DOCSLIB.ORG

Sector Commands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sector Commands Sector Commands THE NEW Sector Commands By Michael Shumaker After September 11, the Maritime Homeland commands established in 1996 in New York and Baltimore, Security mission joined Search and Rescue (SAR) as the and later, San Diego. The late Rear Adm. Richard E. Bennis, top priorities of the United States Coast Guard. In his former Commanding Officer of Activities New York, said of January 2004 Commandant’s message to all Coast Guard the Activities model, “You know it was one-stop shopping personnel, Adm. Thomas Collins stressed that the need to for the community and it was one-stop shopping for the strengthen unity of command necessitated the adoption of Coast Guard. Everybody knew the buck stopped here. They integrated, operational field commands, called Sectors. knew exactly where to go. … We always have our missions “This initiative will best position the Coast Guard to sup- and we are a multi-mission organization, and you saw that port our Secretary in achieving unity of purpose as one in Activities New York.” team for one fight.” While all Coast Guard field commands performed Groups, Marine Safety Offices (MSO), and Vessel Traffic admirably after September 11, the Activities commands in Shinn Andrew PA3 by USCG photo Service (VTS), are being merged into Sector Commands. particular demonstrated the unity of effort, mission flexibili- Previously, a Group and its units provided SAR, maritime ty, and responsiveness required for today’s Maritime law enforcement, and recreational boating safety, and main- Homeland Security mission. Capt. Roger Peoples, former tained aids to navigation. MSOs performed complementa- Commanding Officer of Activities Baltimore, whose respon- ry activities, enforcing federal laws and regulations related sibilities included the maritime security of Washington, to the safety and security of vessels, port facilities, and the D.C., on September 11, observed, “While the Coast Guard marine environment, and assisting other law enforcement responded well to 9/11 in all of our nation’s ports, Coast agencies. The new Sector organizations are based on the Guard leadership took special notice of the efficiency and Activities prototype unity of effort demonstrated by Activities New York and 24 Sector Commands Activities Baltimore in ensuring maritime security following COAST GUARD SECTOR ORGANIZATION the attacks in New York City and near our nation’s capital.” Before 2004, field operations in a single port fell under mul- The new Sector organizational construct represents a tiple, mission-based commands (Group, MSO, and VTS) transformation from a Coast Guard traditionally organized that were physically dispersed, had unique chains of com- around its operational programs to one organized around mand and different program managers at Coast Guard core operational service delivery processes. It focuses the Headquarters, lacked a consistent voice to the public, and coordinated efforts of all assigned operational capabilities had some mission overlap. to accomplish Coast Guard mission objectives. It recog- The attacks of September 11 called for a new Coast nizes that, in a broad sense, all Coast Guard operational Guard unity of effort that was cumbersome to achieve activities focus on prevention of an incident or illegal event, using the previous multiple command port-level structure. or on response to an emergency where prompt action mit- The Coast Guard’s move from the Department of igates loss of life or property, or adverse environmental Transportation to the Department of Homeland Security impact. The command and control processes the Coast and implementation of the Maritime Transportation Guard uses to execute those two operational business Security Act provided further impetus to restructure. areas are interrelated, but so sufficiently distinct that they Sector Commander CMC Safety Officer Senior Reserve Officer Auxiliary Coordinator Deputy Sector Commander Contingency Planning & Force Readiness Sector Command Center Intel Logistics Response Prevention Admin/Pers Incident Mgmt Inspection Finance/Sup Enforcement Waterways Mgt Engineering Investigation Opposite: Petty Officer 3rd Class Dustin Ridgeway patrols near the Leonard P. Zakim bridge in Boston. The new Sector Command organization integrates shore commands to improve unity of effort, responsiveness and mission flexibility. Above: Figure 1. Sector Organizational Construct. Courtesy of U.S. Coast Guard Coast Courtesy of U.S. 25 Sector Commands Coast Guard Petty Officer Brett Patterson, crewmember of Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron (HITRON), Jacksosonville, Fla., mans an M 240 machine gun on board an MH-68A Stingray helicopter during a homeland security patrol around New York City. Activities Commands in New York and Baltimore performed particularly well in the wake of September 11. can be managed as two separate but complementary intelligence regarding unlicensed operators carrying pas- processes, called Prevention and Response. sengers may result in a combined safety (Prevention) and The first focuses largely on gaining private sector com- law enforcement (Response) boarding that may identify pliance with regulatory standards and the design and safety and documentation deficiencies as well as fisheries maintenance of waterway systems to prevent incidents. or other law enforcement violations. The second concentrates on command and control activ- The Prevention Department consists of three divisions. ities associated with incident response and/or security Inspections Division manages and oversees the regulatory enforcement. These processes are actualized by two gen- and inspection aspects of the Coast Guard’s safety, securi- eral operational skill sets. In his May 2004 Decision ty, and environmental protection responsibilities for ves- Memo, the Commandant determined that “Prevention sels and facilities. Waterways Management Division con- requires expertise in the technical understanding and trols aids to navigation; safety and security zones; practical conduct of verification inspections of vessels, Regulated Navigation Areas; ice breaking; and VTS and waterway safety and security standards, and waterway AIS. Investigations Division initiates inquiries into marine analyses. Response requires proficiency in high tempo casualties, pollution, boating violations, and assessment of command, control and communications processes and civil penalties. the exercise of response and security enforcement The Response Department addresses SAR, pollution, expertise to accomplish incident command and crisis and all hazards via its Incident Management Division. management.” Enforcement Division enforces all laws and treaties and The Commandant envisions the relationship between carries out PWCS enforcement activities, such as armed Prevention and Response as one of collaborative interde- boardings, vessel escorts and security zone enforcement. pendence to accomplish all objectives. In some circum- This division works closely with federal, state, and local stances, one department will be supported and the other law enforcement and sister agencies within the DHS to supporting. Boats, people, and equipment are assigned to respond to and mitigate the impact of maritime threats. one of these two departments based on where they con- One of the four essential features the Commandant duct the majority of their work, with the understanding required for Sectors was unit level maintenance and organ- they may support the other department in certain situa- ic engineering, personnel, medical support, and tions. The result is a unity of effort across all departments finance/supply functions. The Logistics Department per- and new focus on multi-mission operations. For example, forms those functions for the entire Sector. USCG photo PA2 Mike Hvozda Mike PA2 USCG photo 27 Sector Commands Figure 2. Coast Guard Sectors as of June 9, 2005 Engineering/Support Division administers electronics and As of June 2005, 31 of the anticipated 35 total Sectors have computer system, naval, aviation, vehicle, and facilities already been approved. Full implementation of Sector engineering; armory and small arms qualification; and envi- Commands will be completed in 2006, although facility ronmental compliance. The associated Integrated Support construction needs may take longer. Command or Aircraft Repair and Supply Center handle The Sector Commander (SC) reports to the District intermediate and depot level maintenance. Medical, train- Commander for accomplishment of all Coast Guard mission ing, housing, and educational services reside in the objectives and serves as the single point of contact for mar- Administrative/Personnel Division. Finance/Supply itime stakeholders within the Sector. In support of the Division encompasses galley, transportation, and property Commandant’s concept of providing “one team for one and inventory management. Logistics Department Heads fight,” the SC will partner with other DHS agencies in pursuit can aspire to command a Sector as a Captain (O-6). of departmental goals and objectives. The SC serves as the Command and control will be centralized to serve all Captain of the Port (COTP) and Federal Maritime Security three components and field units. Those Groups that are Coordinator (FMSC). Unless otherwise assigned, the SC is far removed from the Sector homeport will be designated also the Officer in Charge Marine Inspections (OCMI), SAR as Sector Field Offices and will support outlying field units Mission Coordinator (SMC), and Federal On-Scene Guard Coast
