Area-Based Assessment: East Luhansk Basic Service Unit Overview Ukraine, July 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Area-Based Assessment: East Luhansk Basic Service Unit Overview Ukraine, July 2017 Area-based Assessment: East Luhansk Basic Service Unit Overview Ukraine, July 2017 Introduction Key Findings Map 1: Locations of assessed settlements in the East Luhansk BSU Conflict between Ukrainian forces and armed This overview covers the East Luhansk BSU NOVOPSKOV ² UKRAINE Luhanska opposition groups broke out in eastern where 19 communities were assessed (Figure oblast Ukraine in 2014. Almost 10,000 people have 1). Donetska oblast been killed, 22,231 wounded, and about one RUSSIAN million displaced from their homes by fighting1. • Service access is best in the larger FEDERATION The humanitarian and recovery response communities of Stanytsia Luhanska, STAROBILSK to the crisis is hampered by information Vilkhove, Shchastia and Petropavlivka. These BILOVODSK gaps regarding access to basic services in communities have functioning health and communities located close to the contact line. education facilities, financial services and markets, and are connected to the water and RUSSIAN REACH conducted an assessment of all FEDERATION sewage networks. However, health, education NOVOAIDAR settlements within 5 km of the contact line with and waste disposal services in Stanytsia LYSYCHANSK two main objectives: 1. To understand how Luhanska have been badly affected by conflict. residents of communities in the area access PETROPAVLIVKA TEPLE ORIKHOVE- SEREDNOTEPLE DONETSKE KRIAKIVKA NYZHNOTEPLE basic services; 2. To identify gaps in service PEREDILSKE ARTEMA • Eight of the smaller communities have PISHCHANE TROKHIZBENKA provision and understand challenges from Settlements STARYI SHCHASTIA MALYNOVE particularly poor access to services because Assessed AIDAR MAKAROVE Non-Assessed Settlements Providing Services STANYTSIA the perspectives of both service providers LOBACHEVE LUHANSKA VILKHOVE they have no education facilities, no running Reference Settlements > 10,000 VALUISKE and users. The results will be used to inform BOLOTENE water and no primary healthcare facilities. BSU Boundary SYZE INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) 0 7142128Kms strategic planning by humanitarian and local LUHANSK government actors. • Some basic services are available in seven Figure 1: Communities assessed within the East communities, although residents still face Figure 2: Profiles of KIs interviewed This assessment collected data at the Luhansk BSU community level from 100 communities. access challenges caused by a lack of facilities, Interviews were conducted with 350 Key insufficient and expensive public transport and Settlement Pop. Settlement Pop. Profile Female Male Total Informants (KIs) representing community security risks due to shelling and landmines/ Stanytsia Luhanska 13,000 Staryi Aidar 320 members, members of the local administration, Explosive Remnants of War (ERW). Shchastia 9,250 Kriakivka 200 Community KI 54 8 62 and representatives of health and education Petropavlivka 5,200 Lobacheve 190 Administration KI 12 6 18 • Distance to facilities and the high cost of facilities. The assessment did not conduct Valuiske 3,990 Bolotene 75 Education facility KI 27 2 29 representative sampling, and therefore results transport are the key challenges in accessing Vilkhove 3,200 Orikhove-Donetske 56 Health facility KI 10 4 14 should be considered indicative only. Through facilities and services. Public transport is network analysis, the assessed communities insufficient across the BSU, so travelling to Trokhizbenka 2,000 Malynove 51 were clustered into seven Basic Service Units services is time-consuming and expensive. Makarove 1,842 Pishchane 38 (BSUs) to determine the main constraints in Nyzhnoteple 1,700 Serednoteple 20 service access and provision in each BSU. Peredilske 300 Syze 15 Artema 550 1. OHCHR, ‘Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine’, December 2016. Protection Map 2: Courts and police stations in the BSU Protection risks are high across the BSU due to Frequent shelling indicates a high need for Services NOVOPSKOV proximity to the contact line: 14 of the assessed psycho-social support (PSS) services, which Court Temporaily closed facilities communities are located under 3 km from the are insufficient in 16 communities. KIs in Police Service Links contact line. KIs in seven of the assessed Orikhove-Donetske, Vilkhove and Bolotene Court communities reported daily or weekly shelling reported further PSS services are not required. Assessed Non-Assessed Settlements Providing Services Reference Settlements > 10,000 in some areas of their