A Quarter of a Century Against the Clock

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Quarter of a Century Against the Clock A quarter of a century against the clock 25th anniversary time. Derek Lowenstein (left), chairman of Brookhaven's Alternat­ ing Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) Depart­ ment, presents a backwards-running clock to Ernest Courant, one of the pioneers of the AGS, which produced its first counter­ clockwise protons 25 years ago. Twenty-five years ago, on 17 May 1960, the gleaming new Alternat­ ing Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) at the Brookhaven National Labo­ ratory, New York, got its first taste of protons. But it took a few more months to prepare the radiofre- quency system which transformed the new ring from a toy into the most powerful particle accelerator in the world. On 29 July 1960, protons were whipped through the dreaded phase transition and accelerated to the 30 GeV design energy. The AGS had wrested the high energy crown from CERN's new Proton Synchrotron, which had achieved 24 GeV just five months previously. The AGS was the first proton accelerator project to incorporate from the start the revolutionary idea of strong focusing. In 1952, Brookhaven's Cosmotron, an old- style weak focusing machine, had supplied its first 3 GeV protons - the first time the 1 GeV barrier ward, some outward. in the American Library in Athens. had been breached. The same The initial idea was just to get On a trip to the US in 1952, he year, a group of European ma­ easier access to positive beams, saw the classic strong focusing chine specialists (Edouard Regen- but soon bigger payoffs became paper by Courant, Livingston and streif, Frank Goward, Odd Dahl evident. Collaborator Ernest Cour­ Snyder, and went along to Brook­ and Rolf Wideroe) from the infant ant found that rather than damag­ haven to tell them he had done it CERN came out to see what was ing the proton orbits, the new all before. John Blewett (also part happening. They were toying with idea seemed to improve the fo­ of Livingston's study group) the idea of building a scaled-up cusing. Hartland Snyder recog­ writes 'at first we thought he was version of the Cosmotron as the nized an analogy with optics, a phony but gradually facts first big machine for their new where alternate focusing and de- emerged to support his claim. We Laboratory. focusing lenses of equal strengths changed our minds and offered Cyclotron pioneer Stan Livings­ are focusing, no matter which him a job, which he accepted.' ton organized a study group to comes first. With the stronger fo­ The CERN team, which had un­ consider what advice Brookhaven cusing, magnet apertures could wittingly breathed hard enough could give the Europeans. During be cut from the 8 x 24 inches of down Brookhaven's neck to make the deliberations, Livingston had the Cosmotron down to matchbox Livingston and Co. come out with a brainwave. The Cosmotron size. something special, hurriedly magnets all faced outwards, mak­ (Unknown to the Brookhaven changed the design of their new ing it easy to extract negatively team, this idea had already been machine in midstream. At Brook­ charged particles from a target in developed by a Greek lift engineer haven, Leland Haworth persuaded the machine, but not positive called Nick Christofilos whose the US Atomic Energy Commis­ ones. Livingston's idea was to hobby was particle accelerators sion, very concerned with secret have some magnets facing in­ and who read the Physical Review work in those days, to let Brook- 234 CERN Courier, July/August 1985 haven publish the new ideas, and tery of CP-violation - the cunning J/psi particle and opened the door a modest six-page letter proposed way the neutral kaons break the to charm and more new physics. the building of the machine which rules of conventional physics. In (The J/psi was simultaneously was to become the AGS. (At Cor­ the same year, an AGS experi­ discovered by Burt Richter at nell, the strong focusing tech­ ment led by Nick Sarpios spotted Stanford.) nique was immediately the omega-minus particle, and a Against this impressive list of incorporated into a new electron new way of looking at physics achievements, the CERN PS had synchrotron which began opera­ suddenly clicked into place. only one of sipnilar stature - the tions in 1954.) The CERN team, Thanks to these and other dis­ sighting in 1973 of the neutral lender the direction of the late coveries in the 1960s, Brookhaven current of the weak interaction. Vohn Adams, went on to get their took over from Berkeley as the But by then the PS had embarked proton act together faster than world's premier particle physics on a new career, supplying pro­ Brookhaven. Laboratory. As if to confirm that tons to the big SPS machine built After the suspense of the con­ the initial