DOCSLIB.ORG

Caretaker Conventions in Australasia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caretaker Conventions in Australasia Caretaker Conventions in Australasia Minding the Shop for Government Caretaker Conventions in Australasia Minding the Shop for Government Anne Tiernan and Jennifer Menzies Centre for Governance and Public Policy Griffith University Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/caretaker_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Tiernan, Anne, 1968- . Caretaker conventions in Australasia : minding the shop for government. Bibliography. ISBN 9781921313493 (pbk.). ISBN 9781921313509 (web). 1. Public administration - Australia - Decision making. 2. Public administration - New Zealand - Decision making. 3. Public administration - Australia. 4. Public administration - New Zealand. 5. Elections - Australia. 6. Elections - New Zealand. 7. Australia - Politics and government - 2001-. 8. New Zealand - Politics and government - 21st century. I. Menzies, Jennifer. II. Title. (Series : ANZSOG series). 328.9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher. Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2007 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). He is also a joint appointment with the Department of Politics and Public Policy at Griffith University and a principal researcher with two research centres: the Governance and Public Policy Research Centre and the nationally- funded Key Centre in Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance at Griffith University. Professor Wanna has produced around 17 books including two national text books on policy and public management. He has produced a number of research-based studies on budgeting and financial management including: Budgetary Management and Control (1990); Managing Public Expenditure (2000), From Accounting to Accountability (2001) and, most recently, Controlling Public Expenditure (2003). He has just completed a study of state level leadership covering all the state and territory leaders — entitled Yes Premier: Labor leadership in Australia’s states and territories — and has edited a book on Westminster Legacies in Asia and the Pacific —Westminster Legacies: Democracy and responsible government in Asia and the Pacific. He was a chief investigator in a major Australian Research Council funded study of the Future of Governance in Australia (1999-2001) involving Griffith and the ANU. His research interests include Australian and comparative politics, public expenditure and budgeting, and government-business relations. He also writes on Australian politics in newspapers such as The Australian, Courier-Mail and The Canberra Times and has been a regular state political commentator on ABC radio and TV. Table of Contents Author Proles ix Acknowledgements xi Foreword xiii List of abbreviations and acronyms xv Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. What are conventions? 7 Chapter 3. Origins of caretaker conventions 13 Chapter 4. When do the conventions apply? 25 Chapter 5. Caretaker conventions: an overview of Australian jurisdictions 33 Chapter 6. Caretaker conventions: an overview of New Zealand and local government arrangements 53 Chapter 7. Forces inuencing the observance of caretaker conventions 59 Chapter 8. A changing practice? 63 Chapter 9. Caretaker conventions and the future of responsible government 71 Glossary 75 References 77 Appendix A. Dierent approaches – what the jurisdictional guidances say 83 vii Author Profiles Dr Anne Tiernan is an Australian Research Council (ARC) Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre for Governance and Public Policy at Griffith University, and the Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG) Research Program. She has worked in policy roles in both the Commonwealth and Queensland public sectors, and as a policy and research consultant. Dr Tiernan's research interests include: executive advisory arrangements Ð particularly ministerial staffing arrangements and relations between ministerial offices and the public service, policy influence and public policy agenda-setting. Her book, Power Without Responsibility: Ministerial Staffers in Australian Governments from Whitlam to Howard published recently by UNSW Press, examines the implications of the growth of ministerial staffing arrangements, especially its impact on the quality of information and advice to decision-makers. Dr Tiernan is currently working on a major ARC-funded research project investigating the policy advisory capacity of the Australian Public Service (APS) and its ability to support decision-makers through its policy advising functions. Jennifer Menzies is a Director with the consultancy Policy Futures. A former senior executive and Cabinet Secretary within the Queensland Department of the Premier and Cabinet, she was responsible for the development of the government's priorities and the implementation of the government's agenda in all departments. Menzies has had extensive experience in policy development at the State and Commonwealth levels including the latest iteration of the Smart State Policy, the Capital