DOCSLIB.ORG

Streatham High Road Consultation Report 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Streatham High Road Consultation Report 2018 Proposed changes to parking and loadingProposed bays changes northbound to parking on Streatham and Highloading Road bays between northbound Becmead on StreathamAvenue andRoad Drewstead between BecmeadRoad Avenue Consultationand Drewstead Report Road FebruaryConsultation 2018 Report February 2018 1 Contents Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 3 1. About the proposals ............................................................................................ 5 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Detailed description ........................................................................................ 5 2. About the consultation ........................................................................................ 7 2.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Potential outcomes ......................................................................................... 7 2.3 Who we consulted .......................................................................................... 7 2.4 Dates and duration ......................................................................................... 8 2.5 What we asked ............................................................................................... 8 2.6 Methods of responding ................................................................................... 8 2.7 Consultation materials and publicity ............................................................... 8 2.8 Equalities assessment of the consultation ..................................................... 9 2.9 Analysis of consultation responses ................................................................ 9 3. About the respondents ...................................................................................... 10 3.1 Number of respondents ................................................................................ 10 3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation ........................................... 10 3.3 Methods of responding ................................................................................. 10 3.4 Postcodes of respondents ............................................................................ 11 3.5 Interest in the scheme .................................................................................. 11 4. Summary of consultation responses ................................................................. 12 4.1 Summary of responses ................................................................................ 12 4.2 Summary of stakeholder responses ............................................................. 13 4.4 Comments on the consultation ..................................................................... 15 5. Next steps ......................................................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments ............................................................. 17 Appendix B: Consultation drawing ............................................................................ 19 Appendix C: Survey questions .................................................................................. 20 Appendix D: Notification letter and emails ................................................................. 22 Appendix E: List of stakeholders ............................................................................... 27 2 Executive summary Between 1 February and 14 March 2017, we consulted on proposals to extend northbound bus lanes in Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road as part of our London-wide Bus Priority Programme. For the consultation report and our responses to the issues raised during consultation, visit consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streatham-high-road. Between 15 November and 13 December 2017 we consulted on updated proposals to change the parking and loading restrictions on three bays on Streatham High Road, between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road. The proposals consulted on included: • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 148 Streatham High Road (Bay 1) • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 60 Streatham High Road (Bay 2) and reducing the length of the bay • Changing the operation of an existing parking bay outside 34-36 Streatham High Road (Bay 3) and reducing the length of the bay These proposals followed a review of the previous consultation responses and surveys of the usage of these parking and loading bay surveys. They were proposed in order to reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses, whilst still providing loading for local businesses and visitors. We received 33 responses to the consultation, with 12 respondents (36%) opposed to one or more aspects of the proposals and nine respondents (27%) supportive of the proposals in general. In addition, 12 respondents (36%) made no comments in support or opposition of the proposals, or commented on other aspects of traffic in the general area. The main themes raised during the consultation are highlighted below, with a fuller summary of the results in Chapter Four and detailed analysis of comments in Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments Summary of most frequently made comments • General support for the proposals to remove stationary vehicles from bus lanes • Opposition from local businesses to the proposed change of Bay 3 from parking to disabled parking and loading only 3 • Concern