Preliminary Infrastructure Development for Altair Sortie Operations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Infrastructure Development for Altair Sortie Operations Preliminary Infrastructure Development for Altair Sortie Operations Madhu Thangavelu * and Eshete Mekonnen. † Department of Astronautics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 -1191 NASA’s Exploration Systems Architecture Study ( ESAS) rep ort envisions humans returning to the Moon in the 2020 timeframe. However, many factors still need to be addressed in depth. They include site selection, materials, and design of inhabitable and survivable infrastructure elements. One of the most important issues dealing with a manned return mission to the Moon is lunar dust. Dust suppression is a critical issue with regard to Altair operations as well as surface vehicles in the proximity of the habitat. Dust and debris thrown up by vehicles can also degrad e exposed payloads such as telescope elements and photovoltaic arrays. This paper explores several architectural concepts relating to developing essential preliminary infrastructure for humans on the lunar surface during the first several missions. Concept s discussed include certain selection criteria aspects for lunar habitat location as well as a variety of architectural elements, which can ameliorate the effects of lunar dust during Altair operations and routine surface vehicle movement around the primar y lunar settlement. Specifically, these elements include a microwave sintered landing zone around a hard, paved and topped landing pad for repeated service use, inflatable structures for blast aprons, a light rail system with pallet, winch and gantry suppo rt for lander and payload transport from landing pad to hangar or habitat location, a hard, topped dust -free platform on which to erect the habitat and allied structures, and a built -up access road from the habitat area to the hangar and the landing pad. A n emergency exit route from habitat to a standby escape vehicle is also depicted as well as a dust monitoring system and a dust cleaning rover attachment is suggested as well. I. Introduction HE USC ASTE 527 team project of Fall 2008 “Return to the Moon: L ooking Glass 204” explored a variety of Tconcepts for NASA’s plan to return people, first on one week surface stays, extending them to 14 days and eventually up to six months. The USC team was tasked specifically to go beyond NASA’s Mars Forward technology development program to propose on two more fronts, namely to commission a variety of permanent assets that are useful not only to the scientists but also for the public and to look at how this specific project might be employed to inspire a new generation of explorers. This project is envisioned to happen between 2020 and 2040. Assuming two or three Altair missions every year, we expect between 50 -60 Altair derived landers to be serviced around the lunar globe, with at least 50 of them in the vicinity of a south polar lunar settlement. They include both crew sortie and cargo missions. The other 10 landers would primarily be cargo landers with specialized payloads to be commissioned in remote locations of the lunar globe. Substantial international participati on is foreseen in all a spects including Earth to Moon t ransportation, landers and payloads. It is in this context that the preliminary infrastructure development concepts proposed in this paper are portrayed. * Conductor, ASTE527 Space Concepts Studio, Department of Astronautics, Viterbi School of Engineering, Graduate Thesis Adviser, School o f Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, AIAA Member † Graduate Student, Department of Astronautics, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, AIAA Student Member 1 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics II. Lunar Settlement in Polar Region While satellit es are still gathering crucial data, there is some consensus building within the space community which suggests that polar regions might offer a better initial location for manned lunar operations. The South Polar Region is shown in figure 1. 1 The Malaper t mountain range, the Malapert crater and environs have been discussed in recent literature as potential regions of interest to locate a lunar settlement 2. The Shackleton crater and environs, almost directly at the South Pole has also been targeted as a si te of interest 1. The distance to the Schrodinger crater is also shown in figure 1, primarily because it is an ideal location to setup sensitive radio telescopes. This far -side location of the Moon would effectively block any interference from radio -noise g enerated on Earth. Eventually, an advanced far -side settlement would also better simulate conditions on a planetary base without the Earth -disc in view for the crew. Pending more specific data from missions in progress including the Lunar Reconnaissance Or biter/ Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite ( LRO/LCROSS), these two locations were adopted as the sites of interest for the Fall 2008 USC project. Figure 1: Image of Lunar Map of the South Pole 