East Gippsland Regional Context

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Gippsland Regional Context East Gippsland Regional Context East Gippsland REGIONAL CONTEXT Area Population 2.1 million hectares approx. 45,000 Agriculture: 17% of catchment is private land, mostly used for grazing, and some irrigated horticulture and dairy. Natural features: Snowy River National Park, Errinundra National Park, Croajingolong National Park, Coopracambra National Park, Cape Howe Marine National Park. Major waterways: Gippsland Lakes (Ramsar listed), Snowy River, Mitchell River, Tambo River, Bemm River and Sydenham Inlet. Indigenous heritage: Native Title for much of the Gippsland Region is held by the Gunaikurnai people. Traditional Owners include the Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation. Source: EGCMA, 2013 Benedore River Estuary. Photo: EGCMA 88 Catchment Condition and Management Report 2017 Report Card East Gippsland REPORT CARD BIODIVERSITY Tree cover WATER Streamflow COMMUNITY Participation 100 300 East Gippsland Mitchell 90 Snowy 2013-14 7,019 80 250 Tambo Mitchell Tambo 70 200 60 Snowy 2014-15 6,483 50 150 East Gippsland 40 30 100 2015-16 3,183 20 50 10 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 0 0 Number of attendees 1988 1989 1991 1992 1995 1998 2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Average annual percentage (%) tree cover for the East Gippsland Basin streamflow (%) compared to long-term average. Community participation in CMA engagement events. region 1988-2016. Source: Van Dijk and Summers, 2016 Source: Victorian Water Accounts Source: Victorian Catchment Management Authorities, 2014, 2015, 2017 0 201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420022000199819951992199119891988 %01 LAND Exposed soil WATERWAYS Stream condition COASTS Vegetation retention 60 Excellent 53 Lakes Victoria and 80 50 King Scenario 1 Good 27 40 Moderate 17 Lakes Victoria and 100 30 King Scenario 2 Poor 2 %01 %01 20 Very poor 0.4 East Gippsland Inlets 85 10 Insufficient data 0 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Stream condition % length Retention of mangroves and other coastal marsh % Percentage (%) Dryland area with 30–100% bare soils (higher risk of Index of Stream Condition 2013 summary for the East Gippsland Estimated total retention (%) of Mangroves and Other Coastal Marsh erosion) in March, 2008-16. Sources: DEDJTR, 2017a; EnSym; Guerschman et al., 2015 region. Source: DEPI, 2013b, p. 72 from pre-1750 to ~2008. Source: Sinclair and Boon, 2012 %01 %01 Catchment Condition and Management Report 2017 89 East Gippsland Assessment ASSESSMENT OF CATCHMENT CONDITION LAND COASTS The East Gippsland region has almost negligible risk of erosion from The extent of saltmarsh in Lakes Victoria and King have all been bare soils in dryland production areas over the last nine years. This influenced by the artificial opening of these systems to the Southern is largely due to relatively high average annual rainfall, varying from Ocean. Increases in salinity may have increased saltmarsh extent 600 mm to 1,000 mm across public land in the catchment. The East over and above naturally-occurring saltmarsh. Thus two scenarios Gippsland CMA reports that there is no significant evidence of poor were assessed, with Scenario 1 based on extensive pre-European condition for its soils (EGCMA, 2016). distribution, and Scenario 2 on more limited pre-European distribution (Sinclair and Boon, 2012). WATER The East Gippsland coast is protected by an extensive network of According to the last index of stream condition benchmark conducted national parks, coastal parks, marine national parks, and a marine in 2010 (DEPI, 2013b), almost three quarters (70%) of stream reaches sanctuary (EGCMA, 2016). The CMA reports that the coast is in a assessed are in excellent or good condition. A very small proportion stable condition. (2.4%) of river reaches, on the Snowy and Mitchell basins, are in poor or very poor condition, mostly due to limited vegetation width. Basin COMMUNITY streamflow was high in 2011-12 and 2014-15. Community participation has slightly declined over three years. The East Gippsland CMA reports improved condition of riparian However, the reduction in community participation is due to the CMA sites, based on their application of the works monitoring method undertaking a more targeted approach to community engagement (EGCMA, 2016). and having more one on one discussions with community members (EGCMA, 2016). BIODIVERSITY The top three community concerns about environmental health relate The East Gippsland region has widespread tree cover (85%), as to feral animals (92% of respondents), invasive weeds (77%), and approximately 83% of the region is public land held in state forests and declining numbers of native fish (57%); all considered a problem by national parks. The East Gippsland CMA assessed biodiversity in the respondents (Schirmer et al., 2016). region as remaining stable through 2015-16, with small gains in habitat enhancement (EGCMA, 2016). 