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE NAVAL SERVICE.Tif
    CHAPTER TWELVE THE NAVAL SERVICE Ninety percent of the world's commerce travels by sea; the vast majority of the world's population lives within a few hundred miles of the oceans; nearly three quarters of the planet is covered by water. Seapower protects the American way of life. -A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower Every danger of a military character to which the United States is exposed can be met best outside her own territory-at sea. -Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan n 2007 the U.S. Coast Guard, Marine Corps, and Navy issued A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower, representing the first time the three services I jointly crafted a maritime strategy. The document stresses the naval services' mutual commitment to protecting the homeland and winning and preventing wars. Proliferation of weapons and information technology to transnational threats and rogue states poses an increasing range of threats to U.S. security interests. In addition to threats from kinetic weapons, hybrid warfare threats (e.g., financial, cyber) pose new challenges for the sea services, demanding a coordinated strategy and response. To better understand how responsibility for security in the maritime domain is shared among the sea services, this chapter describes organization, mis­ sion, and capabilities of each. 157 158 Naval Officer's Guide The Department of the Navy The Department of the Navy (DON) is to "be organized, trained, and equipped primarily for prompt and sustained combat incident to operations at sea'' (Navy Regulations art. 0202). The National Security Act of i947, as amended in i949, gov­ erns the role of the Navy in national defense.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Program
    EnhancingEnhancing MaritimeMaritime OutreachOutreach Captain Steve Metruck Captain of the Port Puget Sound National Harbor Conference Seattle, WA May 12, 2008 May 23, 2007 Sector Seattle Vision Statement: “Multi-Mission Professionals safeguarding the Pacific Northwest’s maritime domain through dynamic leadership, partnership and stewardship.” 1 ToTo MultiMulti--missionmission SectorsSectors 2 ““SectorizedSectorized”” LegacyLegacy UnitsUnits Each with their own stakeholders 3 Area of Responsibility 4 5 New York Boston San Francisco Miami LA/LB San Diego Puget Sound: Size Comparison with other Major U.S. Ports Puget Sound: Size Comparison with other Major U.S. Ports PugetPuget SoundSound ChallengesChallenges 3500 sq. miles 15 Billion Gallons of Oil Moved Annually International Border with Canada. US Navy Strategic Port - 3rd Largest Domestic Port 1.3 Million Recreational Boating Population. Washington State Ferry System - 366,000 Washington State -largest in the nation registered (2007) -500+ transits on 10 routes daily ~5000 Deep Draft Ships Growing Cruise Ship Industry: Transits per year - 735K Cruise Ship Passengers in 2007, 200+ vessel arrivals Alaskan Fishing Fleet in 2007, 200+ vessel arrivals Homeport 4.1M TEU containers thru Seattle & Tacoma; 3rd largest in nation; SEA ‘05’s fastest growing U.S. port. 6 A Sector Commander wears many hats, including: Captain of the Port (Jurisdiction/Authorities) Federal Maritime Security Coordinator (HLS) Federal On-Scene Coordinator (Pollution) Officer in Charge of Marine Inspection Search
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Times
    CCOMMODORE’’S BBULLETIN && DDIRECTOR’’S NNEWSLETTER Changing Times Photo by Bret Fendt DSO‐PB Featured in this Issue: • Crossing the Bar • Welcome to New DIRAUX & OTO • District Cruise Director’s Newsletter 1 UNITED STATES COAST GUARD AUXILIARY COMMANDER (dpa-s) ELEVENTH COAST GUARD DISTRICT 1001 S. SEASIDE AVE, BLDG 39 | SAN PEDRO, CA 90731-7391 DISTRICT BRIDGE DISTRICT BOARD District Commodore (DCO) President of the COMO Michael Johnson Past Commanders’ Association (PPCA) Pat Swope District Chief of Staff (DCOS) Harry Jacobs Division Commanders (DCDR) Director of Auxiliary (DIRAUX) Division 1 ........................... Dale Matthews CDR Greg Matlin Division 2 ............................Steve Nesmith Division 3 .................... Tom Jacobsmeyer District Captains (DCAPT) Division 4 .......................... Howard Levine Inland (I) Division 5 ............................ Sharon Blenn Mary Klock Division 7 ......................... Michael Brodey San Diego (SD) Division 9 ......................... Robert Lamorte Wally Berry Division 10 .................Carl (Bud) Gothann Division 11 .............................David White Los Angeles / Long Beach North (LA/LB-N) Division 12 ............................... Trent Kelly Bert Blanchette Division 13 ......................... Roger Helizon Los Angeles / Long Beach South (LA/LB-S) Division 14 ................................ Robert Uy Don Napolitano Division 15 ........................Darrell Hannon Division 16 .............................. Mary Davis Immediate Past District Commodore
    [Show full text]
  • ORAL HISTORY Lieutenant General John H. Cushman US Army, Retired
    ORAL HISTORY Lieutenant General John H. Cushman US Army, Retired VOLUME FOUR TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Pages Preface 1 18 Cdr Fort Devens, MA 18-1 to 18-18 19 Advisor, IV Corps/Military Region 4, Vietnam 19-1 to 19A-5 20 Cdr 101st Airborne Division & Fort Campbell, KY 20-1 to 20-29 Preface I began this Oral History with an interview in January 2009 at the US Army Military History Institute at Carlisle Barracks, PA. Subsequent interviews have taken place at the Knollwood Military Retirement Residence in Washington, DC. The interviewer has been historian Robert Mages. Until March 2011 Mr. Mages was as- signed to the Military History Institute. He has continued the project while assigned to the Center of Military History, Fort McNair, DC. Chapter Title Pages 1 Born in China 1-1 to 1-13 2 Growing Up 2-1 to 2-15 3 Soldier 3-1 to 3-7 4 West Point Cadet 4-1 to 4-14 5 Commissioned 5-1 to 5-15 6 Sandia Base 6-1 to 6-16 7 MIT and Fort Belvoir 7-1 to 7-10 8 Infantryman 8-1 to 8-27 9 CGSC, Fort Leavenworth, KS, 1954-1958 9-1 to 9-22 10 Coordination Group, Office of the Army Chief of Staff 10-1 to 10-8 11 With Cyrus Vance, Defense General Counsel 11-1 to 11-9 12 With Cyrus Vance, Secretary of the Army 12-1 to 12-9 13 With the Army Concept Team in Vietnam 13-1 to 13-15 14 With the ARVN 21st Division, Vietnam 14-1 to 14-19 15 At the National War College 15-1 to 15-11 16 At the 101st Airborne Division, Fort Campbell, KY 16-1 to 16-10 17 Cdr 2d Brigade, 101st Airborne Division, Vietnam 17-1 to 17-35 18 Cdr Fort Devens, MA 18-1 to 18-18 19 Advisor, IV Corps/Military Region 4, Vietnam 19-1 to 19A-5 20 Cdr 101st Airborne Division & Fort Campbell, KY 19-1 to 19-29 21 Cdr Combined Arms Center and Commandant CGSC 22 Cdr I Corps (ROK/US) Group, Korea 23 In Retirement (interviews for the above three chapters have not been conducted) For my own distribution in November 2012 I had Chapters 1 through 7 (Volume One) print- ed.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Boat Operations and Training (Boat) Manual, Volume Ii
    U.S. Coast Guard Boat Operations and Training (BOAT) Manual Volume II “Train, Maintain, Operate” COMDTINST M16114.33D February 2020 Commandant US Coast Guard Stop 7324 United States Coast Guard 2703 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE Washington, DC 20593-7324 Staff Symbol: CG-731 Phone: (202) 372-2515 COMDTINST M16114.33D 05 FEB 2020 COMMANDANT INSTRUCTION M16114.33D Subj: U.S. COAST GUARD BOAT OPERATIONS AND TRAINING (BOAT) MANUAL, VOLUME II Ref: a. U.S. Coast Guard Boat Operations and Training (BOAT) Manual Volume I, COMDTINST M16114.32 (series) b. Performance, Training, and Education Manual, COMDTINST M1500.10 (series) c. Rescue and Survival Systems Manual, COMDTINST M10470.10 (series) d. U.S. Coast Guard Boat Operations and Training (BOAT) Manual, Volume III, COMDTINST M16114.42 (series) e. U.S. Coast Guard Competency Dictionary f. U.S. Coast Guard Competency Management System Manual, COMDTINST M5300.2 (series) g. United States Coast Guard Regulations 1992, COMDTINST M5000.3 (series) h. Military Separations, COMDTINST M1000.4 (series) i. U.S. Coast Coast Guard Addendum to the National Search and Rescue Supplement (NSS) to the International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue Manual (IAMSAR), COMDTINST M16130.2 (series) j. Coast Guard Medical Manual, COMDTINST M6000.1 (series) k. Ordnance Manual, COMDTINST M8000.2 (series) l. Risk Management (RM), COMDTINST 3500.3 (series) m. Naval Engineering Manual, COMDTINST M9000.6 (series) n. Coatings and Color Manual, COMDTINST M10360.3 (series) DISTRIBUTION – SDL 170 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A X X X X X X B X X X X C X X X X D X X E X X X X F G X X H X NON-STANDARD DISTRIBUTION LIST: COMDTINST M16114.33D 1.
