DOCSLIB.ORG

Curiosity & Wonder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curiosity & Wonder curiosity & wonder Planning Roadmap for Kocaeli Science Center September 2009 3601 Lyon Street San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone +1 415 353-0432 www.exploratorium.edu/exhibit_services Executive Summary 2 Executive Summary : Planning Roadmap for the Kocaeli Science Center The Municipality of Kocaeli engaged the Exploratorium to Master Planning Process develop a master plan to help guide the development of the new Kocaeli Science Center. After visiting the Exploratorium the Kocaeli Science Center project team invited the Exploratorium planning group The Kocaeli Science Center will be located in a portion of to put together a road map or action plan to assist them the former Seka Paper factory in the middle of the newly in implementing their vision. The Exploratorium team created Seka Park. The museum buildings are just over visited Kocaeli for four days at the end of June 2009 and a bridge crossing the railroad tracks from the incredibly conducted a series of workshops and listening sessions popular Seka Park waterfront development. While the with the Project Team, representatives of the Municipality, Science Center will be part of an urban redevelopment and some community leaders. project, the primary purpose will be to support science and technology learning, stimulate curiosity and be a new This plan comes directly from the vision of the project team, cultural attraction for the community. In addition to the the Municipality and the community. It lays out the initial Science Center other arts and cultural organizations will planning ideas and steps to advance the project. Since share the site. there is no one right way to proceed, as decisions are made and opportunities arise, this road map can be used This is an exciting new project, which will have an important to assess those opportunities and address the impacts on impact on the Municipality of Kocaeli, educationally, other parts of the plan. For this reason we have started culturally and by attracting millions of residents and tourists out with a Vision statement and Core Purpose. These will to the area. It is destined to be a model for the whole be used to guide the decisions and planning process going country. forward. 3 Purpose Statement • Target Audiences Increased pride in the community, especially The core purpose of the Kocaeli Science Center emerged through around the planning work and reflects the commitment of the Municipality of Kocaeli to support lifelong science learning for all of its residents and visitors. TOURISTS To change the way people look at and learn about the world. BUSINESSES COMMUNITY Stimulate curiosity, wonder and thinking. GROUps TEACHERS FAMILIES These two statements of core purpose will guide the selection and developmentThese two statements of exhibits, of activities,core purpose programs will guide and theeven sel theection overall and YOUNG PEOPLE organizationdevelopment of of the exhibits, Science activities, Center. programs This is not and to evensay that the there overall won’t (AGES 7 -17) SCHOOL GrOUps be many other significant outcomes and impacts of the Center on the organization of the Science Center. This is not to say that there won’t PRE-PRIMARY FAMILY GrOUps NON-scIENCE ON THEIR OWN Communitybe many other and significant the Municipality. outcomes Additional and impacts outcomes of the will Center include: on the STUDENTS INTEREST Community and the Municipality. Additional outcomes will include: • Increased tourism to Kocaeli UNIVERSITY ADULTS STUDENTS UNIVERSITIES • Increased tourism to Kocaeli • Economic development in area ALONE • Economic development in area • Significant changes in how science is taught and learned in the CHAMBER OF Kocaeli schools INDUSTRY • Significant changes in how science is taught and learned in the Kocaeli schools • A new place for young people to meet and exchange ideas • A new place for young people to meet and exchange ideas • Stimulate dialogue between scientists and general public • Stimulate dialogue between scientists and general public • A community center with conferences, special events and programs • A community center with conferences, special events and programs • Increased pride in the community, especially around science as culture and our industrial heritage 4 Exhibit and Program Values The core purpose establishes the reason for creating the museum and what we hope to attain, and the target audiences establish for whom the museum is being built. Together these form the foundation of the Kocaeli Science Center. The exhibit and program values provide a set of guiding principles that will help the project team select how we will achieve the core purpose. These values outline the most important characteristics of the Kocaeli Science Center museum experience that we hope to achieve. Based on this preliminary work, we feel that the Kocaeli Science Center values: • The importance of self-discovery and asking questions. • The opportunity to learn together. • The family as a core unit for visiting the museum. • A diversity of people visiting our museum. • The whole person, Mind, Body, and Emotions. • The community we live in. • The educational community. • Play, laughter, conversation, and mess. • A curious, energetic, and empowered team. 5 Preliminary Space Plan The initial focus of the planning group has been on the We also feel that it is important to identify possible space for U-shaped building. The total area of this building is future expansion of the Science Center. Many science centers approximately 5,580 m2, including the center atrium space. around the world have developed through multiple expansion Based on the Business Planning analysis, we feel that this stages, while a few have made the mistake of opening too building alone is not enough room for the Science Center, much building at the beginning, drawing critical resources especially if a large format theater is added to the program. from the programming for building operations. The Seka Park For the purposes of this plan, we are recommending that development provides ample opportunity for future expansion additional space be identified in surrounding buildings and in the areas mentioned above. outside to bring the total available space to about 10,000 m2. SECONDSECOND FLOOR First Floor Second Floor SCIENCE THEATER OFFICES SECOND FLOOR n n Walkway to Sensing SPECIAL EXHIBITS Discovery n Traits of Life GALLERY CONFERENCE ROOMS n n STORAGE Entry Hall & The Making Your World U(NIVERSE) AND ME SHARED SPACE Gallery of Wonder n Tinkering Studio n Crossroads & Classroom EXHIBITS TO OFFICES WORKSHOP BRIDGE n THE FUTURE Up, Down & TASTING SMELLING TOUCHING All Around CROSSROADS PORTAL LISTENING FIFIRRSTST FLOOR TO PAPER S E N S IG N n UP, DOWN Children’s & ALL FACTORY SEEING AROUND DYNAMIC MAKING EARTH YOUR Discovery Zone CHILDREN’S AS MAKERS WORLD I DISCOVERY TRAITS FIRST FLOOR n GALLERY Dynamic Earth ZONE OF WATER OF CAEL WONDER KO n LIFE TINKERING Water CAFE ENTRY STORE STUDIO HALL CLASSROOM/ n Portal to Paper ADMISSIONS WET LAB FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR n Science Theater n WALKWAY U(niverse) and Me TO DISCOVERY 6 CLASSROOM/ TINKERING SHOP Preliminary Operating Attendance Potential Assumptions Projecting the attendance potential is one of the most • The attendance potential is for the number of visitors who important factors in a planning study. Many decisions depend come to the Science Center. on this projection and it is often used a measure of success • The lower potential figures are based on a 5,580 m2 for the project. We strongly urge that attendance not be the facility with approximately 4,180 m2 of exhibition space. sole measure of success. It should be considered only one of a handful of measures, including the ones described in • The higher potential estimates reflect about 2,500 m2 of the core purpose. Attendance naturally fluctuates in science additional program space. centers often as much as 20% up and down depending on factors such as special exhibitions, the economy, competition • The exhibitions are of the highest quality, engaging open- and marketing. In addition, almost all new science centers ended experiences as discussed in the planning meetings see a substantially larger attendance in the opening year or and similar to those in the Exploratorium. two than in later, or more stable years. • The facility will be operated consistent with quality ASTC Benchmark data from science centers around the world were science center operations. used to estimate the attendance potential for the Kocaeli Science Center for a normalized, or stable year, four years • A full array of programs, events and festivals, as described after opening. herein will presented. We developed a range of potential attendance estimates based on two different models. Then we selected a mid level assumption of 475,000 visitors per year to use in developing the projected operating budgets. 7 Detailed Expenses and Revenue Attendance 475,000 Projected Operating Budget Admission fee ($US) Adult $7.00 The projected operating budget will provide the Expenses Youth $5.00 Child $3.00 framework for estimating the operating costs The expenses are based on the type of and staffing levels for the new science center. Store per capita revenue $1.00 science center described above. We included No Food Service It can be used to make decisions on things expenses for renewing the exhibition base, like pricing and levels of programming needed Full Time staff 47 Part Time FTE 36 for special traveling exhibits and for enough to serve the visitors. The budget model uses staff so that new program and events can be Revenue a number of key assumptions, such as the Admissions developed and presented. There is a small attendance potential that we have developed. General Public $1,588,875 staff for developing a few new exhibits, but Reserved Groups $235,125 These assumptions are used to develop the Membership $244,460 a large exhibit shop would have to be added Programs $427,500 model, but they can certainly be changed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Image of Chemistry Presented by the Science Museum, London in the Twentieth Century: an International Perspective
    The Image of Chemistry Presented by the Science Museum, London in the Twentieth Century: An International Perspective Peter Morris Abstract: How has chemistry been presented at the Science Museum, London, during the 20 th century? After an overview of the history of the Science Muse- um and its chemistry galleries, four galleries are considered in depth (1906, 1926, 1977, and 1999). The importance of the curators’ external constituency of chemists and chemical educators is emphasized. The image of chemistry at the Science Museum has concentrated on the general utility of chemistry and chemistry as a skilful craft. The presentation has been low-key rather than boosterist. A comparison is made with the chemistry galleries at the Deutsches Museum. Chemistry in the Deutsches Museum has put more emphasis on hands-on exhibits and the chemical industry. Science and technology museums have promoted chemistry in a quiet but successful way for many years, but their influence may have waned along with chemistry kits. Keywords : presentation of chemistry in museums, chemistry collections, chemistry galleries, Science Museum, Deutsches Museum . 1. Introduction Before we examine the image of chemistry that has been presented by the Science Museum during the 20th century, it is worth asking if science and technology museums have any influence on the public’s perception of chem- istry. While the impact of museums is inevitably less than, say, the mass me- dia, they do attract large audiences: the Science Museum had 1.2 million visi- tors in the 1930s, a peak of 4.2 million visitors in 1980 and 2.6 million visitors in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco, California
    updated: 10.18.2017 Compressed Area - 4.5 Miles 2.5 Miles B C D E F G H J K L M N P Q R Fort Point Blue & Gold Blue & Gold San Francisco Bay Red & Fleet to Fleet to Vallejo, 1 Cable Car Route Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco, California USA White Fleet Angel Island Jack London Square 1 (toll south bound) San Francisco Bay Cruise Sausalito & & Oakland Street Car (F-Line) Maritime Tiburon & Bay Cruise Golden Gate National Recreation Area Alcatraz Ferry Service MasonCrissy St Field National PIER Historical Park 45 43 41 39 One Way Traffic 47 431/2 Pre Marina Green s Hyde St id l io Aquatic End of One Way Traffic l Pa rkwa Marina Blvd Pier d y e Park Blue & Gold v l Cervantes Blvd Direction of w Lin Jefferson St Ferry Pier 35 o B co MARINA Fort Mason The Highway Ramps Cruise Terminal D l The Walt n n Cannery Anchorage 2 l E 2 c m 33 Disney FISHERMANS Photo Vantage Points o B ba M c Family Palace Beach St Beach St r l c v n Museum Ghirardelli a & Scenic Views i WHARF d Baker d of Fine Arts L (Main Post) GGNRA Square e North Point St ro 31 BART Station Beach North Point St Headquarters t Shopping Area S Bay St Bay St Bay St Pier 27 a Alcatraz Departure Terminal Parks br James R. Herman m Cruise Terminal R Alha Moscone Francisco St Francisco St 3 Beaches Letterman i Lincoln Blvd c 3 h Rec Ctr THE Veterans Blvd Digital Arts a Chestnut St Points of Interest Center Aver Chestnut St TELEGRAPH EMBARCADERO ds “Crookedest HILL o Hospitals n d Lombard St Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Motion Pictures & Television Program Brochure
    School of Motion Pictures & Television academyart.edu SCHOOL OF MOTION PICTURES & TV Contents Program Overview ...................................................5 What We Teach ......................................................... 7 The School of MPT Difference .................................9 Faculty .....................................................................11 Degree Options ..................................................... 13 Our Facilities ......................................................... 15 Alumni Success ..................................................... 17 Partnerships ......................................................... 19 Career Paths ......................................................... 21 Additional Learning Experiences ......................... 23 Awards and Accolades ......................................... 25 Online Education .................................................. 27 Academy Life ........................................................ 29 San Francisco ....................................................... 31 Athletics ................................................................ 33 Apply Today .......................................................... 35 3 SCHOOL OF MOTION PICTURES & TV Program Overview Taught by professionals working in the industry, including Academy and Emmy Award winners, our students learn their craft through hands-on filmmaking experience. IMMERSE YOURSELF Direct. Produce. Shoot. Edit. Production Design. Write. Crew up and follow your passion
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Grants for the Arts Advisory Panel FY 21 Docket Meeting #1 Action
    Grants for the Arts Advisory Panel FY 21 Docket Meeting #1 Action Minutes Wednesday, May 13, 2020 Virtual via Zoom Advisory Panel Present: Jon Moscone (Chair), Lanita Henriquez (Vice Chair), Kimberly Brandon, Yoyo Chan, Hagen Choi, Erika Gee, Nicola Miner, Pati Navalta Poblete, Marcus Shelby, Debra Walker, Anne Wintroub Mr. Choi departed at noon; Ms. Wintroub was absent from 12:00-12:55 p.m. Staff Present: Jason Blackwell, Ecaterina Burton, Matthew Goudeau, Kara Owens, Khan Wong The meeting was called to order at 10:11 a.m. 1. Approval of Advisory Panel Policy Retreat and Subcommittee Minutes Motion to approve September 10, 2019 Policy Retreat Minutes—Ms. Wintroub so moved; Mr. Shelby seconded. All in favor. Motion to approve October 2, 2019 Subcommittee Minutes—Ms. Wintroub so moved; Ms. Walker seconded. All in favor. 2. Assistance List Docket AfroSolo Theatre Company American Conservatory Theater Brava! For Women in the Arts Cartoon Art Museum Circus Center Frameline Magic Theatre San Francisco Contemporary Music Players The Marsh Theatre Rhinoceros World Arts West Youth Speaks Motion to move Assistant List Docket to Consent Docket for FY21 and return as part of the Discussion Docket in FY22—Ms. Wintroub so moved; Mr. Shelby seconded. All in favor. 1 3. Late Docket American Indian Film Institute Creativity Explored GLBT Historical Society Other Minds Motion to accept Late Applicant Docket for FY21 funding considerations with a 10% penalty that will have further monetary consideration at Docket Meeting #3—Ms. Walker so moved; Ms. Henriquez seconded. Ms. Brandon and Ms. Henriquez opposed. Communication regarding late applications will be discussed in-depth at the annual policy retreat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Mason Extension SPUR Preso 101911
    Extending Success: Streetcars to Ft. Mason Rick Laubscher, Doug Wright, Rich Hillis SPUR, October 19, 2011 Historic Streetcars: Huge SF Success ! “Trolley Festival” started Trolley Festival, 1983 momentum 28 years ago ! Used Market St. surface track ! Chamber-City joint project ! Mayor Feinstein was champion ! Community support led to: ⊕" 5-summer run ⊕" Adoption of permanent F-line F-line, Pier 39, 2000 ! F-line open 1995; to Wharf 2000 ! Today: 23,000+ daily riders ⊕" Most popular vintage line in U.S. ⊕" Service increased to meet demand ⊕" Still more service needed Rail’s Role: Commerce, Commuters, Defense Ferry Bldg. 1927 ! Waterfront rail – 1900-c.1960s ⊕" State Belt freight RR served piers ⊕" Supplies, troops carried to Fort Mason & Presidio on Army track ⊕" 25 streetcar lines served waterfront ♦"World’s 2nd busiest transit hub ! Maritime & defense evolved ⊕" Waterfront’s face changed forever ⊕" Today: recreation, visitor oriented Troop Train at Crissy Field 1941 Fort Mason Streetcar History ! Muni’s H-line served Fort Mason 1914-1948 Fort Mason Streetcar Revival ! Historic waterfront streetcar line repeatedly proposed ⊕" 1970: San Francisco Tomorrow suggests waterfront route ⊕" 1979: First Muni Embarcadero streetcar proposal included in plan ⊕" 1980: GGNRA General Management Plan proposes historic streetcar shuttle from Aquatic Park to Crissy Field ⊕" 1985: I-280 Transfer Study evaluates Caltrain-Fort Mason route ⊕" 2000: F-line extension opens to Wharf ⊕" 2001: Fort Mason Center, Fisherman’s Wharf Merchants, Market Street Railway
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Pdf Version of This Essay (48Kb)
    EVALUATING OUTDOOR EXPLORATORIUM EXHIBITS Joyce Ma Although not all findings from these studies found direct application in the final It was also during this period that we began to envision the Outdoor Exploratorium Senior Researcher exhibits, we learned valuable lessons about supporting outdoor noticing. In as a set of exhibits at one or more distributed sites away from the museum itself. Toni Dancu particular, we identified some of the reasons why visitors spent time noticing outside, We know quite a bit about Exploratorium visitors, but considering remote locations Research Associate including wanting to be in an attractive area, participate in independent exploration, required us to reevaluate our audience assumptions. The team thus began asking and see things they hadn’t noticed before (or familiar things from new perspectives). fundamental questions about the people who might use our exhibits: Who are they? valuation of the Outdoor Exploratorium We also discovered some impediments to exploring and noticing outside, such as What are they doing there? When are they there? We were particularly inspired by began in 2001, years before the project’s limited time, worries about safety (outdoor environments not always being well- the work of William Whyte, who conducted observational studies in the 1970s of 1 final realization as a set of exhibits at Fort bounded or predictable), and self-consciousness about activities that might seem how people use New York City plazas , and we conducted our own set of informal Mason. The Exploratorium has a long history unusual (such as using a magnifying class to examine dirt). Our findings also helped observations to learn about the ‘social life’ of the candidate sites our exhibits might Eof evaluating visitor exhibit experiences to better us redefine project content areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Designs for Learning: Studying Science Museum Exhibits That Do More Than Entertain
    Designs for Learning: Studying Science Museum Exhibits That Do More Than Entertain SUE ALLEN Exploratorium, San Francisco, CA 94123, USA Received 2 October 2003; revised 6 April 2004; accepted 7 April 2004 DOI 10.1002/sce.20016 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). ABSTRACT: Science museum staff face a constructivist dilemma as they design their public spaces: the exhibits should facilitate science learning, yet they also need to support a diverse visiting public in making their own personal choices about where to attend, what to do, and how to interpret their interactions. To be effective as teaching tools, exhibits need to be highly intrinsically motivating at every step of an interaction in order to sustain involvement by an audience who views their visit primarily as a leisure activity. Given these challenges, it is vital to support the design process with a strong program of research and evaluation. I give a personal perspective on one institution’s research and evaluation work over the last decade, focusing on four areas: immediate apprehendability, physical interactivity, conceptual coherence, and diversity of learners. C 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 88(Suppl. 1):S17–S33, 2004 INTRODUCTION: A PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE ON A LEARNING DILEMMA In this article I present a personal perspective on a subset of museum learning environ- ments, specifically the exhibition space of hands-on science museums. This choice is based on my own experience of studying and working in such environments over the last decade at the Exploratorium, a well-known museum of “science, art, and human perception” in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Winnick Family Foundation Completes $100,000 Grant to California Science Center’S Ecosystems Gallery
    Winnick Family Foundation Completes $100,000 Grant to California Science Center’s Ecosystems Gallery The Foundation hopes that the interactive Ecosystems gallery will become an inspiration and model for eco-conscious urban development Los Angeles, CA - November 4, 2010 – The Winnick Family Foundation has completed a $100,000 grant to support the creation of the Ecosystems permanent exhibit gallery at the California Science Center at Exposition Park in Los Angeles. Within the new Ecosystems gallery, guests observe and explore an 188,000-gallon kelp tank teeming with marine life, a desert flash flood, and a special area dedicated to the rich urban ecology of Los Angeles. Adam Winnick, a member of the California Science Center Foundation Board of Trustees, said: “The Ecosystems gallery, which opened in March of this year, is a world-class facility for teaching children and the general public the interconnectedness of all air, water, land and life resources on this planet. We are pleased to be a part of the philanthropic community that supports this unique facility.” Stated Jeffrey Rudolph, President and Chief Executive of the California Science Center Foundation: “The early commitment of the Winnick family to help realize this new interactive gallery was key to our success in convincing others to support the Science Center’s exceptional learning experience. We have become one of the world’s leading science education venues with an astonishing 1.4 million visitors last year alone. With The Winnick Family Foundation support, we can confidently continue in our mission of stimulating curiosity and inspiring science learning among all who visit us.” Added Gary Winnick, Chairman and CEO of Pacific Capital Group: “Our hope is that the interactive Ecosystems gallery will become an inspiration and model for eco-conscious urban development.” About the Winnick Family Foundation The Winnick Family Foundation encourages project-specific programs but also selectively supports capital campaigns and unrestricted gifts to grantee organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Needs and Expectations of Teachers About the Science Museum of Castilla-La Mancha
    SISSA – International School for Advanced Studies Journal of Science Communication ISSN 1824 – 2049 http://jcom.sissa.it/ Article Needs and expectations of teachers about the Science Museum of Castilla-La Mancha Santiago Langreo After serving the community for seven years, the Science Museum of Castilla-La Mancha (MCCM) has decided to renew itself. In this context, a survey of the needs and expectations of the people to which the museum is dedicated plays a major role for the changes planned to prove successful. Teachers are among the main users of the museum, staying at the core of all teaching-learning processes, and play a role as mediators between science and students. This paper analyses the judgements made by teachers about various types of events and teaching resources which are normally provided by science museums and, more specifically, the Science Museum of Castilla-La Mancha. Against that backdrop, science (our content), education (our objective) and the democratic participation of teachers will show a clear route to follow if one wants to achieve quality for our institution and its future events. Highlights The first three results, with values in excess of 4.40, assign great value to experimentation, including workshops and laboratories, as well as touring exhibitions, which bring scientific knowledge to farther places, and the objective of science communication and education. Only 44.6% of respondents reported knowing or having visited other science museums. Among them, only 27% know more than two museums. There is general consensus about the opportunity for museums to increase their quality by improving all their elements, events, resources, activities, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Metreon San Francisco, California
    Metreon San Francisco, California Project Type: Commercial/Industrial Case No: C030001 Year: 2000 SUMMARY A 350,000-square-foot urban entertainment center on a 2.75-acre site in downtown San Francisco. Developed by Millenium Partners and WDG Ventures, the project is located within the 87-acre Yerba Buena Center. Within the first few months of its opening in June 1999, Metreon attracted some 2.5 million visitors. As many as 40,000 people have visited on peak-period weekends. The four-level project offers amusements, games, shopping, restaurants, a food court, and cinemas—including a 600-seat SONY•IMAX theater, the largest of its type on the West Coast—enlivening the evening activity of the Yerba Buena Gardens neighborhood. FEATURES Urban entertainment center Downtown development Ground lease Interactive entertainment Metreon San Francisco, California Project Type: Retail/Entertainment Volume 30 Number 01 January-March 2000 Case Number: C030001 PROJECT TYPE A 350,000-square-foot urban entertainment center on a 2.75-acre site in downtown San Francisco. Developed by Millenium Partners and WDG Ventures, the project is located within the 87-acre Yerba Buena Center. Within the first few months of its opening in June 1999, Metreon attracted some 2.5 million visitors. As many as 40,000 people have visited on peak-period weekends. The four-level project offers amusements, games, shopping, restaurants, a food court, and cinemas—including a 600-seat SONY•IMAX theater, the largest of its type on the West Coast—enlivening the evening activity of the Yerba Buena Gardens neighborhood. SPECIAL FEATURES Urban entertainment center Downtown development Ground lease Interactive entertainment DEVELOPER Yerba Buena Retail Partners Millenium Partners 1995 Broadway, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10023 212-595-1600 WDG Ventures 107 Stevenson Street 5th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 415-896-2300 ARCHITECT Simon Martin-Vegue Winkelstein Moris 501 Second Street Suite 701 San Francisco, California 94107 415-546-0400 Gary E.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratorium Ciencia Pública: Summative Report
    Ciencia Pública Summative Report Exploratorium Fall 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Overview 5 Methods 7 Results 10 Socio-Political Context 11 Community Response to the Parklet 13 Awareness/Understanding of Featured Content 16 Watering Plants 17 Salt Water 18 Water Vapor 19 Rain 20 Bilingual Labels 21 Diversity within Latino Family Groups 23 Community Partnership 27 Conclusions and Insights 31 References 35 Appendices 37 Credits All photos: Garibay Group except p. 11 top: Catherine South; p. 11 bottom: Wilson, New York Times Garibay Group | Exploratorium | Ciencia Pública | Summative Evaluation | Fall 2015 2 Executive Summary Ciencia Pública is a National Science Foundation (NSF) -funded collaboration between the Exploratorium, the Boys and Girls Club of San Francisco (BGCSF), and Buena Vista Horace Mann School (BVHM). The Parklet houses exhibits focused on the themes of water and sustainable water use and is intended to engage Latino families in its location, the Mission District neighborhood (the Mission). Using a culturally responsive approach, Garibay Group conducted a summative evaluation to assess project outcomes. Overall, this study found that the Ciencia Community Response Awareness/Understanding Pública project met its goals. Below, we All participants in this study saw value in the There was strong evidence that families summarize key findings. Parklet, particularly due to its subject matter. engaged with both the exhibits and the STEM They believed the Parklet helped raise content. While the drought was a familiar topic Socio-Political Context awareness about the drought in California and to all participants, the experiences at the Any project which focuses on and is situated reminded the community of the importance of Parklet provided opportunities for participants within a specific community will be affected by conserving water.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 (Pdf)
    Grants for the Arts Annual Report 2019 / 2020 Contents Grants for the Arts: A Continuing Legacy of Support 3 for San Francisco Arts and Culture Grants for the Arts FY 2019-2020 Budget 5 Grants for the Arts Programs 6 Annual Grants to San Francisco Arts Organizations 7 Parades and Festivals 43 Cultural Centers 46 Re-Granting Programs 47 Grantee Services 48 Arts and Tourism and Other Programs 49 Grants for the Arts 401 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 321 San Francisco, CA 94102 T: 415.554.6710 F: 415.554.6711 www.sfgfta.org GFTA Staff Matthew Goudeau, Director Jason Blackwell, Associate Director Khan Wong, Senior Program Manager Ecaterina Burton, Senior Finance, Data & Operations Analyst Valerie Tookes, Adjunct Senior Operations & Finance Manager Kara Owens, Program Coordinator Annual Report: San Francisco Study Center Edits: Mike Ortiz, Repromail © 2019-2020, Grants for the Arts Cover images: Illuminate the Arts’ Pink Triangle at sunset. PHOTO: Matt Biddulph • Visitors view Ficre Ghebreyesus’ Zemesh Behr’s Magic Garden as part of the Ficre Ghebreyesus: City with a River Running Through exhibition at theMuseum of the African Diaspora. PHOTO: Kelly Stuckley, Jr. • Urban Jazz Dance Company dancers from left to right: Antoine Hunter, Zahna Simon, and Leah Maim Mendelson. PHOTO: RJ Muna • All Nations Drums sing an Honor Song in recognition of Opening Night at the 44th Annual American Indian Film Festival at Brava Theatre. presented by theAmerican Indian Film Institute. PHOTO: BKS Photography • Eye Zen Presents OUT of Site: SOMA with actors, from left to right, Ryan Hayes, Brian Freeman, Marga Gomez, and Landa Lakes.
    [Show full text]