DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-98-33-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 02 August 2001 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Almiro Rodrigues, Presiding Judge Fouad Riad Judge Patricia Wald Registrar: Mr. Hans Holthuis PROSECUTOR v. RADISLAV KRSTIC JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Mark Harmon Mr. Peter McCloskey Mr. Andrew Cayley Ms. Magda Karagiannakis Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Nenad Petrušic Mr. Tomislav Višnji} Case No.: IT-98-33-T 2 August 2001 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/440d3a/ CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. FINDINGS OF FACT..................................................................................................................3 A. THE TAKE-OVER OF SREBRENICA AND ITS AFTERMATH..............................................................3 1. 1991-92: The Break-Up of the Former Yugoslavia................................................................3 2. 1992-1993: Conflict in Srebrenica..........................................................................................4 3. April 1993: The Security Council Declares Srebrenica a “Safe Area”...................................6 4. Early 1995: The Situation in the Srebrenica “Safe Area” Deteriorates ..................................9 5. Spring 1995: The Bosnian Serbs Plan To Attack the Srebrenica “Safe Area”.....................10 6. 6-11 July 1995: The Take-Over of Srebrenica......................................................................11 7. The Bosnian Muslim Civilians of Srebrenica........................................................................12 (a) The Crowd at Poto~ari ....................................................................................................... 12 (i) The Humanitarian Crisis in Poto~ari: 11-13 July 1995 ................................................... 13 (ii) 12-13 July: Crimes Committed in Poto~ari.................................................................... 13 (iii) 12-13 July 1995: The Transport of the Bosnian Muslim Women Children and Elderly from Potocari................................................................................................................ 15 (iv) The Separation of the Bosnian Muslim Men in Poto~ari................................................ 16 (b) The Column of Bosnian Muslim Men ................................................................................ 18 8. The Execution of the Bosnian Muslim Men from Srebrenica ...............................................20 9. Forensic Evidence of the Executions.....................................................................................21 10. The Number of Men Executed by the Bosnian Serb Forces Following the Take-over of Srebrenica in July 1995.......................................................................................................25 11. A Plan to Execute the Bosnian Muslim Men of Srebrenica.................................................27 12. Widespread Knowledge of the Crimes.................................................................................28 13. The Impact of the Crimes on the Bosnian Muslim Community of Srebrenica....................29 14. Conclusions..........................................................................................................................31 B. THE ROLE OF THE DRINA CORPS IN THE SREBRENICA CRIMES...................................................32 1. Preliminary Matters................................................................................................................32 (a) Background to the Drina Corps .......................................................................................... 32 (b) Codes and Numbers Used by the Drina Corps in July 1995 ................................................ 33 (c) Reliability of Intercepted Communications ........................................................................ 34 2. Krivaja 95...............................................................................................................................39 (a) The Objective of Krivaja 95............................................................................................... 39 (b) The Shelling of Srebrenica: Terrorisation of the Civilian Population.................................. 40 3. Involvement of Drina Corps Personnel in the Events at Poto~ari: 11-13 July 1995.............42 (a) Transport of the Bosnian Muslim Civilians out of Poto~ari................................................. 42 (i) Meeting at Hotel Fontana on 11 July 1995 at 2000 Hours ............................................... 42 (ii) Meeting at the Hotel Fontana on 11 July 1995 at 2300 Hours......................................... 43 (iii) Meeting at the Hotel Fontana on 12 July 1995 at 1000 Hours ....................................... 44 (iv) Organisation of the Buses ............................................................................................. 45 (v) The Presence of Drina Corps Officers in Poto~ari on 12 and 13 July 1995 ..................... 47 (vi) A Forced or Voluntary Movement?............................................................................... 