from local Conservatives for wards across Streatham. of money on magazines, ‘free’ newspapers Produced at no cost to the taxpayer, paid for by voluntary contributions COUNCIL CONSULTATIONS ‘INHUMAN’ and email newsletters, designed to present Conservative Group vows to halt the demolition of people’s homes for the Labour administration in a positive light. proper community-based consultations The Labour council has refused to stop funding fake newspapers such as ‘Brixton The Labour council is using Review of the council’s failure to Labour councillors of failing to Blog’, ‘Lambeth Talk’, and ‘Living Local’. FIRE RISK IN LAMBETH its own failure to do repairs consult properly and consider listen to residents. The council’s expensive spin department as its justification to demolish renovation. In Streatham, Wavertree and selects data to put into its newspapers from lowrise estates, and end The Conservative government Wyatt Park Road residents its Survey of Tenants and Residents (‘STAR’), residents’ right-to-buy. COUNCIL FLATS ‘CRITICAL’ recently reversed a similar have also had 3-storey flats to cover up Labour’s poor management In May the Conservative Group decision by Southwark Council built next to their homes with of housing. -
General Election Candidate Details
General Election Candidate Details Barking Margaret Hodge, Lab, [email protected] @margarethodge (the sitting MP) Tamkeen Akhterrasul Shaikh, Con, [email protected] @tamkeenshaikh Ann Haigh, Lib Dem, [email protected] Shannon Butterfield, Green, [email protected] Karen Batley, Brexit Party, [email protected] @BatleyKaren Bermondsey and Old Southwark Neil Coyle, Labour, [email protected] @coyleneil Andrew Baker, Con, [email protected] @agsbaker235 Humaira Ali, Liberal Democrat, [email protected] @cllrhumaira Alex Matthews, Brexit Party, [email protected] @apmmatthews Bethnal Green & Bow Rushanara Ali, Lab, [email protected] @rushanaraali (the sitting MP) Nick Stovold, Con, [email protected] @nick_stovold Josh Babarinde, Lib Dem, [email protected] Shahrar Ali, Green, [email protected] @ShahrarAli David Axe, Brexit Party, [email protected] @DavidAxePPC Camberwell & Peckham Harriet Harman, Lab, [email protected] @HarrietHarman (the sitting MP) Peter Quentin, Con, [email protected] Julia Ogiehor, Lib Dem, [email protected] @juliaogiehor Claire Sheppard, Green, [email protected] @ShinyShep Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan-Smith, Con, [email protected] (the sitting MP) Lab, Faiza Shaeen, [email protected] @faizashaheen Geoffrey Seef, Lib Dem, [email protected] @GSeeff Dagenham & Rainham Jon Cruddas, Lab, [email protected] -
Supreme Court, Lawyer Letter
Lord Reed President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Parliament Square London SW1P 3BD [email protected] Cc Rt Hon Alok Sharma MP, President COP26 Rt Hon Michael Ellis QC MP, Attorney General Mr. Tim Crosland, Director, Plan B.Earth Re. Humanity’s Lifeline: the Paris Agreement Temperature Limit March 30, 2021 Dear Lord Reed: We write concerning the Supreme Court’s decision last December, which ruled that the Government’s policy in support of Heathrow expansion was lawful, despite the Government’s failure to take into account the Paris Agreement’s agreed temperature limits which constitute a key part of its architecture.1 There was uncontested evidence before the Court that: ● The expansion of Heathrow Airport would lead to around 40,000,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions from UK aviation by 20502; ● That in order to meet the Paris Temperature Limit (ie 1.5˚C and “well below” 2˚C), carbon dioxide emissions would need to be “net zero” before 20503; and that ● Breaching the Temperature Limits prescribed in the goals of the Paris Agreement would have dire implications for humanity, in particular for the younger generation and the Global South. The Government did not explain how the expansion of Heathrow Airport could be reconciled with the goals agreed in Paris by every country in the world. To the contrary, it argued that the Paris Agreement was “not relevant”4. Chris Grayling MP, the Transport Minister at the time, relied instead on the historic 2˚C temperature limit, rejected by governments (including the UK 1 See R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) (Respondents) v Heathrow Airport Ltd (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 52 2 See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/878705 /uk-aviation-forecasts-2017.pdf, p.107, Table 36 3 See Court of Appeal judgement, para. -
UDP Policies to Be Superseded by the Core Strategy ______162
Lambeth Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted January 2011 If you need any further information, please go to: www.lambeth.gov.uk/planning or email [email protected] Planning Aid for London can also provide advice: www.planningaidforlondon.org.uk Contents Section 1 – Introduction _______________________________________________ 4 The Local Development Framework____________________________________ 4 The Core Strategy _________________________________________________ 4 The Process and Assessment of Options _______________________________ 5 Lambeth’s Sustainable Community Strategy _____________________________ 6 National Planning Policy_____________________________________________ 7 The London Plan __________________________________________________ 7 Neighbouring Boroughs _____________________________________________ 9 Section 2 – Evidence Base and Issues __________________________________ 10 Evidence Base ___________________________________________________ 10 Spatial Portrait - Lambeth Today _____________________________________ 10 Summary of Spatial Planning Issues __________________________________ 18 A. Accommodating population growth _________________________________ 18 B. Achieving economic prosperity and opportunity for all___________________ 19 C. Tackling and adapting to climate change_____________________________ 21 D. Providing essential infrastructure___________________________________ 23 E. Promoting community cohesion and safe, liveable neighbourhoods ________ 26 F. Creating and maintaining attractive,