DOCSLIB.ORG

China: Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China: Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the U.S United States International Trade Commission China: Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the U.S. Economy Investigation No. 332-519 USITC Publication 4226 May 2011 U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Deanna Tanner Okun, Chairman Irving A. Williamson, Vice Chairman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Shara L. Aranoff Dean A. Pinkert Robert B. Koopman Acting Director of Operations Nannette Christ Karen Laney Acting Director of Economics Director, Office of Industries Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov China: Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the U.S. Economy Investigation No. 332-519 USITC Publication 4226 May 2011 Project Leaders Alexander Hammer Katherine Linton [email protected] [email protected] Deputy Project Leader Jeremy Wise [email protected] Office of Economics Eric Cardenas, Caitlyn Carrico, Dylan Carlson, Robert Feinberg, Michael Ferrantino, Tani Fukui, Nick Grossman, Joanne Guth, Kyle Hutzler, Kyle Johnson, Seidu Dauda, Nathanael Snow, James Stamps, Danielle Trachtenberg, Samantha Warrington, and Edward Wilson Office of Industries Lisa Ferens Alejandro, Peder Andersen, Tamar Asadurian, Renee Berry, Laura Bloodgood, David Coffin, Cathy Jabara, Jeanette Leary, Kathryn Lundquist, David Lundy, Elizabeth Nesbitt, Samira Salem, and Donald Sussman Special Assistance with the Questionnaire John Benedetto, Rebecca Brofft, Gail Burns, Cindy Cohen, Vincent DeSapio, Rebecca Esmaili, William Greene, Erland Herfindahl, Aaron Honsowetz, Jackie Jones, John Kitzmiller, Eric Land, Aimee Larsen, Lara Lowenstein, Dennis Luther, Erick Oh, Mary Messer, Angela Newell, Samantha Pham, Stefania Pozzi Porter, Amelia Preece, Mathew Reisman, Laura Rodriguez, George Serletis, Amy Sherman, Philip Stone, Karen Taylor, Stephen Wanser, Falan Yinug, and Charles Yost Questionnaire Administrative Support Janice Allen, Phyllis Boone, Judy Bryant, Brenda Carroll, Patricia Cooper, Sharon Greenfield, Lita David-Harris, Carolyn Holmes, Cynthia Payne, Monica Reed, Lemuel Shields, Darlene Smith, and Wanda Tolson Office of the General Counsel Sidney Rosenzweig Content Reviewers Walker Pollard and John Fry Editorial Review Peg Hausman Administrative Support Tabitha Scallan Under the Direction of Arona Butcher, Chief Country and Regional Analysis Division ABSTRACT China’s rapid economic transformation over the past three decades has presented both opportunities and challenges to many U.S. businesses. Despite broad success in the China market, many U.S. companies have reported that two major factors—the infringement of their intellectual property rights (IPR) in China and China’s indigenous innovation policies—have undermined their competitive positions. In response to a U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) survey, many U.S. firms reported losses associated with IPR infringement in China, including losses in sales, profits, and license and royalty fees, as well as damage to brand names and product reputation. U.S. firms have reported losses associated with China’s indigenous innovation policies as well, but have been mostly concerned about the future implications of these evolving policies in such areas as technical standards and preferential support to Chinese firms. In this second of two interconnected reports requested by the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, the Commission was asked to estimate the effect of reported IPR infringement in China and China’s indigenous innovation policies on the U.S. economy and employment, to the extent feasible. This report provides such estimates, on both an economy-wide and sectoral basis, using a combination of analytic tools and qualitative information. i CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................................................................................................ i Acronyms........................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ............................................................................................... xiii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................. 1-1 Objective ................................................................................................................................. 1-2 Approach ................................................................................................................................. 1-4 Using the Questionnaire.................................................................................................... 1-4 Using Statistical and Simulation Analysis........................................................................ 1-4 Using Case Study Analysis............................................................................................... 