DOCSLIB.ORG

A Companion to the Roman Army

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Companion to the Roman Army A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Author: Paul Erdkamp Number of Pages: 600 pages Published Date: 21 Dec 2010 Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Publication Country: Chicester, United Kingdom Language: English ISBN: 9781444339215 DOWNLOAD: A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Darts 23 Full Episodes. Full Episodes Movies Schedule. Copy the link below To share this on Facebook click on the link below. The same would apply to the Princeps if they were under too much pressure they would fall back to regroup and allow the most experienced units, the Triarii, to be deployed. The flanks of the army were protected by three hundred cavalrymen. The cavalry performed various functions: they were to strike the enemy's flank and rears in swift assaults before retreating to strike again. Secondly, they were used in skirmishes and to chase down any fleeing enemy. Thirdly, they were used for reconnaissance and intelligence gathering. In BCE, Gaius Marius was elected consul and introduced the Marian reforms, broad sweeping changes to the military which transitioned it into the legions which helped dominate and maintain the Rome's domains. The Roman army was organized into legions of 4, soldiers. Each legion was split into ten cohorts of soldiers. Other records show it later served on the Cumbrian coast at the Fort at Moresby. The Fourth Cohort of Gauls came from modern-day France and again was a mixed auxiliary, with a unit of some Again this auxiliary may have come to Britain during the invasion of AD It moved north to the Antonine Wall where it was stationed at Castlehill fort. It was from this fort we know the name of the Roman commander, one Pisentius Lustus who had an altar made to honour the Parade Ground Goddesses. The final record shows it back serving at Vindolanda. This was a unit that came from the north of Spain Hispania Terraconensis raised as the First Cohort of Vardullians, with a field strength of some 1, men. One of its earliest locations along the Antonine Wall was at the fort at Castlecary. One other source suggests that it also served in North Africa. It is known from archaeology that pottery from North Africa has been found along sites on the Antonine Wall. Some of the troops probably came from the campaigns of the war in Africa. Another famous Unit of Auxiliary infantry some strong who came from modern Belgium and were known as the Sixth Cohort of Nervians. Rome nearly burns to the ground. The empire is on the edge of disaster. With Nero's death, the dynasty of Augustus comes to an end. Once again, the Empire faces an uncertain future. Rival generals fight for supremacy in the streets of Rome. A new dynasty brings another tyrant to the throne, and Mount Vesuvius erupts, burying Pompeii and thousands of people beneath a torrent of ash and mud. A young citizen survives the disaster and records the night of terror. But the Empire weathers the traumas. As the first century draws to a close, the Emperor Trajan expands the empire to its greatest geographic extent and offers new prosperity to a greater number of citizens. He sets the course for generations to come and projects the collective voice of ancient Rome across the ages. This programme, the first in the series, tells the exciting story of how and why the Romans invaded Britannia in the year AD It shows that the invasion was rooted in two things, the emperor Claudius's desire to strengthen his grip on power by chalking up a major military conquest and the Roman state's intention to exploit the rich reserves of gold, silver, corn, timber and other natural resources the island was known to possess. The great Julius Caesar had tried and failed to conquer Britain years before, and yet the Roman soldiers who carried out the invasion under the leadership of a well respected general called Aulus Plautius were confident of success. They saw the Celtic tribes who inhabited Britannia as backward barbarians who couldn't possibly stand up to Rome's awesome military might for a second time. But the programme demonstrates conclusively that this belief was wrong. We explore one of the most vivid and crucial events in the year-long history of Roman Britain, the widespread rebellion spearheaded by the famous warrior queen known as Boudicca. We examine how the Romans behaved during their