07.14.16 Planning Agenda Packet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

07.14.16 Planning Agenda Packet - A City of Sonoma Planning Commission AGENDA Regular Meeting of July 14, 2016 -- 6:30 PM Community Meeting Room, 177 First Street West Sonoma, CA 95476 Meeting Length: No new items will be heard by the Planning Commission after 10:30 PM, unless the Commission, by majority vote, specifically decides to continue reviewing items. If an item is not heard due to the length of the meeting, the Commission will attempt to schedule a special meeting for the following week. If a special meeting is necessary, potential dates will be established at the close of this meeting, and a date set as soon as possible thereafter. CALL TO ORDER – Chair, Robert Felder Commissioners: Michael Coleman James Cribb Chip Roberson Mary Sek Ron Wellander Bill Willers Robert McDonald (Alternate) Be Courteous - TURN OFF your cell phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: Presentations by audience members on items not appearing on the agenda. MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of June 9, 2016. CORRESPONDENCE ITEM #1 – CONSENT CALENDAR REQUEST: RECOMMENDED ACTION: These items will be acted upon in one Request for a one-year extension to the Grant one-year extension. motion unless removed from the Use Permit allowing a multi-tenant Consent Calendar for discussion by marketplace, including restaurant uses, Commissioners or any interested party. for the Sonoma Cheese Factory at 2 West Spain Street (Applicant: Viviani Trust). ITEM #2 – PUBLIC HEARING Project Location: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 458 East MacArthur Street REQUEST: Approve with conditions. Consideration of Exceptions to the General Plan Designation: height standards and rear yard setback Low Density Residential (LR) CEQA Status: requirements to legalize an existing Categorically Exempt. accessory structure located in the rear Zoning: yard of a residential property. Planning Area: Central-East Area Applicant/Property Owner: Base: Low Density Residential (R-L) Robert Baumann & Associates/Leslie Overlay: None Carlson Staff: Wendy Atkins City of Sonoma/Planning Commission Agenda Page 1 ITEM #3 – PUBLIC HEARING Project Location: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 456 Fifth Street West REQUEST: Commission discretion. Consideration of a Use Permit to General Plan Designation: convert a building into a vacation rental Mixed Use (MU) CEQA Status: unit. Categorically Exempt. Zoning: Applicant/Property Owner: Planning Area: Northwest Area Ryan Martin Base: Mixed Use (MX) Staff: Wendy Atkins Overlay: None ITEM #4 – PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDED ACTION: ISSUE: Review of Draft Downtown Sonoma Forward to City Council, with Preservation Design Guidelines. recommendations. Staff: Wendy Atkins CEQA Status: Not applicable. ISSUES UPDATE COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ADJOURNMENT I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board on July 8, 2016. CRISTINA MORRIS, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT Rights of Appeal: Any decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be filed with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days following the Planning Commission’s decision, unless the fifteenth day falls on a weekend or a holiday, in which case the appeal period ends at the close of the next working day at City Hall. Appeals must be made in writing and must clearly state the reason for the appeal. Appeals will be set for hearing before the City Council on the earliest available agenda. A fee is charged for appeals. Copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to any item of business referred to on the agenda are available for public inspection the Monday before each regularly scheduled meeting at City Hall, located at No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma CA, (707) 938-3681. Any documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been distributed will be made available for inspection at the Administrative Assistant office, No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma CA during regular business hours. If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on the agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Administrative Assistant, at or prior to the public hearing. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk (707) 933-2216. Notification 48-hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. City of Sonoma/Planning Commission Agenda Page 2 CITY OF SONOMA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 9, 2016 Community Meeting Room, 177 First Street West, Sonoma, CA Draft MINUTES Chair Cribb called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Roll Call: Present: Chair Cribb, Comms. Wellander, Heneveld, Willers, Sek Absent: Comms. McDonald, Chair Felder Others Present: Planning Director Goodison, Associate Planner Atkins Administrative Assistant Morris Chair Cribb stated that no new items would be heard after 10:30 p.m. unless the Planning Commission so decides. Any decisions made by the Planning Commission can be appealed within 15 days to the City Council. He reminded everyone to turn off cell phones and pagers. Comm. Willers led the Pledge of Allegiance. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Comm. Willers made a motion to approve the minutes of April 14, 2016, subject to the correction noted by Comm. Wellander. Comm. Wellander seconded. The motion was unanimously approved (4-0, with Comm. Sek abstaining). Comm. Willers made a motion to approve the minutes of May 12, 2016. Comm. Cribb seconded. The motion was unanimously approved (4-0, with Comm. Sek abstaining). CHANGES TO AGENDA ORDER: None CORRESPONDENCE: Item 1 staff revision; late mail on Items 2 and 3 from David Eichar and Mary Martinez; issues update. Item #1 – Public Hearing – Consideration of a Temporary Use Permit to allow outdoor live music in association with a wine club event from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. on Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 389 Fourth Street East. Applicant/Property Owner: Sebastiano Winery /Foley Family Wines, Inc. Associate Planner Atkins presented staff’s report. Chair Cribb opened the item for public comment. Gary Geiger, Senior Hospitality Manager/Sebastiani Winery appreciated the consideration for having this one-time event. Comm. Willers asked about the capacity of the parking lot. Mr. Geiger stated that in his understanding, there were 129 parking spaces. Comm. Sek asked how event attendance would be controlled. The applicant stated that it is was being done through an RSVP process and that only those who made a reservation would be admitted. The applicant responded that wine club members would pre-register for the event. He stated that the estimated attendance represents the total over the course of the event and he expects there would be fewer people on the site at any one time. Chair Cribb closed the item for public comment. Comm. Wellander supported the application in light of the proposed conditions of approval since there have been similar events at the winery with no recent noise complaints. He noted that if it is not managed well, the next event may be evaluated differently. Comm. Willers stated that although he had some reservations about the number of attendees, he did not object to the hours or the proposed music. He agreed that if problems occurred, that would affect how future requests are reviewed. Comm. Coleman concurred. Comm. Sek concurred with her fellow Commissioners and felt that all 600 people would not attend at the same time. Chair Cribb agreed, especially as no neighbors have voiced objection. Comm. Willers made a motion to approve the Temporary Use Permit as requested. Comm. Coleman seconded. The motion was unanimously approved (5-0). Item 2 – Public Hearing – Consideration of a Use Permit to convert a second floor space into a vacation rental unit within the Sonoma Court Shops complex at 533 First Street East. Applicant/Property Owner: STRATAap Architecture/Sonoma Court Shops, Inc. Planning Director Goodison presented staff’s report. Comm. Coleman questioned if four occupants are allowed in the one-bedroom unit. Planning Director Goodison agreed with the concern, suggesting that if the Use Permit is approved, occupancy should be limited to two persons. Chair Cribb opened the item for public comment. Terrance Redmond, representing Sonoma Court Shops, noted that the reference to four persons was an error ant that occupancy should be limited to two. He stated that he was available to answer questions and in his view that proposal complies with the requirements of June 9, 2016 Page 2 of 7 the Development Code. He envisions a greater amount of revenue generated for the City by the proposed vacation rental use than other available options. The demand for office use within the complex has slowed over the years, but there is increased demand for short-term rentals. Comm. Wellander asked about the number of long-term residential apartment spaces within the Sonoma Court Shops complex. Mr. Redmond stated there were approximately 6-8 residential apartments within Sonoma Court Shops. Chair Cribb noted that changing economics can guide a property owner’s business decisions and asked the applicant if he could provide specific metrics as to the difference between the financial performance of the space as an office versus that of a vacation rental. Mr. Redmond stated that he could not provide those specifics, but noted that as he mentioned before, there is simply much less demand for office space. In the future that might change, in which case other uses might come into the forefront. Jim Bohar, resident in the Historic district, asked whether the provisions of the Historic Overlay Zone had any implications with regard to the this proposed change in use.
