Appendix 1. Virchow's Last Year

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 1. Virchow's Last Year Appendix 1. Virchow’s last year 1a. The celebration of Rudolph Virchow’s 80th Birthday A personal impression by Sir Felix Semon, Berlin, October 13th, 1901 With additional comments by other correspondents. The British Medical Journal ii, October 19th: 1180–1182 (1901) “COMMON admiration for great and good men draws nations together, and common pursuit of noble and scientific objects makes a brotherhood of intellec- tual interest.” These warm-hearted words from Dr. Pye-Smith’s contribution towards the international “Virchow Number” of the Berliner klinische Wochen- schrift may fitly be taken as giving the keynote to the days through which we are living at the present moment. Unique as the man, in whose honour we are assem- bled here, are the celebrations on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, which a kind fate has permitted him to see in full and undimmed vigour of mind and body. From almost every European country, from America, from Japan, have representatives of all the manifold interests with which Virchow’s name has been and for ever will be connected, hurried to Berlin to “lay their wreaths at the great pathologist’s feet,” foremost amongst them, it need hardly be said, members of that profession which, without difference of nationality, looks upon him as its brightest, proudest ornament. It would be impossible for me, not having the offi- cial list of guests at my command, to enumerate all the distinguished guests and delegates who have flocked to Berlin. Suffice it to say that, besides representatives of all the German universities, societies, learned bodies, municipal corporations, Great Britain and Ireland are represented by Lord Lister (Royal Society and numerous other institutions), Sir Felix Semon (Royal College of Physicians), Mr. Howard Marsh (Royal College of Surgeons), Dr. Rose Bradford (Royal Medical and Chirurgical Society), Mr. Watson Cheyne (Pathological Society), Professor Muir (University of Glasgow), and Dr. Graham Brown (Royal College of Physi- cians of Edinburgh); France by Professor Cornil; Italy by His Excellency Professor Baccelli, Minister of Agriculture, and by Professor Maragliane; the Nether- lands by Professor Stokvis;Austria by Professors Toldt,Weichselbaum, and var- ious other delegates; Denmark by Professor Salomonsen; Norway by Professor Armauer Hansen; Switzerland by Professor Ruge; Russia by Professor von 251 Appendix 1. Virchow’s last year Raptschewski and several other men of science. In fact, there is hardly a single country which has not sent one or several representatives. The festivities were ushered in by a dinner on Friday evening, given by Pro- fessor Posner, one of the editors of the Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, which was of an absolutely international character.The hostess sat between Lord Lister and Professor Baccelli, next to whom in turn were placed Virchow himself and Professor von Leyden, whilst opposite were the Rector of Berlin University and Professor Gerhardt.Then followed, harmoniously mixed, a profusion of medical talent of all countries. The host, in a polyglot speech, drank to the health of all his guests, and Professor Baccelli most felicitously replied:“To the Queen of the Banquet, to the Emperor of Pathology, to the Senate of Science”. Lord Lister toasted host and hostess, and the Rector of Berlin University, Professor Hart- nack, the absent Mrs.Virchow.This brought Virchow himself to his feet, and we enjoyed the somewhat unusual pleasure of his proposing the health of a dignity of the Church. (Professor Hartnack is a Professor of Theology.) It was late before the company separated, soon to assemble again at the Hotel Bristol, where at an informal meeting under Professor Waldeyer’s presidency all arrangements were made for the official celebration. The latter from beginning to end was so extraordinary of its kind, that as yet but three things stand out prominently from the kaleidoscopic impressions which overwhelmed us yesterday: the conviction that surely never before had a richer life been lived than Virchow’s, the joy and gladness that on the evening of such a life the achievements of this unique man are universally acknowledged with- out a single dissentient voice being heard, the thankfulness that such a man should have been spared to the world in such astonishing vigour of mind and body as this “Grand Old Man of Science”. For to begin with the last-named fact, surely it was astonishing that in the morning this octogenarian should have on the eve of his eightieth birthday treated the audience, which he had invited to his pathological museum, the pride and the joy of his old age, to a wonderful retrospect of the past, and a sketch of the future of pathology, made in a speech of one and a-half hour’s duration, a speech made without notes, should have sat through and have made at a two hours’ dinner in the evening one of the