DOCSLIB.ORG

Neutron Induced Fission Fragment Angular Distributions and Momentum Transfer Measured with the Niffte Fission Time Projection Chamber

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neutron Induced Fission Fragment Angular Distributions and Momentum Transfer Measured with the Niffte Fission Time Projection Chamber NEUTRON INDUCED FISSION FRAGMENT ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS AND MOMENTUM TRANSFER MEASURED WITH THE NIFFTE FISSION TIME PROJECTION CHAMBER by David Hensle c Copyright by David Hensle, 2019 All Rights Reserved A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Applied Physics). Golden, Colorado Date Signed: David Hensle Signed: Dr. Uwe Greife Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date Signed: Dr. Uwe Greife Professor and Head Department of Physics ii ABSTRACT Nuclear fission is the process by which a large nucleus splits into two heavy fragments and is often induced by an incident neutron. Understanding the probability by which an incident neutron will cause fission, i.e. the neutron induced fission cross section, is an important input into fission applications such as nuclear energy and stockpile stewardship. The Neutron Induced Fission Fragment Tracking Experiment (NIFFTE) Collaboration built a fission time projection chamber (fissionTPC) to study the fission process in a novel way in the hopes of achieving unprecedented precision on fission cross section measurements. With the fissionTPC’s ability to do three-dimensional tracking of fission fragments and other ionizing radiation, systematics of previous cross section measurements using fission chambers can be further explored. Because the fissionTPC records a wealth of data for every fission event, other physics can be measured concurrently with the cross section. In particular, fission fragment angular distributions and the linear momentum transferred from the incident neutron to the target nucleus as a function of incident neutron energy from 130 keV to 250 MeV will be the focus of this work. Angular anisotropy values for 235U and 238U and neutron linear momentum transfer for 235U, 238U, and 239Pu will be presented. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................... iii LISTOFFIGURES .....................................vii LISTOFTABLES ......................................xiv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................xv CHAPTER 1 NUCLEAR FISSION BACKGROUND . 1 1.1 FissionBasics .................................... 1 1.2 NeutronInducedFission ............................. .7 1.2.1 NIFFTECrossSectionFormulation . 10 1.3 FissionFragmentAngularAnisotropy . .... 12 1.4 NeutronLinearMomentumTransfer . 14 1.5 Motivation for Precise Fission Measurements . .........16 CHAPTER 2 NIFFTE TIME PROJECTION CHAMBER . 18 2.1 Fission Time Projection Chamber Hardware and Operation . .........18 2.1.1 ElectronicsandTriggering . 20 2.1.2 FissionTPCFillGas ............................ 24 2.2 ActinideTargets .................................. 28 2.3 NeutronSourceandTimeofFlightMeasurement . ..... 32 2.3.1 CarbonFilterData............................. 34 2.3.2 NeutronBeamWraparound . 35 CHAPTER 3 TPC DATA RECONSTRUCTION AND CORRECTIONS . 37 iv 3.1 DataReconstruction: SignalstoTracks . ........37 3.2 NeutronTimeofFlightReconstruction . ..... 42 3.3 CorrectionstoData............................... 43 3.3.1 Californium-252Measurement . 44 3.3.2 PadSaturation ............................... 45 3.3.3 ElectronDriftSpeed . 50 3.3.4 ElectronDiffusionAnisotropy . 52 3.4 CorrectionParametersAppliedtoTargets . ....... 59 CHAPTER 4 NEUTRON LINEAR MOMENTUM TRANSFER . 61 4.1 Measuring Fragment Folding Angle Distributions . .........62 4.2 SimulationofFragmentOpeningAngles . ..... 64 4.3 LinearMomentumTransferError . .... 69 4.4 Linear Momentum Transfer Results and Discussion . .........75 CHAPTER 5 FISSION FRAGMENT ANGULAR ANISOTROPY . 80 5.1 MeasuredAnisotropy............................... 80 5.2 UncertaintyBudget................................ 84 5.3 MultipleAnisotropyMeasurements . ..... 92 5.4 MeasuredAnisotropyResults . 96 CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK . 102 REFERENCESCITED .................................. 