DOCSLIB.ORG

Hole-In-The-Rock Foundation Trekking SRP EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hole-In-The-Rock Foundation Trekking SRP EA United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2012-0001 December 2015 Hole-in-the-Rock Foundation Trekking SRP Location: Salvation Knoll Route T. 37 S., R. 18 E., Sections 10, 11, 13 & 14 T. 37 S., R. 19 W., Section 16 and Protraction Blocks 49, 50, 51, 53, 54 & 55 Long Flat Route T. 38 S., R. 18 E., Sections 11, 12 & 13 T. 38 S., R. 19 E., Section 32 and Protraction Blocks 50, 51, 60 & 61 San Juan Hill Route T. 40 S., R. 20 E., Sections 35 & 36 T. 41 S., R. 20 E., Sections 2, 10, 11 & 15 Applicant/Address: Hole-in-the-Rock Foundation PO Box 476 Bluff, UT 84512 Monticello Field Office P.O. Box 7 Monticello, UT 84535 Phone: (435) 587-1500 Fax: (435) 587-1518 Hole-in-the-Rock Foundation Trekking SRP DOI-BLM-UT-Y020-2012-0001 Table of Contents Page 1.0 PURPOSE and NEED…………………………………………………………………………..……...1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Need for the Proposed Action ................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Purpose(s) of the Proposed Action............................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Conformance with BLM Land Use Plan(s) .............................................................................................. 3 1.6 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, or other Plans ............................................................................... 5 1.7 Identification of Issues .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.8 Issues Considered, but Eliminated from Further Analysis ........................................................................ 8 1.9 Summary of EA Organization................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING PROPOSED ACTION ............................... 9 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... .9 2.2 Alternative A – Proposed Action .............................................................................................................. .9 2.3 Alternative B – Hole-in-the-Rock Foundation Revisions ......................................................................... 12 2.4 Alternative C – Reduction of Group Size in Comb Wash RMZ ............................................................... 13 2.5 Alternative D – Reduce Recreation Conflict through Restrictions on Season of Use .............................. 14 2.6 Alternative E – Reduce Recreation Conflict through Restrictions on Number of Trips ........................... 14 2.7 Alternative F – No Action Alternative ...................................................................................................... 15 2.8 Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Further Analysis .............................................................. 15 2.9 Summary Comparison of Environmental Impacts .................................................................................... 15 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................. 16 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 General Setting .......................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Resources Brought Forward for Analysis ................................................................................................. 16 3.3.1 ACECs ................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3.3 Recreation/RMZ .................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.3.4.1 Raptors/Migratory Birds ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.4.2 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species ............................................................................... 21 3.3.4.3 Wildlife (Crucial Mule Deer Habitat) ................................................................................................ 22 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ........................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Direct & Indirect Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 24 4.3.1 Alternative A - Proposed Action ............................................................................................................ 24 4.3.1.1 ACECs ................................................................................................................................... 24 4.3.1.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 26 4.3.1.3 Recreation and the RMZ ....................................................................................................... 27 4.3.1.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 30 4.3.1.4.1 Raptors/Migratory Birds ........................................................................................ 30 4.3.1.4.2 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species .................................................. 32 4.3.1.4.3 Wildlife (Crucial Mule Deer Habitat) .................................................................... 33 4.3.1.7 Monitoring and/or Compliance ......................................................................................................... 33 4.4.1 Alternative B – Hole-in-the-Rock Foundation Modifications ............................................................... 34 4.4.1.1 ACECs ................................................................................................................................... 33 4.4.1.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 34 4.4.1.3 Recreation and the RMZ ....................................................................................................... 34 4.4.1.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 35 4.5.1 Alternative C – Reduction of Group Size in Comb Wash RMZ ........................................................... 35 4.5.1.1 ACECs ................................................................................................................................... 35 4.5.1.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 36 4.5.1.3 Recreation/RMZ ................................................................................................................... 