DOCSLIB.ORG

Smokescreen: Flexible Privacy Controls for Presence-Sharing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Smokescreen: Flexible Privacy Controls for Presence-Sharing SmokeScreen: Flexible Privacy Controls for Presence-Sharing Landon P. Cox, Angela Dalton, and Varun Marupadi Department of Computer Science, Duke University Durham, NC, USA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Presence-sharing is an emerging platform for mobile applications, Presence-sharing is a cooperative service provided by indepen- but presence-privacy remains a challenge. Privacy controls must dent, mobile participants periodically broadcasting their identity be flexible enough to allow sharing between both trusted social re- via short-range wireless technology such as BlueTooth or WiFi. In lations and untrusted strangers. In this paper, we present a sys- combination with location services like GPS and PlaceLab [23], tem called SmokeScreen that provides flexible and power-efficient these networks provide a promising platform for emerging mobile mechanisms for privacy management. and pervasive applications. Examples include automatic tagging of Broadcasting clique signals, which can only be interpreted by mobile data (e.g. digital images or lecture notes) to support file other trusted users, enables sharing between social relations; broad- search [7], mobile social networks [10], and messaging services casting opaque identifiers (OIDs), which can only be resolved to like the “missed connections” feature of CraigsList [7]. an identity by a trusted broker, enables sharing between strangers. Presence-sharing is an attractive alternative to more traditional Computing these messages is power-efficient since they can be pre- pervasive computing architectures because of its low cost, decen- computed with acceptable storage costs. tralized approach, and ease of deployment. For example, projects In evaluating these mechanisms we first analyzed traces from an such as the ContextCam [34] can be used to automatically tag digi- actual presence-sharing application. Four months of traces provide tal images, but require a large investment in sensor and RFID tech- evidence of anonymous snooping, even among trusted users. We nologies. have also implemented our mechanisms on two devices and found Despite the advantages of presence-sharing, privacy protection the power demands of clique signals and OIDs to be reasonable. A remains an important unmet challenge. Mobile users are unlikely to mobile phone running our software can operate for several days on participate if anonymous strangers can roam through a crowd col- a single charge. lecting identities or marketers can surreptitiously compile users’ lo- cation histories. Operating in a decentralized wireless environment Categories and Subject Descriptors makes managing presence-privacy particularly difficult. Wireless broadcasts can be heard by anyone, including unwanted snoopers. D.4.4 [Operating Systems]: Communications ManagementNet- Thus, broadcasts must be constructed so as to only reveal identify- work communication; D.4.6 [Operating Systems]: Security and ing information to a subset of users. Protection—Access Control; D.4.7 [Operating Systems]: Orga- A simple protocol that meets this requirement is one in which nization and DesignDistributed systems; D.4.8 [Operating Sys- members of a trusted group initially negotiate a secret symmetric tems]: PerformanceMeasurements; K.6.5 [Management of Com- key. To later reveal themselves, members broadcast their identity puting and Information Systems]: Security and Protection and a nonce encrypted with the secret key. Message recipients use their secret key to verify that the decrypted content matches a mem- Keywords ber of the group. The drawback of this approach is that it is inflexi- ble: users cannot tune their access control policy to their social en- Location privacy, mobile computing, pervasive computing, presence- vironment nor can they safely share their presence with strangers. sharing, social networks For example, in a file-tagging service users may want to restrict sharing to social relations such as friends, family members, and co- General Terms workers. However, trust in location privacy is a function of fluid so- Human Factors, Measurement, Security cial dynamics and users must be able to adjust their access control policies accordingly. Studies of attitudes toward location privacy have revealed adults who trust their co-workers with their location during business hours but not otherwise [6], teenage girls who trust their parents except when they are socializing with friends [27], and spouses who trust each other except when shopping [6]. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for In addition, restricting presence to established social relations personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are cripples many useful presence-sharing applications. Within a mo- not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bile social network users will likely want to see the presence of both bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific friends and like-minded strangers. For missed connection messag- permission and/or a fee. ing, users must be able to send messages to people they have en- MobiSys ’ 07, June 11-14, 2007, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA. countered but do not know. Copyright 2007 ACM 978-1-59593-614-1/07/0006 ...