City Policy and the E-Democracy Policy Framework. She is an M.Phil candidate in the School of Politics and Public Policy at Griffith University. Her topic is contemporary political leadership. ix Acknowledgements For an issue that so engages the attention of politicians and public servants for an intense period of about a month every few years, surprisingly little has been published on the topic of caretaker conventions. This monograph draws together research Ð and the guidance documents developed by public service central agencies Ð to address matters of practical concern in managing the business of government during an election campaign. As we show in this monograph, conventions are dynamic. They evolve through experience and political practice. This monograph addresses the theoretical underpinnings of the caretaker principles, traces their progressive institutionalisation in recent decades and examines some contemporary challenges for their interpretation and observance. It is important to note, however, that while our treatment of the guidance documents is currently accurate, they are `live' documents that will adapt and change as experience and events dictate. It will, therefore, be necessary for practitioners and others with an interest in the trajectory of the caretaker conventions to monitor such changes and to consider them in the context of our arguments as laid out here. Our research and understanding of the issues canvassed in this monograph has been assisted by the many Commonwealth, State and Territory officials who generously spoke to us about their experience of the caretaker conventions and reviewed sections of the manuscript. The 2006 Queensland election provided an opportunity to test some of our ideas and arguments through workshops organised by the Institute for Public Administration Australia (IPAA) Queensland Division. Thanks to IPAA and the Department of the Premier and Cabinet. We are grateful to Professor John Wanna of the ANZSOG research program, who engaged us to undertake this research with a practitioner readership in mind and helped conceptualise and shape the manuscript. Special thanks to John Nethercote and Jonathan Boston for helpful comments on the draft and to John Butcher for his editing and deft management of the production process. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the generous support of the Centre for Governance and Public Policy at Griffith University for allowing us to complete this work alongside other research commitments. Anne Tiernan and Jennifer Menzies September 2007 xi Foreword Andrew Podger National President Institute of Public Administration Australia This monograph is the first of a planned series over the next few years as a joint venture between IPAA and ANZSOG. ANZSOG is a unique collaboration amongst Australasian governments and higher education institutions to develop emerging leaders in the public sector and to support research on contemporary public policy and management issues. IPAA is the national association of those whose profession is public administration, promoting high standards and continuous professional development and disseminating research and practitioner experience through its journals and its seminars and conferences. The two organisations are natural partners. Participants in ANZSOG programs are encouraged to be members and supporters of IPAA. Both are keen to promote research and to share lessons from practical experience. IPAA is particularly keen to sponsor work that provides guidance on professional standards in public administration. IPAA's Queensland Division has been taking the lead in developing some initial documents canvassing the standards that might apply today in such fields as values-based management and whistleblower arrangements. This monograph by Anne Tiernan and Jennifer Menzies represents a substantial review of the rules and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political Finance in Australia
    Political finance in Australia: A skewed and secret system Prepared by Sally Young and Joo-Cheong Tham for the Democratic Audit of Australia School of Social Sciences The Australian National University Report No.7 Table of contents An immigrant society PAGE ii The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be The Democratic Audit of Australia vii PAGE iii taken to represent the views of either the Democratic Audit of Australia or The Tables iv Australian National University Figures v Abbreviations v © The Australian National University 2006 Executive Summary ix National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data 1 Money, politics and the law: Young, Sally. Questions for Australian democracy Political Joo-Cheong Tham 1 Bibliography 2 Private funding of political parties Political finance in Australia: a skewed and secret system. Joo-Cheong Tham 8 ISBN 0 9775571 0 3 (pbk). 3 Public funding of political parties Sally Young 36 ISBN 0 9775571 1 1 (online). 4 Government and the advantages of office 1. Campaign funds - Australia. I. Tham, Joo-Cheong. II. Sally Young 61 Australian National University. Democratic Audit of 5 Party expenditure Australia. III. Title. (Series: Democratic Audit of Sally Young 90 Australia focussed audit; 7). 6 Questions for reform Joo-Cheong Tham and Sally Young 112 324.780994 7 Conclusion: A skewed and secret system 140 An online version of this paper can be found by going to the Democratic Audit of Australia website at: http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au References and further