bumper crop of results alongside. struction race, the AGS and the was no flash in the pan, a 1974 Towards the end of the 1970s, CERN PS machine embarked on experiment led by Sam Ting at a ambitious plans were again being their separate careers. There the more mature AGS discovered the formulated at Brookhaven and story was different. At the AGS in Pioneers of the AGS Brookhaven CERN. At Brookhaven, the AGS 1962, a team led by Mel Schwartz, Alternating Gradient Synchrotron alongside would feed the big ISABELLE pro­ an early scale model which showed the Leon Lederman and Jack Stein- great reduction in AGS magnet aperture ton-proton collider. At CERN, the berger discovered that there were compared to that of the Brookhavep SPS was already operating with Cosmotron thanks to the invention of the two types of neutrino. In 1963, alternating gradient focusing system. From particles from the PS. The plan James Cronin and Val Fitch made left to right are a youthful Ernest Courant, was to adapt the SPS to work as a Stanley Livingston, Hartland Snyder and the AGS beams reveal the mys­ John Blewett. proton-antiproton collider as well as a proton accelerator. While IS­ ABELLE foundered, the CERN project went from success to suc­ cess, achieving in its first years of operation the heady achievements which had been the privilege of the AGS physicists in the early sixties. However the spirit of the AGS physics teams remains indomita­ ble. After 25 years, the machine's physics potential is far from ex­ hausted, and a whole list of im­ provements is being pushed (see next story). Plans for the future Brookhaven is committed to the continuation of its robust high en­ ergy physics programme and to the initiation of a comprehensive fixed target and colliding beam programme for high energy (rela- tivistic) heavy ions. These initia- CERN Courier, July/August 1985 235 tives result from the work of the and detector upgrades. BELLE project. As well as building AGS II Task Force (see June 1984 The other string to Brookha­ the RHIC itself, the AGS would issue, page 194) and other com­ ven's bow is heavy ions. Last have to be adapted for its new mittees. year, work got underway to allow role as the RHIC injector. The immediate particle physics heavy ions to be transferred from However the particle physics plans centre on improvements to the 16 MV tandem Van de Graaff content of the AGS programme is the 25-year old AGS - raising pro­ to the AGS (see December 1984 seen as continuing 'far beyond' ton beam intensities up to 5 x issue, page 433). As well as the the planned advent of the RHIC. 1013 particles per pulse, reliabili­ new transfer beamline, this re­ The AGS is tKe world's richest ties from 75 to 95 per cent, and quires modifications to existing source of kaons, and a pro­ beam duty factors from 25 to 45 beamlines and detectors, as well gramme of kaon physics would per cent; building a new booster as to the AGS itself. Ten weeks of include looking for rare decays to injector; improving beamlines and heavy ion running per year are fo­ test current ideas. Investigations detectors, and capitalizing on the reseen. of CP (charge conjugation/parity) spin physics capabilities which Subsequently, the new AGS violation, seen only in the neutral opened last year (see October booster could be adapted for kaon system, are vital if this long­ 1984 issue, page 328). heavy ion work, while further standing physics mystery is to be After this, a stretcher ring is en­ modifications could allow a wider finally understood. visaged to increase duty factors to range of heavy ions (up to atomic Other AGS particle physics ob­ 90 per cent or more, and power mass 200) to be handled. jectives include the neutrino sec­ supply and radiofrequency im­ For the 1990s, the big Relativis­ tor, where question marks still provements to push intensities up ts Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) could loom as large as ever, spectros­ towards 1014 protons per pulse, be constructed in the tunnel origi­ copy in the 1 - 3 GeV region, together with further beamline nally made for the defunct ISA- where important new information could yet be obtained, and the study of hypernuclei (nuclei with one or more nucleons replaced by heavier particles) to provide an additional lever on particle inter­ actions. With polarized beams available in the AGS, the whole gamut of spin physics opens up. In addition, a new muon storage ring could be built to make even more precise measurements of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon (see September 1984 issue, page 274). Well-wishers crowd the experimental area at the AGS 25th anniversary party. (Photos Brookhaven) 236 CERN Courier, July/August 1985 Around the Laboratories The UA2 experiment at CERN's proton- antiproton Collider - big companion for a series of smaller studies.