106 APPENDIX A CONVERSION BETWEEN LAB FRAME AND CENTER OF MASSFRAME .............................. 117 APPENDIX B DERIVATION OF THE ELECTRON DIFFUSION ANISOTROPY CORRECTION .............................. 120 v APPENDIXCTABULATEDDATA . 124 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 A cartoon depiction of neutron induced fission of 235U. ...........2 Figure 1.2 A visual representation of each of the terms in 1.1 for the semi-empirical mass formula describing the binding energy associated withtheliquiddropmodel.. .3 Figure 1.3 (a) Potential energy curves as a function of L2 deformation (minimized with respect to the L4 component) for different nuclei calculated by the liquid drop model (dashed curves) and the liquid drop model with shell corrections added (solid curves). Figure from . (b) Nuclear deformation described by the second and fourth order Legendre polynomial components,from. ...............................5 Figure 1.4 A geometrical interpretation of the partial cross sections for thermal neutrons incident on a 235Utarget. ......................8 Figure 1.5 Fission fragment mass yields vary as a function of incident neutron energy where symmetric fission is more preferred at high incident neutronenergies.Figurefrom.. 9 Figure 1.6 Depiction of the total angular momentum J and projection M and K onto the beam axis and symmetry axis, respectively. From these quantum numbers, the angular distribution of the fission fragments can bepredicted. ................................. 12 Figure 2.1 Schematic representation of the fission time projectionchamber. 19 Figure 2.2 (a) A schematic representation of an alpha particle’s ionization charge cloud being drifted to the anode and amplified by the MICROMEGAS. (b) A projection of a charge cloud onto the hexagonal readout pads on theanodes.................................... 20 Figure 2.3 (a) A picture of one of the two highly segmented anodes. (b) The fissionTPC fully assembled with all of the readout electronics attached. The drift chamber is 15 cm in diameter and the central cathode is 5.4 cm fromeachanode. ............................. 21 vii Figure 2.4 (Left) Picture of an EtherDAQ card. (Center) A schematic layout of an EtherDAQ card containing the analog amplifiers on the bottom where the input signal enters, and the digital electronics and fiber readout on top. (Right) Work flow diagram of the FPGA firmware that controls thedataflowfortriggeringandprocessing. 22 Figure 2.5 A representation of how low energy Argon recoils can produce more ionization density in the electron avalanche than a fission fragment and causesparking.Source.. 27 Figure 2.6 (a) A picture of the Plutonium side of the 239Pu/235U thick backed aluminum target before insertion into the fissionTPC. (b)Start vertices for alpha particles emitted from a thick target with 235U on each side. Contamination of small quantities of 239Pu can be seen on the cathode. 29 Figure 2.7 List of targets from which neutron induced fission data was taken. Actinides include 235U (blue), 238U (purple), and 239Pu(green). Aluminum target holders are 2cm in diameter and actinide deposits are drawnroughlytoscale. 31 Figure 2.8 On overview of the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center. The location of the 90L WNR beamline where the TPC is operated is circled in red. 32 Figure 2.9 Neutron time of flight spectrum for fission from a U235 target. The insert shows the photofission peak and fit to determine a time of flight resolution. Neutron wraparound is shown as the red line. ..... 33 Figure 2.10 (a) Inelastic neutron scattering cross section for Carbon-12 showing strong resonance feature at 2.078 MeV, from ENDF/B-VIII . (b) Neutron time of flight spectrum as measured by the fissionTPC showing location of the Carbon-12 resonance at around 400 ns. .....34 Figure 2.11 (a) The end of the last micropulse is fit with a sum of two decaying exponentials. This fit is then “folded” to get a prediction for the number of wraparound neutrons. (b) Percent of fission events caused by wraparound neutrons for a 235U target as a function of neutron energy calculated by taking the ratio of counts above and below the red wraparoundlineinFigure2.9. 