Chapter 3 Structure Plans and Appendix 2 Decisions

Structure Plans – General Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Wilson David 1244.001 3 Structure Support in Undertake a Structure Planning exercise for the area surrounding Reject The undertaking a structure planning exercise for the area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken in Jolly Plans part Temple View village. Amend Volume 1 – Section 3 – Structure Plans as an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. follows:

Add a new section 3.8 – Temple View with chapter headings of a similar nature to those that apply to Peacocke, , and as follows:

Introduction Vision Objectives and Policies Structure Plan components WJ & MR FS8.003 Support Reject Laverty (Feathers Planning Limited) WR & JM FS9.002 Support Reject FALCONER (Feathers Further submissions 8.003, 9.002 and 180.009 are rejected as 1244.001 have been rejected. Planning Limited) The Church of FS180.009 Support Reject Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board Simon Dyke 1245.001 Support in Undertake a Structure Planning process for the area surrounding Reject The undertaking a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken in Farms Ltd part Temple View village. Amend Volume 1 – Section 3 – Structure Plans as an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. follows:

Add a new section 3.8 – Temple View with chapter headings of a similar nature to those that apply to Peacocke, Rototuna, Rotokauri and Ruakura as follows:

Introduction Vision Objectives and Policies Structure Plan components WJ & MR FS8.002 Support Reject Laverty (Feathers Planning Limited) WR & JM FS9.003 Support Reject Further submissions 8.002, 9.003 and 180.01 are rejected as 1245.001 have been rejected. FALCONER (Feathers Planning Limited) The Church of FS180.01 Support Reject

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 1 of 63

Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board Jon Francis & 1254.001 Support in Undertake a Structure Plan exercise for the area surrounding Temple Reject The undertaking a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken in Elizabeth Howie part View village. Amend Volume 1 – Section 3 – Structure Plans as follows: an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. Jarvis Add a new section 3.8 – Temple View with chapter headings of a similar nature to those that apply to Peacocke, Rototuna, Rotokauri and Ruakura as follows:

Introduction Vision Objectives and Policies Structure Plan components WJ & MR FS8.001 Support Reject Laverty (Feathers Planning Limited) WR & JM FS9.004 Support Reject FALCONER (Feathers Further submissions 8.001, 9.004 and 180.011 are rejected as 1254.001 have been rejected. Planning Limited) The Church of FS180.011 Support Reject Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board W.J. & M.R. 313.001 Support in Include a Structure Plan for Temple View in Section 3- Structure Plans as Reject The undertaking a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken in Laverty part set out in the submission. an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. The Church of FS180.007 Support Reject Further submission 180.007 is rejected as 313.001 has been rejected. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board W.R & J.M 360.001 Support in A Structure Plan for Temple View is developed for inclusion in Section 3 Reject The idea of undertaking a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be Falconer part - Structure Plans. undertaken in an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. The Church of FS180.008 Support Reject Further submission 180.008 is rejected as 360.001 has been rejected. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board The Church of 1201.001 Support in Amend Chapter 3 Structure Plans to include Temple View via a formal Reject The undertaking a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken in Jesus Christ of part structure planning exercise as set out in the submission. an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. Latter Day Saints Trust Board WJ & MR Laverty FS8.004 Support Reject (Feathers Planning Limited) WR & JM FS9.001 Support Reject Further submission 8.004 and 9.001 are rejected as submission 1201.001 has been rejected. FALCONER (Feathers Planning Limited) Meiana Jenelle FS27.002 Oppose Accept Further submission 27.002 is accepted as submission 1201.001 has been rejected. Nin

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 2 of 63

Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001 Oppose Reject This submission is not related to the matters contained in 1201.001.

Jodhi Ponga FS279.001 Support Reject

Further submission 279.001 and 284.001 are rejected as submission 1201.001 has been rejected. Temple View FS284.001 Support Reject Heritage Society Robert W. Belbin 291.003 Support in Include a section for Temple View within Rule 3.0 Structure Plans. Reject The undertaking a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken in part an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process. The Church of FS180.005 Support Reject Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board Further submission 180.005 and 180.006 are rejected as submission 291.003 has been rejected. The Church of FS180.006 Support Reject Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board The Church of 1201.002 Support in Amend Appendix 2 Structure Plans to include Temple View as a Reject The undertaking of a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken Jesus Christ of part structure plan area. in an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process.This would involve a separate Latter Day Saints variation or plan change to the district plan. Trust Board Meiana Jenelle FS27.001 Oppose Accept Further submission 27.001 is accepted as submission 1201.002 has been rejected Nin Rakaipaka Puriri FS275.001 Oppose Reject This submission is not related to the matters contained in 1201.002.

Jodhi Ponga FS279.001 Support Reject

Further submission 279.001 and 284.002 are rejected as submission 1201.002 has been rejected Temple View FS284.002 Support Reject Heritage Society Wilson David 1244.002 Support in Amend Volume 2, Appendix 2 – Structure Plans Locality Guide by adding Reject The undertaking of a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken Jolly part an additional legend to depict the Temple View Structure Plan. Further in an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process.This would involve a separate amendments are required by adding additional Figures 2-20, 2-21 and variation or plan change to the district plan. 2-22 as required.

Any other consequential and related amendments to other rules as required. The Church of FS180.09 Support Reject Further submission 180.09 is rejected as submission 1244.002 has been rejected Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board Simon Dyke 1245.002 Support in Amend Volume 2, Appendix 2 – Structure Plans Locality Guide by adding Reject The undertaking of a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken Farms Ltd part an additional legend to depict the Temple View Structure Plan. Further in an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process.This would involve a separate amendments are required by adding additional Figures 2-20, 2-21 and variation or plan change to the district plan. 2-22 as required.

Any other consequential and related amendments to other rules as required. The Church of FS180.091 Support Reject Further submission 180.091 is rejected as submission 1244.002 has been rejected Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board Jon Francis & 1254.002 Support in Amend Volume 2, Appendix 2 – Structure Plans Locality Guide by adding Reject The undertaking of a structure planning exercise for the Temple View area is supported. However, such a process must be undertaken Elizabeth Howie part an additional legend to depict the Temple View Structure Plan. Further in an integrated and collaborative manner that is best achieved through a separate First Schedule process.This would involve a separate Jarvis amendments are required by adding additional Figures 2-20, 2-21 and variation or plan change to the district plan. 2-22 as required.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 3 of 63

Any other consequential and related amendments to other rules as required. Hounsell 1104.003 Oppose Figures relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan (Figure 3.6.2a, b, c, d, e, Reject Figures 3.6.2a to 3.6.2g are directly related to the structure plan text and their placement within chapter 3 will assist in the clarity and Holdings Ltd f, and g) should be included in the Appendix 2. understanding and usability of the Plan. It is not considered appropriate to relocate the figures to Appendix 2 as part of the Rotokauri Structure Plan.

Porter Properties 1164.003 Oppose Figures relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan (Figure 3.6.2a, b, c, d, e, Reject Figures 3.6.2a to 3.6.2g are directly related to the structure plan text and their placement within chapter 3 will assist in the clarity and Ltd f, and g) should be included in the Appendix 2. understanding and usability of the Plan. It is not considered appropriate to relocate the figures to Appendix 2 as part of the Rotokauri Structure Plan. Hamilton JV 1170.003 Oppose Figures relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan (Figure 3.6.2a, b, c, d, e, Reject Figures 3.6.2a to 3.6.2g are directly related to the structure plan text and their placement within chapter 3 will assist in the clarity and Investment f, and g) should be included in the Appendix 2. understanding and usability of the Plan. It is not considered appropriate to relocate the figures to Appendix 2 as part of the Rotokauri Company Ltd Structure Plan. Hounsell 1104.004 Appendix 2 Oppose (Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g relating Reject Figures 3.6.2a to 3.6.2g are directly related to the structure plan text and their placement within chapter 3 will assist in the clarity and Holdings Ltd Structure to the Rotokauri Structure Plan should be included in the Appendix 2. understanding and usability of the Plan. It is not considered appropriate to relocate the figures to Appendix 2 as part of the Rotokauri Plans Structure Plan.

Porter Properties 1164.004 Oppose Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g relating Reject Figures 3.6.2a to 3.6.2g are directly related to the structure plan text and their placement within chapter 3 will assist in the clarity and Ltd to the Rotokauri Structure Plan should be included in the Appendix 2. understanding and usability of the Plan. It is not considered appropriate to relocate the figures to Appendix 2 as part of the Rotokauri Structure Plan.

