Federally and Provincially Protected Lepidoptera Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Federally and provincially protected ALG NEWS—Vol. 4: Issue 1 Lepidoptera species Fall 2008 COSEWIC, SARA, AESCC, and AWA by Gregory Pohl, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service Traditionally, Lepi- mittees charged with doing can designate protected doptera and other inver- species assessments, I'll status under SARA. The tebrates have not received attempt to demystify the CESCC is comprised of: very much attention from process here. - Four members from fe- environmentalists and deral government depart- conservationists. Most of Federal Protection. ments (the Canadian Wild- the energy has been di- Federally, species are life Service, Department of rected towards mammals protected by the Species at Fisheries and Oceans, Parks and birds, the "charismatic Risk Act (SARA). Pro- Canada, and the Canadian megafauna", rather than tection under SARA makes Museum of Nature on the less conspicuous or- it illegal to kill or harm a behalf of the Federal ganisms that dominate the species on federal lands. As Biodiversity Information planet. More recently, but- well, the federal and re- Partnership). terflies, the "charismatic levant provincial govern- - Thirteen members from megafauna" of the insect ments are obligated to de- provincial and territorial world, have begun to re- velop and implement reco- governments ceive attention. A few of very plans for protected - Three members from na- the better-known moth species. Species are asses- tional non-government sci- species, particularly those sed for conservation status entific, conservation or en- dependent on rare host by the Committee on the vironmental organizations plants, or associated with Status of Endangered Wild- - Nine scientific specialists seriously threatened habi- life in Canada (COSEWIC). on particular taxonomic tats such as sand dunes, COSEWIC reports to the groups (chairs of Species have crept up on the radar Canadian Endangered Spe- Specialist Subcommittees as well. But how exactly cies Conservation Council (SSCs) see below) does an insect species at- (CESCC), which is made up - One chair from the tain a status of "endan- of fe-deral, provincial, and Aboriginal Traditional gered" or "threatened", and terri-torial ministers respon- Knowledge (ATK) Specia- what does that mean any- sible for the management of list Group. way? As a member on species at risk. That body in (Continued on page 2) both the provincial and turn makes recommenda- federal scientific subcom- tions to parliament, which “Bewitched” By Gary Anweiler In the late summer of 1991 “sugaring” for moths demeanor, surreptitiously I was at the peak of my cooking away in my psyche painting bait on local golf- GUILD “Catocala madness”, lured had finally erupted into full course and city park trees. down to southern Alberta bloom and I was out there A sticky business and, as by the possibility of in the dusk whenever I had one soon discovers this far finding those exotics (for time and weather permitted; north, a late night adventure someone from CENTRAL can of sugar bait, knapsack as for much of the season it Alberta) like C. meskei, full of rattling glass jars and is approaching 11 PM hermia, parta, et al. extra flash-light batteries, before darkness finally Years of having Holland’s paint brush and most arrives. magical essay on importantly a casual (Continued on page 2) Contents of this Issue: Special points of interest: • Protected Lepidoptera species • Protecting Lepidoptera • A Witch Sabbath • “Bewitched” • Wolley Dod Award 2007 • 2007 Wolley Dod Award THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF ALBERTA LEPIDOPTERISTS’ ALG NEWS species' risk of extinction or extirpation. (Protected Lepidoptera species - continued from page 1) The assessment is a rigorous process based on the population size, geographic Candidates for COSEWIC are range, and perceived threats to the recommended by CESCC and are species. The result is a status So far, COSEWIC has assessed appointed under federal legislation for a recommendation; the species is deemed four year renewable term. not at risk, threatened, endangered, 28 butterfly and moths species Each of the nine SSCs focuses on a extirpated, or extinct. Additionally, a particular taxonomic group. They are species can been deemed to be of special for conservation status made up of scientific experts and at least concern, if it does not quite meet the one expert from the ATK Subcommittee. requirements of threatened or SSC members are selected by the relevant endangered, but the subcommittee has a SSC, and are appointed to four-year good reason to recommend that it be renewable terms. COSEWIC members, protected nevertheless. As well, a species conservation status; 10 of these occur in including SSC members, do not represent can be deemed data deficient, meaning Alberta (Table 1). Detailed status reports the agency, group or region from which that not enough is known about the and regular summary reports of species at they are drawn. They are appointed on the species, to make