An Introduction to Emv What Is It? What Are Its Benefits?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
How Can Private Sector Systems Achieve Public Policy Goals?
Faster Payments in the United States: How Can Private Sector Systems Achieve Public Policy Goals? Fumiko Hayashi June 2015 RWP 15-03 Faster Payments in the United States: How Can Private Sector Systems Achieve Public Policy Goals?∗ Fumiko Hayashi† June 2015 Abstract Consumers and businesses are increasingly expecting faster payments. While many countries have already developed or are in process of developing faster payments, the availability of these payments is fragmented in the United States. The recently released paper by the Federal Reserve encourages private sector participants to provide faster payment services. However, private- sector faster payments systems will face significant challenges in achieving public policy goals of ubiquity, safety, and efficiency unless system governance represents broad public interests. One way to better align private-sector interests with those of the public is for the Federal Reserve to influence governance of the private-sector systems through its leadership role. JEL Classification: L5; L88; M14 Keywords: Faster payments, System governance, Public interest ∗ The author thanks Kelly Edmiston and Richard J. Sullivan for valuable comments, and Elizabeth Cook for editorial suggestions. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System. † Fumiko Hayashi is a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. E-mail: [email protected]. 1 1. Introduction In the wake of technological innovations such as high-speed data networks and sophisticated mobile computing devices, consumers and businesses have raised their expectations for faster payments. Payment users increasingly expect electronic payment products to be accessible through mobile and online channels at any time. -
Laser-Marked Document Showing a Colour-Shift Effect
(19) & (11) EP 2 174 797 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 14.04.2010 Bulletin 2010/15 B42D 15/00 (2006.01) B42D 15/10 (2006.01) B41M 5/24 (2006.01) B41M 3/14 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 08017527.6 (22) Date of filing: 07.10.2008 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Klein, Sylke AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR 64380 Rossdorf (DE) HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT • Montag, Heidemarie RO SE SI SK TR 64289 Darmstadt (DE) Designated Extension States: AL BA MK RS (74) Representative: Luderschmidt, Schüler & Partner Patentanwälte (71) Applicant: European Central Bank John-F.-Kennedy-Strasse 4 60311 Frankfurt am Main (DE) 65189 Wiesbaden (DE) (72) Inventors: • Arrieta, Antonio Jesús 60311 Frankfurt am Main (DE) (54) Laser-marked document showing a colour-shift effect (57) Document comprising a coating containing at the coated area with a pulsed laser beam at a rate of least one sort of effect pigments, wherein said document greater than 500 mm/s and a laser mark having a colour also comprises at least one laser mark having a high shift effect is obtained. contrast and a strong colour shift effect The authenticity of the document can be easily Said document is obtainable by a process, wherein, checked by visual inspection from different viewing an- a document comprising a coating containing at least one gles. sort of effectpigments which show differentcolours under different viewing angles is treated on at least a part of EP 2 174 797 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) EP 2 174 797 A1 Description BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 5 1. -
Bitcoin: a Seemingly Rampant Elevator, Or Is Someone Pushing Its Buttons?