from local businesses that the change to hours of Bay 2 from 10:00- 16:00 to 10:00-13:00 Monday to Saturday would negatively impact their delivery schedules • Concern from local businesses to the reduced length of Bay 2 would negatively impact on their ability to receive deliveries • General opposition to a loss of parking in the area and requests for the local road to have business or resident permits introduced • Calls from local residents and businesses for more to be done to enforce parking and loading bays hour of operation in the area Next steps Following careful consideration of the consultation responses from local businesses we are no longer proposing to amend the hours of operation of bays 2 and 3. The hours of operation of bay 1 will still be amended, but following responses from local businesses will be changed to 10:00-16:00 Monday to Saturday instead of 10:00- 13:00 as originally proposed. The hours of operation for loading for all bays will therefore be 10:00-16:00. We will proceed with the proposals to reduce the length of Bays 2 and 3. We plan to implement the changes to the bus lanes and the loading and parking bay signage in spring 2018. 4 1. About the proposals 1.1 Introduction The A23 in Streatham is an important bus corridor, with around 90 buses per hour in the peak period, carrying tens of thousands of people daily. Our proposed changes to parking, loading and disabled parking bays on Streatham High Road would reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses while providing loading for local businesses and visitors. The proposals would complement the bus lane extension we consulted on in early 2017. We will continue to monitor and review the A23 through Streatham to identify opportunities to improve conditions for walking, cycling and bus travel. 1.2 Detailed description You can view detailed description of the proposals, including an annotated diagram, at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd/. 1.2.1 Diagram of proposed changes The consultation diagram is reproduced in Appendix B. 1.2.2 Summary of proposed changes The following text was used to describe the proposals: We would like your feedback on proposed changes to parking and loading bays northbound on Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road. The proposed changes differ from the proposals we consulted on in February 2017, and follow a review of consultation responses and further parking and loading surveys. The A23 Streatham High Road is an important bus corridor, with around 90 buses per hour in the peak period, carrying tens of thousands of people daily. We are proposing changes to loading and disabled parking to reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses while still providing parking and loading for local businesses and visitors. What we are proposing: 5 • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 148 Streatham High Road We are no longer proposing to inset the bay into the footway, as was consulted on previously. Instead, we are proposing a change of hours of operation for the bay to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm’ • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 60 Streatham High Road We are proposing a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm’ and to reduce the length of the bay from 42.6 metres to 30 metres, to better match the current demand on the bay • Changing the hours of operation of an existing parking bay outside 34-36 Streatham High Road We are proposing to change a parking bay to a loading and disabled parking only bay, and a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm.’ We are also proposing to reduce the length of the bay from 54.6 metres
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday 25 May 2021 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: Committee Room (B6) - Lambeth Town Hall, Brixton, London, SW2 1RW* *In line with legislation and continuing Covid-19 precautions, Committee Members will attend the meeting in person at Lambeth Town Hall. Officers, visiting Ward Members and members of the public are invited to attend virtually. Further instructions about joining the meeting, are provided overleaf. Copies of agendas, reports, minutes and other attachments for the Council’s meetings are available on the Lambeth website. www.lambeth.gov.uk/moderngov Members of the Committee Councillor Scarlett O'Hara (Vice-Chair), Councillor Malcolm Clark, Councillor Jessica Leigh, Councillor Mohammed Seedat, Councillor Iain Simpson, Councillor Joanne Simpson (Chair) and Councillor Becca Thackray Substitute Members Councillor Liz Atkins, Councillor Jennifer Brathwaite, Councillor Marcia Cameron, Councillor Rezina Chowdhury, Councillor Paul Gadsby, Councillor Nigel Haselden, Councillor Maria Kay, Councillor Marianna Masters, Councillor Timothy Windle and Councillor Sonia Winifred Further Information If you require any further information or have any queries please contact: Farah Hussain, Telephone: 020 7926 4201; Email: [email protected] Published on: Thursday 13 May 2021 Queries on reports Please contact report authors prior to the meeting if you have questions on the reports or wish to inspect the background documents used. The contact details of the report author are shown on the front page of each report. @LBLdemocracy on Twitter http://twitter.com/LBLdemocracy or use #Lambeth How to access the meeting In line with legislation, Committee members will attend the meeting in person at Lambeth Town Hall. Due to public health guidance covering health, hygiene and social distancing, officers, visiting Ward Members and members of the public are invited to attend virtually.