3, 4 . Lunar map shows regions of interest for the lunar colony; Mons Malapert and Shackleton, and their distances between each location. The distance to the Schrodinger crater is shown as it is a good location for situating certain observator ies away from Earth noise using robots and crew in extra -vehicular activities (EVA). III. Preliminary Infrastructure (PI) Elements Generally, besides offering ample opportunity for exploration and technology development, a site must provide a safe zone for crew to operate in. It must present a viable route for logistics support and emergency abort operations and rescue missions. The polar regions of the Moon also offer longer periods of solar illumination 2, 5 , allowing the quick and straightforward deployment of photovoltaic power plants for near -continuous electricity generation. If water and volatiles are confirmed there, this will be a boon to the settlement by providing liquids and gases to replenish power, consumption and other losses. Sulfur has been propos ed as a binder for lunar concrete 6. Water could also make a good binding agent, allowing straightforward regolith stabilization and dust suppression, through sublimation -deposition process, in permanently shadowed lunar development. 2 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics For Altair operations, the following site attributes and systems are considered essential: A. Topography suitable for direct line -of -sight visual acquisition of landing zone for Altair pilot, preferably both during lunar day as well as lunar night, aided by Earth shine. B. Dust suppr ession employed around approach and ascent zone. C. A well lit, sturdy and dust free landing pad. D. A simple and easy to deploy system for transporting Altair lander and payload from landing pad to hangar and habitat. E. A safe and reliable means to transfer crew and cargo to and from habitat. F. A similar way to conduct lift -off operations. G. A quick and reliable exit to abort or rescue crew in the event of an emergency. H. Allied structures to support these activities. I. Other Systems for PI depicted in Looking Glass 204 P roject Figure 2 depicts the main preliminary infrastructure design of the proposed lunar colony. Figure 2: Preliminary Infrastructure (PI) design. Design and dimensions of lunar base, top view (drawing not to scale), which includes the emergency e sc ape vehicle, the cable/winch system for moving equipment easily out of the landing pad area as well as shows the var ious regolith rock outcrop show depending on location . *Note the landing pad and dust suppression zone is on top of an elevated surface. A. Di rect Visual Acquisition of Landing Zone and Pad - Earth Shine The shallow insulation angles in the polar regions tend to present a dimly lit lunar surface with stark relief and stretched shadows. However, since Malapert range faces the Earth, a carefully s elected landing site in this region would also be illuminated by the Earth disc for most of the lunar night 2. Earthlight would allow for visual acquisition of landing zone for Altair pilots. Even though the Altair lander would be assisted by instrumental l anding aids, the ability for the pilot to take the controls at any time during descent and touchdown is considered essential. Earth shine would also allow for enhanced lunar surface operations, alleviating thermal loads on operational systems across the bo ard. B. Dust Suppression As the Altair lander descends towards the landing pad, the main engines and reaction control system (RCS) will kick up a large amount of lunar dust 7 as shown in the images of figure 3. To minimize this effect caused by Altair descent engines, it is proposed to deploy the landing pad atop a natural hill or mound with a slope of between 1:12 to 1:20. To further prevent this dust scattering, the regolith surface around in an area about 3 km in diameter surrounding the landing pad, called the landing zone, will be stabilized. 3 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Figure 3: Effects of lunar dust disturbance and Altair thruster ejecta on various landing terrain. Top images depicts landing on an elevated surface. Middle image depicts landing on a level/flat terrain. Bottom image depicts landing on a concave, crater surface. Detailed studies are needed to verify that an elevated pad on the lunar surface would show diminished dust disturbance than the other two alternatives depicted. C. Landing Pad The reusable landing pad should be easy to identify within the landing zone for the Altair pilot. It will have a resilient surface for repeated operations as well as all the supporting elements to assist in quickly moving the lander and payload in and out of this zone of activity. Infla table aprons to contain or curtail lander ejecta are suggested. By locating the habitat directly east from the landing pad and a possible expansion of the settlement located due west, the two -stage descent module of the Altair could approach and touch -dow n from the south and the ascent stage module could lift -off to the north when the astronauts depart the settlement, as seen in figure 4.
