Subversion 1605

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Subversion 1605 SUBVERSION 1605 A WEEK AFTER THE ILL-FATED GUNPOWDER PLOT THE MAIN CULPRITS ARE EITHER DEAD OR IN CUSTODY HERE THREE MINOR SUSPECTS ARE BEING QUESTIONED ABOUT THEIR INVOLVEMENT THREE DIFFERENT CHARACTERS THREE DIFFERENT INTERVIEWS THREE DIFFERENT OUTCOMES CHARACTERS SIR ROBERT CECIL – SECRETARY OF STATE & SPYMASTER THOMAS BATES – CATESBY’S SERVANT & LOYAL FRIEND FRANCIS TRESHAM – MISTRUSTED BUT WEALTHY CONSPIRATOR LADY ELIZA VAUX – HARBOURS FUGITIVE PRIESTS PRODUCTION NOTE THE SETTING IS A DARK AND DINGY INTERROGATION ROOM WITH A TABLE AND A CHAIR AT EITHER SIDE. THERE IS A FILE FOR EACH OF THE THREE SUSPECTS ON THE TABLE AND A CARAFE OF WINE AND SOME WINE GOBLETS. ALL THE CHARACTERS ARE IN MODERN DRESS. SUBVERSION 1605 Page 1 AT RISE CECIL IS SITTING AT ONE SIDE OF THE TABLE AND BATES AT THE OTHER. HE IS DISHEVELLED AND SCARED. CECIL, IN SHIRT SLEEVES AND LOOSE TIE, FLICKS THROUGH BATES’ FILE. CECIL You’re a very lucky man, Thomas Bates; you’re to be spared the rack – provided, that is, you tell me what I want to know. (HE POURS TWO GOBLETS OF WINE) BATES I’ll tell you what I can. CECIL We’ll come to that. But in the meantime, let’s drink a toast. (HE PUTS A GOBLET IN FRONT OF BATES) BATES What’s to celebrate? CECIL My success at Holbeach House. Four conspirators shot dead, three wounded, one on the run and the rest taken prisoner - some in very bad way I might add as a result of the accident with the gunpowder. A cause for celebration. So drink. BATES I’d rather not. CECIL I said, drink! (HE YANKS BATES’ HEAD BACK AND ATTEMPTS TO POUR THE WINE DOWN HIS THROAT) BATES RESISTS AND COUGHS AND SPLUTTERS AS WINE SPILLS OUT OF HIS MOUTH. CECIL WALKS AWAY WITH HIS GOBLET WHILE BATES RECOVERS. WHEN CECIL HAS FINISHED HIS DRINK HE TAKES CATESBY’S CRUCIFIX OUT OF HIS BREAST POCKET AND DANGLES IT IN FRONT OF BATES. Recognise this? BATES It’s my boss’s. (HE REACHES OUT HIS TREMBLING HAND TO GET HOLD OF THE CRUCIFIX) CECIL QUICKLY CLASPS HIS ROUND IT AND WITHDRAWS IT. BATES SOBS. CECIL It was fortunately retrieved before the rabble militia began looting and defiling the bodies. SUBVERSION 1605 Page 2 BATES Who else didn’t make it? CECIL Thomas Percy and the two Wrights. Put up quite a fight by all accounts. BATES And who’s on the run? CECIL Robert Wintour. He’s a nobody. Right, let’s concentrate on you now, shall we, and your part in the conspiracy. Fawkes told me you were responsible for transporting the gunpowder to Catesby’s lodgings in Lambeth. Is that correct? BATES I drove the wagon. CECIL You also acted as his messenger boy, delivering instructions to your comrades. BATES I did. Yes. CECIL In fact, you were Catesby’s right-hand man. Loyal and trustworthy. Obedient - like a dog! (HE SLINGS THE CRUCIFIX ACROSS THE ROOM) Fetch! BATES OBEYS AND RETRIEVES IT. HE HANDS IT TO CECIL WHO PUTS IT BACK IN HIS BREAST POCKET. BATES I’d do anything for him. CECIL And so dependable, you were at all the crucial planning meetings. BATES Most. But not all. CECIL You must be lost without him - now he’s dead. BATES I loved him like a brother. CECIL How touching! Yet, yet in his hour of greatest need you abandoned him. Why? BATES I was terrified. We’d been found out. The gunpowder blast had caused some terrible injuries. And we were heavily outnumbered. We were in a hopeless position. CECIL But instead of standing with your ‘brother’ to fight you ran off like a scared rabbit. You’re a coward Bates! And there’s only one thing I hate more than a coward - a Papist. (MORE) SUBVERSION 1605 Page 3 CECIL CONT’D Kowtowing to Rome. Makes me sick. On your knees Bates. BATES DITHERS. I said, on your knees! (HE DRAGS BATES OFF THE CHAIR AND ON TO HIS KNEES) Denounce the Pope as a heretic and acknowledge His Majesty the King as supreme head of the Church of England. BATES (IN A STATE OF DISTRESS) Please don’t make me do this. CECIL Do it! (HE SUDDENLY GRABS BATES BY THE THROAT) BATES GASPS FOR AIR. Do you denounce the Pope as a heretic and acknowledge King James as head of the Church of England? BATES Yes! Yes, yes, yes. CECIL Good! (HE RELEASES HIS GRIP) And if you maintain this spirit of co-operation we’ll be lenient. A pardon even. BATES FIGHTS FOR BREATH. You associate with the Jesuits, don’t you? BATES They’re my friends. (HE HAS A COUGHING FIT) CECIL How many of your so-called friends were recruited into your nest of vipers? BATES IS STILL STRUGGLING AND FINDS IT DIFFICULT TO SPEAK. (LOUDLY) How many? BATES (HOLDING UP THREE FINGERS) Three. CECIL And their names? BATES (BARELY AUDIBLE) Fathers Tesimond, Garnet and Gerard. CECIL Did you say, Tesimond, Garnet and Gerard? BATES NODS REPEATEDLY. SUBVERSION 1605 Page 4 CECIL And did they often meet up with Catesby to discuss the strategy? BATES (WITH DIFFICULTY) Several...times. The last...was...October...Harrowden. CECIL By the way, isn’t there a fourth priest: one who uses the alias Meaze? BATES That’s Father Garnet, the Father Superior. CECIL Number one Papist. The devil incarnate! BATES Our spiritual leader. CECIL He’s a subversive, Bates. Hell-bent on bringing the country under the thumb of Rome. I want to know where these priests are holed up. BATES Hard to say. CECIL Let’s make it easy then. (HE PLACES A SMALL MAP OF THE RECUSANT STRONGHOLD IN THE MIDLANDS IN FRONT OF BATES) Show me. Point to any property where they might be. BATES DALLIES. (ANGRILY) Hurry up Bates. I haven’t got all day. BATES (HE POINTS ONE BY ONE) White Webbs. Harrowden Hall. Baddesley Clinton. Hindlip House. CECIL Excellent! (HE PUTS THE MAP AWAY) I’ve had my suspicions but you’ve just confirmed we’re on the right track and I’ve not sent my men on a wild goose chase. With any luck they’ll flush out a priest or two - ideally the devil himself - and at worst unearth some popish paraphernalia. But it’s all damning evidence. BATES You will put in a good word for me with the King? CECIL No point, Bates. Your fate is already sealed. BATES But you promised a pardon. CECIL Slip of the tongue. I was lying. BATES (DESPERATELY) I have money. I can buy a pardon. SUBVERSION 1605 Page 5 CECIL (LAUGHING) Purely out of interest, Bates, how much do you reckon your miserable life is worth? BATES Twenty pounds. And all of it yours if you spare me. CECIL A charge of high treason waived for a paltry twenty pounds. A fair deal would you say? BATES It’s all I have. CECIL And how did you get it? By fiddling Catesby’s books or some illicit deals? BATES Kit Wright gave it me at Holbeach. CECIL A parting gift, was it? How very thoughtful. And what about the rest of the money he gave you? Where’s that? BATES What other money? CECIL The missing eighty pounds meant for his wife and child? BATES I don’t know anything about that. CECIL Are you sure? BATES I’m telling the truth, I swear. CECIL The truth is, Bates, you didn’t give a toss about Wright’s family