    [Show full text]
  • First Agenda Autumn Conference 2020
    First Agenda Autumn Conference 2020 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Section A .................................................................................................................................... 5 A1 Amendments to Standing Orders for the Conduct of Conference to enable an online and telephone Extraordinary Conference to be held in Autumn 2020 ................................. 5 A2 Enabling Motion for an Extraordinary Autumn Conference 2020 to be held online ....... 7 Section B .................................................................................................................................... 8 B1 Food and Agriculture Voting Paper .................................................................................. 8 Section C................................................................................................................................... 15 C1 Adopt the Principle of Rationing to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Arising from Travel, Amending the Climate Emergency and the Transport Chapters of PSS .................. 15 C2 The 2019 General Election Manifesto and Climate Change Mitigation ......................... 17 C3 Animal Rights: Fireworks; limit use and quiet ................................................................ 19 C4 Updating the philosophical basis to reflect doughnut economics ................................. 20 C5 Car and vans to go zero carbon by
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020
    FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020 9 1 CONTENTS Table of Contents 2 Section A (Enabling Motions) 10 Enabling Motions A01 Standing Orders Committee (SOC) Report 10 Enabling Motions A02 Amendments to Standing Orders for the Conduct of Conference 11 to enable an online and telephone Extraordinary Conference to be held in Autumn 2020 Enabling Motions A03 Enabling Motion for an Extraordinary Autumn Conference 2020 12 to be held online Section A – Main Agenda 14 A1 Standing Orders Committee Report 14 A2 Green Party Executive Report 37 A3 Treasurers Report 46 A4 Green Party Regional Council Report 47 A5 Dispute Resolution Committee Report 50 A6 Policy Development Committee Report 54 A7 Complaint Managers Report 57 A8 Campaigns Committee Report 58 A9 Conferences Committee Report 58 A10 Equality and Diversity Committee Report 58 A11 Green World Editorial Board Report 58 A12 Framework Development Group report 58 A13 Climate Emergency Policy Working Group Report 58 Section B 60 B1 Food and Agriculture Voting Paper 60 Amendment 2a 60 Amendment 1a 61 Amendment 2b 61 Amendment 1b 61 Amendment 1c 62 Amendment 1d 62 Amendment 2c 64 2 3 Section C 65 C1 Deforestation (Fast Tracked) 65 C2 Car and vans to go zero carbon by 2030 65 C3 Ban on advertising of high-carbon goods and services 65 C4 The 2019 General Election Manifesto and Climate Change Mitigation 66 Amendment 1 67 Amendment 2 67 C5 Adopt the Principle of Rationing to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Arising from Travel, 67 Amending the Climate Emergency and the Transport Chapters of PSS C6 Updating the philosophical basis to reflect doughnut economics 68 Amendment 1 69 C7 Self Declaration of Gender 69 C8 Animal Rights: Fireworks; limit use and quiet 70 C9 Access to Fertility Treatment 70 Section D 71 D1 Winning over workers is crucial to fighting climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Masks Must Remain Mandatory to Keep Public Safe, Says Green Party
    Greens express profound disappointment over Labour Party failure to support fair voting system 27 September 2021 The Green Party has criticised the Labour leadership for failing to ensure the party backed a vote to support proportional representation at its conference today [Monday 27 September]. [1] Labour conference defeated the motion after it was sent to a card vote. This came after 150 Constituency Labour Parties submitted motions on the topic and more than 83% of members previously said they support the idea. [2] Zack Polanski, Green Party spokesperson on Democracy and Citizen Engagement, said: “This is a really disappointing decision by the Labour Party which shows a real lack of leadership and vision from the top of the party. “Labour members overwhelmingly support electoral reform, yet Keir Starmer has done next to nothing to ensure that his party’s delegates voted through a motion which could have revolutionised British politics and put an end to the Tory stranglehold on our failed democratic system. “In the conference hall, speaker after speaker argued passionately for Labour to adopt proportional representation in its next manifesto, yet it still did not pass. Without proportional representation and electoral cooperation Labour has an impossible mountain to climb and the country faces another five years of chaos with the Conservatives. “It is clear that British voters want to move on from the failure and division caused by the two-party system, and so it is extremely worrying to see Labour fail to grasp the need for a more cooperative and collaborative form of politics which will benefit everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election Candidate Details