Södertörn University | Institution for Social Sciences Bachelor Thesis (15 hp) | Business Studies - Finance | Spring Semester 2014 Bitcoin: A Seemingly Rampant Elevator, or is Someone Pushing its Buttons? - A Case Study on Bitcoin’s Fluctuations in Price and Concept. Author: Oscar Wandery Supervisor: Maria Smolander Stockholm Södertörn University Business Studies Abstract This study looks at the price mechanism of the digital quasi-currency bitcoin. Through statistical analysis of secondary data a probable significant results regarding correlation and regression between price and different independent variables have been established. The final analysis is pointing towards network effects being a part of the determinants for the crypto-currency’s price. Complimentary to the quantitative study explained above, an implementation of hermeneutic analysis based on secondary theoretical sources, journalistic opinion and a professional qualified judgment has aided the author and study in conceptual understanding. This interpretation has semantic character, and takes a Socratic kickoff regarding the nature of bitcoin as a financial instrument. The analysis runs back and forth throughout the course of the study and finally intertwines with qualitative results in the discussion. It is the author’s impression that a significant dimorphism surrounds bitcoin, calling for a conceptual differentiation leading to practical rethinking. The study takes the shape of a case-study conducted over four months. The author’s location during the process of writing was Stockholm Sweden, but the gathered data is of transnational character. Keywords: Bitcoin, crypto-currency, money, digital money, price fluctuations, financial instruments, financial systems. 2 Stockholm Södertörn University Business Studies Sammanfattning Den här studien tittar på prismekanismen hos den digitala kvasi-valören bitcoin. -
Contactless Operating Mode Requirements Clarification Whitepaper
Contactless Operating Mode Requirements Clarification Whitepaper Version 1.0 Publication Date: February 2020 U.S. Payments Forum ©2020 Page 1 About the U.S. Payments Forum The U.S. Payments Forum, formerly the EMV Migration Forum, is a cross-industry body focused on supporting the introduction and implementation of EMV chip and other new and emerging technologies that protect the security of, and enhance opportunities for payment transactions within the United States. The Forum is the only non-profit organization whose membership includes the entire payments ecosystem, ensuring that all stakeholders have the opportunity to coordinate, cooperate on, and have a voice in the future of the U.S. payments industry. Additional information can be found at http://www.uspaymentsforum.org. EMV ® is a registered trademark in the U.S. and other countries and an unregistered trademark elsewhere. The EMV trademark is owned by EMVCo, LLC. Copyright ©2020 U.S. Payments Forum and Smart Card Alliance. All rights reserved. The U.S. Payments Forum has used best efforts to ensure, but cannot guarantee, that the information described in this document is accurate as of the publication date. The U.S. Payments Forum disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of information in this document. Comments or recommendations for edits or additions to this document should be submitted to: [email protected]. U.S. Payments Forum ©2020 Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Contactless Operating Modes ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Impact of Contactless Operating Mode on Debit Routing Options .............................................. 6 3. Contactless Issuance Requirements ..................................................................................................... 7 4. -
Chip Cards and EMV: Coming Soon
What are the benefits? Chip cards and Chip cards offer a more secure way to process card transactions. The secure microchip contains security EMV: coming soon data and software – because it is more difficult to fraudulently copy the details of the card, security is increased. Accepting chip cards therefore helps you reduce the risk of processing a counterfeit, lost or stolen card. And better card security means fewer disputed transactions. ADB3492 110908 We’re here to help You can find more information about EMV at www.commbank.com.au/emv If you have any further queries about EMV, you can email [email protected] or call our Merchant Help Desk on 1800 022 966, 24 hours, Important information about 7 days a week. your EFTPOS terminal inside What is EMV? What do you need to do? EMV (Europay MasterCard Visa) is the global All you need to do is leave your terminal switched ON electronic transaction standard named after the three overnight from 08 October, and we’ll do the rest. organisations that established it. The EMV standard enables EFTPOS terminals worldwide to process chip-based debit and credit cards. How do you know when To meet EMV standards, the Commonwealth Bank the upgrade is complete? is planning upgrades to its EFTPOS terminals so they can process chip cards. Once you swipe a card that has a chip, your EFTPOS Please note that after the upgrade, you will still be able terminal will prompt you to ‘insert card’ rather than to process cards using the magnetic strip, including ‘swipe card’. -
AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE (Athl) NETWORK EVOLUTION in AMERICAN RETAIL BANKING: WHAT DRIVES IT?
AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE (AThl) NETWORK EVOLUTION IN AMERICAN RETAIL BANKING: WHAT DRIVES IT? Robert J. Kauffiiian Leollard N.Stern School of Busivless New 'r'osk Universit,y Re\\. %sk, Net.\' York 10003 Mary Beth Tlieisen J,eorr;~rd n'. Stcr~iSchool of B~~sincss New \'orl; University New York, NY 10006 C'e~~terfor Rcseai.clt 011 Irlfor~i~ntion Systclns lnfoornlation Systen~sI)epar%ment 1,eojrarcl K.Stelm Sclrool of' Busir~ess New York ITuiversity Working Paper Series STERN IS-91-2 Center for Digital Economy Research Stem School of Business Working Paper IS-91-02 Center for Digital Economy Research Stem School of Business IVorking Paper IS-91-02 AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE (ATM) NETWORK EVOLUTION IN AMERICAN RETAIL BANKING: WHAT DRIVES IT? ABSTRACT The organization of automated teller machine (ATM) and electronic banking services in the United States has undergone significant structural changes in the past two or three years that raise questions about the long term prospects for the retail banking industry, the nature of network competition, ATM service pricing, and what role ATMs will play in the development of an interstate banking system. In this paper we investigate ways that banks use ATM services and membership in ATM networks as strategic marketing tools. We also examine how the changes in the size, number, and ownership of ATM networks (from banks or groups of banks to independent operators) have impacted the structure of ATM deployment in the retail banking industry. Finally, we consider how movement toward market saturation is changing how the public values electronic banking services, and what this means for bankers. -
Everything You Need to Know About Crypto Management Contents
Everything you need to know about Crypto Management Contents The New Data Security Landscape ......................................................................................3 Encryption ..........................................................................................................................3 What About the Cryptographic Keys? ................................................................................4 Building a Crypto Foundation ............................................................................................4 The Four V’s Model ............................................................................................................5 1. Crypto Processing and Acceleration ..............................................................................6 Gemalto Integration Ecosystem ........................................................................................6 2. Key Storage .......................................................................................................................7 Centralized key storage (keys stored in hardware) ..........................................................7 Distributed key storage (keys stored at the endpoints) ....................................................8 3. Key Lifecycle Management .............................................................................................9 Key generation and certification ......................................................................................9 Key distribution ..................................................................................................................9 -
EMF Implementing EMV at The
Implementing EMV®at the ATM: Requirements and Recommendations for the U.S. ATM Community Version 2.0 Date: June 2015 Implementing EMV at the ATM: Requirements and Recommendations for the U.S. ATM Community About the EMV Migration Forum The EMV Migration Forum is a cross-industry body focused on supporting the EMV implementation steps required for global and regional payment networks, issuers, processors, merchants, and consumers to help ensure a successful introduction of more secure EMV chip technology in the United States. The focus of the Forum is to address topics that require some level of industry cooperation and/or coordination to migrate successfully to EMV technology in the United States. For more information on the EMV Migration Forum, please visit http://www.emv- connection.com/emv-migration-forum/. EMV is a trademark owned by EMVCo LLC. Copyright ©2015 EMV Migration Forum and Smart Card Alliance. All rights reserved. The EMV Migration Forum has used best efforts to ensure, but cannot guarantee, that the information described in this document is accurate as of the publication date. The EMV Migration Forum disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of information in this document. Comments or recommendations for edits or additions to this document should be submitted to: ATM- [email protected]. __________________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 Implementing EMV at the ATM: Requirements and Recommendations for the U.S. ATM Community TABLE OF CONTENTS -
Curve - Let’S Get Started
WELCOME TO CURVE - LET’S GET STARTED Nobody wakes up thinking: “I’m looking forward to doing my expenses today”. It’s a boring, time-consuming job for everyone involved; hours wasted every month on data entry, chasing receipts and invoices, and manual reconciliation admin. Wouldn’t it be great if the job was a little smarter? With Curve, you can spend from any of your accounts using just one card, connected straight to Xero. Submit expenses automatically as you pay. Store receipts safely in the cloud. Track budgets on the go. This is expensing as it should be: effortless. Rated excellent on LIFE WITH CURVE + XERO No expense headaches Easier bookkeeping Smarter cashflow Curve: the card built with small businesses, freelancers, and entrepreneurs in mind. WHAT IS CURVE? With Curve, you can spend from anywhere from any of your bank accounts using just one smart Curve card, connected to an even smarter app. Curve works just like a normal bank card, and can be used anywhere in the world that accepts Mastercard. In addition, Curve cardholders collect Curve Rewards points whenever they spend at over 45 leading UK retailers, cut out foreign exchange fees on business trips, and can track their purchase history any time straight from the app. CONNECTING TO XERO WITH CURVE After getting set up with your You can find Xero inside the Tap “Connect to Xero” to new Curve card, securely Curve Connect tab. begin. add your existing debit and credit cards to the app. Log-in to your Xero account. Choose your company’s Get to know the basics. -
