Antiprotons in the Big Machine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antiprotons in the Big Machine Antiprotons in the big machine Right the beam line which injects 26 GeV antiprotons into the SPS. Centre, the beam fine which sends high energy protons from the SPS towards the West Experimental Area. The main ring is on the left. (Photo CERN 38.4.81) On 7 July a pulse of antiprotons was sent to the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron, accelerated to 270 GeV and (briefly) stored. Two days later the exercise was repeated with greater success and the first evi­ dence obtained for proton-antipro­ ton collisions at 540 GeV — by far the highest collision energies ever achieved. Although there is still much to be done before the scheme becomes fully operational, this achievement is a major milestone in the CERN antiproton story. The origins of the project Antiprotons, since they presuma­ bly have the same properties as protons except for the sign of their electric charge, can be accelerated and stored in the same magnet ring as protons. Thus colliding beam sys­ tems, like the familiar electron-posi­ tron machines, are, in principle, fea­ sible. However until recently it was not possible to produce antiproton tion, the antiprotons emerge with a for colliding beam physics. It in­ beams of sufficient intensity and wide range of momenta, distinctly volves using electron beams travel­ density to give sufficient collisions in unsuitable for a magnet system in a ling along with the antiproton beam a reasonable enough time for useful beam transfer line, an accelerator or at the same velocity. The electron physics to be done. a storage ring which is designed to beam, which is much easier to con­ This situation has changed with handle a well defined particle mo­ trol, has particles at precisely the the invention of 'beam cooling'. The mentum. Only antiprotons at or very desired momentum. In the subse­ technique gets its name from the near to the design momentum could quent antiproton-electron collisions, relationship between temperature be guided — the rest would stray off the antiprotons transfer momentum and particle energy — the higher the into the walls of the vacuum cham­ to the electrons in such a way that temperature of a body, the higher the ber. the antiproton momenta are concen­ particle energies. However beam The advent of beam cooling ena­ trated around the desired value. cooling refers not to a process bles an antiproton beam with an This idea of 'electron cooling' was whereby all the particle energies in initially quite wide span of momenta successfully tested at Novosibirsk the beam are reduced (so that the to be concentrated around a particu­ in 1 975, and has subsequently also beam is made cold), but to a process lar momentum so that a dense beam been demonstrated at CERN and at which concentrates all the particle can be built up and the subsequently Fermilab. However at CERN, an energies around a particular value. It encountered magnet systems can alternative idea called 'stochastic is the variation of energies around hold the beam. cooling' was invented by Simon van this value which is 'cooled down'. A cooling technique was proposed der Meer in 1968. The word sto­ Antiprotons are produced in the in 1966 by Gersh Budker and his chastic means random — stochastic collisions of protons with a metal colleagues at the Institute for Nu­ cooling operates by reducing the target at relatively low rates — typi­ clear Studies at Novosibirsk in the random motion of the particles in a cally it needs about a million protons USSR with the specific aim of beam. It was invented to improve the to produce each antiproton. In addi­ achieving intense antiproton beams density (and hence the luminosity) of CERN Courier, September 1981 289 The ICE Ring, scene of much of the early development work on beam cooling at CERN. (Photo CERN 80.9.78) dered. In tests in the ICE ring in 1 979 (see October 1979 issue, page 312), it was also clearly established that antiprotons live long enough to make the whole scheme feasible. The role of the Antiproton Accumu­ lator The heart of the antiproton project is the Antiproton Accumulator (AA) where the stochastic beam cooling technique is applied to build up anti­ proton beams tens of thousands of times more intense than have ever been achieved before. Protons are first accelerated in the Proton Synchrotron. Instead of be­ ing evenly distributed in twenty bunches around the PS ring, as in a normal acceleration cycle, they are crowded into five bunches occupy­ ing a quarter of the ring. As the 50 m diameter AA ring is one quarter the size of the PS, these protons, when the beams