36 Figure 3.1 Signals from an alpha particle and the subsequent differentiation used in the digit forming process. Considering all of the pads have signals occurring at almost the exact same time, this set of signals corresponds to an alpha particle that was emitted very parallel to the anode plane, equating to a polar angle of cos(θ)veryclosetozero. 38 viii Figure 3.2 A typical fission event from a thin carbon backed target. Along with the back to back fission fragments, small tracks from inelastic scattering of neutrons off protons in the gas are also visible. The red lines through the digits are the assigned tracks. Color scale denotes the ADC (charge)valueofeachdigit. 39 Figure 3.3 Track length vs total track energy is a commonly used parameter space toperformparticleidentification. 41 Figure 3.4 Raw high speed cathode signal (blue) induced from a fission event and its trapezoidal filtered counterpart (red). Where a straight line fit to the rising edge of the filtered signal intersects with 0 is taken as the timeofflightfortheevent. 43 Figure 3.5 (a) Fission fragment start vertices and (b) Length vs ADC from the 252Cf source taken at the 210V MICROGMEGAS setting . 44 Figure 3.6 (a) Saturated signal readouts from the pads for a fission fragment directed towards the anode. (b) A cut on the end portion of a charge cloud projected on the pads showing the hole created by the saturated signals. ....................................46 Figure 3.7 ADC vs cos θ for 252Cf fragment events at the four different gain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ternary Fission and Quasi-Fission of Superheavy Nuclei and Giant Nuclear Systems
    June 17, 2010 18:24 Proceedings Trim Size: 9in x 6in zagrebaev_¯ssion_2010b TERNARY FISSION AND QUASI-FISSION OF SUPERHEAVY NUCLEI AND GIANT NUCLEAR SYSTEMS V.I. ZAGREBAEV, A.V. KARPOV Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia WALTER GREINER Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, J.W. Goethe-UniversitÄat,Germany We found that a true ternary ¯ssion with formation of a heavy third fragment (a new kind of radioactivity) is quite possible for superheavy nuclei due to the strong shell e®ects leading to a three-body clusterization with the two doubly magic tin- like cores. The three-body quasi-¯ssion process could be even more pronounced for giant nuclear systems formed in collisions of heavy actinide nuclei. In this case a three-body clusterization might be proved experimentally by detection of two coincident lead-like fragments in low-energy U+U collisions. 1. Introduction Today the term \ternary ¯ssion" is commonly used to denote the process of formation of light charged particle accompanied ¯ssion 1. This is a rare process (less than 1%) relative to binary ¯ssion, see Fig. 1. As can be seen the probability of such a process decreases sharply with increasing mass number of the accompanied third particle. These light particles are emitted almost perpendicularly with respect to the ¯ssion axis (equatorial emission) 1. It is interpreted as an indication that the light ternary particles are emitted from the neck region and are accelerated by the Coulomb ¯elds of both heavy fragments. In contrast to such a process, the term \true ternary ¯ssion" is used for a simultaneous decay of a heavy nucleus into three fragments of not very di®erent mass 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data Iaea, Vienna, 2000 Iaea-Tecdoc-1168 Issn 1011–4289
    IAEA-TECDOC-1168 Compilation and evaluation of fission yield nuclear data Final report of a co-ordinated research project 1991–1996 December 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Data Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria COMPILATION AND EVALUATION OF FISSION YIELD NUCLEAR DATA IAEA, VIENNA, 2000 IAEA-TECDOC-1168 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2000 Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 2000 FOREWORD Fission product yields are required at several stages of the nuclear fuel cycle and are therefore included in all large international data files for reactor calculations and related applications. Such files are maintained and disseminated by the Nuclear Data Section of the IAEA as a member of an international data centres network. Users of these data are from the fields of reactor design and operation, waste management and nuclear materials