Goodbye Prince by Michael Khodarkovsky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Goodbye Prince by Michael Khodarkovsky Grandmaster Leonid Alexandrovich Shamkovich (1923-2005) Goodbye Prince by Michael Khodarkovsky t was just a few months ago that we der Alekhine, not Ispoke on the phone, and Leonid was to play in the Gru- still optimistic and passionate about enfeld Defense on his analytical work, saying that he was move seven, (Nf3) continuing to analyze recently played in order to avoid games and following all theoretical being pinned by innovations being played by the top Bg4. It was Sham- players in the world. Less than a year kovich who radi- ago he was inducted into the Chess cally changed the Hall of Fame, and he was very pleased direction of this to know that his achievements as a theory by recom- player and theoretician were appreci- mending and em- ated by the chess community. ploying 7 Nf3 and He came to the United States in 1976 8 Rb1. Since then, by way of Israel, emigrating from the this system’s pop- former Soviet Union because he “could ularity has grown not tolerate the anti-Semitism in the as the best play- GM Shamkovich at home, 2005. Soviet Union anymore.” At 51, when he ers in the world, Photo by Fedor Khrapatin decided to emigrate to Israel, many of including Garry Kasparov, successfully conveyed to me his great displeasure his colleagues were surprised that he utilize this strategy in games to this with the title. Leonid wanted his made such a bold decision. Many of day. Leonid’s tireless analytical work games and his analysis to be remem- them preferred to find a warm place inspired many young players. bered as ones made by an artist and in collaboration with Soviet authori- lover of chess, and not associated with ties in order to receive comparatively A REAL ARTIST the word “terrorist.” Those who knew decent pension plans. Garry Kasparov recalls being only 9 Leonid simply could not associate him years old when he was enormously with that word. He was a most good- ANOTHER PATH impressed by a debate between Leonid But Leonid chose another path: He hearted, kind and soft-spoken man, and Alexander Nikitin. He writes, who was named by his colleagues and emigrated and continued playing “how poor the state of chess would be friends “The Prince” because of his chess, writing theoretical articles and if the real artist, like Shamkovich, did politeness and good manners, like the books, and enriching chess theory for not spend countless hours trying to aristocrats of the nineteenth century. the benefit of his contemporaries and connect the zenith of Tal’s genius with future generations. He left behind his the true essence of chess.” He was born on June 1, 1923 in the victories in the Russian Championship In all of his chess analysis, Shamko- city of Taganrog, in the southern part in 1954 and 1957, the Moscow Cham- vich was a maximalist, looking for new of Russia, to a Jewish family. His grand- pionship in 1963 and six participations approaches, methods and ideas, which father was a prominent doctor in this in the prestigious finals of the Soviet have always been related to complica- region and his father was a lawyer and Championships along with great grand- tions and risks. He appreciated games writer. His family was evacuated to the masters such as Mikhail Tal, Leonid that were filled with nontrivial combi- Republic of Georgia during WWII Stein, David Bronstein, Viktor Korch- nations, witty plans and sharp theoret- where he began to play chess, and noi, Efim Geller, and others. ical lines. When going over his own after WWII ended he attended Lenin- Despite others’ beliefs that he was games, Leonid was always critical of grad’s Polytechnical Institute, where over the hill, Leonid won the Israeli errors and missteps, which sometimes he studied theoretical physics. His championship in 1974 and the U.S. occurred. Being so critical of himself, love for chess completely turned him Open in 1976 and 1977, sharing first he was also critical but very objective toward pursuing a career as a profes- place in the latter with his former about the games of other players. Many sional chess player, and he ended up compatriot Anatoly Lein. He repre- of the books and articles he wrote con- dedicating his entire life to it, up until sented the United States in the 1979 tained deep, thorough analysis that he April 22, 2005. Interzonal and was a member of the did without the help of a computer Those most close to Leonid Shamko- U.S. team at the 1980 Olympiad. He chess database. Leonid was one of