Order COLUMBIFORMES: Pigeons and Doves Suborder COLUMBAE: Pigeons and Doves Family COLUMBIDAE Illiger: Pigeons and Doves Columbini Illiger, 1811: Prodromus Syst

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Order COLUMBIFORMES: Pigeons and Doves Suborder COLUMBAE: Pigeons and Doves Family COLUMBIDAE Illiger: Pigeons and Doves Columbini Illiger, 1811: Prodromus Syst Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 244-245. Order COLUMBIFORMES: Pigeons and Doves Suborder COLUMBAE: Pigeons and Doves Family COLUMBIDAE Illiger: Pigeons and Doves Columbini Illiger, 1811: Prodromus Syst. Mamm. Avium: 243 – Type genus Columba Linnaeus, 1758. Recent classifications of pigeons (e.g. del Hoyo & Sargatal 1997) usually divide the family into five subfamilies: Columbinae Illiger, 1811 (mainly seed-eating pigeons); Treroninae G.R. Gray, 1840 (fruit- eating pigeons); Gourinae G.R. Gray, 1840 (crowned pigeons); and the monotypic Otidiphapinae Verheyen, 1957 (pheasant pigeon) and Didunculinae G.R. Gray, 1848 (Samoan tooth-billed pigeon). The dodo and solitaire, often distinguished as the family Raphidae Wetmore, 1930, should be included within Columbidae (e.g. Kitchener 1993). Recent molecular studies by Johnson & Clayton (2000), Johnson et al. (2001) and Shapiro et al. (2002) show that all these taxa form a monophyletic clade, but do not support the division into the above subfamilies. Here we follow the generic order given by del Hoyo & Sargatal (1997). As both the ordinal status and subfamilial groupings are only partly supported by recent molecular work, future revisions of pigeon higher taxonomy are likely. For this reason we refrain from using subfamilial groupings. Gray (1862: 232) listed Phaps picata (Latham, 1802) (= Leucosarcia melanoleuca (Latham, 1802), wonga pigeon) and Phaps chalcoptera (Latham, 1790) (= common bronzewing) from Norfolk Island. These species records have not been substantiated by specimens or by subsequent records of the same species on that island, so we have omitted them from the Norfolk Island list. Genus *Streptopelia Bonaparte Streptopelia Bonaparte, 1855: Compt. Rend. Séa. Acad. Sci., Paris 40: 17 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Columba risoria Linnaeus = Streptopelia risoria (Linnaeus, 1758). *Streptopelia risoria (Linnaeus) Barbary Dove Columba risoria Linnaeus, 1758: Syst. Nat., 10th edition 1: 165 – India. Columbam roseogriseam Sundevall, 1857: Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 2(1): 54 – Nubia, Sudan. Turtur risorius (Linnaeus); Hutton 1871, Cat. Birds N.Z.: 64. Streptopelia ‘risoria’ (Linnaeus); Goodwin 1970, Pigeons Doves World: 117. Streptopelia roseogrisea (Sundevall); Checklist Committee 1990, Checklist Birds N.Z.: 173. Streptopelia ‘risoria’ (Linnaeus); Higgins & Davies 1996, HANZAB 3: 864. Streptopelia risoria (Linnaeus); ICZN 2008, Bull. Zool. Nomenclature 65(4): 327. North Africa, Arabian Peninsula. This is the domesticated form, also known as ring dove. In New Zealand: first introduced to Nelson, in 1867, and later to Canterbury and Dunedin (Thomson 1922). Since about 1970, there have been feral populations at various places in the North Island from Northland to the Wairarapa. Presently in isolated locations and rare, though reported as locally common about Kerikeri, Auckland and in the Hawke’s Bay. The Masterton population established in the 1970s (Stidolph 1974b) did not persist (Heather & Robertson 1996). A few recent South Island sightings (Robertson, C. et al. 2007). .