safeguards, all of which are essential parts of the IAEA programme. In the 1980s, the number of measured fission yields increased so drastically that the manpower available for evaluating them to meet specific user needs was insufficient. To cope with this task, it was concluded in several meetings on fission product nuclear data, some of them convened by the IAEA, that international co-operation was required, and an IAEA co-ordinated research project (CRP) was recommended. This recommendation was endorsed by the International Nuclear Data Committee, an advisory body for the nuclear data programme of the IAEA. As a consequence, the CRP on the Compilation and Evaluation of Fission Yield Nuclear Data was initiated in 1991, after its scope, objectives and tasks had been defined by a preparatory meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • VII. Nuclear Fission and Fusion Lorant Csige
    VII.VII. NuclearNuclear FissionFission andand FusionFusion LorantLorant CsigeCsige LaboratoryLaboratory forfor NuclearNuclear PhysicsPhysics HungarianHungarian AcademyAcademy ofof SciencesSciences NuclearNuclear bindingbinding energy:energy: possibilitypossibility ofof energyenergy productionproduction NuclearNuclear FusionFusion ● Some basic principles: ─ two light nuclei should be very close to defeat the Coulomb repulsion → nuclear attraction: kinetic energy!! ─ not spontenious, difficult to achieve in reality ─ advantage: large amount of hydrogen and helium + solutions without producing any readioactive product NuclearNuclear fusionfusion inin starsstars ● proton-proton cycle: ~ mass of Sun, many branches ─ 2 + ν first step in all branches (Q=1.442 MeV): p+p → H+e +νe ● diproton formation (and immediate decay back to two protons) is the ruling process ● stable diproton is not existing → proton – proton fusion with instant beta decay! ● very slow process since weak interaction plays role → cross section has not yet been measrued experimentally (one proton „waits” 9 billion years to fuse) ─ second step: 2H+1H → 3He + γ + 5.49 MeV ● very fast process: only 4 seconds on the avarage ● 3He than fuse to produce 4He with three (four) differenct reactions (branches) ─ ppI branch: 3He + 3He → 4He + 1H + 1H + 12.86 MeV ─ ppII branch: ● 3He + 4He → 7Be + γ 7 7 ● 7 7 ν Be + e- → Li + νe ● 7Li + 1H → 4He + 4He ─ ppIII branch: only 0.11% energy of Sun, but source of neutrino problem ● 3He + 4He → 7Be + γ 7 1 8 8 + 4 4 ● 7 1 8 γ 8 + ν 4 4 Be + H →
    [Show full text]
  • Inis: Terminology Charts
    IAEA-INIS-13A(Rev.0) XA0400071 INIS: TERMINOLOGY CHARTS agree INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, AUGUST 1970 INISs TERMINOLOGY CHARTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ... ......... *.* 1 PREFACE 2 INTRODUCTION ... .... *a ... oo 3 LIST OF SUBJECT FIELDS REPRESENTED BY THE CHARTS ........ 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTOR INDEX ................ 9*999.9o.ooo .... 7 FOREWORD This document is one in a series of publications known as the INIS Reference Series. It is to be used in conjunction with the indexing manual 1) and the thesaurus 2) for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centrea. The thesaurus and terminology charts in their first edition (Rev.0) were produced as the result of an agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). Except for minor changesq the terminology and the interrela- tionships btween rms are those of the December 1969 edition of the Euratom Thesaurus 3) In all matters of subject indexing and ontrol, the IAEA followed the recommendations of Euratom for these charts. Credit and responsibility for the present version of these charts must go to Euratom. Suggestions for improvement from all interested parties. particularly those that are contributing to or utilizing the INIS magnetic-tape services are welcomed. These should be addressed to: The Thesaurus Speoialist/INIS Section Division of Scientific and Tohnioal Information International Atomic Energy Agency P.O. Box 590 A-1011 Vienna, Austria International Atomic Energy Agency Division of Sientific and Technical Information INIS Section June 1970 1) IAEA-INIS-12 (INIS: Manual for Indexing) 2) IAEA-INIS-13 (INIS: Thesaurus) 3) EURATOM Thesaurusq, Euratom Nuclear Documentation System.