90 Catchment Condition and Management Report 2017 Case Study East Gippsland CASE STUDY Enhancing soil health through better management: the Topsoils project LOCATION: East Gippsland The project has sampled soil and plant data over nearly 100,000 hectares of farming land in East Gippsland, or PARTICIPANTS: East Gippsland CMA, Department of Economic approximately 25% of total farmland in the region. This includes Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, East Gippsland information on soil type, pH, chemical elements, salinity and organic Landcare Network, Far East Victoria Landcare, Greening Australia, matter. Over 200 farmers were involved in soil sampling. Southern Farming Systems, and Snowy River Interstate Landcare Committee. Funded by the National Landcare Programme. Farmers were also asked about their soil management attitudes and practices as part of the project. The results from the OBJECTIVES: To support farmers in managing soils by identifying questionnaire, as well as soil and plant data, were used to develop soil health factors that limit production, and to work in partnership three demonstration sites and a training program for farmers. with farmers to improve soil management practices. The demonstration sites were opened to the public in 2016, in Photo: EGCMA Soil health is a key regional management priority in the East combination with workshops on assessing soil condition, and how Gippsland region. The East Gippsland CMA has adopted a regional this is affected by farm management practices. “This project combines biophysical strategic approach towards maintaining soil health, with a long-term science about soil characteristics with This project combines biophysical science about soil characteristics objective of “[Maintaining]…the productive values and stability of with social science about farmer attitudes and practices to enable social science about farmer attitudes agricultural land and soils” (EGCMA, 2013, p. 31), and short-term more targeted management practices. The project aims to provide and practices to enable more targeted objective of supporting best practice management and assessing further training and have 10,000 hectares of land under improved management practices. The project the viability of agricultural land. aims to provide further training and management practices by 2018. With this in mind, the CMAs Topsoils project is a multi-partner have 10,000 hectares of land under The CMA also hopes that there will be long-term, sustainable regional project to benchmark current soil condition, soil fertility improved management practices change in soil management by farmers in the region. The training and farming practices. by 2018.” program and demonstration site field days have generated a good understanding of the differences in soils across the region. It is not yet clear whether these extension activities have led to changes in soil management practices. Catchment Condition and Management Report 2017 91.
Recommended publications
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • THE Newsofthe
    THE NEWSoFTHE MELBOURNE BUSHWALKERS MELBOURNE BUSHWALKERS INC. A.... lUX EDITION 611 JANUARY 2002 60 CENTS ANNuAL GENERAL MEETING Wednesday 27 February 2002 8.00 p.m. TheAnnexe Levell, Tralles Hall Comer of Lygon & Victoria Streets, Carlton It's your club, make sure you know Wine & Cheese Nite what's happening & what's planned. Come & enjoy our new clubrooms! Come along & cast your vote (members). Starting 23 January, Non-members also welcome to attend the Club will put on wines & cheeses but may not vote. on the third Wednesday of each month. New committee to be installed. So come in & catch up with your mates. Wait, there's more ... JOIN THE CREW IN 2002! Let's take advantage ofour new gardt:n areas! Once every quarter, CONSIDER COMING ON BOARD we '/I be having a (bring your own meat) BBQ­ & HELP STEER THE CLUB INTO THE FUTURE again, wines supplied by the Club. All Committee Positions Become Vacant in February. Watch for dates to be announced. Present Committee Members Not Standing for Re-election: Vice-President, Secretary, Walks Secretary, Assistant Walks Secretary FROM THE EDITOR & Some General Committee Members (Social Secretary is Currently Vacant) Attention: Leaders of walks, etc. in March. A Form for the Nomination of Officers I would be grateful if you would keep your previews & Committee Members is on Page 11 as brief as possible for the next News. There are a large number of previews to fit into the February edition as there are 2 long weekends in March this year (Labour Day & Easter) & there will be reports for 2001 from office bearers included too.
