DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment Form Local Government Performance Assessment Nakaseke District (Vote Code: 569) Assessment Scores Crosscutting Minimum Conditions 59% Education Minimum Conditions 40% Health Minimum Conditions 50% Water & Environment Minimum Conditions 20% Micro-scale Irrigation Minimum Conditions 0% Crosscutting Performance Measures 35% Educational Performance Measures 28% Health Performance Measures 28% Water & Environment Performance Measures 41% Micro-scale Irrigation Performance Measures 27% 569 Crosscutting Performance Nakaseke Measures 2020 District Summary of Definition of No. Compliance justification Score requirements compliance Local Government Service Delivery Results 1 0 Service Delivery • Evidence that There was no complete evidence that Nakaseke District Outcomes of DDEG infrastructure projects Local Government infrastructure projects were investments implemented using implemented using DDEG funding are functional and DDEG funding are utilized as per the purpose of the project(s) as per Maximum 4 points on functional and utilized as design/profile. this performance per the purpose of the measure project(s): The district planner retired and the acting Planner was sick. The commercial officer who took care of the • If so: Score 4 or else 0 assessment could not provide full details. 2 0 Service Delivery a. If the average score in Not applicable. Performance the overall LLG performance assessment Maximum 6 points on increased from previous this performance assessment : measure o by more than 10%: Score 3 o 5-10% increase: Score 2 o Below 5 % Score 0 2 3 Service Delivery b. Evidence that the Procurement and installation of wireless Internet UGX Performance DDEG funded investment 10,000,000 100% complete projects implemented in Maximum 6 points on the previous FY were Retooling of District council hall UGX 9,200,000 this performance completed as per Completion of Kinyogonga Cattle loading site UGX measure performance contract 11,500,000 (with AWP) by end of the FY. Fencing of Kapeka Health Center III UGX 30,000,000 100% completion • If 100% the projects were completed : Score 3 Construction of 2 lined pit latrines UGX 30,000,000 100% completion • If 80-99%: Score 2 Supply of 3 laptops and one external disk UGX • If below 80%: 0 7,526,949 Completed The project completion was 100% 3 0 Investment a. If the LG budgeted and There was no complete evidence that Nakaseke District Performance spent all the DDEG for Local Government budgeted and spent all the DDEG for the previous FY on the FY 2019/2020 within the eligible expenditures as Maximum 4 points on eligible projects/activities defined in the DDEG guidelines. this performance as per the DDEG grant, measure budget, and The district planner retired and the acting Planner was implementation sick. The commercial officer who took care of the guidelines: assessment could not provide full details. Score 2 or else score 0. 3 2 Investment b. If the variations in the The variations in the contract price to for all the DDEG Performance contract price for sample projects reviewed was within +/-20% of the LG of DDEG funded Engineers estimates Maximum 4 points on infrastructure investments this performance for the previous FY are 3 DDEG projects sampled measure within +/-20% of the LG These are the details of the projects reviewed. Engineers estimates, 1. Construction of 2 5-Stance Latrines at Mpuge and score 2 or else score 0 Nvunanwa P/S in Semuto Sub-County Contract No: NAKA569/Wrks/19-20/0006 Approved under: Min 23/Naka/DCC/March/19-20 Contract Price: 34,548,332 Engineer’s Estimate:30,000,000 Price Variation: 4,548,332 Percent Variation: 15.16% Comment: Variation below 20% 2. 4 Unit Staff House and a 4-Stance Lined VIP latrine with bath shelters at Butalangu HC III Contract No: NAKA569/Wrks/19-20/00012 Approved under: Min 17/Naka/DCC/Oct/19-20 Contract Price: 121,176,926 Engineer’s Estimate: Not seen Payments so far: 60,344,846 Price Variation: Not quantifiable. Project still ongoing 3. 