    [Show full text]
  • Properties of Selected Radioisotopes
    CASE FILE COPY NASA SP-7031 Properties of Selected Radioisotopes A Bibliography PART I: UNCLASSIFIED LITERATURE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA SP-7031 PROPERTIES OF SELECTED RADIOISOTOPES A Bibliography Part I: Unclassified Literature A selection of annotated references to technical papers, journal articles, and books This bibliography was compiled and edited by DALE HARRIS and JOSEPH EPSTEIN Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Scientific and Technical Information Division / OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION 1968 USP. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D.C. PREFACE The increasing interest in the application of substantial quantities of radioisotopes for propulsion, energy conversion, and various other thermal concepts emphasizes a need for the most recent and most accurate information available describing the nuclear, chemical, and physical properties of these isotopes. A substantial amount of progress has been achieved in recent years in refining old and developing new techniques of measurement of the properties quoted, and isotope processing. This has resulted in a broad technological base from which both the material and information about the material is available. Un- fortunately, it has also resulted in a multiplicity of sources so that information and data are either untimely or present properties without adequately identifying the measurement techniques or describing the quality of material used. The purpose of this document is to make available, in a single reference, an annotated bibliography and sets of properties for nine of the more attractive isotopes available for use in power production. Part I contains all the unclassified information that was available in the literature surveyed. Part II is the classified counterpart to Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Fission
    13) Nuclear fission (1) Remind! Nuclear binding energy Nuclear binding energy per nucleon V - Sum of the masses of nucleons is bigger than the e M / nucleus of an atom n o e l - Difference: nuclear binding energy c u n r e p - Energy can be gained by fusion of light elements y g r e or fission of heavy elements n e g n i d n i B Mass number 157 13) Nuclear fission (2) Spontaneous fission - heavy nuclei are instable for spontaneous fission - according to calculations this should be valid for all nuclei with A > 46 (Pd !!!!) - practically, a high energy barrier prevents the lighter elements from fission - spontaneous fission is observed for elements heavier than actinium - partial half-lifes for 238U: 4,47 x 109 a (α-decay) 9 x 1015 a (spontaneous fission) - Sponatenous fission of uranium is practically the only natural source for technetium - contribution increases with very heavy elements (99% with 254Cf) 158 1 13) Nuclear fission (3) Potential energy of a nucleus as function of the deformation (A, B = energy barriers which represent fission barriers Saddle point - transition state of a nucleus is determined by its deformation - almost no deformation in the ground state - fission barrier is higher by 6 MeV Ground state Point of - tunneling of the barrier at spontaneous fission fission y g r e n e l a i t n e t o P 159 13) Nuclear fission (4) Artificially initiated fission - initiated by the bombardment with slow (thermal neutrons) - as chain reaction discovered in 1938 by Hahn, Meitner and Strassmann - intermediate is a strongly deformed
    [Show full text]
  • Etude Des Évolutions Microstructurales Sous Irradiation De L’Alliage D’Aluminium 6061-T6
    THÈSE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES Spécialité : Matériaux, Mécanique, Génie Civil, Electrochimie (2MGE) Arrêté ministériel : 7 août 2006 Présentée par Camille FLAMENT Thèse dirigée par Alexis DESCHAMPS et codirigée par Jérôme GARNIER et Joël RIBIS préparée au sein du Laboratoire d’étude du Comportement Mécanique des Matériaux (CEA) dans l'École Doctorale Ingénierie, Matériaux, Mécanique, Energétique, Environnement, Procédés, Production (I-MEP2) Etude des évolutions microstructurales sous irradiation de l’alliage d’aluminium 6061-T6 Thèse soutenue publiquement le 01 décembre 2015, devant le jury composé de : M. Alexis DESCHAMPS