year-long occupation of Britannia and conclude that the benign image of Roman Britain that arose during the Victorian era needs to be radically revised. Journey to the ancient cities, Volterra, Populonia and Cervetari and see why Etruscan civilisation was famous for its lavish wealthy, fine ceramics and bustling trade. Caesar 60 mins — Traces the story of Julius Caesar. Take a tour of Tripopolitania, a rich Roman province on the shores of the Mediterranean and visit the famous city of Oea, best known as Tripoli. Timelines of Ancient Civilizations: Roman Kanopy; 2 videos each 17 mins. Best known for his trek across the Alps with 40, men and even elephants in tow, Hannibal was a Carthaginian warrior with his sights ever set on destroying Rome. This History Channel special consults archaeologists and military historians to get to the heart of Hannibal's enduring grudge against the mighty empire. What Destroyed Rome? This military replication, in turn, allowed the Romans to triumph over the Etruscans. Anon in his Ineditum Vaticanum also supports this view by saying how the Etruscans were given a taste of their own medicine when the Roman army embraced the very same tight hoplite formations to counter its enemies. As per historical tradition, the adoption of the hoplite tactics was fueled by the sweeping military reforms undertaken by the penultimate Roman ruler Servius Tullius, who probably ruled in 6th century BC. In that regard, the Roman army and its mirroring peace-time society were segregated into classes classis. According to Livy, there were six such classes — all based on their possession of wealth that was defined by asses or small copper coins. The first three classes fought as the traditional hoplites, armed with spears and shields — although the armaments decreased based on their economic statuses. The fourth class was only armed with spears and javelins, while the fifth class was scantily armed with slings. Finally, the six and poorest class was totally exempt from military service. This system once again alludes to how the early Roman army was formed on truly nationalistic values. But the greatest strength of the Roman army had always been its adaptability and capability to evolve. Like we mentioned before how the early Romans from their kingdom era adopted the hoplite tactics of their foes and defeated them in turn. However, by the time of the First Samnite War in around BC , the Roman army seemed to have endorsed newer formations that were more flexible in nature. Whether the army succeeded depended not only on its weapons and equipment, but also its training and discipline, and on the experience of its soldiers, all of which combined to allow the most effective deployment of its manpower. Moreover, every army is backed by a more or less developed organization that is needed to mobilize and sustain it. Changes in Roman society significantly affected the Roman army. However, the army was also itself an agent of change, determining in large part developments in politics and government, economy and society. This didn't do much to encourage Rome to employ more mercenary forces anytime soon. It wasn't until the third century CE that Germanic tribes would be hired to protect the Roman Empire's borders. The Roman army was a highly organised force with a well-defined hierarchy. Officers had total command of their underlings and soldiers knew exactly what was required of them on a daily basis. As stated above the Roman army had a very rigid and well set out hirearchy. This meant that each man knew who he reported to and who reported to him. These two men had total control over Rome's armies. However, as time passed and Rome's territories grew, more soldiers and legions were required. Thus there was a need more generals. To take command of a legion a man would have to hold the position of praetorian rank or higher in the Senate. The man in charge of a legion was called a legatus. This position afforded the man an enormous amount of power: they would receive large amounts of booty won on campaign. Additionally, they had absolute authority over their men and civilians, being able to issue any punishment they saw fit. As a result of all this power, Augustus restricted the time a man could serve as legatus to two years. This was later extended to four years and in many cases, the legatus would serve indefinitely. Below the legatus there were seven senior officers. These officers were often appointed by the legatus