Contextual Social Networking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contextual Social Networking Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Fakult¨atf¨urInformatik Contextual Social Networking Dipl.-Phys., Dipl.-Inform. Dr.rer.nat. Georg Groh Habilitationsschrift Mitglieder des Habilitationskomittees: Prof. Dr. Johann Schlichter Prof. Dr. Bettina Berendt Prof. Dr. Helmut Seidl Kurz-Zusammenfassung Der zentrale Gegenstand der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die vielschichtige Frage, wie Kontexte detektiert und abgeleitet werden k¨onnen,die dazu dienen k¨onnen,neuar- tige kontextbewusste Social Networking Dienste zu schaffen und bestehende Di- enste in ihrem Nutzwert zu verbessern. Die (noch nicht abgeschlossene) erfolgre- iche Umsetzung dieses Programmes f¨uhrtauf ein Konzept, das man als Contextual Social Networking bezeichnen kann. In einem grundlegenden ersten Teil werden die eng zusammenh¨angendenGebiete Contextual Social Networking, Mobile Social Networking und Decentralized Social Networking mit verschiedenen Methoden und unter Fokussierung auf verschiedene Detail-Aspekte n¨aherbeleuchtet und in Zusam- menhang gesetzt. Ein zweiter Teil behandelt die Frage, wie soziale Kurzzeit- und Langzeit-Kontexte als f¨urdas Social Networking besonders interessante Formen von Kontext gemessen und abgeleitet werden k¨onnen. Ein Fokus liegt hierbei auf NLP Methoden zur Charakterisierung sozialer Beziehungen als einer typischen Form von sozialem Langzeit-Kontext. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt liegt auf Methoden aus dem Mobile Social Signal Processing zur Ableitung sinnvoller sozialer Kurzzeit-Kontexte auf der Basis von Interaktionsgeometrien und Audio-Daten. Es wird ferner unter- sucht, wie pers¨onliche soziale Agenten Kontext-Elemente verschiedener Abstraktion- sgrade miteinander kombinieren k¨onnen.Der dritte Teil behandelt neuartige und verbesserte Konzepte f¨urkontextbewusste Social Networking Dienste. Es werden spezielle Formen von Awareness Diensten, neue Formen von sozialem Information Retrieval, Konzepte f¨urkontextbewusstes Privacy Management und Dienste und Plattformen zur Unterst¨utzungvon Open Innovation und Kreativit¨atuntersucht und vorgestellt. Diese Version der Habilitationsschrift enth¨altdie inkludierten Publikationen zur Vermeidung von Copyright-Verletzungen auf Seiten der Journals u.a. nicht. Kon- takt in Bezug auf die Version mit allen inkludierten Publikationen: Georg Groh, [email protected]. Abstract The thesis centers around the multi-faceted research question of how contexts may be detected and derived that can be used for new context aware Social Networking services and for improving the usefulness of existing Social Networking services, giv- ing rise to the notion of Contextual Social Networking. In a first foundational part, we characterize the closely related fields of Contextual-, Mobile-, and Decentral- ized Social Networking using different methods and focusing on different detailed aspects. A second part focuses on the question of how short-term and long-term social contexts as especially interesting forms of context for Social Networking may be derived. We focus on NLP based methods for the characterization of social re- lations as a typical form of long-term social contexts and on Mobile Social Signal Processing methods for deriving short-term social contexts on the basis of geome- try of interaction and audio. We furthermore investigate, how personal social agents may combine such social context elements on various levels of abstraction. The third part discusses new and improved context aware Social Networking service concepts. We investigate special forms of awareness services, new forms of social information retrieval, social recommender systems, context aware privacy concepts and services and platforms supporting Open Innovation and creative processes. This version of the thesis does not contain the included publications because of copyrights of the journals etc. Contact in terms of the version with all included publications: Georg Groh, [email protected]. iv Contents Introduction1 I Foundations9 1 Contextual Social Networking 11 1.1 Social Networking............................ 11 1.1.1 Web 2.0 and Social Media.................... 12 1.1.2 Technical Aspects........................ 15 1.1.3 Social Media Classes....................... 16 1.1.4 Social Networking........................ 24 1.1.5 Social Networking Services................... 25 1.1.6 SN vs. Community Computing................. 26 1.1.7 Related Scientific Disciplines.................. 26 1.2 Context-Aware Computing and Contextual Social Networking.... 27 1.2.1 Context-Aware Computing................... 28 1.2.2 Contextual Social Networking.................. 30 1.3 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 34 1.4 An Early Study on Context-Aware Community Support Systems *. 35 2 Mobile Social Networking 37 2.1 Network-based Scientometric Characterization of the Field MSN *. 37 2.2 Mobile Social Networking Services and Platforms *.......... 39 2.3 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 39 3 Architectural Elements of Decentralized Social Networking 41 3.1 Decentralized Social Networking.................... 41 3.1.1 Personal Social Agents...................... 42 3.1.2 Peer-to-Peer Social Networking................. 43 v vi CONTENTS 3.1.3 Social Semantic Web....................... 44 3.1.4 Comparing DSN and CSN Scenarios.............. 