Streatham High Road Consultation Report 2018

Proposed changes to parking and loadingProposed bays changes northbound to parking on Streatham and Highloading Road bays between northbound Becmead on StreathamAvenue andRoad Drewstead between BecmeadRoad Avenue Consultationand Drewstead Report Road FebruaryConsultation 2018 Report February 2018

1 Contents

Executive summary ...... 3 1. About the proposals ...... 5 1.1 Introduction ...... 5 1.2 Detailed description ...... 5 2. About the consultation ...... 7 2.1 Purpose ...... 7 2.2 Potential outcomes ...... 7 2.3 Who we consulted ...... 7 2.4 Dates and duration ...... 8 2.5 What we asked ...... 8 2.6 Methods of responding ...... 8 2.7 Consultation materials and publicity ...... 8 2.8 Equalities assessment of the consultation ...... 9 2.9 Analysis of consultation responses ...... 9 3. About the respondents ...... 10 3.1 Number of respondents ...... 10 3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation ...... 10 3.3 Methods of responding ...... 10 3.4 Postcodes of respondents ...... 11 3.5 Interest in the scheme ...... 11 4. Summary of consultation responses ...... 12 4.1 Summary of responses ...... 12 4.2 Summary of stakeholder responses ...... 13 4.4 Comments on the consultation ...... 15 5. Next steps ...... 16 Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments ...... 17 Appendix B: Consultation drawing ...... 19 Appendix C: Survey questions ...... 20 Appendix D: Notification letter and emails ...... 22 Appendix E: List of stakeholders ...... 27

2 Executive summary

Between 1 February and 14 March 2017, we consulted on proposals to extend northbound bus lanes in Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road as part of our London-wide Bus Priority Programme. For the consultation report and our responses to the issues raised during consultation, visit consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streatham-high-road. Between 15 November and 13 December 2017 we consulted on updated proposals to change the parking and loading restrictions on three bays on Streatham High Road, between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road. The proposals consulted on included: • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 148 Streatham High Road (Bay 1) • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 60 Streatham High Road (Bay 2) and reducing the length of the bay • Changing the operation of an existing parking bay outside 34-36 Streatham High Road (Bay 3) and reducing the length of the bay These proposals followed a review of the previous consultation responses and surveys of the usage of these parking and loading bay surveys. They were proposed in order to reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses, whilst still providing loading for local businesses and visitors. We received 33 responses to the consultation, with 12 respondents (36%) opposed to one or more aspects of the proposals and nine respondents (27%) supportive of the proposals in general. In addition, 12 respondents (36%) made no comments in support or opposition of the proposals, or commented on other aspects of traffic in the general area. The main themes raised during the consultation are highlighted below, with a fuller summary of the results in Chapter Four and detailed analysis of comments in Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments

Summary of most frequently made comments • General support for the proposals to remove stationary vehicles from bus lanes • Opposition from local businesses to the proposed change of Bay 3 from parking to disabled parking and loading only

3 • Concern from local businesses that the change to hours of Bay 2 from 10:00- 16:00 to 10:00-13:00 Monday to Saturday would negatively impact their delivery schedules • Concern from local businesses to the reduced length of Bay 2 would negatively impact on their ability to receive deliveries • General opposition to a loss of parking in the area and requests for the local road to have business or resident permits introduced • Calls from local residents and businesses for more to be done to enforce parking and loading bays hour of operation in the area

Next steps Following careful consideration of the consultation responses from local businesses we are no longer proposing to amend the hours of operation of bays 2 and 3. The hours of operation of bay 1 will still be amended, but following responses from local businesses will be changed to 10:00-16:00 Monday to Saturday instead of 10:00- 13:00 as originally proposed. The hours of operation for loading for all bays will therefore be 10:00-16:00. We will proceed with the proposals to reduce the length of Bays 2 and 3. We plan to implement the changes to the bus lanes and the loading and parking bay signage in spring 2018.

4 1. About the proposals

1.1 Introduction The A23 in Streatham is an important bus corridor, with around 90 buses per hour in the peak period, carrying tens of thousands of people daily. Our proposed changes to parking, loading and disabled parking bays on Streatham High Road would reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses while providing loading for local businesses and visitors.

The proposals would complement the bus lane extension we consulted on in early 2017. We will continue to monitor and review the A23 through Streatham to identify opportunities to improve conditions for walking, cycling and bus travel.

1.2 Detailed description You can view detailed description of the proposals, including an annotated diagram, at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd/.