based off recommendations from other high ranking Romans. The tibunus laticlavius was the son of a senator. This position was one of the first steps in his political career which would more often than not take him back to a life in Rome. Next in command were the five tribuni angusticlavii. These men were from the equestrian class and were each in charge of two cohorts. The praefectus castrorum was the camp-prefect. He was in charge of discipline and overseeing construction projects. This was the highest position a normal Roman citizen could reach. He would often be promoted from the position of primus pilus the most senior centurion of a legion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Immunes and Prjncipales at Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa
    IMMUNES AND PRJNCIPALES AT ULPIA TRAIANA SARMIZEGETUSA GEORGE CUPCEA IMMUNES ŞI PRINCIP ALES LA ULPIA TRAIANA SARMISEGETUSA Rezumat: Studiul se apleacă asupra identificării soldaţilor romani ce au ocupat vreun grad inferior în armata romană, atestaţi în capitala Daciei romane, Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa. După cum se ştie, elementul militar a avut un rol foarte important în crearea Sarmizegetusei şi în transplantarea civilizaţiei romane în nou-născuta provincie. Sunt atestate unsprezece astfel de personaje, ocupând doar şapte ranguri, aflate sub cel de centurion. Rangurile inferioare atestate sunt: scriniarius praefectorum praetorio, actarius, librarius a rationibus, adiutor offici corniculariorum, frumentarius, beneficiarius consularis şi signifer. Dintre aceste grade, două sunt immunes, ambele parte din officium al unui ofiţer superior, şi cinci principales, din care patru fac parte dintr-un astfel de officium. După lăsarea la vatră, cinci dintre personaje fac parte din ordo decurionum, doi dintre ei fiind chiar într-o situaţie specială, decurioni în absenţă. Abstract: This paper identifies the Roman soldiers that occupied any inferior rank in the army, attested in the Dacian provincial capital, Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa. The military element held a very important role in the creation of this major city, and, in the empowerment of the Roman civilization in the newly-created province. We have eleven such characters, attested in Sarmizegetusa, on seven different ranks, each one under the centurionate. These ranks are: scriniarius praefectorum praetorio, actarius, librarius a rationibus, adiutor offici corniculariorum, frumentarius, beneficiarius consularis and signifer. Out of them, two are immunes, both part of the officium of a superior officer, and five are principales, faur of them part of an officium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Matemáticas Respecto a Los Castra Romanos, Relativas a Su Construcción1
    ISSN 2254-6901 | Vínculos de Historia, núm. 5 (2016) | pp. 196-211 http://dx.doi.org/10.18239/vdh.v0i5.012 Matemáticas respecto a los castra romanos, relativas a su construcción1 Mathematics and the construction of the Roman castra José Francisco Fernández-Tejeda Vela Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) Fecha de recepción: 02.08.2015 Fecha de aceptación: 17.11.2015 RESUMEN Se señala que los distintos tipos de campamentos, tienen relación con la duración de la permanencia en ellos. A la vez se explica, sucintamente, la construcción de un campamento romano. Se propone que el número de soldados munifices, presenta un valor óptimo para asumir un riesgo mínimo por parte de la unidad militar. También se razona respecto a que la descripción realizada por Polibio, no se corresponde con los campamentos que han llegado a nuestros días, y se justifica que la gran mayoría de los campamentos conocidos, son castra necessaria, que no siguen el modelo canónico. PALABRAS CLAVE: campamento romano, riesgo constructivo, soldados munifices, soldados immunes, esfuerzo constructivo ABSTRACT We point out here that the differences between the three types of Roman camps were related to the duration of the stay in them. The construction of a Roman camp is also briefly explained. It is proposed that the number of soldiers munifices is optimal in order to assume minimal risk on the part of the military unit. It is also argued that the description given by Polybius does not correspond with the camps that have survived to the present day and we justify the fact that the vast majority of the camps known are castra necessaria and do not follow the canonical model.
