DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Use Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Use Report Land Use Report St. Louis County Comprehensive Land Use Plan St. Louis County, Minnesota Prepared by: E NGINEERS ■■■■■P'I'"' ' ,,~F'JIIII■ , APPLIED PLANNER S i T. j ECOLOGICAL DE S IGNERS Consulting Group, Inc. =~i.illJi~.11Jil SERVICES Date: October 24, 2018 SRF No. 10360 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Land Use Report CONTENTS Introduction and Terminology ........................................................................................................................ 5 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Education (Entire County) ............................................................................................................................. 10 Health Indicators ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Housing Characteristics .................................................................................................................................. 14 Economic Characteristics ............................................................................................................................... 17 Infrastructure/Utilities .................................................................................................................................... 25 Emergency Services ......................................................................................................................................... 25 Recreation & Tourism ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Cultural and Historical Resources ................................................................................................................. 32 Existing Land Use ............................................................................................................................................ 34 Existing Zoning ................................................................................................................................................ 38 Transportation .................................................................................................................................................. 41 Population Projections .................................................................................................................................... 51 Housing Projections, County Zoning Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 54 Employment Projections, County Zoning Jurisdiction .............................................................................. 55 Land Use Capacity ........................................................................................................................................... 56 Natural Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 57 Land Use Suitability Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 65 Key Challenges and Opportunities in 2035 ................................................................................................. 70 References and Resources .............................................................................................................................. 72 2 | P a g e Comprehensive Land Use Plan Land Use Report FIGURES Figure 1: County Sub-region Comparison, Population Change between 2010 and 2015 ....................... 7 Figure 2: Population Pyramid, Countywide - 2015 ....................................................................................... 8 Figure 3: Population Pyramid, County Zoning Jurisdiction - 2015 ............................................................ 9 Figure 4: Population Pyramid, County Cities - 2015 .................................................................................... 9 Figure 5: St. Louis County Educational Attainment and Median Income by Attainment .................... 11 Figure 6: School Enrollment Percent Change, 2009 to 2016 .................................................................... 12 Figure 7: Barriers to Physical Inactivity ........................................................................................................ 13 Figure 8: Comparison - Percentage Overweight or Obese ........................................................................ 13 Figure 9: Distribution of Housing Stock by Year Structure Built ............................................................ 15 Figure 10: Mortgage as a Percent of Income - 2015 ................................................................................... 15 Figure 11: Rent as Percent of Income - 2015 .............................................................................................. 16 Figure 12: Distribution of Total Household Income by Percentage of Total Earners ......................... 