1.2.1 Diagram of proposed changes The consultation diagram is reproduced in Appendix B.

1.2.2 Summary of proposed changes The following text was used to describe the proposals:

We would like your feedback on proposed changes to parking and loading bays northbound on Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road. The proposed changes differ from the proposals we consulted on in February 2017, and follow a review of consultation responses and further parking and loading surveys.

The A23 Streatham High Road is an important bus corridor, with around 90 buses per hour in the peak period, carrying tens of thousands of people daily. We are proposing changes to loading and disabled parking to reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses while still providing parking and loading for local businesses and visitors.

What we are proposing:

5 • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 148 Streatham High Road We are no longer proposing to inset the bay into the footway, as was consulted on previously. Instead, we are proposing a change of hours of operation for the bay to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm’ • Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 60 Streatham High Road We are proposing a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm’ and to reduce the length of the bay from 42.6 metres to 30 metres, to better match the current demand on the bay • Changing the hours of operation of an existing parking bay outside 34-36 Streatham High Road We are proposing to change a parking bay to a loading and disabled parking only bay, and a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm.’ We are also proposing to reduce the length of the bay from 54.6 metres to 38 metres to better match the current demand on the bay

The proposals have been informed by kerbside surveys and are designed to provide a good balance between reducing delays to buses and allowing businesses to continue to use the bays for loading. Spaces for disabled parking are also available on adjacent roads.

Visit consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd to respond to this consultation.

You can also respond to this consultation by emailing or writing to us using the addresses at the top of this letter. You have until Wednesday 13 December 2017 to respond. Please contact us if you would like Braille, large print or foreign language versions of consultation materials.

The changes proposed in this consultation would complement the bus lane extension we consulted on earlier this year and plan to introduce in Spring 2018. The results of that consultation and our response to issues commonly raised can be found at: consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-road

We will continue to monitor and review the A23 through Streatham to identify options to improve conditions for walking, cycling and bus travel, and opportunities to improve road safety in line with the Mayor’s draft Transport Strategy.

6 2. About the consultation

2.1 Purpose The objectives of the consultation were:

• To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond • To understand the level of support or opposition for the proposals • To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware • To understand concerns and objections • To allow respondents to make suggestions

2.2 Potential outcomes The potential outcomes of the consultation were:

• Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide to proceed with the scheme as set out in the consultation • Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we modify the proposals in response to issues raised and proceed with a revised scheme • Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide not to proceed with the scheme • Following careful consideration of the consultation responses and further design development, we modify the proposals and consult on new or additional proposals The next steps for this scheme are set out in this report and the Response to Issues Raised document, which can be found at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd/user_uploads/streatham- high-road-rtir-report-2018.pdf.

2.3 Who we consulted We consulted relevant stakeholders who may be interested in or impacted by the proposals, along with customers / members of the public identified as likely to benefit or disbenefit from our scheme.

7 2.4 Dates and duration The consultation was open for four weeks, from 15 November to 13 December 2017.

2.5 What we asked For those who responded via the online questionnaire we asked how the respondent uses Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road and an open question on whether the respondent had any comments about the proposals.

In addition, we gave respondents the option to answer our standard set of questions designed to give us more information about respondents such as name, postcode, stakeholder status and so on. All questions are reproduced in Appendix C: Survey questions

2.6 Methods of responding We accepted responses through our standard consultation response channels: • Via our website’s online survey • Email to [email protected] • Letter or paper survey sent to FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS In addition, we visited local businesses in the vicinity of the parking and loading baysto get their feedback on the proposals, allowing them to comment and ask questions face-to-face.

2.7 Consultation materials and publicity

2.7.1 Website We published materials at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd/ explaining our proposals.

2.7.2 Letters Members of the public and stakeholders near the scheme were informed via a consultation notification letter sent on the first day of the consultation. The letter was sent to 461 properties within 50 metres of the affected parking and loading bays. The letter is reproduced in Appendix D: Notification letter and emails

8 2.7.3 Emails to stakeholders We sent an email notification to 247 stakeholders identified as relevant to schemes in this area. The text of the email is reproduced in Appendix D: Notification letter and emails and the list of stakeholders is reproduced in Appendix E: List of stakeholders. In addition, we sent an email notification to the 350 stakeholders that responded to the previous consultation to advise them that the Consultation Report and Response to Issues Raised was now available and to make them aware that there were new proposals they may wish to comment on.