    [Show full text]
  • LCDR Michael D. Russell, U.S. Coast Guard (Ret)
    LCDR Michael D. Russell, U.S. Coast Guard (Ret) Turnaround Maritime Services POB 580128, Houston, Texas 77258-0128 USA Telephone (281) 326-3191 [email protected] EXPERIENCE Maritime safety consultant with over 34 years’ experience in several facets of maritime safety enforcement and management in the United States Coast Guard and the marine industry. January 1995 to Present: Maritime Consultant Turnaround Maritime Services, Houston, Texas, USA Since 1995 has provided advice & recommendations concerning litigation of maritime, boating & offshore incidents. Other services provided include marine casualty investigations, vessel inspections, cargo surveys, Coast Guard liaison, vetting, company & personnel audits, dock safety operations, Marine Safety Advisor, Pollution & Safety Advisor, American Bureau of Shipping Record reviews & towboat safety programs as well as training in all these areas. Clients include ship owners, operators, charterers, law firms, training centers, ports, investigation firms & towboat companies. Have interfaced with the USCG, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, OSHA, EPA, & other state & federal agencies. Accomplishments include: • Retained as a consultant for a dockman injured trying to throw off a mooring line in New Jersey • Provided expert report and testimony for a passenger vessel injury incident in the U. S. Virgin Islands • Served as oil company representative aboard propane ship inaugurating all buoy berth in Tuxpan, Mexico • Provided expert report and testimony involving a tow from Trinidad & Tobago to Galveston
    [Show full text]
  • The Cutter the Ewsletter of the Foundation for Coast Guard History 28 Osprey Dr
    The Cutter The ewsletter of the Foundation for Coast Guard History 28 Osprey Dr. ewsletter 29, Spring 2010 Gales Ferry, CT 06335 Bill of Lading On Monday, February 1, 2010, three FCGH Regents—Phil The Wardroom Volk, Neil Ruenzel and Rob Ayer—gathered at the Acad- From the Chairman p. 2 emy Officers Club in New London, CT, to receive the dona- From the Executive Director p. 3 tion to the Foundation of a painting by William H. Ravell, National Coast Guard Museum p. 4 CWO, USCG (Ret.). Mr. Ravell is a well-known artist, with From the Editor p. 6 a specialty in maritime themes. Main Prop Hamilton’s Revenue Cutters p. 7 The painting is titled “The U.S. Coast Guard — Then and Coast Guard Academy p. 12 Now (1915 – 2010).” It depicts two cutters and two fixed- Keeper Richard Etheridge wing aircraft: USCGC Tampa (1912-1918), a Curtis Flying and Pea Island Station p. 14 Boat (ca. 1915), NSC Bertholf (commissioned 2008), and an Tsarist Officer in the U.S. HC-144A "Ocean Sentry" (in service). It bears the following Coast Guard p. 16 inscription from the artist: “Painted and presented to the Prohibition and the Evolution of the “Constructive Presence” Doctrine p. 17 Discovery of U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Alexander Hamilton p. 19 Quentin Walsh Centennial p. 20 Evolution of Coast Guard Roles in Vietnam p. 22 Historic First Visit By a Coast Guard Cutter to the People’s Republic of China p. 24 Speakings Tribute to William D. Wilkinson p. 26 Memorials Restorers Seek Clues to Ship’s History p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Response to Hurricane Katrina: a Study of the Coast Guard's Culture, Organizational Design & Leadership in Crisis
    The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Study of the Coast Guard's Culture, Organizational Design & Leadership in Crisis By Gregory J. Sanial B.S. Marine Engineering, U.S. Coast Guard Academy, 1988 M.B.A. Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, 1997 M.A. National Security & Strategic Studies, U.S. Naval War College, 2002 Submitted to the MIT Sloan School of Management in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Management MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY at the JUL 0 2 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology L 2007 LIBRARIES June 2007 © Gregory J.Sanial. All rights reserved. ARCHIVES The author herby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: " , MIT Sloan School of Management May 11, 2007 Certified by: John Van Maanen Erwin H. Schell Professor of Organizational Studies Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Z, /, ,.- V •. Stephen J. Sacca Director, MIT Sloan Fellows Program in Innovation and Global Leadership The Response to Hurricane Katrina: A Study of the Coast Guard's Culture, Organizational Design & Leadership in Crisis By Gregory J. Sanial Submitted to the M IT Sloan School of Management on May 11, 2007 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Management ABSTRACT Hurricane Katrina slammed into the United States Gulf Coast early on August 28, 2005 killing almost 2,000 people and causing $81 billion in damages making Katrina the costliest natural disaster in United States history. The sheer magnitude of the devastation and destruction in New Orleans and the surrounding area remains incomprehensible to many disaster planners.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-20-562, COAST GUARD: Actions Needed to Ensure Investments In