most felicitous and humorous dinner speeches ever heard, and should after this have listened and replied – standing almost the whole time – to speech-making, which lasted from 9.30 to 12.30 p.m. without any interruption, saying a kind word or two to almost everybody who had come to do him honour. But to remain in order and do my duty as faithful chronicler of events. At noon yesterday (Saturday) a most distinguished audience thronged, on the “Jubilar’s” own invitation, the amphitheatre of his museum. Secretaries of State, representatives of the German Army Medical Service, all his professorial col- leagues, delegates from every civilised country, former assistants, now great men themselves, and pupils galore sat, as of old, at the master’s feet and listened spellbound to his broad-minded, philosophical statements concerning the mean- 252 1a. The celebration of Rudolph Virchow’s 80th Birthday ing of the word “pathology”, to his historical description of the development of his science, to his spirited defence of the views which he has unwaveringly held throughout his long life, to the sketch of the aims which he hopes will be stead- fastly followed in his Institut, even when his strong hand – absit omen – should no longer guide it. It was a wonderful feat, and we all felt we had been privi- leged to be present at a historical occasion. At the end of Virchow’s oration, Surgeon – General Schäfer, the head of the Charité Hospital, with which the Pathological Institute is connected, expressed to him in warm, well-chosen words the thanks of the authorities of the hospital, and in conclusion our great teacher gave a demonstration of a series of beautiful photomicrographs of animal and vegetable parasites thrown upon a screen.After this the audience dispersed to admire the treasures of the museum, brought together and arranged with never – resting industry mainly by himself. But if the morning was most interesting it was surpassed by the evening. At 6 P.M. a company of 200, including Virchow’s family, sat down to dinner in the Festraum of the beautiful new abode of the Prussian House of Commons. From amongst the numerous speeches made I single out for special mention the heartfelt words of three hale and hearty contemporaries of Virchow’s, Drs. Körte, Langerhans, and Meyer, who told us of their recollections of “young” Virchow, who testified to the influence he had exercised upon their develop- ment, who praised him as a husband, a father, a lover of his domestic pets. And most interesting in the same connection was the speech made by Privy Coun- cillore1 Althoff, who had unearthed from the archives of the Cultus–Minis- terium,Virchow’s application for matriculation, dated Easter, 1839, the German essay he wrote on this occasion, entitled, “A Life Full of Work and Labour is no Burden but an Enjoyment”, and the report he received after examination. The latter, Dr. Althoff stated, was “somewhat monotonous”, there being no other terms in it than “excellent”, “very good”, “most satisfactory”. Even in “singing” he had satisfied his masters! It was a charming idea of the speaker’s to have had the two first-named documents reprinted, adorned by a portrait of the “Jubilar” at the age of 6 (!), which already foreshadows the massive fore- head and the penetrating eyes of the future man (although the nose, he humor- ously observed, had since been improving), and to distribute the whole under the title “Little Virchow” amongst the company. After dinner we all adjourned to the imposing meeting room of the Prussian House of Commons, where meanwhile a large and distinguished company, in- cluding many ladies in brilliant toilettes, had assembled, and now the ceremony proper of the occasion began. It was a never-to-be-forgotten picture.The whole scientific world had assembled it seemed to do honour to one man. A never- ending stream of bearers of the most illustrious names, decked with glittering stars and decorations, clad in the picturesque uniforms of many nations, bear- ing addresses, medals, pictures executed in Virchow’s honour, passed our dear old master, who for once in his life had donned his own high decorations, and 253 Appendix 1. Virchow’s last year who stood there erect, modestly listening to every word said in his praise, a tower of intellectual strength, and yet with a kind smile on his lips, a warm word, a firm shake of his hand for everybody who had come to congratulate him. It was a marvellous, an unforgettable sight! How much must this man, long though his life has been, have done, that the whole world should thus have united to do him honour! That thought, I believe, must have impressed itself with ever-increasing force, upon every witness of this imposing ceremony; that thought prevented it, in spite of its length, from ever becoming tedious; that thought filled us all with ever-growing respect and admiration for this unique man, as deputation after deputation passed and testified to what Vir- chow had been to them, what he had done for them.