44 3.2 Group Management in DSN Scenarios *................ 46 3.3 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 46 II Determining Social Context 49 4 Enriching Social Relation Models 51 4.1 Overview of Part II: Detecting and Modeling Social Context..... 51 4.2 Conceptualizations and Other Characterizations for Social Relations 52 4.3 Folksonomies for Social Relations *................... 54 4.4 Characterizing Social Relations via NLP-based Analysis *...... 55 4.5 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 57 5 Social Situations I: Geometry of Interaction 59 5.1 Short-Term Social Context and Mobile Sensing............ 59 5.1.1 Mobile Social Signal Processing and Reality Mining..... 60 5.2 Social Situations............................. 62 5.3 Detecting Social Situations via Interaction Geometry......... 68 5.3.1 Infrastructure-Free Measurement of Interaction Geometry.. 70 5.3.2 Detection of and Applications for Social Situations *..... 72 5.4 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 74 6 Social Situations II: Audio Signals and the Combination of Evi- dence from Multiple Sources 77 6.1 Audio in Social Signal Processing.................... 78 6.2 Detection of Social Interaction via Turn-Taking Patterns *...... 79 6.3 Speaker Diarization and Direct Audio Based Methods for Social In- teraction Detection............................ 80 6.3.1 General Speaker Diarization................... 80 6.3.2 Specific Approaches for Social Interaction Detection..... 81 6.3.2.1 Problem Conditions and Corpora.......... 82 6.3.2.2 Performance of State of the Art Approaches.... 83 6.3.2.3 Direct Energy-based Detection of Turn Taking and Social Interaction................... 85 6.4 Combining Multiple Evidences for Social Situation Detection *... 91 6.5 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 91 CONTENTS vii III Applications of Social Context 93 7 Awareness and Communication Services and Activity Prediction 95 7.1 Overview of Part III: Social Networking Services and Social Context 95 7.2 Awareness and Visualization...................... 96 7.2.1 Visualization of Social Context Dynamics as an Awareness Service in (Mobile) Social Networking............. 96 7.2.2 Hierarchical Temporal Visualization of Communication Events and Resulting Social Relation Abstractions.......... 97 7.2.3 Visualization of Social Network Dynamics *.......... 100 7.2.4 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research...... 101 7.3 Social Life-Logging & Socio-Casting *................. 102 7.3.1 Social Life-Logging........................ 102 7.3.2 Socio-Casting........................... 105 7.3.3 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research...... 106 7.4 Social Activity Prediction *....................... 107 7.4.1 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research...... 108 8 Privacy Management 111 8.1 Privacy Management in Social Networking............... 111 8.2 Inferring Profile Attributes *...................... 112 8.3 Contextual Privacy Management in SN and MSN........... 113 8.3.1 An Online Survey........................ 113 8.3.2 A Study on Context-Aware Privacy Management Concepts in SN................................. 115 8.3.3 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research...... 118 8.4 Privacy, Information Flow Control and Information Markets..... 119 8.4.1 Contextual Privacy Management Concept *.......... 120 8.4.2 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research...... 121 9 Information Applications 123 9.1 Information Services........................... 123 9.1.1 Flavors of Services in SN and MSN............... 123 9.1.2 Context and Unconscious Information Needs......... 125 9.1.3 Human IR............................. 127 9.2 An Alternative Information Retrieval Approach for Decentralized SN and MSN *................................ 129 9.2.1 Implementation and Test.................... 132 viii CONTENTS 9.3 Evaluating Alternative IR Principles Based on Human IR...... 135 9.3.1 Evaluation Study......................... 135 9.3.2 Studying Interrelations between Spatio-Temporal, Social and Semantic Contexts........................ 136 9.3.3 Information Retrieval Experiments............... 139 9.4 Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research.......... 143 10 Social Recommender
Recommended publications
  • Regional Use of Social Networking Tools
    Regional Use of Social Networking Tools Kate Meeuf December 2014 TECHNICAL REPORT CMU/SEI-2014-TR-018 CERT® Division http://www.sei.cmu.edu Copyright 2014 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by Department of Homeland Security under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the United States Department of Defense. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Department of Homeland Security or the United States Department of Defense. This report was prepared for the SEI Administrative Agent AFLCMC/PZM 20 Schilling Circle, Bldg 1305, 3rd floor Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2125 NO WARRANTY. THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribution except as restricted be- low. Internal use:* Permission to reproduce this material and to prepare derivative works from this material for internal use is granted, provided the copyright and “No Warranty” statements are included with all reproductions and derivative works.