in the Intersecting Stor­ electron cooling. The results from they strike a target, produce a length age Rings. ICE, particularly on stochastic cool­ of antiproton beam which fills the The distribution of particles across ing, were so spectacular that in circumference of the AA. a beam is observed at 'pick-up sta­ 1978 CERN was able to give the When the protons reach 26 GeV tions' in the ring, and from this green light to an antiproton project they are ejected from the PS and information the centre of gravity of which had been promoted particu­ strike a target in front of the AA ring. the beam density is calculated. As it larly by Carlo Rubbia. This was then From the spray of secondary parti­ passes further around the ring, the authorized in the confidence that, for cles, a focusing system selects anti- same section of the beam is sub­ the first time, antiproton beams of protons of energy around 3.5 GeV jected to an electric field which sufficient intensity and density could for injection into the AA. This energy nudges the measured centre of grav­ be achieved to make proton-antipro­ gives the maximum yield of antipro­ ity towards the desired value. Be­ ton physics possible. tons — for each pulse of 1013 pro­ cause of the random distribution of According to our present under­ tons on target, some 2 x 107 anti- particles, this push acts unfavoura­ standing of particle physics, the pro­ protons are injected. (In other words, bly on some particles, taking them ton and its antiparticle should be for every million protons hitting the further from the required conditions, equally stable. The proton lives for at target only two antiprotons are col­ but works favourably on the majori­ least 10 30 years, if not for ever. lected!) This operation is repeated ty. Over millions of repetitions, the However up till quite recently physi­ every 2.4 s. beam is progressively cooled. cists had never been able to test the Eventually the AA is required to The technique was first success­ stability of the antiproton. If it had provide beams containing 6x10 11 fully demonstrated at the ISR in turned out that the antiproton were particles, and about 30 000 PS 1 975. This led to the construction of nowhere near as stable as the pro­ pulses (representing about a full a small storage ring aptly known as ton, theorists would have had to day's operation of the machine) will ICE— Initial Cooling Experiment — have a major rethink, and the whole be needed to supply all these anti­ specifically to study stochastic and antiproton project might have foun­ protons. 290 CERN Courier, September 1981 One of the magnets of the AA ring, showing its very large aperture. (Photo CERN 49.3.80) The AA's vacuum chamber is unu­ sually large (70 cm wide) to give space for all the necessary ma­ noeuvres and is held at high vacuum (1 0~10 torr) to minimize loss of anti­ protons due to collisions with resi­ dual gas molecules. The first pulse is injected and bent by 'kicker magnets' so that the anti­ protons orbit on the outside of the vacuum chamber. During injection, this region is shielded from the rest of the chamber by a mechanically operated shutter. This protects the antiprotons subsequently stored in the main body of the chamber from the magnetic fields of these kickers, and makes it possible to cool the low density injected beam without being swamped by the much stronger sig­ nals from the high density stack. The first injected pulse is monitored at pick-up stations and other kicker magnets act upon it to cool the antiprotons. In two seconds the pulse is pre- cooled so that the momentum 60 000 injected pulses later, some AA, the injection and ejection sys­ spread of the particles is reduced by 1012 antiprotons would be orbiting tems are located in the same section a factor of ten. The shutter is then in the stack, with the majority (6 x of the ring. The antiproton beam lowered and the precooled antipro­ 1 0 11) of them concentrated in the therefore has to be turned around in tons moved into the stack position in core, thanks to the cooling system. It a loop of magnets before it can be the main body of the chamber. The is this core which will provide the injected into the PS, where it circu­ shutter rises again and the second intense antiproton beam for colliding lates in the opposite direction to the pulse is injected to receive the same beam physics. protons. The antiprotons are then treatment. A residue of some 4 x 10 11 anti­ accelerated in six bunches from 3.5 While this sequence of injection, protons would remain in the AA to 26 GeV, when they can be sent precooling and transfer to the stack stack to start the next core. Injection either to the SPS or the ISR.