Recommended publications
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Program Overview
    Constellation Program Overview October 2008 hris Culbert anager, Lunar Surface Systems Project Office ASA/Johnson Space Center Constellation Program EarthEarth DepartureDeparture OrionOrion -- StageStage CrewCrew ExplorationExploration VehicleVehicle AresAres VV -- HeavyHeavy LiftLift LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle AltairAltair LunarLunar LanderLander AresAres II -- CrewCrew LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle Lunar Capabilities Concept Review EstablishedEstablished Lunar Lunar Transportation Transportation EstablishEstablish Lunar Lunar Surface SurfaceArchitecturesArchitectures ArchitectureArchitecture Point Point of of Departure: Departure: StrategiesStrategies which: which: Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree ProvidesProvides crew crew & & cargo cargo delivery delivery to to & & from from the the Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree within acceptable schedule moonmoon within acceptable schedule Are consistent with capacity and capabilities ProvidesProvides capacity capacity and and ca capabilitiespabilities consistent consistent Are consistent with capacity and capabilities withwith candidate candidate surface surface architectures architectures ofof the the transportation transportation systems systems ProvidesProvides sufficient sufficient performance performance margins margins IncludeInclude set set of of options options fo for rvarious various prioritizations prioritizations of cost, schedule & risk RemainsRemains within within programmatic programmatic constraints constraints of cost, schedule & risk ResultsResults in in acceptable
    [Show full text]
  • Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report
    CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3, Number 3, November 2014
    THE STAR THE NEWSLETTER OF THE MOUNT CUBA ASTRONOMICAL GROUP VOL. 3 NUM. 3 CONTACT US AT DAVE GROSKI [email protected] OR HANK BOUCHELLE [email protected] 302-983-7830 OUR PROGRAMS ARE HELD THE SECOND TUESDAY OF EACH MONTH AT 7:30 P.M. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE MOUNT CUBA ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY 1610 HILLSIDE MILL ROAD GREENVILLE DE. FOR DIRECTIONS PLEASE VISIT www.mountcuba.org PLEASE SEND ALL PHOTOS AND ARTICLES TO [email protected] 1 NOVEMBER MEETING TUESDAY THE 11TH 7:30 p.m. OCTOBER MEETING REVIEW: Dave Groski gave a presentation on the Spilhaus Space Clock. This is such an interesting devise that I shall cover it in more detail under the Points of Interest section of the STAR. Dr. Hank Bouchelle once again gave a truly informative talk on not one but several topics related to Astronomy and Physics in general. Since he covered such a varied group of topics, I shall also cover them in the Points of Interest section. Phenomena: Knock! Knock! Is Anyone home? Hank Bouchelle Cinematic depictions of the events accompanying an alien visit are almost uniformly dire. Alien intentions are almost always destructive, deadly, or intended to enslave. They destroy entire populations, and unleash weapons that easily turn Earth to dust. Reports of personal interactions with aliens frequently relate queasy adventures in proctology. It is a bit strange, then, that many people, especially among the scientific community, spare no effort or cost to detect alien messages or the electronic fingerprint of signals that are not produced by the nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Dream Center for Lunar Science: a Three Year Summary Report
    Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (2012) 3027.pdf DREAM CENTER FOR LUNAR SCIENCE: A THREE YEAR SUMMARY REPORT. W. M. Farrell1,3, R. M. Killen1,3, and G. T. Delory2,3, 1Solar System Exploration Division, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 2Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 3NASA’s Lunar Science Institute, NASA/Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA. Abstract. In early 2009, the Dynamic Response of the Environment At the Moon (DREAM) lunar sci- ence center became a supporting team of NASA's Lu- nar Science Institute specifically to study the solar- lunar connection and understand the response of the lunar plasma, exosphere, dust, and near-surface envi- ronments to solar variations. DREAM especially em- phasizes the effect extreme events like solar storms and impacts have on the plasma-surface-gas dynamical system. One of the center's hallmark contribution is the solar storm/lunar atmosphere modeling (SSLAM) study that cross-integrated a large number of the cen- The Solar-Lunar Connection studies by DREAM. Solar ener- ter's models to determine the effect a strong solar storm gy and matter stimulate the lunar surface, resulting in an exo- has at the Moon. The results from this intramural event sphere, exo-ionosphere, lifted dust, and plasma flow layers. will be described herein. A number of other key studies were performed, including a unique ground-based observation of the LCROSS impact-generated sodium plume, exo- atmosphere modeling studies, and focused studies on the formation and distribution of lunar water. The team is supporting ARTEMIS lunar plasma interaction stud- ies via modeling/data validation efforts, especially ex- amining ion reflection from magnetic anomalies and pick-up ions from the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • ART and ECLIPSES Established in History with Customs and Norms
    Volume 6, Issue 4 SOLAR ECLIPSE NEWSLETTER Page 23 ART AND ECLIPSES established in history with customs and norms. These Andean Indians also had established a great deal of accuracy in solar observations and calculations. But the question still remains, did isolated indians have a way to know what time this eclipse would start? Did they, in- stead keep a fire burning all day? (unlikely at this altitude to keep gasoline burning all day) If they did know when... then how? Jen Winter From: Michel-André Levy Do you really think that a logical behaviour, when an eclipse is announced, is to light fires ? I don't think any of the list members ever did so during an eclipse. There are various reasons for keeping a fire burning during the day. In the alti- plano, I suppose it can be cold. Or may be they wanted to cook something.... So, I would not say that the fires were "obviously" lit because of the eclipse. Michel-Andre LEVY From: Vic & Jen Winter, ICSTARS Inc. > I don't think any of the list members ever did so during an eclipse. ....by the Indians. From: Glenn Schneider <[email protected]> The Aymara Indians also In 1981 I observed the TSE from a site near Bratsk, Siberia, along with hundreds oif other non-Soviets (this was back in the days of the USSR), selected by a local/governmental coordinating and organizing traditionally told committe). They thoughtfully were going to provide a post-eclipse lunch at the site. To do so they erected not to look at some rather large open-fire grills, and during ingress partial phase began to cook mounds of shasliks the eclipse.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Exploration Efforts
    Module 3 – Nautical Science Unit 4 – Astronomy Chapter 13 - The Moon Section 1 – The Moon What You Will Learn to Do Demonstrate understanding of astronomy and how it pertains to our solar system and its related bodies: Moon, Sun, stars and planets Objectives 1. Recognize basic facts about the Moon such as size, distance from Earth and atmosphere 2. Describe the geographical structure of the Moon 3. Describe the surface features of the Moon 4. Explain those theories that describe Moon craters and their formations Objectives 5. Describe the mountain ranges and riles on the surface of the Moon 6. Explain the effect moonquakes have on the Moon 7. Describe how the Moon’s motion causes its phases 8. Explain the basic reasons for Moon exploration Key Terms CPS Key Term Questions 1 - 12 Key Terms Maria - Mare or Maria (plural); Any of the several dark plains on the Moon and Mars; Latin word for “Sea” Reflectance - The ratio of the intensity of reflected radiation to that of the radiation that initially hits the surface. Key Terms Impact Crater - The cup shaped depression or cavity on the surface of the Earth or other heavenly bodies. Breccia - Rock composed of angular fragments of older rocks melded together as a result of a meteor impact. Regolith - The layer of disintegrated rock fragments (dust), just above the solid rock of the Moon’s crust. Key Terms Rilles - Cracks in the lunar surface similar to shallow, meandering river beds on the Earth. Phases The Moon’s motion in its orbit (of the Moon) - causes its phases (progressive changes in the visible portion of the Moon).