2 Classroom Block at Kivumu Primary School in Kito Sub-county Contract No: NAKA569/Wrks/19-20/00002 Approved under: Min 17/Naka/DCC/Sept/19-20 Contract Price: 61,736,904 Engineer’s Estimate:60,800,000 Price Variation: 936,904 Percent Variation: 1.54% Comment: Variation below 20% Performance Reporting and Performance Improvement 4 2 Accuracy of reported a. Evidence that There was evidence that information on the positions information information on the filled in LLGs as per minimum staffing standards is positions filled in LLGs accurate. Information was got by comparing the staff Maximum 4 points on as per minimum staffing lists of the 3 LLGs sampled namely Nakaseke Sub this Performance standards is accurate, county, Nakaseke Town Council and Kito Sub county Measure with the Staff structure at the District. score 2 or else score 0 4 0 Accuracy of reported b. Evidence that There was no evidence of any report for the information infrastructure constructed infrastructure constructed using the DDEG was using the DDEG is in produced by the LG: Maximum 4 points on place as per reports this Performance produced by the LG: Measure • If 100 % in place: Score 2, else score 0. Note: if there are no reports produced to review: Score 0 5 0 Reporting and a. Evidence that the LG Not applicable. Performance conducted a credible Improvement assessment of LLGs as verified during the Maximum 8 points on National Local this Performance Government Measure Performance Assessment Exercise; If there is no difference in the assessment results of the LG and national assessment in all LLGs score 4 or else 0 5 0 Reporting and b. The District/ There was no evidence that the District has developed Performance Municipality has performance improvement plans for at least 30% of the Improvement developed performance lowest performing LLGs for the current FY, based on the improvement plans for at previous assessment results. Maximum 8 points on least 30% of the lowest this Performance performing LLGs for the Measure current FY, based on the previous assessment results. Score: 2 or else score 0 5 0 Reporting and c. The District/ No implementation of the PIP for the 30 % lowest Performance Municipality has performing LLGs in the previous FY was done. Improvement implemented the PIP for the 30 % lowest Maximum 8 points on performing LLGs in the this Performance previous FY: Measure Score 2 or else score 0 Human Resource Management and Development 6 0 Budgeting for and a. Evidence that the LG There was no evidence that LG consolidated and actual recruitment and has consolidated and submitted the staffing requirements for the coming FY to deployment of staff submitted the staffing the MOPS by September 30th. requirements for the Maximum 2 points on coming FY to the MoPS The explanation was that they fell short of the wage bill this Performance by September 30th, with and without wage no recruitment can be made. Measure copy to the respective MDAs and MoFPED. Score 2 or else score 0 7 2 Performance a. Evidence that the The District conducted a tracking and analysis of staff management District/Municipality has attendance (as guided by Ministry of Public Service conducted a tracking and CSI): Maximum 5 points on analysis of staff this Performance attendance (as guided by There were monthly attendance records for staff. For Measure Ministry of Public Service example; CSI): Monthly attendance records for staff at the District Head Score 2 or else score 0 quarters for the months of; July 2019, August 2019, September 2019, November 2019, December 2019, January 2020, March 2020, April 2020, May 2020 and June 2020 among others. 7 0 Performance i. Evidence that the LG Only 3 HoDs were appraised as per guidelines issued management has conducted an by MoPS during the previous FY. appraisal with the Maximum 5 points on following features: These include; this Performance Measure HODs have been District production officer Kikonyogo Francis was appraised as per appraised on 8/8/2020, guidelines issued by District Community Development Officer Batalingaya MoPS during the Denis was appraised on 17/6/2020 and previous DEO Batanudde Stephen was appraised on 6/8/2020. FY: Score 1 or else 0 The rest lacked appraisal reports in their appraisal files. These included; Ag CFO, Ag District Planner, Ag District Engineer, DNRO, District Commercial Officer and Ag DHO. 7 1 Performance ii. (in addition to “a” The administrative rewards and sanctions were management above) has also implemented on time as provided for in the guidelines. implemented For example