$5.00. 233 In this paper, we present a privacy management system called social network network provides similar opportunities to meet new SmokeScreen that addresses these issues though two complemen- people only in physical space rather than over the Internet. tary mechanisms. To enable flexible sharing between social re- Social Serendipity [10] typifies such a network. Each Serendip- lations, users broadcast clique signals which can be activated or ity user fills out a profile containing a small photograph, interests, deactivated depending on the social environment. To enable flexi- username, and list of friends. Serendipity also associates each pro- ble sharing between strangers, users also broadcast opaque identi- file with a BlueTooth MAC address and mobile phone number. In fiers (OIDs) which are time-, place-, and broadcaster-specific and social situations, a Serendipity server called BlueDar listens for can only be resolved to an identity via a centralized trusted bro- nearby BlueTooth devices and uses the devices’ MAC addresses to ker. Together these mechanisms allow users to both manage their look up their associated profiles. If there are co-located users with location-privacy and reap the full benefit of presence-sharing. Fur- overlapping interests, Serendipity sends a text message containing thermore, these mechanisms are power-efficient since devices can the profile of each user’s match along with a suggestion that they avoid broadcast-time cryptographic work by pre-computing and meet. Based on the profile’s photo, a user may then look for their comfortably storing 48 hours worth of future signals and OIDs. match in the room and introduce themselves. The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 moti- Finally, our prior work described how presence information can vates the need for flexible privacy controls by describing some rep- be used to support “missed connection” messaging among mobile resentative presence-sharing applications and summarizing a prior users [7]. The term “missed connection” is derived from a fea- study of user attitudes toward location privacy; Section 3 describes ture of the popular website CraigsList. This service allows users SmokeScreen’s trust and threat model; Section 4 describes Smoke- to post messages for people they encountered in the recent past but Screen’s design; Section 5 describes the SmokeScreen prototype; were unable to speak to at the time. Cities such as Boston, New Section 6 evaluates the prototype and examines users’ behavior in York and San Francisco generate hundreds of missed connections a deployed presence-sharing application; Section 7 and Section 8 on craigslist.com each day. Most postings are romantic inquiries, discuss related work and provides our conclusions, respectively. but there are also requests for lost items, such as “did anyone find the laptop I left in my taxi around 2PM,” and notifications of found 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT items, such as “I found a set of keys at the coffeeshop.” While popular, this service is by no means ideal. First, users Presence-sharing is a cooperative service among mobile devices can never be sure if their message has been seen by the intended that provides applications with the identities of co-located users. recipient. Second, authenticating respondents can be difficult. It is More concretely, participants use discovery protocols such as those not uncommon to see messages in which a respondent is required provided by BlueTooth or WiFi to scan for other co-located devices. to provide some detail of the encounter, such as “You were my The set of discovered MAC addresses and device names can then waitress, please tell me what I ordered.” Presence-sharing along be mapped onto a set of identities by higher layers of software. with a trusted service mapping devices to profiles could improve For example, a simple presence-sharing scheme might consist of both problems. users including an email address in their mobile phone’s BlueTooth Users could record the identities of the devices they came into device name. contact with. Then based on the presence information recorded 2.1 Presence-sharing Applications during
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Use of Social Networking Tools
    Regional Use of Social Networking Tools Kate Meeuf December 2014 TECHNICAL REPORT CMU/SEI-2014-TR-018 CERT® Division http://www.sei.cmu.edu Copyright 2014 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by Department of Homeland Security under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the United States Department of Defense. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Department of Homeland Security or the United States Department of Defense. This report was prepared for the SEI Administrative Agent AFLCMC/PZM 20 Schilling Circle, Bldg 1305, 3rd floor Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2125 NO WARRANTY. THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribution except as restricted be- low. Internal use:* Permission to reproduce this material and to prepare derivative works from this material for internal use is granted, provided the copyright and “No Warranty” statements are included with all reproductions and derivative works.
