View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 87 Issue 5 January 2010 Taste of Child Labor Not So Sweet: A Critique of Regulatory Approaches to Combating Child Labor Abuses by the U.S. Chocolate Industry Kemi Mustapha Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Kemi Mustapha, Taste of Child Labor Not So Sweet: A Critique of Regulatory Approaches to Combating Child Labor Abuses by the U.S. Chocolate Industry, 87 WASH. U. L. REV. 1163 (2010). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol87/iss5/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. TASTE OF CHILD LABOR NOT SO SWEET: A CRITIQUE OF REGULATORY APPROACHES TO COMBATING CHILD LABOR ABUSES BY THE U.S. CHOCOLATE INDUSTRY I. INTRODUCTION United States chocolate manufacturers,1 including Hershey‘s2 and Mars,3 received unwelcomed media attention in 2001 as reports of the use of child labor on West African cocoa farms surfaced.4 Investigations revealed that children harvest cocoa beans5 under conditions that qualify as the ―worst forms of child labor‖6 as defined in International Labour 1.