there was a report on rewards and Maximum 5 points on administrative rewards sanctions dated 17th/10/2019, where one Isogoli this Performance and sanctions on time as Emmanuel absconded duty and was told to write a Measure provided for in the commitment letter to that note. The report indicates that guidelines: he wrote the letter and the case was dropped. Score 1 or else 0 7 0 Performance iii. Has established a There was no evidence that the LG established a management Consultative Committee functional Consultative Committee (CC) for staff (CC) for staff grievance grievance redress. Maximum 5 points on redress which is this Performance functional. Measure Score 1 or else 0 8 1 Payroll management a. Evidence that 100% of From the documents provided, 100% of the staff the staff recruited during recruited during the previous FY accessed the salary Maximum 1 point on the previous FY have payroll not later than two months after appointment. this Performance accessed the salary Measure or else score payroll not later than two All the Education Assistants (Nalukwago Milka, 0 months after Nabweggamu Aminah, Senono John, Mukiibi Benedict, appointment: Nabukenya Barbra, Kyazike Juliet, Nakijoba Harriet, Sserwadda Henry, Lubanga Robert, Nanyonjo Barbra, Score 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nakaseke Constituency: 109 Nakaseke South County
    Printed on: Monday, January 18, 2021 16:36:23 PM PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, (Presidential Elections Act, 2005, Section 48) RESULTS TALLY SHEET DISTRICT: 069 NAKASEKE CONSTITUENCY: 109 NAKASEKE SOUTH COUNTY Parish Station Reg. AMURIAT KABULETA KALEMBE KATUMBA KYAGULA MAO MAYAMBA MUGISHA MWESIGYE TUMUKUN YOWERI Valid Invalid Total Voters OBOI KIIZA NANCY JOHN NYI NORBERT LA WILLY MUNTU FRED DE HENRY MUSEVENI Votes Votes Votes PATRICK JOSEPH LINDA SSENTAMU GREGG KAKURUG TIBUHABU ROBERT U RWA KAGUTA Sub-county: 001 KAASANGOMBE 014 BUKUUKU 01 TIMUNA/KAFENE 716 1 0 1 0 278 2 0 1 0 1 140 424 43 467 0.24% 0.00% 0.24% 0.00% 65.57% 0.47% 0.00% 0.24% 0.00% 0.24% 33.02% 9.21% 65.22% 02 LUKYAMU PR. SCHOOL 778 2 2 0 1 348 2 2 0 1 0 110 468 24 492 0.43% 0.43% 0.00% 0.21% 74.36% 0.43% 0.43% 0.00% 0.21% 0.00% 23.50% 4.88% 63.24% 03 BUKUUKU PRI. SCHOOL 529 0 0 1 1 188 0 1 0 0 0 74 265 3 268 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.38% 70.94% 0.00% 0.38% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 27.92% 1.12% 50.66% Parish Total 2023 3 2 2 2 814 4 3 1 1 1 324 1157 70 1227 0.26% 0.17% 0.17% 0.17% 70.35% 0.35% 0.26% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 28.00% 5.70% 60.65% 015 BULYAKE 01 NJAGALABWAMI COMM.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:569 Nakaseke District Quarter4
    Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2019/20 Vote:569 Nakaseke District Quarter4 Terms and Conditions I hereby submit Quarter 4 performance progress report. This is in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the letter appointing me as an Accounting Officer for Vote:569 Nakaseke District for FY 2019/20. I confirm that the information provided in this report represents the actual performance achieved by the Local Government for the period under review. Katotoroma John Date: 25/08/2020 cc. The LCV Chairperson (District) / The Mayor (Municipality) 1 Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2019/20 Vote:569 Nakaseke District Quarter4 Summary: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Overall Revenue Performance Ushs Thousands Approved Budget Cumulative Receipts % of Budget Received Locally Raised Revenues 1,920,021 666,949 35% Discretionary Government 3,701,682 3,677,141 99% Transfers Conditional Government Transfers 21,605,823 22,182,854 103% Other Government Transfers 1,888,246 1,870,522 99% External Financing 412,232 443,506 108% Total Revenues shares 29,528,003 28,840,972 98% Overall Expenditure Performance by Workplan Ushs Thousands Approved Cumulative Cumulative % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget Releases Expenditure Released Spent Spent Administration 2,844,971 3,958,380 3,863,561 139% 136% 98% Finance 920,368 465,593 465,593 51% 51% 100% Statutory Bodies 1,278,586 708,290 704,680 55% 55% 99% Production and Marketing 1,199,600 1,106,894 1,106,893 92% 92% 100% Health 6,782,333 6,994,819 6,650,197 103% 98% 95% Education 13,126,979