    [Show full text]
  • The Kiwi That Roared: Nuclear-Free New Zealand in a Nuclear-Armed World
    Wade Huntley THE KIWI THAT ROARED: NUCLEAR-FREE NEW ZEALAND IN A NUCLEAR-ARMED WORLD by Wade Huntley Dr. Wade Huntley is Program Director for Asia/Pacific Security at the Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development in Berkeley, California, where he produces the Northeast Asian Peace and Security Network’s Daily Report (www.nautilus.org). He has an article in the March 1996 issue of International Studies Quarterly and is working on a book based on his doctoral dissertation, “The Citizen and the Sword: Security and Democracy in the Liberal State.” The University of California’s Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation provided support for research on this article. n July 14, 1984, New policy was widely criticized as a evance to larger democracies, is that Zealand elected its fourth frivolous moral exercise indulging a mass public is ill-suited to make O Labour government and vocal anti-nuclear activists and play- wise and prudent decisions regard- thus brought into effect its policy de- ing on an impassioned and unin- ing state security. Recent research claring the country “nuclear free,” formed public, while needlessly on this subject indicates that popu- which included prohibiting port entry jeopardizing the country’s national lar opinion is not as volatile and in- by any ships either under nuclear interests and sacrificing its ANZUS coherent, nor its effects on security power or carrying nuclear weapons.1 alliance relationship with the United policy as pernicious, as once The government’s commitment to States.3 This judgment is rooted in thought. However, many of these this policy reached a moment of truth two converging claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence
    Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence Editor Dr Claire Breen Editor: Dr Claire Breen Administrative Assistance: Janine Pickering The Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence is published annually by the University of Waikato School of Law. Subscription to the Yearbook costs $NZ35 (incl gst) per year in New Zealand and $US40 (including postage) overseas. Advertising space is available at a cost of $NZ200 for a full page and $NZ100 for a half page. Back numbers are available. Communications should be addressed to: The Editor Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence School of Law The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand North American readers should obtain subscriptions directly from the North American agents: Gaunt Inc Gaunt Building 3011 Gulf Drive Holmes Beach, Florida 34217-2199 Telephone: 941-778-5211, Fax: 941-778-5252, Email: [email protected] This issue may be cited as (2008-2009) Vols 11-12 Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence. All rights reserved ©. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1994, no part may be reproduced by any process without permission of the publisher. ISSN No. 1174-4243 Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence Volumes 11 & 12 (combined) 2008 & 2009 Contents NEW ZEALAND’S FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH CHINA IN CONTEXT: DEMONSTRATING LEADERSHIP IN A GLOBALISED WORLD Hon Jim McLay CNZM QSO 1 CHINA TRANSFORMED: FTA, SOCIALISATION AND GLOBALISATION Yongjin Zhang 15 POLITICAL SPEECH AND SEDITION The Right Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer 36 THE UNINVITED GUEST: THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA IN AN OPEN DEMOCRACY Karl du Fresne 52 TERRORISM, PROTEST AND THE LAW: IN A MARITIME CONTEXT Dr Ron Smith 61 RESPONDING TO THE ECONOMIC CRISIS: A QUESTION OF LAW, POLICY OR POLITICS Margaret Wilson 74 WHO DECIDES WHERE A DECEASED PERSON WILL BE BURIED – TAKAMORE REVISITED Nin Tomas 81 Editor’s Introduction This combined issue of the Yearbook arises out of public events that were organised by the School of Law (as it was then called) in 2008 and 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets, Rights and Power in Australian Social Policy Cilities Have Been Sold to Private Organisations), but Other Marketising Instruments Have Been More Common