Recommended publications
  • Phaps Histrionica (Gould, 1841)
    THREATENED SPECIES INFORMATION Flock Bronzewing Phaps histrionica (Gould, 1841) Other common names Flock Pigeon, Harlequin Bronzewing Conservation status Tarsus 27-30mm The Flock Bronzewing is listed as an Weight Endangered Species on Schedule 1 of the 300g New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 (TSC Act). The Flock Bronzewing is a plump medium- sized pigeon. The species has a short Description (summarised from Higgins & rounded tail and long pointed wings. The Davies 1996) adult male is generally sandy brown above Length and blue grey below with a distinctive black 280-310mm and white head and neck. Females are duller Wing with generally the same patterning. 200-208mm Tail The Flock Bronzewing is usually silent, but 79-87mm a very soft cooo can be heard from flocks Bill on the ground. When displaying, the adult 17-18mm male may vocalise with a wok. G.Chapman Flock Bronzewing x #Y $ Lismore $ $ $ $ #Y #Y Tibooburra Moree $$ #Y $ $ Grafton #Y Bourke $ r #Y Tamworth $ #Y Port Macquarie $ #Y Broken Hill #Y Dubbo #Y Newcastle $ #Y Sydney N #Y Griffith W E #Y Wollongong S #Y Wagga Wagga The sightings represented on this map are #Y only indicative. They cannot be considered Bega as a comprehensive invent ory and may contain errors and omissions. Map Compiled From: LEGEND Species Sightings from the NPWS Atlas of NSW Wildlife Database Flock Bronzewing Predicted distribution data from Ayers e t a l. 1996 r pre 1980 sightings Roads and Riv ers data from AUSLIG $ Flock Bronzewing Copyright NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service,
    [Show full text]
  • Ectoparasites of the Laughing Dove Streptopelia Senegalensis (Linnaeus, 1766) (Aves: Columbidae) in Zaria, Nigeria
    Lundiana 9(1):67-71, 2008 © 2009 Instituto de Ciências Biológicas - UFMG ISSN 1676-6180 Ectoparasites of the Laughing Dove Streptopelia senegalensis (Linnaeus, 1766) (Aves: Columbidae) in Zaria, Nigeria 1Lucas K. Adang, 2Sonnie J. Oniye, 2Augustine U. Ezealor, 3Paul A. Abdu, 4Joseph O. Ajanusi & 1Kennedy P. Yoriyo 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Biological Sciences, 3 Department of Surgery and Medicine, 4 Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. Abstract A survey of ectoparasites of the Laughing Dove (Streptopelia senegalensis Linnaeus, 1766) was carried out in Zaria, Nigeria, to determine the prevalence, intensity and mean intensity of infestation. A total of 382 (231 males and 151 females) doves trapped from different locations in Zaria, Nigeria, were examined through plumage brushing. Eighty-eight (23.0%) of the birds were infested by the following six species of ectoparasites: lice – 32 (8.4%) Menopon gallinae Linnaeus, 1758, 37 (9.7%) Columbicola columbae Linnaeus, 1758, and 18(4.7%) Goniodes sp.; flies – 19 (5.0%) Pseudolynchia canariensis Macquart, 1840; ticks – 12 (3.1%) Argas persicus Oken, 1818; and mite: 1 (0.23%) Dermanyssus gallinae (Degeer, 1778). The frequency of single infestations (59 – 15.4%), was higher than that of double (27 – 7.1%) and triple (2 – 0.52%) infestations, though the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The males had a higher prevalence (55 – 23.8%) than the females (33 – 21.9%). However, this difference was also not significant (p > 0.05). Ectoparasites were collected from the birds through out the year, with highest prevalence (60.0%) in November.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Phthiraptera) Q
    International Journal for Parasitology 47 (2017) 347–356 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpara Comparative cophylogenetics of Australian phabine pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) and their feather lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) q a, b a Andrew D. Sweet ⇑, R. Terry Chesser , Kevin P. Johnson a Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S. Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA b USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USA article info abstract Article history: Host–parasite coevolutionary histories can differ among multiple groups of parasites associated with the Received 26 October 2016 same group of hosts. For example, parasitic wing and body lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) of New World Received in revised form 16 December 2016 pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) differ in their cophylogenetic patterns, with body lice exhibiting Accepted 22 December 2016 higher phylogenetic congruence with their hosts than wing lice. In this study, we focus on the wing and Available online 10 February 2017 body lice of Australian phabine pigeons and doves to determine whether the patterns in New World pigeons and doves are consistent with those of pigeons and doves from other regions. Using molecular Keywords: sequence data for most phabine species and their lice, we estimated phylogenetic trees for all three Wing lice groups (pigeons and doves, wing lice and body lice), and compared the phabine (host) tree with both par- Body lice Australia asite trees using multiple cophylogenetic methods. We found a pattern opposite to that found for New Hippoboscid flies World pigeons and doves, with Australian wing lice showing congruence with their hosts, and body lice exhibiting a lack of congruence.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
    21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Use of the Urban Habitat by Feral Pigeons (Columba Livia)