2.7.4 Face-to-face engagement We visited 18 businesses on Streatham High Road most likely to be affected by the scheme, answering questions about the proposals and encouraging them to respond to consultation.

2.8 Equalities assessment of the consultation We took steps to ensure that all groups in the community, such as elderly, disability and faith organisations were made aware of the consultation, the potential impacts of the scheme, and how to respond to the consultation. Measures taken included: • Identifying and emailing relevant stakeholders including but not limited to Age UK, Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee, and the Independent Disability Advisory Group, inviting them to respond to the consultation • Ensuring the materials were written in plain English, and were available on request in different formats such as Braille, large print and other languages We are fully aware of our obligations under the Equality Act 2010, in particular the effect of the public sector equality duty on our decision-making.

2.9 Analysis of consultation responses Analysis of consultation responses was carried out by the consultation specialist leading on the project. We used our standard peer-review processes to verify the coding of comments. Detailed comment analysis can be found in Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments

9 3. About the respondents

This section presents information about those who responded to this consultation.

3.1 Number of respondents

Respondents Total % Public responses 16 48 Stakeholder responses 17 52 Total 33 100

3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation

How respondents heard Total % Email from TfL 3 9 Social media 2 6 Friend, relative or neighbour 0 0 TfL website 5 15

Letter from TfL 1 3

Local stakeholder/other 2 6 Read about in the press 3 9 Not answered 17 52 Total 33 100

3.3 Methods of responding

Methods of responding Total % Website 15 46 Email 6 18 Face to face 12 36 Total 33 100

10 3.4 Postcodes of respondents

Postcode Total % SW16 21 64 SW2 1 3 SE19 1 3 Others 2 6 Not answered 8 24 Total 33 100

3.5 Interest in the scheme We asked respondents to identify what interest(s) they had in the scheme. Some respondents did not answer, while others chose one or more interests.

Interest Total % Local resident 9 25 Commuter to or through the area 4 11 Employed locally 14 39 Visitor to the area 3 8 Local business owner 3 8 Council/local councillor 2 6 Other (local transport group) 1 3 Total 36 100

11 4. Summary of consultation responses

4.1 Summary of responses We received 33 responses to this consultation, with 40 comments made. Some respondents were supportive of one aspect of the scheme but opposed to another, or supportive of the proposals but made comments about other schemes/local issues. The breakdown of responses is shown below; we interpreted a level of support or opposition based on the comments made.

4.1.1 Level of support for the proposals

All comments %

Supportive 12 30 Neither supportive nor 4 10 opposed Opposed 16 40 No comments given 8 20 Total 40 100

4.1.2 Issues commonly raised The comments most commonly made by respondents were:

Issue Total General support for removing stationary vehicles from bus lanes 6 Opposition from local businesses to the change of operation of Bay 3 from parking to disabled 6 parking and loading only Opposition from local businesses to changing the loading hours of Bay 2 from 10:00-16:00 to 10:00-13:00 due to the impact this would have on 4 deliveries Opposition from local businesses to the reduced length of Bay 2 due to the impact on deliveries 3 General opposition to a loss of parking in the area and requests for the local roads to have business 2 or resident permits introduced

12 General comments from local residents and businesses about enforcement of the loading and 2 parking times of bays in the area

For our responses to the issues raised during consultation, please see the ‘Response to Issues Raised’ at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high- rd/user_uploads/streatham-high-road-rtir-report-2018.pdf.

4.2 Summary of stakeholder responses This section provides summaries of the feedback we received from stakeholders. The interpretation of whether the respondent supported or opposed the proposals is shown in italics. Although we summarise responses here, the full stakeholder responses are always used for analysis purposes.

Politicians, government departments and parliamentary bodies

Scott Ainslie, Labour cllr for St Leonards ward, LB of Lambeth – Supported The councillor supported changing the parking and loading bay hours to help buses operate more smoothly and reliably. He summarised the comments he had received from local business who were concerned about a loss of parking for customers at Bay 3, noting that these business priorities need to be balanced with public transport aspirations. He stated that TfL should work in partnership with Lambeth Council to ensure that independent local businesses can still get their deliveries. Streatham Business Improvement District (BID) – Neither supported nor opposed

The BID gave us comments from a variety of businesses in the area that we had spoken to or had already responded to the consultation. They did not give a view on their own support of or opposition to the proposals.