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF Rudolf Virchow, the Founder of Cellular Pathology
    Rom J Morphol Embryol 2019, 60(4):1381–1382 R J M E HORT ISTORICAL EVIEW Romanian Journal of S H R Morphology & Embryology http://www.rjme.ro/ Rudolf Virchow, the founder of cellular pathology DOMENICO RIBATTI Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy Abstract The cell theory was firstly formulated by Schleiden, Schwann, and Virchow. They sustained that the cells originate from pre-existing cells and that the living organisms are composed by cells organized in different tissues. In particular, Virchow not only established the principle of omnis cellula e cellula, but considered for the first time that alterations on cell organization was at the basis of disease. Keywords: cell theory, cellular pathology, history of medicine. Background was responsible for many social, sanitary, and medical reforms, and opposed Otto Bismarck when became Prime Rudolf Ludwig Karl Virchow (Figure 1) was born on Minister. In 1861, he was elected to the Prussian Diet. October 13, 1821, in Schievelbein. He studied medicine Virchow’s career in social medicine was equally remarkable. at Friedrich-Wilhelms Institut in Berlin and his mentors Virchow died in Berlin on September 5, 1902. were Johannes Müller and Johann Schönlein. In 1843, Virchow received his medical degree and was appointed Omnis cellula e cellula prosector at the Charité Hospital in Berlin. In 1847, Virchow with Benno Reinhardt founded a new Journal, Die Cellularpathologie in ihrer Begründung auf Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und physiologische und pathologische Gewebelehre [1] appeared für klinische Medizin, later knows as Virchows Archiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Invasions, Insurgency and Interventions: Sweden’s Wars in Poland, Prussia and Denmark 1654 - 1658. A Dissertation Presented by Christopher Adam Gennari to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University May 2010 Copyright by Christopher Adam Gennari 2010 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Christopher Adam Gennari We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Ian Roxborough – Dissertation Advisor, Professor, Department of Sociology. Michael Barnhart - Chairperson of Defense, Distinguished Teaching Professor, Department of History. Gary Marker, Professor, Department of History. Alix Cooper, Associate Professor, Department of History. Daniel Levy, Department of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook. This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School """"""""" """"""""""Lawrence Martin "" """""""Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Invasions, Insurgency and Intervention: Sweden’s Wars in Poland, Prussia and Denmark. by Christopher Adam Gennari Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University 2010 "In 1655 Sweden was the premier military power in northern Europe. When Sweden invaded Poland, in June 1655, it went to war with an army which reflected not only the state’s military and cultural strengths but also its fiscal weaknesses. During 1655 the Swedes won great successes in Poland and captured most of the country. But a series of military decisions transformed the Swedish army from a concentrated, combined-arms force into a mobile but widely dispersed force.
