DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image 1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Scirpophaga nivella Fabricius 1794 (Lepidoptera:Crambidae) Common Name White Rice Borer Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/142298 Image Library Australian Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/ Partners for Australian Biosecurity image library Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment https://www.awe.gov.au/ Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia https://dpird.wa.gov.au/ Plant Health Australia https://www.planthealthaustralia.com.au/ Museums Victoria https://museumsvictoria.com.au/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: DAFF Biosecurity Darwin - daff.gov.au Author: S. Anderson & L. Tran-Nguyen Citation: S. Anderson & L. Tran-Nguyen (2012) White Rice Borer(Scirpophaga nivella)Updated on 2/27/2012 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/142298 2.3. Facets Commodity Overview: Field Crops and Pastures Commodity Type: Rice Distribution: Australasian - Oceanian, South and South-East Asia Group: Moths Status: Australian Native Species 2.4. Other Names Apurima nivella (Fabricius); Aurivillius 1898 Crambus nivella (Fabricius); Aurivillius 1898 Crambus niveus (Fabricius) Fabricius 1798; Zimsen 1964 Paddy stemborer Schoenobius brunnescens (Moore) Hampson 1895; 1896 (as a synonym of Schoenobius adjurellus Walker) Schoenobius celidias Meyrick 1894; Hampson 1895 (as a synonym of Schoenobius adjurellus Walker) Scirpophaga auriflua Zeller 1863; Moore 1867; Hampson 1895 Scirpophaga brunnescens Moore 1888 Scirpophaga butyrota Meyrick: sensu Meyrick 1889 (misidentification) Scirpophaga chrysorrhoa Zeller 1863; Hampson 1895; 1896; Leech 1901 Scirpophaga euclastalis Strand 1918 Scirpophaga nivella (Fabricius) Shibuya 1928 Tinea nivella Fabricius 1794; Zimsen 1964 White rice borer Yellow tipped pyralid 2.5. Diagnostic Notes **Identification is currently undergoing peer review as part of the National Diagnostic Protocols by SPHDS.** This species is the same moth as the Australian species, Scirpophaga chrysorrhoa which is present in Northern Australia, south along Queensland and along the eastern coast to northern New South Wales. Light trapping is continually being conducted throughout the Northern Territory to definitively diagnose the presence and extent of establishment. Additional data will be added to the protocol as it becomes available. Young larvae chew through to the main vein of a new folded leaf within the central whorl and cause a transverse row of small holes in the leaf surface. Older larvae tunnel to the growing point and into the internodes. A brown line and yellowy marks form on the underside of leaves even well after the moth has emerged. The tunnelling ends above the ground and runs almost to the epidermis where pupation occurs (Kalshoven 1981). **Egg** laid in masses of 6-30 usually on the underside of leaves near the main vein and can be concealed by scales and hairs. **Larvae** young larvae are brownish yellow and become whiter in colour as they age. Dorsally a red blood vessel line is seen medially and the brown cervical sclerite has a white median line. **Pupae** the pupa is yellow in a silk cocoon and pupates near the epidermis. &#9794 ocherous, labial palpus about 1.3 x diameter of eye; forewing ocherous with 4 fuscous spots, 3 on submedian fold & 1 at lower angle of cell, an oblique irregular fuscous line extends inwards from costa near apex to spot 3 on fold, series of small fuscous dots along termen, underside fuscous; hindwing whitish, costal area and basal half ocherous, underside ocherous in basal half. &#9792 usually white sometimes upperside of forewing suffused with pale ochreous; frenulum 2 bristles; anal tuft ochreous yellow. **Genitalia** &#9794 subteguminal process large, flattened with sinuous margin; valva rather elongate, apex more or less pointed posteriorly; aedeagus slightly swollen in apical 4th; vesica with coarse spines, 1 slender and 2 unequal long based cornuti present. &#9792 ostium bursae broad, membranous, wrinkled and lined with minute spines; ductus bursae with 2 forms of sclerotization (Bleszynski 1970). **Coming soon - PBT link** 2.6. References Ahmad, I (1989) Systematic position of yellow and white paddy stemborers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Schoenobiinae) with special reference to their biology, nature of damage and control strategies. Proceedings of Pakistan Congress of Zoology, No. 9:217-227. Armstrong, K. (2010) DNA barcoding: a new module in New Zealand’s plant biosecurity diagnostic toolbox. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 40: 91-100. Arora, G.S. (2000) Studies on some Indian Pyralid species of economic importance, Part I. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 181, ZSI, Calcutta. Butani, D.K. (1956) A key for the identification of sugarcane borers. Indian Journal Entomology. 18 (3) 303-304. Cho, S., Mitchell, A., Mitter, C., Regier, J., Matthews, M., Robertson, R. (2008). Molecular phylogenetics of heliothine moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae), with comments on the evolution of host range and pest status. Systematic Entomology. 33: 581-594. Common, I.F.B. (1960) A revision of the Australian stem borers hitherto referred to Schoenobius and Scirpophaga (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Schoenobiinae). Australian Journal of Zoology 8, 307.347. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology., 3(5): 294-299. Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N. (2006). DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103(4): 968-971. Hanner, R. (2005). Proposed standards for BARCODE records in INSDC (BRIs). http://www.barcoding.si.edu/PDF/DWG_data_standards-Final.pdf. Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., deWaard, J.R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B270: 313-321. Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W. (2004). Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101(41): 14812-14817. Inoue H, Sugi S, Kuroko H, Moriuti S, & Kawabe A. (1982). Moths of Japan. Kyodo Printing Co, Ltd. Tokyo. Vol. II 552 pp. Kalshoven, L.G.E, Laan Pavan der (1981) Pests of crops in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Ichtiar Baru. Kumar, R. (2001). Insect Pests of Agriculture in Papua New Guinea, Part 1. Principles and Practice Pests of Tree Crops and Stored Products. Science in New Guinea. Lewvanich, A. (1981). A revision of the Old World species of Scirpophaga (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae). Bulletin of the British Museum Natural History (Entomology), 42, 185-298. Martin, E.L. (1958). Notes on some rice stem borers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), with the description of a new species of Chilo Zincken. Bulletin of Entomological Research 49:187-191 Cambridge University Press. Nielsen, E.S, Edwards, E.D & Rangsi, T.V0 (eds) (1996). Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera. Checklist of the Lepidoptera of Australia, CSIRO Canberra. Samoedi, D. (1995). Yield losses of commercial cane varieties due to infestation of white top moth borer, Tryporyza nivella intact Sn. In Java. Proceedings ISSCT. Solis, M.A. (2007). Phylogenetic studies and modern classification of the Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera). Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 33 (1): 1-9. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Waterhouse, D.F. (1993). The Major Arthropod pests and weeds of agriculture in Southeast Asia: Distribution, Importance and Origin. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, 141pp. Wilson, J.J. (2010). Assessing the value of DNA barcodes and other priority gene regions for molecular phylogenetics of Lepidoptera. PLoS. 5(5):e10525. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010525. 3. Diagnostic Images ANIC ANIC P1 male Adult female: S. Anderson DAFF Biosecurity Adult male: S. Anderson DAFF Biosecurity ANIC P1 aedeagus ANIC Aedeagus: S. Anderson DAFF Biosecurity Female anal tuft: S. Anderson DAFF Biosecurity ANIC P136 female S. Eyres (Imaging Consultant) Female genitalia: S. Anderson DAFF Larva in stem: S. Eyres Department of Biosecurity Agriculture WA ANIC P99 male ANIC P1 Male genitalia: S. Anderson DAFF Male wings: S. Anderson DAFF Biosecurity Biosecurity Results Generated: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Schoenobius Maximellus (Pyralididae)