that’s why you stole the lot and made a run for it. (CECIL TAKES A BAG OF MONEY OUT OF THE TABLE DRAWER AND PLONKS IT IN FRONT OF BATES) You were seen hiding it. And the note to your wife as to where to find it was, shall we say, intercepted. BATES Don’t hurt her, please. CECIL You, Bates, are the scum of the earth and will be found guilty of conspiracy to murder; bribing a Government Official and now theft. Pity you’ll only hang once. Now get out! And back to that shithole of a prison. (HE PUTS THE BAG BACK IN THE DRAWER AND SLAMS IT SHUT) BATES IS A BROKEN MAN. HE LEAVES. CECIL TURNS TO TRESHAM’S FILE AND LOOKS THROUGH IT. SUBVERSION 1605 Page 6 CECIL (SHOUTING) Tresham! In here, now! TRESHAM ENTERS SMARTLY DRESSED. CECIL CLICKS HIS FINGERS AND POINTS TO THE EMPTY CHAIR. TRESHAM (HE SITS) Can I ask why I’ve been arrested? CECIL Three reasons. One: you’re Catesby’s cousin. Two: you’ve got money. Three: I want information. Satisfied? TRESHAM What information? CECIL Don’t play the innocent. Tell me what you know about recent events. TRESHAM Oh, you mean the caper beneath the Lords’ Chamber? CECIL I don’t share your sense of humour, Tresham. TRESHAM I don’t wish to sound glib either, but as it turned out is wasn’t serious. No one was hurt. CECIL There was an attempted regicide. Is that not serious enough? TRESHAM Of course it’s serious! But the plot was uncovered and the culprits are either dead or in custody. What’s the problem? CECIL You sound mightily relieved. TRESHAM I’m just glad the King is safe and well. CECIL Are you really! Now, there’s a surprise. TRESHAM I wish him no harm. CECIL You wanted him dead. TRESHAM (INDIGNANTLY) Who told you that? CECIL The same person who named you as a conspirator. TRESHAM Huh! Someone with a grudge who wants to settle an old score? Or was it a jealous rival out to make trouble for me? CECIL You make your own trouble by the looks of this.
Recommended publications
  • The Gunpowder Plot Activity Pack
    TTHHEE GGUUNNPPOOWWDDEERR PPLLOOTT The Gunpowder Plot Activity Pack Welcome to Heritage Doncaster’s the Gunpowder Plot activity pack. This booklet is filled with ideas that you can have a go at as a family at home whilst learning about the Gunpowder Plot. Some of these activities will require adult supervision as they require using an oven, a sharp implement, or could just be a bit tricky these have been marked with this warning triangle. We would love to see what you create so why not share your photos with us on social media or email You can find us at @doncastermuseum @DoncasterMuseum [email protected] Have Fun! Heritage Doncaster Education Service Contents What was the Gunpower Plot? Page 3 The Plotters Page 4 Plotters Top Trumps Page 5-6 Remember, remember Page 7 Acrostic poem Page 8 Tunnels Page 9 Build a tunnel Page 10 Mysterious letter Page 11 Letter writing Page 12 Escape and capture Page 13 Wanted! Page 14 Create a boardgame Page 15 Guy Fawkes Night Page 16 Firework art Page 17-18 Rocket experiment Page 19 Penny for a Guy Page 20 Sew your own Guy Page 21 Traditional Bonfire Night food Page 22 Chocolate covered apples Page 23 Wordsearch Page 24 What was the Gunpowder Plot? The Gunpowder Plot was a plan made by thirteen men to blow up the Houses of Parliament when King James I was inside. The Houses of Parliament is an important building in London where the government meet. It is made up of the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous & Important Trials