Recommended publications
  • PRODUCTION of HIGH MASS Cv and E'e' PAIRS in the UA2
    142 PRODUCTION OF HIGH MASS cv AND e'e' PAIRS IN THE UA2 EXPERIMENT AT THE CERN pp COLLIDER The UA2 Collaboration (Berne, CERN, CopenhagenT Orsay;" Pavía, Sacïay) Dî 84100S6163 presented by J. SCHACHER University of Berne, Switzerland ABSTRACT We present new results on intermediate vector boson production at the CERN pp collider. A comparison is made with the predictions of the standard model of the unified electroweak Glashow-Salam-Weinberg theory. - 143 - 1, INTRODUCTION We report here the results from a search for electrons with > 15 GeV/c produced at the CERN pp collider (Vs = 540 GeV) during its 1982 and 1983 periods of operation. Following a general discussion of the topology of the events containing an electron candidate, we shall compare the data with expectations in the framework of the electroweak standard model [1] for the reactions p + p - W~ + anything (1) - e" • v (?) p • p - Z° + anything (2) -* e* + e" or e* + e" + y where W~ and Z° are the postulated charged and neutral Intermediate Vector Bosonc (IVB), respectively, According to the amount of data collected we are now in the position to study some details of the IVB production, e.g. the influence of emission of gluon radiation on the distribution of the W transverse momentum (Fig.1). Fig.l Typical diagram for W and Z production, taking into account emission of gluon (g) radiation. 7T : parton in p or p. - 144 - Preliminary results from the study reported here have already been presented elsewhere [2] and a more complete discussion can be found in a recent publication [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Fabiola Gianotti
    Fabiola Gianotti Date of Birth 29 October 1960 Place Rome, Italy Nomination 18 August 2020 Field Physics Title Director-General of the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CERN, Geneva Most important awards, prizes and academies Honorary Professor, University of Edinburgh; Corresponding or foreign associate member of the Italian Academy of Sciences (Lincei), the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, the French Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society London, the Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts of Barcelona, the Royal Irish Academy and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Honorary doctoral degrees from: University of Uppsala (2012); Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (2013); McGill University, Montreal (2014); University of Oslo (2014); University of Edinburgh (2015); University of Roma Tor Vergata (2017); University of Chicago (2018); University Federico II, Naples (2018); Université de Paris Sud, Orsay (2018); Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Annecy (2018); Weizmann Institute, Israel (2018); Imperial College, London (2019). National honours: Cavaliere di Gran Croce dell'Ordine al Merito della Repubblica, awarded by the Italian President Giorgio Napolitano (2014). Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics (shared, 2013); Enrico Fermi Prize of the Italian Physical Society (shared, 2013); Medal of Honour of the Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen (2013); Wilhelm Exner Medal, Vienna (2017); Tate Medal of the American Institute of Physics for International Leadership (2019). Summary of scientific research Fabiola Gianotti is a particle physicist working at high-energy accelerators. In her scientific career, she has made significant contributions to several experiments at CERN, including UA2 at the proton-antiproton collider (SpbarpS), ALEPH at the Large Electron-Positron collider (LEP) and ATLAS at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Christofilos and the Astron Project in America's Fusion Program
    Elisheva Coleman May 4, 2004 Spring Junior Paper Advisor: Professor Mahoney Greek Fire: Nicholas Christofilos and the Astron Project in America’s Fusion Program This paper represents my own work in accordance with University regulations The author thanks the Program in Plasma Science and Technology and the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory for their support. Introduction The second largest building on the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s campus today stands essentially abandoned, used as a warehouse for odds and ends. Concrete, starkly rectangular and nondescript, Building 431 was home for over a decade to the Astron machine, the testing device for a controlled fusion reactor scheme devised by a virtually unknown engineer-turned-physicist named Nicholas C. Christofilos. Building 431 was originally constructed in the late 1940s before the Lawrence laboratory even existed, for the Materials Testing Accelerator (MTA), the first experiment performed at the Livermore site.1 By the time the MTA was retired in 1955, the Livermore lab had grown up around it, a huge, nationally funded institution devoted to four projects: magnetic fusion, diagnostic weapon experiments, the design of thermonuclear weapons, and a basic physics program.2 When the MTA shut down, its building was turned over to the lab’s controlled fusion department. A number of fusion experiments were conducted within its walls, but from the early sixties onward Astron predominated, and in 1968 a major extension was added to the building to accommodate a revamped and enlarged Astron accelerator. As did much material within the national lab infrastructure, the building continued to be recycled. After Astron’s termination in 1973 the extension housed the Experimental Test Accelerator (ETA), a prototype for a huge linear induction accelerator, the type of accelerator first developed for Astron.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Model and Measurements of Its Parameters (Like the Mass of the Top Quark) at Hadron Colliders Are Presented