    Spatio-temporal Use of the Urban Habitat by Feral Pigeons (Columba livia) Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Eva Rose aus St-Sulpice (NE), Schweiz Basel, 2005 Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Peter Nagel, Institut für Natur-, Landschafts- und Umweltschutz Prof. Dr. Daniel Haag-Wackernagel, Integrative Biologie, Anatomisches Institut PD Dr. Jakob Zinsstag, Schweizerisches Tropeninstitut Basel, den 8.2.2005 Prof. Dr. Hans-Jakob Wirz, Dekan Diese Arbeit wurde geleitet von: Prof. Dr. Daniel Haag-Wackernagel Forschungsgruppe Integrative Biologie Anatomisches Institut Departement Klinisch-Biologische Wissenschaften Universität Basel und Prof. Dr. Peter Nagel Institut für Natur-, Landschafts- und Umweltschutz Universität Basel Die Dissertation wurde von der Freiwilligen Akademischen Gesellschaft Basel unterstützt. Table of Contents Abstract......................................................................................................................1 Zusammenfassung.....................................................................................................3 Résumé......................................................................................................................5 Chapter 1 General Introduction...................................................................................................7 Chapter 2 Suitability of Using the
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Migratory and Nomadic Species
    Conserving migratory and nomadic species Claire Alice Runge A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Migration is an incredible phenomenon. Across cultures it moves and inspires us, from the first song of a migratory bird arriving in spring, to the sight of thousands of migratory wildebeest thundering across African plains. Not only important to us as humans, migratory species play a major role in ecosystem functioning across the globe. Migratory species use multiple landscapes and can have dramatically different ecologies across their lifecycle, making huge contributions to resource fluxes and nutrient transport. However, migrants around the world are in decline. In this thesis I examine our conservation response to these declines, exploring how well current approaches account for the unique needs of migratory species, and develop ways to improve on these. The movements of migratory species across time and space make their conservation a multidimensional problem, requiring actions to mitigate threats across jurisdictions, across habitat types and across time. Incorporating such linkages can make a dramatic difference to conservation success, yet migratory species are often treated for the purposes of conservation planning as if they were stationary, ignoring the complex linkages between sites and resources. In this thesis I measure how well existing global conservation networks represent these linkages, discovering major gaps in our current protection of migratory species. I then go on to develop tools for improving conservation of migratory species across two areas: prioritizing actions across species and designing conservation networks. Protected areas are one of our most effective conservation tools, and expanding the global protected area estate remains a priority at an international level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pigeon Names Columba Livia, ‘C
    Thomas M. Donegan 14 Bull. B.O.C. 2016 136(1) The pigeon names Columba livia, ‘C. domestica’ and C. oenas and their type specimens by Thomas M. Donegan Received 16 March 2015 Summary.—The name Columba domestica Linnaeus, 1758, is senior to Columba livia J. F. Gmelin, 1789, but both names apply to the same biological species, Rock Dove or Feral Pigeon, which is widely known as C. livia. The type series of livia is mixed, including specimens of Stock Dove C. oenas, wild Rock Dove, various domestic pigeon breeds and two other pigeon species that are not congeners. In the absence of a plate unambiguously depicting a wild bird being cited in the original description, a neotype for livia is designated based on a Fair Isle (Scotland) specimen. The name domestica is based on specimens of the ‘runt’ breed, originally illustrated by Aldrovandi (1600) and copied by Willughby (1678) and a female domestic specimen studied but not illustrated by the latter. The name C. oenas Linnaeus, 1758, is also based on a mixed series, including at least one Feral Pigeon. The individual illustrated in one of Aldrovandi’s (1600) oenas plates is designated as a lectotype, type locality Bologna, Italy. The names Columba gutturosa Linnaeus, 1758, and Columba cucullata Linnaeus, 1758, cannot be suppressed given their limited usage. The issue of priority between livia and domestica, and between both of them and gutturosa and cucullata, requires ICZN attention. Other names introduced by Linnaeus (1758) or Gmelin (1789) based on domestic breeds are considered invalid, subject to implicit first reviser actions or nomina oblita with respect to livia and domestica.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome Sequence of the European Turtle Dove, Streptopelia