communities. This Child Friendly Spaces are present in four STAROBILSK BSU Boundary was confirmed by International NGO Safety communities, but more are required in all INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) Organisation (INSO) data in four communities, communities as KIs in these four communities BILOVODSK while the remaining three communities are felt the number available was insufficient. within hearing range of daily or weekly shelling Vulnerable groups but have not been hit directly. Specific protection concerns for women were RUSSIAN Landmine / ERW risks FEDERATION reported only in Stanytsia Luhanska, where KIs Landmines/ERW are reported in 17 of the stated that domestic violence is an issue and NOVOAIDAR assessed communities, but not all hazardous that services available for survivors of domestic LYSYCHANSK areas have been marked. Mine Risk Education violence are not sufficient. TEPLE (MRE) is required in all but four of the assessed PETROPAVLIVKA IDPs are reportedly living in 14 of the communities SEREDNOTEPLE KRIAKIVKA NYZHNOTEPLE communities, particularly in Shchastia and ORIKHOVE- PEREDILSKE ARTEMA assessed. There are over 3,000 registered IDPs DONETSKE PISHCHANE TROKHIZBENKA Artema where MRE has reportedly only been MALYNOVE in Stanytsia Luhanska, according to the local STARYI SHCHASTIA delivered for schoolchildren. AIDAR MAKAROVE VILKHOVE administration, indicating a need for IDP-specific LOBACHEVE STANYTSIA LUHANSKA VALUISKE Protection challenges for communities services such as documentation support in this BOLOTENE SYZE area. Administrators reported high proportions 0612 18 24 Kms Mines/ERW are the most frequently cited LUHANSK of elderly people in all communities. Data from protection concern across all communities. community KIs suggest elderly residents may Community tension, typically between 2 struggle to cope with service access challenges Figure 3: Key protection concerns reported Figure 4: Checkpoints affecting communities internally displaced persons (IDPs) and 58+29+23+13 related to distance and travel time. residents, is the second most cited concern. 1. Mines / ERW 58% Communities where checkpoint 13 / 17 Destruction of property due to shelling is a Military checkpoints 2. Community tension 29% controls access particular concern in Stanytsia Luhanska; Checkpoints control access to 13 communities2. 3. Destruction of property 23% Communities where checkpoint 6 / 17 KIs in Lobacheve and Makarove reported restricts entry or exit Checkpoints restrict entry and exit to the residents were concerned by the proximity of 4. Shelling 13% community for residents of Shchastia, Communities where checkpoint 3 / 17 armed actors in these communities. Trokhizbenka, Vilkhove, Makarove and Syze. restricts delivery of goods KIs reported protection services are Entry and exit to Kriakivka is also affected by the Communities affected by a 1 / 17 unavailable or insufficient across the BSU. Trokhizbenka checkpoint, but the checkpoint checkpoint elsewhere does not control entry to the community. 2 2. Residents reported checkpoints do not affect Orikhove- Donetske, Valuiske, Peredilske, Malynove or Artema. Education Map 3: Schools and kindergartens in the BSU ! There are 29 functioning schools in the BSU: some damage due to shelling, and 13 remain Services NOVOPSKOV ! ! Kindergarten 13 kindergartens, 14 all-grade schools, one in need of repairs. Stanytsia Luhanska ! Secondary Base School primary and lower secondary school and one Specialised School (Grades 1-3) was ! All Grades School Service Links upper-secondary school. The main challenges completely destroyed by shelling and teaching Education in accessing education in the BSU are the now takes place in a kindergarten and a Assessed Non-Assessed Settlements Providing Services Reference Settlements > 10,000 distance to facilities, lack of transport and nearby office. Electricity shortages occur STAROBILSK BSU Boundary !! conflict-related security risks. KIs in Orikhove- regularly at seven schools, only two of which INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) Donetske, Malynove and Pishchane reported have generators. Heating shortages were BILOVODSK !! that all or almost all families with children have infrequent and only reported at three schools. left these communities. All schools except Peredilske Kindergarten are Education access challenges connected to the sewage network and have RUSSIAN flushing toilets. However, two schools have FEDERATION All levels of education are available in eight no running water and one experiences daily ! communities. Children from other communities NOVOAIDAR ! shortages. Pupil-to-toilet ratios meet SPHERE in the BSU travel to these communities to standards3 at kindergartens (10 pupils per LYSYCHANSK attend schools or to Novoaidar (25 km north of toilet on average), at the primary and lower ! TEPLE the contact line). PETROPAVLIVKA ! SEREDNOTEPLE ! ! secondary school (7 pupils per toilet) and at KRIAKIVKA !! ! NYZHNOTEPLE ORIKHOVE- PEREDILSKE ARTEMA ! PISHCHANE The chief access challenges in the BSU are the the upper secondary school (11 pupils per DONETSKE