Recommended publications
  • The LHC Project and Future of CERN
    The LHC Project and Future of CERN Robert Aymar Symposium on Physics of Elementary Interactions in the LHC Era Warsaw, 21–22 April 2008 Contents about CERN: a facility for the benefit of the European Particle Physics Community the LHC project: completion of installation, start of commissioning for accelerator, experiments and computing, the CNGS: start of operations and the CLIC scheme for multi Tev e+e- Linear Collider plans for CERN in the next decade Warsaw, 21-22 April 2008 2 CERN… • Seeking answers to questions about the Universe • Advancing the frontiers of technology • Training the scientists of tomorrow • Bringing nations together through science 33 CERN in Numbers • 2415 staff* • 730 Fellows and Associates* • 9133 users* • Budget (2007) 982 MCHF (610M Euro) *5 February 2008 • Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. • Observers to Council: India, Israel, Japan, the Russian Federation, the United States of America, Turkey, the European Warsaw, 21-22Commission April 2008 and Unesco 4 Distribution of All CERN Users by Nation of Institute on 5 February 2008 Warsaw, 21-22 April 2008 5 CERN: the World’s Most Complete Accelerator Complex (not to scale) Warsaw, 21-22 April 2008 6 TheThe LongLong--TermTerm ScientificScientific ProgrammeProgramme Legend: Approved Under Consideration 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 LHC Experiments ALICE ATLAS CMS LHCb TOTEM LHCf Other LHC Experiments (e.g. MOEDAL) Non-LHC Experimental Programme SPS NA58 (COMPASS) P326 (NA48/3)/NA62 P327 (EM processes in strong crystalline fields) NA49-future/NA61 Neutrino / CNGS New initiatives PS PS212 (DIRAC) PS215 (CLOUD) OTHER FACILITIES AD ISOLDE n-TOF Neutron CAST P331 (optical axion search and QED test) Test Beams North Areas West Areas East Hall R&D (Detector & Accelerator) 7 Poland and the Four Strategic Missions of CERN FUNADAMENTAL RESEARCH • Polish physicists collaborate with CERN since 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • PRODUCTION of HIGH MASS Cv and E'e' PAIRS in the UA2
    142 PRODUCTION OF HIGH MASS cv AND e'e' PAIRS IN THE UA2 EXPERIMENT AT THE CERN pp COLLIDER The UA2 Collaboration (Berne, CERN, CopenhagenT Orsay;" Pavía, Sacïay) Dî 84100S6163 presented by J. SCHACHER University of Berne, Switzerland ABSTRACT We present new results on intermediate vector boson production at the CERN pp collider. A comparison is made with the predictions of the standard model of the unified electroweak Glashow-Salam-Weinberg theory. - 143 - 1, INTRODUCTION We report here the results from a search for electrons with > 15 GeV/c produced at the CERN pp collider (Vs = 540 GeV) during its 1982 and 1983 periods of operation. Following a general discussion of the topology of the events containing an electron candidate, we shall compare the data with expectations in the framework of the electroweak standard model [1] for the reactions p + p - W~ + anything (1) - e" • v (?) p • p - Z° + anything (2) -* e* + e" or e* + e" + y where W~ and Z° are the postulated charged and neutral Intermediate Vector Bosonc (IVB), respectively, According to the amount of data collected we are now in the position to study some details of the IVB production, e.g. the influence of emission of gluon radiation on the distribution of the W transverse momentum (Fig.1). Fig.l Typical diagram for W and Z production, taking into account emission of gluon (g) radiation. 7T : parton in p or p. - 144 - Preliminary results from the study reported here have already been presented elsewhere [2] and a more complete discussion can be found in a recent publication [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Fabiola Gianotti
    Fabiola Gianotti Date of Birth 29 October 1960 Place Rome, Italy Nomination 18 August 2020 Field Physics Title Director-General of the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CERN, Geneva Most important awards, prizes and academies Honorary Professor, University of Edinburgh; Corresponding or foreign associate member of the Italian Academy of Sciences (Lincei), the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, the French Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society London, the Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts of Barcelona, the Royal Irish Academy and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Honorary doctoral degrees from: University of Uppsala (2012); Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (2013); McGill University, Montreal (2014); University of Oslo (2014); University of Edinburgh (2015); University of Roma Tor Vergata (2017); University of Chicago (2018); University Federico II, Naples (2018); Université de Paris Sud, Orsay (2018); Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Annecy (2018); Weizmann Institute, Israel (2018); Imperial College, London (2019). National honours: Cavaliere di Gran Croce dell'Ordine al Merito della Repubblica, awarded by the Italian President Giorgio Napolitano (2014). Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics (shared, 2013); Enrico Fermi Prize of the Italian Physical Society (shared, 2013); Medal of Honour of the Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen (2013); Wilhelm Exner Medal, Vienna (2017); Tate Medal of the American Institute of Physics for International Leadership (2019). Summary of scientific research Fabiola Gianotti is a particle physicist working at high-energy accelerators. In her scientific career, she has made significant contributions to several experiments at CERN, including UA2 at the proton-antiproton collider (SpbarpS), ALEPH at the Large Electron-Positron collider (LEP) and ATLAS at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Model and Measurements of Its Parameters (Like the Mass of the Top Quark) at Hadron Colliders Are Presented