Transport and road user groups Streatham Action – Opposed The group said it was concerned about reducing the hours of operation of the loading and parking bays in conjunction with reducing the lengths. They stated that the town centre has very few parking facilities so reduced parking in bays may lead to more parking on side roads that are not subject to the newly proposed Controlled Parking Zone around Streatham Hill.

Businesses Tesco Express – Opposed

13 Tesco Express use Bay 2 for loading and their second delivery of the day comes between 10am and 3pm. The proposals to change the bay’s loading time to 10am – 1pm would be problematic. They also raised a concern that reducing the length of the bay would mean their delivery vehicle could not fit within the bay.

Five Bells public house – Opposed

The Five Bells were strongly opposed to the reduced loading times in Bay 2 as their deliveries come between 10am and 3pm and they cannot dictate delivery slots. They stated that the bay is used by half a dozen nearby businesses so to reduce the length would mean some lorries may have to wait in nearby roads or on red lines. They also raised a concern that traffic is worse southbound on Streatham High Road so more should be done to look at that instead.

Haart – Opposed

Haart advised that their employees and customers use Bay 3 for parking and, with parking on nearby side roads so difficult, losing this bay would be problematic.

Poundland – Supportive

Poundland had no concerns about the reduced length or loading times of Bay 1, however they did raise a concern that many people park in the bay for longer than the allotted time so it needs better enforcement.

Pizza Express – Supportive

Pizza Express thought they would benefit from Bay 3 being changed from parking to loading because it would be more convenient than the side street that they currently use

Swinton Insurance – Opposed

Swinton raised a concern that the loss of Bay 3 for parking would impact their customers.

Estate Office Coffee – Opposed

The owner of this business objected to the loss of Bay 3 for parking because many of his customers use it. He felt he would lose business if the short stay parking amenity was lost.

14 4.4 Comments on the consultation We asked all respondents to rate the quality of our consultation by choosing one of the following descriptions: Very good; Good; Acceptable; Poor; Very poor. The question was not mandatory and 18 people chose not to answer.

Interest Total % Very good 1 3 Good 6 18 Acceptable 5 15 Poor 2 6 Very poor 1 3 Not answered 18 55 Total 33 100%

We also gave respondents the opportunity to comment on the quality of the consultation and the materials. Only two respondents chose to leave comments. Of these two comments, one suggested an alternate bus stop relocation scheme and one commented that TfL ‘cold-called’ her house with a door to door survey which is unacceptable1.

1 The respondent gave their postcode as outside the area where letters were distributed for this consultation. It could be the case that their comment references an experience with another consultation or survey, or they mistakenly entered the wrong post code in their consultation response.

15 5. Next steps

Following careful consideration of the consultation responses from local businesses we are no longer proposing to amend the hours of operation of bays 2 and 3. The hours of operation of bay 1 will still be amended but, following responses from local businesses, will be changed to 10:00-16:00 instead of 10:00-13:00 as originally proposed. The hours of operation for loading for all bays will therefore be 10:00- 16:00. We will continue with the proposals to reduce the length of Bays 2 and 3. We plan to implement the changes to the bus lanes and the loading and parking bay signage in spring 2018.

For our responses to the issues raised during consultation, please see our separate ‘Response to Issues Raised’ document, also published at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd/user_uploads/streatham- high-road-rtir-report-2018.pdf.

16 Appendix A: Detailed analysis of comments

We have summarised the significant issues raised below. Percentages are calculated based on the total number of respondents.

Impact on local businesses 11 respondents commented on how the proposals would affect local businesses:

• Four respondents (12%) said that the loss of parking in Bay 3 would detrimentally affect their business because employees and customers use the bay for short term parking. All stated that parking on nearby roads was difficult • Four respondents (12%) stated that the reduced hours of operation for loading at Bay 2 from 10am-4pm to 10am-1pm would be problematic as they receive deliveries between 10am and 3pm and cannot dictate delivery times. Of these four respondents, three of them were also concerned about reducing the length of Bay 2 • One respondent (3%) was supportive of the change of Bay 3 to loading as this would be more convenient for their business • One respondent (3%) was supportive of the proposals for Bay 1 but raised a concern that the loading and parking times of the bay needs better enforcement • One respondent (3%) raised the concern that, with a lack of parking for customers, the level of footfall around local shops may fall

Impact on bus passengers Eight respondents commented on how they expected the proposals to affect bus passengers: • Two respondents (6%) stated that they believed the proposals would reduce times for bus passengers and they would make the bus lanes operate more smoothly and reliably • Two respondents (6%) supported a no parking policy in all bus lanes • One respondent (3%) suggested that bus lanes on this stretch should be 24/7 • One respondent (3%) suggested a new scheme to relocate bus stop K to balance our the number of bus stops approaching Streatham Hill station • One respondent (3%) suggested that the bus lane should not stretch to Broadlands Avenue Impact on parking