Recommended publications
  • Transformations of the Cultural Landscape of Donbas During the Armed Conflict 2015–2017
    Studia z Geografii Politycznej i Historycznej tom 6 (2017), s. 305–326 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2300-0562.06.13 Roman Slyvka, Liubov Slyvka, Yaroslava Atamaniuk Transformations of the cultural landscape of Donbas during the armed conflict 2015–2017 The main objective of the article – to show the different trajectories of the cultural land- scape in controlled and uncontrolled parts of the war-torn Donbas. The cultural landscape of Ukraine significantly changed during the twentieth century. The main factors of these transformations were ideological, military and geopolitical. The sub-ordinate position of Ukraine within the USSR allowed communist leaders to enforce sovietisation of the cultural landscape. This policy was especially noticeable in the great industrial region of Donbas. Achievements of independence by Ukraine and democratization of country' public life have led to transformation/conservation of the cultural landscape, which corresponded with political culture of individual regions. The war in the Donbas has become a catalyst for the processes of creating different types of cultural landscape on the different sides of the contact line. The policy of creating a cultural landscape has become an instrument of political socialization and mobilization of the population. This process is not complete, and can contribute to the crystallization of new subregional identities on different parts of contemporary Donbas. Keywords: Donbas, cultural landscape, post-soviet city, military conflict, decomunisa- tion, renaming, monument, policy of memory. 1. Introduction The conflict in Donbas deepened those political divisions that began to be observed in Ukrainian society since the 1990s. There are a number of visible elements of Donbas' cultural landscape, which indicates the drastic changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211
    - 1 - 1 Daily Report 32/2021 10 February 20211 Summary The SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations in Donetsk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 42 ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission recorded 40 ceasefire violations in Luhansk region. In the previous reporting period, it recorded five ceasefire violations in the region. The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske, and again saw containers inside and near the southern edge of the area near Zolote. The Mission facilitated and monitored adherence to localized ceasefires to enable operation and maintenance of critical civilian infrastructure and a transfer of funds. The SMM continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry- exit checkpoints and two corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions. The SMM’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Bezimenne and on a road near non- government-controlled Korsun, Donetsk region.* Ceasefire violations2 Number of recorded ceasefire violations3 Number of recorded explosions4 1 Based on information from the Monitoring Teams as of 19:30, 9 February 2021. All times are in Eastern European Time. 2 For a complete breakdown of ceasefire violations, please see the annexed table. During the reporting period, the SMM camera in Petrivske was not operational, and weather conditions limited the observational capabilities of some of the other SMM cameras. 3 Including explosions. 4 Including from unidentified weapons. - 2 - Map of recorded ceasefire violations - 3 - In Donetsk region, the SMM recorded ten ceasefire violations, including nine explosions (five undetermined and four outgoing, all of undetermined weapons), which occurred in areas on the north-western edge of Horlivka (non-government-controlled, 39km north-east of Donetsk) and near the Donetsk Filtration Station (DFS) (15km north of Donetsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2015 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 II. RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, SECURITY AND PHYSICAL INTEGRITY 7 A. Casualties 7 B. Civilian casualties 8 C. Total casualties (civilian and military) from mid-April 2014 to 15 August 2015 12 D. Unlawful and arbitrary detention, summary executions, and torture and ill-treatment 13 III. FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 18 A. Freedom of movement 18 B. Freedom of expression 19 C. Freedom of peaceful assembly 20 D. Freedom of association 21 E. Freedom of religion or belief 22 IV. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS 22 A. Right to an adequate standard of living 23 B. Right to social security and protection 24 C. Right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health 26 V. ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 27 A. Accountability for human rights violations committed in the east of Ukraine 27 B. Accountability for human rights violations committed during the Maidan protests 30 C. Accountability for the 2 May violence in Odesa 30 D. Administration of justice 32 VI. LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENTS AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORMS 34 VII. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA 38 VIII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This is the eleventh report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on the situation of human rights in Ukraine, based on the work of the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) 1. It covers the period from 16 May to 15 August 2015 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH Only
    SEC.FR/876/20 29 December 2020 OSCE+ ENGLISH only THEMATIC REPORT CHECKPOINTS ALONG THE CONTACT LINE: CHALLENGES CIVILIANS FACE WHEN CROSSING 1 November 2019 - 15 November 2020 December 2020 1 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2020 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary 4 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: Legislative and regulatory developments 9 Measures taken at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECP) and at the corresponding checkpoints of the 9 armed formations amid the COVID-19 outbreak (16 March to 10 June 2020) Regulatory developments following the partial reopening of the EECPs and of the corresponding check- 10 points (10 June to 15 November 2020) Other developments 12 Chapter 2: Impact on civilians of the freedom of movement restrictions and of the crossing requirements 14 after the partial reopening of the EECPs and the corresponding checkpoints Impact of freedom of movement restrictions on access to rights and services 14 Partial reopening of the EECPs and corresponding checkpoints, and burden of crossing requirements 18 on civilians Chapter 3: Opening of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge and construction works near Zolote and Shchas- 22 tia Opening of the renovated section of the Stanytsia Luhanska bridge 22 Construction and works near Shchastia and Zolote 22 Conclusion 26 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crucial aspects of the lives of civilians in the conflict-affected areas of eastern Ukraine depend on their ability to cross the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC: Profiling of IDP Situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine
    ProfilingAnnual of IDP situation Report in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-drivenfrom approach the toBoard durable solutions 2019 Acknowledgements NRC would like to thank NRC staff and Mr. Petr Kostohryz, JIPS staff, members of the Techni- cal Working Group and the Advisory Group, Luhansk State Regional Administration, in partic- ular the Social Protection Department, Prof. Volodymyr Sarioglo, Analytical Center Sociocon- sulting, NGO Stabilisation Support Services, Luhansk Regional IDP Council. List of Abbreviations CSO Civil Society Organisation GCA Government-Controlled Area (includes any government-controlled area in Ukraine not limited to Luhansk or Donetsk regions) GDP Gross Domestic Product IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person JIPS Joint IDP Profiling Service NGCA Non-Government Controlled Area NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NRC Norwegian Refugee Council SME Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise SSS NGO Stabilisation Support Services UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia UN United Nations Profiling of IDP situation in Luhansk Region, Ukraine Data-driven approach to durable solutions 2 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................4 2. Introduction .......................................................................5 3. Methodology ......................................................................7 4. Limitations ........................................................................7 5. International Standards and National Frameworks on Durable Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
    Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secretariat Du Comite Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DU COMITE DES MINISTRES Contact: Clare OVEY Tel: 03 88 41 36 45 Date: 12/01/2018 DH-DD(2018)32 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1310th meeting (March 2018) (DH) Item reference: Action plan (09/01/2018) Communication from Ukraine concerning the case of NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine (Application No. 54825/00) * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1310e réunion (mars 2018) (DH) Référence du point : Plan d’action Communication de l’Ukraine concernant l’affaire NEVMERZHITSKY c. Ukraine (requête n° 54825/00) (anglais uniquement) DH-DD(2018)32 : Communication from Ukraine. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. DGI 09 JAN. 2018 Annex to the letter of the Agent of Ukraine SERVICE DE L’EXECUTION before the European Court of Human Rights DES ARRETS DE LA CEDH of 05 January 2018 no. 190/5.2.1/ін-18 Updated Action plan on measures to be taken for implementation of the European Court’s judgments in the cases of Nevmerzhitsky group v. Ukraine (application no. 54825/00, judgment of 05/04/2005, final on 12/10/2005); Yakovenko group (Application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015
    General Coordination Meeting – Sievierodonetsk (Luhansk Oblast) 18 June 2015 Discussion Action Points/Decisions 1. Summary of steps taken based on decisions of the previous meeting by UN OCHA OCHA to follow up on the implications of new Temporary Order of entry/exit to NGCAs for humanitarian cargo UN OCHA summarized activities based on the decisions of the last General Coordination Meeting. The movement. issue of unaccompanied minors is being addressed both at oblast and national levels. WHO keeps checking if tuberculin was delivered to all raions of the oblast. For the moment, it is confirmed that Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions and Lysychansk didn’t receive it. WHO and UN OCHA had the meetings with the authorities in Bilovodsk, Milove and Markivka raions. The maternity hospital in Bilovodsk serves three raions and many women come for delivery from NGCAs of the oblast. The authorities asked to support the hospital with hygiene kits both for women and for newborns. At the national level UN OCHA continues to provide support in the development of the Law on “humanitarian assistance”. It is expected that the draft is finalized by June 30 and then passed for discussion to the Parliament of Ukraine. As of today only 30% of required funding has been funded or pledged as part of Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The new Temporary Order on entry/exit to NGCAs has been adopted and came into force. For the moment no commercial cargoes are permitted to NGCAs due to security situation. 2. Update of the current humanitarian situation in Oblast from UN OCHA and LOMCA SES to share the estimated costs of transition center with the humanitarian partners for their participation in The number of officially registered IDPs is growing despite of difficulties in crossing the contact line.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Progress Report
    EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 Table of contents List of annexes 5 Abbreviations and acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 Background 12 COMPONENT 1 16 LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND DECENTRALISATION REFORM Result 1.1 Nationwide decentralisation reform is fully implemented in the newly established Amalgamated Territorial Communities (ATCs) in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblast under the 18 control of the Government Result 1.2 Access to quality administrative and social services is improved 26 Result 1.3 Government capacity for participatory strategic planning and transparent project 30 implementation is enhanced. COMPONENT 2 36 ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND MSMES DEVELOPMENT REFORM Result 2.1 Network of service providers is established, and market access improved 38 Result 2.2 Access to credit and financing is improved and more flexible in Complement to KFW 43 Result 2.3 Provision of technical and vocational training is of increasing quality.. 46 COMPONENT 3 52 COMMUNITY SECURITY AND SOCIAL COHESION Result 3.1. A network of citizen groups is established to promote social cohesion and sustainable 54 socio-economic development. Result 3.2 Citizen group initiatives are financially supported. 77 COMPONENT 4 79 SECTORAL REFORMS AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENTS (HEALTH) Result 4.1 The regional health care system is effectively functioning at the regional
    [Show full text]