DOCSLIB.ORG

Chromospheric Activity of Stars with Planets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chromospheric Activity of Stars with Planets A&A 530, A73 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015314 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Chromospheric activity of stars with planets B. L. Canto Martins, M. L. das Chagas, S. Alves, I. C. Leão, L. P. de Souza Neto, and J. R. de Medeiros Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] Received 30 June 2010 / Accepted 25 March 2011 ABSTRACT Context. Signatures of chromospheric activity enhancement have been found for a dozen stars, pointing to a possible star-planet interaction. Nevertheless in the coronal activity regime, there is no conclusive observational evidence of such an interaction. Does star-planet interaction manifest itself only for a few particular cases, without having a major effect on stars with planets in general? Aims. We aim to add additional observational constraints to support or reject the major effects of star-planet interactions in stellar activity, based on Ca II chromospheric emission flux. Methods. We performed a statistical analysis of Ca II emission flux of stars with planets, as well as a comparison between Ca II and X-ray emission fluxes, searching for dependencies on planetary parameters. Results. In the present sample of stars with planets, there are no significant correlations between chromospheric activity indica- tor log(RHK) and planetary parameters. Furthermore, the distribution of the chromospheric activity indicator for stars without planets is indistinguishable from the one with planets. Key words. planet-star interactions – stars: activity – stars: chromospheres – stars: coronae – stars: statistics 1. Introduction be associated to coronal manifestations of star-planet interaction. According to Poppenhaeger et al. (2010), any trends in the X-ray Since the pioneering discovery by Mayor & Queloz (1995)– luminosity versus planet orbital parameters seem to be domi- a little more than a decade ago – of a planet orbiting the star nated by selection effects. In addition, Fares et al. (2010) reports 51 Peg, more than 450 other exoplanets have been found at the no clear evidence of star-planet magnetospheric interactions in time of writing (e.g., Schneider 2010). The discovered planets HD 189733. In this context, let us recall that, more recently from have masses ranging from 4 Earth masses to 11 Jupiter masses. a comparison of the distribution of the rotation of stars with and They can be found at distances of several AU or close to the without detected planets, Alves et al. (2010) have shown that the parent star, with orbital periods ranging from a few days to v sin i distribution for these two families of stars is drawn from a few years. High eccentricity is a common parameter connect- the same population distribution function. ing these lanets (e.g., Marcy et al. 2001). Because the observational basis of stellar activity enhance- These discoveries have inspired intensive studies of the phys- ment due to star-planet interaction has clearly not yet been es- ical properties of the planets and of their parent stars, including tablished, in the present study we report a statistical analysis of a possible star-planet interaction. Indeed, in an analogy to bi- stellar CaII chromospheric emission flux for a sample of 74 stars nary stars, which show a higher activity level compared to sin- with planets, as described in the following sections. For a more gle stars, at very close distances, one might also expect plan- solid analysis of the behavior of chromospheric and coronal ac- ets to play a role in the level of activity of their host stars. tivity of stars with planets, it is essential to conduct a compar- Nevertheless, observational data, still at a very informative level, ative analysis of stars without detected planets. This is one of demonstrate that star-planet interaction appears to be more com- the major goals of the current study. In this context, we also an- plex than the widely accepted star-star interaction in close bi- alyzed the CaII chromospheric emission flux of a comparison nary systems. For instance, Shkolnik et al. (2003, 2008) report a sample of 26 stars without detected planets. The paper is orga- planet-induced chromospheric activity on two stars with planets, nized as follows. In Sect. 2 we present the characteristics of the HD 179949 and υ And, apparent from the night-to-night modu- working samples, in Sect. 3 we describe our findings with a brief lation