48 (b) The Crimes Committed in Poto~ari on 12-13 July 1995 ..................................................... 50 (c) The Separation of the Men in Poto~ari ............................................................................... 53 4. Involvement of the Drina Corps in Action against the Bosnian Muslim Column.................56 (a) Combat against the Column ............................................................................................... 57 (b) Capture of Bosnian Muslim Men from the Column............................................................ 59 (i) General Knowledge that Bosnian Muslim Men were Being Captured from the Column.. 59 (ii) 13 July 1995: Participation in the Capture of Prisoners along the Bratunac-Konjevi} Polje Road .................................................................................................................... 60 Case No.: IT-98-33-T 2 August 2001 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/440d3a/ (iii) 12-15 July 1995: Involvement with the Detention of Bosnian Muslim Prisoners in Bratunac ....................................................................................................................... 64 (iv) 13-16 July 1995: Zvornik Brigade Knowledge of Bosnian Muslim Prisoners detained in its Zone of Responsibility ......................................................................................... 67 (v) Capture of Prisoners during Drina Corps Sweep Operation in the Former Enclave ......... 68 5. Involvement of the Drina Corps in the Mass Executions.......................................................69 (a) The Morning of 13 July 1995: Jadar River Executions ...................................................... 69 (b) The Afternoon of 13 July 1995: Cerska Valley Executions................................................ 71 (c) Late Afternoon of 13 July 1995: Kravica Warehouse ........................................................ 72 (d) 13-14 July 1995: Tišca...................................................................................................... 76 (e) 14 July 1995: Grbavci School Detention Site and Orahovac Execution site ....................... 77 (f) 14 - 15 July 1995: Petkovci School Detention Site and Petkovci Dam Execution Site ......... 81 (g) 14 - 16 July 1995: Pilica School Detention Site and Branjevo Military Farm Execution Site ................................................................................................................................... 83 (h) 16 July 1995: Pilica Cultural Dom ..................................................................................... 87 (i) Kozluk................................................................................................................................ 89 (j) Smaller Scale Executions following the Mass Executions ................................................... 91 (k) The Reburials .................................................................................................................... 92 6. The Chain of Command in Operation for the Drina Corps: July 1995..................................93 (a) Parallel Chains of Command.............................................................................................. 93 (i) Did the VRS Main Staff exclude the Drina Corps Command from the Srebrenica Follow-up Operations? ................................................................................................. 94 (ii) Were the Security Organs Operating in Secret?.............................................................. 99 (iii) Conclusions................................................................................................................ 100 (b) Responsibility of the Drina Corps Command for the Actions of Non-Drina Corps Units Operating in the Drina Corps Area of Responsibility in July 1995................................... 101 (i) The 10th Sabotage Detachment...................................................................................... 101 (ii) The 65th Protection Regiment .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1.4. United Nations Peacekeeping in Bosnia and Herzegovina ...56
    UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL The United Nations Peacekeepers and Local Population of the United Nations Safe Area Srebrenica: (De) Construction of Human Relationships DISSERTATION Tea Rozman – Clark Mentor: Prof. Dr. Mirjam Milharčič - Hladnik Nova Gorica 2014 CONTENTS CONTENTS....................................................................................................................... 2 List of Photographs .................................................................................................... 4 List of Narrators ......................................................................................................... 7 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................... 9 Notes on Transliteration ........................................................................................... 12 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................... 14 Preamble .................................................................................................................. 20 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 24 Theoretical Framework: ................................................................................................ 28 Memory Studies ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecution's Submission Pursuant to Rule 65
