Town of Taber Bylaw No. 6-2005 Traffic Control Bylaw
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parks Canada
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. A Guide to Competency-Based Management in Police Services Built by policing for policing This initiative was funded by the Government of Canada’s Sector Council Program Ottawa, March, 2013 Police Sector Council Page 1 of 69 Letter from the Steering Committee Dear Colleagues, The benefits of managing human resources using a competency- based management (CBM) approach are now undisputed. -
General Engineering Requirements Manual
GENERAL ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS MANUAL 201786 (Last revised by MarkCH on 10-1712-167) General Engineering Requirements Manual Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Intent ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Integration with City Codes, Ordinances, and Regulations ............................................ 1-1 1.3 Project Classifications .................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Comprehensive Planning ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Geographic Information System (GIS) Technology ........................................................ 1-3 1.6 Land Surveying .............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.7 Technical Reports .......................................................................................................... 1-6 1.8 Registrant’s Seal and Signature .................................................................................... 1-7 1.9 General Improvement Plan Requirements .................................................................... 1-7 1.10 Deviation from City Engineering Standards ................................................................ 1-13 CHAPTER 2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE ......................................................... -
Use of Force in the Calgary Police Service
Use of Force in the Calgary Police Service An Independent Review conducted by The Honorable Neil Wittmann, QC for Chief Constable Roger Chaffin Calgary Police Service April 2018 Independent Review of Police Use of Force Page ii LETTER TO CHIEF CONSTABLE ROGER CHAFFIN The Honourable Neil Wittmann, QC Independent Reviewer April 30, 2018 Roger Chaffin Chief Constable Calgary Police Service 5111 47 Street NE Calgary, AB. T3J 3R2 Dear Chief Chaffin: Independent Review of Use of Force in the Calgary Police Service I am pleased to provide you with my report following the review of use of force in the Calgary Police Service. The report includes my recommendations, informed by broad consultation, in response to the Terms of Reference dated May 16, 2017. I would like to thank you for the opportunity to lead this Review. I hope that the Calgary Police Service will find the recommendations useful in its efforts to improve its practices in respect of use of force. Sincerely, Neil Wittmann, QC Independent Review of Police Use of Force Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... x ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ xi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... -
Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board
ALBERTA LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW BOARD 2016 ANNUAL REPORT May 1, 2017 Honourable Kathleen Ganley MLA Minister of Justice and Solicitor General Room 403, Legislature Building 10800 – 97 Avenue Edmonton AB T5K 2B6 Dear Minister: 2016 Annual Report of the Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board It is my honour to submit to you today the Board’s latest annual report. As required by the Police Act, the report covers calendar year 2016 and reports on the number and nature of the appeals and inquiries that the Board held. It also provides summaries of our decisions, as the Police Act also requires. Yours sincerely, David Loukidelis Enclosure (2016 Annual Report) cc: Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Solicitor General Assistant Deputy Minister, Public Security Division Chiefs of Police, Alberta Municipal Police Services and First Nations Police Services Alberta Municipal Police Commissions ALBERTA LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW BOARD 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Message from the Chair ............................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Board’s Role and Mandate ......................................................................................................... 1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................................. 1 • Who Can Appeal to the Board -
Policing the Pandemic Enforcement Report April 14 2020 - May 1 2020
Policing the Pandemic Enforcement Report April 14 2020 - May 1 2020 Alex Luscombe1 and Alexander McClelland2 www.policingthepandemic.ca National Level Trends Based on available data, we count a total of 4,575 people that have been ticketed/charged on separate occasions for alleged COVID-19 related violations across Canada, resulting in over $5.8 million in fines to date. Although a very small number, we cannot say these are unique individuals as some people have already been fined/charged multiple times since police responses to COVID-19 began. The vast majority of these enforcement actions have been in Quebec´ (3048), followed by Ontario (930), Nova Scotia (516), and Alberta (44). Based on available data, we continue to observe far less enforcement actions in other Canadian provinces (less than 15 per province) (Figure 1). At the city level, most of these