1-5 Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 1-5 Information Sources................................................................................................................ 1-6 Organization ............................................................................................................................ 1-7 Definitions............................................................................................................................... 1-9 Chapter 2: Trends and Characteristics of Chinese IPR Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies: External Sources ................................................................................................. 2-1 IPR Seizure Statistics .............................................................................................................. 2-1 U.S. Seizures of Counterfeit Goods from China............................................................... 2-1 China’s Role in Counterfeit Goods Trade.................................................................. 2-2 Types of Counterfeits Seized in the United States ..................................................... 2-4 Other Countries’ Seizures of Counterfeits from China..................................................... 2-4 Factors Facilitating Counterfeiting ................................................................................... 2-6 Limitations of Seizure Data .............................................................................................. 2-8 IPR Infringement in China and the Role of the Internet.......................................................... 2-9 Counterfeiting and Piracy on the Internet......................................................................... 2-10 Online Marketplaces for Counterfeits ........................................................................ 2-10 Digital Piracy Mechanisms ........................................................................................ 2-12 IPR Infringement and the Internet: Information Gaps ...................................................... 2-13 Approaches to Measuring IPR Infringement and Indigenous Innovation............................... 2-16 The Costs of IPR Infringement......................................................................................... 2-16 Global Effects of Global Infringement....................................................................... 2-16 Effects on U.S. Economy of Global Infringement ..................................................... 2-17 Sector-Specific Studies of IPR Infringement ............................................................. 2-17 Studies on Other Countries......................................................................................... 2-18 Statistical Studies of Infringement’s Impact on U.S. Firms....................................... 2-18 The Effect of IPR Infringement on Employment ............................................................. 2-20 Patent Protection and Employment Effects................................................................ 2-21 Indigenous Innovation...................................................................................................... 2-21 iii CONTENTS—Continued Page Chapter 3: Reported Effects from IPR Infringement in China on U.S. Economy (Survey Results)............................... 3-1 Key Findings........................................................................................................................... 3-1 Survey Overview: Questionnaire and Methodology ............................................................... 3-2 Sector Selection................................................................................................................ 3-2 Firms that Experienced IPR Infringement in China.......................................................... 3-4 Organization of this Chapter............................................................................................. 3-7 Survey Results: IPR Infringement-Related Losses and Expenses........................................... 3-8 Estimated Losses Due to Chinese IPR infringement ........................................................ 3-9 IPR Infringement Expenses and Impact of Improved IPR Protection and Enforcement.. 3-12 IPR Infringement Expenses.......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prc) International Intellectual Property Alliance (Iipa) 2011 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement
    PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC) INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ALLIANCE (IIPA) 2011 SPECIAL 301 REPORT ON COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Special 301 Recommendation: IIPA recommends that USTR maintain China on the Priority Watch List in 2011.1 Executive Summary: High copyright piracy levels persist in China, from pervasive use of unlicensed software by businesses and pre-installation of unlicensed software (hard disk loading piracy) at the distribution level, to widespread online piracy of music, films, television programming and other copyright materials, and piracy of hard goods. The continued overall lack of deterrence against piracy, market closures or barriers for creative content (some of which have been found to violate China’s WTO commitments), and the imposition or spectre of discriminatory policies toward foreign content, suggest a conscious policy seeking to drive Chinese competitiveness while permitting free access to foreign content through unapproved pirate channels. China’s principal reliance on its woefully under- resourced administrative system to deal with IPR infringements rather than through criminal enforcement presents a significant hurdle to effective enforcement.2 At the same time, with the launch of a new Special Campaign on IP enforcement, and through commitments made in recent bilateral forums, the Chinese Government has indicated measures it will take to achieve higher levels of copyright protection. Specifically, the recent meeting of the Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) in December 2010 and the summit between President Obama and President Hu in January 2011 resulted in a number of important commitments by the Chinese to ensure legal use of software in the government and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), seek effective measures to deal with Internet infringements (including intermediary liability), deal with digital library infringements, and ensure that China’s “indigenous innovation” policies do not effectively limit market access for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Service Journal, July 1975
    FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL JULY 1975 60 CENTS isn I The diplomatic | way to save. ■ All of these outstanding Ford-built cars are available to you at special diplomatic discount savings. ■ Delivery will be arranged for you either stateside or ■ overseas. And you can have the car built to Export* or Domestic specifications. So place your order now for diplomatic savings on the cars for diplomats. For more information, contact a Ford Diplomatic Sales Office. Please send me full information on using my diplomatic discount to purchase a new WRITE TO: DIPLOMATIC SALES: FORD MOTOR COMPANY 815 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006/Tel: (202) 785-6047 NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE/COUNTRY ZIP Cannot be driven in the U.S American Foreign Service Association Officers and Members of the Governing Board THOMAS D. BOY ATT, President F. ALLEN HARRIS, Vice President JOHN PATTERSON, Second Vice President RAYMOND F. SMITH, Secretary JULIET C. ANTUNES, Treasurer CHARLOTTE CROMER & ROY A. HARRELL, JR., AID Representatives FRANCINE BOWMAN, RICHARD B. FINN, CHARLES O. HOFFMAN & FRANCIS J. McNEIL, III State Representatives STANLEY A. ZUCKERMAN, USIA Representative FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL JAMES W. RIDDLEBERGER & WILLIAM 0. BOSWELL, Retired Representatives JULY 1975: Volume 52, No. 7 Journal Editorial Board RALPH STUART SMITH, Chairman G. RICHARD MONSEN, Vice Chairman FREDERICK QUINN JOEL M. WOLDMAN EDWARD M. COHEN .JAMES F. O'CONNOR SANDRA L. VOGELGESANG Staff RICHARD L. WILLIAMSON, Executive Director DONALD L. FIELD, JR.. Counselor HELEN VOGEL, Committee Coordinator CECIL B. SANNER, Membership and Circulation Communication re: Excess Baggage 4 Foreign Service Educational AUDINE STIER and Counseling Center MARY JANE BROWN & Petrolimericks 7 CLARKE SLADE, Counselors BASIL WENTWORTH Foreign Policy Making in a New Era: Journal SHIRLEY R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The
    A Framework for Application Specific Knowledge Engines Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Lai, Guanpi Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 03:58:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204290 A FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE ENGINES by Guanpi Lai _____________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2010 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Guanpi Lai entitled A Framework for Application Specific Knowledge Engines and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 4/28/2010 Fei-Yue Wang _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 4/28/2010 Ferenc Szidarovszky _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 4/28/2010 Jian Liu Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East -1971 (See List of Items Appendix No. 7)