    234 Vo1.17: no.4 CONTRIBUTION TO THE LIFE HISTORY OF SCHOENOBIUS MAXIMELLUS (PYRALIDIDAE) by A. BLANCHARD In WM. T. M. FORBES' "The Lepidoptera of New York and Neighboring States" (part 1: 525; 1923), there is a note which reads in part: "The Schoenobiinae are a small group of more or less aquatic moths . The larvae are hardly known structurally, and are borers in marsh and aquatic plants ..." Of the genus Schoenobius, the same author says that it is a very difficult one in the South, and is not well understood. Of Schoenobius maximellus Fernald, he states "male unknown." When I sent some specimens for identification to the United States National M usoum, I was told that this institution had no males in its collection. I have, by sheer luck, found one food plant of this species and observed many larvae and males, and I hope that the following biological notes will be of interest. All around Don George Lake (ten miles southeast of Richmond, FOlt Bend County, Texas) grows a tall, coarse Gramineae: Zizaniopsis miliacea (Michx.) Doell & Aschers (or Southern Wild Rice). I have seen the same plant in a few other places (Huntsville State Park, Freeport, Rosenberg, Welder Wildlife Foundation), but nowhere as abundant as it is around Don George Lake, where it has practically crowded out all other plants, at least along the southern shore. The larva of Schoenobius maximellus bores vertically along the axis of this plant, in the leaves, and even penetrates several millimeters into the hard crown. I have always found it head down at the bottom of its burrow, except when it is ready to pupatc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the New World Species of Donacaula Meyrick and a Phylogenetic Analysis of Related Schoenobiinae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2010 A Revision Of The New World Species Of Donacaula Meyrick And A Phylogenetic Analysis Of Related Schoenobiinae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Edda Lis Martinez Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Martinez, Edda Lis, "A Revision Of The New World Species Of Donacaula Meyrick And A Phylogenetic Analysis Of Related Schoenobiinae (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)" (2010). Theses and Dissertations. 248. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/248 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD SPECIES OF DONACAULA MEYRICK AND A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF RELATED SCHOENOBIINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) By Edda Lis Martínez A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology in the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Mississippi State, Mississippi December 2010 A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD SPECIES OF DONACAULA MEYRICK AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF RELATED SCHOENOBIINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) By Edda Lis Martínez Approved: ______________________________ ______________________________ Richard
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from BOLD Or Requested from Other Authors
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifcations of lepidopteran Received: 28 November 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2019 stemborers, with an emphasis on Published: xx xx xxxx sugarcane pests Timothy R. C. Lee 1, Stacey J. Anderson2, Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen3, Nader Sallam4, Bruno P. Le Ru5,6, Desmond Conlong7,8, Kevin Powell 9, Andrew Ward10 & Andrew Mitchell1 Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world’s most prolifc crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity eforts are hampered by the difculty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identifed in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the efectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecifc diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identifed 24 instances of identifcation errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identifcation using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confrm species boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation of Larval Instars in Field Populations of Rice Yellow Stem Borer, Scirpophaga Incertulas (Walk.)