    [Show full text]
  • Mallacoota Urban Design Framework
    MALLACOOTA URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK COASTAL TOWNS DESIGN FRAMEWORK VOLUME 3 MARCH 2007 Copyright © Meinhardt Infrastructure & Environment Pty Ltd 2007 Disclaimer Information in this document is current as of March 2007. While all professional care has been undertaken in preparing the document, Meinhardt accepts no liability for loss or damages incurred as a result of reliance placed upon its content. The mention of any company, product or process in this report does not constitute or imply endorsement by Meinhardt. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................1 2. PROJECT SCOPE AND APPROACH ..............................................2 3. SETTLEMENT STUDY AREA ..........................................................5 3.1 REGIONAL INFLUENCES ................................................................5 3.2 SETTLEMENT DESCRIPTION .........................................................6 4. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT ................................12 4.1 STATE / REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY ........................................12 4.2 EAST GIPPSLAND PLANNING SCHEME ........................................15 4.3 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ............................................................18 5. COMMUNITY VIEWS ........................................................................19 5.1 CONSULTATION PROGRAM ............................................................19 5.2 KEY MATTERS FROM COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ..........................21 6. URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK PRINCIPLES
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Near-Pristine Estuaries
    Australia’s near-pristine estuaries: Current knowledge and management Emma Murray, Lynda Radke, Brendan Brooke, David Ryan, Andrew Moss, Ray Murphy, Malcolm Robb and David Rissik June 2006 Australia’s near-pristine estuaries: current knowledge and management Copyright © 2006: Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management Written by: Emma Murray Lynda Radke Brendan Brooke David Ryan Andrew Moss Ray Murphy Malcolm Robb David Rissik Published by the Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management (Coastal CRC) Indooroopilly Sciences Centre 80 Meiers Road Indooroopilly Qld 4068 Australia www.coastal.crc.org.au The text of this publication may be copied and distributed for research and educational purposes with proper acknowledgment. Photos cannot be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Disclaimer: The information in this report was current at the time of publication. While the report was prepared with care by the authors, the Coastal CRC and its partner organisations accept no liability for any matters arising from its contents. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data Australia’s near-pristine estuaries: current knowledge and management QNRM06256 ISBN 1 921017 32 5 (print) ISBN 1 921017 33 3 (online) ii Australia’s near-pristine estuaries: Current knowledge and management Emma Murray1,6, Lynda Radke1, Brendan Brooke1, David Ryan1, Andrew Moss2, Ray Murphy3, Malcolm Robb4 and David Rissik5 June 2006 1 Geoscience Australia 2 Queensland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Croajingolong National Park Management Plan
    National Parks Service Croajingolong National Park Management Plan June 1996 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT This Management Plan for Croajingolong National Park is approved for implementation. Its purpose is to direct all aspects of management in the Park until the Plan is reviewed. A Draft Management Plan was published in June 1993. A total of 36 submissions were received. Copies of the Plan can be obtained from: Cann River Information Centre Department of Natural Resources and Environment Princes Highway CANN RIVER VIC 3809 Information Centre Department of Natural Resources and Environment 240 Victoria Parade EAST MELBOURNE VIC 3002 Further information on this Plan can be obtained from the NRE Cann River office (051) 586 370. CROAJINGOLONG NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN National Parks Service DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT VICTORIA JUNE 1996 ã Crown (State of Victoria) 1996 A Victorian Government Publication This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1986. Published June 1996 by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment 240 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Victoria. National Parks Service. Croajingolong National Park management plan. Bibliography. ISBN 0 7306 6137 7. 1. Croajingolong National Park (Vic.). 2. National parks and reserves - Victoria - Gippsland - Management. I. Victoria. Dept of Natural Resources and Environment. II. Title. 333.783099456 Note: In April 1996 the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (CNR) became part of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE). Cover: Looking east from Rame Head (photograph K.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Catchment Management in Victoria 1997–2017
