Neuroradiological History: Sir Joseph Larmor and the Basis of MRI Physics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neuroradiological History: Sir Joseph Larmor and the Basis of MRI Physics Neuroradiology 2000) 42: 852±855 Ó Springer-Verlag 2000 HISTORICAL NOTE N.Tubridy Neuroradiological history: Sir Joseph C.S.McKinstry Larmor and the basis of MRI physics Abstract The origin of many of the Key words Larmor, Joseph × Received: 23 July 1999 Accepted: 14 February 2000 eponymous terms in modern medi- Magnetic resonance imaging × cine is unknown to many people Neurology history who utter them daily. As a contribu- tion to understanding the historical N.Tubridy )) NMR Unit, Institute of Neurology, backgroundof MRI, we providea Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK brief account of the life andwork of e-mail: [email protected] Joseph Larmor, the Irish scientist, Tel.: + 44-171-8373611 whose name is frequently usedby Fax: + 44-171-278 5616 chemists, physicists andradiologists alike. C.S.McKinstry Department of Neurology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK Joseph Larmor was born in Magheragall in Co. Antrim 2 years before Einstein publishedhis papers on light on 11 July 1857 Fig. 1), andwas one of the last of a quantum andrelativity. group of nineteenth century `Scoto-Irish' physicists In 1909 Joseph Larmor was knightedandwas the whose work influencedheavily the experiments and Unionist Member of Parliament for Cambridge Uni- discoveries of the early 20th century. He attended school versity from 1911 to 1922. He hadintense feelings over at the Royal Belfast Academical Institution, and was ªthe Irish questionº andin his maidenspeech in 1912 he brought up in Belfast by his uncle Fig. 2). He was a thin, defended the Unionist position in the debate on Irish delicate, black-haired boy of precocious ability in both home rule. He recalledhow he was involvedin the de- mathematics andclassics. He obtaineda doublefirst in feat of the alternative vote, which he claimedto have the scholarship examination at Queen's College Belfast, secured by a long speech, leading the bewildered House andultimately graduatedwith the highest honours. At deeper and deeper into mathematics until the Whip Queen's College he obtaineda BA andan MA. gave him the signal that the wantedabsentees hadar- He went to St.John's College in Cambridge; a severe rived[1]. However, his major concern was for education illness forcedhim to lose a year but he became senior andthe universities. He hada strong attachment to his wrangler andwon Smith's Prize. He took the mathe- native country, andgenerally spent part of his summer matical tripos in 1880, securing first place in the list, and vacation in Ireland. He never married, and retired aged was electeda Fellow of the College the same year. He 75 years in 1932. His last years were spent at Holywood, was appointedProfessor of Natural Philosophy in Co. Down until his death on 19 May 1942 Fig.4). Queen's College, Galway, where he workedfrom 1880 Larmor's scientific work was wide-ranging. By 1892, to 1885 Fig.3). In 1885, he returnedto St.John's as a he hadpublishedsome 30 papers on a variety of subjects lecturer and, on the death of Sir George Stoke, Larmor in appliedmathematics, andhe was electedto the Royal was made the Lucasian professor at Cambridge in 1903. Society of London that year. Between 1894 and 1897 he At this time, the atom was not yet understood and it was published, in the Philosophical Transactions, his great 853 1 2 3 Fig.1 The house in which Joseph Larmor was born in Magher- the heavens were composedof aether also referredto agall, County Antrim, Northern Ireland as quintessence), andthis was postulatedto explain the Fig.2 The house in Antrim Road, Belfast, where Larmor was workings of the universe which surrounded the earth; it brought up by his uncle now a solicitor's office) was supposed to be a sort of medium inside which the Fig.3 Joseph Larmor reprintedwith courtesy of the National universe existed. The nature of aether was, however, University Hospital, Galway) unclear but it was generally agreedthat it existed.Ae- ther was believed to be divided into spheres, naturally perfect, rotating without friction. The planets were be- memoir `A dynamical theory of the electric and lumini- lievedto be regions of high densitywithin this trans- ferous medium' in three parts. The theory was re- parent) aether. The only changes in these general beliefs submitteda year later as an essay on the theory of the from the time of Aristotle to medieval times were in the aberration of light andwon the Adams prize in the character of aether and the addition of a quantitative University of Cambridge. The essay was published as a approach to its analysis. book ± Aether and matter ± in 1900. His writing style has By Larmor's time, aether was the mechanism usedto been described as `difficult' and `lacking lucidity' [1] and explain how light waves travelled, and could be con- his lectures as ill-ordered and obscure. He was decidedly sidered in the same way as water, which also provides a conservative in his scientific views anda difficult col- medium for waves to travel. Larmor could not discover league on syndicates and in examining dissertations. His direct evidence of the motion of the earth through ae- fellow workers described him as ªdetermined but not ther but he did provide a partial explanation, which led persuasiveº, andin the wordsof D'Arcy Thompson, to the theories that were part of Albert Einstein's The- ªLarmor made few friends, perhaps; but while he lived, ory of Relativity [1]. andthey lived,he lost none.