    Oryza Vol. 50 No.3, 2013 (259-267) Delineation of larval instars in field populations of rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walk.) AP Padmakumari*, G Katti, V Sailaja, Ch Padmavathi, V Jhansi Lakshmi, M Prabhakar1 and YG Prasad1 Directorate of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad -500 030 1Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad -500 059 Email : [email protected] ABSTRACT Delineation of larval instars of an insect is important in morphological and physiological studies. We applied Dyar’s rule to morphometric measurements of larval instars from field populations of the yellow stem borer (YSB), Scirpophaga incertulas (Walk.) collected on two paddy cultivars over three seasons. The conventional head capsule width (HCW) measurement was compared with mandibular width (MW) of larvae from both field and laboratory populations. Frequency distribution of HCW showed seven peaks with size overlaps indicating seven instars in field populations. Distinct size classes were observed in MW with means of 0.042, 0.083, 0.125, 0.166, 0.208, 0.250 and 0.291 mm for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th instars, respectively, in the field population. However, size classes fell into five instars from HCW and MW measurements of larvae reared on cut paddy stems under constant temperature (25 ± 1°C) and humidity (60± 5%) indicating two additional, late larval instars under variable field conditions. For the same instar, mean HCW size slightly varied and was overlapping while mean MW size was identical between field and laboratory populations for each of the first five common larval instars. Key words: Dyar's rule, mandibular width, rice, yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Rice is one of the most important staple food crops in resulted a grain loss of 108, 174 and 278 kg ha-1, the world, with China and India being the lead producing respectively (Muralidharan and Pasalu, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2018, 419, 42 Knowledge & © K. Pabis, Published by EDP Sciences 2018 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018030 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema REVIEW PAPER What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera Krzysztof Pabis* Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland Abstract – This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165,000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios. Keywords: Lepidoptera / Acentropinae / caterpillars / freshwater / herbivory Résumé – Que fait une mite sous l'eau? Écologie des lépidoptères aquatiques et semi-aquatiques. Cet article passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur l'écologie des mites aquatiques et semi-aquatiques, et discute des pré-adaptations possibles des mites au milieu aquatique.
    [Show full text]
  • That Are N O Ttuurito
    THAT AREN O US009802899B2TTUURITO ( 12) United States Patent (10 ) Patent No. : US 9 ,802 , 899 B2 Heilmann et al. ( 45 ) Date of Patent: Oct . 31, 2017 ( 54 ) HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS CO7D 401/ 12 ( 2006 .01 ) PESTICIDES C07D 403 /04 (2006 .01 ) CO7D 405 / 12 (2006 . 01) (71 ) Applicant : BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG , C07D 409 / 12 ( 2006 .01 ) Monheim (DE ) C070 417 / 12 (2006 . 01) (72 ) Inventors: Eike Kevin Heilmann , Duesseldorf AOIN 43 /60 ( 2006 .01 ) (DE ) ; Joerg Greul , Leverkusen (DE ) ; AOIN 43 /653 (2006 . 01 ) Axel Trautwein , Duesseldorf (DE ) ; C07D 249 /06 ( 2006 . 01 ) Hans- Georg Schwarz , Dorsten (DE ) ; (52 ) U . S . CI. Isabelle Adelt , Haan (DE ) ; Roland CPC . .. C07D 231/ 40 (2013 . 01 ) ; AOIN 43 / 56 Andree , Langenfeld (DE ) ; Peter ( 2013 .01 ) ; A01N 43 /58 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; AOIN Luemmen , Idstein (DE ) ; Maike Hink , 43 /60 (2013 .01 ) ; AOIN 43 /647 ( 2013 .01 ) ; Markgroeningen (DE ); Martin AOIN 43 /653 ( 2013 .01 ) ; AOIN 43 / 76 Adamczewski , Cologne (DE ) ; Mark ( 2013 .01 ) ; A01N 43 / 78 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A01N Drewes, Langenfeld ( DE ) ; Angela 43/ 82 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 231/ 06 (2013 . 01 ) ; Becker , Duesseldorf (DE ) ; Arnd C07D 231 /22 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 231/ 52 Voerste , Cologne (DE ) ; Ulrich ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 231/ 56 (2013 .01 ) ; C07D Goergens, Ratingen (DE ) ; Kerstin Ilg , 249 /06 (2013 . 01 ) ; C07D 401 /04 ( 2013 .01 ) ; Cologne (DE ) ; Johannes -Rudolf CO7D 401/ 12 ( 2013 . 01) ; C07D 403 / 04 Jansen , Monheim (DE ) ; Daniela Portz , (2013 . 01 ) ; C07D 403 / 12 ( 2013 . 01) ; C07D Vettweiss (DE ) 405 / 12 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 409 / 12 ( 2013 .01 ) ; C07D 417 / 12 ( 2013 .01 ) ( 73 ) Assignee : BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG , (58 ) Field of Classification Search Monheim ( DE ) ??? .