    [Show full text]
  • 1 / 14 Presidential Elections, 2016
    Tuesday, February 23, 2016 14:12:12 PM Received Station: 27881/28010 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 2016 (Presidential Elections Act, 2005, Section 48) RESULTS TALLY SHEET DISTRICT: 069 NAKASEKE CONSTITUENCY: 109 NAKASEKE SOUTH COUNTY Parish Station Reg. ABED AMAMA BARYAMUREEB BENON BUTA KIZZA MABIRIZI MAUREEN YOWERI Valid Invalid Total Voters BWANIKA MBABAZI A VENANSIUS BIRAARO BESIGYE JOSEPH FAITH KYALYA KAGUTA Votes Votes Votes KIFEFE WALUUBE MUSEVENI Sub-county: 001 KAASANGOMBE 014 BUKUUKU 01 TIMUNA/KAFENE 519 5 2 0 2 127 2 1 237 376 27 403 1.33% 0.53% 0.00% 0.53% 33.78% 0.53% 0.27% 63.03% 6.70% 77.65% 02 LUKYAMU PR. SCHOOL 682 10 6 3 0 216 5 2 273 515 26 541 1.94% 1.17% 0.58% 0.00% 41.94% 0.97% 0.39% 53.01% 4.81% 79.33% 03 BUKUUKU PRI. SCHOOL 490 3 5 5 1 125 2 0 198 339 9 348 0.88% 1.47% 1.47% 0.29% 36.87% 0.59% 0.00% 58.41% 2.59% 71.02% Parish Total 1691 18 13 8 3 468 9 3 708 1230 62 1292 1.46% 1.06% 0.65% 0.24% 38.05% 0.73% 0.24% 57.56% 4.80% 76.40% 015 BULYAKE 01 NJAGALABWAMI COMM. HALL 668 9 2 5 0 170 2 0 303 491 25 516 (A-NAJ) 1.83% 0.41% 1.02% 0.00% 34.62% 0.41% 0.00% 61.71% 4.84% 77.25% 02 NAMASUJJU P/S 681 5 2 2 2 183 0 1 266 461 34 495 1.08% 0.43% 0.43% 0.43% 39.70% 0.00% 0.22% 57.70% 6.87% 72.69% 03 NJAGALABWAMI COMM.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2021/22 Vote:569 Nakaseke District
    LG Approved Budget Estimates Vote:569 Nakaseke District FY 2021/22 Part I: Local Government Budget Estimates A1: Revenue Performance and Plans by Source Current Budget Performance Uganda Shillings Thousands Approved Budget for Cumulative Receipts by Approved Budget for FY 2020/21 End March for FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 Locally Raised Revenues 885,462 602,074 1,516,272 o/w Higher Local Government 885,462 602,074 903,202 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 613,070 Discretionary Government Transfers 3,731,653 3,099,212 4,333,192 o/w Higher Local Government 3,039,928 2,488,958 3,374,902 o/w Lower Local Government 691,725 610,255 958,289 Conditional Government Transfers 25,075,684 19,818,062 26,567,954 o/w Higher Local Government 25,075,684 19,818,062 26,567,954 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 Other Government Transfers 2,501,365 1,045,582 2,023,397 o/w Higher Local Government 2,501,365 1,045,582 2,023,397 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 External Financing 130,000 51,005 245,353 o/w Higher Local Government 130,000 51,005 245,353 o/w Lower Local Government 0 0 0 Grand Total 32,324,164 24,615,936 34,686,168 o/w Higher Local Government 31,632,439 24,005,682 33,114,809 o/w Lower Local Government 691,725 610,255 1,571,359 A2: Summary of Programme Allocations For FY 2020/21 Other Central Locally Raised Government External Ushs Thousands Government Total Revenues (LRR) Transfers Financing Transfers (GoU) (OGT) Agro-Industrialisation 3,306,177 14,591 0 0 3,320,768 o/w: Wage: 651,921 0 0 0 651,921 Non-Wage Reccurent: 1,388,109 14,591 0 0 1,402,700 Development:
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Abstract
    UGANDA BUREAU OF STATISTICS THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA 2013 STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Uganda Bureau of Statistics Statistics House Plot 9, Colville Street P.O Box 7186 Kampala August, 2013 Tel: 256 -41- 706000 Fax: 256- 41- 237553 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ubos.org ; UGANDA BUREAU OF STATISTICS 2013 STATISTICAL ABSTRACT FOREWORD The Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) is committed to the production and dissemination of integrated statistical information that meet the international standards quality requirements. This Statistical Abstract is UBOS’s prime annual publication through which key statistical information derived from the latest surveys, censuses and administrative records of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) is disseminated. The information presented in the 2013 Statistical Abstract covers statistics on the Environment, Demographic, Socio-economic, Production and Macroeconomic sectors. Some of the information on these sectors is presented basing on a