    [Show full text]
  • Archetypes of Enterprise Social Network Users
    Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences j 2018 Archetypes of Enterprise Social Network Users Christian Oettl, Thomas Berger, Markus Böhm, Manuel Wiesche, Helmut Krcmar Technical University of Munich {c.oettl, thomas.berger}@tum.de, {markus.boehm, manuel.wiesche, krcmar}@in.tum.de Abstract organizations will promote the introduction and development of ESNs in the future [8]. Investments in enterprise social networks (ESNs) have However, even if ESNs are implemented in increased rapidly in recent years. However, an ESN organizations, their value contribution appears unclear utilization intensity develops slowly, and there are a because 80% of projects do not fulfill expectations few well-grounded approaches to understand ESN [16]. The typical ROI of any social technology usage. To elaborate on different archetypes of ESN becomes positive when 15% to 25% of employees use users, we conducted a case study that comprised 28 such technology extensively and companies should not interviews with a large IT services company. We assume that “If we build it, they will come” [3]. present a model to characterize ESN users and classify This was also observed in the company that was them as archetypes based on the following two considered in this study. In 2014, a large multinational dimensions: individual openness to ESNs and IT service provider started a radical metamorphosis perceived task-fit. We determine six archetypes of ESN from an email centered to an ESN centered users, namely, power users, limited users, reluctant organization. The implemented solution provides users, repudiators, hidden champions, and question typical key functionalities that characterize an ESN as marks.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SIGNIFICANCE of SOCIAL SOFTWARE Danah Boyd UC
    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOCIAL SOFTWARE danah boyd UC Berkeley School of Information, Berkeley, CA, USA [email protected] http://www.zephoria.org/ Social software… It’s a term that is thrown around frequently, rarely defined, completely elusive, and yet totally significant. What on earth does it mean? And should you care? (IMHO) Of course you should care! Social software is all around us now. It is altering the organization of social life. How do you communicate with loved ones? How do you find information? A lot of this hinges on social software. In this opening essay, I want to address the significance of „social software.” I will look at this from a few different angles, building on the attitudes and practices of creators, users, and researchers of social software. My goal is to lay out some possible approaches for thinking about the types of technologies and behaviors that emerge. What I’m offering is not some truth serum (nor even a proper analysis) – it can and should be contested, questioned, and wrestled with. Let’s begin. Social Software First… what constitutes „social software“? Where does this term come from? In 2002, Clay Shirky (re)claimed the term „social software“ to encompass „all uses of software that supported interacting groups, even if the interaction was offline.“1 His choice was intentional. Although other terms existed – groupware, social computing, computer-mediated communication, etc. – he felt that these older terms In: Burg, Thomas N. / Jan Schmidt (Eds.) BlogTalks Reloaded. Social Software - Research & Cases. Norderstedt: Books on Demand. BlogTalk Reloaded were either polluted or a bad fit to address certain new technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges for Standardization in Mobile Social Networks
    Opportunities and Challenges for Standardization in Mobile Social Networks Laurent-Walter Goix, Telecom Italia [email protected] Bryan Sullivan, AT&T [email protected] Abstract This paper describes the opportunities and challenges related to the standardization of interoperable “Mobile Social Networks”. Challenges addressed include the effect of social networks on resource usage, the need for social network federation, and the needs for a standards context. The concept of Mobile Federated Social Networks as defined in the OMA SNEW specification is introduced as an approach to some of these challenges. Further specific needs and opportunities in standards and developer support for mobile social apps are described, including potentially further work in support of regulatory requirements. Finally, we conclude that a common standard is needed for making mobile social networks interoperable, while addressing privacy concerns from users & institutions as well as the differentiations of service providers. 