    Integrated Catchment Management in Victoria 1997–2017 Acknowledgement of Victoria’s Aboriginal communities The Victorian Government proudly acknowledges Victoria’s Aboriginal community and their rich culture and pays respect to their Elders past and present. We acknowledge Aboriginal people as Australia’s first peoples and as the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land, water and biodiversity on which we rely. We recognise and value the ongoing contribution of Aboriginal people and communities to Victorian life and how this enriches us. We embrace the spirit of reconciliation, working towards the equality of outcomes and ensuring an equal voice. Cover photo: Screw Creek flowing into Anderson Inlet, Gippsland.Photo: WGCMA Foreword This year marks a very significant milestone for the Catchment Management Framework in Victoria, the 20th anniversary of its establishment in 1997. Looking back on our many positive achievements over those 20 years is important and we all must learn from such reflection. This brochure highlights just a sample of activities undertaken by our Catchment Management Authorities in collaboration with their many partners. We can justly be proud of these achievements. Looking forward is even more important when taking present and emerging trends and pressures into account. These include climate change, population increase and increased demand on the resources provided by healthy catchments and our coastal and marine environments. So we must be well-informed and reflective of our communities, take advantage of improved technologies and have the support of governments, our partner organisations and our people to continue working together and building on our achievements to date. I have every confidence that we can and will meet the many challenges and opportunities ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • March 08 Book.Pmd
    2 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2008, 25, 2–11 The Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus in East Gippsland, Victoria, 1997–2002 MICHAEL D. BRAMWELL Department of Sustainability and Environment, Bairnsdale, Victoria 3875 (Email: [email protected]) Summary This paper presents results from surveys to determine the distribution and abundance of the Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus and its Ecological Vegetation Class (EVC) preference from Howe Flat (5 km east of Mallacoota, Victoria) to Nadgee Nature Reserve in New South Wales over the period 1997–2002. A total of 1055 ha was surveyed, yielding 50 Bristlebird detection sites. A clear preference for Riparian Scrub Complex was recorded, with 38 of 50 Bristlebirds being detected within that EVC. At Bristlebird detection sites, ground-cover sedge species were the plants recorded most frequently and at the highest cover/abundance values; shrubs >1.5 m tall were recorded with a higher cover/abundance than shrubs <1.5 m. Forty-six of the 50 detections were from Howe Flat, and an estimated 60–80 pairs at a population density of 15–20 birds/100 ha were found there. Habitat is mostly unsuitable over the 10 km between the eastern edge of Howe Flat and recorded Bristlebird habitat in Nadgee Nature Reserve. Hence, the southern population of Eastern Bristlebirds should be managed as two subpopulations. Six other areas throughout Gippsland were also surveyed for Eastern Bristlebirds, but no Bristlebirds were recorded at any of these sites. Introduction The Eastern Bristlebird Dasyornis brachypterus is one of four bird species in Victoria considered endangered at both a state and national level (DSE 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas in Australia
    TERRESTRIAL AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN AUSTRALIA 2002 SUMMARY STATISTICS FROM THE COLLABORATIVE AUSTRALIAN PROTECTED AREAS DATABASE (CAPAD) Department of the Environment and Heritage, 2003 Published by: Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. Citation: Environment Australia, 2003. Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas in Australia: 2002 Summary Statistics from the Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD), The Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary Parks Australia South Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601. The views and opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Director of National Parks. Copies of this publication are available from: National Reserve System National Reserve System Section Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 or online at http://www.deh.gov.au/parks/nrs/capad/index.html For further information: Phone: (02) 6274 1111 Acknowledgments: The editors would like to thank all those officers from State, Territory and Commonwealth agencies who assisted to help compile and action our requests for information and help. This assistance is highly appreciated and without it and the cooperation and help of policy, program and GIS staff from all agencies this publication would not have been possible. An additional huge thank you to Jason Passioura (ERIN, Department of the Environment and Heritage) for his assistance through the whole compilation process.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Recreational Use of Waterways