    General Election Candidate Details Barking Margaret Hodge, Lab, [email protected] @margarethodge (the sitting MP) Tamkeen Akhterrasul Shaikh, Con, [email protected] @tamkeenshaikh Ann Haigh, Lib Dem, [email protected] Shannon Butterfield, Green, [email protected] Karen Batley, Brexit Party, [email protected] @BatleyKaren Bermondsey and Old Southwark Neil Coyle, Labour, [email protected] @coyleneil Andrew Baker, Con, [email protected] @agsbaker235 Humaira Ali, Liberal Democrat, [email protected] @cllrhumaira Alex Matthews, Brexit Party, [email protected] @apmmatthews Bethnal Green & Bow Rushanara Ali, Lab, [email protected] @rushanaraali (the sitting MP) Nick Stovold, Con, [email protected] @nick_stovold Josh Babarinde, Lib Dem, [email protected] Shahrar Ali, Green, [email protected] @ShahrarAli David Axe, Brexit Party, [email protected] @DavidAxePPC Camberwell & Peckham Harriet Harman, Lab, [email protected] @HarrietHarman (the sitting MP) Peter Quentin, Con, [email protected] Julia Ogiehor, Lib Dem, [email protected] @juliaogiehor Claire Sheppard, Green, [email protected] @ShinyShep Chingford & Woodford Green Iain Duncan-Smith, Con, [email protected] (the sitting MP) Lab, Faiza Shaeen, [email protected] @faizashaheen Geoffrey Seef, Lib Dem, [email protected] @GSeeff Dagenham & Rainham Jon Cruddas, Lab, [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court, Lawyer Letter
    Lord Reed President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Parliament Square London SW1P 3BD [email protected] Cc Rt Hon Alok Sharma MP, President COP26 Rt Hon Michael Ellis QC MP, Attorney General Mr. Tim Crosland, Director, Plan B.Earth Re. Humanity’s Lifeline: the Paris Agreement Temperature Limit March 30, 2021 Dear Lord Reed: We write concerning the Supreme Court’s decision last December, which ruled that the Government’s policy in support of Heathrow expansion was lawful, despite the Government’s failure to take into account the Paris Agreement’s agreed temperature limits which constitute a key part of its architecture.1 There was uncontested evidence before the Court that: ● The expansion of Heathrow Airport would lead to around 40,000,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions from UK aviation by 20502; ● That in order to meet the Paris Temperature Limit (ie 1.5˚C and “well below” 2˚C), carbon dioxide emissions would need to be “net zero” before 20503; and that ● Breaching the Temperature Limits prescribed in the goals of the Paris Agreement would have dire implications for humanity, in particular for the younger generation and the Global South. The Government did not explain how the expansion of Heathrow Airport could be reconciled with the goals agreed in Paris by every country in the world. To the contrary, it argued that the Paris Agreement was “not relevant”4. Chris Grayling MP, the Transport Minister at the time, relied instead on the historic 2˚C temperature limit, rejected by governments (including the UK 1 See R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) (Respondents) v Heathrow Airport Ltd (Appellant) [2020] UKSC 52 2 See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/878705 /uk-aviation-forecasts-2017.pdf, p.107, Table 36 3 See Court of Appeal judgement, para.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Elections of May 2019