    Unique & Distinctive Collections of Publications and Documents on Paper It’s easier to find at CosmoBooks.co.uk “More of the same, similar, and the unexpected” FAMOUS & IMPORTANT TRIALS. FAMOUS & IMPORTANT TRIALS. A selection of reports, separated from A Complete Collection of State Trials, not offprints or reprints. Large folio (250 x 450mm, 10 x 16 inches). Printed T. Wright, Essex Street, Strand; and Sold by G. Kearsley, No 46, near Serjeant's Inn, Fleet Street, London. 1778, Fourth Edition. All disbound. The 4th edition of the State Trials is considerably extended from the earlier editions, with extra material not previously published, in effect making this the superior, more desirable edition. It also benefits from being especially tall, at 16 inches, and mostly printed on nice paper. 1729 JAILS COMMITTEE. A Report from the Committee of the House of Commons appointed to enquire into the State of the Gaols of this kingdom, so far as relates to the cruel Usage of the Prisoners; which occasioned the following Trials. Proceedings against John Huggin, Warden of the Fleet [for the Murder of Edward Arne], Thomas Bambridge, Warden of the Fleet [for the Murder of Robert Castell, & for Felony], Richard Corbet, one of the Tipstaffs of the Fleet [an Appeal for the Murder of Robert Castell], and William Acton, Deputy-Keeper & Head Turnkey of the Marshalsea Prison [for the Murder of Thomas Bliss, the Murder of John Bromfield, the Murder of Robert Newton, & the Murder of James Thompson] & Minutes... touching a Charge against Sir Robert Eyre... for personally visiting Thomas Bambridge... whilst he was a Prisoner in Newgate, under a Commitment of the House of Commons, etc, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy and Conscience. a Psychological Study of the Gunpowder Plot
    CONSPIRACY AND CONSCIENCE CONSPIRACY AND CONSCIENCE. A PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE GUNPOWDER PLOT. BY JOHN KNIPE. A CONTEMPORARY JUDGMENT. N a seventeenth-century account of the Gunpowder Plot the I writer, a good man unknown, whose conscience was plainly perplexed by the cold-blooded proceedings of the conspirators, as well as shocked and horrified, makes a psychological reflection which while it is quaintly worded is almost modern in its shrewd analysis of motive, consent, and action. He says : " There are no conspiracies and insurrections more dangerous to States and Governments than those that the name of religion is made to patronize, for when that does head and manage the party as it makes it look somewhat considerable in itself, so it does inspire those that are concerned, with a certain furious and intemperate zeal and an ungovernable violence." Here he shows that a Religious Motive demanding rebellion in its own interest, dignifies actual Crime, and takes away the moral restraint of religion from the criminal, and still worse his devout instincts become so perverted that he sins deeper by his exceptional violence than the common thief, cut-throat or murdererwhooffends by custom and habit. This is Motive or Cause leading to Consent founded on Fallacy which the chronicler defines thus : " They then rebel with authority and kill with a safe conscience and think they cannot do amiss as long as it is to do God service." So Religion, as a moral influence, is lost on such minds. What check is left? Not natural affection, for "The brother will then deliver up the brother to death .
