DOCSLIB.ORG

The Anti-Federalist Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Anti-Federalist Papers The Anti-Federalist Papers Introduction By Gordon Lloyd Source: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/fed-antifed/federalist.html Origin of The Federalist The eighty-five essays appeared in one or more of the following four New York newspapers: 1) The New York Journal, edited by Thomas Greenleaf, 2) Independent Journal, edited by John McLean, 3) New York Advertiser, edited by Samuel and John Loudon, and 4) Daily Advertiser, edited by Francis Childs. Initially, they were intended to be a twenty essay response to the Antifederalist attacks on the Constitution that were flooding the New York newspapers right after the Constitution had been signed in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787. The Cato letters started to appear on 27 September, George Mason's objections were in circulation and the Brutus Essays were launched on 18 October. The number of essays in The Federalist was extended in response to the relentless, and effective, Antifederalist criticism of the proposed Constitution. McLean bundled the first 36 essays together—they appeared in the newspapers between 27 October 1787 and 8 January 1788—and published them as Volume 1 on March 22, 1788. Essays 37 through 77 of The Federalist appeared between 11 January and 2 April 1788. On 28 May, McLean took Federalist 37-77 as well as the yet to be published Federalist 78-85 and issued them all as Volume 2 of The Federalist. Between 14 June and 16 August, these eight remaining essays—Federalist 78-85—appeared in the Independent Journal and New York Packet. The Status of The Federalist One of the persistent questions concerning the status of The Federalist is this: is it a propaganda tract written to secure ratification of the Constitution and thus of no enduring relevance or is it the authoritative expositor of the meaning of the Constitution having a privileged position in constitutional interpretation? It is tempting to adopt the former position because 1) the essays originated in the rough and tumble of the ratification struggle. It is also tempting to 2) see The Federalist as incoherent; didn't Hamilton and Madison disagree with each other within five years of co-authoring the essays? Surely the seeds of their disagreement are sown in the very essays! 3) The essays sometimes appeared at a rate of about three per week and, according to Madison, there were occasions when the last part of an essay was being written as the first part was being typed. 1) One should not confuse self-serving propaganda with advocating a political position in a persuasive manner. After all, rhetorical skills are a vital part of the democratic electoral process and something a free people have to handle. These are op-ed pieces of the highest quality addressing the most pressing issues of the day. 2) Moreover, because Hamilton and Madison parted ways doesn't mean that they weren't in fundamental agreement in 1787-1788 about the need for a more energetic form of government. And just because they were written with a certain haste, doesn't mean that they were unreflective and not well written. Federalist 10, the most famous of all the essays, is actually the final draft of an essay that originated in Madison's Vices in 1787, matured at the Constitutional Convention in June 1787, and was refined in a letter to Jefferson in October 1787. All of Jay's essays focus on foreign policy, the heart of the Madisonian essays are Federalist 37-51 on the great difficulty of founding, and Hamilton tends to focus on the institutional features of federalism and the separation of powers. I suggest, furthermore, that the moment these essays were available in book form, they acquired a status that went beyond the more narrowly conceived objective of trying to influence the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalist now acquired a "timeless" and higher purpose, a sort of icon status equal to 1 the very Constitution that it was defending and interpreting. And we can see this switch in tone in Federalist 37 when Madison invites his readers to contemplate the great difficulty of founding. Federalist 38, echoing Federalist 1, points to the uniqueness of the America Founding: never before had a nation been founded by the reflection and choice of multiple founders who sat down and deliberated over creating the best form of government consistent with the genius of the American people. Thomas Jefferson referred to the Constitution as the work of "demigods," and The Federalist "the best commentary on the principles of government, which ever was written." There is a coherent teaching on the constitutional aspects of a new republicanism and a new federalism in The Federalist that makes the essays attractive to readers of every generation. Authorship of The Federalist A second question about The Federalist is how many essays did each person write? James Madison—at the time a resident of New York since he was a Virginia delegate to the