Professeur à l’INP de Grenoble, Directeur Mme. Myriam DUMONT Maître de conférences à l’Université Aix-Marseille, Rapporteur M. Thierry EPICIER Directeur de recherche au CNRS, Président M. Jérôme GARNIER Ingénieur de recherche au CEA, Co-encadrant M. Alexandre LEGRIS Professeur à l’Université Lille 1, Rapporteur M. Joël RIBIS Ingénieur de recherche au CEA, Co-encadrant REMERCIEMENTS Remerciements Cette thèse a été réalisée au Service de Recherches Métallurgiques Appliquées (SRMA) du Département des Matériaux pour le Nucléaire du CEA Saclay (DMN). Je souhaite donc tout d’abord remercier Messieurs Philippe Chapelot et Pascal Yvon de m’avoir accueillie respectivement au SRMA et DMN. Je remercie également Madame Laetitia Nicolas, ex-chef du Laboratoire d’étude du Comportement Mécanique des Matériaux qui fut mon laboratoire de rattachement et Monsieur Jean- Luc Béchade, ex-chef du Laboratoire d’Analyse Microstructurale des Matériaux (dorénavant chef du Service de Recherche de Métallurgie Physique) au sein duquel j’ai pu m’installer et utiliser les différents outils de caractérisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Part 2: Low-Energy Nuclear Physics
    BNL-113453-2017-JA White paper on nuclear astrophysics and low-energy nuclear physics Part 2: Low-energy nuclear physics Mark A. Riley, Charlotte Elster, Joe Carlson, Michael P. Carpenter, Richard Casten, Paul Fallon, Alexandra Gade, Carl Gross, Gaute Hagen, Anna C. Hayes, Douglas W. Higinbotham, Calvin R. Howell, Charles J. Horowitz, Kate L. Jones, Filip G. Kondev, Suzanne Lapi, Augusto Macchiavelli, Elizabeth A. McCutchen, Joe Natowitz, Witold Nazarewicz, Thomas Papenbrock, Sanjay Reddy, Martin J. Savage, Guy Savard, Bradley M. Sherrill, Lee G. Sobotka, Mark A. Stoyer, M. Betty Tsang, Kai Vetter, Ingo Wiedenhoever, Alan H. Wuosmaa, Sherry Yennello Submitted to Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics January 13, 2017 National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP) (SC-26) Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No.DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Fission Barrier of 254No Gregoire Henning
    Stability of Transfermium Elements at High Spin : Measuring the Fission Barrier of 254No Gregoire Henning To cite this version: Gregoire Henning. Stability of Transfermium Elements at High Spin : Measuring the Fission Bar- rier of 254No. Other [cond-mat.other]. Université Paris Sud - Paris XI, 2012. English. NNT : 2012PA112143. tel-00745915 HAL Id: tel-00745915 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00745915 Submitted on 26 Oct 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés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bstract Super heavy nuclei provide opportunities to study nuclear struc- ture near three simultaneous limits: in charge Z, spin I and excita- tion energy E∗.
    [Show full text]
  • American Chemical Society Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology 247Th ACS National Meeting, Dallas, TX, March 16-20, 2014
    American Chemical Society Division of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology 247th ACS National Meeting, Dallas, TX, March 16-20, 2014 J. Braley, Program Chair; P. Mantica, Program Chair SUNDAY MORNING Glenn T. Seaborg Award for Nuclear Chemistry: Symposium in Honor of Walter D. Loveland D. Morrissey, Organizer; D. Thomas, Organizer; D. Morrissey, Presiding Papers 1-5 SUNDAY AFTERNOON Radiation Hardened Materials for Accelerators, Reactors and Spacecraft R. Devanathan, Organizer; I. Szlufarska, Presiding; R. Devanathan, Presiding Papers 6- 11 Glenn T. Seaborg Award for Nuclear Chemistry: Symposium in Honor of Walter D. Loveland D. Thomas, Organizer; D. Morrissey, Organizer; J. Natowitz, Presiding Papers 12-16 MONDAY MORNING Glenn T. Seaborg Award for Nuclear Chemistry: Symposium in Honor of Walter D. Loveland D. Thomas, Organizer; D. Morrissey, Organizer; C. Folden, Presiding Papers 22-26 Radiation Hardened Materials for Accelerators, Reactors and Spacecraft R. Devanathan, Organizer; K. Nordlund, Presiding Papers 17-21 MONDAY AFTERNOON Symposium in Honor of Norman Edelstein: A Distinguished and Diverse Scientific Career in Actinide Chemistry A. Sattelberger, Organizer; D. Clark, Organizer; D. Shuh, Organizer; L. Soderholm, Organizer; D. Clark, Presiding Papers 32-40 Radiation Hardened Materials for Accelerators, Reactors and Spacecraft R. Devanathan, Organizer; J. Greer, Presiding Papers 27-31 TUESDAY MORNING Global Status of Nuclear Energy J. Terry, Organizer; K. Nash, Organizer; J. Terry, Presiding; K. Nash, Presiding Papers 41-48 Symposium in Honor of Norman Edelstein: A Distinguished and Diverse Scientific Career in Actinide Chemistry A. Sattelberger, Organizer; D. Clark, Organizer; D. Shuh, Organizer; L. Soderholm, Organizer; J. Gibson, Presiding Papers 49-59 TUESDAY AFTERNOON Global Status of Nuclear Energy K.