Recommended publications
  • 7 2008 Code CA County Sonoma Code
    NPSForm 10-900 QMBNo. 1024-0018 (Oct.1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service MAY - 7 2008 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NA1 This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instruction IFI HUW lu C National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1 . Name of Property historic name Orange Lawn other names/site number Young Mansion 2. Location street & number 645 Charles Van Damme Way N/A n not for publication city or town Sonoma vicinity state California code CA county Sonoma code 097 zip code 95476 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority undecthaNal onai Historic Preservation Act of 1 986, as amended, ! hereby certify that this E nomination n requesl/or determination of elLgibiity r leets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic IPI ICSB and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 35 CFP Part 60. In my opinion, the property S meeta U qoes not meet the Nitionkl! tegister Criteria. 1 recommend that this property be considered significant d nationally H] statevw ie to locally.
    [Show full text]
  • SONOMA PLAZA (National Historic Landmark) AND/OR HISTORIC: Old Sonoma Or Sonoma Pueblo Filliliiiiiilli^Iiiilii^ STREET AND.NUMBER
    Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE: (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE California COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Sonoma INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) iiiiiitw C OMMON: SONOMA PLAZA (National Historic Landmark) AND/OR HISTORIC: Old Sonoma or Sonoma Pueblo filliliiiiiilli^iiiilii^ STREET AND.NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: CONGFSESSIONAL DISTRICT: Sonoma i'irst District STATE CODE COUNT Y: CODE California 06 Sonoma 097 ||$g;:;:::fc:liji3&&^^ll^SSI^ijfSit:*:^^ ACCESSIBLE CATEGORY OWNERSH.P STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC 5H District Q Building CD Public Public Acquisition: X] Occupied Yes: jjg Restricted D Site Q Structure D Private D In Process [ | Unoccupied (jg Unrestricted CD Object BCl Bot'1 D B *i n 3 Conside red | | Preservation work in progress a NO PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) \ I Agricultural (jjjj Government [jjj Park Q Transportation d) Comments EJ3 .Commercial CD Industrial [jjjjj Private Residence D Other (Specify) d] Educational CD Mi itary [g Religious I | Entertainment [jj] Museum Q Scientific liiiiiiiiiiiiliiii! .-^rr,,,,- OWNER-S NAME: Department of Barks and Recreation STATE- City of Sonoma, California Sonoma State Historic "Park STREET AND NUMBER: CitV Of SOHOIDdEL Ifo 1 7116 l&L&ZQ, California Sonoma S.H.P., P.O. Box 16? CITY OR TOWN: ST ATE: CODE Sonoma California 3660 |;ilii!$iiliiii:®i^ilii» COURTHOUSE-, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: TY:COUN Sonoma County Courthouse 5? STREET AND NUMBER: 0 Cl TY OR TOWN: ST ATE CODE Santa Rosa California 3^90 ;i:i:::;%;::^ TITLE OF SURVEY: /\ V-" "•'"'" A., •\ /.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property Located at 19315 Highway 12, Sonoma, Sonoma County, California
    Agenda Item #9.1: A HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19315 HIGHWAY 12, SONOMA, SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: Andrew Dobbs-Kramer Licensing and Compliance Director SPARC SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc 1141 Gravenstein Highway South, Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-823-7400 March 25, 2021 www.evans-deshazo.com Page 170 of 353 Agenda Item #9.1: Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PROPERTY LOCATION ............................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY SETTING .............................................................................................................................. 2 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT .................................................................................................................... 2 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Cultural Resource Inventories ............................................................................................................................. 4 Online Research ................................................................................................................................................. 4 HISTORICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Evaluation of the Property at 20455 5Th Street East, in Unincorporated Sonoma County, California
    HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION OF THE PROPERTY AT 20455 5TH STREET EAST, IN UNINCORPORATED SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: DeNova Homes, Inc. c/o Trent Sanson, Vice President of Land Acquisition & Entitlements [email protected] SUBMITTED BY: Stacey De Shazo, M.A. Principal Architectural Historian [email protected] Evans & De Shazo, Inc 1141 Gravenstein Highway South, Sebastopol, CA 95472 707-823-7400 February 12, 2020 www.evans-deshazo.com Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................................................................... 3 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT .......................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 RESEARCH ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Cultural Resource Inventories ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Bear Flag Revolt of 1846: Today's Narratives of Sonoma County's Past by Rudy Alexander Dinarte a Thesis Subm
    Remembering the Bear Flag Revolt of 1846: Today’s Narratives of Sonoma County’s Past by Rudy Alexander Dinarte A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Cultural Resources Management Committee Members: Alexis Boutin, Ph.D., Chair Steve Estes, Ph.D. Margaret Purser, Ph.D. December 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 By Rudy Alexander Dinarte ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTER’S THESIS I grant permission for the print or digital reproduction of parts of this thesis without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorb the cost and provide proper acknowledgment of authorship. Permission to reproduce this thesis in its entirety must be obtained from me. Rudy A. Dinarte December 11, 2020 iii ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: In this thesis, I present a collaborative, community-based approach to a cultural resources management-style project. Typically, consultation is limited to descendant communities, but this collaborative approach includes a more expansive definition of stakeholder. In 2014, two members of the Santa Rosa Rural Cemetery Preservation Committee resumed a quest to locate the burials of two casualties of the Bear Flag Revolt of 1846. While their remains were not found, this project was still able to initiate a larger conversation about how Sonoma County’s shared past is remembered and how archaeologists could approach community involvement in future projects. Procedure: Through oral history interviews and site visits in Sonoma County, I investigated how the Bear Flag Revolt is remembered and how historical narratives of the Revolt have been created.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sonoma Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission AGENDA Regular Meeting of November 21, 2017 - 6:30 P.M
    City of Sonoma Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission AGENDA Regular Meeting of November 21, 2017 - 6:30 P.M. Community Meeting Room, 177 First Street West Sonoma, CA 95476 Meeting Length: No new items will be heard by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission after 10:30 PM, unless the Commission, by majority vote, specifically decides to continue reviewing items. If an item is not heard due to the length of the meeting, the Commission will attempt to schedule a special meeting for the following week. If a special meeting is necessary, potential dates will be established at the close of this meeting, and a date set as soon as possible thereafter. CALL TO ORDER –Chair, Christopher Johnson Commissioners: Kelso Barnett Leslie Tippell Bill Essert Micaelia Randolph COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Presentations by audience members on items not appearing on the agenda. MINUTES Minutes from the meeting of September 19, 2017. CORRESPONDENCE ITEM #1 – Sign Review Project Location: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 153 West Napa Street REQUEST: Commission discretion. Consideration of a wall sign and a General Plan Designation: two window signs for a commercial Commercial (C) CEQA Status: building (Smashmallow). Categorically Exempt Zoning: Applicant: Planning Area: Fastsigns of Sonoma County Downtown District Base: Commercial (C) Staff: Wendy Atkins Overlay: Historic (/H) ITEM #2 – Design Review Project Location: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 579 First Street East REQUEST Commission discretion. Consideration of design review General Plan Designation: (alteration) of proposed Commercial (C) CEQA Status: modifications and an addition to a Categorically Exempt residence. Zoning: Planning Area: Applicant: Downtown District Robert Baumann Base: Commercial (C) Overlay: Historic (/H) Staff: Wendy Atkins ITEM #3 – Design Review Project Location: RECOMMENDED ACTION: 550 Second Street West REQUEST: Commission discretion.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma Valley General Facts FINAL
    GENERAL FACTS Overview & Contact Information Overview: Located in the heart of Northern California wine country, Sonoma Valley is a 17-mile long valley within Sonoma County that encompasses the city of Sonoma and the villages of The Springs, Glen Ellen, Carneros, Bennett Valley and Kenwood. A year-round destination, Sonoma Valley is home to more than 100 premium wineries; a variety of lodging options ranging from luxury hotels to charming bed and breakfasts; award-winning olive oil producers; breweries; artisan shopping; delicious dining; 13,000 acres of state and regional parks; world-class spas and endless discovery. The town of Sonoma is the birthplace of the state of California, as well as the state’s wine industry. Sonoma Valley is home to the state’s oldest commercial and oldest family-run wineries, and 85 five percent of wineries within Sonoma Valley are family owned. The destination, which is easily accessible from all major Northern California airports, encourages all visitors to partake in its wine country lifestyle and enjoy a vacation that is fun, friendly and beautiful. Contact & Social Media: SonomaValley.com Instagram // @sonoma_valley Facebook // @ExperienceSonomaValley Twitter // @sonoma_valley YouTube // @SonomaValleyVB Key Contacts Tim Zahner, Executive Director, Experience Sonoma Valley, California David Wells, PR & Communications Manager, Experience Sonoma Valley, California Media Contact B Public Relations (303) 658-0605 [email protected] Quick Facts Location: Sonoma Valley is located 45 minutes north of San Francisco, by way of Highway 12. Bordered by the Mayacamas to the west and the Sonoma Mountains to the east, the 17- mile long valley begins in the north at the edge of Santa Rosa, and extends 17 miles south to Carneros.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior I ( F ~ National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior I ( f ~ National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See i struc1i4"1l}l-Jf\~. · . · Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does I epiflJtra.ilie documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and a as · categories and subcategories from the instructions. NOV 2 1 l'.014 1. Name of Property Historic name: Sonoma Valle Woman s lub Other names/site number: Name of related multiple property------------------------- listing: NIA (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: 574 1st Street East City or town: Sonoma State: .....-'-C-"--A_____ County: Sonoma Not For Publication : □ Vicinity: □ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this .X...nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _x__ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: _national statewide llocal Applicable National Register Criteria: lA _B .X.,C _D Jenan Saunders, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Date California State Office of Historic Preservation State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property _meets _does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion, Consideration, and Possible Action to Adopt a Resolution to Approve the Recycled Water Feasibility Analysis (RWFA) Prepared by GHD Inc
    City of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Meeting: City Council - Mar 05 2018 Department Staff Contact Public Works Colleen Ferguson, Public Works Director/City Engineer Agenda Item Title Discussion, Consideration, and Possible Action to Adopt a Resolution to Approve the Recycled Water Feasibility Analysis (RWFA) Prepared by GHD Inc. Summary Water Recycling Water is continually recycled in nature through the water cycle. Modern wastewater treatment replicates the natural recycling process to restore large quantities of water quickly and effectively. In Sonoma, water from sinks, toilets, and indoor plumbing travels through pipes to the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District (SVCSD) wastewater treatment facility, where it is treated to remove bacteria and pollutants. Tertiary-treated recycled water undergoes extensive testing to ensure it meets the strict standards set by the State of California. In Sonoma Valley, recycled water is used to irrigate more than 2,000 acres of premium grapes in the Carneros appellation. Recycled water is also used for irrigation of dairy fodder crops. In other areas, recycled water is mainly used for irrigation of crops and large landscaped areas such as golf courses, athletic fields, commercial and industrial parks, and cemeteries. Recycled water is transported through a system of purple pipes, completely separate from drinking water and wastewater systems. Previous Reports and Analysis In 2005, the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) prepared a Sonoma Valley Recycled Water Feasibility Study on behalf of SVCSD, the Valley of the Moon Water District (VOMWD), and the City, and in consultation with the Sonoma Ecology Center, to evaluate the feasibility of recycled water use in Sonoma Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Landmarks Program