18 Figure 13: County Sub-region Comparison – Median Household Income 2015................................... 19 Figure 14: Employment by Industry ............................................................................................................. 21 Figure 15: Average Payroll per Employee for 2015 (Entire County) ....................................................... 22 Figure 16: Farm by Size, 2002 to 2012 ......................................................................................................... 24 Figure 17: Fire Department Jurisdiction and County Response Districts ............................................... 27 Figure 18: Areas Within NFPA Standard Response Time ........................................................................ 28 Figure 19: Tourism Resources ....................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 20: Existing Land Use – County Zoning Jurisdiction .................................................................... 35 Figure 21: County Mining and Related Features ......................................................................................... 37 Figure 22: Existing Zoning – County Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 40 Figure 23: Existing Jurisdictional Road Classification ................................................................................ 42 Figure 24: St. Louis County Roadway Functional Classification .............................................................. 44 Figure 25: Recent Average Daily Traffic Levels .......................................................................................... 47 Figure 26: Total Paved Road Miles - 2014 Condition (Pavement Quality Index Status) ...................... 48 Figure 27: Minnesota Demographic Center Population Projection – St. Louis County ....................... 52 Figure 28: Population Projections – County Less Duluth ......................................................................... 53 Figure 29: Population Projection – County Zoning Jurisdiction .............................................................. 54 Figure 30: Residential Designation Demand/Surplus ................................................................................ 56 Figure 31: Employment Designation Demand/Surplus ............................................................................ 57 Figure 32. Existing Land Cover Percentages in St. Louis County (based on NLCD 2011) ................. 60 Figure 33: Natural Areas Framework Map .................................................................................................. 63 Figure 34: Moderate Development Assessment Results ............................................................................ 68 Figure 35: High Intensity Development Assessment Results ................................................................... 69 3 | P a g e Comprehensive Land Use Plan Land Use Report TABLES Table 1: Population Change Comparison 1970 to 2015 .............................................................................. 5 Table 2: Racial/Ethnicity Composition, 2015 ............................................................................................... 6 Table 3: Commuter Breakdown in St. Louis County, 2014 ....................................................................... 16 Table 4: Industry Growth and Decline, 2010-2015 .................................................................................... 21 Table 5: National Register of Historic Places, County Zoning Jurisdiction ........................................... 33 Table 6: Existing Land Use Summary – County Zoning Jurisdiction ...................................................... 34 Table 7: Existing Zoning Summary – County Jurisdiction ........................................................................ 39 Table 8: St. Louis County Functional Road Classification ........................................................................ 45 Table 9: Housing Projections – County Zoning Jurisdiction .................................................................... 55 Table 10: Employment Projections – County Zoning Jurisdiction .......................................................... 55 Table 11. Existing Land Cover Acres in St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Border Security Threatens Northern Border Wildernesses