an accurate designation. risk are available on the COSEWIC basis of their expertise, and are expected Assessments of threatened, endangered, website. A list of species protected under to conduct assessments with strict or of special concern are recommended SARA is available on the SARA registry impartiality and independent of non- for protected status under SARA. At that website. scientific considerations. point, the recommendations are reviewed Lepidoptera are handled by the by the CESCC, and then sent to (Continued on page 3) Arthropod Specialist Subcommittee. parliament for debate before (hopefully) Besides Lepidoptera, this group is being passed actively assessing odonates, tiger beetles, into law. bees, and selected other arthropod taxa. Species are The subcommittee maintains a prioritized reassessed candidate list, and puts names forward for every ten consideration by the parent committee years to see (COSEWIC) to consider for evaluation. if a status From the species put forward by the change is various SSCs, COSEWIC selects a small warranted. number of species each year and So far, commissions status reports on them. COSEWIC COSEWIC may also accept unsolicited has assessed reports from the public. These reports are 28 butterfly then approved by the subcommittee and and moths used to suggest assessments of the species for Detailed status reports and regular summary reports of species at risk are available on the COSEWIC Weidemeyer's Admiral (Limenitis weidemeyerii), currently the only provincially protected Lepidoptera in Alberta. This specimen is from website. Idaho where it is neither endangered nor protected (photo T. J. Simonsen). (”Bewitched”— continued from page 1) So there was I, August 27, in a 25 lb. pike one always knew could be was, back on the bait, and then in my jar. little plantation along a prairie stream in down there when one was fishing (“guy No doubt about it....it was real! the grasslands west of Claresholm, AB caught one in this very lake just last So, what does one do with a Black (near Willow Creek Provincial Park), in year !!”). Kid stuff. Two trees later, so Witch??? What bit of science could be the blackness, checking baits. It can get a help me Buddha, there it was - a great big served by another specimen of a moth that bit spooky out there when one is alone, Black Witch sucking bait!! Too big for is unmistakable?? I thought about the especially if there is a bit of wind as there any of the jars I had with me!!! And then amazingly long flight it had made up from was this night. As I tired my mind she was ……………..gone!!! the tropics in the darkness, night after wandered off like a child. There were a Back to the van for the BIG jar I night, to a cottonwood along a creek in number of “cats” at the baits, a few other had there, still not 100% certain I had not southern Albert, Canada, perfectly timed noctuids, but nothing very EXCITING. A been hallucinating (always a possibility to coincide with the one in my head! voice in my head was babbling away and I for those of us who survived the 60’s!). heard it say “wouldn’t it be neat to find But when I returned to the tree there it a...a a.. Black Witch at my bait! Like that (continued on page 4) ALG NEWS—VOL. 4: ISSUE 1 Page 2 (Protected Lepidoptera species - continued from page 1) itically charged process. Recommendations are then made to the provincial Minister of Sustainable Resource Development to desig- nate protected status under the Alberta Wild- life Act. The AESCC is not proactive about maintaining a candidate list and assessing species; they simply carry out provincial assessments of species that have already been designated federally. So far, only one Lepido- ptera species (Limenitis weidemeyerii Edwards) is provincially protec- ted, but a second spe- cies (Tegeticula yuc- cassella (Riley) is in the Table 1. Alberta Lepidoptera species assessed for conservation status by COSEWIC, process of being assessed. and resulting SARA protection. Provincial Protection. disciplines, and deals with plants and Protected status for threatened and animals. Like its federal counterpart on With such a diverse group of endangered species is designated COSEWIC, the subcommittee com- provincially under the Alberta Wildlife missions status reports and makes status stakeholders at the table, the Act. Provincially, the process is very recommendations to the parent committee, similar the to federal one. Species are the AESCC. The AESCC is made up of AESCC's review of protected assessed by the Scientific Subcommittee members from industry, governments, and of the Alberta Endangered Species non-governmental organisations. With status recommendations can be Conservation Committee (AESCC). The such a diverse group of stakeholders at the scientific subcommittee is made up of table, the AESCC's review of protected a politically-charged process. experts from across all biological status recommendations can be a po- Besides federal and provincial designations, species are given global conservation rankings.
Recommended publications
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations

    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations

    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
  • Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Molecular systematics of the subfamily Limenitidinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Bidur Dhungel1 and Niklas Wahlberg2 1 Southwestern Centre for Research and PhD Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal 2 Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ABSTRACT We studied the systematics of the subfamily Limenitidinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphal- idae) using molecular methods to reconstruct a robust phylogenetic hypothesis. The molecular data matrix comprised 205 Limenitidinae species, four outgroups, and 11,327 aligned nucleotide sites using up to 18 genes per species of which seven genes (CycY, Exp1, Nex9, PolII, ProSup, PSb and UDPG6DH) have not previously been used in phylogenetic studies. We recovered the monophyly of the subfamily Limenitidinae and seven higher clades corresponding to four traditional tribes Parthenini, Adoliadini, Neptini, Limenitidini as well as three additional independent lineages. One contains the genera Harma C Cymothoe and likely a third, Bhagadatta, and the other two indepen- dent lineages lead to Pseudoneptis and to Pseudacraea. These independent lineages are circumscribed as new tribes. Parthenini was recovered as sister to rest of Limenitidinae, but the relationships of the remaining six lineages were ambiguous. A number of genera were found to be non-monophyletic, with Pantoporia, Euthalia, Athyma, and Parasarpa being polyphyletic, whereas Limenitis, Neptis, Bebearia, Euryphura, and Adelpha were paraphyletic. Subjects Biodiversity, Entomology, Taxonomy Keywords Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Systematics, New tribe, Classification, Limenitidinae Submitted 22 November 2017 Accepted 11 January 2018 Published 2 February 2018 INTRODUCTION Corresponding author Niklas Wahlberg, The butterfly family Nymphalidae has been the subject of intensive research in many fields [email protected] of biology over the decades.
  • Territorial Behavior of the Red Admiral Butterfly, Vanessa Atalanta (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Royce Justin Bitzer Iowa State University

    Territorial Behavior of the Red Admiral Butterfly, Vanessa Atalanta (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Royce Justin Bitzer Iowa State University

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1995 Territorial behavior of the Red Admiral Butterfly, Vanessa atalanta (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Royce Justin Bitzer Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Entomology Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Bitzer, Royce Justin, "Territorial behavior of the Red Admiral Butterfly, Vanessa atalanta (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) " (1995). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 10881. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/10881 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the miaofilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of conq)uter printer. The quality of this reproductioii is dependrat upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard Tnarginc and inqiroper alignment can adversety affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note win indicate the deletion.
  • Watching Western Colorado Butterflies

    Watching Western Colorado Butterflies

    Watching Western Colorado Butterflies Dr. Warren H. “Herb” Wagner Why? • Enhance the outdoor experience • Intro to butterfly conservation • Fun Three Steps to Conservation Xerxes Society for Invertebrate Conservation 1) Identify the resources The butterflies Their larval host plants The adult food sources floral & other 2) Protect the resources The landscape & nectar, host plants 3) Enhance the resources Larval & adult host plants Gardens What are the threats? Invasive weeds Knapweeds, bindweed, cheatgrasses, spurges, … Large scale hot-burning fire More frequent, smaller fires not a threat People Serious collecting benefits long term conservation efforts A few rare species are threatened by over-collecting Habitat destruction is a real and serious threat to many butterfly populations Collecting Butterflies With proper labeling & care COLO Mesa Co • Indisputable historical records Black Ridge Rd • Essential for proper ID 6 Apr 1996 • Genetic records JA & RW Hammon • Fun! • Pretty Paonia Colo 7/23/1932 If you are going to use a field guide, this is the one Colorado Butterflies 289 Species West slope - > 200 species Gunnison County 159 species Mesa County 155 species • Skippers 36 species • Skippers 36 species • Swallowtails 6 species • Swallowtails 7 species • Lycaenids 40 species • Lycaenids 39 species • Pierids 20 species • Pierids 16 species • Metalmarks 1 species • Metalmarks 1 species • Nymphalids 56 species • Nymphalids 56 species Metamorphosis naturallycuriouswithmaryholland Lepidoptera = Scale wing The proboscis, clubbed antenna
  • Hybridization of Limenitis in the Western Great Basin (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Hybridization of Limenitis in the Western Great Basin (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    . Vo. 6 No. 2 1999 BOYD et al: Western Great Basin Limenitis Hybrids 37 HOLARCTIC LEPIDOPTERA, 6(2): 37-74 HYBRIDIZATION OF LIMENITIS IN THE WESTERN GREAT BASIN (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE) BRET M. BOYD1, BRUCE M. BOYDM, GEORGE T. AUSTIN2, AND DENNIS D. MURPHY3 '207 Valley Forge Avenue, Henderson, Nevada 89015; 2Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107; 3Dept. of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557; ••Research Associate, Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107, USA ABSTRACT.- The distribution and nature of sympatry and interaction of Limenitis weidemeyerii, Limenitis lorquini, and their "fridayi" hybrid were investigated in the ( southwestern Great Basin during 1996-1998. L. weidemeyerii is univoltine, L. lorquini is at least bivoltine, and "fridayi" showed a peak flight corresponding to the peak flight of L. weidemeyerii and the first brood of L. lorquini. This "Mono" hybrid zone extends from the Wassuk Range in western Nevada to several canyons on the east slope of the Sierra Nevada (Devils Gate Summit to Lee Vining Creek) in eastern California where these Limenitis inhabit streamside willow associations. L. weidemeyerii occurs as pure populations to the east and L. lorquini occurs to the north, west, and south of the hybrid zone. The hybrid zone has a general east to west gradient of decreasing proportions of L. weidemeyerii and increasing proportions of L. lorquini', hybrids are most common at intermediate locations. The trend varies somewhat, in part due to the convoluted axis of the hybrid zone with several subaxes and the geographical proximity of populations of one or the other parentals.
  • Sentinels on the Wing: the Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada

    Sentinels on the Wing: the Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada

    Sentinels on the Wing The Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada Peter W. Hall Foreword In Canada, our ties to the land are strong and deep. Whether we have viewed the coasts of British Columbia or Cape Breton, experienced the beauty of the Arctic tundra, paddled on rivers through our sweeping boreal forests, heard the wind in the prairies, watched caribou swim the rivers of northern Labrador, or searched for song birds in the hardwood forests of south eastern Canada, we all call Canada our home and native land. Perhaps because Canada’s landscapes are extensive and cover a broad range of diverse natural systems, it is easy for us to assume the health of our important natural spaces and the species they contain. Our country seems so vast compared to the number of Canadians that it is difficult for us to imagine humans could have any lasting effect on nature. Yet emerging science demonstrates that our natural systems and the species they contain are increas- ingly at risk. While the story is by no means complete, key indicator species demonstrate that Canada’s natural legacy is under pressure from a number of sources, such as the conversion of lands for human uses, the release of toxic chemicals, the introduction of new, invasive species or the further spread of natural pests, and a rapidly changing climate. These changes are hitting home and, with the globalization and expansion of human activities, it is clear the pace of change is accelerating. While their flights of fancy may seem insignificant, butterflies are sentinels or early indicators of this change, and can act as important messengers to raise awareness.
  • Of the Geographic Range of B. Philenor, Limenitis Arthemis Arthemis Has Medial White Wing Bands

    Of the Geographic Range of B. Philenor, Limenitis Arthemis Arthemis Has Medial White Wing Bands

    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 47(1), 1993, 22-31 TERRITORIALITY ALONG FL YW A YS AS MATE-LOCATING BEHAVIOR IN MALE LIMENITIS ARTHEMIS (NYMPHALID AE) ROBERT C. LEDERHOUSE Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 ABSTRACT. A central New York population of Limenitis arthemis (Drury) was studied during June and July 1983. Males emerged a week before females with an overall male-biased sex ratio of 1.43:1.00. Of the 30 marked males, 7 (23%) were recaptured within the study area with an average longevity of 10.3 days. No marked female was recaptured. During midday mate-locating behavior, males perched an average of 82.5%, flew for 14.0%, and encountered other individuals for 3.5% of the time. Conspecific males were encountered at a rate of 8.3/h. Conspecific encounters averaged Significantly longer than heterospecific encounters (12.8 vs. 5.8 sec). Marked males favored certain areas for perching but changed areas fairly frequently resulting in dynamic territories. Nearly half the perches were on sumac, and 68% were 1-3 m above the ground. Favored territories provided good vantage of female flyways. Additional key words: activity budget, mark-recapture, protandry. Territoriality in butterflies is a male tactic to locate receptive females (Powell 1968, Baker 1972, Davies 1978, Lederhouse 1982a, Wickman 1985a,b). Commonly, males defend landscape features such as hilltops and ridges that have high female visitation rates despite their lack of concentrated larval or adult resources (Shields 1968, Lederhouse 1982a, Alcock 1983, 1985, Alcock & O'Neill 1986, Alcock & Gwynne 1988, Rutowski et al.
  • Inventories of Butterflies 2009

