Proportionality and the United Kingdom's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proportionality and the United Kingdom's Proportionality and The United Kingdom’s policy on Nationality Deprivation as a Counter-Terrorism Measure: A Case for Concern International Law and Global Governance – Master Thesis Name: Emma Tuininga Student no.: 699086/u1276440 Date: 14/08/2019 Supervisor: Dr. Laura van Waas Abstract Nationality deprivation has gradually become an essential tool to many Western states in their fight against terrorism. Where most policies contain a prohibition on statelessness, the United Kingdom has recently introduced the power to strip a naturalized national of their citizenship, if it is reasonably believed they have access to another one. This has the possibility to set a dangerous precedent, one which cannot escape scrutiny. The principle of proportionality is a way to keep ‘check’ of such policies, holding the state accountable to their international human rights obligations. This thesis will consider proportionality in the United Kingdom’s policy, through the question: To what extent do the United Kingdom policies on counter- terrorism, especially on the deprivation of nationality of those who are, or are suspected to be, involved with terrorism, breach the (international) principle of proportionality? A proportionality test informed by Aharon Barak’s ‘four-stage test’ of (1) proper purpose, (2) rational connection (3) necessity and (4) proportionality stricto sensu applied to the United Kingdom’s nationality deprivation policy will uncover a case for concern, especially to international human rights law. Comparing it to the other counter-terrorism measures of Temporary Exclusion Orders (TEOs) and the confiscation of an individual’s passport, nationality deprivation will reveal itself to be a distinctive and invasive measure, encroaching upon the basic human rights of an individual. Key words: proportionality, nationality deprivation, United Kingdom, counter-terrorism measures, statelessness - 2 - Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................... - 2 - 1.0 Chapter I: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... - 5 - 1.1 Methodology..................................................................................................................................... - 9 - 1.2 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................ - 9 - 2.0 Chapter II: International Law, the Principle of Proportionality and its Constrains on Counter Terrorism Measures .................................................................................................................................................. - 11 - 2.1 The General Principle of Proportionality in (International) Law ........................................................ - 11 - 2.2 Barak’s Four Components of Proportionality .................................................................................... - 12 - 2.3 Proportionality and Human Rights ................................................................................................... - 13 - 2.3.1 Proportionality and Nationality Deprivation ............................................................................. - 14 - 2.3.2 Proportionality, Counter-Terrorism and Nationality Deprivation ............................................... - 16 - 3.0 Chapter III: The United Kingdom’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy ............................................................. - 18 - 3.1 A Short History of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Measures in the United Kingdom .................... - 18 - 3.2 CONTEST: United Kingdom’s Counter-Terrorism Measures .............................................................. - 19 - 3.2.1 The United Kingdom’s Policy on Nationality Deprivation........................................................... - 21 - 3.2.2 Counter-Terrorism Security Act 2015: Temporary Exclusion Orders (TEOs) and Passport Confiscation ..................................................................................................................................... - 25 - 3.3 Trends in the United Kingdom’s Approach to Counter-Terrorism ..................................................... - 27 - 4.0 Chapter IV: The United Kingdom’s Counter-Terrorism Measures, Nationality Deprivation and Proportionality .......................................................................................................................................... - 29 - 4.1 The United Kingdom’s policy on Nationality Deprivation: Is it Proportional? ..................................... - 29 - 4.1.1 Proportionality and the Right to Nationality: A Lack of Response by the Court’s to the United Kingdom’s Counter-Terrorism on Nationality Deprivation. ................................................................ - 35 - - 3 - 4.2 Nationality Deprivation and Proportionality: A Distinct Counter-Terrorism Measure ........................ - 36 - 4.3 Proportionality, Counter-Terrorism and its Challenges ..................................................................... - 38 - 5.0 Chapter V: Discussion and Conclusion .................................................................................................. - 40 - 5.1 The United Kingdom, Nationality Deprivation and Proportionality: A Case for Concern .................... - 40 - 5.2 The United Kingdom’s Policy on Nationality Deprivation: General Observations ............................... - 41 - 5.2.1 Nationality Deprivation, Terrorism and Statelessness: A Warning for the Future ....................... - 41 - 5.2.2 Nationality Deprivation in Europe: An Ineffective Tool to Fight Terrorism ................................. - 43 - 5.3 Future Research: Areas that Warrant Further Attention ................................................................... - 43 - Bibliography .............................................................................................................................................. - 47 - - 4 - 1.0 Chapter I: Introduction “And if human rights laws stop us from doing it, we will change those laws so we can do it,” Theresa May, General Election 2017.1 In 2015, Shamima Begum and two other British teenage girls travelled to Islamic State territory in Syria. Four years later, now 19-years old, Begum found herself in a refugee camp, looking to return to the United Kingdom. On February 19, 2019, the then Home Secretary Sajid Javid responded by depriving her of her British nationality, stating that she would be able to claim Bangladeshi nationality through her parents.2 Bangladesh, however, has said that Begum is not considered a national of the country, making her effectively stateless.3 Issues about the legality of such a decision were quickly raised, questioning whether it met the standards set out in British nationality laws, as well as international law obligations. Begum is not the only UK citizen who has received a nationality deprivation order from the Home Secretary. Since 2010, more than 150 people had seen their nationality stripped away from them on the grounds of terrorism, with 104 losing their citizenship in 2017 alone.4 Begum and the other cases are part of a larger discourse held in many Western states on terrorism and the deprivation of nationality as one of the ways to counter this threat. On September 11, 2001, the terrorist attacks in New York caused great devastation across the city and across the United States. Although, terrorism had known many faces over the years, 1 As cited by Rowena Mason and Vikram Dodd, “May: I’ll rip up human rights laws that impede new terror legislation,” The Guardian, 6 June 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/06/theresa-may-rip- up-human-rights-laws-impede-new-terror-legislation 2 Kevin Rawlinson and Vikram Dodd, “Shamima Begum: Isis Briton faces move to revoke citizenship,” The Guardian, February 19, 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/feb/19/isis-briton-shamima-begum- to-have-uk-citizenship-revoked 3 Esther Addley and Redwan Ahmed, “Shamima Begum will not be allowed here, says Bangladesh,” The Guardian, February 20, 2019 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/feb/20/rights-of-shamima- begums-son-not-affected-says-javid 4 Lizzle Dearden, “Shamima Begum: Number of people stripped of UK citizenship soars by 600% in a year,” The Independent, February 20, 2019 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/shamima-begum-uk- citizenship-stripped-home-office-sajid-javid-a8788301.html - 5 - this day had instilled a new wave of fear in Western states, perceived it as an “attack on civilization.”5 Rigorous counter-terrorism measures were developed as a part of the response, so too in the United Kingdom. The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act in 2001, for example, provided for certain liberties on detention of a suspected terrorist.6 Although, this Act has partly been repealed over the last two decades,7 it did serve, like in many other countries, as a jump-off point towards stricter and more comprehensive anti-terrorism legislation. As new threats such as the Islamic State started to emerge and radicalization and support for terrorist organizations significantly increased,8 countries sought to further their powers to deal with the threat of terrorism. Following 2001, the United Kingdom introduced a string of Acts and established counter-terrorism measures such as a Temporary Exclusion
Recommended publications
  • The ISIS Bride
    American University National Security Law Brief Volume 11 Issue 2 Article 4 2021 The Right of Return: The ISIS Bride Casey Hare-Osifchin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/nslb Part of the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Casey Hare-Osifchin "The Right of Return: The ISIS Bride," American University National Security Law Brief, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2021). Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/nslb/vol11/iss2/4 This Response or Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University National Security Law Brief by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Right of Return: The ISIS Bride Casey Hare-Osifchin* ABSTRACT With the migration of Westerners to fight as a part of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (“ISIS” or “ISIL”), there is an often-overlooked group of others who flock to the region in order to do what they consider to be their part. This is a group comprised of women, often extremely young, some even minors, who have felt compelled to fulfill their perceived duty to the Caliphate. They are usually branded ISIS brides. These girls and women are frequently radicalized online, and they subsequently travel to war-torn areas to be married to a member of ISIS and provide children for the Caliphate.