    [Show full text]
  • A Narrative of the Gunpowder Plot
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/narrativeofgunpoOOjard A NARRATIVE GUNPOWDER PLOT. NARRATIVE GUNPOWDER PLOT. BY DAVID JARDINE, Esq. OF TIIE MIDDLE TEUPLE, BAEEISTEH-AT-I/AW. *i hZs^l LONDON: JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1857. The right of Translation is reserved. T34- PREFACE. The substance of the following pages was published many years ago in the " Library of Entertaining Know- ledge," and formed the introduction to the trials of the several persons implicated in the Gunpowder Treason. The obvious objection to the course adopted with respect to the " Criminal Trials," was, that the introduction exceeded its office as an illustration of the judicial proceedings, and became a prominent part of the work, instead of being merely accessary to the main design. Another objection was, that a work, which professed some degree of research and a critical examination of the evidence and effect of disputed facts, was inconsistent with the object of the series to which it belonged, and with the character and capaci- ties of the readers for whose use that series was intended. Notwithstanding these objections, reprints vi PREFACE. of the Criminal Trials have been frequent during twenty-one years, and the consequence is that the stereotype plates, having become completely worn out, have been destroyed, and the work is out of print. Under these circumstances it is now proposed to arrange the materials in the form of a continuous narrative of the facts of the Gunpowder Plot, with such enlargements and corrections as subsequent inquiry and research have suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Post Reformation Catholicism in the Midlands of England Verner, Laura Anne Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. Sep. 2021 Abstract of a thesis entitled Post-Reformation Catholicism in the Midlands of England Submitted by Laura Anne Verner for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Hong Kong and King’s College London in August 2015 This dissertation examines the Catholic community of the Midlands counties during the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603).
    [Show full text]
  • The Gunpowder Plot: Fact Or Royal Plot? 1605 1
    1 Lochithea ©2009 The Gunpowder Plot: Fact or Royal Plot? 1605 1 ―Ages to come will be in doubt whether it were a fact or a fiction.‖ —Sir Edward Coke 2 ―A strange letter, from a strange hand, by a strange messenger; without date to it, name at it, and (I had almost said) sense in it. A letter which, even when it was opened, was still sealed, such the affected obscurity therein.‖ —Fuller 3 ―‘Tis well known, that many of the papists then and now have denied the fact, and imputed the whole of the affair to the artifice of Salisbury [Robert Cecil] and we are told, that others of opposite principles have confidently asserted, ‗that there never was any such thing‘ really as the Gunpowder Plot, but that it was a plot of King James‘ contriving, to endear himself unto the people.‖ —William Harris 4 Friar Roger Bacon, (1214–1292 or 1294) whose works were written at Oxford about the year 1270, has expressly named the ingredients of gunpowder as a well-known composition, to which was then used for diversion purposes: ‗An artificial fire that shall burn at any distance, can be composed of salt-petre [rock salt] and other ingredients; and afterwards a noise like that of thunder, and flashes as of lightning may be produced in the air, more terrible than those caused by nature itself; for a small quantity of the composition, not exceeding a cubical inch, in bulk, duly applied, makes a dreadful noise, with violent flushings: and this may be done several ways, whereby a city or an army may be destroyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonfire- Night
    ENGLISH ROSE LEARNING HALLOWEEN BONFIRE NIGHT Bonfire Night is a traditional British celebration, also known as Guy Fawkes’ Night. Every 5 November, bonfires are lit and firework dis- plays are held to remember an unsuccessful plot to blow up the Houses of Parliament and kill the king in 1605. These activities are designed to inform students about the history of this celebration, the people involved and traditions which are prac- tised today. In this lesson you’ll learn: What is the Bonfire Night People behind the gunpowder plot Bonfire Night celebrations Guy Fawkes Bonfire Night Recipes Remember, remember the fifth November… What is Bonfire Night? This was because of religion. England was a Protest- Guards broke into the cellars where the gunpowder ant country and the plotters were Catholic. They plotters were waiting. They were arrested and ex- On 5 November, people across the UK celebrate wanted England to be Catholic again, which they ecuted. Bonfire Night with fireworks, bonfires, sparklers and thought they could do if they killed King James I and toffee apples. his ministers. Some might have small fireworks parties in their back So, Fawkes and his group put 36 barrels of gun- gardens, while towns and villages may put on organ- powder in cellars underneath the Houses of Parlia- ised displays in public parks. ment in London, ready to set off a massive explosion. The reason we do it is because it's the anniversary of However, one an attempt to blow up the Houses of Parliament. m e m b e r o f Fawkes' group This was called the Gunpowder Plot.
