Exploratorium Ciencia Pública: Summative Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploratorium Ciencia Pública: Summative Report Ciencia Pública Summative Report Exploratorium Fall 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Overview 5 Methods 7 Results 10 Socio-Political Context 11 Community Response to the Parklet 13 Awareness/Understanding of Featured Content 16 Watering Plants 17 Salt Water 18 Water Vapor 19 Rain 20 Bilingual Labels 21 Diversity within Latino Family Groups 23 Community Partnership 27 Conclusions and Insights 31 References 35 Appendices 37 Credits All photos: Garibay Group except p. 11 top: Catherine South; p. 11 bottom: Wilson, New York Times Garibay Group | Exploratorium | Ciencia Pública | Summative Evaluation | Fall 2015 2 Executive Summary Ciencia Pública is a National Science Foundation (NSF) -funded collaboration between the Exploratorium, the Boys and Girls Club of San Francisco (BGCSF), and Buena Vista Horace Mann School (BVHM). The Parklet houses exhibits focused on the themes of water and sustainable water use and is intended to engage Latino families in its location, the Mission District neighborhood (the Mission). Using a culturally responsive approach, Garibay Group conducted a summative evaluation to assess project outcomes. Overall, this study found that the Ciencia Community Response Awareness/Understanding Pública project met its goals. Below, we All participants in this study saw value in the There was strong evidence that families summarize key findings. Parklet, particularly due to its subject matter. engaged with both the exhibits and the STEM They believed the Parklet helped raise content. While the drought was a familiar topic Socio-Political Context awareness about the drought in California and to all participants, the experiences at the Any project which focuses on and is situated reminded the community of the importance of Parklet provided opportunities for participants within a specific community will be affected by conserving water. Respondents found the to explore ideas, reflect on the drought, and many contextual forces outside its control. In Parklet’s topic timely and critical. They consider the importance of conserving water. the case of Ciencia Pública, the San appreciated the educational aspect of the Francisco tech boom and accompanying Parklet, commenting that this focus set it apart We documented positive family interactions gentrification of the Mission—which has from other parklets in the Mission (which they and conversations at the Parklet. The four resulted in the displacement of primarily generally felt only benefited the businesses exhibits had their individual strengths and Latino residents—has led to significant that sponsored them). Thus, they saw the challenges, but overall provided opportunities tensions and a growing sense of urgency in Ciencia Pública Parklet as being for the entire to engage with different yet complimentary the Mission to guard against further community. Participants noted that it added aspects of the topic. The Watering Plants encroachment. value to the community because of its subject interactive, for example, provided matter and educational focus. Parents from opportunities to explore water-efficient This situation affected where the Ciencia BVHM also emphasized the educational value strategies for watering (and growing) plants. Pública Parklet could be located. There were for their children and appreciated its hands-on We observed significant intergenerational indications that the current Valencia Street experiential learning. engagement, including conversations about location may have limited the number of how the component worked and ways Latinos visiting because the street is less Participants reported high levels of participants might create their own systems at frequented by Latino residents. (Based on enjoyment. The majority (98%) of survey home to more efficiently conserve water. The data from this study, 16% of casual passerby respondents rated their enjoyment a “4” or “3” strength of the Salt Water component was in groups identified as Latino/Hispanic.) on a 1–4 scale where 1 is “very low” and 4 is helping visitors explore, in detail, how “very high.” Of those who lived or worked in desalination—an idea many had only heard of The BVHM location, however, provides the Mission, 90% rated their likelihood of previously—actually works. The Rain significant opportunities to engage families visiting the Parklet again a “4” or “3” on a 1–4 component, particularly the histogram through the school; families and school staff scale (where 1 was “very low” and 4 was “very depicting historic and current rainfall, responded very positively to the Parklet. high”). generated significant conversation and comparison of rainfall levels, the severity of Garibay Group | Exploratorium | Ciencia Pública | Summative Evaluation | Fall 2015 3 Executive Summary cont’d. the drought, and the need to conserve water. were socialized into at school, whereby the project. The BGCSF contributed its expertise The Water Vapor interactive, less successful goal was knowledge acquisition. In this more in youth programming and knowledge of in comparison to the others, was the most linear model, learning is one-directional and working with Latino youth. BVHM leveraged challenging component conceptually. facilitated by a more knowledgeable individual its very strong relationships with and (usually the parent). In comparison, families knowledge of local Latino families along with Bilingual Labels where parents had less formal schooling did hosting the Parklet on its site. The Bilingual labels were positively received and not focus as narrowly on the science content/ Exploratorium contributed its expertise in communicated that everyone in the process depicted. Instead, these groups designing both Informal Science community was welcome. Respondents noted introduced a broad range of ideas and Environments (ISE) STEM experiences and that given the makeup of the Mission’s experiences to make sense of the information exhibitions in outdoor spaces . residents, it was appropriate and important they encountered. that the Parklet include information accessible The primary collaboration challenges to both Spanish and English readers. Both Families including adults with less formal centered on differences in organizational observations and interviews confirmed that schooling—and who typically were also less culture and communication style. Differences the bilingual labels provided families access familiar with museum-going practices—had in organizational mission also, at times, to information and helped maintain a group’s more difficulty making sense of the exhibits. colored perspectives on priorities. Results linguistic practices and norms, two things These groups, for example, were not clear on also illuminated ways that collaborations critical both in designing culturally responsive what the interactives were, who they were for, between different organizations are, by experiences and in ensuring access to the or what to do with them. While they were nature, affected by power structures and exhibit content. intrigued and generally had good organizational positioning. Partners in experiences, these groups were much more initiatives can deepen their relationships and Although the bilingual labels afforded positive reluctant to engage with the interactives. learn from these important “tensions.” experiences, they did not work for Latino Additionally, groups where parents had less families with little formal education. The tone formal schooling did not see the Parklet itself A key outcome from the collaboration was that and vocabulary were too academic, scientific, as culturally relevant, although they regarded it developed Exploratorium’s staff capacity in and intimidating for some. In addition, the the Parklet as important and completely “issue authentically engaging community. The labels were inaccessible to respondents with relevant.” process outlined and facilitated by BVHM staff low (or no) literacy. ensured that the local Latino community was Community Partnership involved in vetting and approving the Parklet Diversity within the Latino Community Overall, the Ciencia Pública partnership installation near the school. Exploratorium We found important differences in the ways accomplished its goals of co-developing a staff reported that the entire collaboration— that families with parents who have more parklet (in this case, with BGCSF youth) and the community engagement component in formal education and those parents with less creating experiences that successfully particular—provided many lessons and formal education engaged with the Parklet. engaged a segment of Latino families in modeled one way to approach community Families with caregivers having more formal STEM content. engagement. While the process took education drew on the learning models they significant staff effort and time and affected The evaluation also found evidence that each timelines, it was critical to the end result. partner brought its expertise to bear on the . Garibay Group | Exploratorium | Ciencia Pública | Summative Evaluation | Fall 2015 4 Overview Ciencia Pública is a National Science Foundation (NSF) -funded initiative in which the Exploratorium, in collaboration with the Boys and Girls Club of San Francisco (BGCSF), developed a parklet to engage Latino families in STEM content. The Parklet is located in San Francisco’s Mission District (the Mission), a historically Latino neighborhood. Buena Vista Horace Mann School (BVHM) is an additional project partner and hosts the Parklet on its site. Garibay Group conducted a summative
Recommended publications
  • San Francisco, California
    updated: 10.18.2017 Compressed Area - 4.5 Miles 2.5 Miles B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R Fort Point Blue & Gold Blue & Gold San Francisco Bay Red & Fleet to Fleet to Vallejo, 1 Cable Car Route Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco, California USA White Fleet Angel Island Jack London Square 1 (toll south bound) San Francisco Bay Cruise Sausalito & & Oakland Street Car (F-Line) Maritime Tiburon & Bay Cruise Golden Gate National Recreation Area Alcatraz Ferry Service MasonCrissy St Field National PIER Historical Park 45 43 41 39 One Way Traffic 47 431/2 Pre Marina Green s Hyde St id l io Aquatic End of One Way Traffic l Pa rkwa Marina Blvd Pier d y e Park Blue & Gold v l Cervantes Blvd Direction of w Lin Jefferson St Ferry Pier 35 o B co MARINA Fort Mason The Highway Ramps Cruise Terminal D l The Walt n n Cannery Anchorage 2 l E 2 c m 33 Disney FISHERMANS Photo Vantage Points o B ba M c Family Palace Beach St Beach St r l c v n Museum Ghirardelli a & Scenic Views i WHARF d Baker d of Fine Arts L (Main Post) GGNRA Square e North Point St ro 31 BART Station Beach North Point St Headquarters t Shopping Area S Bay St Bay St Bay St Pier 27 a Alcatraz Departure Terminal Parks br James R. Herman m Cruise Terminal R Alha Moscone Francisco St Francisco St 3 Beaches Letterman i Lincoln Blvd c 3 h Rec Ctr THE Veterans Blvd Digital Arts a Chestnut St Points of Interest Center Aver Chestnut St TELEGRAPH EMBARCADERO ds “Crookedest HILL o Hospitals n d Lombard St Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Motion Pictures & Television Program Brochure
    School of Motion Pictures & Television academyart.edu SCHOOL OF MOTION PICTURES & TV Contents Program Overview ...................................................5 What We Teach ......................................................... 7 The School of MPT Difference .................................9 Faculty .....................................................................11 Degree Options ..................................................... 13 Our Facilities ......................................................... 15 Alumni Success ..................................................... 17 Partnerships ......................................................... 19 Career Paths ......................................................... 21 Additional Learning Experiences ......................... 23 Awards and Accolades ......................................... 25 Online Education .................................................. 27 Academy Life ........................................................ 29 San Francisco ....................................................... 31 Athletics ................................................................ 33 Apply Today .......................................................... 35 3 SCHOOL OF MOTION PICTURES & TV Program Overview Taught by professionals working in the industry, including Academy and Emmy Award winners, our students learn their craft through hands-on filmmaking experience. IMMERSE YOURSELF Direct. Produce. Shoot. Edit. Production Design. Write. Crew up and follow your passion
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Grants for the Arts Advisory Panel FY 21 Docket Meeting #1 Action
    Grants for the Arts Advisory Panel FY 21 Docket Meeting #1 Action Minutes Wednesday, May 13, 2020 Virtual via Zoom Advisory Panel Present: Jon Moscone (Chair), Lanita Henriquez (Vice Chair), Kimberly Brandon, Yoyo Chan, Hagen Choi, Erika Gee, Nicola Miner, Pati Navalta Poblete, Marcus Shelby, Debra Walker, Anne Wintroub Mr. Choi departed at noon; Ms. Wintroub was absent from 12:00-12:55 p.m. Staff Present: Jason Blackwell, Ecaterina Burton, Matthew Goudeau, Kara Owens, Khan Wong The meeting was called to order at 10:11 a.m. 1. Approval of Advisory Panel Policy Retreat and Subcommittee Minutes Motion to approve September 10, 2019 Policy Retreat Minutes—Ms. Wintroub so moved; Mr. Shelby seconded. All in favor. Motion to approve October 2, 2019 Subcommittee Minutes—Ms. Wintroub so moved; Ms. Walker seconded. All in favor. 2. Assistance List Docket AfroSolo Theatre Company American Conservatory Theater Brava! For Women in the Arts Cartoon Art Museum Circus Center Frameline Magic Theatre San Francisco Contemporary Music Players The Marsh Theatre Rhinoceros World Arts West Youth Speaks Motion to move Assistant List Docket to Consent Docket for FY21 and return as part of the Discussion Docket in FY22—Ms. Wintroub so moved; Mr. Shelby seconded. All in favor. 1 3. Late Docket American Indian Film Institute Creativity Explored GLBT Historical Society Other Minds Motion to accept Late Applicant Docket for FY21 funding considerations with a 10% penalty that will have further monetary consideration at Docket Meeting #3—Ms. Walker so moved; Ms. Henriquez seconded. Ms. Brandon and Ms. Henriquez opposed. Communication regarding late applications will be discussed in-depth at the annual policy retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Mason Extension SPUR Preso 101911
    Extending Success: Streetcars to Ft. Mason Rick Laubscher, Doug Wright, Rich Hillis SPUR, October 19, 2011 Historic Streetcars: Huge SF Success ! “Trolley Festival” started Trolley Festival, 1983 momentum 28 years ago ! Used Market St. surface track ! Chamber-City joint project ! Mayor Feinstein was champion ! Community support led to: ⊕" 5-summer run ⊕" Adoption of permanent F-line F-line, Pier 39, 2000 ! F-line open 1995; to Wharf 2000 ! Today: 23,000+ daily riders ⊕" Most popular vintage line in U.S. ⊕" Service increased to meet demand ⊕" Still more service needed Rail’s Role: Commerce, Commuters, Defense Ferry Bldg. 1927 ! Waterfront rail – 1900-c.1960s ⊕" State Belt freight RR served piers ⊕" Supplies, troops carried to Fort Mason & Presidio on Army track ⊕" 25 streetcar lines served waterfront ♦"World’s 2nd busiest transit hub ! Maritime & defense evolved ⊕" Waterfront’s face changed forever ⊕" Today: recreation, visitor oriented Troop Train at Crissy Field 1941 Fort Mason Streetcar History ! Muni’s H-line served Fort Mason 1914-1948 Fort Mason Streetcar Revival ! Historic waterfront streetcar line repeatedly proposed ⊕" 1970: San Francisco Tomorrow suggests waterfront route ⊕" 1979: First Muni Embarcadero streetcar proposal included in plan ⊕" 1980: GGNRA General Management Plan proposes historic streetcar shuttle from Aquatic Park to Crissy Field ⊕" 1985: I-280 Transfer Study evaluates Caltrain-Fort Mason route ⊕" 2000: F-line extension opens to Wharf ⊕" 2001: Fort Mason Center, Fisherman’s Wharf Merchants, Market Street Railway
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Pdf Version of This Essay (48Kb)
    EVALUATING OUTDOOR EXPLORATORIUM EXHIBITS Joyce Ma Although not all findings from these studies found direct application in the final It was also during this period that we began to envision the Outdoor Exploratorium Senior Researcher exhibits, we learned valuable lessons about supporting outdoor noticing. In as a set of exhibits at one or more distributed sites away from the museum itself. Toni Dancu particular, we identified some of the reasons why visitors spent time noticing outside, We know quite a bit about Exploratorium visitors, but considering remote locations Research Associate including wanting to be in an attractive area, participate in independent exploration, required us to reevaluate our audience assumptions. The team thus began asking and see things they hadn’t noticed before (or familiar things from new perspectives). fundamental questions about the people who might use our exhibits: Who are they? valuation of the Outdoor Exploratorium We also discovered some impediments to exploring and noticing outside, such as What are they doing there? When are they there? We were particularly inspired by began in 2001, years before the project’s limited time, worries about safety (outdoor environments not always being well- the work of William Whyte, who conducted observational studies in the 1970s of 1 final realization as a set of exhibits at Fort bounded or predictable), and self-consciousness about activities that might seem how people use New York City plazas , and we conducted our own set of informal Mason. The Exploratorium has a long history unusual (such as using a magnifying class to examine dirt). Our findings also helped observations to learn about the ‘social life’ of the candidate sites our exhibits might Eof evaluating visitor exhibit experiences to better us redefine project content areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Metreon San Francisco, California
    Metreon San Francisco, California Project Type: Commercial/Industrial Case No: C030001 Year: 2000 SUMMARY A 350,000-square-foot urban entertainment center on a 2.75-acre site in downtown San Francisco. Developed by Millenium Partners and WDG Ventures, the project is located within the 87-acre Yerba Buena Center. Within the first few months of its opening in June 1999, Metreon attracted some 2.5 million visitors. As many as 40,000 people have visited on peak-period weekends. The four-level project offers amusements, games, shopping, restaurants, a food court, and cinemas—including a 600-seat SONY•IMAX theater, the largest of its type on the West Coast—enlivening the evening activity of the Yerba Buena Gardens neighborhood. FEATURES Urban entertainment center Downtown development Ground lease Interactive entertainment Metreon San Francisco, California Project Type: Retail/Entertainment Volume 30 Number 01 January-March 2000 Case Number: C030001 PROJECT TYPE A 350,000-square-foot urban entertainment center on a 2.75-acre site in downtown San Francisco. Developed by Millenium Partners and WDG Ventures, the project is located within the 87-acre Yerba Buena Center. Within the first few months of its opening in June 1999, Metreon attracted some 2.5 million visitors. As many as 40,000 people have visited on peak-period weekends. The four-level project offers amusements, games, shopping, restaurants, a food court, and cinemas—including a 600-seat SONY•IMAX theater, the largest of its type on the West Coast—enlivening the evening activity of the Yerba Buena Gardens neighborhood. SPECIAL FEATURES Urban entertainment center Downtown development Ground lease Interactive entertainment DEVELOPER Yerba Buena Retail Partners Millenium Partners 1995 Broadway, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10023 212-595-1600 WDG Ventures 107 Stevenson Street 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 415-896-2300 ARCHITECT Simon Martin-Vegue Winkelstein Moris 501 Second Street Suite 701 San Francisco, California 94107 415-546-0400 Gary E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 (Pdf)
    Grants for the Arts Annual Report 2019 / 2020 Contents Grants for the Arts: A Continuing Legacy of Support 3 for San Francisco Arts and Culture Grants for the Arts FY 2019-2020 Budget 5 Grants for the Arts Programs 6 Annual Grants to San Francisco Arts Organizations 7 Parades and Festivals 43 Cultural Centers 46 Re-Granting Programs 47 Grantee Services 48 Arts and Tourism and Other Programs 49 Grants for the Arts 401 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 321 San Francisco, CA 94102 T: 415.554.6710 F: 415.554.6711 www.sfgfta.org GFTA Staff Matthew Goudeau, Director Jason Blackwell, Associate Director Khan Wong, Senior Program Manager Ecaterina Burton, Senior Finance, Data & Operations Analyst Valerie Tookes, Adjunct Senior Operations & Finance Manager Kara Owens, Program Coordinator Annual Report: San Francisco Study Center Edits: Mike Ortiz, Repromail © 2019-2020, Grants for the Arts Cover images: Illuminate the Arts’ Pink Triangle at sunset. PHOTO: Matt Biddulph • Visitors view Ficre Ghebreyesus’ Zemesh Behr’s Magic Garden as part of the Ficre Ghebreyesus: City with a River Running Through exhibition at theMuseum of the African Diaspora. PHOTO: Kelly Stuckley, Jr. • Urban Jazz Dance Company dancers from left to right: Antoine Hunter, Zahna Simon, and Leah Maim Mendelson. PHOTO: RJ Muna • All Nations Drums sing an Honor Song in recognition of Opening Night at the 44th Annual American Indian Film Festival at Brava Theatre. presented by theAmerican Indian Film Institute. PHOTO: BKS Photography • Eye Zen Presents OUT of Site: SOMA with actors, from left to right, Ryan Hayes, Brian Freeman, Marga Gomez, and Landa Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018/2019 (Pdf)
    Grants for the Arts Annual Report 2018 / 2019 1 Grants for the Arts 2018 / 2019 Annual Report Contents Grants for the Arts: A Continuing Legacy of Support 3 for San Francisco Arts and Culture Grants for the Arts FY 2018-2019 Budget 5 Grants for the Arts Programs 6 Annual Grants to San Francisco Arts Organizations 7 Cultural Centers, Civic Events, Regranting Programs 46 San Francisco Arts Media 47 Arts and Tourism — A Partnership with the San Francisco 48 Convention and Visitors Bureau Other Programs 48 Grants for the Arts 401 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 321 San Francisco, CA 94102 T: 415.554.6710 F: 415.554.6711 www.sfgfta.org GFTA Staff Matthew Goudeau, Director Jason Blackwell, Associate Director Valerie Tookes, Senior Finance and Operations Manager Khan Wong, Senior Program Manager Kara Owens, Operations and Program Associate Annual Report: San Francisco Study Center Edits: Mike Ortiz, Repromail © 2018-2019, Grants for the Arts Cover, clockwise, from top: Abigail Munn of Circus Bella performs on the Static Trapeze in Civic Center Commons as part of “Ring Out Loud!” PHOTO: Chris Stoll • NAKA Dance Theater performing Buscarte at the Joe Good Annex. PHOTO: Scott Tsuchitani • Non-Stop Bhangra performing at the USA Premiere of “The Harvest” at theSan Francisco Green Film Festival. PHOTO: Tommy Lau • Ross Travis performing Happy Ending as part of Circus Center Cabaret. PHOTO: Fernando Gambaroni • Mariachi Femenil Orgullo Mexicano performers Jennie Renn and Nydia Gonzalez performing as part of Local Sirens at Women’s Audio Mission. PHOTO: Margot Duane Grants for the Arts 2018 / 2019 Annual Report 2 Annual Report 2018 / 2019 Grants for the Arts: A Continuing Legacy of Support for San Francisco Arts and Culture Photo: Jack Hutch Dear Friends, The history of Grants for the Arts is rooted in the belief that art and culture are integral to keeping San Francisco a vibrant place to live, work, and visit.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Start-Up ELP for Students
    San Francisco Start-up Experiential Learning Program Creative Commons Author:Creative Bogdan Oporowski program at a glance: Discover the roots of Culture Length of program: 2 weeks Day Number of participants: 25 students from around the world entrepreneurship on an Credit points: can potentially be earned by contacting a professor at your home university morning Cost per student: $3.900 (general program) + optional room upgrade experiential learning journey to Free + optional excursions and cultural activities noon Lunch Pitching Time + airfare San Francisco and the infamous competition afternoon Departure Free accommodation, food & beverage "Start-up Consulting Challenge“ Time 1 urban 3 star hostel Silicon Valley! SFO 8 hands-on workshops Golden Review Free Airport daily breakfast evening 4 workshop locations Circle session Time 1 welcome dinner 6 unique team experiences Free Free 1 farewell dinner 1 pitching competition Free Time Time Time team, organization & safety WeekArrival Sundayone Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Departure 2 program coordinators and trainers visits & lectures 4 Fortune 500 company visits 2 local guides Mindset morning 24/7 local emergency contacts 3 company visits Week two 3-5 start-up visits Arrival BMC transportation noon SFO Lunch 1 Venture Capital visit/lecture Part 1 1 private VIP bus 1 incubator & innovation center Airport Design Thinking BMC 1 academic seminar afternoon Sight- you decide: cultural highlights Part 1 and 2 Part 2 seeing Free
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratorium at Pier 15 Project Overview
    Published on AIA Top Ten (http://www.aiatopten.org) Home > Exploratorium at Pier 15 Exploratorium at Pier 15 Project Overview View from the Embarcadero - Photo Credit: Photo by Bruce Damonte Before and After of Pier 15 & 17 - Photo Credit: Photo by Bruce Damonte . The Exploratorium is an internationally known science museum focused on hands-on exhibits of natural phenomena. They recently moved to this new location, carefully restoring the historic Pier 15 on San Francisco’s downtown waterfront. Visitors can now experience 80,000 square feet of science exhibits in the historic structure, with new cafes and event space located in the contrasting modern glazed observatory with unobstructed views of San Francisco Bay. The building also offers a theatre, more than a dozen classrooms, labs, and teacher training rooms, wood and metal workshops, two retail stores, offices, and a large outdoor plaza. The new location has excellent connectivity to the city and