APPENDIX G-2.C Credit Card Defaults, Credit Card Profits, and Bankruptcy
APPENDIX G-2.c Credit Card Defaults, Credit Card Profits, and Bankruptcy (Prepared by Professor Lawrence M. Ausubel) Reprinted from The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 71, Spring 1997, pp. 249-270. Copyright 1997 by Lawrence M. Ausubel. Credit Card Defaults, Credit Card Profits, and Bankruptcy by Lawrence M. Ausubel* Credit card defaults have become an increasingly conspicuous feature on the bankruptcy landscape. In 1996, bank credit card delinquencies exceeded 3.5 percent—the highest delinquency rate since 1973, when statistics were first collected.1 Bank credit card chargeoffs also veered upward to 4.5 percent per year, exceeding all but the levels recorded during the years 1991!1992.2 At the same time, personal bankruptcy filings reached a record high 290,111 in the quarter ending September 30, 1996—up thirty-one percent from the corresponding period one year earlier—and surpassed one million for the first year ever in 1996.3 Both credit card defaults and bankruptcies soared amid a generally healthy economy with relatively low unemployment4 and reasonable growth in gross domestic product.5 Wall Street analysts warned that the consumer balance sheet was heading toward a precipice which endangered the health of the banking system, if not the economic expansion generally.6 Bankruptcies and credit card debt have even achieved prominence in the national political debate. In the first 1996 presidential debate, Senator Robert Dole responded to his initial question on the economy by referring to the record bankruptcy rate: *Professor of Economics, University of Maryland at College Park. Copyright 1997. All rights reserved. This Article is based on a paper presented by the author at the Seventieth Annual Meeting of the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges, San Diego, California, October 16-19, 1996. -
PIN Distribution by SMS a SPA’S White Paper
PIN distribution by SMS A SPA’s White paper November 2012 shaping the future of payment technology Table of Contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .............................................................................. 5 2.1. Context ................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Scope .................................................................................................... 5 2.3. Definitions ............................................................................................. 6 2.4. Growing PIN and mobile phone usage ................................................... 6 3. Benefits ..................................................................................... 8 3.1. Generates additional revenues .............................................................. 8 3.1.1. Initial PIN with new payment card ...................................................................... 8 3.1.2. PIN reminder ................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Reduces cost of traditional PIN mailer ................................................ 10 3.3. Improves customer convenience ......................................................... 10 3.4. Enables differentiation ........................................................................ 11 3.5. Mitigates risks of traditional PIN mailer ............................................. -
Merchants Payment Coalition Meeting
Meeting Between Federal Reserve Staff and Merchants Payment Coalition November 2, 2010 Participants: Representatives of the Merchants Payment Coalition (MPC), Walmart, Sears Financial Services, Publix Super Markets, The Kroger Co., Best Buy, 7-11, Charming Shops, and Supervalu. Louise Roseman, David Mills, Robin Prager, Mark Manuszak, Edith Collis, Chris Clubb, Dena Milligan, Joshua Hart, Stephanie Martin, David Stein, and Ky Tran-Trong (Federal Reserve Board); Julia Cheney (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia) Summary: Federal Reserve staff met with representatives of the MPC, merchants and other individuals representing merchants (collectively referred to as "merchants") to discuss the interchange fee provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"). MPC is a trade organization that represents about 2.7 million retail stores. Using prepared materials, representatives of the merchants outlined economic principles of regulation and expressed views as to their preferred approaches for implementing the interchange fee provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Specifically, representatives of the merchants expressed their preference for a presumptive at-par interchange fee, limiting the fraud adjustment to issuer-specific actions that demonstrably prevent fraud, imposing limits on fees charged to merchants, and requiring at least two networks per authorization method on a debit card. A copy of the prepared materials is attached. [note1 A revised version of the materials distributed at the meeting has been attached to this summary at the request of MPC. [end of note.] CONSTANTINE CANNON Jeffrey I. Shinder NEW YORK WASHINGTON Attorney at Law 212-350-2709 [email protected] October 27, 2010 BY E-MAIL Ms.