    Title: Physics at Hadron Colliders Lecturer: Dr Karl Jakobs Date and Times: 1st August at 11:15 2nd August at 10:15 3rd August at 10:15 3rd August at 11:15 Summary of the proposed talk: Present and future hadron colliders play an important role in the investigation of fundamental questions of particle physics. After an introductory lecture, tests of the Standard Model and measurements of its parameters (like the mass of the top quark) at hadron colliders are presented. In addition, it will be discussed how the Higgs boson can be searched for at hadron colliders and how "New Physics", i.e. physics beyond the Standard Model, can be explored. Results are presented from the currently ongoing run at the Tevatron proton antiproton collider at the US research lab Fermilab. In addition, the rich physics potential of the experiments at the CERN Large Hadron Collider is discussed. Prerequisite knowledge and references: - The Standard Model (Lecture by A. Pich) - Beyond the Standard Model (Lecture by E. Kiritsis) Biography- Brief CV: Dr Karl JAKOBS -Studied Physics at the University of Bonn, Germany - Summer student at CERN in 1984 - PhD at the University of Heidelberg, in 1988 Thesis on the UA2-Experiment at the CERN Proton-Antiproton Collider (already Hadron Collider physics at that time) - Fellow and staff position at CERN, UA2 experiment - 1992 - 1996 Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich ALEPH and ATLAS experiments - 1996 - 2003 Prof. of physics at the University of Mainz ALEPH and ATLAS experiments - Since 2000: participation in the D0-Experiment at the Tevatron HR-RFA 07/06 - Since 2003: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiprotons in the Big Machine
    Antiprotons in the big machine Right the beam line which injects 26 GeV antiprotons into the SPS. Centre, the beam fine which sends high energy protons from the SPS towards the West Experimental Area. The main ring is on the left. (Photo CERN 38.4.81) On 7 July a pulse of antiprotons was sent to the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron, accelerated to 270 GeV and (briefly) stored. Two days later the exercise was repeated with greater success and the first evi­ dence obtained for proton-antipro­ ton collisions at 540 GeV — by far the highest collision energies ever achieved. Although there is still much to be done before the scheme becomes fully operational, this achievement is a major milestone in the CERN antiproton story. The origins of the project Antiprotons, since they presuma­ bly have the same properties as protons except for the sign of their electric charge, can be accelerated and stored in the same magnet ring as protons. Thus colliding beam sys­ tems, like the familiar electron-posi­ tron machines, are, in principle, fea­ sible. However until recently it was not possible to produce antiproton tion, the antiprotons emerge with a for colliding beam physics. It in­ beams of sufficient intensity and wide range of momenta, distinctly volves using electron beams travel­ density to give sufficient collisions in unsuitable for a magnet system in a ling along with the antiproton beam a reasonable enough time for useful beam transfer line, an accelerator or at the same velocity. The electron physics to be done. a storage ring which is designed to beam, which is much easier to con­ This situation has changed with handle a well defined particle mo­ trol, has particles at precisely the the invention of 'beam cooling'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model 30 Years of Glory
    FR0107537 LAX66-128 March 2001 The Standard Model 30 Years of Glory Jacques Lefrangois Laboratoire de l'Accelerateur Lineaire IN2P3-CNRS et Universite de Paris-Sud, BP 34, F-91898 Orsay Cedex Lectures given at the 11th Advanced Study Institute on Techniques and Concepts in High Energy Physics, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, USA, June 15-26, 2000 U.E.R Institut National de de Physique Nucleaire 1'Universite Paris-Sud et de Physique des Particules 5 2/ § 8 B.P. 34 ~ Bailment 200 ~ 91898 ORSAY CEDEX LAL 00-128 March 2001 Doc. Enreg. ie. THE STANDARD MODEL 30 YEARS OF GLORY Jacques Lefrangois Laboratoire de VAccelerateur Lineaire IN2P3-CNRS et Universite PARIS-SUD Centre Scientifique d'Orsay - Bat. 200 - B.P. 34 91898 ORSAY Cedex (France) [email protected] In these three lectures, I will try to give a flavour of the achievements of the past 30 years, which saw the birth, and the detailed confirma- tion of the Standard Model (SM). However I have to start with three disclaimers: B Most of the subject is now history, but I am not an historian, I hope the main core will be exact but I may err on some details. • Being an experimentalist, I will mostly focus on the main exper- imental results, giving, when appropriate, some emphasis to the role of well conceived apparatus. This does not mean that I min- imise the key role of theorist, it only reflects the fact that the same story told by a theorist would correspond to another interesting series of lectures. • Finally, in some cases, I may show a bias coming from the fact that I have seen from closer what has happened in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • CERN Courier – Digital Edition Welcome to the Digital Edition of the December 2014 Issue of CERN Courier