    [Show full text]
  • GUY FAWKES and the GUNPOWDER PLOT the Catholic Religion
    1 Guy Fawkes was one member of a gang of plotters who had decided to kill the king (James I). They all followed GUY FAWKES AND THE GUNPOWDER PLOT the Catholic religion. Their anger came from the bitter split between Catholic and Protestant Christians. This split happened many years before the plot’s discovery on 5th November 1605. 2 For almost 100 years, Europe (including England and Scotland) had been torn apart by bitter religious arguments between different branches of the Christian church. 3 Some countries chose to follow new Protestant beliefs whilst others remained with the Catholic Church. 4 Both sides felt they were right and felt the other side were enemies of TRUE religion and must be defeated. 5 England had broken away from the Catholic Church in the 1530s when Henry VIII was king. However, many people in England stuck to their Catholic beliefs and were prepared to fight for what they believed in. 6 The Gunpowder Plotters had all suffered as Catholics under the long reign of Elizabeth I. She had tried to reach a The background of the Gunpowder Plot was linked to compromise between Protestants and Catholics but the Pope declared that English Catholics could ‘rise up’ religion. Here is a summary of the key points that led to against her. As a result of this, new laws were passed: Fines were increased for Catholics who refused to go to attend services at their local Protestant parish church; the plot being hatched. Catholics who shielded/protected priests or tried to convert others to their religion faced prison or death.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivocation and the Legal Conflict Over Religious Identity in Early Modern England
    Equivocation and the Legal Conflict Over Religious Identity In Early Modern England Janet E. Halley* "[Ilt was tyme to hide when Mr. Topclyfe came[.]"' - Robert Southwell, S.J. During the trial of the so-called Powder Men--Guy Fawkes and his co-conspirators in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament with the King, Queen, and heir apparent all in attendance-the King's Attorney General Sir Edward Coke presented into evidence a curious manuscript with two titles. The text's original name was A Treatise of Equivocation, but that had been scratched out and replaced with a new title, A Treatise Against Lying and FraudulentDissimulation. It had been discovered in the rooms which one of the conspirators had used in the Inner Temple, and mere possession of this book, Coke clearly thought, spoke loudly of all the defendants' guilt.2 By delaying the trial long enough to secure this * Thanks go to Ruth Wedgwood and H. Jefferson Powell for reading earlier versions of this essay; to the Kirkland Endowment and the staff of the Henry E. Huntington Library for making the first wave of research possible; to Christine Stapp for able bibliographical assistance; and to the current administration and the library staff at Hamilton College, who provided first-rate research support in a gesture of sheer generosity. 1. Pierre Janelle, Robert Southwell the Writer: A Study in Religious Inspiration (London: Sheed & Ward, 1935), 83 (quoting manuscript notes of an anonymous Catholic who attended Southwell's trial). According to Janelle and his source, Southwell made this remark to the court after his conviction on a charge of being a Catholic priest within England, made treasonous by 27 Eliz.