º [2] Larmor also made major contributions to electro- Throughout Larmor's work runs an underlying dynamics and electron theory. He proposed that the theme: the principle of least action, or Hamilton's Prin- electrical charge of an electron might be a measure of its ciple. This states that the motion of a particle over short mass andelectrons are now measuredin electron volts intervals will minimise that action integral. William eV). He effecteda new concept calledthe electron Rowan Hamilton 1805±1865) was Ireland's most fa- theory of matter anddevelopedits radicalimplication mous 19th century mathematician andHamilton qua- regarding the nature of mass, the structure of the atom ternions sets of vectors involving imaginary numbers), andits relation to radiation, the kinetic theory of heat are regularly usedin computer graphics andspace-craft equipartition), andthe electrodynamics of moving guidance systems today. A child prodigy, Hamilton bodies. He also contributed to the progress of what is spoke 13 different languages by the age of 13 years [3]. now calledthe Lorentz transformation. This transfor- In the latter half of the 19th century, the existence of mation, namedafter the Dutch physicist HendrikAn- the aether was still acceptedandideasabout such things toon Lorentz, was first written down in 1887 by Voigt, as electrons were not common; there was little under- andin 1889 another Irish physicist ± George Fitzgerald standing of matter and energy. Aristotle explained that from Monkstown in Dublin ± hadpublishedsimilar 854 4 5 6 Fig.4 Sir Joseph Larmor's gravestone at, HolywoodCounty the Larmor precession, the Larmor frequency, andLar- Down mor's theorem. Fig.5 Sir Joseph Larmor courtesy of The Royal Society of Med- Larmor's precession explains the triplication and icine) polarisation of spectral lines which was discovered by Fig.6 Sir Larmor at the unveiling of LordKelvin's statue in 1913 Pietar Zeeman with relatedwork by H.H.Lorentz) when a strong magnetic fieldwas appliedto sodium. Zeeman later won the Nobel Prize) The Larmor fre- quency is given by the equation: Omega = e/2m). B ideas in a paper in Science entitled`The ether andthe where Omega = the angular momentum of an electron; earth's atmosphere'. e = electron; B = magnetic fieldstrength). This theory Larmor was secretary to the Royal Society from holds that, with several orbiting electrons, some orbits 1901 to 1912 andwas the Royal Society's Bakerian wouldbe acceleratedandsome sloweddown,while Lecturer in 1909. In 1915 he was awarded the Royal some wouldremain unaffectedby a magnetic field,so Medal and in 1921 the Copley Medal. He was elected to that there wouldbe a nett effect of zero or a very small the London Mathematical Society in 1884 and held amount). However, spectral lines wouldbe separate for several offices: council member 1887±1912; vice-pre- different speeds. Larmor postulated that electrons orb- sident1890 and1891; treasurer 1892±1914; andpre- itedaroundsome centre. sident 1914±1916. He received the De Morgan Medal of The Larmor theorem was an extension of the above the London Mathematical Society in 1914. He received andstates that: Omega = e/2m). B, i.e., that for any many honorary degrees from universities in Britain, in- chargedparticle with the same e/m ratio, subject to cluding Glasgow, Aberdeen, Birmingham, St.Andrews, electric andmagnetic fields, the effect of the magnetic Edinburgh and Durham, as well as from Academies in fieldcan be negatedby a transformation of the frame of Washington, Boston, Philadelphia, Rome, Bologna and reference with this formula. Larmor's formula described Paris. He also receivedthe freedomof the city of Bel- ways to calculate the power P) radiated by an elec- fast [4]. tron's acceleration in terms of charge e), speedof light Larmor's proposal of an electrical theory of matter c), andthe acceleration a): P = 2/3 e 2 × a2 × c3.Thisis was overshadowed by Einstein's papers on relativity still applicable at speeds of less than close to the speed andthe development of quantum theory. He is re- of light but is no longer vieweduseful in terms of re- memberedprincipally as the first person to give the lativity. formula for the radiation of energy from an accelerated In the fieldof magnetic resonance physics Larmor is electron andhe was also the first to explain the effect of best known for his equation describing the effect of an a magnetic fieldin splitting the spectrum into multiple external magnetic fieldon the precession frequency of lines.