    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 4 Date 22/05/2006 Time 4:43:51 PM S-0865-0003-04-00001 Expanded Number S-0865-0003-04-00001 Title items-in-Peace-keeping operations - Middle East -1971 (see list of items appendix No. 7) Date Created 01/01/1971 Record Type Archival Item Container s-0865-0003: Peace-Keeping Operations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant - Middle East Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit x/, 7 Selected Confidential Reports on OA-6-1 - Middle East 1971 Cable for SG from Goda Meir - 1 January 1971 2 Notes on meeting - 4 January 1971 - Present: SG, Sec. of State Rogers, 0 Ambassador Charles Yost, Mr. Joseph Sisco, Mr. McClosky and Mr. Urquhart t 3) Middle East Discussions - 5 January 1971 - Present: Ambassador Tekoah Mr. Aphek, Ambassador Jarring, Mr. Berendsen 4 Letter from Gunnar Jarrint to Abba Eban - 6 January 1971 x i Letter to Gunnar Jarring from C.T. Crowe (UK) 6 January 1971 *6 Notes on meeting - 7 January 1971 - Present: SG, Sir Colin Crowe 7 Notes on meeting - 7 January 1971 - Present: SG, Mr. Yosef Tekoah 8 "Essentials of Peace"(Israel and the UAR) - 9 January 1971 9 "Essentials of Peace" (Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordon - 9 January 1971 Statement by El Tayalt - 13 January 1971 Minutes of meeting - 13 January 1971 - Present: M. Masmoudi, El-Goulli, Mr. Fourati, Mr. Jarring, Mr. Berendsen^ Letter from William P. Rogers - 15 January 1971 Letter - Middle East - 15 January 1971 Implementation of Security Council Resolution 242 of 22 November 1967 For The Establishment of a Just and Lasting Peace in the Middle East - 18 January 1971 C H-^-^ ?-«-r-"~) Comparison of the papers of Israel and the United Arab Republic 18 January 1971 L " Notes on meeting - 19 January 1971 - Present: SG, Ambassador Yost, USSR - 1 January 1971 - Middle East Communication from the Government of Israel to the United Arab Republic through Ambassador Jarring - 27 January 1971 France - 27 January 1971 - Middle East Statement by Malik Y.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Genaro Yellow Paper
    Genaro Network Yellow Paper Genaro Network Roadmap Towards a Multi-Source Data Governance Framework Yellow Paper v1.0.1 Page | 1 Genaro Network Yellow Paper Abstract The Genaro Network is a new public blockchain platform based on peer-to-peer encryption and sharing. The platform aims to realize highly efficient node management on the public chain based on PoS (Proof of Stake) and SPoR (Sentinel Proof of Retrievability). The vision of Genaro is to establish a new medium of distributed and encrypted storage, and to enable each user to use and share data, and to establish abundant distributed applications (DApps) on the blockchain and provide stable support for these. Compared with other public chains, Genaro has the following advantages: (1) Genaro modified the use of file sentinels to better suit distributed systems through the combination of PoS and SPoR, thus enhancing the ability to defend against replay attacks; (2) in the design of chain-style PoS, Genaro studied famous PoS methods such as Casper (CFFG, CTFG)， Tendermint, and Ouroboros, analyzed the major ways of attacking PoS and proposed relevant schemes; and (3) in terms of management structure, Genaro combines the proof of data integrity and PoS, and provides effective methods of defense against potential problems in PoS. In addition, in terms of the data structure in the public chain, Genaro has developed the GSIOP protocol in line with up-to-date methods of storage encryption, so as to settle different layers of data usage. Finally, in terms of adding data, Genaro has also added relevant VM order sets. Table of Contents 1 Genaro's Vision..................................................3 3.3 File Sharing Based on Proxy Recryption...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • China Autos 2020 Outlook – Slow Lane to a Full Recovery
    2 December 2019 China EQUITIES China autos Macquarie China auto coverage 2020 outlook – slow lane to a full recovery Name Ticker Price Rating TP +/- Brilliance 1114 HK 8.17 Outperform 10.10 23.6% Dongfeng 489 HK 7.64 Outperform 8.10 6.0% Key points GAC 2238 HK 8.52 Outperform 9.60 12.7% SAIC Motor 600104 CH 23.04 Outperform 31.50 36.7% Cautious outlook for 2020 PV demand, mainly considering weak demand Nexteer 1316 HK 6.66 Outperform 12.15 82.4% from lower-tier cities, increased household leverage and rising CPI. Minth 425 HK 27.30 Outperform 25.80 -5.5% Geely 175 HK 15.08 Neutral 11.20 -25.7% We expect to see further relaxation of the license plate quota in 2020. Yutong Bus 600066 CH 14.31 Neutral 12.70 -11.3% BAIC 1958 HK 4.51 Neutral 4.20 -6.9% Sector preference: higher-end > lower-end > NEVs. Near-term risks on the BYD 1211 HK 38.15 Underperform 20.70 -45.7% downside. OP: Brilliance, DFG, GAC; UP: GWM, BYD, CATL. CATL 300750 CH 87.41 Underperform 60.30 -31.0% Great Wall 2333 HK 6.04 Underperform 3.70 -38.7% Changan-B 200625 CH 3.54 Underperform 3.10 -12.4% Changan-A 000625 CH 8.31 Underperform 3.60 -56.7% Conclusions Note: updated as of 28 November closing prices; Prices are denominated in Rmb for A-share stocks, and HKD for A slow road back to recovery: We lower our 2020 China auto sales by 5% B/H-share stocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Formal and Informal: the Shakeout in China's Online Video