    The European Elections of May 2019 Electoral systems and outcomes STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Kai Friederike Oelbermann and Friedrich Pukelsheim PE 652.037 – July 2020 EN The European Elections of May 2019 Electoral systems and outcomes This EPRS study provides an overview of the electoral systems and outcomes in the May 2019 elections to the European Parliament. It analyses the procedural details of how parties and candidates register their participation, how votes are cast, how valid votes are converted into seats, and how seats are assigned to candidates. For each Member State the paper describes the ballot structure and vote pattern used, the apportionment of seats among the Member State’s domestic parties, and the assignment of the seats of a party to its candidates. It highlights aspects that are common to all Member States and captures peculiarities that are specific to some domestic provisions. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR(S) This study has been written by Kai-Friederike Oelbermann (Anhalt University of Applied Sciences) and Friedrich Pukelsheim (University of Augsburg) at the request of the Members’ Research Service, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. The authors acknowledge the useful comments made by Wilhelm Lehmann (European Parliament/European University Institute) on drafts of this paper. PUBLISHER Members' Research Service, Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) To contact the publisher, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript finalised in June 2020. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Printed Minutes PDF 279 KB
    COUNCIL Wednesday 18 October 2017 at 7.00 pm MINUTES The Worshipful the Mayor in the Chair COUNCILLORS PRESENT: Councillor Scott Ainslie, Councillor Adedamola Aminu, Councillor David Amos, Councillor Donatus Anyanwu, Councillor Liz Atkins, Councillor Mary Atkins, Councillor Matthew Bennett, Councillor Alex Bigham, Councillor Anna Birley, Councillor Jennifer Brathwaite, Councillor Linda Bray, Councillor Tim Briggs, Mayor Marcia Cameron, Councillor Rezina Chowdhury, Councillor Malcolm Clark, Councillor Fred Cowell, Councillor Kevin Craig, Councillor Edward Davie, Councillor Jim Dickson, Councillor Max Deckers Dowber, Councillor Jacqui Dyer, Councillor Paul Gadsby, Councillor Annie Gallop, Councillor Adrian Garden, Councillor Nigel Haselden, Councillor Rachel Heywood, Councillor Robert Hill, Councillor Jack Holborn, Councillor Claire Holland, Councillor Saleha Jaffer, Councillor John Kazantzis, Councillor Ben Kind, Councillor Paul McGlone, Councillor Jackie Meldrum, Councillor Diana Morris, Councillor Luke Murphy, Councillor Louise Nathanson, Councillor Matt Parr, Councillor Lib Peck, Councillor Sally Prentice, Deputy Mayor Guilherme Rosa, Councillor Neil Sabharwal, Councillor Mohammed Seedat, Councillor Iain Simpson, Councillor Martin Tiedemann, Councillor Amélie Treppass, Councillor Imogen Walker, Councillor Clair Wilcox, Councillor Andrew Wilson and Councillor Sonia Winifred APOLOGIES: Councillor Danial Adilypour, Councillor Michelle Agdomar, Councillor Marsha de Cordova, Councillor Jane Edbrooke, Councillor Florence Eshalomi, Councillor
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Result of Poll
    London Borough of Lambeth Election of 3 Ward Councillors Bishops Ward Declaration of Result of Poll Date of Election: 22 May 2014 I, Derrick Anderson, Returning Officer, hereby give notice that the number of votes for each Candidate at the election of 3 Councillors for Bishops Ward are as follows: Number of Votes. Candidate name Description of candidate If Elected the Word 'ELECTED' appears against the number of votes BRAITHWAITE Diana Elma Liberal Democrats 949 BRIGHTBART Sam The Green Party 304 CRAIG Kevin Labour Party Candidate 1061 ELECTED CROFT Clive Murray The Green Party 295 FROST David Alan Conservative Party Candidate 292 GORISSEN Bart The Green Party 272 HANNEY Matthew Thomas Liberal Democrats 777 HARRISON Edward Jon Conservative Party 291 HAYES Andrew Robert UK Independence Party (UKIP) 248 KIND Ben Labour Party Candidate 976 ELECTED MORRIS El Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition 63 MOSLEY Jennie Labour Party Candidate 1106 ELECTED ROTHERHAM Lee Stuart Conservative Party Candidate 284 TRUESDALE Peter Jonathan Liberal Democrats 939 The Number of rejected ballot papers was as follows: Number A - Want of an official mark 0 B - Voting for more than three candidates 0 C – Writing or mark by which voter could be identified 0 D – Unmarked or void for uncertainty 0 E – Rejected in part 0 Total 0 Electorate = 7,586 Total votes received = 2,800 Turnout = 36.91 % And I declare that 1. Jennie Mosley 2. Kevin Craig 3. Ben Kind are duly elected as Members for Bishops Ward. Derrick Anderson, Returning Officer. Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Lambeth Town Hall, Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1RW London Borough of Lambeth Election of 3 Ward Councillors Brixton Hill Ward Declaration of Result of Poll Date of Election: 22 May 2014 I, Derrick Anderson, Returning Officer, hereby give notice that the number of votes for each Candidate at the election of 3 Councillors for Brixton Hill Ward are as follows: Number of Votes.