Recommended publications
  • Evolution of Mathematics: a Brief Sketch
    Open Access Journal of Mathematical and Theoretical Physics Mini Review Open Access Evolution of mathematics: a brief sketch Ancient beginnings: numbers and figures Volume 1 Issue 6 - 2018 It is no exaggeration that Mathematics is ubiquitously Sujit K Bose present in our everyday life, be it in our school, play ground, SN Bose National Center for Basic Sciences, Kolkata mobile number and so on. But was that the case in prehistoric times, before the dawn of civilization? Necessity is the mother Correspondence: Sujit K Bose, Professor of Mathematics (retired), SN Bose National Center for Basic Sciences, Kolkata, of invenp tion or discovery and evolution in this case. So India, Email mathematical concepts must have been seen through or created by those who could, and use that to derive benefit from the Received: October 12, 2018 | Published: December 18, 2018 discovery. The creative process of discovery and later putting that to use must have been arduous and slow. I try to look back from my limited Indian perspective, and reflect up on what might have been the course taken up by mathematics during 10, 11, 12, 13, etc., giving place value to each digit. The barrier the long journey, since ancient times. of writing very large numbers was thus broken. For instance, the numbers mentioned in Yajur Veda could easily be represented A very early method necessitated for counting of objects as Dasha 10, Shata (102), Sahsra (103), Ayuta (104), Niuta (enumeration) was the Tally Marks used in the late Stone Age. In (105), Prayuta (106), ArA bud (107), Nyarbud (108), Samudra some parts of Europe, Africa and Australia the system consisted (109), Madhya (1010), Anta (1011) and Parartha (1012).
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Andrews Bumstead 1870-1920
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS VOLUME XIII SECOND MEMOIR BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIR OF HENRY ANDREWS BUMSTEAD 1870-1920 BY LEIGH PAGE PRESENTED TO THE ACADEMY AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, 1929 HENRY ANDREWS BUMSTEAD BY LIUGH PAGE Henry Andrews Bumstead was born in the small town of Pekin, Illinois, on March 12th, 1870, son of Samuel Josiah Bumstead and Sarah Ellen Seiwell. His father, who was a physician of considerable local prominence, had graduated from the medical school in Philadelphia and was one of the first American students of medicine to go to Vienna to complete his studies. While the family was in Vienna, Bumstead, then a child three years of age, learned to speak German as fluently as he spoke English, an accomplishment which was to prove valuable to him in his subsequent career. Bumstead was descended from an old New England family which traces its origin to Thomas Bumstead, a native of Eng- land, who settled in Boston, Massachusetts, about 1640. Many of his ancestors were engaged in the professions, his paternal grandfather, the Reverend Samuel Andrews Bumstead, being a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary and a minister in active service. From them he inherited a keen mind and an unusually retentive memory. It is related that long before he had learned to read, his Sunday school teacher surprised his mother by complimenting her on the ease with which her son had rendered the Sunday lesson. It turned out that his mother made a habit of reading the lesson to Bumstead before he left for school, and the child's remarkable performance there was due to his ability to hold in his memory every word of the lesson after hearing it read to him a single time.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of an Inquest Touching Upon the Death of Mr Joseph Parker
    BEFORE THE CORONER FOR NORTHERN IRELAND MR JOSEPH McCRISKEN THE INQUEST TOUCHING UPON THE DEATH OF MR JOSEPH PARKER ___________________________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] Before I begin to deliver my findings with respect to the death of Mr Joseph Parker I firstly want to give appropriate thanks to Court Service and Coroners Service staff, in particular my investigator Ms Logan, and to all those who have been concerned in the preparations for this inquest. [2] This has been a long and difficult exercise and I wish to pay tribute to my Counsel Mr Daly BL and my Solicitor Ms Lloyd–Stevens, Mr Coll QC, Mr Fletcher BL and Solicitor Ms Meegan, who represented the Ministry of Defence, and Ms Doherty QC, Mr Fahy BL and Mr Ó Muirigh, Solicitor, who represented Mr Parker’s family. Each legal team have gone about their task in a professional and dedicated way and have tested the evidence in this difficult inquest in a sympathetic and sensitive yet robust manner. They are a credit to their profession and proof, if it were needed, of the high standard of legal representation available in Northern Ireland. [3] I wish to recognise the resolve and determination of the Parker family, especially Mr Parker’s sister Teresa and daughters Joanne and Charlene. They have waited almost 46 years for a new inquest into the circumstances of Mr Parker’s death and I hope that these findings provide some measure of closure. 1 Relevant law [4] Rule 15 of the Coroners (Practice and Procedure) Rules (Northern Ireland) 1963 (the 1963 Rules) governs the matters to which inquests shall be directed.