1 INTRODUCTION Online Social Networks (OSN) are dominated by Walled Gardens that have attracted users by offering new paradigms of communication / content exchange that better fit their modern lifestyle. Issues are emerging related to data ownership, privacy and identity management and some institutions such as the European Commission have started to provide measures for controlling this. The impressive access to OSN from ever smarter mobile devices, as well as the growth of mobile- specific SN services (e.g. WhatsApp) have further stimulated the mobile industry that is already starving for new attractive services (RCS 1). In this context OMA 2 as mobile industry forum has recently promoted the SNEW specifications that can leverage network services such as user identity and native interoperability of mobile networks (the approach promoted by “federated social networks”).
    [Show full text]
  • Protection, Not Barriers: Using Social Software Policies to Guide and Safeguard Students and Employees
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University University Library Faculty Publications Georgia State University Library Fall 2010 Protection, Not Barriers: Using Social Software Policies to Guide and Safeguard Students and Employees Brian K. Kooy Georgia State University, [email protected] Sarah King Steiner Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_facpub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Kooy, B. & Steiner, K. (2010). Protection, not barriers: Using social software policies to guide and safeguard students and employees. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(1), 59-71. doi: 10.5860/ rusq.50n1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Georgia State University Library at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FeAture Protection, not Barriers Using Social Software Policies to Guide and Safeguard Students and Employees Academic librarians have been using social outreach to include online spaces as Brian k. kooy and software and networking sites for public well. One area in which librarians are Sarah k. Steiner services since they appeared on the Inter- providing online outreach is through net. While issues of privacy, identity man- the use of social software and social Brian K. Kooy is Philosophy, Religious agement, and self-disclosure when using networking websites such as Facebook Studies, and Middle East Studies such technologies have been written about, and MySpace. Even most library blogs Librarian and Sarah K.
    [Show full text]
  • The (R)Evolution of Social Media in Software Engineering
    The (R)Evolution of Social Media in Software Engineering Margaret-Anne Storey Leif Singer Brendan Cleary University of Victoria University of Victoria University of Victoria Victoria, BC, Canada Victoria, BC, Canada Victoria, BC, Canada [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Fernando Figueira Filho Alexey Zagalsky Universidade Federal do Rio University of Victoria Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil Victoria, BC, Canada [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Software developers rely on media to communicate, learn, A few years after the term \software engineering" was collaborate, and coordinate with others. Recently, social coined at a 1968 NATO conference [49], Weinberg media has dramatically changed the landscape of software published his acclaimed book on the \Psychology of engineering, challenging some old assumptions about how Computer Programming." [78] Weinberg emphasizes that developers learn and work with one another. We see the although programming is an activity that can be rise of the social programmer who actively participates in performed alone, it relies on extensive social activities as online communities and openly contributes to the creation developers will often have to ask others for help. of a large body of crowdsourced socio-technical content. The need to collaborate and interact with others has In this paper, we examine the past, present, and future only increased over time. Even solitary developers need to roles of social media in software engineering. We provide a interact directly or indirectly with others to learn, to review of research that examines the use of different media understand requirements and to seek feedback on their channels in software engineering from 1968 to the present creations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaverse Roadmap Overview, 2007. 2007