    Title: Physics at Hadron Colliders Lecturer: Dr Karl Jakobs Date and Times: 1st August at 11:15 2nd August at 10:15 3rd August at 10:15 3rd August at 11:15 Summary of the proposed talk: Present and future hadron colliders play an important role in the investigation of fundamental questions of particle physics. After an introductory lecture, tests of the Standard Model and measurements of its parameters (like the mass of the top quark) at hadron colliders are presented. In addition, it will be discussed how the Higgs boson can be searched for at hadron colliders and how "New Physics", i.e. physics beyond the Standard Model, can be explored. Results are presented from the currently ongoing run at the Tevatron proton antiproton collider at the US research lab Fermilab. In addition, the rich physics potential of the experiments at the CERN Large Hadron Collider is discussed. Prerequisite knowledge and references: - The Standard Model (Lecture by A. Pich) - Beyond the Standard Model (Lecture by E. Kiritsis) Biography- Brief CV: Dr Karl JAKOBS -Studied Physics at the University of Bonn, Germany - Summer student at CERN in 1984 - PhD at the University of Heidelberg, in 1988 Thesis on the UA2-Experiment at the CERN Proton-Antiproton Collider (already Hadron Collider physics at that time) - Fellow and staff position at CERN, UA2 experiment - 1992 - 1996 Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich ALEPH and ATLAS experiments - 1996 - 2003 Prof. of physics at the University of Mainz ALEPH and ATLAS experiments - Since 2000: participation in the D0-Experiment at the Tevatron HR-RFA 07/06 - Since 2003: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model 30 Years of Glory
    FR0107537 LAX66-128 March 2001 The Standard Model 30 Years of Glory Jacques Lefrangois Laboratoire de l'Accelerateur Lineaire IN2P3-CNRS et Universite de Paris-Sud, BP 34, F-91898 Orsay Cedex Lectures given at the 11th Advanced Study Institute on Techniques and Concepts in High Energy Physics, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, USA, June 15-26, 2000 U.E.R Institut National de de Physique Nucleaire 1'Universite Paris-Sud et de Physique des Particules 5 2/ § 8 B.P. 34 ~ Bailment 200 ~ 91898 ORSAY CEDEX LAL 00-128 March 2001 Doc. Enreg. ie. THE STANDARD MODEL 30 YEARS OF GLORY Jacques Lefrangois Laboratoire de VAccelerateur Lineaire IN2P3-CNRS et Universite PARIS-SUD Centre Scientifique d'Orsay - Bat. 200 - B.P. 34 91898 ORSAY Cedex (France) [email protected] In these three lectures, I will try to give a flavour of the achievements of the past 30 years, which saw the birth, and the detailed confirma- tion of the Standard Model (SM). However I have to start with three disclaimers: B Most of the subject is now history, but I am not an historian, I hope the main core will be exact but I may err on some details. • Being an experimentalist, I will mostly focus on the main exper- imental results, giving, when appropriate, some emphasis to the role of well conceived apparatus. This does not mean that I min- imise the key role of theorist, it only reflects the fact that the same story told by a theorist would correspond to another interesting series of lectures. • Finally, in some cases, I may show a bias coming from the fact that I have seen from closer what has happened in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • CERN Courier – Digital Edition Welcome to the Digital Edition of the December 2014 Issue of CERN Courier
    I NTERNATIONAL J OURNAL OF H IGH -E NERGY P HYSICS CERNCOURIER WELCOME V OLUME 5 4 N UMBER 1 0 D ECEMBER 2 0 1 4 CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the December 2014 issue of CERN Courier. As CERN’s 60th-anniversary year comes to an end, CERN Courier gives a voice to some of the organization’s pioneers who are no longer with us. Extracts from audio recordings in CERN’s archives bring to life the spirit of adventure of the early CERN. One of the studies that CERN pioneered was the measurement of the “g-2” parameter of the muon – an experiment that in its latest incarnation is setting up in Fermilab. The year also saw the 50th anniversary of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, and an interview with the centre’s current director reveals interesting similarities and contrasts between the two organizations. The end of the year also offers the traditional seasonal Bookshelf. Happy reading! To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/sign-up. To subscribe to the magazine, the e-mail new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/how-to-subscribe. IceCube: neutrinos and more DETECTORS PEOPLE THE ICTP CUORE: the coldest CERN Council heart in the selects the next AT 50 EDITOR: CHRISTINE SUTTON, CERN known universe director-general An interview with DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY JESSE KARJALAINEN/IOP PUBLISHING, UK p5 p5 Fernando Quevedo p37 CERNCOURIER www. V OLUME 5 4 N UMBER 1 0 D ECEMBER 2 0 1 4 CERN Courier December 2014 High Vacuum Contents Covering current developments in high-energy physics and related fi elds worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to member-state governments, institutes and laboratories Monitoring and Control affi liated with CERN, and to their personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of the W and Z Particles