    [Show full text]
  • Archetypes of Enterprise Social Network Users
    Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences j 2018 Archetypes of Enterprise Social Network Users Christian Oettl, Thomas Berger, Markus Böhm, Manuel Wiesche, Helmut Krcmar Technical University of Munich {c.oettl, thomas.berger}@tum.de, {markus.boehm, manuel.wiesche, krcmar}@in.tum.de Abstract organizations will promote the introduction and development of ESNs in the future [8]. Investments in enterprise social networks (ESNs) have However, even if ESNs are implemented in increased rapidly in recent years. However, an ESN organizations, their value contribution appears unclear utilization intensity develops slowly, and there are a because 80% of projects do not fulfill expectations few well-grounded approaches to understand ESN [16]. The typical ROI of any social technology usage. To elaborate on different archetypes of ESN becomes positive when 15% to 25% of employees use users, we conducted a case study that comprised 28 such technology extensively and companies should not interviews with a large IT services company. We assume that “If we build it, they will come” [3]. present a model to characterize ESN users and classify This was also observed in the company that was them as archetypes based on the following two considered in this study. In 2014, a large multinational dimensions: individual openness to ESNs and IT service provider started a radical metamorphosis perceived task-fit. We determine six archetypes of ESN from an email centered to an ESN centered users, namely, power users, limited users, reluctant organization. The implemented solution provides users, repudiators, hidden champions, and question typical key functionalities that characterize an ESN as marks.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SIGNIFICANCE of SOCIAL SOFTWARE Danah Boyd UC
    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOCIAL SOFTWARE danah boyd UC Berkeley School of Information, Berkeley, CA, USA [email protected] http://www.zephoria.org/ Social software… It’s a term that is thrown around frequently, rarely defined, completely elusive, and yet totally significant. What on earth does it mean? And should you care? (IMHO) Of course you should care! Social software is all around us now. It is altering the organization of social life. How do you communicate with loved ones? How do you find information? A lot of this hinges on social software. In this opening essay, I want to address the significance of „social software.” I will look at this from a few different angles, building on the attitudes and practices of creators, users, and researchers of social software. My goal is to lay out some possible approaches for thinking about the types of technologies and behaviors that emerge. What I’m offering is not some truth serum (nor even a proper analysis) – it can and should be contested, questioned, and wrestled with. Let’s begin. Social Software First… what constitutes „social software“? Where does this term come from? In 2002, Clay Shirky (re)claimed the term „social software“ to encompass „all uses of software that supported interacting groups, even if the interaction was offline.“1 His choice was intentional. Although other terms existed – groupware, social computing, computer-mediated communication, etc. – he felt that these older terms In: Burg, Thomas N. / Jan Schmidt (Eds.) BlogTalks Reloaded. Social Software - Research & Cases. Norderstedt: Books on Demand. BlogTalk Reloaded were either polluted or a bad fit to address certain new technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection, Not Barriers: Using Social Software Policies to Guide and Safeguard Students and Employees
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University University Library Faculty Publications Georgia State University Library Fall 2010 Protection, Not Barriers: Using Social Software Policies to Guide and Safeguard Students and Employees Brian K. Kooy Georgia State University, [email protected] Sarah King Steiner Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_facpub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Kooy, B. & Steiner, K. (2010). Protection, not barriers: Using social software policies to guide and safeguard students and employees. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(1), 59-71. doi: 10.5860/ rusq.50n1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Georgia State University Library at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FeAture Protection, not Barriers Using Social Software Policies to Guide and Safeguard Students and Employees Academic librarians have been using social outreach to include online spaces as Brian k. kooy and software and networking sites for public well. One area in which librarians are Sarah k. Steiner services since they appeared on the Inter- providing online outreach is through net. While issues of privacy, identity man- the use of social software and social Brian K. Kooy is Philosophy, Religious agement, and self-disclosure when using networking websites such as Facebook Studies, and Middle East Studies such technologies have been written about, and MySpace. Even most library blogs Librarian and Sarah K.
