Harvard Divinity School William Law, Behmenism, and Counter Enlightenment Author(s): C. D. A. Leighton Source: The Harvard Theological Review, Vol. 91, No. 3 (Jul., 1998), pp. 301-320 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Harvard Divinity School Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509986 Accessed: 26-10-2017 08:06 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Cambridge University Press, Harvard Divinity School are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Harvard Theological Review This content downloaded from 139.179.72.198 on Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:06:56 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms William Law, Behmenism, and Counter Enlightenment C. D. A. Leighton Department of History, Bilkent University, Ankara The importance of William Law has never been in doubt. Scholars have regarded him as an extremely effective High Church apologist by virtue of his replies to Bishop Benjamin Hoadly on ecclesiology and eucharistic theology, and as an influential pastoral guide by virtue of the success of his Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life. He is also considered the most notable post-Refor- mation English mystic by virtue of his later works, written under the influence of the early seventeenth-century Silesian theosophist, Jacob Bohme.