    [Show full text]
  • Skyline Orchestras
    PRESENTS… SKYLINE Thank you for joining us at our showcase this evening. Tonight, you’ll be viewing the band Skyline, led by Ross Kash. Skyline has been performing successfully in the wedding industry for over 10 years. Their experience and professionalism will ensure a great party and a memorable occasion for you and your guests. In addition to the music you’ll be hearing tonight, we’ve supplied a song playlist for your convenience. The list is just a part of what the band has done at prior affairs. If you don’t see your favorite songs listed, please ask. Every concern and detail for your musical tastes will be held in the highest regard. Please inquire regarding the many options available. Skyline Members: • VOCALS AND MASTER OF CEREMONIES…………………………..…….…ROSS KASH • VOCALS……..……………………….……………………………….….BRIDGET SCHLEIER • VOCALS AND KEYBOARDS..………….…………………….……VINCENT FONTANETTA • GUITAR………………………………….………………………………..…….JOHN HERRITT • SAXOPHONE AND FLUTE……………………..…………..………………DAN GIACOMINI • DRUMS, PERCUSSION AND VOCALS……………………………….…JOEY ANDERSON • BASS GUITAR, VOCALS AND UKULELE………………….……….………TOM MCGUIRE • TRUMPET…….………………………………………………………LEE SCHAARSCHMIDT • TROMBONE……………………………………………………………………..TIM CASSERA • ALTO SAX AND CLARINET………………………………………..ANTHONY POMPPNION www.skylineorchestras.com (631) 277 – 7777 DANCE: 24K — BRUNO MARS A LITTLE PARTY NEVER KILLED NOBODY — FERGIE A SKY FULL OF STARS — COLD PLAY LONELY BOY — BLACK KEYS AIN’T IT FUN — PARAMORE LOVE AND MEMORIES — O.A.R. ALL ABOUT THAT BASS — MEGHAN TRAINOR LOVE ON TOP — BEYONCE BAD ROMANCE — LADY GAGA MANGO TREE — ZAC BROWN BAND BANG BANG — JESSIE J, ARIANA GRANDE & NIKKI MARRY YOU — BRUNO MARS MINAJ MOVES LIKE JAGGER — MAROON 5 BE MY FOREVER — CHRISTINA PERRI FT. ED SHEERAN MR. SAXOBEAT — ALEXANDRA STAN BEST DAY OF MY LIFE — AMERICAN AUTHORS NO EXCUSES — MEGHAN TRAINOR BETTER PLACE — RACHEL PLATTEN NOTHING HOLDING ME BACK — SHAWN MENDES BLOW — KE$HA ON THE FLOOR — J.