    [Show full text]
  • The (R)Evolution of Social Media in Software Engineering
    The (R)Evolution of Social Media in Software Engineering Margaret-Anne Storey Leif Singer Brendan Cleary University of Victoria University of Victoria University of Victoria Victoria, BC, Canada Victoria, BC, Canada Victoria, BC, Canada [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fernando Figueira Filho Alexey Zagalsky Universidade Federal do Rio University of Victoria Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil Victoria, BC, Canada [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Software developers rely on media to communicate, learn, A few years after the term \software engineering" was collaborate, and coordinate with others. Recently, social coined at a 1968 NATO conference [49], Weinberg media has dramatically changed the landscape of software published his acclaimed book on the \Psychology of engineering, challenging some old assumptions about how Computer Programming." [78] Weinberg emphasizes that developers learn and work with one another. We see the although programming is an activity that can be rise of the social programmer who actively participates in performed alone, it relies on extensive social activities as online communities and openly contributes to the creation developers will often have to ask others for help. of a large body of crowdsourced socio-technical content. The need to collaborate and interact with others has In this paper, we examine the past, present, and future only increased over time. Even solitary developers need to roles of social media in software engineering. We provide a interact directly or indirectly with others to learn, to review of research that examines the use of different media understand requirements and to seek feedback on their channels in software engineering from 1968 to the present creations.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Software
    social software Everyone’s an Author: Wikis and Blogs Wikis and blogs are two kinds of social software that are centered on authorship. Wikis allow some groups of people (ranging from a limited set of members to anyone with access to the web) to edit the web pages that make up a website. They also provide ways to discuss the pages as a separate process from altering them, and ways to compare different versions of the page over time. Wikis are especially useful for collaborative writing and knowledge sharing, with Wikipedia (www.wikipedia. org) being one of the best known examples. For local examples of wikis, check out http://wiki.williams.edu (an official college wiki) and http://wso.williams.edu/wiki/ index.php/Main_Page (a student run wiki about all things Williams). A number of Blackboard courses also use wikis as a framework for student collaboration. With wikis, the content organization is arbitrary (but usually topical and hierarchical) and it’s owned by the entire community; every member of the community has as much right to alter the content as any other member (though practically speaking there’s usually a core group of the most active members which act as moderators). Blogs are a way for one or more authors to publish things organized primarily by time, and for the readers and author to discuss what’s posted. People read and write blogs for a variety of reasons, ranging from keeping in touch with far flung friends, to learning and talking about particular subjects, to keeping up on the cutting edge of news.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Software: E-Learning Beyond Learning Management Systems
    Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems Christian Dalsgaard [[email protected]] Institute of Information and Media Studies University of Aarhus Helsingforsgade 14, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark [http://www.imv.au.dk] Introduction Whether focusing on distance education or campus based education, universities all over the world are using learning management systems (LMS) to support and improve learning within their institution. Yet the OECD (2005) report "E-learning in Tertiary Education: Where do we stand?" indicates that universities primarily use LMS for administrative purposes, and that LMS so far have had a limited impact on pedagogy: "ICT has penetrated tertiary education, but has had more impact on administrative services (e.g. admissions, registration, fee payment, purchasing) than on the pedagogic fundamentals of the classroom." (OECD, 2005, p. 15) This article will discuss the use of centralized and integrated LMS and argue that they, within a framework of a social constructivist pedagogy, should play only a minor role within organization of e-learning. It is argued that social software tools can support a social constructivist approach to e- learning by providing students with personal tools and engaging them in social networks. Using social software in this way requires that organization of e-learning moves beyond centralized and integrated LMS and towards a variety of separate tools which are used and managed by the students in relation to their self-governed work. It is argued that social software tools enable a different way of using the web within an educational context. The article discusses how social software can be used to support a social constructivist approach to e-learning, or more specifically, how social software can support self-governed, problem-based and collaborative activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy by Design: Does It Matter for Social Networks?