Six respondents commented on how the proposals would impact parking in the local area:

17 • Two respondents (6%) commented that parking (including disabled parking) should be moved from Streatham High Road to side streets • Two respondents (6%) suggested there should be resident and business parking permits, or residential parking zones created on adjacent streets as there is too much competition for parking spaces • One respondent (3%) stated that it should not be made more restrictive to park for short periods of time • One respondent (3%) raised a concern that the tougher hours of operation restriction, the loss of parking in Bay 3 and the reduced length of the bays would force people to park in nearby streets which would not be covered by the newly proposed Controlled Parking Zone near Streatham Hill

Impact on general traffic

Three respondents commented on how the proposals would impact general traffic:

• One respondent (3%) queried whether these proposals would create more traffic • One respondent (3%) suggested that more work should be done to look at traffic going southbound in the PM peak as there is not a traffic flow problem northbound • One respondent (3%) agreed that by reducing on-street parking the proposals would improve the flow of traffic

General comments

Two respondents gave general comments:

• One respondent (3%) stated they were opposed to the changes • One respondent (3%) advised that they do not travel to Streatham

Impact on cyclists

One respondent (3%) commented that bus lanes do not substantially improve the safety for cyclists and TfL should continue to investigate cycling schemes as a high priority.

Impact on local residents

One respondent (3%) raised a concern that Poundland have been receiving deliveries in unsociable hours and were concerned that restricting the hours of operation for Bay 1 would encourage other businesses to do the same.

18 Appendix B: Consultation drawing

19 Appendix C: Survey questions

We asked respondents the following questions: 1. How do you use Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road? (please tick all boxes that apply)

• Pedestrian • Cyclist • Motorist • Motorcyclist • Bus passenger • Coach passenger • Disabled parking bay user • Business that uses the bays for loading • Other (please specify)

2. Do you have any comments or questions about these changes?

3. What is your name?

4. What is your email address?

5. Please provide us with your postcode:

6. Are you (please tick all boxes that apply):

• A local resident • A local business owner • Employed locally • A visitor to the area • A commuter to the area • Not local but interested in the scheme • A taxi/private hire vehicle driver • Other (please specify) [Single line text]

7. If responding on behalf of an organisation, business or campaign group, please provide us with a name: Please note: If you are responding on behalf of an organisation it should be in an official capacity. We reserve the right to verify this.

8. How did you find out about this consultation?

• Received an email from TfL • Received a letter from TfL • Read about it in the press

20 • Saw it on the TfL website • Social media • Word of mouth • Other (please specify) [Single line text]

9. What do you think about the quality of this consultation (for example, the information we have provided, any printed material you have received, any maps or plans, the website and questionnaire etc.)

• Very good • Good • Acceptable • Poor • Very poor

Do you have any further comments about the quality of the consultation material?

21 Appendix D: Notification letter and emails

Notification letter The following letter was sent to all properties within 50 metres of the proposals and included copies of the consultation drawing in Appendix B: Consultation drawing

23 Stakeholder email The following email was sent to 247 stakeholders identified as relevant to schemes in this area: Subject: Have your say on changes to parking and loading bays on Streatham High Road

Dear Sir/Madam

What we are proposing:

• Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 148 Streatham High Road

We are no longer proposing to inset the bay into the footway, as was consulted on previously. Instead, we are proposing a change of hours of operation for the bay to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm’

• Changing the hours of operation of an existing loading and disabled parking bay outside 60 Streatham High Road

We are proposing a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am- 1pm’ and to reduce the length of the bay from 42.6 metres to 30 metres, to better match the current demand on the bay

• Changing the hours of operation of an existing parking bay outside 34-36 Streatham High Road

We are proposing to change a parking bay to a loading and disabled parking only bay, and a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm.’ We are also proposing to reduce the length of the bay from 54.6 metres to 38 metres to better match the current demand on the bay

To respond to this consultation:

• Visit consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd

• Email [email protected]

24 • Write to Transport for London, 10th floor, Zone G4, Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8NJ

You have until Wednesday 13 December 2017 to respond. Please contact us if you would like Braille, large print or foreign language versions of consultation materials.