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Scan.Pdf
    Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) Program Commercial & International Lunar Communications and Navigation Studies Calvin Ramos (for Jim Schier) 13 May 2008 DRAFT SCaN Interface with Customers/Missions Space Communications & Navigation - Not Just Important, It's Vital 2 State of “Commercial” in SCaN • Space Network (SN)/Tracking & Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) is & will remain Government Owned/Government Operated (GOGO) • Deep Space Network (DSN) is GOGO; contains significant unique technology not in industry; no market beyond NASA – Not a good candidate for commercialization • Ground Network (GN) is ~1/3 GOGO & 2/3 Contractor Owned & Operated (COCO) in transition to 90% COCO • NASA Integrated Services Network (NISN) runs entirely on AT&T • Lunar Network (LN) conceived to support Science & Exploration missions – Subject of new commercial and international study Space Communications & Navigation - Not Just Important, It's Vital 3 Science & Exploration Drivers • SMD - ILN of 6-12 surface stations • ILN Kickoff (12 March 2008) - open to participation by all national space agencies • Initial lunar surface stations in the geophysical network may launch as early as 2011 (UK) or 2013 (US) Space Communications & Navigation - Not Just Important, It's Vital 4 Science & Exploration Drivers • ESMD Studies to date have treated Communication & Navigation (C&N) as if entirely provided by NASA – Lunar Architecture Team Phase 1 & 2 (2006-2007) – Constellation Architecture Team Lunar Surface Systems (CxAT LSS) (2008) • Initial Altair lunar
    [Show full text]
  • Surveyor 1 Space- Craft on June 2, 1966 As Seen by the Narrow Angle Camera of the Lunar Re- Connaissance Orbiter Taken on July 17, 2009 (Also See Fig
    i “Project Surveyor, in particular, removed any doubt that it was possible for Americans to land on the Moon and explore its surface.” — Harrison H. Schmitt, Apollo 17 Scientist-Astronaut ii Frontispiece: Landing site of the Surveyor 1 space- craft on June 2, 1966 as seen by the narrow angle camera of the Lunar Re- connaissance Orbiter taken on July 17, 2009 (also see Fig. 13). The white square in the upper photo outlines the area of the enlarged view below. The spacecraft is ca. 3.3 m tall and is casting a 15 m shadow to the East. (NASA/LROC/ ASU/GSFC photos) iii iv Surveyor I: America’s First Moon Landing by William F. Mellberg v © 2014, 2015 William F. Mellberg vi About the author: William Mellberg was a marketing and public relations representative with Fokker Aircraft. He is also an aerospace historian, having published many articles on both the development of airplanes and space vehicles in various magazines. He is the author of Famous Airliners and Moon Missions. He also serves as co-Editor of Harrison H. Schmitt’s website: http://americasuncommonsense.com Acknowledgments: The support and recollections of Frank Mellberg, Harrison Schmitt, Justin Rennilson, Alexander Gurshstein, Paul Spudis, Ronald Wells, Colin Mackellar and Dwight Steven- Boniecki is gratefully acknowledged. vii Surveyor I: America’s First Moon Landing by William F. Mellberg A Journey of 250,000 Miles . December 14, 2013. China’s Chang’e 3 spacecraft successfully touched down on the Moon at 1311 GMT (2111 Beijing Time). The landing site was in Mare Imbrium, the Sea of Rains, about 25 miles (40 km) south of the small crater, Laplace F, and roughly 100 miles (160 km) east of its original target in Sinus Iridum, the Bay of Rainbows.