Confederation Congress that met in New York—John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton—both of New York—wrote these essays under the pseudonym, "Publius." So one answer to the question is that it doesn't matter since everyone signed off under the same pseudonym, "Publius." But given the icon status of The Federalist, there has been an enduring curiosity about the authorship of the essays. Although it is virtually agreed that Jay wrote only five essays, there have been several disputes over the decades concerning the distribution of the essays between Hamilton and Madison. Suffice it to note, that Madison's last contribution was Federalist 63, leaving Hamilton as the exclusive author of the nineteen Executive and Judiciary essays. Madison left New York in order to comply with the residence law in Virginia concerning eligibility for the Virginia ratifying convention. There is also widespread agreement that Madison wrote the first thirteen essays on the great difficulty of founding. There is still dispute over the authorship of Federalist 50-58, but these have persuasively been resolved in favor of Madison. Outline of The Federalist A third question concerns how to "outline" the essays into its component parts. We get some natural help from the authors themselves. Federalist 1 outlines the six topics to be discussed in the essays without providing an exact table of contents. The authors didn't know in October 1787 how many essays would be devoted to each topic. Nevertheless, if one sticks with the "formal division of the subject" outlined in the first essay, it is possible to work out the actual division of essays into the six topic areas or "points" after the fact so to speak. Martin Diamond was one of the earliest scholars to break The Federalist into its component parts. He identified Union as the subject matter of the first thirty-six Federalist essays and Republicanism as the subject matter of last forty-nine essays. There is certain neatness to this breakdown, and accuracy to the Union essays. The fist three topics outlined in Federalist 1 are 1) the utility of the union, 2) the insufficiency of the present confederation under the Articles of Confederation, and 3) the need for a government at least as energetic as the one proposed. The opening paragraph of Federalist 15 summarizes the previous fourteen essays and says: "in pursuance of the plan which I have laid down for the pursuance of the subject, the point next in order to be examined is the 'insufficiency of the present confederation.'" So we can say with confidence that Federalist 1-14 is devoted to the utility of the union. Similarly, Federalist 23 opens with the following observation: " the necessity of a Constitution, at least equally energetic as the one proposed… is the point at the examination of the examination at which we are arrived." Thus Federalist 15-22 covered the second point dealing with union or federalism. Finally, Federalist 37 makes it clear that coverage of the third point has come to an end and new beginning has arrived. And since McLean bundled the first thirty-six essays into Volume 1, we have confidence in declaring a conclusion to the coverage of the first three points all having to do with union and federalism. The difficulty with the Diamond project is that it becomes messy with respect to topics 4, 5, and 6 listed in Federalist 1: 4) the Constitution conforms to the true principles of republicanism, 5) the analogy of the Constitution to state governments, and 6) the added benefits from adopting the Constitution. Let's work our way backward. In Federalist 85, we learn that "according to the formal division of the subject of these papers announced in my first number, there would appear still to remain for discussion two points," 2 namely, the fifth and sixth points. That leaves, "republicanism," the fourth point, as the topic for Federalist 37-84, or virtually the entire Part II of The Federalist. I propose that we substitute the word Constitutionalism for Republicanism as the subject matter for essays 37-51, reserving the appellation Republicanism for essays 52-84. This substitution is similar to the "Merits of the Constitution" designation offered by Charles Kesler in his new introduction to the Rossiter edition; the advantage of this Constitutional approach is that it helps explain why issues other than Republicanism strictly speaking are covered in Federalist 37-46. Kesler carries the Constitutional designation through to the end; I suggest we return to Republicanism with Federalist 52. For a timeline of the Federalist-Antifederalist debate by Gordon Lloyd, see http://teachingamericanhistory.org/fed-antifed/timeline.html 3 Table of Contents Antifederalist No. 1 - General Introduction .................................................................................... 6 Antifederalist No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minting America: Coinage and the Contestation of American Identity, 1775-1800