    [Show full text]
  • “MOST BARBAROUS and DAMNABLE TREASON”: The
    University of Wisconsin Eau Claire Department of History “MOST BARBAROUS AND DAMNABLE TREASON”: The Gunpowder Plot and how it is viewed in the Past and Present History 489 Research Seminar Professor: Dr. Mann Cooperating Professor: Dr. Sanislo Assisted by Dr. Thomas Miller By Jill York May 12th 2008 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire with the consent of the author. Table of Contents Abstract Introduction 1 Chapter 1 – Historiography: The past Revisited 2 Chapter 2 – England: Its History and Rulers 9 King Henry, King Edward and the nine days Queen Jane 10 Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth 12 Chapter 3 – The Plot unfolds 13 Chapter 4 – Language and Views of the Gunpowder Plot 16 Chapter 5 – Links to Terrorism – Modern View 27 Chapter 6 – Conclusion 29 Bibliography Primary Sources Secondary Sources 1 Abstract This paper will discuss the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 when a group of men plotted to blow up the English House of Parliament. The intended target of the event was King James VI of Scotland and I of England but also present at the time would have been the Queen, their children, members of Parliament, judges, officials and members of the clergy. The plot was discovered the night before it was to be implemented and the conspirators were either caught on site or found elsewhere within a few days. This paper will focus on how the event was viewed at the time by the citizens of England and what language they used to describe the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Coughton Court – and the Gunpowder Plot of 1605
    Trips Out with a religious connection: Coughton Court – and the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 The glorious house and topiary gardens at Coughton Court near Alcester in Warwickshire – the focus of religious dissent and rebellion in the late 16th and early 17th century. During the early years of the 17th century, religious dissent among the leading Catholic families in the country against Protestantism reached its crescendo in the Gunpowder Plot. Everyone knows the story of Guy Fawkes, who was apprehended in the Houses of Parliament on 5th November, just as he was about to blow the buildings and their occupants to kingdom come at the state opening of Parliament. What is less well known is the part the Midlands played in the Catholic conspiracy - and that the plot reached its denouement in Kingswinford at Holbeach House, nowadays a nursing home. In May 2017 we visited Coughton Court, the home of the Throckmorton family, who were deeply involved in the Plot. The front entrance to Coughton Court. The central Tudor gatehouse, dating from 1530, features hexagonal turrets, similar to the gatehouse of Hampton Court Palace, built just ten years later. The gatehouse was dedicated to Henry VIII by Sir George Throckmorton, who was one of the king’s greatest friends. An owl watches over the estate at Coughton from the top of the gatehouse tower. The Tabula Eliensis is an embroidery displayed in Coughton Court. It was done in the reign of Elizabeth I when Catholic families were undergoing persecution. It features the shields of prominent Catholic families who were imprisoned by the government, including Thomas Throckmorton’s shield.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Edward Wade
    Descendants of Edward Wade There is strong evidence that the immigrant ancestor to Virginia for this Wade family was a descendant of Armagil/Armigel Wade/Waad. Armagil was born 1514 in Kilnsey, near Coniston, Yorkshire, England, and died June 20, 1568. Armagil was educated at Magdalen College, Oxford, and received a degree January 23, 1531/2. A few years later in 1536, he was a voyager to Newfoundland aboard the ship "Minion" as recorded in Hore's "Voyages." He may have actually made several voyages according to different sources and is often referred to as "the English Columbus" by historians. He was also listed in Fuller's "Worthies of Yorkshire." In 1540, he received his first government position as Clerk of the Council at Calais. In 1547, he was elected to Parliament. In King Henry VIII's Privy Council, Armagil started as third clerk and in 1552 became Chief Clerk. Under Edward VI, he retained that position. When Queen Mary ascended to the thrown, he lost his offices but was restored to a prominent position under Queen Elizabeth. He was the prime liaison officer in 1562 with the French Huguenots when he mustered 600 men to fight at Le Havre. He had leased the estate of Belsize House, near London, from the Dean of St. Pauls. Belsize became the family seat and that is where he died. He was buried in Hampstead Church (now destroyed) with a monument, the memorial plaque of which was written in Latin. According to early 20th century genealogist Stuart Charles Wade, it translated as: "Sacred to the memory of Armigel Waad, the best and most kind of parents, a descendant of an ancient Yorkshire family, Secretary of the Privy Council of Henry VIII and Edward VI, and a justice of the Peace for the County of Middlesex, who--proficient in very many of the most important arts, excellently versed in civil jurisprudence, very familiar with many languages-- discharged divers most honorable embassies and was the first English explorer of the Indies of America.
    [Show full text]