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Zhao, Elaine& Keane, Michael (2013) Between formal and informal: the shakeout in China’s online video indus- try. Media, Culture and Society, 35(6), pp. 724-741. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/55721/ c c The Author(s) 2013 This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713491301 Between formal and informal: the shakeout in China’s online video industry Elaine Jing Zhao Introduction Chinese media is often characterised by a lack of autonomy and dependence on conservative regulatory bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The
    JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The Personnel Series, consisting of approximately 17,900 pages, is comprised of three subseries, an alphabetically arranged Chiefs of Mission Subseries, an alphabetically arranged Special Liaison Staff Subseries and a Chronological Subseries. The entire series focuses on appointments and evaluations of ambassadors and other foreign service personnel and consideration of political appointees for various posts. The series is an important source of information on the staffing of foreign service posts with African- Americans, Jews, women, and individuals representing various political constituencies. Frank assessments of the performances of many chiefs of mission are found here, especially in the Chiefs of Mission Subseries and much of the series reflects input sought and obtained by Secretary Dulles from his staff concerning the political suitability of ambassadors currently serving as well as numerous potential appointees. While the emphasis is on personalities and politics, information on U.S. relations with various foreign countries can be found in this series. The Chiefs of Mission Subseries totals approximately 1,800 pages and contains candid assessments of U.S. ambassadors to certain countries, lists of chiefs of missions and indications of which ones were to be changed, biographical data, materials re controversial individuals such as John Paton Davies, Julius Holmes, Wolf Ladejinsky, Jesse Locker, William D. Pawley, and others, memoranda regarding Leonard Hall and political patronage, procedures for selecting career and political candidates for positions, discussions of “most urgent problems” for ambassadorships in certain countries, consideration of African-American appointees, comments on certain individuals’ connections to Truman Administration, and lists of personnel in Secretary of State’s office.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Issues: Cabinet Rank of the US
    Updated December 22, 2020 United Nations Issues: Cabinet Rank of the U.S. Permanent Representative The U.S. Permanent Representative is the chief as a means of maintaining communication and the flow of representative of the United States to the United Nations. information among key Administration officials. The President appoints the Permanent Representative with the advice and consent of the Senate. Of the 30 individuals By tradition, permanent Cabinet membership comprises the President, the heads of the executive departments and, in who have served since 1946, approximately two-thirds have more recent decades, the Vice President. Beginning with been accorded Cabinet rank by Presidents. Some Members of Congress have demonstrated an ongoing interest in the Dwight D. Eisenhower, each President also has accorded Cabinet rank to select senior executive branch leaders, Cabinet rank of the Permanent Representative in the context including the U.S. Permanent Representative. The positions of the Senate confirmation process and broader U.S. policy toward the United Nations. On November 24, 2020, and individuals granted this distinction vary by presidency and, sometimes, within a presidency. Some positions, President-elect Biden announced his intent to nominate including the Administrator of the Environmental Linda Thomas-Greenfield to be Permanent Representative, with Cabinet rank. Biden stated that he will accord Cabinet Protection Agency, the United States Trade Representative, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and status to Greenfield “because I want to hear her voice on all the White House Chief of Staff, have all consistently been the major foreign policy discussions we have.” accorded this status over the past three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company Posts Record Annual Sales in China; Sales Rise 14% to 1.27 Million; Lincoln Demand Surges 180%