    [Show full text]
  • N93-13593 Lunar Optical Telescopes: an Historical Perspective
    N93-13593 LUNAR OPTICAL TELESCOPES: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Stewart W. Johnson BDM International, Inc. 1801 Randolph Road, S.E. Albuquerque, NM 87106 Abstract There is a long history of thought and discussion on the possibilities of astronomical observatories on the Moon. Numerous ideas have been suggested and a variety of concepts have resulted for lunar optical telescopes. This paper reviews some of the ideas and efforts of individuals and working groups including Hershel, Clarke, Malina, Herbig, and Hess; working groups of the 1960s; and recent initiatives of Burke, Burns, and others. The enhanced technologies of the 1980s and 1990s can make past dreams of lunar observatories come to reality in the 21st century. That an astronomical observatory on the Moon offers the potential advantages of emplacement on a stable platform in an environment unencumbered by atmospheric obscurations has long been recognized. The National Academy of Sciences report, Astronomy and Astroohvsics for the 1980s, listed seven promising programs for the 1990s and beyond. All of these programs involved space-based observations and one of the programs was entitled Astronomical Observations on the Moon. The report states: The Moon offers certain decisive advantages as a base for astronomical observations. In particular the far side of the Moon provides protection from the radio interference from sources on or near Earth and therefore has great potential for radio astronomy. Shielded at all times from earthlight, sites on the far side of the Moon are also shielded from sunlight for substantial portions of each month and thus offer advantages for optical and infrared observations requiring the darkest possible sky.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Alshain: a Lunar Flying Vehicle for Rapid Universal Surface Access
    Project Alshain: A Lunar Flying Vehicle for Rapid Universal Surface Access University of Maryland, College Park ENAE484: Space Systems Design Faculty Advisors Dr. David Akin Dr. Mary Bowden Student Team Sarah Beal* Alex Janas* Zachary Neumann Theodor Talvac Nicholas D'Amore* Adam Kirk Nathaniel Niles Andrew Turner Pratik Dave Matthew Kosmer Joseph Park Neil Vasilak Amirhadi Ekrami Ryan Lebois Kush Patel Scott Weinberg Edwin Fernandes Arber Masati Fazle Siddique Andrew Wilson Adam Halperin* Andrew McLaren Michael Sotak Jarred Young Bryan Han Breanne McNerney* Nitin Sydney* Jolyon Zook * Student leads Submission Date: 5/25/2009 Introduction Since the Apollo program, the United States has foregone going to the Moon in order to focus on other space applications. However, with the advent of the Constellation Program, NASA plans a triumphant manned return to the moon, and the establishment of a permanent lunar base near the south pole. One goal of the base is to further exploration and research of the lunar surface. With the installation of a permanent outpost, a transportation infrastructure must be developed in order to efficiently travel, research, and explore the Moon’s surface. Since a permanent outpost has never been developed, one can use the Antarctic base infrastructure as an analogue to what means of transportation must be made available in such an uninhabitable, unexplored environment. For example, in Antarctica, scientists have the means to travel short distances between buildings and around the base using snowmobiles, and the ability to conduct longer research missions using closed cabin vehicles. The use of helicopters and aircraft enables unsurpassed range and speed for long distance missions.
    [Show full text]
  • ALTAIR: Millennium's DARPA Seeme Satellite Solution Technical (R
    SSC14-III-2 ALTAIR™ : Millennium’s DARPA SeeMe Satellite Solution Technical (R)evolution Michael Scardera, Matt Baker, Reid Reynolds, Shalini Reddy, Kevin Kellogg, Michael Mahoney, Paul Silversmith, Natalie Rodriguez, Peter Dohm Millennium Space Systems 2265 E. El Segundo Blvd. El Segundo, CA 90245; (310) 683-5853 [email protected] ABSTRACT Millennium Space Systems ALTAIR™ “27U” satellite developed under DARPA’s SeeMe (Space Enabled Effects for Military Engagements) program represents a game-changing spacecraft class addressing military, civil, and commercial needs, balancing extreme affordability, performance, and schedule responsiveness. DARPA’s overarching requirement called for a 24-spacecraft constellation, with satellites flying in any orbit, at less than $500K cost each, and with readiness to launch 90 days after call-up. This paper discusses the design process and lessons learned during high-altitude balloon tests and full engineering-model spacecraft development to achieve both high performance and low cost. We describe the driving spacecraft innovations to successfully achieve DARPA’s requirements. Innovations include payload performance, 3-D printed structure, GN&C/ACS Suite performance, communications system approach, Flight Software Implementation, Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) part usage, development & production approaches, and enabling constellation technologies. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. Distribution Statement "A" (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited). INTRODUCTION the spacecraft can fly in any orbit including high LEO, Millennium’s ALTAIR™ satellite implements a low- MEO, and GEO cost, high-performance vision for spacecraft design, manufacture, launch, and operations.
    [Show full text]