    7 Recreational use of waterways Enjoying the Glenelg River. Photographer: Johanna Slijkerman 78 Victorian Waterway Management Strategy Part 3: Management issues Recreational use of waterways Guide to the chapter 7.1 Context What are the issues with 7.2 Recreational fishing existing arrangements? • Improving waterway condition The social and economic values that to support fish populations waterways provide should be more • Responsibilities for managing comprehensively considered in waterway freshwater and estuarine fish management planning and management in Victoria activities. In some cases, managing for • Recreational fish species social values (such as recreational fishing) 7.3 Recreational duck hunting can conflict with managing for environmental • Ensuring recreational duck hunting values (such as threatened native fish is sustainable populations). Recreational use of lakes, • Habitat conservation and game reservoirs and storages can be affected management by periods of drought so clear roles and responsibilities need to be defined for 7.4 Recreational use of lakes and management during these times. reservoirs • Managing storage levels What improvements does • Agency roles and responsibilities the Strategy make? for drying lakes For recreational use of waterways 7.5 Recreational boating the Strategy will: • encourage and support community 7.6 Managing the impacts of involvement in waterway planning for, recreational activities and management of, recreational use of waterways • acknowledge the importance of waterways for recreation and promote sustainable recreational use • manage risks associated with recreational use of waterways through guidelines, protocols and education. Victorian Waterway Management Strategy 79 Part 3 7.1 Context Victoria’s scenic and diverse waterways It is important that the condition of Victoria’s waterways is maintained or improved to ensure that valuable recreational provide vital opportunities for communities opportunities persist into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • East Gippsland Area Review
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL EAST GIPPSLAND AREA REVIEW FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS December 1986 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s East Gippsland Area Review Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 15 December 1987 and subsequent formal amendments. Where the Review refers back to the March 1977 East Gippsland Area Final Recommendations, for completeness recommendation wording and Crown descriptions have been reproduced. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origin of changes. 2 MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D. H. F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R. W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.Admin.; Director, Land Protection Division (Deputy Chairman) C. N. Austin, C.B.E. D. M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. L. Macmillan B.Sc. (Hons) P. A. Eddison, Dip.T.R.P.; Director-General, Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands R. D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. J. J Wright, B.Sc. (Tech.), M.Eng.Sc., Grad.Dip.O.R.; Chief General Manager, Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs G. G. Newman, B.Sc., M.Sc., M.B.Admin., Ph.D.; Director, Fisheries Division J. P. Paterson, B.Com., Ph.D.; Director-General, Department of Water Resources D. S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director, National Parks and Wildlife Division R. P. Smith, B.Sc., M.B.Admin., Ph.D.; Director, Public Land Management and Forests Division K.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Marine & Coastal Ecosystems
    2. Marine & Coastal Ecosystems 26 MARINE AND COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS Guide to chapter 2 This chapter focuses on marine and coastal environments in recognition of their tight ecological links and the need for integrated management. The area of focus is waters under the jurisdiction of the Victorian government, which extend 5.5 kilometres seaward from the high water mark, and land within 500 metres of the shoreline. Some issues relevant to the coast are covered in chapters 3 and 4 on terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Section 2.1 describes the high natural, social and economic values of Victoria’s marine and coastal ecosystems and the major habitat types. Section 2.2 outlines the status of biodiversity and protected areas, and the condition of bays, inlets and estuaries. Major threats to marine and coastal nature – particularly climate change, coastal development, invasive species and fishing – are described in section 2.3. Section 2.4 is a summary of a gap analysis of Victoria’s marine protected areas, which identifies bioregional priorities for new and expanded marine national parks and sanctuaries. Similarly, for coastal subregions, section 2.5 summarises an analysis of values, threats and priorities for upgrading the national park and conservation system. Finally, in sections 2.6 and 2.7, policy gaps and high priority reforms are identified in three major areas: improving knowledge, creating a comprehensive, adequate and representative national park and conservation system, and integrating and strengthening management of marine and coastal
    [Show full text]