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Calculation of Fission Barrier Parameters for 5254 Nuclei with 171 ≤ a ≤ 330
    Nuclear Physcs Large-Scale Calculation of Fission Barrier Parameters for 5254 Nuclei with 171 ≤ A ≤ 330 Peter Möller, Arnold J. Sierk, T-16 n previous Theoretical Division Nuclear the calculated potential-energy surfaces. At Weapons Highlights issues, we have this stage we have extracted the heights of discussed calculations of fission the first and second barrier peaks and the potential-energy surfaces as functions fission-isomeric state for all 5254 nuclei. Iof up to five different nuclear shape coordinates as the system evolves from a Figure 1 shows a comparison between ground-state shape to two separated fission calculated and experimental barrier fragments. The five shape coordinates we parameters for a sequence of uranium consider beyond the second minimum in the nuclei. The experimental data are from a fission barrier (fission isomer) are elongation, review by Madland [1]. Sometimes the neck radius, spheroidal deformations of the results of several experiments are plotted for emerging left and right fragments, and left- the same isotope. We have made such right mass asymmetry. For less deformed comparisons for isotope chains of all shapes between the spherical shape and the elements from Th to Es (Z = 90 to Z = 99). second minimum in the barrier we consider Such detailed knowledge about the barrier three shape coordinates in the Nilsson structure and other nuclear structure ε ε perturbed-spheroid parameterization: 2 properties are necessary to model (n,f), ε γ (quadrupole), 4 (hexadecapole), and (axial (n,2n), and many other cross
    [Show full text]
  • The Jules Horowitz Reactor Research Project
    EPJ Web of Conferences 115, 01003 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201611501003 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 nd 2 Int. Workshop Irradiation of Nuclear Materials: Flux and Dose Effects November 4-6, 2015, CEA – INSTN Cadarache, France The Jules Horowitz Reactor Research Project: A New High Performance Material Testing Reactor Working as an International User Facility – First Developments to Address R&D on Material Gilles BIGNAN1, Christian COLIN1, Jocelyn PIERRE1, Christophe BLANDIN1, Christian GONNIER1, Michel AUCLAIR2, Franck ROZENBLUM2 1 CEA-DEN-DER, JHR Project (Cadarache, France) 2 CEA-DEN-DRSN, Service d'Irradiations en Réacteurs et d'Etudes Nucléaires, SIREN (Saclay, France) The Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) is a new Material Testing Reactor (MTR) currently under construction at CEA Cadarache research center in the south of France. It will represent a major research infrastructure for scientific studies dealing with material and fuel behavior under irradiation (and is consequently identified for this purpose within various European road maps and forums; ESFRI, SNETP…). The reactor will also contribute to medical Isotope production. The reactor will perform R&D programs for the optimization of the present generation of Nuclear Power Plans (NPPs), will support the development of the next generation of NPPs (mainly LWRs) and also will offer irradiation capabilities for future reactor materials and fuels. JHR is fully optimized for testing material and fuel under irradiation, in normal, incidental and accidental situations: with modern irradiation loops producing the operational condition of the different power reactor technologies ; with major innovative embarked in-pile instrumentation and out-pile analysis to perform high- quality R&D experiments ; with high thermal and fast neutron flux capacity and high dpa rate to address existing and future NPP needs.
    [Show full text]