Calendar Year (Jan-Dec) or Financial Year (July-June), depending on availability of data. The Bureau would like to appreciate the continued cooperation of MDAs in availing the requisite data to produce this publication. In a special way, I wish to thank the 2013 Statistical Abstract committee that compiled this publication. The Bureau welcomes constructive comments from stakeholders that aim at enhancing the quality of its future publications. Copies of this publication are available at the Bureau’s head office, Statistics House, Plot 9, Colville Street, Kampala. They can also be obtained from the official UBOS website: www.ubos.org. It is my sincere hope that the statistical information in this publication will be used by the readers to make informed decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Auditor General the Republic of Uganda
    OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NAKASEKE DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2018 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL UGANDA Table of Contents Opinion ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Basis for Opinion....................................................................................................................... 4 Key Audit Matters .................................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Performance of Youth Livelihood Programme ......................................................... 5 1.1 Noncompliance with the Repayment schedule ........................................................ 5 1.2 Inspection of Performance of Youth projects .......................................................... 6 1.3 Lack of Project Records ............................................................................................... 6 2.0 Implementation of the Uganda Road Funds ............................................................ 7 2.1 Budget Performance..................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Status of implementation ............................................................................................ 8 2.3 Routine manual maintenance ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Population and Housing Census 2014
    SELECTED SOCIO ECONOMIC INDICATORS Total Census Population Administrative units (August 2014) 1969 9,535,051 1980 12,636,179 Districts 112 1991 16,671,705 Counties 181 2002 24,227,297 Sub counties 1,382 2014 34,856,813 Municipalities 22 Town councils 174 2014 Census Population Demographic indicators (2011) Males 16,935,456 Female 17,921,357 Crude Birth Rate 42.1 Rural 28,430,800 Total Fertility Rate 6.2 Urban 6,426,013 Sex Ratio at birth 103 Kampala Capital City 1,516,210 Health Indicators (2011) Household population Infant Mortality Rate 54 Number of households 7,353,427 Maternal Mortality Rate 438 Average household size 4.7 Contraceptive Prevalence Rate 30 Population in households 34,350,070 HIV Prevalence rate 7.3 Annual Population growth rates (percent) 2013 Economic Indicators 1991-2002 3.20 GDP at current market prices 58,865 billion Shs Per capita GDP at current market 2002-2014 3.03 prices 1,638,939 Shs GDP at constant (2002) market 1969-2014 2.88 prices: Growth rate 4.7 percent Sex ratio (percent) Per capita GDP growth rate 1.1 percent Contribution of agric to GDP at 1991 96.5 current market prices 20.9 percent 2002 95.3 Reserves -234.7 million US$ 2014 94.5 Inflation rate 5.5 percent Budget deficit excl. grants as a % GDP (2013/14) -5.9 percent Population Density (persons per Sq km) 1991 85 Tourism – Number in 2013 2002 123 Resident departures 378,000 2014 174 Non- resident departures 1,188,000 Projected population (Millions) Resident arrivals 478,000 2015 35.8 Non-resident arrivals 1,206,000 2020 40.4 Visitors to National parks 214,000 2025 46.7 NATIONAL POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS 2014 PROVISIONAL RESULTS NOVEMBER 2014 REVISED EDITION UGANDA BUREAU OF STATISTICS Plot 9, Colville Street, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Survey of Large to Medium Mammals In