    [Show full text]
  • Istituto Tecnico Tecnologico Baracca Kaszubskie Liceum
    ONLINE EXCHANGE BRESCIA & BRUSY Istituto Tecnico Tecnologico Baracca Kaszubskie Liceum Ogólnokształcące w Brusach 2021 Elisa Lacagnina Thanks to the Etwinning platform I had the possibility to know Ms. Alicja Frymark, English teacher from Kashubian Secondary School (Kaszubskie Liceum Ogólnokształcące) in Brusy, Poland. Since our first online meeting on Skype, we have kept talking, most of all, of our school project called “Online exchange - Brescia & Brusy”. To start, we decided to assign our students a partner to make them work in pairs. Their task was to exchange emails with their friend about the topic given and then, with the information, to write a short article in English. We assigned different topics like Covid 19 and lockdown; traditional food; language uses; interesting facts about the city, the country and the region; school; local tradition. The first part of the project went really well and I was satisfied with the work done. My 5th-year students are enthusiastic about having a “virtual” foreign partner. I decided to start an online exchange because my students felt the need to improve their English speaking and writing skills, as we have only 3 hour English a week. According to me, these opportunities are not only useful to improve the language skills but also to expand your knowledge, to meet new people, to know about the uses and the customs of different countries. Moreover, it was the right moment to start a project of this kind precisely in this difficult period. We have been experiencing a different life, due to Covid 19 home–schooling, restrictions, curfews, prohibitions etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oceanographic Achievements of Vito Volterra in Italy and Abroad1
    Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies- Volume 3, Issue 3 – Pages 251-266 The Oceanographic Achievements of Vito Volterra in Italy and Abroad1 By Sandra Linguerri The aim of this paper is to introduce Vito Volterra’s activity as a policy maker in the field of oceanography. In 1908, he was the promoter of the Thalassographic Committee (then in 1910 Royal Italian Thalassographic Committee), a national endeavor for marine research vis-à-vis the industrial world of fisheries, which soon internationalized. Abroad it was affiliated with the International Commission for the Scientific Exploration of the Mediterranean Sea, led by Albert I, Prince of Monaco (1919-1922) and then by Vito Volterra himself (1923-1928).1 Keywords: History, International Commission for the Scientific Exploration of the Mediterranean Sea, Oceanography, Royal Italian Thalassographic Committee, Vito Volterra. Vito Volterra and the Royal Italian Thalassographic Committee Vito Volterra (1860-1940) (Goodstein 2007, Guerraggio and Paoloni 2013, Simili and Paoloni 2008) is generally considered one of the greatest mathematicians of his time. His most important contributions were in functional analysis, mathematical ph‟ scientific activities, rather it will focus on his contribution to talassographic (or oceanographic) studies, and especially on the creation of the Royal Italian Talassographic Committee (Linguerri 2005, Ead 2014). In 1900, after teaching in Pisa and Turin, Volterra was offered a chair in mathematical physics at the University of Rome, where he was invited to give the inaugural lecture for the new academic year entitled Sui tentativi di applicazione delle matematiche alle scienze biologiche e sociali (On the attempts to apply mathematics to the biological and social sciences), which demonstrated his great interest in the application of mathematics to biological sciences and to economic research.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL REMARKS xv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XVI INTRODUCTION XVII PREFACE • 1940 XXIX PREFACE • 1948 XXXIII PREFACE; 1962 XXXV I THE ANCESTORS 1 HEINRICH DOHRN The Posen surgeon. Foundation of a Stettin business. Transition to industry. 1 2 CARL AUGUST DOHRN A natural musical talent. Family conflict. Friendship with A. von Humboldt. Years of traveling. Collection of folksongs. At the Court of Friedrich Wilhelm iv. Spanish plays. Leader of the German entomologists. Parliamentary interlude. Adelheid Dohrn. 5 v http://d-nb.info/910694044 TABLE OF CONTENTS II YOUTH AND DEVELOPMENT I THE SCHOOL YEARS IN STETTIN The spirit of the parents' home. Gymnasium. The sixteen-year-old expert writer. Natural science as his life's goal. 29 z STUDIES Konigsberg. Bonn. His service in the Hussars. Bad luck in his military career. Jena. Friendship with Ernst Haeckel. Berlin. In the circle of Stahr-Lewald. 33 3 JENA, 1866 Awakening through Darwin. Demarcation against Haeckel. Political radicalism. Position in the German question. 44 4 FRIEDRICH ALBERT LANGE A reprimanded teacher. Farewell to materialism. Turning to Kant. Socioeconomic studies. 51 5 THE ROAD TO BECOMING A PROFESSOR Haeckel's General Morphology. Should Dohrn go to Hamburg? First English impressions. Robertson and Huxley. The friends in Jena. Ernst Abbe. »Habilitation«. A collapse. Examining the scientific position. 57 6 MESSINA The transportable aquarium. On the Sicilian coast. The family G. I. von Baranowski. VI 74 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 IN THE MIDST OF DECISIONS Teaching activity in Jena. History of the crayfish family. Darwinism and psychology. Friendship with Carl Vogt. 80 III THE DARING EXPERIMENT 1 THE GROWTH OF THE NAPLES PLAN Opposition of the father.