In addition the following email was sent to 350 stakeholders who had responded to the previous consultation to make them aware that there were new proposals they may wish to comment on:

Subject: Have your say on changes to parking and loading bays on Streatham High Road

Dear Sir/Madam

Earlier this year you responded to our consultation on proposals to extend northbound bus lanes on Streatham High Road between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road. This scheme also included a proposal to inset a loading and disabled parking bay one metre into the footway between Becmead Avenue and Woodbourne Avenue.

We received more than 450 responses to the consultation, with 71% in favour of the proposals. We will therefore progress the proposal to extend the northbound bus lanes on Streatham High Road. Our ‘Response to Issues Raised’ is available here consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-road

Following feedback from the consultation and further parking and loading surveys, we are proposing changes to bays between Becmead Avenue and Drewstead Road to reduce the likelihood of stationary vehicles blocking buses.

What we are proposing:

• Changing the hours of operation of an existing bay outside 148 Streatham High Road

We are no longer proposing to inset the bay into the footway. We are proposing a change of hours of operation for the bay to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am-1pm’

• Changing the hours of operation of an existing bay outside 60 Streatham High Road

25 We are proposing a change of hours of operation to ‘No stopping 7am-7pm except 10am- 1pm’ and to reduce the length of the bay from 42.6 metres to 30 metres, to better match the current demand on the bay

• Changing the hours of operation of an existing bay outside 34-36 Streatham High Road

To respond to this consultation:

• Visit consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/streatham-high-rd

• Email [email protected]

• Write to Transport for London, 10th floor, Zone G4, Palestra, 197 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8NJ

You have until Wednesday 13 December 2017 to respond. Please contact us if you would like Braille, large print or foreign language versions of consultation materials.

The changes proposed in this consultation would complement the bus lane extension we consulted on earlier this year and plan to introduce in Spring 2018.

26 Appendix E: List of stakeholders

Abellio Lambeth Safer Transport Team Action on Hearing Loss Licenced Taxi Drivers Association Action on Hearing Loss (formerly RNID) Living Streets Age Concern London London Ambulance Service Age UK London Borough of Lambeth Alzheimer's Society London Borough of Westminster Asian Peoples Disabilities Alliance London Cab Drivers Club Association of British Drivers London City Airport Association of Car Fleet Operators London Councils Bankside Residents' Forum London Cycling Campaign (Enfield) Better Transport London Cycling Campaign (Lambeth) British Motorcyclists Federation London Cycling Campaign (Lewisham) BT London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Campaign for Better Transport London Gypsies & Travellers Canal & River Trust London London Older People's Strategy Group Central London NHS Trust London Omnibus Traction Society Clapham Society London Suburban Taxi-drivers' Coalition Clapham Transport Users Group London TravelWatch Confederation of Passanger transport London Wildlfe Trust CTC, the national cycling charity Metropolitan Police Heathrow Airport Department for Transport Metropolitan Police Direct Line Group Metropolitan Police Service Disability Alliance MIND Disability Rights UK Motorcycle Action Group Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Motorcycle Industry Association Committee National Autistic Society EDF Energy National Children's Bureau Eurostar Group National Grid Freight Transport Association National Grid - electricity Gatwick Airport Northbank BID GLA Strategy Access Panel members Port of London Authority GLA Strategy Access Panel members Rail Delivery Group Greater London Authority RMT Union Greater London Forum for the Elderly RNIB Guide Dogs for the Blind Association Road Haulage Association Heathrow Airport Consultative Committee Royal Mail House of Commons (local MPs) Royal mAILParcel Force ICE -London Royal Parks Independent Disability Advisory Group Royal Society of Blind Children Joint Committee on Mobility of Blind and Sense Partially Sighted People (JCMBPS) Streatham BID Joint Mobility Unit Streatham Vale Property Occupiers

27 Association Vauxhall Gardens Estate Tenants & Residents Stroke Association Association Sustrans Victoria Business Improvement District Sutton Centre for Voluntary Sector Virtual Norwood Forum Thames Water Whizz-Kidz The British Dyslexia Association Cllr Liz Atkins The Clapham Society Cllr Rezina Chowdhury The Clapham Society Cllr Iain Simpson Cllr Scott Ainslie Thomas Pocklington Trust Cllr Robert Hill TPH for Heathrow Airport Cllr Saleha Jaffer Transport for London Cllr Malcolm Clark Unions Together Cllr Mohammed Seedat Unions Together Cllr Amelie Treppass Unite the union London Central Cab Section

Unite Union