    [Show full text]
  • A Funerary Relief of a 'Barbarian' from Soufli In
    doi: 10.2143/AWE.16.0.3214934 AWE 16 (2017) 63-95 A FUNERARY RELIEF OF A ‘BARBARIAN’ FROM SOUFLI IN THE ALEXANDROUPOLIS COLLECTION (GREECE)* DIMITRA ANDRIANOU Abstract Relief no. 4 from the Alexandroupolis Collection is an exceptional relief in many ways. It is part of a register-stele (Stockwerkstele), now partially preserved. The lower and better preserved register depicts a rider hunting in the heroic fashion; a smaller figure stands above the legs of the horse. Certain details allow us to identify the rider as a soldier in the Roman auxilia and the smaller figure as his clerk. The relief is important not only for its iconogra- phy, but also because it provides evidence for the presence of auxilia in the Hebros region in the late 2nd or 3rd century AD. Aegean Thrace, a modern, conventional designation, is the south-western and small- est section of ancient Thrace, bordered by the Nestos river to the west, the Hebros river to the east, Mt Rhodope to the north and the Aegean Sea to the south, all natural borders.1 Being a fruitful plain, it was already inhabited in the Palaeolithic period and according to the literary sources and the rapidly emerging archaeological evidence, various Thracian tribes dwelt in the area before Greek colonisation and lived side-by-side with the Greek colonists. The literary sources clearly state that Thracians resided on Thasos and Samothrace before the arrival of the Greeks and were their adversaries at Abdera and in the Strymon valley.2 The first Greek settlers arrived before the middle of the 7th century.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPANION to the ROMAN ARMY Edited By
    ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page iii A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY Edited by Paul Erdkamp ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page i A COMPANION TO THE ROMAN ARMY ACTA01 8/12/06 11:10 AM Page ii BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO THE ANCIENT WORLD This series provides sophisticated and authoritative overviews of periods of ancient history, genres of classical lit- erature, and the most important themes in ancient culture. Each volume comprises between twenty-five and forty concise essays written by individual scholars within their area of specialization. The essays are written in a clear, provocative, and lively manner, designed for an international audience of scholars, students, and general readers. Ancient History Published A Companion to the Roman Army A Companion to the Classical Greek World Edited by Paul Erdkamp Edited by Konrad H. Kinzl A Companion to the Roman Republic A Companion to the Ancient Near East Edited by Nathan Rosenstein and Edited by Daniel C. Snell Robert Morstein-Marx A Companion to the Hellenistic World A Companion to the Roman Empire Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by David S. Potter In preparation A Companion to Ancient History A Companion to Late Antiquity Edited by Andrew Erskine Edited by Philip Rousseau A Companion to Archaic Greece A Companion to Byzantium Edited by Kurt A. Raaflaub and Hans van Wees Edited by Elizabeth James A Companion to Julius Caesar Edited by Miriam Griffin Literature and Culture Published A Companion to Catullus A Companion to Greek Rhetoric Edited by Marilyn B. Skinner Edited by Ian Worthington A Companion to Greek Religion A Companion to Ancient Epic Edited by Daniel Ogden Edited by John Miles Foley A Companion to Classical Tradition A Companion to Greek Tragedy Edited by Craig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialisation and Promotion in the Roman Imperial Army by Michael Alexander Speidel
    SPECIALISATION AND PROMOTION IN THE ROMAN IMPERIAL ARMY BY MICHAEL ALEXANDER SPEIDEL Did professional specialisation increase the chances of promotion within the Roman army? And if so, what were the benefits of such a promotion?\ The Roman imperial army was a professional organisation with many specialists amongst the ordinary soldiers - so many specialists, in fact, that it may even seem difficult to define the ordinary soldier. For every soldier had a specific task assigned to hirn, depending on his unit and his position in the battle line. Auxiliary soldiers, in particular, were often highly specialised. Many ofthem fought in the light infantry units where some were specialised in fighting with different kinds of spears and javelins, others with axes, bows or slings etc. Auxiliary horsemen, too, were highly specialised soldiers, some fighting in light, others in heavy cavalry units, and again with many of them additionaHy specialised