    [Show full text]
  • Poli Sh Genealogcal Soci Ettq of Mlrfiesota Newsletteiili
    Poli sh Genealogcal Soci ettq of MlrfiesotA NEWSLETTEIili VOLI.JME 13 WIMER 2005-06 NUMBBR 4 A Survivor's Guide to Finding Ancestors in Poland: My experience in researching the M AG DZI ARZ| LAB AK fami I i e s from Pilzno, Galicia through Chicago to Sturgeon Lake, MN By Mark Dobosenski [email protected]> All of us have had to start somewhere in our search for nm our ancestors originating in Poland--but where do we begin? this issue " . " How does one go about this grurd scavenger hunt? WtritE A Survivor's Guide to Finding there are many rcsources available online and in printed form Ancestors in Poland......................p. 1 (some of which will be noted for you ro try), I thought it might be helpful to document my search for my wife's ancestors. President's Letter........ ........2 I used to ask many questions of my father-in-law, fhe late The Bulletin Board............................... 3 Frank MAGDZIARZ, of Sturgeon Lake, MN. Sometime Letters to the editor........ .......................4 after Dianne and I were married and I became interested in Where is ?inovrocwa? qagTg both my and my wife's family hisrories. Maybe having Pommem? Pomorze? Kaszuby? children brought that urge to mind? Nonetheless, Frank had a great mind for relationships! Group Tour to Poland.......................5 Marcinkiewicz of Little Falls Well, the first step in beginning one's family history re- DNA Genealogy search is to ask questions: check with living family members Polish Churches of the Archdiocese of and record your information down in eithera notebook or St.
    [Show full text]
  • On the First Electromagnetic Measurement of the Velocity of Light by Wilhelm Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch
    Andre Koch Torres Assis On the First Electromagnetic Measurement of the Velocity of Light by Wilhelm Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch Abstract The electrostatic, electrodynamic and electromagnetic systems of units utilized during last century by Ampère, Gauss, Weber, Maxwell and all the others are analyzed. It is shown how the constant c was introduced in physics by Weber's force of 1846. It is shown that it has the unit of velocity and is the ratio of the electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge. Weber and Kohlrausch's experiment of 1855 to determine c is quoted, emphasizing that they were the first to measure this quantity and obtained the same value as that of light velocity in vacuum. It is shown how Kirchhoff in 1857 and Weber (1857-64) independently of one another obtained the fact that an electromagnetic signal propagates at light velocity along a thin wire of negligible resistivity. They obtained the telegraphy equation utilizing Weber’s action at a distance force. This was accomplished before the development of Maxwell’s electromagnetic theory of light and before Heaviside’s work. 1. Introduction In this work the introduction of the constant c in electromagnetism by Wilhelm Weber in 1846 is analyzed. It is the ratio of electromagnetic and electrostatic units of charge, one of the most fundamental constants of nature. The meaning of this constant is discussed, the first measurement performed by Weber and Kohlrausch in 1855, and the derivation of the telegraphy equation by Kirchhoff and Weber in 1857. Initially the basic systems of units utilized during last century for describing electromagnetic quantities is presented, along with a short review of Weber’s electrodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Weberˇs Planetary Model of the Atom
    Weber’s Planetary Model of the Atom Bearbeitet von Andre Koch Torres Assis, Gudrun Wolfschmidt, Karl Heinrich Wiederkehr 1. Auflage 2011. Taschenbuch. 184 S. Paperback ISBN 978 3 8424 0241 6 Format (B x L): 17 x 22 cm Weitere Fachgebiete > Physik, Astronomie > Physik Allgemein schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Weber’s Planetary Model of the Atom Figure 0.1: Wilhelm Eduard Weber (1804–1891) Foto: Gudrun Wolfschmidt in der Sternwarte in Göttingen 2 Nuncius Hamburgensis Beiträge zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften Band 19 Andre Koch Torres Assis, Karl Heinrich Wiederkehr and Gudrun Wolfschmidt Weber’s Planetary Model of the Atom Ed. by Gudrun Wolfschmidt Hamburg: tredition science 2011 Nuncius Hamburgensis Beiträge zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften Hg. von Gudrun Wolfschmidt, Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Mathematik