of the CaII H and K chromospheric emission phased with discussion, and finally we outline our conclusions in Sect. 4. the hot Jupiter’s orbit. In addition, Kashyap et al. (2008) claim that stars with close-in giant planets are on average more X-ray active than those with planets that are more distant, an observa- 2. Stellar working sample and data tional result consistent with the hypothesis that giant planets in Different methods, such as radial velocity measurements (Butler close proximity to the parent stars could influence stellar mag- et al. 1996; de Medeiros et al. 2009) and photometric light curves netic activity. (Konacki et al. 2003, 2004), have been used to discover new By contrast, Poppenhaeger et al. (2010) find no significant planetary systems around other stars than the Sun. Aiming to correlations between X-ray luminosity and planetary parame- make our sample homogeneous, we only use stars that had their ters, suggesting no major average activity enhancement in the planets discovered with radial velocity method. corona of stars with planets. Indeed, these authors find no addi- The present stellar working sample consists of selected tional detectable effects in coronal X-ray luminosity that could objects from the base of extrasolar planets maintained by Article published by EDP Sciences A73, page 1 of 6 A&A 530, A73 (2011) Jean Schneider (Schneider 2010), updated on October 6, 2009, when there were 235 planets cataloged by the method in vari- ation in the radial velocity (RV). We checked which of these stars presented Ca II emission flux detected in the catalog of Wright et al. (2004). After this selection, we filtered the com- plete stellar sample to obtain a subset of main-sequence stars that are within 20 pc in the solar neighborhood. Our final work- ing sample consists of 74 stars with planets with spectral types in the F-G-K interval, as presented in Table 1. The chromospheric activity indicator, log(RHK), for all stars was computed from the Ca II H and K line-core emission in- dex listed by Wright et al. (2004), following the procedure of converting emission index S to the flux at the stellar surface pro- posed by Noyes et al. (1984). To diagnose coronal activity of the stars forming the above-mentioned stellar sample, we used the coronal activity indicator, log( LX ), that was computed us- Lbol ing the X-ray fluxes listed by Kashyap et al. (2008)and Poppenhaeger et al. (2010). Readers are referred to these works for a discussion of the observational procedures, data reduction, and error analysis. Stellar luminosities were determined as follows. First, appar- ent visual magnitudes (mv) and trigonometric parallaxes, both taken from the HIPPARCOS catalogue (ESA 1997), were com- Fig. 1. Chromospheric activity indicator log(RHK) as a function of bined to yield the absolute visual magnitude (Mv). Bolometric the planetary semi-major axis log(1/apl) for our sample of stars correction (BC), computed from Flower (1996) calibration, was with planets. applied to obtaining the bolometric magnitude, which was fi- nally converted into stellar luminosity. The effective temperature was computed using Flower (1996)(B − V)versusTeff calibra- Following the same strategy as used by Poppenhaeger et al. tion. The stellar and planetary parameters, as well as chromo- (2010) in their analysis of the coronal X-ray emission behav- spheric and coronal activity indicators for the entire sample of ior in stars with planets, we show the distribution of the chro- stars with planets, are listed in Table 1. mospheric activity indicator log(RHK) of stars with planets as a For comparative purposes, we took a sample of stars not function of planetary distance log(1/apl)(Fig.1). A close com- known to have any planetary-mass companions. This new parison of the distribution of log(RHK)versuslog(1/apl) with sample was taken from Schmitt et al. (1997), as done by the distribution of the coronal activity indicator log( LX )versus Poppenhaeger et al. (2010), and is composed of 26 F-G-K type Lbol log(1/a ), illustrated in Fig. 5 of Poppenhaeger et al. (2010), dwarf stars with all stars having Ca II emission flux measured pl shows that, at least qualitatively, the behavior of the chromo- by Wright et al. (2004) and X-ray fluxes detected by Schmitt spheric activity indicator appears to be comparable to that of the (1997). The chromospheric and coronal activity indicators were coronal activity indicator. The same aspect can be seen in Fig. 2 calculated as before for the sample of stars with planets. where we show the distribution