    ABSTRACT MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 by James Patrick Ambuske “Minting America” investigates the ideological and culture links between American identity and national coinage in the wake of the American Revolution. In the Confederation period and in the Early Republic, Americans contested the creation of a national mint to produce coins. The catastrophic failure of the paper money issued by the Continental Congress during the War for Independence inspired an ideological debate in which Americans considered the broader implications of a national coinage. More than a means to conduct commerce, many citizens of the new nation saw coins as tangible representations of sovereignty and as a mechanism to convey the principles of the Revolution to future generations. They contested the physical symbolism as well as the rhetorical iconology of these early national coins. Debating the stories that coinage told helped Americans in this period shape the contours of a national identity. MINTING AMERICA: COINAGE AND THE CONTESTATION OF AMERICAN IDENTITY, 1775-1800 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by James Patrick Ambuske Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2006 Advisor______________________ Andrew Cayton Reader_______________________ Carla Pestana Reader_______________________ Daniel Cobb Table of Contents Introduction: Coining Stories………………………………………....1 Chapter 1: “Ever to turn brown paper
    [Show full text]
  • US Founders Respected International Law
    US Founders respected International Law Chile Eboe-Osuji [Paper submitted to the Council on Foreign Relations, on 6 July 2020; also presented orally to the Rutgers International Law & Human Rights Journal's Fall 2020 Lecture Series on 16 November 2020, and appearing in print as adapted from that lecture series in the Rutgers International Law & Human Rights Journal, Vol 1, Ep. 1, April 2021] Contents 1. The US as the Principal Architect of the Modern International Order .............................................. 1 2. Was the ICC created by ‘Self-Styled “Global Governance” Advocates’? ......................................... 16 3. A ‘flawed’ International Legal System ......................................................................................................... 18 4. Is the ICC Truly the ‘Worst Nightmare’ of US Founders?..................................................................... 21 5. Does the ICC Usurp National Sovereignty?................................................................................................ 34 6. Are US Citizens Immune from the Jurisdictions of Non-US Courts? ............................................... 34 7. The Alien Torts Claims Act ............................................................................................................................... 44 8. Self Defence ............................................................................................................................................................ 45 9. Is the ICC Judiciary a Mere Rubber Stamp
    [Show full text]
  • About the Federalist Papers
    About the Federalist Papers The Federalist, commonly referred to as the Federalist Papers, is a series of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison between October 1787 and May 1788. The essays were published anonymously, under the pen name "Publius," in various New York state newspapers of the time. The Federalist Papers were written and published to urge New Yorkers to ratify the proposed United States Constitution, which was drafted in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787. In lobbying for adoption of the Constitution over the existing Articles of Confederation, the essays explain particular provisions of the Constitution in detail. For this reason, and because Hamilton and Madison were each members of the Constitutional Convention, the Federalist Papers are often used today to help interpret the intentions of those drafting the Constitution. The Federalist Papers were published primarily in two New York state newspapers: The New York Packet and The Independent Journal. They were reprinted in other newspapers in New York state and in several cities in other states. A bound edition, with revisions and corrections by Hamilton, was published in 1788 by printers J. and A. McLean. An edition published by printer Jacob Gideon in 1818, with revisions and corrections by Madison, was the first to identify each essay by its author's name. Because of its publishing history, the assignment of authorship, numbering, and exact wording may vary with different editions of The Federalist. The electronic text of The Federalist used here was compiled for Project Gutenberg by scholars who drew on many available versions of the papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivating Student Appreciation of the Federalist Papers with a Handwritten Note by Thomas Jefferson