    GROUND SURVEY OF LARGE TO MEDIUM MAMMALS IN NAKASEKE DISTRICT CONCESSION AREA UGANDA Report prepared by F. Wanyama, F. E, Kisame, A. Rwetsiba, I. Bwire, H. Agaba and N. Enyagu UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY November 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i List of Acronyms ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- iii Acknowledgements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ iv Summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- v CHAPTER 1: Survey of Wild Animals in Nakaseke District----------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Objective of the survey -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 CHAPTER 2: Census Method --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Survey design-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Method used to count animals ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 CHAPTER 3: Data Analysis and Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Nakaseke District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi Le
    Nakaseke District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability profi le 2016 Acknowledgment On behalf of offi ce of the Prime Minister, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to all of the key stakeholders who provided their valuable inputs and support to this Multi-Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability mapping exercise that led to the production of comprehensive District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability (HRV) profi les. I extend my sincere thanks to the Department of Relief Disaster Preparedness and Management, under the leadership of the Commissioner, Mr. Martin Owor, for the oversight and management of the entire exercise. The HRV assessment team was led by Ms. Ahimbisibwe Catherine, Senior Disaster Preparedness Offi cer supported by Kirungi Raymond - Disaster Preparedness Offi cer and the team of consultants (GIS/DRR specialists); Dr. Bernard Barasa, and Mr. Nsiimire Peter, who provided technical support. Our gratitude goes to UNDP for providing funds to support the Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Mapping. The team comprised of Mr. Steven Goldfi nch – Disaster Risk Management Advisor, Mr. Gilbert Anguyo - Disaster Risk Reduction Analyst, and Mr. Ongom Alfred-Early Warning system Programmer. My appreciation also goes to Nakaseke District Team; 1. Mr. Ssbbaale Edrisa - District Production and Marketing Offi cer 2. Sekagya Moses - Natural Resources Offi cer The entire body of stakeholders who in one way or another yielded valuable ideas and time to support the completion of this exercise. Hon. Hilary O. Onek Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees Nakaseke District Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Profi le i Executive Summary The multi-hazard vulnerability profi le outputs from this assessment was a combination of spatial modeling using socio-ecological spatial layers (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Statistical Abstract Covers Statistics on the Environmental, Demographic, Socio-Economic, Production and Macroeconomic Sectors
    UGANDA BUREAU OF STATISTICS THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA 2015 STATISTICAL ABSTRACT Uganda Bureau of Statistics Statistics House Plot 9, Colville Street P.O Box 7186 Kampala Tel: 256-41-706000 October, 2015 Fax: 256-41-237553 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ubos.org UGANDA BUREAU OF STATISTICS 2015 STATISTICAL ABSTRACT ii FOREWORD The Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) is committed to the production and dissemination of integrated statistical information that meet the international standards quality requirements. This Statistical Abstract is UBOS’s prime annual publication through which key statistical information derived from the latest surveys, censuses and administrative records of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) are disseminated. The information presented in the 2015 Statistical Abstract covers statistics on the Environmental, Demographic, Socio-economic, Production and Macroeconomic sectors. Information on these sectors is presented on either a Calendar Year (January-December) or Financial Year (July-June) basis, depending on availability of data. The Bureau would like to appreciate the continued cooperation of MDAs in availing the requisite data to produce this publication. In a special way, I wish to thank the 2015 Statistical Abstract committee that compiled this publication. The Bureau welcomes constructive comments from stakeholders that aim at enhancing the quality of its future publications. Copies of this publication are available at the Bureau’s head office, Statistics House, Plot 9, Colville Street, Kampala. They can also be obtained from the official UBOS website: www.ubos.org. It is my sincere hope that the statistical information in this publication will be used by the readers to make informed decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Abstract 2018