the vich pay their respects to him and say won many international tournaments, last chess knights, whose precision in “Goodbye Friend, Goodbye Maestro, but he was also known as a brilliant analysis could be compared with pow- Goodbye Prince.” theoretician, whose paradoxical in- erful computer engines of our time. ventions stunned his opponents and As an illustration of his artistry in fascinated colleagues and fans. Be- MASTERFUL CONTRIBUTIONS chess, I have selected two games, which cause of his creative mind and superb Leonid Shamkovich desired to be Leonid would have loved to present analytical skills, Leonid was invited by remembered for the masterful analyti- himself. One of them he contributed ex-World Champion Mikhail Tal (1965) cal and theoretical contributions he to my book, The Gruenfeld Defence, made to the game of chess. Many times and Grandmaster Leonid Stein (1972) Revealed and the other, he considered in our private conversations Shamko- to assist them in the role of a coach. one of the best of his career. Both vich relayed to me his hope of being Shamkovich has been considered games are enriched with Leonid’s remembered as an artist, whose work one of the leading theoreticians dur- own annotations. benefited the chess community, a com- ing his career. He used his knowledge munity he loved. One of his many GRUENFELD DEFENSE [D85] to fashion many new ideas. For in- books was The Chess Terrorist’s Hand- W: J. Fedorowicz stance, chess players for many years book, and on countless occasions he B : L. Shamkovich religiously followed advice of Alexan- New York, 1996 8 Chess Life—July 2005 480 1 d4 Nf6 2rsnlwqk+-tr is trying to limit the power of the Nxd4 Nf6 5r+-wqkvl-tr Nf3 g6 3 c4 fianchetto bishop, but Black has an Nc3 d6 6 g4 a6 Bg7 4 Nc3 d5 zpp+-zppvlp outstanding counter argument 15 … 7 g5 Nfd7 8+l+n+pzpp 5 cxd5 Nxd5 -+-+-+p+ g5! (previous Be3 b5 Black is psn-zp-+-+ 6 e4 Nxc3 7+-zp-+-+- diagram) 16 -+-trk+-tr planning 9 …+p+-zpPzP- bxc3 c5 8 Be3 -+-zPP+-+ Bh3 White, in zp-+-+ptRp Bb7 or 9 … b4, -+-sNP+-+ (diagram) +-zP-vLN+- his turn, pre- which is the An alternative pared to meet -+-+p+-+ most active con- zP-sN-vL-+- 8 Rb1, prevent- P+-+-zPPzP 16 … gxf4 with wq-zpPsn-+- tinuation. 9 a3 -zPP+-+-zP ing the bishop’s tR-+QmKL+R Bxd7+! Rxd7 18 -zpP+-zp-+ Nb6 10 Rg1 zP-+QmKLtR- development after 8 Be3 Bxf4. 16 … e6 +-+-vL-+L N8d7 11 f4 after 12 … e5 became more 17 Rg1 If 17 P+-wQ-zP-zP Bb7 12 f5 e5 popular in recent years, but Black has dxe6, then 17 … (diagram) sufficient resources for counterplay Nxe5. 17 … +-tR-mK-+- The text position back then consid- with 8 … 0-0 9 Be2 Qa5. 8 … Bg4!? gxf4 18 Rxg7 after 18 … Nxe5 ered as the only theoretical line based Shamkovich considered that this move Nxe5! (diagram) on the assumption of Black’s counter- gives Black better chances than 8 … “My opponent likely calculated the play after 13 Nb3 Rc8. But in this game 0-0, in view of the possibility like 9 Qd2 following line: 18 … fxe3 19 Qxe3 only, Shamkovich demonstrated an excep- Bg4 10 Rc1 Bxf3 and then for example, 19 … b3+ 20 Kf1 tionally brave and fantastic sacrifice. 11 gxf3 Nc6 12 rsn-+k+-tr b2 21 Re1 Qb4 22 dxe6! b1Q 23 Rxb1 Later, analyzing this game for his book h4! The text zpp+-zppvlp Qxb1+ 24 Kg2 Qb7+ 25 Kg3 with Sicilian: … e6 and … d6 systems Garry move is played -+-+-+p+ unclear game. But I surprised him Kasparov wrote: “This is beautiful and with the idea of with my last move. Now not only is the complicated.” 13 Ne6!! “This crude exchanging the wq-zp-+-+- knight a threatening fork on “f3”, but invasion of Black’s camp by the knight black bishop in -+-zPP+-+ rook on “d8” is doing its job as well, was familiar to me from other Sicilian order to intensi- +-zP-vLl+- thanks to move 13 … Rd8.” (L. Sham- systems. After some thought, I decided fy pressure on P+-wQ-zPPzP kovich) 19 Ke2? Correct was 19 Kf1, to pull the trigger now. I wasn’t sure White’s center. +-tR-mKL+R although after 19 … Qa3! 20 Bxf4 it was an origi- 9 Rc1 Qa5 10 Qxh3+ 21 Ke2 nal idea, but the r+-+q+-tr Qd2 Bxf3 after 10 … Bxf3 Qf3+ 22 Kf1 -+-+k+-tr surprised look (diagram) Qd3+! Black is zp-+-+ptRp on Benko’s face +l+-mk-vlP This is better better anyway. -+-+p+-+ suggested that it psn-zppsnP+ than 10 … 0-0 r+-+k+-tr The text move wq-zprsn-+- might be.” (L. +p+-zp-+Q 11 Ng5! with a zp-+nzppvlp allows Black to Shamkovich) 13 -+-+P+-+ better game for demonstrate an -zpP+-+-+ … fxe6 14 Qh5+ -+-+-+p+ +-+-zp-+L zP-+-vL-+- White, as was wqpzpP+-+- elegant but de- g6? Correct was played by Por- cisive tactical PwQ-+KzP-zP 14 … Ke7.