    Social Education 82(4), pp. 197–201 ©2018 National Council for the Social Studies Sources and Strategies Motivating Student Appreciation of the Federalist Papers with a Handwritten Note by Thomas Jefferson Kaleena Black Thomas Jefferson seldom marked up his books. But he did make a note inside his regulating. Opponents argued that a cen- copy of the first edition of The Federalist (the compiled Federalist Papers), which tral government wasn’t sustainable given he had received in Paris while he was serving as Minister to France in 1788. the size of the country. Other debate stemmed from the lack of a bill of rights Jefferson wrote: in the document, which some worried could threaten personal liberties. Such No. 2. 3. 4. 5. 64. by Mr Jay disagreement cast into doubt whether the Constitution would be ratified at all by No. 10. 14. 17. 18. 19. 21. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 4[5]. 46. 47. 48. the states. Although Hamilton, Madison, 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 62. 63. by Mr Madison and Jay had served as state delegates in the Continental Congress, only Madison the rest of the work by Alexander Hamilton and Hamilton had been involved in the Constitutional Convention. Still, they At first glance, Jefferson’s note (featured ficiency of the subsisting federal govern- all knew what was at stake for the young on p. 198) may just seem like a string of ment, you are called upon to deliberate country. numbers and associated names. Yet this on a new Constitution for the United Motivated to persuade voters in New rare annotation was actually his effort States of America.”1 York that the Constitution deserved to to ascribe authors to each of the essays Just over a month before Federalist be ratified, the three men collaborated contained in a work that still represents No.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FEDERALIST PAPERS Page 1 of 4 Debate Over the Constitution
    THE FEDERALIST PAPERS Page 1 of 4 In October 1787, the first in a series of 85 essays arguing for ratification of the proposed U.S. Constitution appeared in the Independent Journal, under the pseudonym “Publius.” Addressed to “the People of the State of New York,” the essays—now known as the Federalist Papers—were actually written by the statesmen Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, leading supporters of the Constitution and the strong national government it created. They would be published serially from 1787-88 in several New York newspapers. The first 77 essays, including Madison’s famous Federalist 10, appeared in book form in 1788. Entitled The Federalist, it has been hailed as one of the most important political documents in U.S. history. Debate over the Constitution As the first written constitution of the newly independent United States, the Articles of Confederation nominally granted Congress the power to conduct foreign policy, maintain armed forces and coin money. But in practice, this centralized government body had little authority over the individual states, including no power to levy taxes or regulate commerce, which hampered the new nation’s ability to pay its outstanding debts from the Revolutionary War. In May 1787, 55 delegates gathered in Philadelphia to address the deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation and the problems that had arisen from this weakened central government. The document that emerged from the Constitutional Convention went far beyond amending the Articles, however. TAKEN FROM: https://www.history.com/topics/early-us/federalist-papers COLEMAN A. YOUNG POST 202 THE FEDERALIST PAPERS Page 2 of 4 Instead, it established an entirely new system, including a robust central government divided into legislative, executive and judicial branches.
    [Show full text]
  • High School | 9Th–12Th Grade
    High School | 9th–12th Grade American History 1776The Hillsdale Curriculum The Hillsdale 1776 Curriculum 9th–12th Grade HIGH SCHOOL American History 2 units | 45–50-minute classes OVERVIEW Unit 1 | The American Founding 15–19 classes LESSON 1 1763–1776 Self–Government or Tyranny LESSON 2 1776 The Declaration of Independence LESSON 3 1776–1783 The War of Independence LESSON 4 1783–1789 The United States Constitution Unit 2 | The American Civil War 14–18 classes LESSON 1 1848–1854 The Expansion of Slavery LESSON 2 1854–1861 Toward Civil War LESSON 3 1861–1865 The Civil War LESSON 4 1865–1877 Reconstruction 1 Copyright © 2021 Hillsdale College. All Rights Reserved. The Hillsdale 1776 Curriculum American History High School UNIT 1 The American Founding 1763–1789 45–50-minute classes | 15–19 classes UNIT PREVIEW Structure LESSON 1 1763–1776 Self-Government or Tyranny 4–5 classes p. 7 LESSON 2 1776 The Declaration of Independence 2–3 classes p. 14 LESSON 3 1776–1783 The War of Independence 3–4 classes p. 23 LESSON 4 1783–1789 The United States Constitution 4–5 classes p. 29 APPENDIX A Study Guide, Test, and Writing Assignment p. 41 APPENDIX B Primary Sources p. 59 Why Teach the American Founding The beginning is the most important part of any endeavor, for a small change at the beginning will result in a very different end. How much truer this is of the most expansive of human endeavors: founding and sustaining a free country. The United States of America has achieved the greatest degree of freedom and prosperity for the greatest proportion of any country’s population in the history of humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Federalist Kindle