    A Cross-Industry Public Foresight Project Co-Authors Contributing Authors John Smart, Acceleration Studies Foundation Corey Bridges, Multiverse Jamais Cascio, Open the Future Jochen Hummel, Metaversum Jerry Paffendorf, The Electric Sheep Company James Hursthouse, OGSi Randal Moss, American Cancer Society Lead Reviewers Edward Castronova, Indiana University Richard Marks, Sony Computer Entertainment Alexander Macris, Themis Group Rueben Steiger, Millions of Us LEAD SPONSOR FOUNDING PARTNERS Futuring and Innovation Center Graphic Design: FizBit.com accelerating.org metaverseroadmap.org MVR Summit Attendees Distinguished industry leaders, technologists, analysts, and creatives who provided their insights in various 3D web domains. Bridget C. Agabra Project Manager, Metaverse Roadmap Project Patrick Lincoln Director, Computer Science Department, SRI Janna Anderson Dir. of Pew Internet’s Imagining the Internet; Asst. International Prof. of Communications, Elon University Julian Lombardi Architect, Open Croquet; Assistant VP for Tod Antilla Flash Developer, American Cancer Society Academic Services and Technology Support, Office of Information Technology Wagner James Au Blogger, New World Notes; Author, The Making of Second Life, 2008 Richard Marks Creator of the EyeToy camera interface; Director of Special Projects, Sony CEA R&D Jeremy Bailenson Director, Virtual Human Interaction Lab, Stanford University Bob Moore Sociologist, Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), PlayOn project Betsy Book Director of Product Management, Makena Technologies/There;
    [Show full text]
  • Social Software
    social software Everyone’s an Author: Wikis and Blogs Wikis and blogs are two kinds of social software that are centered on authorship. Wikis allow some groups of people (ranging from a limited set of members to anyone with access to the web) to edit the web pages that make up a website. They also provide ways to discuss the pages as a separate process from altering them, and ways to compare different versions of the page over time. Wikis are especially useful for collaborative writing and knowledge sharing, with Wikipedia (www.wikipedia. org) being one of the best known examples. For local examples of wikis, check out http://wiki.williams.edu (an official college wiki) and http://wso.williams.edu/wiki/ index.php/Main_Page (a student run wiki about all things Williams). A number of Blackboard courses also use wikis as a framework for student collaboration. With wikis, the content organization is arbitrary (but usually topical and hierarchical) and it’s owned by the entire community; every member of the community has as much right to alter the content as any other member (though practically speaking there’s usually a core group of the most active members which act as moderators). Blogs are a way for one or more authors to publish things organized primarily by time, and for the readers and author to discuss what’s posted. People read and write blogs for a variety of reasons, ranging from keeping in touch with far flung friends, to learning and talking about particular subjects, to keeping up on the cutting edge of news.
    [Show full text]
  • Blogging Glossary
    Blogging Glossary Glossary: General Terms Atom: A popular feed format developed as an alternative to RSS. Autocasting: Automated form of podcasting that allows bloggers and blog readers to generate audio versions of text blogs from RSS feeds. Audioblog: A blog where the posts consist mainly of voice recordings sent by mobile phone, sometimes with some short text message added for metadata purposes. (cf. podcasting) Blawg: A law blog. Bleg: An entry in a blog requesting information or contributions. Blog Carnival: A blog article that contains links to other articles covering a specific topic. Most blog carnivals are hosted by a rotating list of frequent contributors to the carnival, and serve to both generate new posts by contributors and highlight new bloggers posting matter in that subject area. Blog client: (weblog client) is software to manage (post, edit) blogs from operating system with no need to launch a web browser. A typical blog client has an editor, a spell-checker and a few more options that simplify content creation and editing. Blog publishing service: A software which is used to create the blog. Some of the most popular are WordPress, Blogger, TypePad, Movable Type and Joomla. Blogger: Person who runs a blog. Also blogger.com, a popular blog hosting web site. Rarely: weblogger. Blogirl: A female blogger Bloggernacle: Blogs written by and for Mormons (a portmanteau of "blog" and "Tabernacle"). Generally refers to faithful Mormon bloggers and sometimes refers to a specific grouping of faithful Mormon bloggers. Bloggies: One of the most popular blog awards. Blogroll: A list of other blogs that a blogger might recommend by providing links to them (usually in a sidebar list).