includes no parking for the more than 1,000,000 visitors a year. A major new public plaza filled with exhibits and event space replaces the former parking deck between the two piers. It brings public life and energy to a formerly blank stretch of the waterfront. The design takes advantage of the original pier building’s original clerestories for daylighting, 800’ long roof for PVs, and uses the water below for baywater radiant cooling. Location: Pier 15 San Francisco California 94111 United States Project Owner: Exploratorium Submitting Architect: EHDD Project Completion Date: April, 2013 Project Site: Historic structure or district Project Type: Education – General Food Service Restaurant/Cafeteria Public Assembly – Entertainment/Culture Retail Store Project Site Context/Setting: Urban Other Building Description: Both new and renovation New: 37.2% Renovation: 62.8% Building or Project Gross Floor Area: 301,099 square feet BOMA Floor area method used?: No Hours of Operation: Tuesday-Sunday 10:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.; Thursday 6:00 p.m.–10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report Table of Contents
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Executive Director 04 2017 Operating Income 05 2017 Operating Expenses 07 2017 Highlights 09 2017 Program Highlights 11 William K. Bowes Jr. Memorial 13 Paul Doherty Memorial 15 Individual Giving 18 Corporate Supporters 32 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 01 Dear donors and friends, Having recently celebrated my first anniversary as Executive Director, I am still heady with the energy of this extraordinary place and grateful to all the people who make it run: donors, trustees, exhibit developers, teachers, lab technicians, artists, Explainers, and many more. It’s hard to definitively describe the Exploratorium because it is so much more than a science museum, and it holds a unique meaning to everyone who experiences it. However, two distinct “parades” I marched in this past year serve well to exemplify the Exploratorium spirit for me. On March 14 (or 3/14), I was delighted to lead our annual Pi Day procession, followed by more than 300 visitors holding 300 digits of pi. Pi Day was invented at the Exploratorium in 1988, and it is now celebrated in schools, universities, and museums throughout the world. This uniquely Exploratorium holiday honors some of our favorite things: yummy fruit pies, math, tinkering, whimsy, and making the invisible visible and more capable of being understood. Best of all, Pi Day is a community day when we open our doors to an incredibly diverse Bay Area community. The following month, I was proud to walk with friends, colleagues, and the Exploratorium banner in the March for Science in support of curiosity and critical thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Architect / EHDD / Exploratorium San Francisco
    285 EXPLORATORIUM ARCHITECT JUNE 2013 EHDD REIMAGINES A PAIR OF HISTORIC PIERS FOR SAN FRANCISCO’S MOST HANDS-ON Text by Katie Gerfen MUSEUM AND THE CITY’S NEXT GENERATION OF SCIENCE GEEKS. Photos by Bruce Damonte Ask Any San FrAncisco schoolchild to name their favorite field trip of the year, and it’s a safe bet that they will cite the most hands-on museum in town: the Exploratorium. Until recently, that trip entailed piling on a bus and entering the cavernous expanse of the Palace of Fine Arts—a Roman- and Greek-inspired folly, originally designed by Bernard Maybeck for the 1915 Panama–Pacific Exposition. The visits were made all the better by the fact that the classical architecture gave way to a veritable playland of exhibits: static generators that made your hair stand on end; Alice-in- Wonderland-esque rooms that seemed to grow smaller; and cow-eye dis- sections carried out for groups of slightly horrified kids every few hours. But, over time, the landmark space proved something of a liability: The institution was forced to limit the growth of its continuing education and teacher training programs due to lack of space. “The facility wasn’t working—we would have had to cannibalize ourselves,” says Dennis Bartels, the Exploratorium’s executive director. The institution’s board began talking as early as 1991 about renovat- ing or relocating to another site in the city, and, in 1998, they retained local firm EHDD and lead designer Marc L’Italien, FAIA. Once relocation seemed certain, the goal was to find a larger, more accessible space.
    [Show full text]