of the chromospheric activity in- However, we should be cautious about this sample, which de- dicator log(R ) of stars with planets as a function of the product rives from a list of stars that are surveyed for planets, but for HK of the planetary mass with the reciprocal distance log(1/a ). which none have yet been found. This certainly does not mean pl Still following the strategy proposed by Poppenhaeger et al. that such stars have no planetary companions whatsoever. In fact, (2010), we also carried out a statistical analysis of both log(R ) they might host planets with very low mass and/or a long orbital HK ffi and log( LX ) activity indicators of stars with close-in planets, period that are more di cult to detect with radial velocity sur- Lbol veys.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423537 & C ESO 2014 Astrophysics
    A&A 565, A124 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423537 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Carbon monoxide and water vapor in the atmosphere of the non-transiting exoplanet HD 179949 b? M. Brogi1, R. J. de Kok1;2, J. L. Birkby1, H. Schwarz1, and I. A. G. Snellen1 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 29 January 2014 / Accepted 5 April 2014 ABSTRACT Context. In recent years, ground-based high-resolution spectroscopy has become a powerful tool for investigating exoplanet atmo- spheres. It allows the robust identification of molecular species, and it can be applied to both transiting and non-transiting planets. Radial-velocity measurements of the star HD 179949 indicate the presence of a giant planet companion in a close-in orbit. The system is bright enough to be an ideal target for near-infrared, high-resolution spectroscopy. Aims. Here we present the analysis of spectra of the system at 2.3 µm, obtained at a resolution of R ∼ 100 000, during three nights of observations with CRIRES at the VLT. We targeted the system while the exoplanet was near superior conjunction, aiming to detect the planet’s thermal spectrum and the radial component of its orbital velocity. Methods. Unlike the telluric signal, the planet signal is subject to a changing Doppler shift during the observations. This is due to the changing radial component of the planet orbital velocity, which is on the order of 100–150 km s−1 for these hot Jupiters.
    [Show full text]
  • “Spectra and Photometry: Windows Into Exoplanet Atmospheres”
    “Spectra and Photometry: Windows into Exoplanet Atmospheres” A. Burrows Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences Princeton University Transiting Planets Secondary Eclipse See thermal radiation and reflected light from planet disappear and reappear Transit Orbital Phase Variations See stellar flux decrease See cyclical variations in (function of wavelength) brightness of planet figure taken from H. Knutson! With upper- atmosphere optical absorber! Transit chord Graphics by D. Spiegel! Haze on HD 189733b Figure from Pont, Knutson et al. (2007) showing atmospheric transmission function derived from HST ACS measurements between 600-1000 nm Pont et al .2013: Haze on HD 189733b Pont et al. 2013 GJ 1214b: Transit Radius vs. Wavelength! Howe & Burrows 2012, in press HST GJ1214b transit spectrum – Kreidberg et al. 2014 Hazes! Figure 2: The transmission spectrum of GJ1214b. a,Transmissionspectrummeasurements from our data (black points) and previous work (gray points)7–11,comparedtotheoreticalmodels (lines). The error bars correspond to 1 σ uncertainties. Each data set is plotted relative to its mean. Our measurements are consistent with past results for GJ1214usingWFC310.Previousdatarule out a cloud-free solar composition (orange line), but are consistent with a high-mean molecular weight atmosphere (e.g. 100% water, blue line) or a hydrogen-rich atmosphere with high-altitude clouds. b,Detailviewofourmeasuredtransmissionspectrum(blackpoints) compared to high mean molecular weight models (lines). The error bars are 1 σ uncertainties in the posterior distri- bution from a Markov chain Monte Carlo fit to the light curves (see the Supplemental Information for details of the fits). The colored points correspond to the models binned at the resolution of the observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets
    Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets1 R. P. Butler2, J. T. Wright3, G. W. Marcy3,4, D. A Fischer3,4, S. S. Vogt5, C. G. Tinney6, H. R. A. Jones7, B. D. Carter8, J. A. Johnson3, C. McCarthy2,4, A. J. Penny9,10 ABSTRACT We present a catalog of nearby exoplanets. It contains the 172 known low- mass companions with orbits established through radial velocity and transit mea- surements around stars within 200 pc. We include 5 previously unpublished exo- planets orbiting the stars HD 11964, HD 66428, HD 99109, HD 107148, and HD 164922. We update orbits for 90 additional exoplanets including many whose orbits have not been revised since their announcement, and include radial ve- locity time series from the Lick, Keck, and Anglo-Australian Observatory planet searches. Both these new and previously published velocities are more precise here due to improvements in our data reduction pipeline, which we applied to archival spectra. We present a brief summary of the global properties of the known exoplanets, including their distributions of orbital semimajor axis, mini- mum mass, and orbital eccentricity. Subject headings: catalogs — stars: exoplanets — techniques: radial velocities 1Based on observations obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated jointly by the Uni- versity of California and the California Institute of Technology. The Keck Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. arXiv:astro-ph/0607493v1 21 Jul 2006 2Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015-1305 3Department of Astronomy, 601 Campbell Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132 5UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 6Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 562, A92 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321493 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Li depletion in solar analogues with exoplanets Extending the sample, E. Delgado Mena1,G.Israelian2,3, J. I. González Hernández2,3,S.G.Sousa1,2,4, A. Mortier1,4,N.C.Santos1,4, V. Zh. Adibekyan1, J. Fernandes5, R. Rebolo2,3,6,S.Udry7, and M. Mayor7 1 Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/ Via Lactea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 5 CGUC, Department of Mathematics and Astronomical Observatory, University of Coimbra, 3049 Coimbra, Portugal 6 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, Spain 7 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland Received 18 March 2013 / Accepted 25 November 2013 ABSTRACT Aims. We want to study the effects of the formation of planets and planetary systems on the atmospheric Li abundance of planet host stars. Methods. In this work we present new determinations of lithium abundances for 326 main sequence stars with and without planets in the Teff range 5600–5900 K. The 277 stars come from the HARPS sample, the remaining targets were observed with a variety of high-resolution spectrographs. Results. We confirm significant differences in the Li distribution of solar twins (Teff = T ± 80 K, log g = log g ± 0.2and[Fe/H] = [Fe/H] ±0.2): the full sample of planet host stars (22) shows Li average values lower than “single” stars with no detected planets (60).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Astrophysics in 2006 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5760h9v8 Journal Space Science Reviews, 132(1) ISSN 0038-6308 Authors Trimble, V Aschwanden, MJ Hansen, CJ Publication Date 2007-09-01 DOI 10.1007/s11214-007-9224-0 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Space Sci Rev (2007) 132: 1–182 DOI 10.1007/s11214-007-9224-0 Astrophysics in 2006 Virginia Trimble · Markus J. Aschwanden · Carl J. Hansen Received: 11 May 2007 / Accepted: 24 May 2007 / Published online: 23 October 2007 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The fastest pulsar and the slowest nova; the oldest galaxies and the youngest stars; the weirdest life forms and the commonest dwarfs; the highest energy particles and the lowest energy photons. These were some of the extremes of Astrophysics 2006. We attempt also to bring you updates on things of which there is currently only one (habitable planets, the Sun, and the Universe) and others of which there are always many, like meteors and molecules, black holes and binaries. Keywords Cosmology: general · Galaxies: general · ISM: general · Stars: general · Sun: general · Planets and satellites: general · Astrobiology · Star clusters · Binary stars · Clusters of galaxies · Gamma-ray bursts · Milky Way · Earth · Active galaxies · Supernovae 1 Introduction Astrophysics in 2006 modifies a long tradition by moving to a new journal, which you hold in your (real or virtual) hands. The fifteen previous articles in the series are referenced oc- casionally as Ap91 to Ap05 below and appeared in volumes 104–118 of Publications of V.