    IT-95-5/18-PT 18182 D 18182 - D 15860 18 May 2009 PvK UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 18 May 2009 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Iain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Christoph Flügge Judge Michèle Picard Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Alan Tieger Ms. Hildegard Uertz-Retzlaff The Accused: Radovan Karad`i} 18181 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-95-5/18-PT THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARAD@I] PUBLIC WITH PARTLY CONFIDENTIAL APPENDICES PROSECUTION’S SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER (E)(i)-(iii) 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber’s order of 6 April 20091 and Rule 65 ter (E)(i)- (iii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence (“Rules), the Prosecution hereby files: (i) the final version of the Prosecutor's pre-trial brief (Appendix I); (ii) the confidential list of witnesses the Prosecutor intends to call (Appendix II); and (iii) the confidential list of exhibits the Prosecutor intends to offer into evidence (Appendix III). 2. Attached to Appendix I, the final pre-trial brief, are the following: - Confidential Attachment Detailing Events in the Municipalities: these set out the political background and events in the 27 municipalities;2 - Confidential Appendix A: Schedules A-G setting out additional particulars and the supporting evidence for the scheduled incidents; 1 Order Following on Status Conference and Appended Work Plan, 6 April 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Srebrenica - Intro ENG.Qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1
    srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 2 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Bridging the Gap conference in Srebrenica would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of many people and agencies. Our thanks to all those that made this remarkable series possible. Appreciation is expressed to the Helsinki Committee in Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their commitment to truth-seeking and upholding basic human values, often in the face of hostility, is acknowledged. The event was generously supported by the Neighbourhood Programme of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Heartfelt appreciation is extended to those people most affected by the crimes addressed at the conference. Without their bravery, nothing could be accomplished. ii Bridging the Gap between the ICTY and communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 A publication of the Communications Service, Registry, ICTY Contents Editor: Liam McDowall Graphics Editor: Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer Contributors: Ernesa Begi}-Ademagi}, Rebecca Cuthill, Matias Hellman, James Landale, Natalie O’Brien Printed by Albani drukkers, The Hague, Netherlands 2009 SREBRENICA srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 3 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Table of contents Map
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Normative Gaps in Transitional Justice: the Serbian Discourse on the Srebrenica Declaration 20101
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 11, No 4, 2012, 127-156 Copyright © ECMI 2013 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/fileadmin/downloads/publications/JEMIE/2012/Mehler.pdf Understanding Normative Gaps in Transitional Justice: The Serbian Discourse on the Srebrenica Declaration 20101 Daniela Mehler* Friedrich Schiller University The Serbian government has often been accused of “double-speak” in confronting crimes that took place during the Yugoslav war. This behaviour is interpreted as a gap between an underdeveloped domestic norm of facing the past and the international norm of transitional justice. This paper argues that “normative gaps” are no contradiction to the transnational norm socialization process, but to the rule itself. By applying methods of discourse analysis, the 2010 Serbian parliamentary debate on the declaration condemning the 1995 massacre of Srebrenica is used as an extensive case study showing how domestic actors use concepts of facing the past. Keywords: norm socialization, transitional justice, facing the past, Serbia, Srebrenica, conditionality 1. Introduction Until recently, Serbia was not regarded as having confronted its war-time past in an appropriate manner. However, under President Boris Tadić (2004-2012) Serbia made veritable progress in its cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and symbolic politics. Tadić supported a symbolic policy of facing the past and reconciliation that was warmly welcomed by the international community, although his successor, President Tomislav Nikolić, has since adopted another line. Only days after his electoral success the latter stated that Serbia should be acquitted of a past in which nobody could live.