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship 1 The politics of market encroachment: Policymaker rationales and voter responses Gabrielle Meagher and Shaun Wilson In recent decades, market ideas and practices have increasingly en- croached on activities previously organised by different logics, primar- ily the bureaucratic logic of the public sector and the associational logics of churches and non-government organisations. One highly vis- ible trend has been privatisation of public assets. Universally accessed public utilities in telecommunications, energy and water have been sold off, along with publicly owned financial institutions and transport car- riers. Less visible, but no less important, has been the marketisation of publicly funded social services. The growing use of contracts, com- petition, and quasi-vouchers to allocate funds and service users to the organisations that provide services are examples of this development. Another has been the disproportionate growth of the share of for-profit providers in Australia’s mixed economy of social services. In Australian social policy, market practices and organisations have played an increasingly significant role in shaping the delivery of ser- vices, but in ways that ordinary voters may not identify as connected to ‘privatisation’, understood as asset sales. Asset sales have also taken place in social services (for example, publicly owned residential care fa- Meagher G. & Wilson S. 2015, ‘The politics of market encroachment: policy maker rationales and voter responses’, in Markets, rights and power in Australian social pol- icy, eds G. Meagher & S. Goodwin, Sydney University Press, Sydney. 29 Markets, Rights and Power in Australian Social Policy cilities have been sold to private organisations), but other marketising instruments have been more common.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring New Zealand's Constitution Is Fit for Purpose
    July 2013 Submission Ensuring New Zealand’s Constitution is Fit for Purpose Submission to the Constitutional Advisory Panel ΞDĐ'ƵŝŶŶĞƐƐ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ>ŝŵŝƚĞĚϮϬϭϯ /^EϵϳϴͲϭͲϵϳϮϭϵϯͲϯϳͲϮ;ƉĂƉĞƌďĂĐŬͿ /^EϵϳϴͲϭͲϵϳϮϭϵϯͲϯϴͲϵ;W&Ϳ WKŽdžϮϰϮϮϮ tĞůůŝŶŐƚŽŶϲϭϰϮ EĞǁĞĂůĂŶĚ ǁǁǁ͘ŵĐŐƵŝŶŶĞƐƐŝŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ͘ŽƌŐ ďŽƵƚƚŚĞDĐ'ƵŝŶŶĞƐƐ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ The McGuinness Institute is a non-partisan, not-for-profit research organisation specialising in issues that affect New Zealand’s long term future. Founded in 2004, the Institute aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about how to progress this nation through the production of timely, comprehensive and evidence-based research and the sharing of ideas. This can take a number of forms including books, reports, working papers, think pieces, workshops and videos. ďŽƵƚƚŚĞƵƚŚŽƌ Wendy McGuinness Wendy McGuinness is the founder and chief executive of the McGuinness Institute. Originally from the King Country, Wendy completed her secondary schooling at Hamilton Girls’ High School and Edgewater College. She then went on to study at Manukau Technical Institute (gaining an NZCC), Auckland University (BCom) and Otago University (MBA), as well as completing additional environmental papers at Massey University. As a Fellow Chartered Accountant (FCA) specialising in risk management, Wendy has worked in both the public and private sectors. In 2004 she established the McGuinness Institute (formerly the Sustainable Future Institute) as a way of contributing to New Zealand’s long-term future. She has also co-authored a book, Nation Dates: Significant events that have shaped the nation of New Zealand. tŝƚŚŽŶƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶƐĨƌŽŵ Sylvia Avery Sylvia Avery is a practicing primary school teacher who recently graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in Theatre and Politics and a Graduate Diploma in Teaching (Primary).
    [Show full text]
  • Drafting a Constitution for the 21St Century Dean Knight and Julia Whaipooti
    NEW ZEALAND CENTRE FOR PUBLIC LAW NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL Te Wänanga o ngä Kaupapa Ture ä Iwi o Aotearoa New Zealand Journal of NZCPL OCCASIONAL PAPERS NZCPL OCCASIONAL PAPERS 1 Workways of the United States Supreme Court 1 Work wJusticeays of Ruththe United Bader GinsbuStatesNZCPL rSupremeg OCCASIONAL Court PAPERS Justice2 RuthThe RoleBader of Ginsbu the Newrg Zealand Law Commission Public and International Law NZCPL OCCASIONAL PAPERS 1 W orkwJusticeays of David the United Baragwanath States Supreme Court 2 TheJustice Role Ruth of the Bader New Ginsbu Zealandrg Law Commission Justice31 DavidWLegislatureork wBaragwanathays ofv Executithe Unitedve-The States Struggle Supreme Continues: Court Observations on the 2 The Role of the New Zealand Law Commission JusticeWork ofRuth the BaderRegulations Ginsbu rReviewg Committee 3 LegislatureJustice David v ExecutiBaragwanathve-The Struggle Continues: Observations on the Work 2 ofTheHon the RoleDoug Regulations of Kidd the New Review Zealand Committee Law Commission 3 Legislature v Executive-The Struggle Continues: Observations on the Hon4 DougJusticeThe Kidd Maori David Land Baragwanath Court-A Separate Legal System? W ork Chiefof the Judge Regulations Joe Williams Review Committee 4 TheHon3 Maori DougLegislature LandKidd Court- v ExecutiA Separateve-The LegalStruggle System? Continues: Observations on the Chief 5 JudgeWTheork JoeRole of W the ofilliams theRegulations Secretary Review of the Cabinet Committee-The View
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Annual Meeting