    Inventories of Butterflies 2009

    2009 Report Inventories of Butterflies in Boulder County By Janet Chu November 7, 2009 Table of Contents I. Acknowledgments …………………… 3 II. Abstract …………………………… 4 II. Introduction……………………………… 4 IV. Objectives ………………………….. 5 V. Research Methods ………………….. 6 VI. Results and Discussion ………………... 6 A. Boulder County Open Spaces ... 7 B. City of Boulder Properties …. 9 VII. Conclusions …………………………….. 13 VIII. Recommendations …………………….. 13 IX. References …………………………. 14 X. Butterfly Survey Data Tables …………. 15 Table I. Survey Dates and Locations ……………. 15 Sites belonging to Boulder County … 15 Table II. Southeast Buffer …………………. 16 Table III. Anne U. White Trail ………………. 18 Table IV. Heil Valley Open Space –Geer Watershed... 21 Table V. Heil Valley Open Space –Plumely Canyon 24 Table VI. Heil Valley Open Space – North ………… 27 Table VII. Walker Ranch - Meyer‟s Gulch ………… 30 Table VIII. Caribou Ranch Open Space ………………33 Sites belonging to City of Boulder …… 36 Table IX. Left Hand Valley Reservoir …………… 36 Table X. Hoover Hill, Westview Road ……………. 37 Table XI. Marshall Mesa …………………….…… 38 2 I. Acknowledgments Our research team has conducted butterfly surveys for eight consecutive years, from 2002 through 2009, with 2002-2004 being introductory to the lands and species, and 2005-2009 more in depth. Larry Crowley, Jean Morgan, and Amy Chu have been valuable team members, joined at times by the author‟s grandsons Asa and Jeremy Hurst and associates Mike Sportiello and Cathy Cook. Ruth Carol Cushman and Joyce Gellhorn added expertise on plant life. The majority of the surveys have been in Boulder County Parks and Open Space (BCPOS) lands. Therese Glowacki issued a Special Collection Permit for access into the Open Spaces; Mark Brennan oversaw research, maintained records of our monographs and organized seminars for presentation of data.
  • Butterfly Checklist

    Butterfly Checklist

    PAPILIONIDAE: Parnassians and Swallowtails LYCAENIDAE (Continued) NYMPHALIDAE: (Continued) ____ 1 Rocky Mountain Parnassian - Parnassius smintheus sayii ____ 49 Striped Hairstreak - Satyrium liparops aliparops ____ 94 Field Crescent - Phyciodes pratensis camillus ____ 2 Pipevine Swallowtail - Battus philenor ____ 50a Olive Hairstreak - Callophrys gryneus gryneus ____ 95 Pale Crescent - Phyciodes pallida barnesi ____ 3 Zebra Swallowtail - Eurytides marcellus ____ 50b Juniper Hairstreak - Callophrys gryneus siva ____ 96 Variable Checkerspot - Euphydryas chalcedona bernadetta ____ 4 Black Swallowtail - Papilio polyxenes asterius ____ 51 Brown Elfin - Callophrys augustinus ____ 97 Question Mark - Polygonia interrogationis ____ 5 Old World Swallowtail - Papilio machaon bairdii ____ 52 Hoary Elfin - Callophrys polia obscura ____ 98 Eastern Comma - Polygonia comma ____ 6 Anise Swallowtail - Papilio zelicaon nitra ____ 53 Western Pine Elfin - Callophrys eryphon ____ 99 Satyr Comma - Polygonia satyrus ____ 7 Indra Swallowtail - Papilio indra ____ 54 Gray Hairstreak - Strymon melinus franki ____ 100 Green Comma - Polygonia faunus hylas ____ 8 Giant Swallowtail - Papilio cresphontes ____ 55 Marine Blue - Leptotes marina ____ 101 Hoary Comma - Polygonia gracilis zephyrus ____ 9 Eastern Tiger Swallowtail - Papilio glaucus ____ 56 Reakirt’s Blue - Hemiargus isola ____ 102 Gray Comma - Polygonia progne ____ 10 Canadian Tiger Swallowtail - Papilio canadensis ____ 57 Eastern Tailed-Blue - Everes comyntas ____ 103 Compton Tortoiseshell - Nymphalis vaualbum
  • Weidemeyer's Admiral (Limenitis Weidemeyerii) in Alberta Was Completed (ASRD and ACA 2005)