in certain weapons. Even legionary soldiers were very often specialised in fighting with particular weapons. By the third century the specialisation of weapon-skills in the legions was such that we find lancearii, phalangarii, sagittarii, triarii, equites and others attested on inscriptions.2 However, such specialists remained ordinary soldiers, as achieving skills in certain fighting techniques did not lead to promotion. There is only one exception to that rule: for an infantry soldier becoming a horseman was indeed a promotion. This is c1ear from a number of soldiers' careers, and from the fact, that horsemen earned higher pay.3 Transfer to a troop of higher rank was also considered a promotion, and it may weH have entailed training in new fighting techniques.4 However, there is nothing to show that the mastery of such techniques was required before promotion and transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Legionaries Living in Lutetia: a Study on the Socioeconomic Effects of The
    Legionaries Living in Lutetia: A Study on the Socioeconomic Effects of the Roman Army during the Principate Brian Wagner History Honors Thesis 1 Special thanks to: Professor Josiah Osgood, for all his inspiration, patience, and feedback, for without him this project would never have been possible. Professor Howard Spendelow, for his guidance, continued attention to detail, and consummate professionalism in his last year of service to the history honors seminar. My friends and family, who put up with me talking about Rome for the better part of a year, and who nodded and smiled whenever I tried to tell them that, yes, it really is interesting, I swear. (Front page: legionaries standing in formation while on campaign during the Second Dacian War of 105 CE. Scene 98, taken from Trajan’s Column - http://www.trajans-column.org/) 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Chapter 1: Background 7 Chapter 2: Structure of the Roman Army 18 Chapter 3: Consumption and Production in the Roman Army 57 Chapter 4: Economic and Social Effects of the Army 89 Conclusion 109 Glossary 112 Bibliography 117 3 Introduction: During the reign of Augustus, the Roman military fielded approximately 400,000 soldiers, an impressive figure in both size and scope. Supplying and equipping such a massive force involved a logistical network on an unprecedented scale. These professional soldiers were stationed in every corner of the empire for decades at a time, serving as the defensive bastion against the “barbarians” beyond the frontiers. Establishing permanent bases and forts, they became integral parts of the local economy through trade, intermarriage, and the building of infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian's Wall
    HADRIAN’S WALL: Boundary Monument for the Northern Frontier of Roman Britannia! John F. Brock Keywords: Emperor Hadrian, Roman Britannia, The Wall, The Vallum, Roman,Surveying, Surveyors Written Instructions (Corpus Agrimensorum Romanum), Vallum Hadriani, Vallum Antonini, International Borders. ABSTRACT “A man’s worth is no greater than his ambitions.” – Marcus Aurelius HHAADDRRIIAANN’’SS WWAALLLL Fig. 1 A section of Hadrian’s Wall in north England showing material and construction type Much hypotheses and over-thinking has taken place over hundreds of years in an effort to attribute purposes for the raison d’etre of the wall across northern Britain erected at the behest of the formidable Roman Emperor whose name has been ultimately used to describe this intriguing edifice. HADRIAN’S WALL: Boundary Monument for the Northern Frontier of Roman Britannia! (9164) John Brock (Australia) FIG Working Week 2017 Surveying the world of tomorrow - From digitalisation to augmented reality Helsinki, Finland, May 29–June 2, 2017 Was it built for defence, border control, a demonstration of power or any number of associated intentions as a strategic military device at the extremity of the territorial outskirts of the Great Empire? Many postulations have been advanced by engineers, stone masons, clerks of works, military experts, academics, archaeologists, historians, paleontologists and all the usual suspects. However I have only sourced one other opinion for its creation put forward by another land surveyor like myself having been offered by my very good friend from the US Mary Root who I see at least once a year at the Surveyors Rendezvous held annually in different locations within the USA to celebrate the local Surveying history of many notable places in the Land of the Free and President Surveyors (please note that US Presidents Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln were all land surveyors!).