    ---------------------------------------------------- < The Republic of Uganda MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT Ministry of Local Government, Plot 1, Pilkington Road, Worker’s House P.O. Box 7037, Kampala (U) Tel: +256-414-256533 Email:[email protected]; Website:http://molg.go.ug December 2018 Ministry of Local Government (MoLG) Statistical Abstract 2018 Statistical Abstract Ministry of Local Government December 2018 i Ministry of Local Government (MoLG) Statistical Abstract 2018 Districts of Uganda ii Ministry of Local Government (MoLG) Statistical Abstract 2018 Foreword Hon. Col. Tom Butime Minister of Local Government The Mandate of the Ministry of Local Government is to guide, harmonize, mentor and advocate for all Local Governments in support of Government’s vision of bringing about socio-economic transformation of the country. The Ministry is responsible for mentoring, compliance inspection and support supervision of Local Governments. In order to fulfil this mandate, quality statistics are required to measure development outcomes, identify development issues, inform policy formulation, and facilitate planning, decision making, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the impact of development programmes in the LGs. It is on this basis that the Ministry of Local Government, with support from Uganda Bureau of Statistics, adopted a strategic approach towards managing data and statistics of the Ministry. This necessitated development and implementation of a five year Strategic Plan for Statistics (SPS) covering the period 2015/16 – 2019/20 to act as a building block for the Plan for National Statistical Development (PNSD) framework. The plan is aimed at enhancing data quality and use and comprehensiveness of statistics produced by the ministry. In line with the MoLG-SPS, the Ministry is required to produce an Annual Statistical abstract.The MoLG Statistical Abstract 2018 consolidates data relating to its various output indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:569 Nakaseke District Quarter4
    Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2018/19 Vote:569 Nakaseke District Quarter4 Terms and Conditions I hereby submit Quarter 4 performance progress report. This is in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the letter appointing me as an Accounting Officer for Vote:569 Nakaseke District for FY 2018/19. I confirm that the information provided in this report represents the actual performance achieved by the Local Government for the period under review. Name and Signature: Accounting Officer, Nakaseke District Date: 25/08/2019 cc. The LCV Chairperson (District) / The Mayor (Municipality) 1 Local Government Quarterly Performance Report FY 2018/19 Vote:569 Nakaseke District Quarter4 Summary: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Overall Revenue Performance Ushs Thousands Approved Budget Cumulative Receipts % of Budget Received Locally Raised Revenues 1,391,641 1,067,843 77% Discretionary Government Transfers 3,713,608 3,713,608 100% Conditional Government Transfers 20,086,882 20,086,631 100% Other Government Transfers 2,539,829 1,970,555 78% Donor Funding 1,911,653 1,609,194 84% Total Revenues shares 29,643,613 28,447,831 96% Overall Expenditure Performance by Workplan Ushs Thousands Approved Cumulative Cumulative % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget Releases Expenditure Released Spent Spent Planning 73,588 46,205 46,205 63% 63% 100% Internal Audit 123,604 97,577 97,577 79% 79% 100% Administration 2,209,862 2,386,350 2,386,350 108% 108% 100% Finance 788,317 633,793 621,773 80% 79% 98% Statutory Bodies 1,013,051 1,139,239 1,139,239 112% 112%
    [Show full text]