und Technik, Universität Hamburg – ISSN 1610-6164 Diese Reihe „Nuncius Hamburgensis“ wird gefördert von der Hans Schimank-Gedächtnisstiftung. Dieser Titel wurde inspiriert von „Sidereus Nuncius“ und von „Wandsbeker Bote“. Andre Koch Torres Assis, Karl Heinrich Wiederkehr and Gudrun Wolfschmidt: Weber’s Planetary Model of the Atom. Ed. by Gudrun Wolfschmidt. Nuncius Hamburgensis – Beiträge zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Band 19. Hamburg: tredition science 2011. Abbildung auf dem Cover vorne und Titelblatt: Wilhelm Weber (Kohlrausch, F. (Oswalds Klassiker Nr. 142) 1904, Frontispiz) Frontispiz: Wilhelm Weber (1804–1891) (Feyerabend 1933, nach S.
    [Show full text]
  • College of Physicians of Philadelphia Share His Success with Owen, Who
    Book Reviews anatomical and physiological research in Britain, a subject not well explored by historians. Inter alia a reader learns about a host ofother topics including the collection ofresearch materials, the making of specimens for teaching purposes, and medical publishing. One subject on which the letters are somewhat unforthcoming is the correspondents' personalities. Two good friends who feel free to exchange confidential information is as much a sense as we get. I recommend this collection of letters to all interested in nineteenth-century medical teaching and science. Jacyna deserves our gratitude for making this correspondence available and for his care in editing. Caroline Hannaway, Francis C. Wood Institute for the History of Medicine, College of Physicians of Philadelphia SHIRLEY ROBERTS, Sir James Paget: the rise of clinical surgery, Eponymists in Medicine, London, Royal Society of Medicine Services, 1990, 8vo, pp. xi, 223, illus., £12.95, £7.95 (paperback). Sir James Paget (1814-1899) was arguably the most famous medical man of Victorian England. Born in obscurity in Yarmouth, Paget rose to international eminence as a surgeon and medical scientist. He was highly visible in the mid-Victorian years as one of Queen Victoria's surgeons, President of the Royal College of Surgeons, and Vice-Chancellor of London University. He is known today for his classic descriptions of Paget's disease of the bone (osteitis deformans) and Paget's disease of the nipple. Readers hoping to find in this book a study of Sir James Page's surgical and scientific career may be disappointed, for it devotes almost no space to the "clinical surgery" promised in the title.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN HUNTER: SURGEON and NATURALIST* by DOUGLAS GUTHRIE, M.D., F.R.C.S.Ed
    JOHN HUNTER: SURGEON AND NATURALIST* By DOUGLAS GUTHRIE, M.D., F.R.C.S.Ed. " " Why Think ? Why not try the Experiment ? Professor John Chiene,*^ whose apt maxims of surgical practice still ring in the ears of those of us who were fortunate to be his pupils, was wont to advise us to avoid becoming mere " hewers of wood and drawers of water." Such counsel would have delighted John Hunter who, with a vision far ahead of his time, laboured to prevent surgery from becoming an affair of carpentry and plumbing. In the present era of specialism and super-specialism it is indeed salutary to recall this great figure of medical history, and although the work of John Hunter has been the theme of a dozen biographers and nearly a hundred Hunterian Orators, the remarkable story remains of perennial interest. Parentage and Youth John Hunter, the youngest of a family of ten children, was born on 14th February 1728, at the farm of Long Calderwood, some seven miles south-east of Glasgow. His father, already an old man, died when John was ten years old, and he remained in the care of an indulgent mother and appears to have been a " spoiled child." It is indeed remarkable that such a genius, at the age of seventeen, could neither read nor write. But, as is well known, the brilliant schoolboy does not always fulfil the promise of early years, and, conversely, the boy who has no inclination for scholarship may grow to be a clever man. John Hunter was one who blossomed late ; nevertheless his education did progress, although along unusual lines, for in " his own words he wanted to know all about the clouds and the grasses, and why the leaves changed colour in autumn : I watched the ants, bees, birds, tadpoles and caddisworms ; I pestered people with questions about what nobody knew or cared anything about." His sister Janet, eldest of the surviving children, had married a Mr Buchanan, a Glasgow cabinet- maker.