    I NTERNATIONAL J OURNAL OF H IGH -E NERGY P HYSICS CERNCOURIER WELCOME V OLUME 5 4 N UMBER 1 0 D ECEMBER 2 0 1 4 CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the December 2014 issue of CERN Courier. As CERN’s 60th-anniversary year comes to an end, CERN Courier gives a voice to some of the organization’s pioneers who are no longer with us. Extracts from audio recordings in CERN’s archives bring to life the spirit of adventure of the early CERN. One of the studies that CERN pioneered was the measurement of the “g-2” parameter of the muon – an experiment that in its latest incarnation is setting up in Fermilab. The year also saw the 50th anniversary of the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, and an interview with the centre’s current director reveals interesting similarities and contrasts between the two organizations. The end of the year also offers the traditional seasonal Bookshelf. Happy reading! To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/sign-up. To subscribe to the magazine, the e-mail new-issue alert, please visit: http://cerncourier.com/cws/how-to-subscribe. IceCube: neutrinos and more DETECTORS PEOPLE THE ICTP CUORE: the coldest CERN Council heart in the selects the next AT 50 EDITOR: CHRISTINE SUTTON, CERN known universe director-general An interview with DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY JESSE KARJALAINEN/IOP PUBLISHING, UK p5 p5 Fernando Quevedo p37 CERNCOURIER www. V OLUME 5 4 N UMBER 1 0 D ECEMBER 2 0 1 4 CERN Courier December 2014 High Vacuum Contents Covering current developments in high-energy physics and related fi elds worldwide CERN Courier is distributed to member-state governments, institutes and laboratories Monitoring and Control affi liated with CERN, and to their personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discovery of the W and Z Particles
    June 16, 2015 15:44 60 Years of CERN Experiments and Discoveries – 9.75in x 6.5in b2114-ch06 page 137 The Discovery of the W and Z Particles Luigi Di Lella1 and Carlo Rubbia2 1Physics Department, University of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy [email protected] 2GSSI (Gran Sasso Science Institute), 67100 L’Aquila, Italy [email protected] This article describes the scientific achievements that led to the discovery of the weak intermediate vector bosons, W± and Z, from the original proposal to modify an existing high-energy proton accelerator into a proton–antiproton collider and its implementation at CERN, to the design, construction and operation of the detectors which provided the first evidence for the production and decay of these two fundamental particles. 1. Introduction The first experimental evidence in favour of a unified description of the weak and electromagnetic interactions was obtained in 1973, with the observation of neutrino interactions resulting in final states which could only be explained by assuming that the interaction was mediated by the exchange of a massive, electrically neutral virtual particle.1 Within the framework of the Standard Model, these observations provided a determination of the weak mixing angle, θw, which, despite its large experimental uncertainty, allowed the first quantitative prediction for the mass values of the weak bosons, W± and Z. The numerical values so obtained ranged from 60 to 80 GeV for the W mass, and from 75 to 92 GeV for the Z mass, too large to be accessible by any accelerator in operation at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Physics in the ATLAS Experiment At
    Jet Physics in the ATLAS experiment at LHC Vincenzo Cavasinni on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Dipartimento di fisica `E.Fermi' and INFN Pisa, ITALY E-mail: [email protected] Jet physics represents a powerful tool to investigate the properties of quark and gluon interactions. With the advent of LHC, these studies have been possible at an energy never investigated before. In this proceedings we review the main char- acteristics of jets measured by the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV. The experimental results are compared with the predictions of the Quantum Chromodymamics, QCD, the standard theory of quark-gluon interactions. A good agreement is found between data and QCD predictions. The jet mesurements provide also a clue in the search for new physics: a few examples of searches for excited quarks and supersymmetric particles are presented. 1 Introduction The proton-proton collider LHC started operations at at center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV in 2010. ATLAS, one of the two multipurpose experiments, has collected an integrated luminosity of ≈ 40pb−1 in 2010 and ≈ 5fb−1 in 2011 . Jet production, consequence of the fragmentation of quarks and gluons in hadronic collisions, is the high-pT process with the highest cross section. Their measurement allows a direct access to the elementary interactions between the constituents of the incoming protons. The emergence of jets in hadron collisions has been proved by the UA2 experiment at ATL-PHYS-PROC-2012-152 30 August 2012 the CERN pp¯ Collider in 1983 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Light Gluino Gap Arxiv:1803.01880V1 [Hep-Ph] 5 Mar
    Prepared for submission to JHEP The Light Gluino Gap Jared A. Evansa;b and David McKeenc aDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA bDepartment of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA cPittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: A variety of experimental searches and theoretical efforts have constrained gluinos that undergo an all-hadronic decay with no missing energy, as can arise in R-parity violating or stealth supersymmetry. Although the g~ ! jj decay is robustly excluded, there is gap in current experimental coverage for gluinos with masses between 51–76 GeV that decay into three light-flavor quarks. In this work, we probe this gap with published multi-jet data from the UA2 experiment. Despite setting the strongest current limit on this region, we find that UA2 data is unable to close this gap for g~ ! jjj decays. In addition to this three-jet gap, we note an additional gap for all- hadronic g~ ! n parton decays with n ≥ 4 for light gluinos (51 GeV < mg~ . 300 GeV) not covered by the current search program. arXiv:1803.01880v1 [hep-ph] 5 Mar 2018 Contents 1 Introduction1 2 The UA2 Experiment4 3 Limits on gluinos from multi-jets6 4 Discussion7 1 Introduction The large hadron collider (LHC) has pushed the lower bound on the gluino mass to above 1 TeV for nearly any decay path [1], and for particular decay paths, limits are above 2 TeV; see, e.g., [2].