    [Show full text]
  • 142-170 Streatham Hill and Wentworth House in the London Borough of Lambeth Planning Application No.14/06765/VOC
    planning report D&P/1663h/02 6 November 2015 142-170 Streatham Hill and Wentworth House in the London Borough of Lambeth planning application no.14/06765/VOC Strategic planning application stage II referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Variation of condition 2 of planning permission 14/03760/VOC (which granted the variation of condition 13 of planning permission 10/00507/FUL) to allow for minor material amendments to the permitted scheme, to provide 259 residential units and associated revisions to their layouts, tenure mix and dwelling mix; 1,253sqm retail accommodation (A1/A2/A3); relocation and reconfiguration of theatre (303sqm) and community facility (176sqm); 127 car parking spaces revisions to servicing arrangements; improved energy efficiency; and consequential minor revisions to the external design and massing. The applicant The applicant is London Square and the architect is CJCT. Strategic issues Outstanding issues in relation to mixed use, affordable housing, mix of unit sizes, retail, community infrastructure/theatre, amenity space and landscaping, design, inclusive access, energy and transport have been resolved satisfactorily. The Council’s decision In this instance Lambeth Council has resolved to grant permission. Recommendation That Lambeth Council be advised that the Mayor is content for it to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and does not therefore wish to direct refusal or direct that he is to be the local planning authority. Context 1 On 13 March 2015 the Mayor of London received documents from Lambeth Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Sadiq Khan, the Climate Emergency, and the £1Bn Silvertown Road Tunnel
    Sadiq Khan, the Climate Emergency, and the £1bn Silvertown Road Tunnel Silvertown Tunnel protestors with Matthew Pennycook MP for Greenwich and Woolwich at the School Climate Strike on Friday 20 September 2019 Sadiq Khan is silent about his biggest spending commitment as London Mayor, the Silvertown Tunnel. Mayor Khan is now promising a 'Green New Deal' for London - but his administration has just signed a contract to build a massive £1bn new road, that will lock in carbon emissions for decades to come. His decision to build the £1bn Silvertown Tunnel has been kept carefully under the radar – Sadiq never mentions it on social media, for example - and many Londoners still don’t know about it. If this 4-lane Thames road tunnel with dedicated HGV lanes, which effectively doubles the existing Blackwall Tunnel, were planned to run from Battersea to Westminster, things might be different. But it will (if it's ever built) run from Newham in East London to Greenwich. The extra traffic will worsen congestion on the narrow and congested approach roads to the north and south, which run past homes and schools in areas with mostly poorer populations, some of whom already breathe bad air. The decision to sign the contract for Silvertown after declaring a climate emergency, and just before promising a 'Green New Deal' fits into an uncomfortable pattern. Mayor Khan was active supporter of London City Airport expansion, that even the business-minded Mayor Johnson wouldn't permit, and has cancelled walking and cycling schemes such as the Rotherhithe Bridge and the Westway cycleway, claiming that they're unaffordable.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for EU Citizens Living in the UK After Brexit
    Guidance for EU citizens living in the UK after Brexit Are you one of the 3.4 million EU nationals living in the UK? The Government plans to change the immigration rules affecting you after Brexit. If you plan to continue living, working and studying in the UK you will need to apply for permission to remain under the ‘EU Settlement Scheme’. This leaflet provides general guidance on applying for your new status, and we advise you to start this process as soon as possible. Most importantly, we want to send you a clear message: #LDNlovesEU and we want you to stay. Published by Scott Ainslie MEP Green Party, London Do I need to apply for a new What is settled status? What is pre-settled status? status to remain in the UK? In order to continue living in the UK indefinitely, Pre-settled status is a permission to remain for At the moment, most EU/EEA/Swiss citizens have you will need to be granted Settled Status. Settled 5 years (and is called ‘limited leave to enter’ the right to live, work and study in the UK for as status is either a grant of indefinite leave to enter where the application is made outside the UK and long as they wish. However, this will change after (ILE) (where the application is made from outside limited leave to remain (LTR) were the application the UK leaves the EU. the UK) or indefinite leave to remain (ILR) (where is made within the UK. If you have moved to the the application is made from within the UK).
    [Show full text]