enforcement actions have been concentrated in Montreal´ (1848), Toronto (594), and Halifax (216). In the previous Enforcement Report released April 13, we indicated a concern that other provinces outside of Quebec,´ Ontario, and Nova Scotia could soon scale-up enforcement. Although that concern has not been realized, we note that in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Manitoba, there has been a small increase in enforcement. In Saskatchewan, tickets for alleged COVID-related violations are also the highest we have seen yet, starting at $2000 (compared to the next highest, Quebec,´ at $1,546). In terms of alleged violations, the majority of enforcement actions to date have been for failure to physical distance/comply with minimal gathering rules (4398). More and more details about these incidents are beginning to come to light. -
May 18, 2016 Honourable Kathleen Ganley MLA Minister of Justice And
May 18, 2016 Honourable Kathleen Ganley MLA Minister of Justice and Solicitor General Room 403, Legislature Building 10800 – 97 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5K 2B6 Dear Minister: 2015 Annual Report of the Alberta Law Enforcement Review Board It is my honour to submit to you today the Board’s latest annual report. As required by the Police Act, the report covers calendar year 2015 and reports on the number and nature of the appeals and inquiries that the Board held. It also provides summaries of our decisions, as the Police Act also requires. Yours sincerely, David Loukidelis Enclosure (2015 Annual Report) cc: Deputy Minister, Justice and Solicitor General Assistant Deputy Minister, Public Security Division Chiefs of Police, Alberta Municipal Police Services and First Nations Police Services Alberta Municipal Police Commissions ALBERTA LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW BOARD 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Message from the Chair ............................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Board’s Role and Mandate ......................................................................................................... 1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................................. 1 • Who Can Appeal to the Board ................................................................................. -
280 Insulting Characters? an Analysis of the Content of Tweets Addressed to the Police in Canada and the United States
Université de Montréal 280 Insulting Characters? An Analysis of the Content of Tweets Addressed to the Police in Canada and the United States par KNOP Justine École de criminologie Faculté des Arts et des Sciences Travail dirigé présenté en vue de l’obtention du grade de Maitrise en Criminologie option Criminalistique et Information Juillet, 2018 © KNOP Justine, 2018 Résumé Les réseaux sociaux tel Twitter sont de plus en plus populaires. Il n’est donc pas surprenant que la police s’engage sur ce terrain. Les réseaux sociaux permettent à la police de communiquer facilement avec la population dans un espoir d’amélioration de leur relation avec les citoyens qui peut parfois être tendue. Avec la démocratisation d’internet et l’avènement des réseaux sociaux, les incivilités qui auparavant étaient limitées au monde réel se sont transposées en ligne. La police est donc parfois la cible de ces cyber-incivilités. Bien que l’utilisation des réseaux sociaux par la police ait été étudié ces dernières années, la manière dont la population communique avec la police, surtout lorsqu’elle le fait de manière antagoniste, n’a été l’objet que de quelques recherches seulement. La présente étude cherche à combler ce manque dans la littérature en analysant ce qui est dit à la police sur le réseau social Twitter. Les tweets de janvier 2018 mentionnant les départements de police sélectionnés au Canada et aux Etats-Unis ont été collectés. Les résultats démontrent que certains départements de police sont plus mentionnés que d’autres (c’est que le cas du TPS et de la NYPD) mais aussi plus insultés que d’autres. -
X X X X X X Page 1 of 2
A - 4900 50 ST TABER, AB CANADA T1G 1T1 TELEPHONE: (403) 223-5500 FAX . (403) 223-5530 T OWN O F TABER Agenda Forwarded: January 11, 2013 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE TABER MUNICIPAL POLICE COMMISSION TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2013 AT 4:30 PM. MOTION ITEM NO. 1. CALL TO ORDER Greg Birch, Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to Call for Nominations from the Floor for Chair. Greg Birch. Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) to Call for Nominations from the Floor for Vice Chair. The new Chair will now Chair the Meeting. ITEM NO. 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA ITEMS X ITEM NO. 3. DELEGATIONS - NONE ITEM NO. 4. ADOPTION OF MINUTES A) RFD Regular Meeting - November 28, 2012 X ITEM NO. 5. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES - NONE ITEM NO. 6. INFORMATION ITEMS A) RFD Police Performance Metrics X B) RFD Sustainability of Public Police: Research Project Support X ITEM NO. 7. ACTION ITEMS A) RFD Canadian Association of Police Boards: Call for Resolutions X B) RFD Canadian Association of Police Boards: Membership Renewal X C) RFD Policing Oversight Standards: Standards Implementation Resource Material X D) RFD Taber Municipal Police Commission: Setting Regular Meeting Dates for 2013 X Page 1 of 2 email: [email protected] www.taber.ca ITEM NO. 8. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS A) RFD Police Chief's Report X B) RFD Financial Information to November 30, 2012 X ITEM NO. 9. OTHER BUSINESS - NONE ITEM NO. 10. MEDIA INQUIRIES ITEM NO. 11. CLOSED SESSION X Legal Labour ITEM NO. -