    Wilderness In Peril: Border Security Measures Threaten Wilderness along the Northern Border with Canada An Analysis Prepared by Wilderness Watch October 2012 Wilderness Watch P.O. Box 9175 Missoula, MT 59807 406-542-2048 www.wildernesswatch.org For more information, contact: George Nickas, Executive Director Kevin Proescholdt, Conservation Director [email protected] [email protected] 406-542-2048 612-201-9266 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………...…………….Page 3 Introduction………………………………………………………..………..….....Page 4 Background…………………………………………………..………………....…Page 4 A. Early 20th Century Border Easements B. International Boundary Treaties with Canada C. 2005 REAL ID Act D. 2006 Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Border Patrol Practices on the Southern Border and Lessons for the North……………………………………………………………….Page 9 A. Border Wall Construction B. Illegal Roads and Vehicle Routes C. Border Security Infrastructure D. Motorized Patrols Emerging Major Threats to Wildernesses near the Northern Border……...…Page 13 A. Congressional Legislation B. Northern Border Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement C. 2006 MOU and Motorized Patrols D. Administrative Waiver of Federal Laws E. Clearing and Construction in Border Reservations F. Conclusion Needed Actions to Reestablish and Affirm Wilderness Protections Along the Northern Border……………………………………….……………..Page 17 A. Existing Homeland Security Laws B. 2006 MOU C. Northern Border PEIS D. Pending Legislation E. Restore Wilderness Protection Appendix - Wildernesses at Risk along the Northern Border………………....Page 18 3 Executive Summary Under the guise of border security, a plethora of new and proposed laws, policies, memoranda, and other governmental actions pose an unprecedented threat to Wildernesses, including in many national parks, along our nation’s Northern Border. This whitepaper describes the threats and presents several recommendations for securing the protection of Wilderness and parks along the Northern Border.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6232 Department of Natural Resources Big G a M E
    MINNESOTA RULES 2008 4 6 4 CHAPTER 6232 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BIG G A M E 6 2 3 2 0 4 0 0 REGISTRATION OF DEER 6232 3800 APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR A MOOSE 6 2 3 2 0 6 0 0 SEASONS AND ZONES FOR TAKING DEER BY LICENSE ARCHERY 6232 4100 MOOSE ZONES 6232 1400 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS 6 2 3 2 4 4 0 0 GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR TAKING ELK 6232 1500 ARMS USE AREAS AND RESTRICTIONS 6232 4500 ELK LICENSE APPLICATION PROCEDURE 6 2 3 2 1980 TAKING DEER BY ANY WEAPON USING 6232 4600 ELK ZONES DISEASE MANAGEMENT PERMITS 6232 4700 REGISTRATION BLOCKS 6232 2900 BEAR PERMIT PROCEDURES 6232.0400 REGISTRATION OF DEER. Subpart 1 [Repealed, 20 SR 2287] Subp 2 Registration requirements. Persons tagging a deer must present the deer for registration at a designated deer registration station or agent of the commissioner and obtam a big game possession tag [For text of items A and B, see MR.] [For text ofsubps 3 and 4, see M R ] Subp 5 Deer taken in the special bovine tuberculosis area. Deer taken in the spe­ cial bovine tuberculosis area (deer area 101) must be registered prior to transport outside the area. Statutory Authority: MS s 97A 535, 97B 311 History: 33 SR 215 6232.0600 SEASONS AND ZONES FOR TAKING DEER BY ARCHERY. Subpart 1 Open dates. The open dates for taking deer by archery are from the Satur­ day nearest September 16 through December 31. Subp 2 [Repealed, 33 SR 215] Subp 3 [Repealed, 20 SR 2287] Statutory Authority: MS s 97B 311 History: 33 SR 215 6232.1400 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Not Navigate with This
    Sand Point/ Namakan Crane Lake Lake TYPE TABLE TYPE TENT PAD FIRE RING ACCESS FOOD LOCKER TABLE PRIVY TENT PAD FIRE RING ACCESS FOOD LOCKER PRIVY S1 Brown’s Bay SC 2 1 Soft 0 1 1 N1 Birch Cove Island SC 0 1 Sand 1 1 1 S2 Brown’s Bay HB 0 1 Soft 0 0 0 N3 Leach Bay SC 2 1 Sand 1 1 1 R58 S3 Brown’s Bay View LC 4 1 Dock 2 2 1 N4 Cove Bay SC 0 1 Sand 1 1 1 N6 Deep Slough HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 R56 R3 S4 Burnt Island SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 eary S5 Feldt Channel SC 2 1 Soft 1 1 1 N7 Depthfinder Island SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 R27 R19 R13 S6 Granite Cliff North SC 2 1 Sand 1 1 1 N8 Depthfinder View HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 Lake R14 R25 S7 Granite Cliff South SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 N9 Ebel’s HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 S8 Grassy Bay HB 0 1 Soft 0 0 0 N10 Fox Island SC 0 1 Sand 0 1 1 R32 R33 S9 Houseboat Island West SC 2 1 Sand 1 1 1 N11 Hamilton Island East SC 0 1 Sand 1 1 1 Anderson Bay S10 King Pin LC 4 1 Dock 2 2 1 N12 Hoist Bay SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 S11 King Williams Narrows SCG 10 5 Dock 5 5 1 N13 Johnson Bay SC 2 1 Rock 1 1 1 N14 Junction Bay SC 0 1 Rock 1 1 1 d S12 Mukooda Lake SCG 0 5 Dock 5 5 1 n N15 Catamaran SC 0 1 Dock 0 1 1 a S13 North Island West SC 0 1 Soft 1 1 1 l S14 Norway Island LC 4 1 Sand 2 2 1 N16 Kettle Portage SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 Is Ryan B18 t l S15 Reef Island SC 2 1 Sand 1 1 1 N17 McManus Island HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 n e N18 McManus Island West SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 Lake i n S16 Sand Point Island East HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 o n S17 South Island SC 2 1 Rock 1 1 1 N19 Mica Bay Beach HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 P a S18 Stoneburner Island SC 2 1 Soft 1 1 1 N20 Mica Island SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 B2 k h N21 Mitchell Bay HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 a C S19 Wolf Island SC 2 1 Dock 1 1 1 N22 Mitchell Island West HB 0 1 Sand 0 0 0 O S20 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For .additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property__________________________________________________ historic name Height of Land Portage_____________________________________ other names/site number Hauteur de Terre Portage; Portage of the Twelve Poses_______ 2. Location street & number off County Road 138 I 1 not for publication city, town Embarrass, White, and Pike Townships vicinity Biwab ik state Minnesota code 2 2 county St. Louis code 137 zip code 55708 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property [lei private [~~1 building(s) Contributing Noncontributing [x] public-local [X] district ___jt___ buildings l~xl public-State CD site . ___ sites HU public-Federal PI structure 4 structures I I object ____ objects 8 Total Name of related multiple
    [Show full text]
  • Kettle Falls Hotel
    FE: Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE 1 NTERIOR STA " (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Minnesota cou NTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORI C PLACES St. Louis : ORM INVENTORY - NOMINATION F FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTF*Y DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) JA^f 1 1 1975 ::::SO:::£8P^ COMMON: S'i'f -' 'g ' \ 'V-*-'-~"* \ ?. —-^ 1 ~t~~Ji * v^^ ^ ,' • Kettle Falls Hotel AND/OR HISTORIC: — /y^EiiiVED x|; Kettle Falls Hotel 111 ig^iidpyy)^^ STREET AND NUMBER: •£- tf~4 fe(&JL> o*"^ " 'H-®--*- '-."A NATIONAL i Sectiori? 33, T70N, R48W \^x REGISTER x^J CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTv/>,, j <^V Ray /\s-*~£* , Eig]tith ^^^TpyTV ^ STATE CODE COUNTY: ~x— *— — ; — -— CODE Minnesota 22 . St. Louis 137 ||||l|i||||ilPllill;: -' I •&:;% ;;: •?£$ CATEGORY STATUS ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC Q District [^ Building O Public Public Acquisition: g1 Occupied Yes: i M .j D Restricted D Site Q Structure 0 Private Q In Process r- j Unoccupied -, _. , [23 Unrestricted D Object | | Both JJ2JJ Being Considered pJ Preservation work in progress ' — ' PRESENT USE •' Jheck One or More as Appropriate; 1 1 Agricultural 1 1 Government 1 1 Park n T ransportation 1 1 Comments (X) Commercial [~~1 Industrial | | Privc ite Residence | | Ol her rSoecift,! Hotel O Educational L~H Military Q Relic)ious f~) Entertainment CD Museum | | Scieritific OWNER'S NAME: STATE- Charles Williams Minnesota STREET AND NUMBER: 622 - 12th Avenue CITY OR TOWN: STATE: CODF International Falls Minnesota 22 COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: COUNTY: St. Louis County Courthouse - Registry of Deeds St.Louis STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: STATE CODE Ely Minnesota 22 ^ TITLE OF SURVEY: Statewide Historic Sites Survey NUMBER^,ENTRY -n O DATE OF SURVEY: 9/6/74 O Federal ££] State Q County Q Local 73 DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: fe Z Y* 1J CO \S C Minnesota Historical Societv </> STREET AND NUMBER: m O Building 25, Fort Snelling r-z CITY OR TOWN: STATE: CODE -< St.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-1000-17964-2 E-015/Tl-06-1624 State of Minnesota
    7-1000-17964-2 E-015/TL-06-1624 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE In the Matter of the Application for a High FINDINGS OF FACT, Voltage Transmission Line Route Permit CONCLUSIONS AND for the Tower 115 kV Transmission Project RECOMMENDATION This matter was assigned to Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard C. Luis, acting as a Hearing Examiner for the Minnesota Department of Commerce (Department). A public hearing was held on May 22, 2007. No evidentiary hearings were held. The public hearing record closed on June 11, 2007, when a Brief and Proposed Findings were filed by David Moeller, Attorney for Minnesota Power, 30 West Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55802. Appearances: Robert Lindholm, Manager-Environmental Strategic Initiatives for Minnesota Power, 30 West Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55802 appeared on behalf of Minnesota Power. Carole Schmidt, Supervisor, Transmission Permitting and Compliance for Great River Energy, 17845 East Highway 10, P.O. Box 800, Elk River, MN 55330 appeared on behalf of Great River Energy (GRE), together with Gary Ostrom, Land Rights Manager for GRE. Bill Storm, Minnesota Department of Commerce – Energy Facility Permitting, 85 7th Place East, Suite 500, St. Paul, MN 55101 appeared on behalf of the Department. Ken Wolf, Regulation Unit Manager for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) – Reliability and Facilities Permitting, 121 7th Place East, Suite 350, St. Paul, MN 55101 appeared on behalf of the Commission staff. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This matter was initiated on December 22, 2006, when Minnesota Power (MP) and Great River Energy (GRE) filed a joint application for a routing permit (RP) with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC” or the Commission).1 MP and GRE (jointly, “the Utilities”) had notified the PUC by letter dated November 29, 2006, that the Utilities intended to proceed under the Alternative Permitting Process.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Tier National High Adventure Program Boy Scouts of America
    Northern Tier National High Adventure Program Boy Scouts of America 2012 EXPEDITION & ROUTE PLANNING GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Policies 2 & 3 Contact Information 3 Safety Afloat and Safe Swim Defense Plans 4 Risk Advisory and Prevention of Problems 5 & 6 Fiscal Information 7 - 9 Crew Information 10 Physical Conditioning and Preparation 11 Expedition Planning Information 12 - 15 Charles L. Sommers Wilderness Canoe Base – Ely Minnesota 16 - 35 Prices, Crew Size, Camping Permits, Permit Fees 16 & 17 Canadian Customs, U.S. Customs, Special Restrictions, RABC 18 General Base Information 19 How to Get to the Ely Base 20 Map to Base 21 Detailed Transportation, Off Base Accommodations and Attractions 22 Fishing 22 & 23 Routes 24 Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Routes 25 - 28 Quetico Provincial Park Routes 29 - 33 Ely to Atikokan Routes 34 & 35 Donald Rogert Canoe Base – Atikokan, Ontario 36 - 59 Prices, Crew Size, Camping Permits, Permit Fees 36 & 37 Canadian Customs, U.S. Customs, Special Restrictions 37 General Base Information 38 Shuttle Into and Out of the Wilderness 38 & 39 How to Get to the Atikokan Base 39 Map to Base 40 Ground Transportation Services, Driving Times 41 Off Base Accommodations and Attractions 42 Fishing 42 Routes, Comparison of Parks 43 – 44 Ground Shuttle Information, Float Plane Options 45 Quetico Provincial Park Routes 46 – 49 Crown Lands Routes 50 – 54 Atikokan to Ely Routes 55 & 56 Canadian Fishing Expedition 57 & 58 Canadian Kayaking Trek 59 Northern Expeditions Canoe Base – Bissett, Manitoba 60
    [Show full text]
  • International Boundary Commission United States and Canada Joint Annual Report 2014
    International Boundary Commission United States and Canada Joint Annual Report 2014 International Commission Boundary de la frontière Commission internationale The Honorable John Kerry The Secretary of State for the United States Washington, D.C. The Honorable Robert Nicholson Minister of Foreign Affairs Ottawa Dear Mr. Kerry and Mr. Nicholson: We have the honor to submit herewith to each government a joint report of the Commissioners regarding the maintenance and regulatory work performed in the calendar year 2014 with respect to the International Boundary between the United States and Canada. This is the 90th annual joint report submitted by the Commissioners under the provision of Article IV of the Treaty of Washington, February 24, 1925. This report contains a complete account of all boundary inspection and maintenance work executed from January 1st to December 31st, 2014. Respectfully submitted, Kyle K. Hipsley Peter Sullivan Commissioner, United States Commissioner, Canada United States Canada 2000 L Street, 588 rue Booth Street N.W. Suite 615, Room/bureau 210 Washington, Ottawa, Canada DC 20036 U.S.A. K1A 0E9 Tel: (202) 736-9100 Tel/Tél: (613) 992-1294 Fax: (202) 632-2008 Fax/Télécopieur: (613) 947-1337 International Boundary Commission Joint Annual Report 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Border Ecologies in Boundary Waters
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2016-11 Border Flows: A Century of the Canadian-American Water Relationship Heasley, Lynne; Macfarlane, Daniel University of Calgary Press http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51751 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca BORDER FLOWS: A Century of the Canadian- American Water Relationship Edited by Lynne Heasley and Daniel Macfarlane ISBN 978-1-55238-896-9 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logging Era at LY Oyageurs National Park Historic Contexts and Property Types