36 4.5.1.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 37 4.6.1 Alternative D – Reduce Recreation Conflict through Restrictions on Season of Use ........................... 37 4.6.1.1 ACECs ................................................................................................................................... 37 4.6.1.2 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 38 4.6.1.3 Recreation and the RMZ ........................................................................................................ 38 4.6.1.4 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................. 38 4.6.1.4.1Raptors/Migratory Birds ......................................................................................... 39 4.6.1.4.2 Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species .................................................. 39 4.6.1.4.3Wildlife (Crucial Mule Deer Habitat) ..................................................................... 39 4.7.1 Alternative E – Reduce Recreation Conflict through Restrictions on Number of Trips ........................ 39 4.7.1.1 ACECs ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEATURE TYPES Revised 2/2001 Alcove
    THE CROW CANYON ARCHAEOLOGICAL CENTER FEATURE TYPES Revised 2/2001 alcove. A small auxiliary chamber in a wall, usually found in pit structures; they often adjoin the east wall of the main chamber and are substantially larger than apertures and niches. aperture. A generic term for a wall opening that cannot be defined more specifically. architectural petroglyph (not on bedrock). A petroglyph in a standing masonry wall.A piece of wall fall with a petroglyph on it should be sent in as an artifact if size permits. ashpit. A pit used primarily as a receptacle for ash removed from a hearth or firepit. In a pit structure, the ash pit is commonly oval or rectangular and is located south of the hearth or firepit. bedrock feature. A feature constructed into bedrock that does not fit any of the other feature types listed here. bell-shaped cist. A large pit whose greatest diameter is substantially larger than the diameter of its opening.A storage function is implied, but the feature may not contain any stored materials, in which case the shape of the pit is sufficient for assigning this feature type. bench surface. The surface of a wide ledge in a pit structure or kiva that usually extends around at least three-fourths of the circumference of the structure and is often divided by pilasters.The southern recess surface is also considered a bench surface segment; each bench surface segment must be recorded as a separate feature. bin: not further specified. An above-ground compartment formed by walling off a portion of a structure or courtyard other than a corner.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report: Grand Staircase-Escalante National
    CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scoping Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Purpose of Scoping ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Scoping Outreach .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Publication of the Notice of Intent ....................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Other Outreach Methods ....................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Opportunities for Public Comment ................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Public Scoping Meetings .................................................................................................................. 4 2.5 Cooperating Agency Involvement ................................................................................................... 4 2.6 National Historic Preservation Act and Tribal Consultation ....................................................... 5 3 Submission Processing and Comment Coding .................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS: SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS AND ADAPTATIONS edited by Yvonne R. Oakes and Dorothy A. Zamora VOLUME 6. SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS Yvonne R. Oakes Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 232 SANTA FE 1999 NEW MEXICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures............................................................................iii Tables............................................................................. iv VOLUME 6. SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION IN MOGOLLON STRUCTURES .......................... 1 Structural Variation through Time ................................................ 1 Communal Structures......................................................... 19 CHANGING SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS ................ 27 Research Orientation .......................................................... 27 Methodology ................................................................ 27 Examination of Settlement Patterns .............................................. 29 Population Movements ........................................................ 35 Conclusions................................................................. 41 REGIONAL ABANDONMENT PROCESSES IN THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS ............ 43 Background for Studying Abandonment Processes .................................. 43 Causes of Regional Abandonment ............................................... 44 Abandonment Patterns in the Mogollon Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • Native Sons and Daughters Program Manual
    NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS PROGRAMS® PROGRAM MANUAL National Longhouse, Ltd. National Longhouse, Ltd. 4141 Rockside Road Suite 150 Independence, OH 44131-2594 Copyright © 2007, 2014 National Longhouse, Ltd. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this manual may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, xerography, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of National Longhouse, Ltd. Printed in the United States of America EDITORS: Edition 1 - Barry Yamaji National Longhouse, Native Sons And Daughters Programs, Native Dads And Sons, Native Moms And Sons, Native Moms And Daughters are registered trademarks of National Longhouse, Ltd. Native Dads And Daughters, Native Sons And Daughters, NS&D Pathfinders are servicemarks of National Longhouse TABLE of CONTENTS FOREWORD xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Why NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 2 What Are NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 4 Program Format History 4 Program Overview 10 CHAPTER 2: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES 15 Organizational Levels 16 Administrative Levels 17 National Longhouse, Ltd. 18 Regional Advisory Lodge 21 Local Longhouse 22 Nations 24 Tribes 25 CHAPTER 3: THE TRIBE 29 Preparing for a Tribe Meeting 30 Tribe Meetings 32 iii Table of Contents A Sample Tribe Meeting Procedure 34 Sample Closing Prayers 36 Tips for a Successful Meeting 37 The Parents' Meeting 38 CHAPTER 4: AWARDS, PATCHES, PROGRAM
    [Show full text]
  • Lockdown in Lincoln, Part II
    Lockdown in Lincoln, Part II Safety and Security in La Placita Social Studies Lesson Plan Grades 4, 5 & 7 NM Standards: Strand: History • I-A – Describe how contemporary and SWBATD comprehension of the purpose of the historical people and historic Lincoln torreon by explaining how it served as events influenced NM a defensive structure. communities and regions. • I-A1.- Identify Materials: important issues, ! computer with PowerPoint presentation events and ! projector individuals from New ! white board or screen Mexico pre-history to the present. Day 2~ Anticipatory Set: Strand: Geography: • II-A – Describe how Questions: contemporary and • “Did anyone’s house get invaded by aliens last historical people and night? If your house had been invaded by aliens, events influenced where would you have gone? New Mexico Now imagine you didn’t have a house, in fact, there • communities and were no houses or buildings around. Did you see regions. any natural features in your environment where II-E – Describe how you could have hidden from the aliens?” • economic, political, cultural and social Discussion: processes interact to shape patterns of ! Ask “if aliens did suddenly show up, what might we human populations speculate brought them here?” (Our planet’s and their resources such as water, food, minerals.) interdependence, ! Discuss how we might feel about these creatures cooperation and coming into our world and the fear that they might conflict. take the things that we need to survive. ! Explain how it is a human instinct to want to protect our basic survival necessities. Sometimes a culture will invade another culture to acquire things that aren’t necessities, such as gold or other precious metals.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Location of Legal Description
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_____________. 1. Name historic Ensign-Smith House and/or common Silas Smith House 2. Location street & number 96 Main not for publication city, town Paragonah vicinity of state Utah code 049 county Iron code 021 3. Classification Category Ownership States Present Use _ ^district _kloccupied agriculture museum _ _ building(s) _i^lprivate unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational Lf^private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process V yes: restricted government scientific _ L being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation n no military other: 4. Owner of Property name R. J. Reynolds street & number Box 384 city, town Palm Springs vicinity of state CA 92263 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Iron County Courthouse street & number city, town Parowan state Utah 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Utah Historic Sites Survey/ title Iron County Survey______ has this property been determined elegible? yes no date SP rin 9 1981 federal X state county local depository for survey records Utah State Historical Society city, town Lake Ci state Utah 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent ^,__ deteriorated .. unaltered X original site _A_ goodC* » -- l<-_ ruins ^ altered __ moved date __ fair __ unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The En sign -Smith house in Paragonah is a long (the front section measures about 50' x 17') 1-1/2 story adobe house.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at the Green Lizard Site, Pp. 69-77
    Excavations at the Green Liza_rd Site . Edgar K. Huber and William D. Lipe Introduction than Sand Canyon Pueblo, or was abandoned before the end of occupation at the larger site, does comparison of he Green Lizard site (5MT3901) is a small, Pueblo III artifacts and ecofacts from the two sites provide evidence T habitation site located in the middle reaches of Sand that may help us understand the shift from a dispersed to Canyon, approximately 1 km down canyon from Sand an aggregated settlement pattern and/or the eventual aban­ Canyon Pueblo (Figure 1.3). In the summers of 1987 and donment of the Sand Canyon locality? 1988, intensive excavation was carried out in the western In planning for the Green Lizard excavations, we de­ half of the site. A kiva, an adjacent masonry· roomblock, cided to excavate a full kiva suite (kiva and associated and the floors of several jacal structures were excavated; surface rooms) to obtain a data set fully comparable to those the midden lying to the south of these features was sampled being produced by the intensive excavations of kiva suites with test pits (Figure 6~ 1). at Sand Canyon Pueblo (Bradley, this volume; see also The Green Lizard site Was first recorded by Craw Adams 1985a; Bradley 1986, 1987, 1988a, 1990; Kleidon Canyon Center researchers in 1984 (Adams 1985a). The and Bradley 1989). layout of the site is essentially two adjacent Prudden units (Prudden 1903, 1914, 1918). It consists of two kivas, Environmental Setting approximately 20 more or less contiguous, masonry-walled surface rooms, and an extensive and reJatively deep midden The Green Lizard site is located within Sand Canyon on a deposit located to the south of the structures (Figure 6.1).