    [Show full text]
  • Javni Poziv Fmroi 2019 – Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Za Rekonstrukciju Stambenih Objekata – Grad Bijeljina
    JAVNI POZIV FMROI 2019 – KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA ZA REKONSTRUKCIJU STAMBENIH OBJEKATA – GRAD BIJELJINA Red.br. Ime i prezime Adresa sanacije/Sadašnja adresa Broj bodova 1. Kasić (Mujo) Avdulaziz Braće Lazić 227, Bijeljina 220 Braće Lazić 227, Bijeljina 2. Alijević (Ruždija) Šefik Nikole Tesle 23, Bijeljina 210 1. maj 31, Janja 3. Bilalić (Mehmed) Vahidin Drinska 107, Janja 210 Drinska 107, Janja 4. Halilović Admir Mehmed N.Tesle bb Bijeljina 200 Mula Alije Sadikovića 21 Bijeljina 5. Krivić (Ramo) Enes Dž. Bijedića 15, Bijeljina 200 Dž. Bijedića 15, Bijeljina 6. Krilašević (Osman) Mevludin I.L. Ribara 15, Bijeljina 200 Bobarovača 15, Bijeljina 7. Osmanović (Zinija) Adi Jurija Gagarina 39, Bijeljina 200 Jurija Gagarina 39, Bijeljina 8. Sivčević (Ohran) Osman Đorđa Vasića 41, Janja 200 Brzava 77, Janja 9. Spahić (Nedžib) Mensur Braće Lazić 203, Bijeljina 190 Braće Lazić 203, Bijeljina 10. Alibegović (Ibrahim) Sakib M.M. Dizdara 63, Bijeljina 190 M.M. Dizdara 63, Bijeljina 11. Pobrklić (Jusuf) Mensur Braće Lazić bb, Janja 180 Dž. Bijedića 36, Janja 12. Hrustić (Omer) Sead 24. Septembar 14, Bijeljina 180 24. Septembar 14, Bijeljina 13. Godušić (Ragib) Nešat M.M. Dizdara 19A, Bijeljina 180 M.M. Dizdara 19A, Bijeljina 14. Demirović (Emin) Mustafa Desanke Maksimović 46, Bijeljina 180 Desanke Maksimović 46, Bijeljina 15. Karjašević (Huso) Ahmed Mlade Bosne 5, Bijeljina 180 Mlade Bosne 5, Bijeljina 16. Tuzlaković (Muhamed) Emir Miloša Obilića 104, Bijeljina 180 Miloša Obilića 106, Bijeljina 17. Bajrić (Alija) Mujo D. Tucovića 32, Bijeljina 180 D. Tucovića 32, Bijeljina 18. Osmanagić (Mustafa) Omer Brzava 119, Bijeljina 170 Brzava 119, Bijeljina 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropods in the Basin of the River Fojni^Ka
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Ribarstvo 66, 2008, (3), 119 —129 A.^i~i} –Mo~i} et al.: Gastropods in the basin of the river Fojni~ka ISSN 1330 –061X UDK: 594.3(28)(497.6) CODEN RIBAEG Original scientific paper GASTROPODS IN THE BASIN OF THE RIVER FOJNI^KA A. ^i~i} –Mo~i} 1, R. [krijelj 2, S. \ug 2 Summary The first detailed investigation of Gastropods in the basin of river Fojni~ka has been carried out in 2001 –2002. The material has been sam - pled five times during four seasons (October 2001 –September 2002) at 11 sites in the following waterways: the rivers Fojni~ka, Draga~a, @eljeznica, Kre{evka and Lepenica. Measurement of certain physical and chemical parameters (BOD 5, water temperature, pH value, amount of dissolved ox- ygen, saturation with oxygen and one time measurement of concentration of nitrates and phosphates) has been carried out together with collecting of macroinvertebrates of zoobenthos. Since the knowledge of biodiversity of Gastropods in Bosnia and Herzegovina is at the very low level, the main objective of this paper is to give an overview of distribution of Gas- tropods communities in the Fojni~ka river basin. In these investigations, 11 taxa of Gastropods and 1468 individuals have been determined. The Gastropods made 16% of total settlement of macroinvertebrates of zoobenthos. Dominant species at investigated sites was Ancylus fluviatilis , while species Acicula sp. , Saxurinator sp . and Valvata piscinalis were just sporadically recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina O O Indictment
    Sud £¡H / Cyfl GnX Kfivicno cdjeljenje ¡ Apelaciono odjeljenj«/ KpMBKSHo cftjejo€hbe K Ane/ia^hoHO OAfefbert* Odjcl I i Oc je III / Ofljs/i I * Ofl|»/i II Odsjek za sudsfcu upravu/Oflejes 33 cy/^cicy ynpsoy BOSNIA AND HERZEGO PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BIH fflGWJ) U^/vfA q^ SARAJEVO Number: KT-RZ-10/05 Sarajevo, 12 December 2005 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - Preliminary Hearing Judge - Pursuant to Article 35 (2) (h) and Article 226 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code of BiH, I hereby issue the O INDICTMENT AGAINST: 1. STUPAR MILOS, a.k.a. "MISO", son of Slavojka (maiden name Ninic), born 7 December 1963 in TiSci, Sekovici where he is holding permanent residence, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, police officer, married, father of four children, served the Army in 1982 in