    Notice of Annual Meeting Notice is given that the Annual Meeting of shareholders of Metlifecare Limited will be held at All Seasons Ellerslie Motor Inn, 95 Greenlane East Road, Remuera, Auckland, on Thursday, 23 October 2008, commencing at 11.00am. ORDINARY BUSINESS Annual Meeting Minutes (Ordinary Resolution) 1. To approve the minutes of the last Annual Meeting held on 1 November 2007. Chairman’s and Chief Executive Officer’s Report and Financial Statements 2. To receive and consider the Chairman’s and Chief Executive Officer’s Report, Financial Statements and the Auditors’ Report for the year ended 30 June 2008. Rotation and Election of Directors (Ordinary Resolutions) 3. In accordance with the Company’s constitution, Hon. James Kenneth McLay, CNZM, QSO and Mr John James Loughlin retire by rotation and being eligible, offer themselves for re-election. Mr Mark Alexander Gibson being appointed during the year by the Board, holds office under the constitution only until the Annual Meeting and being eligible, offers himself for election. (Refer Directors’ Profiles on pages two and three of this Notice.) Auditors (Ordinary Resolution) 4. To record the automatic re-appointment of the Auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers and to authorise the Directors to fix their remuneration for the current year. VOTING BY PROXY All shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting are entitled to appoint a proxy to attend and vote for them instead. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. A proxy form is enclosed and, if used, must be lodged at the offices of the Company’s Share Registrar, Computershare Investor Services Limited (see proxy form for the address), not less than 48 hours before the time for the holding of the meeting (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003 PRESIDENT’S REVIEW
    NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY 107th Annual Report & Statement of Accounts for the year ended 30 November 2003 New Zealand Law Society Council 2003-2004 Back row, from left: Ron Pol (CLANZ President), David Clarke (Wellington DLS Executive Director), Bernie Rowe (for Murray Hunt, Marlborough), John Marshall (Wellington), John Brandts-Giesen (for Tom Weston QC, Canterbury), Alan Ritchie (NZLS Executive Director), Raynor Asher QC (NZLS Vice-President), Paul Coe (Wanganui), Tony Sullivan (Westland), Denys Barry (Gisborne), John Young (for Richard Russell, Southland), Stuart Webster (Hawke’s Bay), Stuart Rose (NZLS Board), Nevin Dawson (NZLS Vice-President to 10/03). Third row, from left: Keith Berman (Auckland), David Burns (Family Law Section Chair), Stephen Bryers (Auckland), Len Andersen (Otago), Jacqui Gray (NZLS Board), Kevin Kilgour (Auckland), Kit Clews (Waikato Bay of Plenty). Second row, from left: Keith de Ridder (for Manawatu), Chris Moore (Property Law Section Chair), Janine McMurdo (Southland DLS Secretary), Anne Stevens (Otago), Kate Davenport (Auckland), Margaret Malcolm (Auckland DLS Executive Director), Benedict Ryan (Waikato Bay of Plenty DLS Executive Officer). Front, from left: Geoff Brodie (Canterbury), Graeme Downing (Nelson), Emma Smith (Taranaki), Sue Styants (NZLS Board), Pam Davidson (Wellington), Christine Grice (NZLS President to 10/03), Ann Wilson (NZLS Vice-President), Chris Darlow (NZLS President from 11/03). Absent: Kerry Ayers (Canterbury), Ken Daniels (Wellington), Warwick Deuchrass (NZLS Vice-President & Treasurer),
    [Show full text]
  • Mcguinness Institute Draft 2X 6
    1984 And All That Hon Jim McLay1 New Zealand Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations Opening Address EmpowerNZ Workshop: Drafting a Constitution for the 21st Century Beehive Banquet Hall, Parliament Buildings, Wellington Tuesday 28 August, 2012; 8:30 AM Introduction After that warm introduction from Paul Goldsmith, I should immediately set the record straight and confess that I'm not a professional diplomat. I started out as a lawyer, but I found that wasn't very popular; so I became a politician, and found that wasn't very popular; so I became an investment banker (and we know how popular bankers are!). It's 25 years - almost to the day – since I walked out of this place to discover if there is a life after politics; eventually, to emerge as New Zealand's Ambassador to the United Nations; a diplomatic assignment which basically requires me to do two things– • First, to lead a team of experts – and, when I say "experts", I really mean experts – real specialists in international peace and security, disarmament (nuclear and conventional), human rights, development, environment, funding, legal, oceans, 1 The opinions expressed in this address are mine alone and do not represent the views of the New Zealand Government or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of a number of friends and colleagues who either scrutinised and commented on early drafts of this address and/or offered specific comments for inclusion; notably, Marcy McLay, Denis McLay and Sir Geoffrey Palmer. All added greatly to the substance of this text.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmer Speech on Official Information Act.Pdf