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1. Name
    NFS Form 10-900 (3-82) 0MB Wo. 1024-0018 Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NFS use only National Register of Historic Places received AUG I I Inventory Nomination Form date entered [ri <5( See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections__________________________ 1. Name ________________________ historic The Historic Resources of Victoria, Texas (Partial Inventory of Architectural and Historic Properties) and or common____________________•__________________________ 2. Location street & number The 1985 city limits of Victoria, Texas N/A not for publication city, town Victoria N/A vicinity of state Texas code 048 county Victoria code 469 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public x occupied agriculture x museum building(s) private x unoccupied x commercial x park structure x both X work in progress x educational x private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment x religious object N/A in process N/A yes: restricted x government scientific being considered .. yes: unrestricted __ industrial x transportation multiple properties __ "no military x other: vacant 4. Owner off Property name See individual site forms street & number N/A city, town N/A I/A vicinity of state N/A 5. Location off Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Victoria County Courthouse street & number 101 North Bridge Street city, town Victoria state Texas 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title Texas Historic Sites Inventory has this property been determined eligible? N/A yes z_ no date March 1983 - June 1984 federal x state county local depository for survey records Texas Historical Commission, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES A DATA RECOVERY PLAN FOR LA 9075, ALONG NM 53, CIBOLA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Stephen C. Lentz Submitted by Yvonne R. Oakes Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 270 SANTA FE 2000 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Site Stabilization and Preservation Project (ASSAPP), Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted a site evaluation of LA 9075 (the La Vega site), a large multicomponent site along NM 53 in Cibola County, New Mexico, on private lands and highway right-of-way. The New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) proposes to stabilize areas within the boundaries of the site and within the NMSHTD right-of-way that have been or may be affected by erosion. The Office of Archaeological Studies has been working under contract with the NMSHTD to identify endangered archaeological sites within highway rights-of-way. Subsequent to shoulder construction and improvement by the NMSHTD, additional cultural resources were exposed within the Museum’s project area. The OAS/ASSAPP program identified five major areas within the highway right-of-way at LA 9075 where cultural resources are threatened by erosion. These areas have been targeted for stabilization. In conjunction with the NMSHTD, District 6, the OAS proposes to conduct a data recovery program on the affected areas prior to stabilization efforts. NMSHTD Project No. TPE-7700 (14), CN 9163 MNM Project No. 41.596 (Archaeological Site Stabilization and Protection Project) Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers Agreement J0089-95 between the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department and the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Boom and Bust 243
    Mines and Roads OF BOOMAND BUST Gold. Nothing made the hearts of many nineteenth-century Americans beat faster than the possibility of finding it and becoming independently wealthy overnight. Stories of feverish activity abound from the placer claims of California to the Comstock Lode in Nevada, and from Cripple Creek and Leadville in Colorado to the Black Hills of South Dakota. The reward for most of the large num- ber of people who flooded to these areas were claims that did not pan out, debts that remained for years, and an experience that was better left forgotten. When the boom went bust there was little reason to remain, and so the miners packed their essentials and left for the next strike, where conditions would undoubtedly be better. San Juan County has seen its own rushes-first for silver and gold, then oil, and finally uranium-each with its own get-rich-quick pattern, ebb and flow of men and machines, and frenzied quest for wealth. Strikes have occurred all around the county, in the Carrizo, Henry, Sleeping Ute, and La Sal mountains. Even before the area became a county, there were miners on the prowl, trying to find that Eldorado that was going to make them rich. Earliest mining attempts involved individuals or small groups of prospectors searching in a rugged country where few had previously ventured. Ernest Mitchell and James Merrick invited George Hobbs of the 1879 Mormon exploring party to join them in search of a secret Navajo silver mine whose ore reportedly assayed at ninety per- cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Staircase-Escalante National‘ Monument Annual Manager’S Report—Fiscal Year 2016 Table of Contents
    Utah Grand Staircase-Escalante National‘ Monument Annual Manager’s Report—Fiscal Year 2016 Table of Contents Grand Staircase-Escalante Profile ..................................................................................... 2 Planning and NEPA ............................................................................................................. 6 2016 Projects and Accomplishments ................................................................................ 9 Science .............................................................................................................................. 35 Resources, Objects, Values, and Stressors ..................................................................... 57 Summary of Performance Measure ................................................................................. 84 Manager’s Letter ............................................................................................................... 88 1 1 Grand Staircase-Escalante Profile Designating Authority Designating Authority: Presidential Proclamation 6920 Date of Designation: September 18, 1996 Acreage Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) spans nearly 1.9 million acres of America’s public lands. Managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), GSENM is part of the National Conservation Lands. Reporting directly to the BLM Utah State Office, the Monument Manager oversees public lands which contain some of America’s most scientifically exciting and visually stunning landscapes. The Monument boundary encompasses
    [Show full text]