Nis, average financial situation, with no previous conviction, criminal proceedings are being conducted against him for a criminal offence of light bodily injury, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH number: X-KRN-05/25 to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 2. TRIFUNOVlt MILENKO, a.k.a "COP", son of Ivan and Milojka Obradovic, O born 7 January 1968 in the village of Kostolomci, Srebrenica Municipality, residing in Skelani bb in his private house, of Serb ethnicity, citizen of BiH, JMBG: 0701967183154, trader, unemployed, completed Vocational Trade School, married, father of two minor children, expecting a newborn child, served the Army in 1987 in Pec and Prizren, with no military rank or medal, registered in military records of Srebrenica, indigent financial situation, no other criminal proceedings are being conducted against him, with no previous conviction, currently under custody by the Decision of the Court of BiH to last until 22 December 2005 at 11:00 hrs, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 4 SRB Assessment
    Status of transboundary waters in South Eastern Europe Characterization Report on the Sava River Basin Dejan Komatina, Ph.D. Civ. Eng., Secretary, ISRBC General description of the basin • The Sava River Basin as a Danube sub-basin – Basin area: 95 720 km 2 (the second largest, after the Tisza basin) – Average flow (at the mouth): 1722 m 3/s (the largest tributary) – River length: 940 km (586 km of which were navigable before the war) Country Share of the Share of the basin (%) territory (%) Albania 0.1 0.5 Bosnia & Herzegovina 40 76 Croatia 26 45 Montenegro 7.5 52 Serbia 15.4 17 Slovenia 11 53 Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 2 Overview (location) of the SRB Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 3 Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 4 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 5 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 6 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 7 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 8 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 9 Values / uses / threats Int. Workshop on ITWRM in SEE, Sarajevo, 18-20 May 2009 10 Land cover/land use in the SRB Land class % Artificial surfaces 2,23 Agricultural areas 42,36 Forests and semi natural areas 54,71 Wetland 0,08 Inland water 0,63 Int.
    [Show full text]
  • International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995
    International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 Rapporteur Report The Hague June 29-July 1, 2015 International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 Conference in The Hague, June 29 – July 1, 2015 Executive Summary Leading decision-makers from more than a dozen countries gathered in The Hague from June 29 to July 1, 2015, to consider the failure of the international community to protect the United Nations “safe area” of Srebrenica, resulting in the largest massacre in Europe since World War II. Participants included three former members of the UN Security Council, senior government and UN officials, peacekeepers, and eyewitnesses to the Srebrenica tragedy. Over the course of four working sessions, a public event, and numerous informal meetings, conference participants focused on a disastrous two-year chain of events that culminated in the fall of Srebrenica in July 1995. They examined the origins of the “safe area” policy, beginning with the March 1993 visit to Srebrenica by French General Philippe Morillon, and disagreements on how to implement frequently impractical Security Council resolutions. The discussion revealed sharp disconnects between the policy-makers in New York, the peacekeepers on the ground, and the people the “safe areas” were ostensibly designed to keep safe. “I saw this conference as a kind of truth commission,” said Srebrenica survivor Muhamed Duraković. “Twenty years on, we cannot bring back the dead, but we can learn from what went wrong in Srebrenica. If we are not able to go through the process of fact-finding, truth, and reconciliation, we may be creating problems for future generations.” At the heart of the international failure in Srebrenica in July 1995 was the inability of the major powers to devise and implement an agreed strategy for ending the defining conflict of the immediate post-Cold War era.