    THE FEDERALIST PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Robert Scigliano | 688 pages | 08 Nov 2001 | Random House USA Inc | 9780375757860 | English | New York, United States The Federalist Papers Instead our foolish government rewards them with a tax free full swamp existance. Good solid work. This needs MUCH more coverage. However: 1. Kotch and everyone else who agrees with is still incapable of showing them wrong to their base about anything. Racism apologist alert. Racism apologists are just racists that hide. And your MSM lies are just ridiculously blatant. Better keep patching your bubble, though reality will eventually get in there. Our readers and foundations. Repeal Citizens United and expose all non-profit organizations spending of donations. Anyway, the guy wrote a wacko piece where he basically alleged that Elena Kagan was a lesbian. This was just after Obama nominated her to the court. Became a bit of a mess as CBS had to take down the column. Big Ben was left with egg on his face. Your email address will not be published. Skip to main content Skip to primary sidebar. Finally, We Know. Past Clues The Uihlein and DonorsTrust grants are the first known donations to The Federalist, but one financial tie was already public. All articles by Alex Kotch. Comments my problem with this sort of chart is that it looks like pay is tracking with corporate profits. Transparency is what we need most. The first sentences are just ad homs. In New York, opposition to the Constitution was particularly strong, and ratification was seen as particularly important.
    [Show full text]
  • MAY: John Jay and the Constitution
    JOHN JAY AND THE CONSTITUTION Few Americans made a more significant contribution to the Constitution than John Jay. One of the leaders of the Federalist Party, Jay felt strongly that the only way the country could survive on the international stage was to appear as one unified entity, not as a league of states. He knew that getting support for a strong federal government would not be easy, but it would be necessary. NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION John Jay was one of the lead authors of the New York State Constitution. The document, which was approved in April 1777, was designed to replace the Colonial Royal Charter, giving all the power to the newly independent State of New York. Many of the rights and freedoms found in the New York State Constitution would go on to influence the United States Constitution. The state constitution established the concept of self- governing, no governmental sponsored religion, and a state court system. It also was one of the first constitutions to create three branches of government: executive, legislative and judicial. Shortly after the ratification of the New York State Constitution, on May 8, 1777, the New York Provincial Congress elected Jay the Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court of Judicature. YOUR LIVES, YOUR LIBERTIES, YOUR PROPERTY, WILL BE AT THE DISPOSAL ONLY OF YOUR CREATOR AND YOURSELVES. YOU WILL KNOW NO POWER BUT SUCH AS YOU WILL CREATE; NO AUTHORITY UNLESS DERIVED FROM YOUR GRANT; NO LAWS BUT SUCH AS ACQUIRE ALL THEIR OBLIGATION FROM YOUR CONSENT. -JOHN JAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1777.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PUZZLE of HAMILTON's FEDERALIST NO. 77 I. a S The
    THE PUZZLE OF HAMILTON’S FEDERALIST NO. 77 SETH BARRETT TILLMAN* I. A STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The Founders, the authors of the Constitution of 1787, much like you and me, were flesh‐and‐blood human beings. As a re‐ sult, we expect to find errors and exaggeration in their written works.1 There is nothing new about that insight. But one al‐ leged error has always struck me as somewhat different from the others. I am speaking of Hamilton’s 1788 publication, Feder‐ alist No. 77. There he wrote: It has been mentioned as one of the advantages to be ex‐ pected from the co‐operation of the senate, in the business of appointments, that it would contribute to the stability of the administration. The consent of that body would be necessary to displace as well as to appoint. A change of the chief magistrate therefore would not occasion so violent or so general a revo‐ lution in the officers of the government, as might be ex‐ pected if he were the sole disposer of offices. Where a man in any station had given satisfactory evidence of his fitness for it, a new president would be restrained from attempting a change, in favour of a person more agreeable to him, by the apprehension that the discountenance of the senate might frustrate the attempt, and bring some degree of dis‐ * Career federal law clerk. Adjunct Professor, Rutgers University School of Law (Newark). The views expressed are solely my own. I thank Professors Adkison, Forte, Hulsebosch, Natelson, and Vile for comments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Theory of the Federalist and the Authority of Publius