    [Show full text]
  • N.Y. 11F73 INS Mcsnff IS Wum\I I EDITOR's FOREWORD
    BNL 51377 MOOKHAVfN NATIONAL LAKMtATORY IRC* N.Y. 11f73 INS MCSNff IS WUm\i i EDITOR'S FOREWORD The planning and organization of this celebration was done by John Blewett, Ted Kycia, Vinnie LoDestro, Lyle Smith and Carl Thien, under the general direction of Ronald Rau and with the invaluable assistance of Kit D'Ambrosio. The logo which graces the cover of these symposium proceedings was de- signed by Per Dahl. The job of transcribing the tapes was done by Anna Kissel, and it was often a challenging one! I am to blame for the editing, which I hope has not distorted history too much. Joyce Ricciardelli has very ably produced the final manuscript and seen it through the complex process of publica- tion. All of us took pleasure and pride in celebrating the AGS and in putting this book together, and we hope you enjoy it. - iii - Preface On March 17, 1960, a beam was first introduced into the newly constructed Brookhaven Alternating Gradient Synchrotron. On March 26, a hundred turns of circulation were achieved, and on July 29 the beam WJS first accelerated to the design energy of 30 GeV. Thus, hewever one defines the exact start of life during the series of steps by which a new accelerator is made operational, the year 1960 marks the start-up of the AGS, and in 1980 we cele- brate the twentieth anniversary of that event. The AGS, together with the newly functioning PS at CERN, carried particle physics into a new world of higher energies and unanticipated discoveries. The AGS and the PS both embodied the new principle of strong focusing and demonstrated that, with its aid, a new era of particle accelerators haJ opened.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Single Diffraction at √S = 630
    EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH 9 December, 1997 Measurements of Single Diffraction at √s = 630 GeV; Evidence for a Non-Linear α(t) of the omeron P A. Brandt1, S. Erhana, A. Kuzucu2, D. Lynn3, M. Medinnis4, N. Ozdes2, P.E. Schleinb M.T. Zeyrek5, J.G. Zweizig6 University of California∗, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA. J.B. Cheze, J. Zsembery Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. (UA8 Collaboration) Abstract We report measurements of the inclusive differential cross section for the single- diffractive reactions: p +p ¯ p + X and p +p ¯ X +p ¯ at √s = 630 GeV, i → f i → f in the momentum transfer range, 0.8 < t < 2.0 GeV2 and final state Feynman- − xp > 0.90. Based on the assumption of factorization, several new features of the omeron Flux Factor are determined from simultaneous fits to our UA8 data and P lower energy data from the CHLM collaboration at the CERN-Intersecting Storage Rings. Prominent among these is that the effective omeron Regge trajectory requires ′′ P − a term quadratic in t, with coefficient, α = 0.079 0.012 GeV 4. We also show that ± the data require a omeron-proton cross section that first decreases with increasing P diffractive mass (corresponding to the term in the triple-Regge expansion) PPR and then increases at larger mass (the term), similar to real particle total arXiv:hep-ex/9710004v3 8 Apr 1998 PPP − cross sections. We measure the product, Kσ = 0.72 0.10 mb GeV 2, where K 0 ± is the normalization constant of the omeron Flux Factor in the proton and σ is P 0 the scale constant in the omeron-proton total cross section.
    [Show full text]