    [Show full text]
  • Standing by the Standards
    STANDING BY THE STANDARDS: MILITARY RANK AND SOCIAL STATUS IN THE ROMAN WEST FROM AUGUSTUS TO DIOCLETIAN Charles Henry Manklow Pembroke College Faculty of Classics University of Cambridge This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2020 i DECLARATION This thesis is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted or is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my thesis has already been submitted, or is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. ii iii ABSTRACT Standing by the standards Military rank and social status in the Roman west from Augustus to Diocletian This thesis broadly conceived is about the relationship between military and civil society in the time of the Roman Principate. It is about making sense of the tensions experienced by the soldiers and veterans of the Roman army between their lives as milites and as cives. This thesis weaves soldiers and veterans back into the wider social fabric of the Roman world – the social environments from which they commenced their military service, and into which they would settle upon their discharge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twentieth Legion and the History of the Antonine Wall Reconsidered1" Vivien G Swan*
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 129 (1999), 399-480 The Twentieth Legion and the history of the Antonine Wall reconsidered1" Vivien G Swan* ABSTRACT A study of utilitarian pottery from the Antonine Wall has distinguished small numbers of locally made vessels with North African affinities at nine or 10 forts. Similar vessels at Chester and others made by Legio XX at the Holt works depot, one with a potter's graffito in neo-Punic, suggest the presence of North Africans. Detachments sent from Britain to Pius' Mauretanian war of AD 146-9 may have brought North Africans back with them Britainto (possibly including legionary recruits or transfers, and Moorish irregulars or levies). At the western sector of the Antonine Wall, changes in the legionary work-stints may be linked to troop reductions for the war, as the mural barrier and Bearsden and Duntocher fort interiors were still unfinished. After the conflict, Bearsden and Duntocher were each partitioned maketo annexean theirand internal buildings re-plannedand completed; programmea annexeof construction began otherat forts, secondaryand alterations were made to many existing fort interiors. All may be connected with changes in units or in the composition of the returning garrisons, now perhaps mixed and augmented with small numbers of North African troops. Possible relevant epigraphic evidence examined.is INTRODUCTION histor AntoninThe the yof e Wal bee subjeclhas nthe numbea of t bookrof articlesand s overthe past century. Most have been concerned wit structurale hth , epigraphi numismatid can c evidence (Macdonald 1911 & 1934; Steer 1964; Hanson & Maxwell 1983; Gillam 1976; Breeze 1976), though Brian Hartley's paper (1972) focused on the samian ware as a relative dating tool in a compariso occupatione th f no Hadrian'f so Antonine th d san e Walls purpose Th .
    [Show full text]
  • The Logistics of the Roman Army at War (264 B.C. - A.D
    THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) COLUMBIA STUDIES IN THE CLASSICAL TRADITION under the direction of WILLIAM V. HARRIS (Editor) • PAUL OSKAR KRISTELLER EUGENE F. RICE, JR. • ALAN CAMERON JAMES A. COULTER • RICHARD BRILLIANT SUZANNE SAID VOLUME XXIII THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) BY JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 1999 This book is printed on acid -free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roth, Jonathan, 1955– The logistics of the Roman army at war (264 B.C.-A.D. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. p. cm. — (Columbia studies in the classical tradition, ISSN 0166-1302 ; v. 23) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 9004112715 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Rome—Army—Supplies and stores. 2. Rome—Army– –Transportation—Equipment and supplies. 3. Logistics. 4. Rome– –History, Military—265-30 B.C. 5. Rome—History, Military—30 B.C.-476 A.D. I. Title. II. Series. DG89.R675 1998 355.4’11’0937—dc21 98–42368 CIP Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Roth, Jonathan P.: The logistics of the Roman army at war : (264 b.c. - a.d. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. – Leiden ; Boston ; Köln : Brill, 1998 (Columbia studies in the classical tradition ; Vol. 23) ISBN 90–04–11271–5 ISSN 0166-1302 ISBN 90 04 11271 5 © Copyright 1999 by The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from anytype of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adverselyaffect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrightmaterial had to be removed, a note willindicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. V-M=l University Microfilms International A Beil & Howell tntorrnation Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. M148106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 --_._---- Order Number 9215033 The legionary horsemen: An essay on the equites legionis and equites promoti Pavkovic, Michael Frederick, Ph.D. University of Hawaii, 1991 Copyright @1991 by Pavkovil, Michael Frederick.
    [Show full text]