    [Show full text]
  • December 4, 1954 NATURE 1037
    No. 4440 December 4, 1954 NATURE 1037 COPLEY MEDALLISTS, 1915-54 is that he never ventured far into interpretation or 1915 I. P. Pavlov 1934 Prof. J. S. Haldane prediction after his early studies in fungi. Here his 1916 Sir James Dewar 1935 Prof. C. T. R. Wilson interpretation was unfortunate in that he tied' the 1917 Emile Roux 1936 Sir Arthur Evans word sex to the property of incompatibility and 1918 H. A. Lorentz 1937 Sir Henry Dale thereby led his successors astray right down to the 1919 M. Bayliss W. 1938 Prof. Niels Bohr present day. In a sense the style of his work is best 1920 H. T. Brown 1939 Prof. T. H. Morgan 1921 Sir Joseph Larmor 1940 Prof. P. Langevin represented by his diagrams of Datura chromosomes 1922 Lord Rutherford 1941 Sir Thomas Lewis as packets. These diagrams were useful in a popular 1923 Sir Horace Lamb 1942 Sir Robert Robinson sense so long as one did not take them too seriously. 1924 Sir Edward Sharpey- 1943 Sir Joseph Bancroft Unfortunately, it seems that Blakeslee did take them Schafer 1944 Sir Geoffrey Taylor seriously. To him they were the real and final thing. 1925 A. Einstein 1945 Dr. 0. T. Avery By his alertness and ingenuity and his practical 1926 Sir Frederick Gow­ 1946 Dr. E. D. Adrian sense in organizing the Station for Experimental land Hopkins 1947 Prof. G. H. Hardy Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor (where he worked 1927 Sir Charles Sherring- 1948 . A. V. Hill Prof in 1942), ton 1949 Prof. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Science Advance Effectively Through Philosophical Criticism and Reflection?
    Can science advance effectively through philosophical criticism and reflection? ROBERTO TORRETTI Universidad de Puerto Rico ABSTRACT Prompted by Hasok Chang’s conception of the history and philosophy of science (HPS) as the continuation of science by other means, I examine the possibility of obtaining scientific knowledge through philosophical criticism and reflection, in the light of four historical cases, concerning (i) the role of absolute space in Newtonian dynamics, (ii) the purported contraction of rods and retardation of clocks in Special Relativity, (iii) the reality of the electromagnetic ether, and (iv) the so-called problem of time’s arrow. In all four cases it is clear that a better understanding of such matters can be achieved —and has been achieved— through conceptual analysis. On the other hand, however, it would seem that this kind of advance has more to do with philosophical questions in science than with narrowly scientific questions. Hence, if HPS in effect continues the work of science by other means, it could well be doing it for other ends than those that working scientists ordinarily have in mind. Keywords: Absolute space – Inertial frames – Length contraction – Clock retardation – Special relativity – Ether – Time – Time directedness – Entropy – Boltzmann entropy Philosophical criticism and the advancement of science 2 The mind will not readily give up the attempt to apprehend the exact formal character of the latent connexions between different physical agencies: and the history of discovery may be held perhaps to supply the strongest reason for estimating effort towards clearness of thought as of not less importance in its own sphere than exploration of phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Ether and Electrons in Relativity Theory (1900-1911) Scott Walter
    Ether and electrons in relativity theory (1900-1911) Scott Walter To cite this version: Scott Walter. Ether and electrons in relativity theory (1900-1911). Jaume Navarro. Ether and Moder- nity: The Recalcitrance of an Epistemic Object in the Early Twentieth Century, Oxford University Press, 2018, 9780198797258. hal-01879022 HAL Id: hal-01879022 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01879022 Submitted on 21 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ether and electrons in relativity theory (1900–1911) Scott A. Walter∗ To appear in J. Navarro, ed, Ether and Modernity, 67–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018 Abstract This chapter discusses the roles of ether and electrons in relativity the- ory. One of the most radical moves made by Albert Einstein was to dismiss the ether from electrodynamics. His fellow physicists felt challenged by Einstein’s view, and they came up with a variety of responses, ranging from enthusiastic approval, to dismissive rejection. Among the naysayers were the electron theorists, who were unanimous in their affirmation of the ether, even if they agreed with other aspects of Einstein’s theory of relativity. The eventual success of the latter theory (circa 1911) owed much to Hermann Minkowski’s idea of four-dimensional spacetime, which was portrayed as a conceptual substitute of sorts for the ether.