    A HARD LOOK AT THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE WITH THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT AFTER 25 YEARS Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Palmer President, Law Commission Address to International Conference of Information Commissioners, Wellington, 27 November 2007 I. INTRODUCTION 1 New Zealand’s Official Information Act 1982 (“OIA”) has now been in force for 25 years.1 In some respects, the writer was present at its creation, serving on the Select Committee in Parliament that dealt with the Bill and as Opposition Spokesman, and later, when in government, as Minister of Justice. As Minister of Justice, I oversaw a number of amendments to the Act. The most significant change was to the ministerial veto. Changes were made to ensure that the veto was a Cabinet decision, not an individual ministerial decision. That change effectively put a stop to the use of veto. The political cost was too high. Furthermore, the Act and its principles were adapted to Local Government and a separate Act under the stewardship of the Hon Dr Michael Bassett, the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 was passed. 2 Much of the credit for the OIA should go to then Minister of Justice and Attorney- General, the Honourable Jim McLay. He managed to achieve passage of the bill in face of opposition from both his Prime Minister and the Treasury. The Treasury opposed the Bill at the Select Committee, no doubt with the permission of and on the instruction of the Minister of Finance who was also the Prime Minister, the Rt Hon Sir Robert Muldoon. The Prime Minister said the Act would be a “nine day wonder”.2 3 The Danks Committee that devised the policy comprised a mixed membership of public servants and outsiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflecting on Elections Past Keith Rankin, 23 September 2014
    Reflecting on Elections Past Keith Rankin, 23 September 2014 There are a number of past elections that can give the left in New Zealand guidance and hope. Two major points though. Major parties require leaders who can bridge the political divide through strength of personality, vision of what it means to lead a good life in a sustainable way, and adherence to policy that supports such a vision. Possibly the only person who can do this for the left is David Shearer, now a more plausible leader than in 2012. He received a stunning personal vote in Mt Albert; a vote that suggests an appeal that goes well beyond party politics. I sense that Shearer is not dogmatic on economic issues, meaning that he might be open to a new approach. Before taking kneejerk responses to change leaders, however, parties should always take time to reflect on the issues, as my review below of prescient past elections shows. 1969-72 1969 should have been a dead cert election for Labour. Indeed Labour would have won despite itself had the election been in 1968, a year that the economy tanked. 1969 was our first election for which TV coverage was pivotal. And it was the first time the 'sixties' generation had an impact on politics. While Kim Dotcom was the joker in the pack this year, in 1969 it was Tim Shadbolt and the PYM (Progressive Youth Movement). This youth activism in New Zealand followed the huge influence of the protest movements in the USA and France in 1968. The television and radio coverage showed a continuous barrage of shouting at National Party leaders, especially Keith Holyoake, Jack Marshall, and Rob Muldoon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 – Off to a Wobbly Start the Political Year Ahead Old
    HUGO Assessing the economic and political environmentvision in New Zealand Confidential to January 22 2016 HUGO members 2016 – off to a wobbly start Pages 4, 5, &6 The next few months will test both the govt’s and opposition parties’ capacity to read the economic runes. Local data remain strong, even if inflation is lower than it should be, but the global economy looks suddenly far more fragile again, prompting new ‘crisis’ talk. The political year ahead Page 2 National needs to reinvigorate and demonstrate it has the mojo and ideas for a fourth electoral term, but the far greater political challenge is on the left. Labour settled down under Andrew Little in 2015. In 2016, it needs to re-establish what it stands for with a refreshed policy platform. Without that, 2017 will be a difficult election year for Little. Old campaigners look to another term Page 3 A mark of the growing sense among National MPs of the potential for a fourth term is the likely postponement of retirement announcements by some of its most experienced hands. Bill English, long tipped to go in 2017, now looks almost certain to throw in his lot for the 2017-2020 term. Global gloom Page 4 The bears are in the ascendant at the Davos World Economic Forum and elsewhere, with a growing chorus of commentary about the potential for global economic imbalances to spill over into the next chapter of the GFC. We say that’s over-blown, but must be watched closely. The post-GFC experiment in money-printing has a way to run yet.
    [Show full text]