    Weidemeyer's Admiral (Limenitis Weidemeyerii) in Alberta Was Completed (ASRD and ACA 2005)

    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Weidemeyer’s Admiral (Limenitis weidemeyerii) in Canada Weidemeyer’s Admiral 2017 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. Management Plan for the Weidemeyer’s Admiral (Limenitis weidemeyerii) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. iii + 34 pp. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: Weidemeyer’s Admiral resting on Western Snowberry © Environment and Climate Change Canada Photographer: Lynne Burns. Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion de l’amiral de Weidemeyer (Limenitis weidemeyerii) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2017. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 Management Plan for the Weidemeyer’s Admiral 2017 Preface The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed species of special concern and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry.
  • Revision of the Limenitis Weidemeyerii Complex, With

    Revision of the Limenitis Weidemeyerii Complex, With

    JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' ~30CIETY Volume 21 1967 Number 4 REVISION OF THE LINJENITIS \VEIDEMEYEHll COMPLEX, WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NE\V SUBSPECIES (NYMPHALIDAE ). STEPHEN F. PEHKINS AND EDWIN ~1:. PEHKINS, In. Oregon Regional Primate Research Center, BeavertoIl, Oregon INTHODUCfION There is no single ,;york ,;yhich presents a comprehensive analysis of a given species group of the genus Limenitis Fabricius, 1807, in North America. Our present knowledge is largely dependent on R. L. Cher­ mock's generic revision (1950). It seems peculiar that the scattered descriptions of specific and subspecific members of the North American lorquini complex of Limenitis were not presented as a unit until very recently (Perkins and Perkins, 1966). This second paper deals with the Limenitis weidemeyerii Edwards (1861) complex; historical back­ ground data, original descriptions, geographic ranges, and overt dis­ crepancies are included. Although the weidemeyerii complex inhabits nearly one-fifth the total area of the United States (Map 1), there is no evidence that components of the complex occur in either Canada or Mexico. In the United States weidemeyerii is established in Arizona, California, Colo­ rado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New ~1exico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. In addition, stray individuals have been reported from Kansas (Field, 1938: 98) and Oregon (Fender, 1931: 185). The latter record, from the "foothills south of McMinnville," Yamhill County, probably was an import. LIMENITIS WEIDEMEYERII WEIDEMEYERII Ed\;yards (figs. 1-4) L-imenitis weicleme yerii Edwards, 1862, Proe. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil. [13]: 162, [U1861"J. Brown (1964: 222) inadvertently reversed the dates of publication for tveidemeyerii and C ercyonis pegala wheeleri (Ed~'ards, 1873).
  • Chapter 13. Insects at Risk in the Prairie Region

    323 Chapter 13 Insects at Risk in the Prairie Region Peter W. Hall, Paul M. Catling, J. Donald Lafontaine Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Environmental Health, Biodiversity, Neatby and Saunders Bldgs., C.E.F., Ottawa, Canada K1A 0C6 Abstract. This chapter describes and analyses insects at risk in the Great Plains grasslands in the prairie provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba) and the Peace River region in British Columbia. Over the last century and a half, most of the native grasslands in this region have been replaced by intensive agricultural production or impacted by livestock, both activities hugely affecting insect populations. In addition to the relicts of grassland, “non-grassland” habitats exist within the region, including dunes, badlands, and riparian areas. These isolated habitats and their specific species, including insects, are an important part of the regional biodiversity. At the national, regional, and provincial levels of government, and among other conservation organizations, a large number of programs and legislation are aimed at protecting species at risk, including insects. These efforts are reviewed in this chapter. Résumé. Le présent chapitre décrit et analyse les espèces d’insectes en péril dans les grandes plaines des provinces des Prairies (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba) et dans la région de la rivière de la Paix, en Colombie-Britannique. Au cours des 150 dernières années, la plupart des prairies naturelles de cette région ont été remplacées par des zones d’agriculture intensive ou altérées par l’élevage du bétail, et ces changements ont eu un effet considérable sur les populations d’insectes. Outre les vestiges de la prairie naturelle, il existe dans la région d’autres types d’habitats comme les dunes, les bad-lands et les zones riveraines.