    [Show full text]
  • 173 /20 Sarajevo,12.6.2020.Godine Na Osnovu Člana 56. Zakona O
    Bosna i Hercegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA FEDERALNO MINISTARSTVO RASELJENIH MINISTRY OF DISPLACED PERSONS AND OSOBA I IZBJEGLICA REFUGEES OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Broj: 03-32-3-65- 173 /20 Sarajevo,12.6.2020.godine Na osnovu člana 56. Zakona o organizaciji organa uprave u Federaciji BiH („Službene novine Federacije BiH“ broj:35/05), člana 22. Pravilnika o unutrašnjoj organizaciji Federalnog ministarstva raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, broj: 02-02-1967-11/18 od 04. mart 2019. godine, a u vezi sa objavljenim Javnim pozivom za refundiranje troškova poreza I doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska, broj: 03-32-3-65-1/20 od 14.4.2020. godine, a u skladu sa Procedurama za izbor potencijalnih učesnika u programu pomoći za refundiranje troškova poreza i doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska, broj: 03-32-3-65-2-2/20 od 22.5.2020.godine, na prijedlog Komisije za razmatranje prijava, imenovane Rješenjem broj: 03-32-3- 65-2/20 od 20.4.2020. godine, federalni ministar raseljenih osoba i izbjeglica, d o n o s i O D L U K U O UTVRĐIVANJU LISTE POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA POMOĆI po Javnom pozivu za refundiranje troškova poreza i doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska I Ovom odlukom vrši se ocjenjivanje prijavljenih kandidata po osnovu ispunjavanja/neispunjavanja uslova za učešće u programu refundiranja troškova poreza i doprinosa za uposlene povratnike na području entiteta Republika Srpska . II Lista potencijalnih korisnika pomoći koji ispunjavaju uslove iz Javnog poziva, raspoređeni prema općinama implementacije projekta, kako slijedi: ISPUNJENOST RED.BR.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Investigation of the Cerska Grave Site William
    01493690 FORENSIC INVESПGA ПОN OF ТНЕ CERSKA GRAVE SIТE BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ~ ~ Excavadon: July 7, 1996 through July 18, 1996 Examination: July 31, 1996 through August 22, 1996 1 VOLUMEI 1 1 1 WiШam Haglund, Ph.D. 1 Senior Forensic Advisor Intemational Criminal Tribunal for the Foпner Yugoslavia 1 and the Staff of Phys:idans for Human Rights, Boston Е t June 15, 1998 Е Phys:iclans for Human Rights 1 100 Boylston Street, Suite 702 Boston, Musadausetts 02116 USA Tel. (617) 695-0041 1 Fax. ( бl 7) 695-0307 E-mail: [email protected] 1 http://www.phmsa.org 1. Е 1 ... " 01493691 Table of Contents с VOLUMEI 1. EXECUТIVE SUMMARY ..... ..... .......... ...................... vii 1. 11 INТRODUCПON ........................ ............................ 1 111. SIТE REPORT: EXCAVATION AND EXНUMAТION OF ТНЕ CERSКA ........ 2 1 А. General Methods .......................... .. ... .. ............ 2 1. Mapping ......................... .......... .- ........... 2 2. Photography ......... .................................. З 1 З. Evidence ............................. ............ ...... 4 В . Field Report: Exhumation of the Cerska Grave . ...... .. ...... .......... 5 1. Site Description . ............ .................. .. .. .. 5 1 2. Site Preparation .......... ..... ... .... .. ..... ...... .... 5 З. Recovery of Surface Evidence ... .. ...... .. .. ... .. 5 1 4. Excavation ....................... ..... ..... ..... .... 11 5. Exhumation ................................. ........... 11 6. Comments оп Excavation lssues .. ... .......... ....... .. 23
    [Show full text]