    Privacy by Design: Does it matter for Social Networks? Mohammad Badiul Islam 1, 2 , Renato Iannella 1, 3 1 Computer Science Discipline, Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology 2 NICTA (National ICT Australia), Queensland Research Lab, Brisbane, Australia. 3 Semantic Identity, Brisbane, Australia. [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract: Privacy is an important component of freedom and plays a key role in protecting fundamental human rights. It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the fact that without appropriate levels of privacy, a person’s rights are diminished. Users want to protect their privacy - particularly in “privacy inva- sive” areas such as social networks. However, Social Network users seldom know how to protect their own privacy through online mechanisms. What is re- quired is an emerging concept that provides users legitimate control over their own personal information, whilst preserving and maintaining the advantages of engaging with online services such as Social Networks. This paper reviews “Privacy by Design (PbD)” and shows how it applies to diverse privacy areas. Such an approach will move towards mitigating many of the privacy issues in online information systems and can be a potential pathway for protecting users’ personal information. The research has also posed many questions in need of further investigation for different open source distributed Social Networks. Findings from this research will lead to a novel distributed architecture that provides more transparent and accountable privacy for the users of online in- formation systems. Keywords: Privacy by Design, Social Networks, Privacy, Access Control, Mo- bile Social Networks, Distributed Social Networks, Open Source Social Net- works, Diaspora, Clique.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of the Driving Forces Behind Online Communities Sergio L
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1066-2243.htm INTR 19,4 An empirical study of the driving forces behind online communities Sergio L. Toral, M. Rocı´o Martı´nez-Torres, Federico Barrero and 378 Francisco Corte´s University of Seville, Seville, Spain Received 11 June 2008 Accepted 17 May 2009 Abstract Purpose – A large variety of online communities have emerged during the last years as a result of the challenges faced by both the business and scientific worlds. This trend has also been promoted by the development of internet and new Web 2.0 technologies. In this context, this paper is focused on the determinants of success of online communities. But, as a difference from other studies, these determinants are analyzed from the social network analysis perspective. Several constructs related to the community organization as a social network are proposed and their interrelations are hypothesized in a general research framework. The obtained results test the proposed model providing the most relevant antecedents of the project success. Design/methodology/approach – A case study based on Linux ports to non-conventional processor and environments is used to test the proposed model. Structural equation modeling analysis is used to validate the structural proposed model. Findings – The main antecedents of online communities’ success, quantifying the strength of the relation through the standardized path coefficients. Research limitations/implications – The research is limited to a particular set of online communities engaged with the development of the non-conventional Linux ports. However, they constitute a representative set of communities in the field of the open source projects (OSS) development, which are typically developed using a community of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Social Networking
    Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Fakult¨atf¨urInformatik Contextual Social Networking Dipl.-Phys., Dipl.-Inform. Dr.rer.nat. Georg Groh Habilitationsschrift Mitglieder des Habilitationskomittees: Prof. Dr. Johann Schlichter Prof. Dr. Bettina Berendt Prof. Dr. Helmut Seidl Kurz-Zusammenfassung Der zentrale Gegenstand der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die vielschichtige Frage, wie Kontexte detektiert und abgeleitet werden k¨onnen,die dazu dienen k¨onnen,neuar- tige kontextbewusste Social Networking Dienste zu schaffen und bestehende Di- enste in ihrem Nutzwert zu verbessern. Die (noch nicht abgeschlossene) erfolgre- iche Umsetzung dieses Programmes f¨uhrtauf ein Konzept, das man als Contextual Social Networking bezeichnen kann. In einem grundlegenden ersten Teil werden die eng zusammenh¨angendenGebiete Contextual Social Networking, Mobile Social Networking und Decentralized Social Networking mit verschiedenen Methoden und unter Fokussierung auf verschiedene Detail-Aspekte n¨aherbeleuchtet und in Zusam- menhang gesetzt. Ein zweiter Teil behandelt die Frage, wie soziale Kurzzeit- und Langzeit-Kontexte als f¨urdas Social Networking besonders interessante Formen von Kontext gemessen und abgeleitet werden k¨onnen. Ein Fokus liegt hierbei auf NLP Methoden zur Charakterisierung sozialer Beziehungen als einer typischen Form von sozialem Langzeit-Kontext. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt liegt auf Methoden aus dem Mobile Social Signal Processing zur Ableitung sinnvoller sozialer Kurzzeit-Kontexte auf der Basis von Interaktionsgeometrien und Audio-Daten. Es wird ferner unter- sucht, wie pers¨onliche soziale Agenten Kontext-Elemente verschiedener Abstraktion- sgrade miteinander kombinieren k¨onnen.Der dritte Teil behandelt neuartige und verbesserte Konzepte f¨urkontextbewusste Social Networking Dienste. Es werden spezielle Formen von Awareness Diensten, neue Formen von sozialem Information Retrieval, Konzepte f¨urkontextbewusstes Privacy Management und Dienste und Plattformen zur Unterst¨utzungvon Open Innovation und Kreativit¨atuntersucht und vorgestellt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Discussion on Social Software: Concept, Building Blocks and Challenges
    International Journal for Infonomics (IJI), Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2010 A Discussion on Social Software: Concept, Building Blocks and Challenges Roberto Pereira M. Cecilia C. Baranauskas Sergio R. P. da Silva Institute of Computing Institute of Computing Department of Informatics University of Campinas University of Campinas State University of Maringá Abstract interaction are extended to issues related to human- computer-human interaction in social situations. The possibility of developing more interactive and Despite the popularity and the growing in the innovative applications led to an explosion in the number of users of the social software, just a small amount of systems available on the web in which fraction of systems is really successful. To Webb [2], users interact with each other and have a primary the main particularity of social software is in the role as producers of content — the so-called social design process, because human factors and group software. However, despite their popularity, few of dynamics introduce design difficulties that are not these systems keep an effective participation of users, obvious without considering the human psychology promoting a continuous and productive interaction. and nature. Moreover, as Silva and Pereira [3] argue, This paper examines the concept of social software due to the recent emergence and popularization of and analyzes the social software honeycomb, a social software it is still necessary to understand the framework to help in understanding this kind of impacts that this new range of applications cause, system. Based on the analysis of an inclusive social both in social and technological aspects. Likewise, it network and on literature review, we revisit that is necessary to study the new challenges raised by framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Alwaysocial: Social Networking in the Real World
    AlwaySocial: Social Networking in the Real World Nir J. Peer Department of Computer Science A.V. Williams Building University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT tion, they act as an enhanced directory service that allows Social networking is nowadays a popular way for people to users to keep a communication path with friends and ac- socialize and network professionally. Currently, social net- quaintances even when they relocate or change their contact working websites provide a mostly online experience whether information. Furthermore, by exposing one’s friends, users they are accessed from a computer or a mobile phone. This are able to reconnect with old contacts who they have lost leads to a chasm between online social activities and those touch with. In other words, social networks allow users to done in the actual world. As there is no direct way to turn maintain existing- and reconstitute lost- social connections. an online acquaintance to a real friend, users are required to They also allow to meet or get introduced to new people de- constantly synchronize between the two activities. pending on the particular website’s etiquette. Another excit- ing feature of social networks, is that they sometimes allow to Social Proximity Applications (SPA) aim to introduce tech- discover cliques and mutual connections that were not appar- nology into real world networking in order to facilitate it. ent. This is closely related to the Small World or six degrees However, they often use proprietary and restricted profile of separation hypothesis. systems and therefore do not bridge the online/offline gap.
    [Show full text]