Hamilton JV 1170.004 Oppose Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g relating Reject Figures 3.6.2a to 3.6.2g are directly related to the structure plan text and their placement within chapter 3 will assist in the clarity and Investment to the Rotokauri Structure Plan should be included in the Appendix 2. understanding and usability of the Plan. It is not considered appropriate to relocate the figures to Appendix 2 as part of the Rotokauri Company Ltd Structure Plan. Structure Plan 3.1 Purpose Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Deborah June 282.001 3.1 Purpose Oppose Prior to a Structure Plan being included in the District Plan require the Reject The structure plans (apart from the Ruakura Structure Plan) included in the Plan have all passed through the 1st Schedule RMA process Fisher following: and outline the future growth and development expectations of the city in line with the PRPS and HUGS. 1. Structure Plans to publicly provide an Environmental Impact Report prior to their inclusion in the District Plan. The structure plans included within the Plan have been transferred from the Operative District Plan (ODP). Prior to their adoption 2. Details of proposed adverse environment effects and the level of within the ODP, they were all processed under the first schedule of the RMA, 1991 (Variation 18 – Rotokauri, Variation 12 – Rototuna those effects. and Variation 14 – Peacockes). As such and in accordance with the Act, each variation was subject to extensive public consultation and 3. Evidence of Open Consultation with anyone potentially affected by a input, including the preparation of a number of background analysis and specialist reports covering a wide range of topics such as Structure Plan. ecological and landscape assessments, roading and infrastructure. As such, full consideration was been given to aspects such as the 4. Removal of current structure plans from the Proposed District Plan type and location of land uses with the aim of identifying the optimum spatial pattern taking into account the efficient use of land, that has not met these conditions. environmental protection, amenity, the need to support and protect appropriate existing land use and opportunities for economic 5. Require Industrial Structure Plans to provide a "Noise Management development. Plan" similar to that of Appendix 1-5-21 prior to inclusion. The structure plans have been retained in the plan as it would reduce the effectiveness of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies if they were removed The Church of FS180.001 Oppose Accept FS180.001 is accepted as submission 282.001 has been rejected. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board Future Proof 608.005 Support Future Proof supports 3.1 Purpose and 3.2 Principles set out in the Accept in This submission is in support of 3.1 and 3.2. and is accepted in part as the provisions that the submission seeks to retain have been Implementation Structure Plan chapter and seeks the retention of those sections as Part amended in response to other submissions Committee notified. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Lynette Joyce 1050.001 Support Retain the flow chart in 3.1 Purpose of Structure Plans. Accept in These submissions support the flow chart (3.1 a). They are accepted in part as the provision that the submissions seek to retain has Williams Part been amended in response to other submissions Niall Baker 1158.001 Support Retain the flow chart in section 3.1 (Structure Plan Purpose). Accept in See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Part Waikato Regional 714.004 Support in 3.1 Purpose (Structure Plans). Amend the diagram in 3.1a) to include Accept This submission supports 3.1. The proposed amendments will improve the: Council part reference to Strategic Framework objectives and policies.  Internal consistency of the Plan  Clarity of the Plan for users See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 4 of 63

Chedworth 1171.006 Support in Supports intent of 3.1 d) (Structure Plans - Purpose) - seeks Properties Ltd part amendments, as set out in the submission in respect of the land use pattern, and recognising the need to provide for staging but in a way that recognises the uncertainties associated with long term growth. The submissions support 3.1 (Purpose). They are accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Waikato- 771.010 Support in Amendments are sought, as set out in the submission, to the provisions  3.1 d) ii and iii are accepted as this will improve the effectiveness of the Plan in achieving the objective of integrated planning. Te Kauhanganui part in 3.1 (d) (Structure Plans Purpose) relating to the purpose of a Accept in  3.1 d) v has been amendment in response to another submission Inc Structure Plan in order to strengthen the policy in respect of the land Part

use pattern and recognise the need to provide for staging but in a way See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. that recognises the uncertainties associated with long term growth. Tainui Group 913.007 Support in Retain the Purpose of the Structure Plan Chapter with amendments to Holdings Ltd part include reference to future land use patterns, staging of development and fiscal/financial/commercial feasibility, as set out in the submission. William Cornelis FS160.001 Oppose Reject The further submissions are not related to the matters contained in 913.007. Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - 924.009 Support in Amend 3.1 d) v. to read as follows "Identifying the financial feasibility of Accept The submission supports 3.1 and the amendments will assist in the clarity, understanding and administration of the Plan. Transport Agency part the development from a Council, infrastructure provider and landowner perspective". Tainui Group FS196.015 Support Accept FS196.015 is accepted as submission 924.009 has been accepted. Holdings Limited Fonterra Co- 1200.007 Oppose Amend 3.1g) (Structure Plans - Purpose) to recognise that future Reject In accordance with the provisions of the RMA 1991, the resource consenting process is not the appropriate method to advance future operative Group structure plans or similar approaches could be promoted through a structure plans or strategic planning frameworks for a particular area or growth cell. Ltd resource consent process.

Future Proof FS181.003 Oppose Accept FS181.003 and 270.026 are accepted as 1200.007 has been rejected. Implementation Committee New Zealand FS270.026 Oppose Accept Transport Agency The Adare FS272.032 Support Reject FS272.032 is rejected as submission 1200.007 has been rejected. Company Ltd 3.2 Principles Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Future Proof 608.006 3.2 Support Supports the retention of the purpose and principles set out in the Implementation Principles Structure Plan chapter. The submissions support 3.2 and are accepted in part as amendments have been made in response to other submissions Accept in Committee Part New Zealand 924.010 Support Retain 3.2 Principles as notified. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Transport Agency Deborah June 282.020 Support in Require structure plans to identify potential effects, positive and Reject In accordance with the RMA and the principles in 3.2, all structure plans would need to demonstrate an understanding of the Fisher part negative on the surrounding environment and how these will be surrounding context including an understanding of the potential effects that the proposals may have on the surrounding area. mitigated or managed. Fonterra Co- 1200.008 Support in Amend 3.2 (Structure Plan Principles) to also refer to other appropriate Reject In accordance with the provisions of the RMA 1991, the resource consenting process is not considered to be the appropriate method to operative Group part strategic planning methods. advance future structure plans or strategic planning frameworks for a particular area or growth cell. Ltd Waikato Regional 714.005 Support in a) Add an introductory paragraph explaining how the principles are to Accept in The submission supports 3.2 and is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Council part be taken account of and implemented. Part  Changes to the introductory paragraph have been rejected as the current wording is considered appropriate.  The addition of a new principle to 3.2 a) is accepted as the amendments will improve the effectiveness of the Plan in terms of b) Add a principle to 3.2(a) as follows: achieving its stated objective for structure plans

'How existing values, and valued features of the area (including See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 5 of 63

amenity, landscape, natural character, ecological and heritage values, water bodies, high class soils and view catchments), will be managed' Lynette Joyce 1050.002 Support in Principles - Structure Plans - 3.2 a) i. - Replace ‘any land-use constraints Williams part and opportunities’ within this paragraph with ‘any land-use The terminology used is consistent with the approach to planning in general and is considered appropriate in the context of chapter 3. In order to ensure an area is properly understood it is neccessary for an analysis to be undertaken of the various strengths, weaknesses, considerations’. Support opportunities and constraints that exist. This analysis is then used to inform the development of the plan itself. Furthermore, the Plan in Part Niall Baker 1158.002 Support in 3.2 Principles actively promotes the preservation and enhancement of heritage sites both built and natural in a number of ways and through the part 3.2a) i. delete the text "any land-use constraints and opportunities" and provisions of chapter 19 in accordance with the RMA. replace with ‘any land-use considerations’. 3.3 Objectives and Policies - General Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Future Proof 608.007 3.3 Support Retain the Objectives and Policies under 3.3 Structure Plans Accept in This submission is in support of 3.3. It is accepted in part as the provisions that the submission seeks to retain have been amended in Implementation Objectives Part response to other submissions Committee and Policies Structure See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Plans Chedworth 1171.007 Support in 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans - amend introductory

Properties Ltd part sentence as set out in submission by deleting the work "must" and replacing with 'shall'; and to incorporate the concept of 'general The introductory paragraph to Rule 3.3 I has been amended so as to not be in conflict with the RMA and that consent applications accordance'. Accept in “consider” the relevant objectives and policies Part Tainui Group 913.008 Support in Amend the introduction for 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Holdings Ltd part by deleting the word 'must' and replace with 'shall' and add the word 'general' as set out in the submission. William Cornelis FS160.001 Oppose Reject Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Reject Further submissions 160.001 and 161.001 are not related to the matters contained in 913.008. Heather Montgomerie - New Zealand FS270.018 Oppose Reject FS270.018 is rejected as 913.008 has been accepted in part. Transport Agency PRS Planning 929.012 Oppose Amend the introductory paragraph to Rule 3.3 (Objectives and Policies, Accept The introductory paragraph to Rule 3.3 is amended so as to not be in conflict with the RMA and that consent applications “consider” Services Limited Structure Plans) to be consistent with that used in Rule 2.2 (as sought to the relevant objectives and policies be amended by this submission). This issue has been submitted on in other chapters of the Plan, for example chapter 2 (Strategic Framework). In line with the approach taken there, it is accepted that the introduction paragraph set a higher threshold than s104D of the RMA, 1991 and it is appropriate to amend the rule so that all consents within a structure plan area ‘consider where relevant’ the objectives and policies of the Plan

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. McCracken 1206.013 Oppose That the introductory sentence to Rule 3.3 is amended as follows: “Any Accept in Amendments to the wording of the paragraph limiting the consideration of the objectives and policies to discretionary and Surveys Limited discretionary or non‐complying activity should not be contrary to the Part non‐complying activities only is not supported as this would exclude controlled or restricted discretionary consents. objectives and policies below”. Property Council 938.011 Oppose Amend 3.3 (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) so that “Any Accept in The introductory paragraph to Rule 3.3 is amended so as to not be in conflict with the RMA and that consent applications “consider” New Zealand discretionary or non-complying activity should not be contrary to the Part the relevant objectives and policies objectives and policies below”. This issue has been submitted on in other chapters of the Plan, for example Chapter 2 (Strategic Framework). In line with the approach taken there, it is accepted that the introduction paragraph set a higher threshold than s104D of the RMA, 1991 and it is appropriate to amend the rule so that all consents within a structure plan area ‘consider where relevant’ the objectives and policies of the Plan

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support Reject FS2.012 is not related to the matters contained in 913.011.

Peter John FS242.001 Support Findlay et al Accept in FS242.001 and FS277.001 are accepted in part as 938.011 is accepted in part. (Baruchel Part Developments

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 6 of 63

Ltd) Peter John FS277.001 Support Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Waikato District 1211.006 Support in Include new objective and policy framework to support the Reject An additional set of objectives and policies to support the establishment of business and industrial activities is considered to be an Council part establishment of business and industrial activities and development unnecessary duplication of objectives and policies elsewhere in the Plan. within structure plan areas that is also consistent with the industrial land allocation and the hierarchy of major commercial centres for The establishment of a centres hierarchy is an important theme and approach advocated by the Plan. Chapters 2 and 6 set the policy Hamilton City provided for in the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. framework for this and in particular objective 2.2.4 and related policies promote the hierarchy of major commercial centres including the land allocation for industrial activity, consistent with the provisions of the PRPS. Whilst a Structure Plan is not a full zoning plan, it does provide overall direction and the expectation is that any proposal for a new business or industrial node within an existing or proposed structure plan will need to be aligned with the policy framework of the Plan and with documents such as HUGS, Future Proof and the PRPS. Objective 3.3.1 and Policies a-d Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Waikato Regional 714.006 3.3.1 Support Retain the Objectives and Policies under 3.3.1 Structure Plans Accept in This submission supports 3.3.1 and associated policies. It is only accepted in part as the provisions that the submission seeks to retain Council Objective Part have been amended in response to other submissions and Policies See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Waikato-Tainui 771.011 Support Support the Structure Planning Objective 3.3.1 “Optimised, long-term, Accept This submission supports 3.3.1 and is accepted because there are no other submissions seeking amendments to the objective. Te Kauhanganui positive, environmental, economic social and cultural effects of Inc Greenfield development”. Deborah June 282.021 Support in Objective 3-3-1 to be amended to provide for any positive effect or Reject The objective (3.3.1) has been formulated with the purpose of ensuring that cumulatively, development is carried out in a sustainable, Fisher part adverse effects. responsible manner. Both the objective and policies have been developed to ensure adverse effects are avoided where possible. The Church of FS180.003 Oppose Accept FS180.003 is accepted as submission 282.021 has been rejected. Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust Board New Zealand 924.011 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1a to remove the word ‘general’ so that it reads 'in Reject A structure plan does not represent a ‘blueprint’ for an area and is intended to guide and illustrate a possible future development Transport Agency part accordance with the relevant structure plan'. This should apply pattern. The very nature of structure planning requires that there is a degree of flexibility built into the various elements and throughout the Plan. provisions. The use of the phrase ‘in general accordance’ is considered to be the correct approach acknowledging the uncertainty that comes with the implementation of longer term planning proposals. Tainui Group FS196.014 Holdings Limited Property Council FS249.004 Oppose Accept Further submissions 196.014, 249.004 and 272.029 are accepted as submission 924.011 is rejected. New Zealand The Adare FS272.029 Company Ltd Mark Thomson 709.001 Oppose Delete Policy 3.3.1b (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans - housing Reject This submission is rejected because the deletion of these policies will reduce the effectiveness of the plan in terms of achieving Mitchell densities) compliance with PRPS.

As reflected in the s42A reports the Plan has been drafted in response to the density targets of the Future Proof sub-regional growth management strategy and the PRPS. The strategic approach is a blend of compact settlement and concentrated growth. The Plan supports the fundamental shift in growth management from focusing largely on accommodating low-density suburban residential development to supporting a more compact urban form. It recognises the benefits of a compact urban environment.

The PRPS sets out dwelling targets that will be achieved through management of lot sizes in existing residential areas and yield limits in structure plan areas. This objective and its policies set the manner in which residential densities targets are to be achieved and also set out the policy framework of controlling density to reinforce a compact and sustainable city. Tainui Group 913.009 Support in Retain Structure 3.3.1 Objective and Policies with amendments to Accept in This submission is accepted in part as other submitters have also sought amendments to Policy 3.3.1b and collectively amendments Holdings Ltd part recognise that housing density targets will be achieved over time and Part have been made. will exclude roads and open space zoned land. Include an explanation of achieving higher densities (as set out in the submission). See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 7 of 63

Make amendments to policy for interim land use to allow low density The amendments will assist in aligning the policy framework with the RPS and will improve the internal consistency, understanding and residential development and to focus on future land use patterns rather administration of the Plan. than the long term vision. William Cornelis FS160.001 Oppose Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Reject Further submissions 160.001 and 161.001 are not related to the matters contained in 913.009. Heather Montgomerie - The Adare FS272.015 Support Accept in FS272.015 is accepted in part as 913.009 is accepted in part. Company Ltd Part PRS Planning 929.013 Oppose 3.3.1Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans: Services Limited Amend Policy 3.3.1bi. to reflect the intention that densities per hectare are to be achieved exclusive of roads by rewording (new text in brackets) as follows: These submissions are accepted in part as other submitters have also sought amendments to Policy 3.3.1b and collectively amendments have been accepted (see Tracked Changes for Chapter 3). '16 dwellings per hectare (excluding land to be vested as roads and Accept in

reserve) for greenfield development.' part The amendments will assist in aligning the policy framework with the RPS and will improve the internal consistency, understanding and Delete Policy 3.3.1b ii) in its entirety. administration of the Plan. Property Council 938.012 Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.1b to read: “Housing densities in greenfield locations New Zealand should achieve over time a gross density excluding roads of 16 dwellings per hectare” Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support Reject FS2.012 is not related to the matters contained in 938.

Peter John FS242.001 Support Findlay et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Accept in FS242.001 and FS277.001 are accepted in part as 938.012 is accepted in part. Peter John FS277.001 Support Part Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Rotokauri 1015.001 Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.1b to recognise average gross density targets can be Developments achieved over time: Ltd 'Housing densities in greenfield locations should achieve over time an average gross density target, excluding roads and Open Space zoned land of 16 dwellings per hectare.' Hounsell 1104.005 Oppose 3.3.1 (b) Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Reword 3.3.1 (b) to Holdings Ltd include the word 'progressively' so that the first line reads "Housing densities should progressively achieve." Barry Harris 1146.003 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1b i., as set out in the submission, to reflect the These submissions are accepted in part as other submitters have also sought amendments to Policy 3.3.1b and collectively (Hamilton City part intention that densities are an overall target for the Structure Plan Area amendments have been accepted (see Tracked changes for Chapter 3). Accept in Council) as opposed to an absolute requirement for every individual Part development. The amendments will assist in aligning the policy framework with the RPS and will improve the internal consistency, understanding and Delete policy 3.3.1b ii. administration of the Plan Hamilton JV 1170.005 Oppose 3.3.1 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Investment Amend Policy 3.3.1bas set out in submission by rewording the first Company Ltd sentence "Housing densities should progressively achieve:" to ensure density is expressed as an intention to be met progressively and through a range of policy measures. Chedworth 1171.008 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1 b and the Explanation to that policy (Structure Plans Properties Ltd part - Housing densities) as set out in submission to delete the words 'should achieve' and add the words 'shall seek to achieve over time the

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 8 of 63

following average gross density targets excluding roads and Open Space zoned land', and add explanatory text as set out in the submission. McCracken 1206.014 Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.1b to read: Surveys Limited “Housing densities in greenfield locations should achieve over time a gross density excluding roads of 16 dwellings per hectare” The Adare 482.004 Oppose Remove Policy 3.3.1(b) (Structure Plans - Housing densities) as it relates Company Ltd to greenfield development of the Peacocke area and rely on the Master Plan exercise and minimum net site area subdivision provisions for the Peacocke Character Areas to determine the appropriate density.

Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect. ANG & SL Clarke 951.006 Oppose Exclude the Large Lot Residential Zone from Policy 3.3.1b (Objectives Accept The submission supports 3.3 and is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: and Policies - Structure Plans - housing density)  Retention of 3.3.1 Objective is accepted Amendments to the policies; an increase in the required density from 16 to 18 dwellings per hectare for greenfield development; and the amendments to 3.3.1c are rejected because the amendments will reduce the effectiveness of the plan in terms of achieving compliance with Future Proof, HUGS and the PRPS. Waikato District 1211.007 Support in Retain 3.3.1 Objective and Policies with amendments to: remove Accept in The submission supports 3.3 and is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Council part reference to the word 'general' in both 3.3.1 and elsewhere in the part  Retention of 3.3.1 Objective is accepted district plan; Amendments to the policies; an increase the required density from 16 to 18 dwellings per hectare for greenfield development; and the to increase the required density from 16 to 18 dwellings per hectare for amendments to 3.3.1c are rejected because the amendments will reduce the effectiveness of the plan in terms of achieving compliance greenfield development; with Future Proof, HUGS and the PRPS. to remove reference to development providing population density to support passenger transport and amend to support integrated and efficient passenger transport. Objective 3.3.2 and Policies a-e Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Population 1273.004 3.3.2 Support Retain and adopt the Objectives and Policies under 3.3.2 Structure Plans Accept in This submission supports 3.3.2 and is accepted in part as amendments to the policies have been made in response to other submissions Health, Waikato Objective as notified. Part See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 DHB and Policies Waikato District 1211.008 Support in 3.3.2 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans - Clarify at what stage and Reject The clarification sought by the submitter is already provided for by the explanation text under objective 3.3.2. Social infrastructure Council part by whom social infrastructure will be provided. (including libraries, pools and community halls) programmes are captured in both the Long Term and Annual Plans. Where development occurs outside of this programme, it is anticipated that the developer will bear the initial cost of infrastructure provision. The recovery of this cost is dependent on the specifics of each agreement entered into with Council, which may differ from project to project. Whilst there are a number of variables at play, delivery is ultimately dependent on the needs of an established resident community who will use the facilities on a day to day basis. Waikato Regional 714.007 Support in Retain Objective 3.3.2 under Structure Plans with amendment to Policy Accept in The submission support 3.3.2. It is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Council part 3.3.2c to ensure connection of transport modes, connectivity of Part  The retention of objective 3.3.2 is accepted industrial areas to the transport network, integration of transport  The amendment of policy 3.3.2c has been rejected. networks over district boundaries and to ensure development does not hinder future infrastructure requirements. The addition of a number of policies relating to the transportation network is considered an unnecessary duplication of objectives and policies elsewhere in the Plan. Future Proof FS181.008 Support Accept in Implementation Part Committee FS181.008 and FS270.011 are accepted in part as 714.007 is accepted in part. New Zealand FS270.011 Support Accept in Transport Part Agency New Zealand 924.012 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2(a) (Structure Plans) and associated Explanation to Accept in This submission supports 3.3.2. The proposed amendments will Transport Agency part ensure they apply to a broader range of infrastructure than that for Part improve the: which Council is responsible by making amendments as set out in the  Internal consistency of the Plan submission.  Clarity of the Plan for users See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 9 of 63

Reference to effects on Council’s planned infrastructure is unnecessary, and a broadening of the scope of the policy will assist in the implementation of objective 3.3.2. Fonterra Co- 1200.009 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2a to delete reference to ensuring the servicing of the Reject The submission points seek amendments that would reduce consistency of the Plan with the PRPS in terms of the enhancement of the operative Group part land does not compromise the efficiency and sustainability of Council’s safe and efficient functioning of existing or planned infrastructure. Whilst ‘efficiency’ and ‘sustainability’ are not defined by the Plan, Ltd planned infrastructure. they reinforce the approach that the provision of infrastructure needs to be coordinated and delivered in a sustainable manner. The proposed amendments would not change the general approach that developers are responsible for mitigating effects generated by their development. Future Proof FS181.004 Oppose Accept FS181.004 is accepted as submission 1200.009 is rejected. Implementation Committee The Adare FS272.033 Support Reject FS272.033 is rejected 1200.009 has been rejected. Company Ltd Chedworth 1171.009 Support in 3.3.2 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans) - Accept in The submissions support 3.3.2. They have only been accepted in part as other submissions sought amendments to the provisions that Properties Ltd part Amend Policies 3.3.2a and 3.3.2e as set out in the submission; Delete part this submission relates to. Policy 3.3.2d to ensure consistency with the Proposed Regional Policy Statement. The proposed amendments will improve the: Tainui Group 913.010 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2a and delete Policy 3.3.2d to regarding infrastructure Accept in  Consistency of the Plan with the PRPS in terms of the enhancement of the safe and efficient functioning of existing or planned Holdings Ltd part requirements for development. Amend Policy 3.3.2e so that the staging Part infrastructure. and sequencing of development only has to be in general accordance  Internal consistency and clarity of the Plan for users with staging indicated on the relevant structure plan. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 University of FS47.002 Oppose Reject FS47.002 is rejected as 913.010 is accepted in part. Waikato William Cornelis FS160.001 Oppose Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Reject FS160.001 and 161.001 do not relate to the matters in 913.010. Heather Montgomerie - The Adare FS272.016 Support Accept in FS272.016 is accepted in part as 913.010 has been accepted in part. Company Ltd part ANG & SL Clarke 951.006 Oppose Add new objectives and policies to 3.3.2 for Large Lot Residential and Reject The provision of on-site infrastructure solutions is a detail issue that is not dealt with or considered by chapter 3. Objectives and Future Urban zoned areas where reticulated infrastructure is not Policies for these zones are provided in chapters 4 and 14 of the Plan. A structure plan only provides overall guidance on the provision available as the current objectives and policies are more relevant to of infrastructure. The detailed design of reticulation solutions is discussed and managed through the resource consenting process. urban development with reticulated services. Objective 3.3.3 and Policies a and b Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Population 1273.005 3.3.3 Support Retain and adopt Objectives and Policies under 3.3.3 Structure Plans as Health, Waikato Objective notified. DHB and Policies

Waikato Regional 714.008 Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 3.3.3 Structure Plans with Council part amendments to include the safeguarding and enhancement of freshwater bodies and additions to the list of matters under policy 3.3.3b for Integrated Catchment Management Plans. Accept in This submission supports 3.3.3 and is accepted in part as amendments have been made in response to other submissions. part See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 PRS Planning 929.015 Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.3b: (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) to Services Limited clearly identify when Integrated Catchment Management Plans are required. Robert Gordon 1268.001 Support in Retain Structure Plans 3.3.3 Objective and Policies with amendments to Bell part require Integrated Catchment Management Plans before Policies and Rules are set. Objective 3.3.4 and Policies a-g Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Population 1273.006 3.3.4 Support Retain and adopt Objectives and Policies under 3.3.4 Structure Plans as Accept in This submission supports 3.3.4 and is accepted in part as amendments have been made in response to other submissions Health, Waikato Objective notified. part See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 10 of 63

DHB and Policies Waikato Regional 714.009 Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 3.3.4 Structure Plans with Accept in The submission supports 3.3.4. It is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Council part amendments, as set out in the submission, to include the improvement part  The retention of objective 3.3.4 is accepted of safety of the transportation network under policy 3.3.4g and to  The amendment to 3.3.4f is rejected as it is considered that the relief sought is inconsistent with the objectives of the Plan. clarify that adverse effects from building new transport infrastructure  The amendment to 3.3.4g is accepted as the provision of safe transportation networks is supported by the Plan need to be avoided, as well as minimised in 3.3.4f. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 New Zealand FS270.012 Support Accept in FS270.012 is accepted in part as 714.009 has been accepted in part. Transport part Agency New Zealand 924.013 Support in Amend Objective 3.3.4 by deleting the word "Council". Accept in The submission supports 3.3.4. It is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Transport Agency part part  The amendment of Objective 3.3.4 is accepted as this will improve the internal consistency of the Plan. Amend Policy 3.3.4a: as set out in the submission to also refer to the  The amendments to policies 3.3.4a, 3.3.4b are rejected. In terms of this matter, Integrated Transport Assessments (ITA) are defined range of considerations included in a ‘Broad Integrated carried out to determine the impact of a specific development on the transportation network and are a factor in assessing Transport Assessment’ as set out in the definitions in Part 2. The whether a consent should be granted or not. In the context of chapter 3, which is concerned with the overall network Explanation will also require amending to reflect this requested change. efficiency, it is considered unnecessary for the policies to reference ITA’s. However, it is considered that there is merit in broadening the explanation text as this will improve the integration, internal consistency and cross referencing within the Plan. Amend Policy 3.3.4b: to also refer to the defined range of  The amendment to the associated explanation text is accepted in part as this will improve the cross referencing within the considerations included in a ‘Broad Integrated Transport Assessment’ as Plan. set out in the definitions in Part 2. The Explanation will also require  The amendment of policy 3.3.4b is rejected as this is an unnecessary duplication of the provisions elsewhere in the Plan. amending to reflect this requested change.

Amend this policy as requested to promote clarity and ensure that the policy is consistent with the subsequent Explanation.

Insert a new policy as set out in the submission, to ensure that financial impacts are minimised alongside environmental considerations. PRS Planning 929.016 Oppose 3.3.4 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans) Services Limited The deletion of policies 3.3.4a and 3.3.4b is rejected. In terms of this matter, Integrated Transport Assessments (ITA) are carried out to That Policies 3.3.4a and 3.3.4b be deleted determine the impact of a specific development on the transportation network and are a factor in assessing whether a consent should Chedworth 1171.010 Oppose Delete policy 3.3.4b (Policy - Structure Plans). Reject be granted or not. In the context of chapter 3, which is concerned with the overall network efficiency, it is considered unnecessary for Properties Ltd the policies to reference ITA’s. However, it is considered that there is merit in broadening the explanation text as this will improve the integration, internal consistency and cross referencing within the Plan. Tainui Group 913.011 Oppose Delete Policy 3.3.4b Holdings Ltd William Cornelis FS160.001 Oppose Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Reject FS 160.001 and 161.001 are not related to the matters contained in 913.011. Heather Montgomerie - The Adare FS272.017 Support Reject FS272.017 is rejected as 1171.010 has been rejected. Company Ltd

Objective 3.3.5 and Policies a and b Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Deborah June 282.022 3.3.5 Oppose Policies 3.3.5a) and b) to be amended to "avoid" adverse effects Reject The submission seeks amendments that would reduce the effectiveness of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and Fisher Objective policies. and Policies Policy 3.3.5a relates to methods that can be used to manage reverse sensitivity along zone boundaries and it is applicable to both structures and activities. In the context of chapter 3, the policy is considered to be correctly worded. Further detail provisions to ensure that reverse sensitivity is properly managed, are provided in other chapters through the Plan.

The Church of FS180.004 Oppose Accept FS180.004 is accepted as 282.022 has been rejected. Jesus Christ of Latter Day

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 11 of 63

Saints Trust Board Fonterra Co- 1200.010 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.5b by adding 'and regionally significant industry' Reject The policy is considered to be correctly worded and the proposed amendment is too narrowly focused on industrial activity. operative Group part Ltd New Zealand 924.014 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.5b by deleting the word 'Sensitive' so that it reads as Reject The submission seeks amendments that would reduce the effectiveness of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and Transport Agency part follows: "Land uses shall avoid effects on and from regionally significant policies in terms of managing the adverse effects that buildings and activities can have on each other. infrastructure". Tainui Group FS196.017 Oppose Holdings Limited Accept FS196.017 and FS249.028 are accepted as 924.014 has been rejected. Property Council FS249.028 Oppose New Zealand Transpower New 1083.006 Support in 3.3.5 Objective and Policies - Accept in The submission supports 3.3.5. It is accepted in part as that part of the submission relating to: Zealand Ltd part Part  The amendment to 3.3.5b is accepted Amend 3.3.5b by inserting the word 'adverse' as set out in the  The addition of a new policy 3.3.5c is accepted in part. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 submission: 'Sensitive land uses shall avoid adverse effects on and from regionally The amendments will assist in the clarity, understanding and administration of the Plan significant infrastructure'. The addition of a new policy is supported (albeit with minor changes to the wording for clarity only) as this would help ensure that Insert a new Policy 3.3.5c development within a structure plan area is integrated with existing and planned regionally significant infrastructure. 'Manage subdivision, use and development to avoid adverse effects on the safe, efficient and effective operation and use of existing or planned infrastructure'.

Adopt any other such relief, including additions, deletions or consequential amendments necessary as a result of the matters raised in these submissions, as necessary to give effect to this submission. New Zealand FS270.024 Support Accept in FS270.024 is accepted in part as submission 1083.006 has been accepted in part. Transport part Agency Barry Harris 1146.004 Support in 3.3.5 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Amend the last paragraph Accept The minor amendments are necessary and will assist in the clarity, understanding and administration of the Plan. (Hamilton City part of the explanation as set out in the submission to include reference to Council) 'other sensitive' land uses. Objective 3.3.6 and Policies a-d Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Deborah June 282.023 3.3.6 Support in Add policy to recognise "adjoining land uses" Accept in As this is specifically mentioned within Objective 3.3.6 and the associated explanation text, the submission is accepted but rather than Fisher Objective part Part the addition of a new policy as proposed by the submitter, an amendment to the wording of 3.3.6d has been made to deal with the and Policies concerns raised.

Waikato Regional 714.010 Support in a) Amend Policy 3.3.6a so that loss of SNAs is avoided, and Council part opportunities for restoration and enhancement of indigenous vegetation are sought wherever possible.

It is considered that the existing policy wording achieves the stated objective whilst ensuring there is a degree of flexibility. The b) Amend Policy 3.3.6c to delete the words 'where practicable'. concerns raised by the submitter are therefore unfounded. On this basis, the amendments to both policies are not supported.

c) Add a new policy 3.3.6e that recognises the importance of, and Whilst WRC sought additional new policies to 3.3.6, it is considered that the intent of the submission and the concerns raised, are provides for, well connected and ecologically functioning natural Reject managed in other chapters of the Plan, namely, chapter 21 regarding the River and Gully system and chapter 25 (25.13, Three Waters) systems, based around the core ecological framework of the Waikato regarding appropriate policies addressing stormwater. The introduction of two new policies is therefore considered an unnecessary River and gully system. duplication.

d) Add a policy on biodiversity restoration and enhancement through structure plans as follows: “Develop constructed wetlands and other green infrastructure in new growth areas to deal with urban stormwater issues and to provide for increased habitat and ecosystems.” Hounsell 1104.006 Oppose 3.3.6(b) Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Reword Policy 3.3.6(b) Holdings Ltd to include the wording "..Retains features of the landscape identified on Accept The minor amendments are necessary and will assist in the clarity, understanding and administration of the Plan structure plans".

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 12 of 63

Porter Properties 1164.005 Oppose Amend Policy 3.3.6b in Objective and Policies for Structure Plans to Ltd clarify "identified features" will be identified on structure plans Hamilton JV 1170.006 Oppose 3.3.6 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans Investment Amend Policy 3.3.6b) by rewording as set out in submission to insert Company Ltd text "retain features of the landscape identified on structure plans". Lynette Joyce 1050.003 Support in 3.3.6 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans - Insert an additional policy Williams part statement in regard to the recognition and protection of heritage features. The addition of a policy statement in regard to the recognition and protection of heritage features is considered an unnecessary Reject Niall Baker 1158.003 Support in 3.3.6 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Insert an additional policy duplication of policies identified elsewhere in the Plan. part statement in regard to the recognition and protection of heritage features. Objective 3.3.7 and Policies a-c Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision New Zealand 924.015 Support Retain 3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans as notified. Accept in This submission supports 3.3.7 objective and policies. It is only accepted in part as the provisions that the submission supports have Transport Agency part been amended in response to other submissions See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. PRS Planning 929.019 Oppose Amend 3.3.7 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans) to clarify the status Accept An additional reference to the Hamilton City Open Space Plan is considered beneficial and will assist in the clarity and understanding of Services Limited of the referenced Open Space Plan/Strategy. If this is unavailable then the Plan. the Policy should be deleted or replaced with one that references the future reserves identified on the relevant structure plan. Waikato Regional 714.011 3.3.7 Support in 3.3.7 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans). Amend Policy 3.3.7b iv. by The submission points seek amendments that would reduce the effectiveness of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and Council Objective part deleting the words 'Significant Natural Areas' and replacing with the policies. and Policies words: "areas where recreation use is compatible with conservation values". Policy 3.3.7b is not an absolute requirement and will not imply the damage to or that cultural or natural heritage values would be Lynette Joyce 1050.004 Oppose 3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Policy 3.3.7b - Review this sacrificed to the advantage of other requirements. It only alludes to a certain principles that should be considered at the structure plan level. Williams section to ensure cultural heritage values are not to be sacrificed to Reject

open space requirements. A structure plan only provides the broad direction and overarching proposals with regard to a number of issues including the Niall Baker 1158.004 Oppose Review section 3.3.7 Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans - to ensure identification and provision of community facilities and areas with natural and built heritage value that can be used to support local cultural heritage values are not to be sacrificed to open space identity, changes to more intensive forms of development and the land required for active or passive recreation and public access to requirements. water. The co-location of recreational activities with cultural and heritage sites is something that should only be considered. Before a final decision is made a number factors would need to be evaluated and considered, such as the potential for this to damage or destroy archaeological sites. Seen against the backdrop of chapter 3, it is considered that the policy is appropriately worded. Submissions regarding Shall vs. Should Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision PRS Planning 929.014 3.3.2 Oppose That the word "shall" in Policies 3.3.2a, 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c, 3.3.2e (Structure Services Limited Objectives Plans) be replaced with the word "should". Waikato 698.003 and Policies Support in 3.3.2 Objectives and Policies - The deletion of the word ‘shall’ provides for better objectives and policies for the plans framework and workability.

Chamber of part Amend Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c and 3.3.2e by deleting the word 'shall' and Accept in These submissions are accepted in part and the changes to the policies reflect the consistent approach taken through this submission Commerce replacing with 'must have regard to'. part process

McCracken 1206.015 Oppose 3.3.2 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Replace reference to See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Surveys Limited 'shall' with 'should' in Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c and 3.3.2e. Property Council 938.013 Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c, and 3.3.2e by replacing the word 'shall' New Zealand with 'should'. Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support

Peter John FS242.001 Support Findlay et al Reject FS2.012 and FS242.001 are not related to the matters contained in 938.013 (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS242.012 Support Accept in FS242.012 is accepted in part as 938.013 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Baruchel

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 13 of 63

Developments Ltd) Peter John FS277.001 Support Reject FS277.001 is not related to the matters contained in 938.013 Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John FS277.012 Support Accept in FS277.012 is accepted in part as 938.013 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) McCracken 1206.016 3.3.4 Oppose 3.3.4 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Replace reference to Surveys Limited Objectives 'shall' with 'should' in Policies 3.3.4a, 3.3.4b, 3.3.4c, 3.3.4e, 3.3.4f, The deletion of the word ‘shall’ provides for better objectives and policies for the plans framework and workability. and Policies 3.3.4g

PRS Planning 929.016 Oppose 3.3.4 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans) These submissions are accepted in part and the changes to the policies reflect the consistent approach taken through this submission Accept in Services Limited process. part That the word "shall" in Policies 3.3.4c, 3.3.4d, 3.3.4e, 3.3.4f, and 3.3.4g are replaced with the word "should". See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Property Council 938.014 Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.4a to 3.3.4c and 3.3.4e, to 3.3.4g by replacing the New Zealand word “shall” with “should”. Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support

Peter John FS242.001 Support Findlay et al Reject FS2.012 and FS242.001 are not related to the matters contained in 938.014 (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS242.013 Support Accept in FS242.013 is accepted in part as 938.014 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS277.001 Support Reject FS277.001 is not related to the matters contained in 938.014 Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John FS277.013 Support Accept in FS277.013 is accepted in part as 938.014 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) McCracken 1206.017 3.3.5 Oppose 3.3.5 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Replace reference to Surveys Limited objectives “shall” with “should” in Policies 3.3.5a and 3.3.5b. and Policies The deletion of the word ‘shall’ provides for better objectives and policies for the plans framework and workability.

PRS Planning 929.017 Oppose 3.3.5 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans): Accept in These submissions are accepted in part and the changes to the policies reflect the consistent approach taken through this submission Services Limited That the word "shall" in Policies3.3.5a, 3.3.5b be replaced with the word part process "should". See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Property Council 938.015 Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.5a and 3.3.5b by replacing the word “shall” with New Zealand “should”. Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support

Peter John FS242.001 Support Reject FS2.012 and FS242.001 are not related to the matters contained in 938.015. Findlay et al (Baruchel

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 14 of 63

Developments Ltd) Peter John FS242.014 Support Accept in FS242.014 is accepted in part as 938.015 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al Ltd) part Peter John FS277.001 Support Reject FS277.001 is not related to the matters contained in 938.015. Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John FS277.014 Support Accept in FS277.014 is accepted in part as 938.015 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) McCracken 1206.018 3.3.6 Oppose 3.3.6 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans - Replace reference to Surveys Limited Objectives “shall” with “should” in Policies 3.3.6a, 3.3.6b, 3.3.6c, and 3.3.6d. The deletion of the word ‘shall’ provides for better objectives and policies for the plans framework and workability. and Policies PRS Planning 929.018 Oppose 3.3.6 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans): That the word 'shall' in Accept in These submissions are accepted in part and the changes to the policies reflect the consistent approach taken through this submission Services Limited Policies 3.3.6a, 3.3.6b, 3.3.6c, 3.3.6d be replaced with the word 'should'. part process Property Council 938.016 Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.6a to 3.3.6d by replacing the word “shall” with See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. New Zealand “should”. Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support

Peter John FS242.001 Support Findlay et al Reject FS2.012 and FS242.001 are not related to the matters contained in 938.016 (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS242.015 Support Accept in FS242.015 is accepted in part as 938.016 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS277.001 Support Reject FS277.001 is not related to the matters contained in 938.016 Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John FS277.015 Support Accept in FS277.015 is accepted in part as 938.016 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) McCracken 1206.019 3.3.7 Oppose 3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans - Replace reference to The deletion of the word ‘shall’ provides for better objectives and policies for the plans framework and workability. Surveys Limited Objective “shall” with “should” in Policies 3.3.7a and 3.3.7b. Accept in and Policies part These submissions are accepted in part and the changes to the policies reflect the consistent approach taken through this submission Property Council 938.017 Oppose Amend Policies 3.3.7a and 3.3.7b by replacing the word “shall” with process. New Zealand “should”. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Andrew Yeoman FS2.012 Support Reject FS2.012 is not related to the matters contained in 938.017.

Peter John FS242.001 Support Reject FS242.001 is not related to the matters contained in 938.017. Findlay et al (Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS242.016 Support Accept in FS242.016 is accepted in part as 938.017 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 15 of 63

(Baruchel Developments Ltd) Peter John FS277.001 Support Reject FS277.001 is not related to the matters contained in 938.017. Findlay et al (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Peter John FS277.016 Support Accept in FS277.016 is accepted in part as 938.017 has been accepted in part. Findlay et al part (Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay & Associates Ltd) Submissions regarding Safety Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Starship Trauma 182.009 3.2 Support in Submitter seeks an additional Key Principle in Section 3.2 (Principles for Service Principles part Structure Plans) as follows: "Safety: The layout of any future residential Whilst the concerns are noted, it is not appropriate to reference child safety within chapter 3 dealing with structure planning issues. development considers the physical safety of children. This design will Structure planning is a valuable way to achieve integrated management of the effects of developing large land areas. It is a way of include vehicular access in relation to the dwelling and any adjacent addressing the sustainable management of natural physical resources, particularly in an urban context. Structure Plans provide an garden area to minimise the risk of injury/fatality from causes such as important tool for Council in helping to identify appropriate services, infrastructure, open space, densities, residential and business child driveway run overs". areas, significant cultural, natural and historic or heritage features and urban design needs for a particular area or locality. Waikato Child 1003.001 Support in Amend 3.2 regarding Structure Plan Principles to insert a new principle Reject and Youth part regarding the design of development to maximise child safety. Ensuring the safety of the most vulnerable members of the community is most effectively done through a number of other mechanisms Mortality Review and community organizations. At a more detailed level, the Plan identifies ‘safety’ as one of the qualities and attributes important in a Group residential environment. For example Policy 4.1.5b) which is applicable to all residential zones, focuses specifically on the matters to ensure an enjoyable living environment, which includes the safety of the area. Apart from the proposed amendment to policy 3.3.1c Waikato Child 1003.002 3.3.1 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1c Structure Plans with amendments to include the and Youth Objective part maximisation of Child Safety and amend the associated explanation to (submission 182.004) the concerns raised are detailed in nature and cannot be managed through the objectives and policies of chapter 3. Mortality Review and Policies highlight that density targets will not compromise safety requirements. Group Starship Trauma 182.004 Support in Amend policy 3.3.1c to ensure passenger transport is not only efficient Accept This submission seeks amendments that would improve the effectiveness of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and Service part by safe by inserting the word 'safe' into the policy text. policies with regard to passenger transport.

Waikato Child 1003.004 3.3.4 Support in Amend Policy 3.3.4g as set out in the submission, to ensure that arterial and Youth Objective part routes do not sever safe access between residential and recreational Mortality Review and Policies spaces. Group Waikato Child 1003.006 3.3.5 Support in 3.3.5 Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans: and Youth Objective part Amend Policy 3.3.5a by adding a second sentence: "Any increased risk Mortality Review and Policies to safety that may result from these adjacent activities should be Group considered and mitigated against". Waikato Child 1003.018 3.5 Support in Section 3.5 (Rototuna) - and Youth Rototuna part Amend 3.5 b) and 3.5 c) as per submission to explicitly incorporate the Mortality Review aspect of safety into the plan. Matters relating to design and layout of future residential or development areas including the design of arterial routes to consider and Group Reject maximise the physical safety of children is a detailed design matter that cannot be managed through the objectives and policies of Waikato Child 1003.019 Support in 3.5 - Rototuna Chapter 3. and Youth part Amend 3.5 b) and 3.5 c) to explicitly incorporate the aspect of safety Mortality Review into the plan, as set out in submission. Group Waikato Child 1003.020 3.5.1 Support in 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies - and Youth Objectives part Add a new policy to 3.5.1.4 (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) as Mortality Review and Policies follows: Group '3.5.1.4d Provide layout that minimises risk to children (such as slow speed run overs).' Waikato Child 1003.021 3.6.1 Support in Add a new sentence to the end of first paragraph under 3.6.1 and Youth Objectives part “subdivision for residential purposes should give full consideration to

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 16 of 63

Mortality Review and Policies safety such as minimizing risk of driveway run over”. Group Waikato Child 1003.022 3.6.2.2 Support in 3.6.2.2 Residential - Rotokauri. and Youth Residential part Mortality Review Amend 3.6.2.2a) to read: Group "residential development is indicated in four distinct residential environments where the layout will maximise safety to all householders while engendering a sense of community"

Amend 3.6.2.2.a)i. by inserting the words 'and safe' Waikato Child 1003.008 3.4 Support in Amend 3.4 c) Concentration, to add at the end of the sentence: "that Reject The amendments sought are unnecessary as the matters are: and Youth Peacocke part considers all aspects of child safety".  Inherent in the provisions regarding good urban design and accessibility Mortality Review  Already addressed through other provisions in the Plan that focus on site specific proposals (e.g. Chapter 23 Subdivision, Chapter 4 Group Amend 3.4 by adding an additional key principle as follows: Residential Zone, Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, Chapter 25.14 Transportation, Chapter 25.15 Urban Design) Safety: The layout of any future residential development considers the  Not directly relevant to the matters in the provision which they seek to amend physical safety of children. This design will include vehicular access in relation to the dwelling and any adjacent garden area to minimise the risk of injury/fatality, such as through slow driveway run over. Starship Trauma 182.007 3.4 Vision Support in Amend the first paragraph of 3.4 to read as follows "The vision for the Service part Peacocke area is that it will become a high quality and safe urban environment that is based on urban design best practice, social well- being, and environmental responsibility." Waikato Child 1003.010 3.4 Vision Support in Amend 3.4 to include reference to "safe" urban environment. and Youth part Mortality Review Group The amendments sought are unnecessary as the matters are:  Inherent in the provisions regarding good urban design and accessibility Starship Trauma 182.005 3.4.2.1 Support in Amend 3.4.2.1 i) i, and j) by inserting references to child safety and safe Reject Service Community part pedestrian access principles into the criteria for the location of  Already addressed through other provisions in the Plan that focus on site specific proposals (e.g. Chapter 23 Subdivision, Chapter 4 and neighbourhood parks within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area. Residential Zone, Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, Chapter 25.14 Transportation, Chapter 25.15 Urban Design) Recreation Facilities Waikato Child 1003.012 3.4.2.1 Support in Amend 3.4.2.1b), d), and j) to ensure consideration of the need for and Youth Community part pedestrian safety. Mortality Review and Group Recreation Facilities Waikato Child 1003.013 3.4.2.2 Support in Amend 3.4.2.2 b) to ensure the safety of children. and Youth Neighbourh part Mortality Review oods Group Starship Trauma 182.011 3.4.3 Support in Amend 3.4.3e) to include "The designated arterial routes should not Service Transport part sever safe access to public recreational spaces." The amendments sought are unnecessary as the matters are: Network  Inherent in the provisions regarding good urban design and accessibility  Already addressed through other provisions in the Plan that focus on site specific proposals (e.g. Chapter 23 Subdivision, Chapter 4 Reject Waikato Child 1003.014 3.4.3 Support in Amend 3.4.3 e) to ensure arterial routes do not sever safe access to Residential Zone, Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, Chapter 25.14 Transportation, Chapter 25.15 Urban Design) and Youth Transport part public recreational space.  Would be determined as part of the Southern Links notice of requirement Mortality Review Network Group Waikato Child 1003.015 3.4.3 Support in Amend 3.4.3 e) to ensure arterial routes do not sever safe access to and Youth Transport part public recreational space. Mortality Review Network Group Starship Trauma 182.008 3.4.1 Support in Amend Figure 3-4a, #6 in the key by adding the following text "that are The amendments sought are unnecessary as the matters are: Service Structure part clearly defined as vehicular access and clearly separated from child play  Inherent in the provisions regarding good urban design and accessibility Plan areas (public and private)" as set out in the submission.  Already addressed through other provisions in the Plan that focus on site specific proposals (e.g. Chapter 23 Subdivision, Chapter 4 Reject Components Residential Zone, Chapter 5 Special Character Zone, Chapter 25.14 Transportation, Chapter 25.15 Urban Design) Waikato Child 1003.011 3.4.1 Support in Amend Figure 3.4a, #6 to define a separation between vehicle and  At a level of detail that is considered inappropriate in the context of a strategic structure plan chapter and Youth Structure part pedestrian space.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 17 of 63