    [Show full text]
  • Some New Records of Parasites of Rice Stem-Borers in India*
    SOME NEW RECORDS OF PARASITES OF RICE STEM-BORERS IN INDIA* BY V. P. RAO, F.A.Sc., A. N. BASU, V. R. PHALAK, M. J. CHACKO AND H. DrN~H I~0 (Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Indian Station, Bangalore, India) Received May 21, 1968 ABSTRACT The authors have recorded several parasites of paddy stem-borers in India, some of which were not known previously from this country while many others were known earlier only from other hosts. Some species of parasites recorded here are. new to science. The new records mentioned include, Goniozus indicus and Perisierola sp. (Hym. : Bethylidae), Elasmus sp. and E. albopictus (Hym. : Elasmid~e), Tetrastichus ayyari (Hym. : Eulophidae) ; ? Dicopulus sp. (Hym.: Myma- ridae) ; Gen. nr. Habrocytus (Hym. : Pteromalidae) ; Trichogramma japo- nicum, T. sp. (not minutum), Trichogramma sp. (Hym. : Trichogramma- tidae); Chelonus sp. 1, Chelonus sp. 2, Meteorus ? unicolor, Orgilus sp., Rhaconotus schoenobivorus, R. signipennis (Hym. : Braconidae); Amauro- morpha accepta accepta, A. ?metathoracica, Apsilops sp., lsotima sp., Gen. et sp. indet. (Phaeogenini), Gen. et sp. indet. (Pimplini), Temelucha pestifer, T. sp. nr. pestifer, Temelucha sp. 1 and Temelucha sp. 2 (Hym. : Ichneumonid~e); Telenomus dignus, T. rowani, T. sp. nr. rowani and T. (Aholcus) sp. (Hym. : Scelionidae) on Tryporyza incertulas ; Trichospilus diatraeae (Hym. : Eulophidae), Apanteles pallipes and Tropobracon schoenobii (Hym. : Braconidae); Anilastus sp., Gen. et sp. indet. (Campo- plegini), Coccygomimus laothob" and Devorgilla sp. (Hym. : Ichneumonidae) on Sesamia inferens; Apanteles baoris, R. signipennis and T. schoenobff (Hym. : Braconidae); A. a. schoenobii, Centeterus alternecoloratus var. ?, Gen. et sp. indet. (Pimplinae), Pristo~nerus sp. and Temelucha sp. nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Study of a Sugarcane Pest, Tryporyza (Scirpophaga) Nivella Fab (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
    Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences ISSN: 2231-6345 (Online) An Online International Journal Available at http://www.cibtech.org/jls.htm 2013 Vol. 3 (1) January-March, pp.6-8/Kumar and Rana Research Article MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF A SUGARCANE PEST, TRYPORYZA (SCIRPOPHAGA) NIVELLA FAB (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) *Praveen Kumar and K.S. Rana Department of Zoology, Agra College, Agra (U.P.) India *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a major cash crop of India. Production of Sugarcane is heavily decreased by the attack of insect pests in India. T. nivella is one of the serious pest of sugarcane which reduces the cane production in great quantity as well as in quality. For the morphological study of selected pest in laboratory, adults were collected from all selected sugarcane fields during the experimental year from April, 2011 to March, 2012 and then, they were released in net house of selected field in village-Nagla Kalua of District Etah (UP) in natural conditions. All morphological observations were recorded closely in natural condition with the help of Hand lens (Steriomicroscope and camera Lucida in laboratory). Males were silvery white in colour, 2.54 to 3.14 mm in length while females were crimson white in colour, 2.24 mm to 3.09 in length. Antennae were filiform type, 11 segmented and 3.0 mm mm long. Eggs were oval in shape, white in colour, 1.2 mm long and 1.0 wide in size. The prothorax was evident but compressed and reduced. The mesothorax was the largest and most prominent segment of the thorax.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Screening of Sugarcane Varieties Against the Different Broods of T. Nivella