    June 16, 2015 15:44 60 Years of CERN Experiments and Discoveries – 9.75in x 6.5in b2114-ch06 page 137 The Discovery of the W and Z Particles Luigi Di Lella1 and Carlo Rubbia2 1Physics Department, University of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy [email protected] 2GSSI (Gran Sasso Science Institute), 67100 L’Aquila, Italy [email protected] This article describes the scientific achievements that led to the discovery of the weak intermediate vector bosons, W± and Z, from the original proposal to modify an existing high-energy proton accelerator into a proton–antiproton collider and its implementation at CERN, to the design, construction and operation of the detectors which provided the first evidence for the production and decay of these two fundamental particles. 1. Introduction The first experimental evidence in favour of a unified description of the weak and electromagnetic interactions was obtained in 1973, with the observation of neutrino interactions resulting in final states which could only be explained by assuming that the interaction was mediated by the exchange of a massive, electrically neutral virtual particle.1 Within the framework of the Standard Model, these observations provided a determination of the weak mixing angle, θw, which, despite its large experimental uncertainty, allowed the first quantitative prediction for the mass values of the weak bosons, W± and Z. The numerical values so obtained ranged from 60 to 80 GeV for the W mass, and from 75 to 92 GeV for the Z mass, too large to be accessible by any accelerator in operation at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Physics in the ATLAS Experiment At
    Jet Physics in the ATLAS experiment at LHC Vincenzo Cavasinni on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Dipartimento di fisica `E.Fermi' and INFN Pisa, ITALY E-mail: [email protected] Jet physics represents a powerful tool to investigate the properties of quark and gluon interactions. With the advent of LHC, these studies have been possible at an energy never investigated before. In this proceedings we review the main char- acteristics of jets measured by the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV. The experimental results are compared with the predictions of the Quantum Chromodymamics, QCD, the standard theory of quark-gluon interactions. A good agreement is found between data and QCD predictions. The jet mesurements provide also a clue in the search for new physics: a few examples of searches for excited quarks and supersymmetric particles are presented. 1 Introduction The proton-proton collider LHC started operations at at center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV in 2010. ATLAS, one of the two multipurpose experiments, has collected an integrated luminosity of ≈ 40pb−1 in 2010 and ≈ 5fb−1 in 2011 . Jet production, consequence of the fragmentation of quarks and gluons in hadronic collisions, is the high-pT process with the highest cross section. Their measurement allows a direct access to the elementary interactions between the constituents of the incoming protons. The emergence of jets in hadron collisions has been proved by the UA2 experiment at ATL-PHYS-PROC-2012-152 30 August 2012 the CERN pp¯ Collider in 1983 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Light Gluino Gap Arxiv:1803.01880V1 [Hep-Ph] 5 Mar
    Prepared for submission to JHEP The Light Gluino Gap Jared A. Evansa;b and David McKeenc aDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA bDepartment of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA cPittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: A variety of experimental searches and theoretical efforts have constrained gluinos that undergo an all-hadronic decay with no missing energy, as can arise in R-parity violating or stealth supersymmetry. Although the g~ ! jj decay is robustly excluded, there is gap in current experimental coverage for gluinos with masses between 51–76 GeV that decay into three light-flavor quarks. In this work, we probe this gap with published multi-jet data from the UA2 experiment. Despite setting the strongest current limit on this region, we find that UA2 data is unable to close this gap for g~ ! jjj decays. In addition to this three-jet gap, we note an additional gap for all- hadronic g~ ! n parton decays with n ≥ 4 for light gluinos (51 GeV < mg~ . 300 GeV) not covered by the current search program. arXiv:1803.01880v1 [hep-ph] 5 Mar 2018 Contents 1 Introduction1 2 The UA2 Experiment4 3 Limits on gluinos from multi-jets6 4 Discussion7 1 Introduction The large hadron collider (LHC) has pushed the lower bound on the gluino mass to above 1 TeV for nearly any decay path [1], and for particular decay paths, limits are above 2 TeV; see, e.g., [2].