Archived Content Contenu Archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. ANNOUNCING NEW EDITION OF ADMISSIBILITY OF STATEMENTS - 2013 Police Edition by The Honourable René J. Marin, CM, OMM, OOnt. Q.C., J.D., CD LLD Inside you'll learn about: • Persons in authority • Detention and arrest • Inducements • Video/audio recording of statements • After-the-fact evidence • The right to counsel • Disclosure • Reasonable expectation of privacy • Jailhouse confessions • The polygraph • Prior inconsistent statements • Confirming confessions NEW IN THIE EDITION The new, 2013 Police Edition thoroughly reviews and updates all the significant devel- opments in this area of law since the last edition, including: • Police deception • Mr. -
HLPE Report # 12
HLPE REPORT 12 Nutrition and food systems A report by The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition September 2017 HLPE High Level Panel of Experts HLPE Reports series #1 Price volatility and food security (2011) #2 Land tenure and international investments in agriculture (2011) #3 Food security and climate change (2012) #4 Social protection for food security (2012) #5 Biofuels and food security (2013) #6 Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security (2013) #7 Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition (2014) #8 Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems (2014) #9 Water for food security and nutrition (2015) #10 Sustainable agricultural development for food security and nutrition: what roles for livestock? (2016) #11 Sustainable forestry for food security and nutrition (2017) #12 Nutrition and food systems (2017) All HLPE reports are available at www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe 2 HLPE Steering Committee members (September 2017) Patrick Caron (Chair) Carol Kalafatic (Vice-Chair) Amadou Allahoury Louise Fresco Eileen Kennedy Muhammad Azeem Khan Bernardo Kliksberg Fangquan Mei Sophia Murphy Mohammad Saeid Noori Naeini Michel Pimbert Juan Ángel Rivera Dommarco Magdalena Sepúlveda Martin Yemefack Rami Zurayk HLPE Project Team members Jessica Fanzo (Team Leader) Mandana Arabi Barbara Burlingame Lawrence Haddad Simon Kimenju Gregory Miller Fengying Nie Elisabetta Recine Lluís Serra-Majem Dipa Sinha Coordinator of the HLPE Nathanaël Pingault This report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE) has been approved by the HLPE Steering Committee. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Committee on World Food Security, of its members, participants, or of the Secretariat. -
Crime Prevention and Policing Study Strategic Update and Policing Services Model Review
Crime Prevention and Policing Study Strategic Update and Policing Services Model Review Part 1, 2, and 3 Appendix SUBMITTED TO THE Mayor and Council JUNE 30th 2011 perivale + taylor Red Deer Crime Prevention and Policing Review and Policing Service Model Review Part 1, 2, and 3 Appendices Table of Contents Appendix 1-1 RFP Deliverables............................................................................................................ 3 Appendix 1-2 Interview and Contact Listing ..................................................................................... 11 Appendix 1-3 Cities Included in the NORM Analysis ...................................................................... 16 Appendix 1-3A NORM Analysis ........................................................................................................ 17 Appendix 1-4 UK National Perspective ............................................................................................. 22 Appendix 1-5 Red Deer Crime Rate Trends 2004 to 2009 ............................................................ 30 Appendix 1-6 Interpretation of Clearance Status ............................................................................. 43 Appendix 1-7 Calls for Service............................................................................................................ 46 Appendix 1-7A Calls for Service, by Offence Type, by Zone ....................................................... 51 Appendix 1-8 Synopsis of Crime Prevention Literature Review ................................................... -
Highway-Rail Crossing HANDBOOK Third Edition FOREWORD
Highway-Rail Crossing HANDBOOK Third Edition FOREWORD The Highway-Rail Crossing Handbook, 3rd Edition (Handbook) has been prepared to disseminate current practices and requirements for developing engineering treatments for highway-rail grade crossings (referred to herein as “crossings”). The Handbook is intended to provide practitioners of all levels of knowledge and experience with critical background information and “noteworthy practices” consistent with the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (MUTCD) and more recent guidance developed by recognized subject matter experts. This edition constitutes a substantial update to and revision of the 2007 Handbook and efforts have been made to reorganize the contents. This edition includes “hotlinks” to facilitate navigation and access external information available on the web. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation and the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect official policy of the U.S. Department ofransportation. T This document contains images that are shown for illustration purposes only. For specific requirements, please refer to the 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) provide high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding.