Semantic Definitions a Collocational Approach To
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Boris Hlebec A COLLOCATIONAL APPROACH TO SEMANTIC DEFINITIONS Fokus – Forum za interkulturnu komunikaciju Boris Hlebec [email protected] A Collocational Approach to Semantic Definitions Table of contents Typographical conventions Abbreviations Glossary of terms Introduction 1 Semantic definitions 1.1 An overview Tests for definitions But-test Connection between the primary and secondary meanings Redundancy and pleonasm Zeugma Entailment Paradox Good-test 1.2 Typicality Tests for typicality Idiomatic expressions But not-test Obligatory adverbs Unmodified nouns Hedges Canonical features 2 Collocation 2.1 Defining collocation 2 Directive and analysis Classifying collocations Lexical and grammatical collocations Specialized language Importance of collocations Compounds Related collocations Formal presentation of collocates Lexical fields 2.2 Semantic roles Agent Patient Experiencer Objective Stimulus Instrument Recipient and donor Comitative Result Locative Source Goal and Locatum Origin Actor Essive Causation Equivocation of roles Speaker 2.3 Aspectualities Stative verbs Privative verbs Relational verbs Dynamic verbs Durative verbs Punctual verbs Achievements Ambient verbs Benefactive verbs 3 Evaluative verbs 2.4 The collocational method Background of the collocational approach The procedure Marker and distinguisher Agreement of defining semes Transference Semantic tailoring 2.5 Transitivity Object Double object Lexical-syntactic alternation Ditransitive verbs Verbs of transfer Triple object Transitivity conversion Unaccusatives Detransitivization (Middle voice) Reciprocal and reflexive verbs 3 Defining parts of speech and grammatical categories 3.1 Function words Articles The definite article The indefinite article Prepositions Conjunctions Pronouns A portrait of it Personal pronoun it1 Phenomenon it2 Ambient it3 Emphatic it4 Anticipatory it5 Conclusion 3.2 Syntactic patterns and grammatical categories 4 Syntactic patterns Countability Non-finite clause To be Be + being To-infinitive Bare infinitive Modal verbs Passive Subjunctive That-clause 3.3 Adjectives Connecting adjectives with nouns Indirect connection Indirect connection via entity Non-inherent connection Partonimic connection Attributive and predicative uses of adjectives Attributive adjectives Classifying adjectives Intensifying adjectives Limiter adjectives Predicative adjectives Post-nominal adjectives Order of adjectives Connecting adjectives with prepositions A portrait of wild “Strong” adjectives Stance adjectives Discussion 3.4 Verbs Connecting verbs with adjectives “Legal” verbs Performatives Conclusion Factive and non-factive verbs “Strong” verbs Have 5 “Light” verbs Linking verbs: a portrait of remain 3.5 Nouns Partonomy Some relations of nouns with adjectives and verbs Partitivity Partitive transitivity Connexity “Strong” nouns “Legal” nouns 3.6 Adverbs Intensifying adverbs 4 Semantic hierarchy 4.1 Hyponymy and redundancy rules 5 General conclusions Notes References Index of lexical items Subject index Typographical conventions * An asterisk marks an anomalous or deviant connection of words. ? A question mark indicates a possibly deviant phrase or sentence ?? A double question mark indicates a dubious phrase or sentence ! An initial exclamation mark indicates a dis- harmonious connection of words in a particular meaning, but acceptable in another meaning. 6 ‘ ’ Single quotes enclose semes, i.e. meaning content. [ ] Within definitions square brackets enclose redundant features. In quotations they signal inserted elements. < > Angular brackets enclose semantic definitions. { } Braces enclose typical semes. Thus, ‘true {and good}’ should be understood as obligatory ‘true’ and typically ‘good’. < ( ) > end of §3.5.0 Round brackets within a noun definition are used to represent two different sememes sharing a part of content, the one that is outside the brackets. With other parts of speech, the round brackets indicate an alternative alloseme; e.g. with1 <sthx | existing / making same phenomenon | at same time (and space) as «sthy»>. Usually participants involved in with1 share time and space, but owing to modern technology this need not be the case. When one speaker is talking with another over the telephone, they are talking at the same time but in different spaces. The definition of in1 <using - occupying «┌space - area of┐ thing - substance - (lack of) light»> covers both in the sun and in the shadow. # # Hashes enclose directives (content of noun slots). #( ) #… §3.3.1c I Round brackets within a subject directive enclose a directive expansion leading to indirect connection. #(( ))#… §3.3.1 d Double brackets within a subject directive indicate a doubly indirect connection. 7 …(#) (#) §2.5.1a ii Bracketed hashes of a single object directive indicate a possible intransitive (pseudointransitive or “absolute”) use of an otherwise transitive verb. …# #...# # §2.5.1b II Two pairs of object directive hashes without brackets indicate two object slots of which either or both can surface. (#) (#)…# # §2.5.1b III Bracketed hashes of the first of two object directives indicate an indirect object. (#) (#)...(#) (#) §2.5.1b Two pairs of bracketed hashes indicate two object slots of which only one can surface at a time. …(#) (#)...(#) (#)…(#) (#) §2.5.1c Three pairs of bracketed hashes indicate a triple object. <# (#…#) #> §2.5.2a Round brackets within a definition of a verb, straddling the subject slot and ‘make’ of the analysis, indicate an unaccusative verb. <# # ( ) > The use of round brackets within the analyses of adjectives and verbs indicates omissible parts, which do not constitute a definition proper, but still provide useful information on certain collocators. They can also signal cases when speakers’ opinions are divided about acceptability, or a single speaker is hesitant or inconsistent, as with unexpected and ridiculous (§ 3.6.3 d). < ! ! > §3.2.6 Exclamation marks flank the content proper of an infinitive within its definition. 8 < « » > §3.1.2 Angle quotation marks enclose a directrix (corresponding to a prepositional object) within a definition of a preposition. < [ ] > Square brackets enclose (i) an adverb proper within its definition (see §3.6); (ii) a redundant seme within a verb definition (see §2.2.3); (iii) additions to texts quoted or paraphrased from other sources. <#┌ ┐…#> §3.3.1c III Two mirror-image angles enclose a directive expansion leading to the partonomic connection. < - > A hyphen indicates alternative semes, one potentially exchanged for the other, e.g. ‘heat - light’ = ‘heat’ or ‘light’. A hyphen separating a braced seme represents an alternative between an untypical and a typical seme (e.g. ‘{good} - true’ is to be read as typically ‘good’ or nontypically ‘true’. < / > A slash indicates alternative semes exchanging elements with more than one metalinguistic word (e.g. ‘because of / concerning sth good’ = ‘because of sth good’ or ‘concerning sth good’). < | > The common content is to the left of a single bar and the alternative content is to the right (e.g. ‘weak socially because | sthx is viewed as bad/sby did sth bad’ = ‘weak socially because sthx is viewed as bad + weak socially because sby did sth bad’). || §2.4.4 A double bar is used to separate dis- tinguishers from markers. x, y, z Subscripts within definitions indicate identical or different referents. It is the order of appearances that is important here and the identity within the particular 9 definition. No correlation of subscripts across different definitions is intended. For example, the preposition to9 has in its definition: <sbx being in social role working for «sby with social power»>, while in the definition of the verb appoint, whose abridged version reads <#sbx# using sbx’s social power to make sbx’s language be experienced as strong and true makes (#)sby(#) come to be in social role of #sby# working for sbz>, sbx of to has become sby of appoint, whereas the previous sby changed to sbz In a concrete case: chairman (sbx) to the board (sby), but They (sbx) appointed him (sby) chairman (sby) to the board (sbz). book2 A numerical subscript below a lexeme form identifies a particular lexeme’s sememe. SMALL CAPITALS indicate: (i) semantic roles; (ii) syntactic patterns, such as N + V + N + N; (iii) conceptual meta- phors, e.g. PERSON FOR X. Underlined indicates (i) the content proper of a pre- position or of a conjunction within its definition (see §§3.1.2 and 3.1.3); (ii) the content of a pertainym, the lexeme from which another word is derived, carried over to the definition of the derived word (e.g. in the definition of the verb bait, see §3.3.2a I), or the content of the primary sememe transferred to the definition of a secondary sememe, (e.g. ride in §2.1.5 c); (iii) the content of a non-finite clause (see §3.2.3). Italics are used to mark language forms. Within defi- nitions, they indicate pragmatic elements, like this or using a lot of words. 10 Abbreviations adj adjective AE American English BE British English DO direct object Inf infinitive IO indirect object n noun Past Part past participle sb somebody, human living thing sb sp an implicit speaker (or an implicit writer, pro- ducer of speech or text), the source of subjective attitudes in definitions – see §2.2.18 sbh the hearer (interlocutor, addressee) sbindef people in general or an unspecified indi- vidual sbmore than one more than one person, at least two people sbwith power sbx invested with authority to make sby do as sbx wants, i.e. strongly (= intensely) influential 11 sth something (includes