Recommended publications
  • An Interview with FIDE GM Mikhail Golubev by Santhosh Matthew Paul Copyright  2001 by Santhosh Matthew Paul, All Rights Reserved
    Correspondence Chess News Issue 31 - 14 January 2001 An Interview with FIDE GM Mikhail Golubev By Santhosh Matthew Paul Copyright 2001 by Santhosh Matthew Paul, All rights reserved. How did you first get attracted to chess? Please also say something about your early chess development in Ukraine. I started to play in 1976 (at the age of six) and from 1977 onwards, I started to learn chess in the chess club (by the way, many players the world over think that chess was an obligatory discipline in the regular Soviet Schools – that’s not correct). Sometimes, I think that I started to look at chess seriously after my parents got divorced, but I’m not sure if it was the real impetus. In any case, I was quite able to play chess. It is easy to say as I scored many good results, especially at the age of 12-14 years. For instance, in the 1984 (at age 14), I shared second place (with the better tiebreak) with Ivanchuk (he was one year older) in the Ukrainian Junior Ch U- 17. Still, I’m not sure if I’m a born chess player. I remember, in 1984 I played in a junior tournament in Baku, and shared the first place there with Vladimir Akopian. Volodya is one year younger than me, and he was very small in 1984 J . We played an extremely complicated game, and I accepted his draw offer when my position was already better. I was quite afraid for him, as for the first time I saw a clearly more talented player than me.
    [Show full text]
  • OCTOBER 25, 2013 – JULY 13, 2014 Object Labels
    OCTOBER 25, 2013 – JULY 13, 2014 Object Labels 1. Faux-gem Encrusted Cloisonné Enamel “Muslim Pattern” Chess Set Early to mid 20th century Enamel, metal, and glass Collection of the Family of Jacqueline Piatigorsky Though best known as a cellist, Jacqueline’s husband Gregor also earned attention for the beautiful collection of chess sets that he displayed at the Piatigorskys’ Los Angeles, California, home. The collection featured gorgeous sets from many of the locations where he traveled while performing as a musician. This beautiful set from the Piatigorskys’ collection features cloisonné decoration. Cloisonné is a technique of decorating metalwork in which metal bands are shaped into compartments which are then filled with enamel, and decorated with gems or glass. These green and red pieces are adorned with geometric and floral motifs. 2. Robert Cantwell “In Chess Piatigorsky Is Tops.” Sports Illustrated 25, No. 10 September 5, 1966 Magazine Published after the 1966 Piatigorsky Cup, this article celebrates the immense organizational efforts undertaken by Jacqueline Piatigorsky in supporting the competition and American chess. Robert Cantwell, the author of the piece, also details her lifelong passion for chess, which began with her learning the game from a nurse during her childhood. In the photograph accompanying the story, Jacqueline poses with the chess set collection that her husband Gregor Piatigorsky, a famous cellist, formed during his travels. 3. Introduction for Los Angeles Times 1966 Woman of the Year Award December 20, 1966 Manuscript For her efforts in organizing the 1966 Piatigorsky Cup, one of the strongest chess tournaments ever held on American soil, the Los Angeles Times awarded Jacqueline Piatigorsky their “Woman of the Year” award.
    [Show full text]
  • CHESS INFORMANT Contain
    Drawing by Bob Brandreth , The , E"..-y ail: mono. the Yuqoalav ChI .. Federation brings out a Dew book of the tin.. 1 gom.. plared dwinq the preceding baH y.ar. A unique. Dewly-deviled aystem of annotating gwu_ by coded ligna moida all languuge obetcd... 1'Ju. malt. possible a univeraally usable and yet V'Osonably-priced book which brings the neweat ideaa in the opening,; and throughout the game to every ch.. enthusiast more quickly U"m ever before. Book 6 confaina 821 gam.. played between July 1 and D.cember 31, 1968. A qreat aelectiOD of theoretically important gam_ from 28 toumcnrumta and match.. , inc1uding the Lugano Olympiad. World Student Team Cbmnpionsbip (Ybb.), Mar del Plata. Netanya, Amaterdam. Skopje, Debrecen, Sombot. Havana. Vinkovci, Belgrade, Palma d. Majorca, and Athens, S.pacial New Featurel Beginning with Book 6. each CHESS INFORMANT contain. a aection for FIDE communicati0D8, re­ placing the former official publication FIDE REVIEW. The FIDE section in this iau. contains comple'e Regu1ationa for the Toumamenta and Match BII for the Men'. and l.cdl·,' World CbampiC'Dlhipa. Pr.. crih n the entire competition .,atem from Zonal cmd Interzonal Toummnenta throuqb the Ccmdidatea Matches to the World Championship Match. Book 6 has aections leaturing 51 brilliant Combinations and 45 Endings from actual play during the preceding six months. Another interesting feature ia a table listing in Older the Ten Beat Gam,ea from Book 5 and showing how each of the eight Grandmastem on the jury voted. Contains an Engliah·lanquage introduction. esplanation of the annotation cod•• indez of play­ em and comm._tcrton.
    [Show full text]
  • 1967 U.S. Women's Champion
    1967 U.S. WOMEN'S CHAMPION Edith Lude Wear:!, lelt, pr.Hnllnq 11M cup .... hkh .hc donal~ In 1951. /9$1 U.s. Wornetn'. Champion Mrs. G/Hla Gro"er accept. lhe ClIp Im~kIfely followlno lhe toumomcml. S •• p. 190. ~ UNITED STATES ~ ._-- - - - --- -~ - ------ ---- -- -- . -- - - --~ -_. - Volume XXII Number 6 July, 1967 EDITOR: Burt Hochberg ------- --- --- --- -- CONTENTS Sarajevo 1967, by Dimitrije Bjelica .... ... ... ...... ... ...... .... ........... .............. 184 PRESIDENT Marshall Rohland Twa Games Fram Sara jevo, by Robert Byrne ... ... ......... ... ...... ................ 185 VICI·PRESIDENT Dutch Treat, by Bernard Zuckerman ............................ .... .................... 188 Isaac Kashdan REGIONAL VICE·PRESIDENTS Chess Life, Here and There, compiled by Wm. Go ichberg ......... ... 189. 203, 204, 207, 215 NEW ENCJLAND James Bolton Harold Dolldls Ell Buurdon Women's Chess, by Kothryn Slater ..... ......... ... ...... ............ .... ..... ............ 190 EASTERN Ii Obl'M LaBeU" Lewis E. Wood MIchael Raimo The College Column, by Mark L. Schwarcz ... ...... ...... ........................... 191 MID-ATLANTIC Earl Clary Steve Carruthers RObert Erk",. Observation Point, by Miro Rodojcic ... ...... .... ... ... .. ... ...... ... ... ............... 193 SOUTHERN Phlllp Lamb I-'w t H Lah.de Carroll M. Crull U. S. Open ... ..... ... ... ..... .. .. .. ........... .. ... ... .. ...................... ..... .................... 197 GREAT LAKES Donald W. Hlldlng Dr. Harvey M~ Clellan V. E. Vandenbur g Lorry Evans on Chess ...
    [Show full text]
  • YEARBOOK the Information in This Yearbook Is Substantially Correct and Current As of December 31, 2020
    OUR HERITAGE 2020 US CHESS YEARBOOK The information in this yearbook is substantially correct and current as of December 31, 2020. For further information check the US Chess website www.uschess.org. To notify US Chess of corrections or updates, please e-mail [email protected]. U.S. CHAMPIONS 2002 Larry Christiansen • 2003 Alexander Shabalov • 2005 Hakaru WESTERN OPEN BECAME THE U.S. OPEN Nakamura • 2006 Alexander Onischuk • 2007 Alexander Shabalov • 1845-57 Charles Stanley • 1857-71 Paul Morphy • 1871-90 George H. 1939 Reuben Fine • 1940 Reuben Fine • 1941 Reuben Fine • 1942 2008 Yury Shulman • 2009 Hikaru Nakamura • 2010 Gata Kamsky • Mackenzie • 1890-91 Jackson Showalter • 1891-94 Samuel Lipchutz • Herman Steiner, Dan Yanofsky • 1943 I.A. Horowitz • 1944 Samuel 2011 Gata Kamsky • 2012 Hikaru Nakamura • 2013 Gata Kamsky • 2014 1894 Jackson Showalter • 1894-95 Albert Hodges • 1895-97 Jackson Reshevsky • 1945 Anthony Santasiere • 1946 Herman Steiner • 1947 Gata Kamsky • 2015 Hikaru Nakamura • 2016 Fabiano Caruana • 2017 Showalter • 1897-06 Harry Nelson Pillsbury • 1906-09 Jackson Isaac Kashdan • 1948 Weaver W. Adams • 1949 Albert Sandrin Jr. • 1950 Wesley So • 2018 Samuel Shankland • 2019 Hikaru Nakamura Showalter • 1909-36 Frank J. Marshall • 1936 Samuel Reshevsky • Arthur Bisguier • 1951 Larry Evans • 1952 Larry Evans • 1953 Donald 1938 Samuel Reshevsky • 1940 Samuel Reshevsky • 1942 Samuel 2020 Wesley So Byrne • 1954 Larry Evans, Arturo Pomar • 1955 Nicolas Rossolimo • Reshevsky • 1944 Arnold Denker • 1946 Samuel Reshevsky • 1948 ONLINE: COVID-19 • OCTOBER 2020 1956 Arthur Bisguier, James Sherwin • 1957 • Robert Fischer, Arthur Herman Steiner • 1951 Larry Evans • 1952 Larry Evans • 1954 Arthur Bisguier • 1958 E.
    [Show full text]
  • “!Ya Es Suficiente¡ !Dejo El Ajedrez¡”
    Por el MN Ing. Orgel Bouza Quintero Batabanó, Cuba “!Ya es suficiente¡ !Dejo el ajedrez¡”. Que yo lo diga, no le preocupa tal vez ni a la propia Caissa, total, no se pierde un prodigio que digamos, pero estas palabras fueron pronunciadas en su momento, no sólo una, ¡sino 2 veces! por Leonid Zajarovich Stein, gran maestro soviético y uno de los mejores jugadores de su época. Esto sí seguro preocupó a la diosa por esa fecha, porque podía perder a uno de sus más queridos hijos y el mundo dejaría de disfrutar las espectaculares partidas que libró este gigante del tablero. Leonid Stein ha sido un poco olvidado, sobre todo del lado de acá del mundo, probablemente porque sus mayores éxitos deportivos los obtuvo dentro de la extinta URSS. Al recordar su fecha de nacimiento quise hacerle un pequeño homenaje a este formidable jugador, que nos dejó antes de tiempo y seguramente tenía mucho que hacer todavía en el tablero de las 64 casillas. Trataré de la más breve manera posible hacer un repaso de los momentos que más me llamaron la atención dentro de su carrera ajedrecística. Stein nace en Ucrania un 12 de Noviembre de 1934 y fallece un 4 de Julio de 1973, conoció el ajedrez a los 10 años y cautivó su interés desde el principio, fue admitido en el club de ajedrez del Palacio de los Pioneros de Lvov con 13 años pero su progreso fue lento, alcanzó la 1ra categoría 2 años más tarde, con 18 fue candidato a maestro y maestro con 24 años.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nemesis Efim Geller
    Chess Classics The Nemesis Geller’s Greatest Games By Efim Geller Quality Chess www.qualitychess.co.uk Contents Publisher’s Preface 7 Editor’s Note 8 Dogged Determination by Jacob Aagaard 9 Biographical Data & Key to symbols used 20 1 In search of adventure, Geller – Efim Kogan, Odessa 1946 21 2 Is a queen sacrifice always worth it? Samuel Kotlerman – Geller, Odessa 1949 25 3 A bishop transformed, Tigran Petrosian – Geller, Moscow 1949 29 4 Miniature monograph, Geller – Josif Vatnikov, Kiev 1950 31 5 Equilibrium disturbed, Mikhail Botvinnik – Geller, Moscow 1951 35 6 Blockading the flank, Mikhail Botvinnik – Geller, Budapest 1952 40 7 A step towards the truth, Geller – Wolfgang Unzicker, Stockholm 1952 44 8 The cost of a wasted move, Harry Golombek – Geller, Stockholm 1952 47 9 Insufficient compensation? Geller – Herman Pilnik, Stockholm 1952 49 10 Black needs a plan... Geller – Robert Wade, Stockholm 1952 51 11 White wants a draw, Luis Sanchez – Geller, Stockholm 1952 53 12 Sufferings for nothing, Geller – Gideon Stahlberg, Stockholm 1952 55 13 A strong queen, Geller – Gedeon Barcza, Stockholm 1952 58 14 The horrors of time trouble, Geller – Laszlo Szabo, Stockholm 1952 60 15 Seizing the moment, Geller – Paul Keres, Moscow 1952 62 16 Strength in movement, Geller – Miguel Najdorf, Zurich 1953 66 17 Second and last... Max Euwe – Geller, Zurich 1953 70 18 Whose weakness is weaker? Mikhail Botvinnik – Geller, Moscow 1955 74 19 All decided by tactics, Vasily Smyslov – Geller, Moscow (7) 1955 78 20 Three in one, Geller – Oscar Panno, Gothenburg
    [Show full text]
  • THE MATCH of the CENTURY USSR Vs. WORLD Th 50 Anniversary Edition
    Tigran Petrosian Aleksandar Matanović THE MATCH OF THE CENTURY USSR vs. WORLD th 50 Anniversary Edition Edited and revised by Douglas Griffin and Igor Žveglić Authors Tigran Petrosian Aleksandar Matanović Editorial board Vitomir Božić, Douglas Griffin, Branko Tadić, Igor Žveglić Design Miloš Majstorović Editing and Typesetting Katarina Tadić Editor-in-chief GM Branko Tadić General Manager Vitomir Božić President GM Aleksandar Matanović © Copyright 2020 Šahovski informator All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. No part of the Chess Informant system (classification of openings, endings and combinations, system of signs, etc.) may be used in other publications without prior permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 978-86-7297-108-8 Publisher Šahovski informator 11001 Beograd, Francuska 31, Srbija Phone: (381 11) 2630-109 E-mail: [email protected], Internet: https://www.sahovski.com Contents SYSTEM OF SIGNS [ 4 ] Foreword [ 5 ] Introduction: Half a century ago [ 9 ] Articles in The Soviet & Russian press [ 11 ] M. A. Beilin Carnations for Victory over the World Team - The Submerged Reefs of the ‘Match of the Century’ [ 11 ] A. B. Roshal Ahead – A Great Match [ 14 ] B. M. Kažić The Match of the Century, Day by Day [ 16 ] A. B. Roshal Against a Blue Background [ 23 ] Board-by-board – player profiles and
    [Show full text]
  • World Chess Hall of Fame Brochure
    ABOUT US THE HALL OF FAME The World Chess Hall of Fame Additionally, the World Chess Hall The World Chess Hall of Fame is home to both the World and U.S. Halls of Fame. (WCHOF) is a nonprofit, collecting of Fame offers interpretive programs Located on the third floor of the WCHOF, the Hall of Fame honors World and institution situated in the heart of that provide unique and exciting U.S. inductees with a plaque listing their contributions to the game of chess and Saint Louis. The WCHOF is the only ways to experience art, history, science, features rotating exhibitions from the permanent collection. The collection, institution of its kind and offers a and sport through chess. Since its including the Paul Morphy silver set, an early prototype of the Chess Challenger, variety of programming to explore inception, chess has challenged artists and Bobby Fischer memorabilia, is dedicated to the history of chess and the the dynamic relationship between and craftsmen to interpret the game accomplishments of the Hall of Fame inductees. As of May 2013, there are 19 art and chess, including educational through a variety of mediums resulting members of the World Hall of Fame and 52 members of the U.S. Hall of Fame. outreach initiatives that provide in chess sets of exceptional artistic context and meaning to the game skill and creativity. The WCHOF seeks and its continued cultural impact. to present the work of these craftsmen WORLD HALL OF FAME INDUCTEES and artists while educating visitors 2013 2008 2003 2001 Saint Louis has quickly become about the game itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Chess
    Glossary of chess See also: Glossary of chess problems, Index of chess • X articles and Outline of chess • This page explains commonly used terms in chess in al- • Z phabetical order. Some of these have their own pages, • References like fork and pin. For a list of unorthodox chess pieces, see Fairy chess piece; for a list of terms specific to chess problems, see Glossary of chess problems; for a list of chess-related games, see Chess variants. 1 A Contents : absolute pin A pin against the king is called absolute since the pinned piece cannot legally move (as mov- ing it would expose the king to check). Cf. relative • A pin. • B active 1. Describes a piece that controls a number of • C squares, or a piece that has a number of squares available for its next move. • D 2. An “active defense” is a defense employing threat(s) • E or counterattack(s). Antonym: passive. • F • G • H • I • J • K • L • M • N • O • P Envelope used for the adjournment of a match game Efim Geller • Q vs. Bent Larsen, Copenhagen 1966 • R adjournment Suspension of a chess game with the in- • S tention to finish it later. It was once very common in high-level competition, often occurring soon af- • T ter the first time control, but the practice has been • U abandoned due to the advent of computer analysis. See sealed move. • V adjudication Decision by a strong chess player (the ad- • W judicator) on the outcome of an unfinished game. 1 2 2 B This practice is now uncommon in over-the-board are often pawn moves; since pawns cannot move events, but does happen in online chess when one backwards to return to squares they have left, their player refuses to continue after an adjournment.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Chess in Saint Louis? Has Become Truly Global
    “Building Champions: In the Classroom and the Community” FIRST EDITION © 2018 Saint Louis Chess Campus April 12, 2018 – February 24, 2019 Complimentary The RESURGENCE of AMERICAN CHESS GATEWAY TO THE NEW CHESS WORLD BY GARRY KASPAROV Bowl for viewers. Legendary World Champion This April, the second floor of the same build- 2018 will be an eventful ing will host the U.S. Chess year in the chess world. This Championships for the 10th November, Magnus Carlsen, consecutive year. Nearly half the reigning world cham- the participants in the U.S. pion, will defend his crown Chess Championship will be against Fabiano Caruana, Saint Louisan: Of the top 10 who last week became American players, not only the first American since Caruana and So but also Bobby Fischer in 1972 to Ray Robson and Varuzhan become the challenger for Akobian now live there. Top the undisputed World Chess international players also Championship. flock to the Gateway City. In Such a pairing would have August, the world’s best will sounded fantastical when compete there in the sixth I was climbing the chess annual Sinquefield Cup, Olympus in the 1980s, back one of the world’s strongest when the mighty Soviet chess events. machine to which I belonged This feast of chess talent is a boasted a majority of the classic American melting pot. world’s elite players. Consider Caruana was born in Miami, SAINT LOUIS CHESS CLUB/LENNART OOTES that Carlsen captured the learned to play in Brooklyn, 2017 Ultimate Moves Match. title from Viswanathan and spent most of his teenage Anand of India in 2013, and years in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Superstar Effect: Evidence from Chess
    The Queen’s Gambit: Explaining the Superstar Effect Using Evidence from Chess * Eren Bilen† Alexander Matros‡ September 24, 2021 Abstract. Superstars exist in classrooms and workplaces. Superstars can either intimidate others by making their peers put in less effort, or they can encourage others by inspiring everybody to “step up” their game. In this study, we analyze direct and indirect effects of a superstar on their peers using evidence from chess. We find that the direct superstar effect is always negative. The indirect superstar effect depends on the intensity of the superstar: if the skill gap between the superstar and the rest is small (large), there is a positive (negative) peer effect. JEL classification: M52, J3, J44, D3 Keywords: superstar, tournament, effort, chess *We would like to thank seminar participants at Dickinson College, Laboratory Innovation Science at Harvard, Lan- caster University, Murray State University, Sabanci University, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, University of Nebraska Omaha, and University of South Carolina, as well as, participants in the 6th Contests Theory and Evidence conference at the University of East Anglia and the 90th Southern Economic Association Meeting for their questions and suggestions. We thank the Darla Moore School of Business Research Grant Program for the financial support. †Department of Data Analytics, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA 17013. Email: [email protected] ‡Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208. Email: alexan- [email protected] and Department of Economics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected] 1. Introduction "When you play against Bobby [Fischer], it is not a question of whether you win or lose.
    [Show full text]