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation the Working Narrative
    DISSERTATION THE WORKING NARRATIVE: ANALYSIS OF LINGUISTIC STRUCTURES AND STYLES IN LIFE STORYTELLING ON SOCIAL MEDIA Submitted by Michael Humphrey Department of Journalism and Media Communication In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2017 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Patrick Plaisance Marilee Long Ashley Anderson Sarah Sloane Kate Mason Copyright by Michael Lee Humphrey 2017 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE WORKING NARRATIVE: ANALYSIS OF LINGUISTIC STRUCTURES AND STYLES IN LIFE STORYTELLING ON SOCIAL MEDIA The stories we tell ourselves, and others, define us. What does that mean when we enter digital life and populate social media networks? In this dissertation, I examine the linguistic structures and styles of content created by people who are specifically prompted to tell a story from their lives. This dissertation focuses on two distinct types of storytelling social media platforms: Cowbird is an self-mediatizing, open site that primes users with life story cues and prompts them to “Tell a story,” while Humans of New York is a filtered, gated-mediatized platform run by one curator who posts pictures and short life narratives on Facebook, Tumblr, his own blog and several other social platforms. I sought to find distinct and/or common narrative structural and stylistic characteristics of the content. Using a combination of Quantitative Content Analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (Pennebaker et al., 2007; Pennebaker et al., 2015), this project includes three related studies that begin with basic questions about narrative structures and concludes with two factor analyses of latent linguistic variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Software: E-Learning Beyond Learning Management Systems
    Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems Christian Dalsgaard [[email protected]] Institute of Information and Media Studies University of Aarhus Helsingforsgade 14, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark [http://www.imv.au.dk] Introduction Whether focusing on distance education or campus based education, universities all over the world are using learning management systems (LMS) to support and improve learning within their institution. Yet the OECD (2005) report "E-learning in Tertiary Education: Where do we stand?" indicates that universities primarily use LMS for administrative purposes, and that LMS so far have had a limited impact on pedagogy: "ICT has penetrated tertiary education, but has had more impact on administrative services (e.g. admissions, registration, fee payment, purchasing) than on the pedagogic fundamentals of the classroom." (OECD, 2005, p. 15) This article will discuss the use of centralized and integrated LMS and argue that they, within a framework of a social constructivist pedagogy, should play only a minor role within organization of e-learning. It is argued that social software tools can support a social constructivist approach to e- learning by providing students with personal tools and engaging them in social networks. Using social software in this way requires that organization of e-learning moves beyond centralized and integrated LMS and towards a variety of separate tools which are used and managed by the students in relation to their self-governed work. It is argued that social software tools enable a different way of using the web within an educational context. The article discusses how social software can be used to support a social constructivist approach to e-learning, or more specifically, how social software can support self-governed, problem-based and collaborative activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tech Giant Everyone Is Watching
    Inside Assad’s new Syria America’s Supreme Court swings right Bog-roll Boris, the busted flush How to make meetings less dreadful JUNE 30TH–JULY 6TH 2018 Thetechgiant everyone is watching Contents The Economist June 30th 2018 5 8 The world this week United States 34 The Supreme Court Leaders Right of way 11 Netflixonomics 35 Bureaucracy The tech giant everyone Shuffle up is watching 36 School design 12 America’s Supreme Court Brutalism After Kennedy 36 Immigration policy 12 The war in Syria How we got here The new Palestinians 39 Lexington Brexit and business Amid a 13 Railways India and America row between business leaders Free the rails and Conservative hardliners, a 14 China’s university- The Americas softer Brexit gains political On the cover entrance exam 40 Canada’s climate policy ground, page 21 Netflix has transformed Gaokao gruel Trudeau and the Toronto television. It is beloved by troublemaker investors, consumers and Letters 41 Funerals in Cuba politicians. Can that last? 15 On trade, surveillance Not going gently Leader, page11. The technology, Xinjiang, 41 Brazilian agriculture entertainment industry is football, Brexit Embrapa’s lost sparkle scrabbling to catch up with a disrupter, page18. The 42 Bello internet was meant to make Briefing The high price of political saviours the world a less centralised 18 Netflixonomics place, but the opposite has The television will be happened. Ludwig Siegele revolutionised Special report: explains why it matters, and Fixing the internet what can be done about it. US Supreme Court Justice The ins and outs See our special report after Britain Anthony Kennedy’s retirement After page 42 page 42 21 Business and politics comes at a worrying time: Hard Brexit unravels leader, page12.
    [Show full text]