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters July 2020 COAST GUARD Actions Needed to Ensure Investments in Key Data System Meet Mission and User Needs GAO-20-562 July 2020 COAST GUARD Actions Needed to Ensure Investments in Key Data System Meet Mission and User Needs Highlights of GAO-20-562, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Coast Guard, within the The U.S. Coast Guard’s (Coast Guard) Marine Information for Safety and Law Department of Homeland Security Enforcement (MISLE) system is generally able to support agency operations by (DHS), is the principal federal agency tracking and aggregating mission activity data, such as commercial vessel responsible for maritime safety and inspection results. But the system has some capability gaps, and MISLE users security. The Coast Guard maintains GAO spoke to described numerous challenges with the system. For example, and uses MISLE—a data system that they reported: tracks and reports results data for nearly all Coast Guard missions. • challenges using MISLE due to duplicate or incomplete records in the system, which can affect the ability of personnel to conduct activities such as GAO was asked to review the status vessel inspections. Users told GAO that duplicate or incomplete records can of MISLE and efforts to update it. This report examines (1) the extent to create a risk that Coast Guard personnel may not have full vessel histories which MISLE supports Coast Guard when inspecting vessels to resolve prior safety deficiencies; and operations and decision-making; (2) • being unable to complete work in MISLE while conducting operational the extent to which the Coast Guard activities, since users can only access the system from a workstation has policies, procedures, and training connected to the Coast Guard network.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2019-4 15
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-4 15 Jul - 16 Aug 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime 20 RISK OCT
    Maritime 20 RISK OCT. 26-30,2020 OCT. UIUC Symposium 20 Welcome to the Maritime Risk Symposium 2020 The Critical Infrastructure Resilience Institute (CIRI), a Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence, is host of the 11th Annual Maritime Risk Symposium (MRS 2020) in collaboration with the National Academy of Sciences. The theme of MRS 2020 is “Maritime Resilience in Black Swan Events.” DHS defines resilient infrastructure systems as the “ability of systems, infrastructures, government, business, communities, and individuals to resist, tolerate, absorb, recover from, prepare for, or adapt to an adverse occurrence that causes harm, destruction, or loss of national significance.” Through presentations, panels and open forums, the symposium will focus on the attributes of resilience to adversarial events of national significance in the maritime domain, using our experience with COVID-19 as a driver for the discussion. The objective is less about the specific impacts COVID-19 had and is having, and more on how that event informs us on resiliency for future global upsets, in terms of what works, what gaps have been exposed, and what research questions ought to be studied as a first step towards enhancing Maritime Resilience. Agenda 26 All times are in Central Time. Time Event Speakers 9:45AM Day 1 Introduction David Nicol Monday th 10:00AM Keynote* Dr. Stephen Flynn 11:00AM–12:30PM Panel** Resilience in Maritime Infrastructure Moderator/Chair: Captain Todd Bonnar 1:30–3:00PM Panel** Maritime Resilience and the Human Element Moderator/Chair:
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Safety Manual, Volume I, Administration and Management, Comdtinst M16000.6
    Commandant 2100 2nd ST, SW Stop 7355 United States Coast Guard Washington, DC 20593-7355 Staff Symbol: CG-5431 Phone: (202) 372-1001 Fax: (202) 372-2900 COMDTCHANGENOTE 16000 20 APRIL 2012 COMMANDANT CHANGE NOTICE 16000 Subj: CH-14 TO MARINE SAFETY MANUAL (MSM), VOLUME I, ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT, COMDTINST M16000.6 1. PURPOSE. This Commandant Change Notice provides changes to the subject Manual for the information, use and guidance of Coast Guard personnel assigned to marine safety duties. 2. ACTION. All Coast Guard unit commanders, commanding officers, officers-in-charge, deputy/assistant commandants, and chiefs of headquarters staff elements shall comply with the provisions of this Commandant Change Notice. Internet release is authorized. 3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. NONE. 4. SUMMARY OF CHANGES. The enclosed Chapter 10, Occupational Health and Safety Program, cancels the existing chapter and provides updated information while also incorporating the relevant policy information from cancelled COMDTNOTE 16000 - Confined Space Entry Policy Aboard Merchant Vessels for Marine Safety and Environmental Protection Personnel. This change establishes Appendix D – Confined Space Entry Policy Questions and Answers. 5. PROCEDURES. Remove and replace the following sections of Marine Safety Manual Volume I, Administration and Management, COMDTINST M16000.6: Remove Insert Chapter 10 Table of Contents, CH-3 Chapter 10 Table of Contents, CH-14 Chapter 10, CH-3 Chapter 10, CH-14 Chapter 10 Appendices A, B, C, E, F and G Chapter 10 Appendices A, B, C, E, F and G, CH-14 DISTRIBUTION – SDL No. 159 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z A B X X X XXXX C X XXX D X X X XX E X XX F G H NON-STANDARD DISTRIBUTION: 6.
    [Show full text]