    [Show full text]
  • FERMILAB New Neutrino Directions
    The HERA electron-proton collider now be­ ing built at the German DESY Laboratory in Hamburg will handle polarized (spin-oriented) electron beams. Here are some of the mova­ ble supports for the complicated spin rotator magnets, which will have to be moved up and down for different beam optics. Except for some minor work, all HERA civil engineering has been completed, and the bill is within one per cent of the original target figure, updated for inflation. FERMILAB New neutrino directions After two successful fixed target Tevatron runs in 1985 and 1987, the present neutrino programme at Fermilab has drawn to a close with the experiments agreeing with each other and with the faithful Standard Model. The long-standing discrepancy in the neutrino-nucleon reaction rate between studies at CERN and Fer­ milab has been resolved. Muon pairs, with each particle carrying the same electric charge, now ap­ pear at the prescribed rate, and the new 1987 data should go on to provide important new information on the quark content (structure functions) of nucleons. Thus it was an appropriate time to review the mented by additional quadrupoles magnet, transferred to the new ring data and examine possibilities for and multipoles. The 317 metre cir­ and accumulated there either in a the future in a 'New Directions in cumference DESY III, designed to single or nine equally spaced 'buck­ Neutrino Physics at Fermilab' meet­ take protons up to about 7.5 GeV, ets'. ing last fall. surrounds the new DESY II ma­ The electrons could then be The meeting got off to a good chine handling HERA electrons and taken up to 14 GeV without loss, start when Fermilab Director Leon positrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Single Diffraction at √S = 630
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH 9 December, 1997 Measurements of Single Diffraction at √s = 630 GeV; Evidence for a Non-Linear α(t) of the omeron P A. Brandt1, S. Erhana, A. Kuzucu2, D. Lynn3, M. Medinnis4, N. Ozdes2, P.E. Schleinb M.T. Zeyrek5, J.G. Zweizig6 University of California∗, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. J.B. Cheze, J. Zsembery Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. (UA8 Collaboration) Abstract We report measurements of the inclusive differential cross section for the single- diffractive reactions: p +p ¯ p + X and p +p ¯ X +p ¯ at √s = 630 GeV, i → f i → f in the momentum transfer range, 0.8 < t < 2.0 GeV2 and final state Feynman- − xp > 0.90. Based on the assumption of factorization, several new features of the omeron Flux Factor are determined from simultaneous fits to our UA8 data and P lower energy data from the CHLM collaboration at the CERN-Intersecting Storage Rings. Prominent among these is that the effective omeron Regge trajectory requires ′′ P − a term quadratic in t, with coefficient, α = 0.079 0.012 GeV 4. We also show that ± the data require a omeron-proton cross section that first decreases with increasing P diffractive mass (corresponding to the term in the triple-Regge expansion) PPR and then increases at larger mass (the term), similar to real particle total arXiv:hep-ex/9710004v3 8 Apr 1998 PPP − cross sections. We measure the product, Kσ = 0.72 0.10 mb GeV 2, where K 0 ± is the normalization constant of the omeron Flux Factor in the proton and σ is P 0 the scale constant in the omeron-proton total cross section.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate Vector Bosons Production and Identification at the CERN Proton-Antiproton Collider G
    europhysics BULLETIN OF THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY news J.A. Volume 14 Number 10 October 1983 Intermediate Vector Bosons Production and Identification at the CERN Proton-Antiproton Collider G. Brianti and E. Gabathuler, Geneva The recent discoveries1) of the massive boson which is exchanged between them is W± and Z° intermediate vector bosons at called the gluon. This massless particle was CERN are a triumph not only for the discovered4) at the PETRA storage ring in electroweak theory2) which gives a stan­ DESY in 1978. The fourth force is the gravi­ dard prescription of how to unify the tational force which holds our Universe electromagnetic and weak interactions, but together. also for the engineers and physicists who The concept of the electroweak interac­ produced and detected pp collisions in the tion is that both the electromagnetic and SPS collider at CERN. weak forces stem from a single "elec­ One of the main achievements of ele­ troweak" force. At very high energies, as mentary particle physics in recent years has for example in the early moments after the been the development of a new class of big bang, the two interactions would be in­ unified theories which describe the forces distinguishable, i.e. the two forces have of nature that appeared up to that time to the same strength, and therefore the be independent of each other. In the in­ photon and the three weak bosons (W+, teractions between elementary particles a W and Z°) form the same family of four force is transmitted between two particles particles. The electroweak theory not only by the exchange of another intermediary requires these four particles but specifies particle, which is referred to as a vector that the W± should be very heavy, ~ 80 boson.
    [Show full text]