    2017-1-6 | Shanghai Ford Motor Company Posts Record Annual Sales in China; Sales Rise 14% to 1.27 Million; Lincoln Demand Surges 180% • Ford Motor Company sold a record 1.27 million vehicles in 2016 in China, up 14 percent • Changan Ford JV sold 957,495 vehicles in 2016; December sales total 115,654 vehicles • Jiangling Motor Corp. sold 265,056 vehicles in 2016; December sales total 32,193 vehicles • Lincoln sold 32,558 vehicles in 2016, nearly three-fold increase over 2015 SHANGHAI,Jan. 4, 2017-- Ford Motor Company sales surged 23 percent in China in December, capping a record year for the automaker in the world’s largest new vehicle market. For all of 2016, Ford Motor Company sales totaled a best-ever 1.27 million vehicles, 14 percent higher than 2015. That total includes sales by joint ventures Changan Ford Automobile and Jiangling Motors Corporation, sales of Ford models imported to China and Lincoln, which has become the fastest growing luxury brand in China. In December alone, Ford and its joint ventures sold nearly 150,000 vehicles in China, up 21 percent over 2015. The growth was driven by strong demand for Ford’s expanded lineup of SUVs such as the Ford Edge and Explorer, the Ford Taurus large car, and performance vehicles such as the Ford Mustang. “We have built some great sales momentum in China, particularly in the second half of 2016, on the strength of our expanded vehicle lineup,” said Peter Fleet, vice president of Marketing, Sales and Service, Asia Pacific. “Record numbers of customers are choosing our 3-row Edge crossover, elegant Taurus sedan, Explorer premium SUV and Lincoln luxury vehicles.” Changan Ford Automobile, Ford's passenger car joint venture, broke both annual and December sales records.
    [Show full text]
  • China Autos Driving the EV Revolution
    Building on principles One-Asia Research | August 21, 2020 China Autos Driving the EV revolution Hyunwoo Jin [email protected] This publication was prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. and/or its non-U.S. affiliates (“Mirae Asset Daewoo”). Information and opinions contained herein have been compiled in good faith from sources deemed to be reliable. However, the information has not been independently verified. Mirae Asset Daewoo makes no guarantee, representation, or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy, or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this document. Mirae Asset Daewoo accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any loss arising from the use of this document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. Information and opin- ions contained herein are subject to change without notice. This document is for informational purposes only. It is not and should not be construed as an offer or solicitation of an offer to purchase or sell any securities or other financial instruments. This document may not be reproduced, further distributed, or published in whole or in part for any purpose. Please see important disclosures & disclaimers in Appendix 1 at the end of this report. August 21, 2020 China Autos CONTENTS Executive summary 3 I. Investment points 5 1. Geely: Strong in-house brands and rising competitiveness in EVs 5 2. BYD and NIO: EV focus 14 3. GAC: Strategic market positioning (mass EVs + premium imported cars) 26 Other industry issues 30 Global company analysis 31 Geely Automobile (175 HK/Buy) 32 BYD (1211 HK/Buy) 51 NIO (NIO US/Buy) 64 Guangzhou Automobile Group (2238 HK/Trading Buy) 76 Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 2 August 21, 2020 China Autos Executive summary The next decade will bring radical changes to the global automotive market.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Special 301 Report
    2012 Special 301 Report Ambassador Ronald Kirk Office of the United States Trade Representative ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is responsible for the preparation of this report. U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk gratefully acknowledges in particular the contributions of Deputy U.S. Trade Representatives Demetrios Marantis, Michael Punke, and Miriam Sapiro; USTR General Counsel Timothy Reif; Chief of Staff Lisa Garcia; and Assistant USTR for Public/Media Affairs Carol Guthrie, Assistant USTR for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement Christine Turner, Assistant USTR for Congressional Affairs Mac Campbell, Executive Secretary William Mack, Senior Policy Advisor Holly Smith, Senior Advisor David Roth, Assistant USTR for Intellectual Property and Innovation Stan McCoy, Director for Intellectual Property and Innovation Paula Karol Pinha, and numerous other staff of the Office of Intellectual Property and Innovation, the Office of General Counsel, and other USTR offices. Thanks are extended to partner Executive Branch agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Justice, Labor, Transportation, Treasury, and State. In preparing the report, substantial information was solicited from U.S. Embassies around the world and from interested stakeholders. The draft of this report was developed through the Special 301 Subcommittee of the interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee. April 2012 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]