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS PROGRAM LIST OF NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS BY STATE July 2015 GEORGE WASHINGTOM MASONIC NATIONAL MEMORIAL, ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA (NHL, JULY 21, 2015) U. S. Department of the Interior NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS PROGRAM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE LISTING OF NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS BY STATE ALABAMA (38) ALABAMA (USS) (Battleship) ......................................................................................................................... 01/14/86 MOBILE, MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA APALACHICOLA FORT SITE ........................................................................................................................ 07/19/64 RUSSELL COUNTY, ALABAMA BARTON HALL ............................................................................................................................................... 11/07/73 COLBERT COUNTY, ALABAMA BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH, PARSONAGE, AND GUARD HOUSE .......................................................... 04/05/05 BIRMINGHAM, JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BOTTLE CREEK SITE UPDATED DOCUMENTATION 04/05/05 ...................................................................... 04/19/94 BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA BROWN CHAPEL A.M.E. CHURCH .............................................................................................................. 12/09/97 SELMA, DALLAS COUNTY, ALABAMA CITY HALL ...................................................................................................................................................... 11/07/73 MOBILE, MOBILE COUNTY,
    [Show full text]
  • Trial Lawyers Section Summer Meeting Macarthur Place Inn & Spa Sonoma, California July 27 – July 30, 2014
    NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Section Chair A. MICHAEL FURMAN ESQ. Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP New York City Program Chair PETER C. KOPFF, ESQ. Peter C. Kopff, LLC Garden City NYSBA Trial Lawyers Section Summer Meeting MacArthur Place Inn & Spa Sonoma, California July 27 – July 30, 2014 Attendance at this meeting offers up to 6.0 MCLE credit hours – including 1.0 in ethics and 5.0 in professional practice for experienced attorneys only. IMPORTANT INFORMATION MCLE CREDIT: The New York State Bar Association’s ACCOMMODATIONS FOR PERSONS WITH Meetings Department has been certified by the NYS DISABILITIES: NYSBA welcomes participation by Continuing Legal Education Board as an accredited individuals with disabilities. NYSBA is committed to provider of continuing legal education in the State of complying with all applicable laws that prohibit New York. Under New York’s MCLE rule, this discrimination against individuals on the basis of program has been approved for a total of 6.0 disability in the full and equal enjoyment of its goods, credit hours; 1.0 hours in ethics and 5.0 hours in services, programs, activities, facilities, privileges, professional practice. This is NOT a transitional advantages, or accommodations. To request auxiliary program and is NOT suitable for MCLE credit for aids or services or if you have any questions regarding newly-admitted attorneys. accessibility, please contact Catheryn Teeter at New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, New York 12207 or [email protected]. DISCOUNTS AND SCHOLARSHIPS: New York State Bar Association members and non-members may receive financial aid to attend this program.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Cultural Resources
    3. Affected Environment / Environmental Setting, Environmental Consequences / Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.12 Cultural Resources This section describes the existing cultural resources in the action area, the applicable regulations at the federal, state, and local levels, and the potential impacts to cultural resources from the North Bay Water Recycling Program (NBWRP). Information for the section was adapted from the Cultural Resources Survey Report completed for the NBWRA (ESA, 2008). The Impacts and Mitigation Measures section defines significance criteria used for the impact assessment and presents a discussion of potential project-related impacts. Determination of significance of impacts in this EIR/EIS apply only to CEQA, not to NEPA. 3.12.1 Affected Environment/Setting Area of Potential Effects The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the NBWRP is defined as “the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist” (36 CFR 800.16[b]). In consultation with the Bureau of Reclamation, an archaeological APE and an architectural/structural APE was determined for the NBWRP (Welch, 2008). Depending upon the project components, the archaeological APE has been determined as the area of direct impact for the NBWRP. For example, trenching for installing the recycled water pipelines would require a maximum width of three feet and a vertical depth of up to six feet; therefore the vertical APE would be six feet. For the NBWRP, an APE of 50-foot wide corridor (25-foot radius from centerline) would be assumed in undeveloped areas to accommodate for areas for staging and spoils.
    [Show full text]