    The Logging Era at LY oyageurs National Park Historic Contexts and Property Types Barbara Wyatt, ASLA Institute for Environmental Studies Department of Landscape Architecture University of Wisconsin-Madison Midwest Support Office National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska This report was prepared as part of a Cooperative Park Service Unit (CPSU) between the Midwest Support Office of the National Park Service and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The grant was supervised by Professor Arnold R. Alanen of the Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and administered by the Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin­ Madison. Cover Photo: Logging railroad through a northern Minnesota pine forest. The Virginia & Rainy Lake Company, Virginia, Minnesota, c. 1928 (Minnesota Historical Society). - -~------- ------ - --- ---------------------- -- The Logging Era at Voyageurs National Park Historic Contexts and Property Types Barbara Wyatt, ASLA Institute for Environmental Studies Department of Landscape Architecture University of Wisconsin-Madison Midwest Support Office National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 1999 This report was prepared as part of a Cooperative Park Service Unit (CPSU) between the Midwest Support Office of the National Park Service and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The grant was supervised by Professor Arnold R. Alanen of the Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and administered by the Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainy River-Headwaters Watershed Is Undeveloped and Utilized for Timber Production, Hunting, Fishing, Hiking, and Other Recreational Opportunities (MPCA 2017)
    Rainy River - Headwaters August 2021 Draft Rainy River - Headwaters Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report Authors Moriya Rufer, HEI Scott Kronholm, HEI Nathaniel Baeumler, HEI Jeremiah Jazdzewski, HEI Section 2.5.4, Drinking Water Protection, provided by MDH Edits by Amy Mustonen, MPCA Contributors/acknowledgements MPCA BWSR 1854 Treaty Authority Amy Mustonen Erin Loeffler Tyler Kaspar Jenny Jasperson Jeff Hrubes Angus Vaughn Lake County SWCD Jesse Anderson MDH Tara Solem Nate Mielke Chris Parthun Emily Nelson Ben Lundeen Tracy Lund Derrick Passe Mel Markert Sonja Smerud USFS Theresa Sagan DNR Marty Rye Ben Nicklay Darren Lilja North St. Louis SWCD Edie Evarts Emily Creighton Phil Norvitch Kevin Peterson Jason Butcher Becca Reiss Brent Flatten Anita Provinzino Dean Paron Voyageurs National Park Karl Koller Ryan Maki Cook County SWCD Sam Martin Ilena Hansel Cliff Bentley Taylor Nelson Vermilion Community College Anna Hess Wade Klingsporn Richard Biemiller Tom Burri Steve Persons Kim Boland Editing and graphic design PIO staff Graphic design staff Administrative Staff Cover photo: Kawishiwi Falls, Ely, MN Scott Kronholm, HEI Document number: wq-ws4-87a Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ i Executive summary ............................................................................................................................ vii 1. Watershed background and description ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Coastal Management Program and Final
    PART VII APPENDICES PART VII APPENDIX A Acronyms and Glossary APPENDIX A LIST OF ACRONYMS ACP Agricultural Conservation Program AOC Area of Concern APC Area of Particular Concern ARDC Arrowhead Regional Development Commission ASCS Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service ATB America The Beautiful ATON Aids to Navigation ATV All Terrain Vehicles AUAR Alternative Urban Areawide Review BMP Best Management Practices BWCAW Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness BWSR Board of Water and Soil Resources CAA Clean Air Act CAC Citizens Advisory Committee CBRS Coastal Barrier Resources System CDF Confined Disposal Facility CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CLG Certified Local Government CMP Coastal Management Program CNPC Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program COE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRP Conservation Reserve Program CWA Clean Water Act CWP Clean Water Partnership CZARA Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments of 1990 CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program and Final EIS - May 1999 Part VII A-1 DFW Division of Fish and Wildlife DM&IR Duluth, Mesabi and Iron Range DMMP Dredged Material Management Plan DNR Department of Natural Resources DOF Department of Forestry DTED Department of Trade and Economic Development EAW Environmental Assessment Worksheet EHA Erosion Hazard Areas EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA Environmental Protection Agency
    [Show full text]