    © 2020 JETIR October 2020, Volume 7, Issue 10 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) STUDY ON THE SCREENING OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES AGAINST THE DIFFERENT BROODS OF T. NIVELLA Dr. Anita Kumari, Assistant Professor Dept. of Zoology, L. S. College Muzaffarpur Abstract Sugarcane is an agro - industrial crop and cultivation spread over a wide range of agro – ecological zone of India. The mature stalk is typically composed of 11 – 16 % fiber, 12 – 16 % soluble sugars, 2 – 3 % non – sugars and 63 – 73 % water. A sugarcane crop is sensitive to the climate, soil type, irrigation, fertilizers, insects, diseases control, varieties and the harvest period. The average yield of cane stalk is 60 – 70 tons per hectare per year. It varies between 20 and 180 tons per hectare per year depending on crop management approach. The long duration crop is attracted by T. nivella F., a notorious pest, which causes dead – heart disease to the plant. 24 varieties of sugarcane were screened and reveal that third and fourth brood showed minimum infestation while CoP 7104 and CoP 9103 were tolerant to the third and forth brood of the top borer. In September all the varieties registered maximum infestation. Yield loss due to infestation by different broods also confirms the above finding in different varieties. Keywords: Agro – industrial, infestation, T. nivella, CoP 7104 and CoP 9103 Sugarcane is the world’s largest crop by production quantity. In 2012, FAQ estimates it was cultivated on about 160 million hectares in more than 90 countries, with a worldwide harvest of 18.3 billion tons. Brazil was the largest producer of sugarcane in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microlepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 8-1-1983 TB109: A List of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae Through Cossidae Auburn E. Brower Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Brower, A.E. 1983. A list of the Lepidoptera of Maine--Part 2: The icrM olepidoptera Section 1 Limacodidae through Cossidae. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 109. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section I LIMACODIDAE THROUGH COSSIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY. ORONO Maine Agricultural Experiment Station August 198! Representatives of the Diverse Groups of Included Microlepidoptera 1 Slug moth 2 Pyralid moth 3 Argyrid moth 4 Plume moth 5 Bell moth 6 Cosmopterygid moth 7 Gelechiid moth 8 Ethmiid moth 9 Gracilariid moth 10 Glyphipterygid moth 11 Aegeriid moth Inquiries regarding this bulletin may be sent to: Dr. Auburn E. Brower 8 Hospital Street Augusta, Maine 04330 A LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF MAINE Part 2 THE MICROLEPIDOPTERA Section I LIMACODIDAE THROUGH COSSIDAE Auburn E. Brower A JOINT PUBLICATION OF THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Maine Forest Service Division of Entomology, Augusta, Maine and the DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio2 Ch01-Wilson
    CHAPTER 1 Introduction EDWARD O. WILSON Pellegrino University Professor, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts “Biodiversity,” the term and concept, has been a remarkable event in recent cultural evolution: 10 years ago the word did not exist, except perhaps through occasional idiosyncratic use. Today it is one of the most commonly used expres- sions in the biological sciences and subsequently has become a household word. It was born “BioDiversity” during the National Forum on BioDiversity, held in Washington, D.C., on September 21-24, 1986, under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences and the Smithsonian Institution. The proceedings of the forum, published in 1988 under the title BioDiversity (later to be cited with less than bibliographical accuracy by most authors as Biodiversity), became a best- seller for the National Academy Press. By the summer of 1992, as a key topic of the Rio environmental summit meeting, biodiversity had moved to center stage as one of the central issues of scientific and political concern world-wide. So what is it? Biologists are inclined to agree that it is, in one sense, every- thing. Biodiversity is defined as all hereditarily based variation at all levels of organization, from the genes within a single local population or species, to the species composing all or part of a local community, and finally to the communi- ties themselves that compose the living parts of the multifarious ecosystems of the world. The key to the effective analysis of biodiversity is the precise defini- tion of each level of organization when it is being addressed.
    [Show full text]