    [Show full text]
  • ''Until the Sun of Science ... the True Apollo of Medicine Has Risen'': Collective Investigation in Britain and America
    Medical History, 2006, 50: 147–166 ‘‘Until the Sun of Science ... the true Apollo of Medicine has risen’’: Collective Investigation in Britain and America, 1880–1910 HARRY M MARKS* In August, 1880, George Murray Humphry, in his presidential address to the British Medical Association (BMA), called for ‘‘collective action’’ by the country’s ‘‘eight thou- sand physicians’’ to accumulate observations concerning the role of ‘‘temperamental, climacteric, and topographical agencies upon disease’’. Through participating in organized inquiries, practitioners would ‘‘deepen their interest in the science of medicine, and impart the charm of wider usefulness to the daily routine of life’’.1 By December 1881, the BMA had funded a Collective Investigation Committee, which over the next eight years would sponsor nearly a dozen inquiries into the natural history of disease.2 Beyond Great Britain, Humphry’s appeal would launch an international movement for collective investigation, with physicians in Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the United States following the British example.3 At first glance, there is little exceptional about the movement for collective investiga- tion. Organized efforts to collect practitioner data on diseases and their treatment go back at least to the eighteenth-century: Fe´lix Vicq d’Azyr led the Socie´te´ Royale de Me´decine in collecting data from French physicians on meteorological conditions and epidemics, while in England John Jurin surveyed correspondents of the Royal Society concerning their experiences with smallpox inoculation.4 The London Medical-Chirurgical Society, the # Harry M Marks 2006 Supplement (25 February): 59–61; Ernest Muirhead Little, History of the British Medical Association, * Harry M Marks, PhD, Institute of the History of 1832–1932, London, British Medical Association, Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, 1900 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Helmholtz's Physiological Psychology1
    Helmholtz’s Physiological Psychology1 Lydia Patton [email protected] In Philosophy of Mind in the Nineteenth Century, ed. S. Lapointe (Routledge, 2018) Author’s copy. Published version available at: https://www.routledge.com/Philosophy-of- Mind-in-the-Nineteenth-Century-The-History-of-the- Philosophy/Lapointe/p/book/9781138243965 Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894) contributed two major works to the theory of sensation and perception in the nineteenth century. The first edition of the The Doctrine of the Sensations of Tone was published in 1863, and the first edition of the Handbook of Physiological Optics was published in toto in 1867. These works established results both controversial and enduring: Helmholtz’s analysis of mixed colors and of combination tones, his arguments against nativism, and his commitment to analyzing sensation and perception using the techniques of natural science, especially physiology and physics. This study will focus on the Physiological Optics (hereafter PO), and on Helmholtz’s account of sensation, perception, and representation via “physiological psychology”. Helmholtz emphasized that external stimuli of sensations are causes, and sensations are their effects, and he had a practical and naturalist orientation toward the analysis of phenomenal experience. 1 Above all, I would like to thank Sandra Lapointe for her insight into the configuration and promise of this project, for conceiving of this volume, and for astute and perceptive responses to earlier versions, which shaped the project as it stands now. Clinton Tolley read the penultimate version of the paper and contributed invaluable suggestions, including preventing me from making a most consequential error of translation, for which I am grateful.
    [Show full text]