    Wellcome Open Research 2021, 6:191 Last updated: 03 SEP 2021 DATA NOTE The genome sequence of the European turtle dove, Streptopelia turtur Linnaeus 1758 [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] Jenny C. Dunn 1, Keith C. Hamer2, Antony J. Morris 3, Philip V. Grice4, Michelle Smith5, Craig Corton5, Karen Oliver5, Jason Skelton5, Emma Betteridge5, Jale Dolucan 5,6, Michael A. Quail5, Shane A. McCarthy5,7, Marcela Uliano-Silva5, Kerstin Howe 5, James Torrance 5, William Chow5, Sarah Pelan5, Ying Sims5, Richard Challis 5, Jonathan Threlfall 5, Daniel Mead 5,8, Mark Blaxter 5 1University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK 2School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK 3Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, UK 4Natural England, Peterborough, PE1 1NG, UK 5Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK 6Achilles Therapeutics plc, London, W6 8PW, UK 7Department of Genetics, University of Cambrudge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK 8Owlstone Medical, Cambridge, CB4 0GJ, UK v1 First published: 27 Jul 2021, 6:191 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17060.1 Latest published: 27 Jul 2021, 6:191 https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17060.1 Reviewer Status AWAITING PEER REVIEW Any reports and responses or comments on the Abstract article can be found at the end of the article. We present a genome assembly from an individual female Streptopelia turtur (the European turtle dove; Chordata; Aves; Columbidae). The genome sequence is 1.18 gigabases in span. The majority of the assembly is scaffolded into 35 chromosomal pseudomolecules, with the W and Z sex chromosomes assembled.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Turtle Dove Was Named for the First Time in 1758 by Linnaeus As Columba Turtur
    Taxonomy The European Turtle Dove was named for the first time in 1758 by Linnaeus as Columba turtur. The genus of the European Turtle Dove has had several name changes throughout the years, but eventually The European was named Streptopelia. This name was given by Carolo Luciano Bona- parte in 1855 and is based on the neck drawing of the many species of turtle doves. The Greek word streptos means collar and peleia is Greek for dove. Streptopelia can therefore be directly translated into Turtle Dove ‘collared doves’. Text composed by Charles van de Kerkhof The European Turtle Dove is closely related to the Dusky Turtle Dove Photos by Charles van de Kerkhof in the collection (Streptopelia lugens), to the Adamawa Turtle Dove (S. hypopyrrha) and of the Natural History Museum at Tring, United Kingdom to the Oriental Turtle Dove (S. orientalis). Subspecies and distribution Currently four subspecies of the European Turtle Dove are recognised, the previously described subspecies isabellina is included in rufescens. The four subspecies are: • S. t. turtur (Linnaeus, 1758) is found in Europe, Asia and Africa, the breeding grounds stretch from Great Britain in the west to Kazakh- stan in the east, Russia in the north to the North-African Mediter- ranean cost in the south, including Madeira and the Canary Islands. • S. t. arenicola (Hartert, 1894) is found in Africa and Asia, from Mo- rocco to Tripoli and from Iraq and Iran to north-western China in the east. • S. t. hoggara (Geyr von Schweppenburg, 1916) is found in Africa, in the Hoggar mountains in Algeria and the Aïr mountains in Niger.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Mascarene Islands, with Three New Species
    Zootaxa 3124: 1–62 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 3124 Systematics, morphology, and ecology of pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) of the Mascarene Islands, with three new species JULIAN PENDER HUME Correspondence Address: Bird Group, The Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Akeman St, Tring, Herts HP23 6AP. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by S. Olson: 11 Oct. 2011; published: 08 Dec. 2011 JULIAN PENDER HUME Systematics, morphology, and ecology of pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) of the Mascarene Islands, with three new species (Zootaxa 3124) 62 pp.; 30 cm. 08 Dec. 2011 ISBN 978-1-86977-825-5 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-826-2 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2011 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2011 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 3124 © 2011 Magnolia Press HUME Table of contents Abstract . 3 Introduction . 3 Materials and methods . 5 Systematics . 6 Discussion .
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Status Review for the Peregrine Falcon
    STATE OF WASHINGTON October 2016 Periodic Status Review for the Peregrine Falcon Mark S. Vekasy and Gerald E. Hayes Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains a list of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species (Washington Administrative Codes 232-12-014 and 232-12-011). In 1990, the Washington Wildlife Commission adopted listing procedures developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297). The procedures include how species listings will be initiated, criteria for listing and delisting, a require¬ment for public review, the development of recovery or management plans, and the periodic review of listed species. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife is directed to conduct reviews of each endangered, threatened, or sensitive wildlife species at least every five years after the date of its listing by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission. The periodic status reviews are designed to include an update of the species status report to determine whether the status of the species warrants its current listing status or deserves reclassification. The agency notifies the general public and specific parties who have expressed their interest to the Department of the periodic status review at least one year prior to the five-year period so that they may submit new scientific data to be included in the review. The agency notifies the public of its findings at least 30 days prior to presenting the findings to the Fish and Wildlife Commission. In addition, if the agency determines that new information suggests that the classification of a species should be changed from its present state, the agency prepares documents to determine the environmental consequences of adopting the recommendations pursuant to requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act.
    [Show full text]