    Michigan Law Review Volume 83 Issue 4 1985 The Political Theory of the Federalist and The Authority of Publius Michigan Law Review Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Legal History Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Recommended Citation Michigan Law Review, The Political Theory of the Federalist and The Authority of Publius, 83 MICH. L. REV. 1088 (1985). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol83/iss4/43 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLITICAL THEORY OF THE FEDERALIST. By David F. Epstein. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1984. Pp. ix, 197. $22. THE AUTHORITY OF PUBLIUS. By Albert Furtwangler. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 1984. Pp. 148. $14.95. INTRODUCTION The Federalist Papers are perhaps the most widely researched and discussed work in American political thought. 1 Since their publica­ tion in 1787,2 legal and political scholars have closely scrutinized the documents, seeking insights into the principles underlying the Ameri­ can polity. These eighty-five essays, originally published in serial form at the height of the debate over ratification of the Constitution, have arguably taken on a greater importance in political thought than ever envisaged by their authors;3 James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise Guide to the Federalist Papers As a Source of the Original Meaning of the United States Constitution
    A CONCISE GUIDE TO THE FEDERALIST PAPERS AS A SOURCE OF THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION * GREGORY E. MAGGS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 801 I. DEFINITIONS OF “ORIGINAL MEANING”.............................................. 805 II. THE CREATION AND PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERALIST PAPERS ........ 807 A. Purpose and Intended Audience.................................................. 807 B. Authors ........................................................................................ 809 C. Anonymity.................................................................................... 811 D. Publication .................................................................................. 812 1. Numbering and Text.............................................................. 812 2. Publication of the M’Lean Edition ........................................ 815 3. Publication in New York City Newspapers........................... 815 4. Publication in Other Cities .................................................... 816 E. Content of the Federalist Papers................................................. 817 F. Judicial Consideration ................................................................ 818 III. THEORETICAL BASES FOR CITING THE FEDERALIST AS EVIDENCE OF ORIGINAL MEANING....................................................................... 820 A. The Federalist Papers as Evidence of the Framers’ Original Intent...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist" and the Classical Foundations of the American Republic
    "The Federalist" and the Classical Foundations of the American Republic by Christopher M. Broschart A Thesis submitted to the Graduate School-Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Dr. Gary D. Farney and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Newark, New Jersey May, 2013 Abstract of the Thesis "The Federalist" and the Classical Foundations of the American Republic By Christopher M. Broschart Thesis Director: Gary D. Farney This paper examines the classical themes and ancient historical examples presented through the Federalist Papers of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers represent a lucid sample of early American political theory, and the ideologies of three prominent founders. The study focuses on the Greco- Roman states within those essays that were deemed analogous or relevant to the American Confederacy under the Articles of Confederation, or were used to promote a new federal union under the Constitution. This paper also analyzes the formation of mixed governance constitutions, a vital construction for the creation of modern nations, as the idea progressed through the classical writers Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, and Cicero. Through this analysis, the influences of the Greek and Roman classics are shown to be a formative element in the formation of the American Republic. By reestablishing and reasserting the Classics into the political ideology of that time, insight into the creation of a new Constitution through the combined insight of the Federalist becomes readily apparent. The first section presents an introduction to the Federalist, and the ratification debates of 1787-88.
    [Show full text]