    [Show full text]
  • Song Pack Listing
    TRACK LISTING BY TITLE Packs 1-86 Kwizoke Karaoke listings available - tel: 01204 387410 - Title Artist Number "F" You` Lily Allen 66260 'S Wonderful Diana Krall 65083 0 Interest` Jason Mraz 13920 1 2 Step Ciara Ft Missy Elliot. 63899 1000 Miles From Nowhere` Dwight Yoakam 65663 1234 Plain White T's 66239 15 Step Radiohead 65473 18 Til I Die` Bryan Adams 64013 19 Something` Mark Willis 14327 1973` James Blunt 65436 1985` Bowling For Soup 14226 20 Flight Rock Various Artists 66108 21 Guns Green Day 66148 2468 Motorway Tom Robinson 65710 25 Minutes` Michael Learns To Rock 66643 4 In The Morning` Gwen Stefani 65429 455 Rocket Kathy Mattea 66292 4Ever` The Veronicas 64132 5 Colours In Her Hair` Mcfly 13868 505 Arctic Monkeys 65336 7 Things` Miley Cirus [Hannah Montana] 65965 96 Quite Bitter Beings` Cky [Camp Kill Yourself] 13724 A Beautiful Lie` 30 Seconds To Mars 65535 A Bell Will Ring Oasis 64043 A Better Place To Be` Harry Chapin 12417 A Big Hunk O' Love Elvis Presley 2551 A Boy From Nowhere` Tom Jones 12737 A Boy Named Sue Johnny Cash 4633 A Certain Smile Johnny Mathis 6401 A Daisy A Day Judd Strunk 65794 A Day In The Life Beatles 1882 A Design For Life` Manic Street Preachers 4493 A Different Beat` Boyzone 4867 A Different Corner George Michael 2326 A Drop In The Ocean Ron Pope 65655 A Fairytale Of New York` Pogues & Kirsty Mccoll 5860 A Favor House Coheed And Cambria 64258 A Foggy Day In London Town Michael Buble 63921 A Fool Such As I Elvis Presley 1053 A Gentleman's Excuse Me Fish 2838 A Girl Like You Edwyn Collins 2349 A Girl Like
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0809.1275V2
    How eccentric orbital solutions can hide planetary systems in 2:1 resonant orbits Guillem Anglada-Escud´e1, Mercedes L´opez-Morales1,2, John E. Chambers1 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The Doppler technique measures the reflex radial motion of a star induced by the presence of companions and is the most successful method to detect ex- oplanets. If several planets are present, their signals will appear combined in the radial motion of the star, leading to potential misinterpretations of the data. Specifically, two planets in 2:1 resonant orbits can mimic the signal of a sin- gle planet in an eccentric orbit. We quantify the implications of this statistical degeneracy for a representative sample of the reported single exoplanets with available datasets, finding that 1) around 35% percent of the published eccentric one-planet solutions are statistically indistinguishible from planetary systems in 2:1 orbital resonance, 2) another 40% cannot be statistically distinguished from a circular orbital solution and 3) planets with masses comparable to Earth could be hidden in known orbital solutions of eccentric super-Earths and Neptune mass planets. Subject headings: Exoplanets – Orbital dynamics – Planet detection – Doppler method arXiv:0809.1275v2 [astro-ph] 25 Nov 2009 Introduction Most of the +300 exoplanets found to date have been discovered using the Doppler tech- nique, which measures the reflex motion of the host star induced by the planets (Mayor & Queloz 1995; Marcy & Butler 1996). The diverse characteristics of these exoplanets are somewhat surprising. Many of them are similar in mass to Jupiter, but orbit much closer to their 1Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Today in Astronomy 106: Exoplanets
    Today in Astronomy 106: exoplanets The successful search for extrasolar planets Prospects for determining the fraction of stars with planets, and the number of habitable planets per planetary system (fp and ne). T. Pyle, SSC/JPL/Caltech/NASA. 26 May 2011 Astronomy 106, Summer 2011 1 Observing exoplanets Stars are vastly brighter and more massive than planets, and most stars are far enough away that the planets are lost in the glare. So astronomers have had to be more clever and employ the motion of the orbiting planet. The methods they use (exoplanets detected thereby): Astrometry (0): tiny wobble in star’s motion across the sky. Radial velocity (399): tiny wobble in star’s motion along the line of sight by Doppler shift. Timing (9): tiny delay or advance in arrival of pulses from regularly-pulsating stars. Gravitational microlensing (10): brightening of very distant star as it passes behind a planet. 26 May 2011 Astronomy 106, Summer 2011 2 Observing exoplanets (continued) Transits (69): periodic eclipsing of star by planet, or vice versa. Very small effect, about like that of a bug flying in front of the headlight of a car 10 miles away. Imaging (11 but 6 are most likely to be faint stars): taking a picture of the planet, usually by blotting out the star. Of these by far the most useful so far has been the combination of radial-velocity and transit detection. Astrometry and gravitational microlensing of sufficient precision to detect lots of planets would need dedicated, specialized observatories in space. Imaging lots of planets will require 30-meter-diameter telescopes for visible and infrared wavelengths.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]