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Benefits and Reservation Wages: Key Elasticities from a Stripped-Down Job Search Approach
    Estudos e Documentos de Trabalho Working Papers 3 | 2008 UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND RESERVATION WAGES: KEY ELASTICITIES FROM A STRIPPED-DOWN JOB SEARCH APPROACH John T. Addison Mário Centeno Pedro Portugal February 2008 The analyses, opinions and findings of these papers represent the views of the authors, they are not necessarily those of the Banco de Portugal. Please address correspondence to Pedro Portugal Economics and Research Department Banco de Portugal, Av. Almirante Reis no. 71, 1150-012 Lisboa, Portugal; Tel.: 351 213 138 410, Email: [email protected] BANCO DE PORTUGAL Economics and Research Department Av. Almirante Reis, 71-6th floor 1150-012 Lisboa www.bportugal.pt Printed and distributed by Administrative Services Department Av. Almirante Reis, 71-2nd floor 1150-012 Lisboa Number of copies printed 170 issues Legal Deposit no. 3664/83 ISSN 0870-0117 ISBN Unemployment Benefits and Reservation Wages: Key Elasticities from a Stripped-Down Job Search Approach By John T. Addison†,M´ario Centeno‡ and Pedro Portugal§ †Queen’s University Belfast and University of South Carolina ‡Banco de Portugal and Universidade T´ecnica de Lisboa §Banco de Portugal and Universidade NOVA de Lisboa This Version: February 2008 Abstract This paper exploits survey information on reservation wages and data on actual wages from the European Community Household Panel to deduce in the manner of Lancaster and Chesher (1983) additional parameters of a stylized structural search model; specifically, reservation wage and transition/duration elasticities. The informational requirements of this approach are minimal, thereby facilitating comparisons between countries. Further, its policy content is immediate insofar as the impact of unemployment benefit rules and measures increasing the arrival rate of job offers are concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nick Jones – Winning Entry
    Graham Turnbull essay competition 2019 Has the rule of law been replaced by the rule of politics? Nick Jones – winning entry Introduction Throughout his 2019 Reith Lectures, Jonathan Sumption advanced a case for the re- emergence of the political sphere, as a remedy to a British judicial system which has come to claim a “wider supervisory authority over other organs of the State.”1 Crucially, he placed legitimacy – “a vital but elusive concept […which] is still the basis of all consent”2 – at the very heart of his analysis. It is precisely the democratic legitimacy inherent to politics, he argued, that renders it a more appropriate decision-making vehicle than legal adjudication, particularly in the field of human rights. Whether Lord Sumption is correct on this latter point is not the primary focus of this essay (several substantive critiques have already emerged, including from his former Supreme Court colleague, Baroness Hale).3 However, his notion of legitimacy is absolutely central to conflicts between the “rule of the law” and the “rule of politics”, begging the question: what happens when they collide? This essay will seek to unravel this tension by arguing that the two concepts necessarily co-exist and, increasingly, conflict with one another. Far from being mutually exclusive, these two sources of legitimacy offer competing frames of reference justifying both governance, and the conferral or revocation of rights. Indeed, there is politics, on the one hand, and law, on the other: the key question is discerning which one “rules” when each is claimed as justification for opposing outcomes. Conceptual definitions Although thinkers from all standpoints have lauded the rule of law as a central tenet underpinning the liberal democratic model, a commonly held definition remains elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Till Martyrdom Do Us Part': Gender and the ISIS Phenomenon
    ‘Till Martyrdom Do Us Part’ Gender and the ISIS Phenomenon erin marie saltman melanie smith About this paper This report represents the second publication in ISD’s Women and Extremism (WaE) programme, launched in January 2015 to fill a large blind spot in the evolution of the global extremist threat. This report also builds upon ICSR’s research into the foreign fighter phenomenonlxviii. Questions are now being posed as to how and why females are being recruited, what role they play within violent extremist organizations, and what tools will best work to counter this new threat. Yet very little work has been done to not only answer these questions but to build sustainable preventative measures. WaE serves to pioneer new research, develop global networks, seed local initiatives, and influence social media, in-line with work already being piloted by the ISD. About the authors Dr. Erin Marie Saltman is a Senior Researcher at ISD overseeing research and project development on Women and Extremism (WaE). WaE aims to fully analyse the radicalisation processes of women into violent extremist networks as well as increase the role women play in countering extremism. Erin’s background includes research and analysis work on both far-right and Islamist processes of radicalisation, political socialization and counter-extremism programmes. She regularly advises governments and security sectors across Europe and North America on issues related to online extremism and the role of the internet in radicalisation. Erin holds a PhD in political science from University College London. Melanie Smith is a Research Associate working on ISD’s WaE programme.