    [Show full text]
  • One Direction Infection: Media Representations of Boy Bands and Their Fans
    One Direction Infection: Media Representations of Boy Bands and their Fans Annie Lyons TC 660H Plan II Honors Program The University of Texas at Austin December 2020 __________________________________________ Renita Coleman Department of Journalism Supervising Professor __________________________________________ Hannah Lewis Department of Musicology Second Reader 2 ABSTRACT Author: Annie Lyons Title: One Direction Infection: Media Representations of Boy Bands and their Fans Supervising Professors: Renita Coleman, Ph.D. Hannah Lewis, Ph.D. Boy bands have long been disparaged in music journalism settings, largely in part to their close association with hordes of screaming teenage and prepubescent girls. As rock journalism evolved in the 1960s and 1970s, so did two dismissive and misogynistic stereotypes about female fans: groupies and teenyboppers (Coates, 2003). While groupies were scorned in rock circles for their perceived hypersexuality, teenyboppers, who we can consider an umbrella term including boy band fanbases, were defined by a lack of sexuality and viewed as shallow, immature and prone to hysteria, and ridiculed as hall markers of bad taste, despite being driving forces in commercial markets (Ewens, 2020; Sherman, 2020). Similarly, boy bands have been disdained for their perceived femininity and viewed as inauthentic compared to “real” artists— namely, hypermasculine male rock artists. While the boy band genre has evolved and experienced different eras, depictions of both the bands and their fans have stagnated in media, relying on these old stereotypes (Duffett, 2012). This paper aimed to investigate to what extent modern boy bands are portrayed differently from non-boy bands in music journalism through a quantitative content analysis coding articles for certain tropes and themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Einstein Perspectives on Geometry, Gravitation, and Cosmology in the Twentieth Century Editors David E
    David E. Rowe • Tilman Sauer • Scott A. Walter Editors Beyond Einstein Perspectives on Geometry, Gravitation, and Cosmology in the Twentieth Century Editors David E. Rowe Tilman Sauer Institut für Mathematik Institut für Mathematik Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany Mainz, Germany Scott A. Walter Centre François Viète Université de Nantes Nantes Cedex, France ISSN 2381-5833 ISSN 2381-5841 (electronic) Einstein Studies ISBN 978-1-4939-7706-2 ISBN 978-1-4939-7708-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7708-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018944372 Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 01A60, 81T20, 83C47, 83D05 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking 'Classical Physics'
    This is a repository copy of Rethinking 'Classical Physics'. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/95198/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Gooday, G and Mitchell, D (2013) Rethinking 'Classical Physics'. In: Buchwald, JZ and Fox, R, (eds.) Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics. Oxford University Press , Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA , pp. 721-764. ISBN 9780199696253 © Oxford University Press 2013. This is an author produced version of a chapter published in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics. Reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Rethinking ‘Classical Physics’ Graeme Gooday (Leeds) & Daniel Mitchell (Hong Kong) Chapter for Robert Fox & Jed Buchwald, editors Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics (Oxford University Press, in preparation) What is ‘classical physics’? Physicists have typically treated it as a useful and unproblematic category to characterize their discipline from Newton until the advent of ‘modern physics’ in the early twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of MODERN PHYSICS by Claudio Voarino
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF MODERN PHYSICS By Claudio Voarino A Few Words of Introduction In his article, Science and the Mountain Peak, Professor Isaac Asimov wrote: “There has been at least one occasion in history, when Greek secular and rational thought bowed to the mystical aspect of Christianity, and what followed was a Dark Age. We can’t afford another!” I don’t think I am exaggerating when I say that, when it comes to Modern Physics (also known as New Physics), we have indeed been in some sort of intellectual dark age, whether we can afford it or not. In fact, we have been in it since the end of the 19 th Century; and this is when Classical Physics started to be substituted with Modern Physics. This despite the fact there were lots of instances that clearly show the absurdity and science-fictional character of most of the theories of this kind of physics, which I will be discussing in details further on in this article. But for now, the following few examples should prove the correctness of my opinion on this topic. Incidentally, for the purpose of this article, the word ‘physics’ means mostly ‘astrophysics’. Also, whenever referring to modern physicists, I think it is more accurate to add the adjective ‘theoretical’ before the word ‘physicists’. I am saying that because I just cannot associate the main tenets of Relativity and Quantum Physics theories with physical reality. The following example should attest the truth of my statement. Back on September 10, 1989, the Australian newspaper Sunday Telegraph carried the following bizarre article entitled Keep Looking or the Moon May Vanish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: the Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair', Edinburgh Law Review, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School Citation for published version: Cairns, JW 2007, 'The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: The Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair', Edinburgh Law Review, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 300-48. https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.300 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.300 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Edinburgh Law Review Publisher Rights Statement: ©Cairns, J. (2007). The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: The Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair. Edinburgh Law Review, 11, 300-48doi: 10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.300 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 EdinLR Vol 11 pp 300-348 The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: the Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair John W Cairns* A. INTRODUCTION B. EARLIER VIEWS ON THE FOUNDING OF THE CHAIR C.
    [Show full text]