    [Show full text]
  • A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Map .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions of Apartheid and Persecution .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Girls to Women
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IRELAND, GALWAY European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2018/2019 From Girls to Women Are (Minor) Female Foreign Fighters Child Soldiers or Jihadi Terrorist Brides? (A Legal Analysis of the United Kingdom’s and Aus- tria’s State Responses to this Phenomenon) Author: Mag. Tamara Siwczyk Supervisor: Dr. Kathleen Cavanaugh 1 Title: From Girls to Women Are (Minor) Female Foreign Fighters Child Soldiers or Jihadi Terrorist Brides? (A Legal Analysis of the United Kingdom’s and Austria’s State Responses to this Phenom- enon) Author: Mag. Tamara Siwczyk Course title: LLM in Human Rights and Democratisation Institution: Irish Centre for Human Rights National University of Ireland, Galway - NUI Galway Date: July 2019 Word Count: 27,058 Head of the Irish Centre for Human Rights: Prof. Siobhan Mullally Thesis supervisor: Dr. Kathleen Cavanaugh 2 Table of Content 1. Introduction 2. Historical and Political Backdrop to the Phenomenon of Foreign Fighters 2.1. Foreign Fighters in the Context of the Syrian Civil War 2.2. Inconsistent Terminology of the Phenomenon of Foreign Fighters 2.3. Numbers and Statistics of Foreign Fighters 2.4. The (Lack of) Gender Perspective on the Foreign Fighters Phenomenon 2.4.1. Female Foreign Fighters - Who are They and Why Do They Go? 2.4.2. ISIS’ Social Media Campaign and Gender-Tailored Approach to Attract Female Foreign Fighters 2.5. Children Foreign Fighters and the Cubs of the Caliphate - Who are the Children of ISIS and Why Do They Go? 2.5.1. Legal and Political Backdrop to the Classification of the Ongoing Conflict in Syria, Iraq and the Islamic State 2.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizenship Hook: Obligations to British and French Foreign Fighters Under the European Convention on Human Rights
    Cite as Molinaro, 11 J. NAT’L SECURITY L. & POL’Y __ (forthcoming 2021) The Citizenship Hook: Obligations to British and French Foreign Fighters Under the European Convention on Human Rights Nicole E. Molinaro* INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 I. DOMESTIC LEGAL REGIMES…………………………………………………………... 3 A. The United Kingdom …………………………………………………………….. 4 1. Temporary Exclusion Orders ………………………………………….. 5 2. Denaturalization ……………………………………………………..… 6 B. France ……………………………………………………..…………………..… 8 II. THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS – FUNDAMENTAL PROTECTIONS………………………………………………………. 10 A. The Right to Life ……………………………………………………………..… 10 1. Article 2: The Right to Life ………………………………………….. 10 2. Protocol Nos. 6 and 13: The Death Penalty………………………...… 11 B. Article 3: Prohibition of Torture, Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment………………………………………………………….... 12 III. EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS………………………………………………………………….. 14 A. Current Bases for Extraterritorial Jurisdiction………………………………… 14 1. Violations by State Parties Outside of Their Territory……………….. 15 2. Risk of Violations by Third Parties ……………………………….…. 16 B. The Case for Extraterritorial Jurisdiction over French and British Foreign Fighters ……………………………………………………….. 17 1. French Foreign Fighters ……………………………………………… 18 2. British Foreign Fighters ……………………………………………… 20 IV. ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL 4: EXPANDING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION FOR NATIONALS …………………………………………………………………………. 20 A. Article 3 of Additional Protocol No. 4: Prohibition of Expulsion
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the United Nations Special Rapporteur On
    Submission to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences in response to call for inputs on “The Nexus between Forced Displacement and Contemporary Forms of Slavery” ABOUT REPRIEVE Reprieve is a charitable organization registered in the United Kingdom (No. 1114900), and in special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Reprieve provides free legal and investigative support to individuals who have been subjected to state-sponsored human rights abuses. Our clients belong to some of the most vulnerable populations in the world, as it is in their cases that human rights are most swiftly jettisoned, and the rule of law is cast aside. In particular, we protect the rights oF those Facing the death penalty and deliver justice to victims oF arbitrary detention, torture, and extrajudicial execution. SUMMARY Drawing on empirical research including Field reports and qualitative interviews, this submission presents evidence that British nationals held in Kurdish-run displacement camps in North East Syria (NES), the majority of whom are children, are at risk of slavery, trafficking and other forms of exploitation. This risk is exacerbated by UK policies towards its nationals in NES, namely the reFusal to repatriate or provide consular assistance, in addition to the government’s draconian use of citizenship deprivations. This submission will also reFlect on the gendered nature oF these policies and how British women in these displacement camps, many oF whom are survivors oF sex traFFicking, are at a pronounced and imminent risk of modern slavery. We conclude by offering recommendations on how the UK government can protect displaced persons in NES from contemporary forms of slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.11 Isis Teen Bride
    FRIDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2019 THEDAY.CO.UK ISIS teen bride begs for return to Britain Should she be allowed back? Four years ago, Shamima Begum fled Britain to join Islamic State. Now, with the caliphate in ruins, she wants to return. Her plea has caused division and uproar. Exodus:: Shamima Begum is one of 150 women and children to leave Britain for ISIS. “I’m not the same silly little 15-year-old saw my first severed head in a bin it didn’t faze 26-year-old Tareena Shaki became the first schoolgirl who ran away from Bethnal Green me at all. It was from a captured fighter seized British woman to be imprisoned after returning four years ago,” claims Shamima Begum — one on the battlefield, an enemy of Islam.” from Islamic State. of three schoolgirls who left their families in Around 850 people fled Britain to join up Should Shamima Begum be allowed to East London to join Islamic State (ISIS) in with the caliphate, including 150 women and return to Britain? 2015. children. Many died, but those who want to Now, with ISIS strongholds destroyed, and return present a dilemma for authorities. Homecomiing the terrorist group all but defeated, she wants “I’m not putting at risk British people’s lives This would be extremely controversial. Having to return to Britain. to go and look for terrorists or former terrorists chosen to renounce Britain for ISIS, many claim “The caliphate is over,” she told Anthony in a failed state,” declared security minister she must live with her choice — particularly Loyd — a Times journalist who found her in a Ben Wallace, saying that “actions have given her lack of regret.
    [Show full text]
  • First Name Last Name Title Company Country Anouk Florencia Aaron Warner Bros
    First Name Last Name Title Company Country Anouk Florencia Aaron Warner Bros. International Television United States Carlos Abascal Director, Ole Communications Ole Communications United States Kelly Abcarian SVP, Product Leadership Nielsen United States Mike Abend Director, Business Development New Form Digital United States Friday Abernethy SVP, Content Distribution Univision Communications Inc United States Jack Abernethy Twentieth Television United States Salua Abisambra Manager Salabi Colombia Rafael Aboy Account Executive Newsline Report Argentina Cori Abraham SVP of Development and International Oxygen Network United States Mo Abraham Camera Man VIP Television United States Cris Abrego Endemol Shine Group Netherlands Cris Abrego Chairman, Endemol Shine Americas and CEO, Endemol Shine North EndemolAmerica Shine North America United States Steve Abrego Endemol Shine North America United States Patrícia Abreu Dirctor Upstar Comunicações SA Portugal Manuel Abud TV Azteca SAB de CV Mexico Rafael Abudo VIP 2000 TV United States Abraham Aburman LIVE IT PRODUCTIONS Francine Acevedo NATPE United States Hulda Acevedo Programming Acquisitions Executive A+E Networks Latin America United States Kristine Acevedo All3Media International Ric Acevedo Executive Producer North Atlantic Media LLC United States Ronald Acha Univision United States David Acosta Senior Vice President City National Bank United States Jorge Acosta General Manager NTC TV Colombia Juan Acosta EVP, COO Viacom International Media Networks United States Mauricio Acosta President and CEO MAZDOC Colombia Raul Acosta CEO Global Media Federation United States Viviana Acosta-Rubio Telemundo Internacional United States Camilo Acuña Caracol Internacional Colombia Andrea Adams Director of Sales FilmTrack United States Barbara Adams Founder Broken To Reign TV United States Robin C. Adams Executive In Charge of Content and Production Endavo Media and Communications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Unequal Citizenship and Subjecthood: a Rose by Any Other Name..?
    Prabhat, D. (2020). Unequal Citizenship and Subjecthood: A rose by any other name..? . Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 71(2). https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/321 Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Queen's University Belfast at https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/321. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Unequal Citizenship and Subjecthood: A rose by any other name..? 1 Devyani Prabhat University of Bristol Abstract British Citizenship is facing significant contemporary challenges in terms of failure to include ethnic minority citizens in an equal manner within the legal rights and protection of citizenship. Some examples of such failure are the hostile environment laws which have resulted in discrimination and deportation of citizens, new hurdles in becoming a citizen, and cancellation laws for conduct which have affect citizens with migrant connections more than those born British and holding only British nationality. This paper investigates why such legal inequalities persist by tracing modern day manifestations to the progress of law in this area from the days of subjecthood and Empire. It finds that, despite changes in nature of state and governance since days of Empire, contemporary British citizenship has inbuilt legal inequalities which persist from the time of subjecthood.
    [Show full text]