Mortality Review Plan Group Components Starship Trauma 182.013 3.4.4 Interim Support in Amend 3.4.4c) to include reference to subdivision layout having Service Subdivision part consideration to maximise child safety. Waikato Child 1003.016 Support in Amend 3.4.4c) to include reference to subdivision layout having and Youth part consideration to maximise child safety. Mortality Review Group Starship Trauma 182.017 3.4.6 Support in Amend the Objectives and Policies in 3.4.6 to include child safety Service Objectives part principles as set out in the submission. and Policies Starship Trauma 182.015 Peacocke Amend 3.4.6 to include child safety principles and the text as set out in Service Social the submission Wellbeing Waikato Child 1003.017 Peacocke Support in Amend the introduction to 3.4.6.11 Peacocke Social Wellbeing to insert and Youth Social part text to ensure safety, with specific reference to children is identified Mortality Review Wellbeing within the residential areas. Group

Peacock Structure Plan - General Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Future Proof 608.008 3.4 Support Retain 3.4 Peacocke. Accept in This submission point supports provisions in 3.4 is accepted in part because amendments have been made in response to other Implementation Peacocke Part submission points. See 3.4 in Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Committee Rex Hannam 935.001 Support Retain provisions within the Plan (Parts 3.4, 5.2.8, 5.3-6, 23.3, 23.6 and Accept in This submission point supports provisions in 3.4 is accepted in part because amendments have been made in response to other Appendix 2.2) that manage interim and future development within the Part submission points. See 3.4 in Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Peacocke Structure Plan Area and Peacocke Character Zone. New Zealand 924.016 Support Retain the Peacocke Structure Plan subject to specific amendments Accept in This submission point supports in 3.4 and is accepted in part because amendments have been made in response to other submission Transport requested in the submission. Part points and the specific amendments sought by the submitter are addressed separately. Agency See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. New Zealand 924.017 3.4.3 Support Retain 3.4.3e) Transport Network as notified Accept in This submission point supports 3.4.3e) and is accepted in part because amendments have been made in response to other submission Transport Transport Part points. See 3.4 in Tracked Chjanges for Chapter 3. Agency Network Russelle Knaap 690.013 3.4.3 Oppose Amend 3.4.4 to give priority to motorists in the development of the Reject This submission point is rejected because 3.4.4 is consistent with the: Transport Peacocke Transport Network.  Purpose and Principles of the RMA Network  Objectives and policies of the Plan  Proposed Regional Policy Statement  Regional Walking and Cycling Strategy 2009-2015  Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011-2041  Access Hamilton 2010 and its supporting Action Plans (particularly Travel Demand Action Plan and Active Travel Action Plan)  Future Proof Growth Strategy and Implementation Plan 2009 and the Plan already respond to issues related to the safety of public walkways, so no amendments are necessary. Transpower’s Hamilton Communication Centre Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Transpower New 1083.005 Figure 2-1 Support in Amend Figure 2-1: Peacocke Structure Plan – Land Use to identify Accept Amendments have been made to identify the Hamilton Communications Centre on the Peacocke Structure Plan and to move the Zealand Ltd Peacocke part Transpower’s Hamilton Communications Centre and remove the indicative transport corridor off the site. These amendments: Structure indicative transport corridor link from traversing the site.  Improve the clarity and administration of the Plan. Plan-Land  Avoid confusion regarding future transport corridor expectations. Use  Recognise the Hamilton Communications Centre in the Structure Plan as significant infrastructure and a physical resource critical to providing for the social and economic wellbeing of the country. See Figure 2-1, Figure 2.2 and Figure 15-5e in Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 (1083.005) Transpower New 1083.007 3.4.1.1 Support in Amend 3.4.1.1c) to make reference to the Transpower’s National Reject The amendments sought to 3.4.1.1c) are rejected because they would: Zealand Ltd Natural part Control Centre in Hall Road.  Be out of context as they seek to recognise and protect regionally significant infrastructure, not natural character, which would

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 18 of 63

Character reduce the clarity of the Plan. Areas  The provisions of the Plan (Master Plan process, Objective 3.3.5 and Policy 3.3.6b (Structure Plans), Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1b, 25.7.2.1f (Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridors), 23.2.2a x. and xi. (Subdivision) directly address reverse sensitivity effects and adverse effects of subdivision, use and development on network utilities.  Amendments have been made to the Plan in response to other submission points (1083.005) that provide recognition of the Hamilton Communications Centre. Transpower New 1083.008 Peacocke Support in Insert new objectives and policies, as set out in the submission, into Reject The amendments sought are rejected because: Zealand Ltd Built part 3.4.6.4 Peacocke Built Environment to ensure that existing regionally  The provisions of the Plan (Master Plan process, Objective 3.3.5 and Policy 3.3.6b (Structure Plans), Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies Environment significant infrastructure is not compromised by the development of 25.7.2.1b, 25.7.2.1f (Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridors), 23.2.2a x. and xi. (Subdivision) directly address the structure plan area. reverse sensitivity effects and adverse effects of subdivision, use and development on network utilities, so no amendments are necessary.  Amendments have been made to the Plan in response to other submission points (1083.005) that provide recognition of the Hamilton Communications Centre. 3.4.2 Nodes Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision The Adare 482.006 3.4.2.3 Support in Amend 3.4.2.3 to provide flexibility in the number of community nodes Reject This submission point is rejected because the amendment would: Company Ltd Commercial part within the Peacocke Area.  Be contrary to Policy 3.3.1a. Community  Make the Plan internally inconsistent. Nodes  Reduce the clarity the Plan.  Create administrative uncertainty.

The Master Plan process provides appropriate flexibility to adjust the form and location of the community focal points for those neighborhood areas containing a node. The Ministry of 838.001 3.4.2.3 Oppose Amend 3.4.2.3 to remove references and identification of a secondary Reject This submission point is rejected because 3.4.2.3a) i. does not pre-empt any decision by the Ministry of Education on the need, timing Education Commercial school site in Peacocke Area. or location of any future secondary school and the deletion of the reference would leave no guidance for organisations with interests in Community providing for educational needs. Nodes The Adare FS272.013 Oppose Accept FS272.013 has been accepted because the submission point (838.001) which it opposes has been rejected. Company Ltd Peacocke Stage 1 - Indicative Collector Transport Corridor Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Summerset 814.001 3.4 Support in Amend the Peacocke Structure Plan to relocate the collector road away Accept in It is accepted that the indicative collector road be removed from the Peacocke Structure Plan for the following reasons: Villages Peacocke part from the submitters site or provide flexibility to allow structure plan part  Limited adverse transport effects will be generated as a consequence of its removal (Hamilton) Ltd features to be located in different areas or in modified form from that  An alternative collector road and local road will provide adequate connectivity within the locality shown in the structure plan.  It is unlikely that the indicative collector road would attract a high enough volume of traffic to justify retaining a collector road status  Whilst the removal of road will necessitate changes to the Goan consent this may present an opportunity to improve aspects of the development layout  Feasible alternate access arrangements can be made Paul Dermott FS37.001 Support Accept in FS37.001 is acceped in part as submission 814.001 has been accepted in part and Elizabeth part Maria Corboy Dixon Homes Ltd FS78.001 Oppose Accept in FS78.001 is accepted in part as submission 814.001 has been accepted in part part Goan Holdings FS80.001 Oppose Accept in FS80.001 is accepted in part as submission 814.001 has been accepted in part Ltd part Northview FS163.001 Support Accept in FS163.001 is accepted in part as submission 814.001 has been accepted in part Partnership Ltd part Summerset 814.002 Figure 2-1 Support in Amend Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use to relocate Accept in It is accepted that the indicative collector road be removed from the Peacocke Structure Plan for the following reasons: Villages Peacocke part indicative collector road in Stage 1 of Peacocke as set out in the part • Limited adverse transport effects will be generated as a consequence of its removal (Hamilton) Ltd Structure submission. • An alternative collector road and local road will provide adequate connectivity within the locality Plan-Land • It is unlikely that the indicative collector road would attract a high enough volume of traffic to justify retaining a collector road status Use • Whilst the removal of road will necessitate changes to the Goan consent this may present an opportunity to improve aspects of the development layout

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 19 of 63

• Feasible alternate access arrangements can be made Paul Dermott FS37.001 Support Accept in FS37.001 is accepted in part as submission 814.002 is accepted in part. and Elizabeth part Maria Corboy Dixon Homes Ltd FS78.002 Oppose Accept in FS78.002 is rejected as submission 814.003 is accepted in part. part Goan Holdings FS80.002 Oppose Accept in FS80.002 is rejected as submission 814.003 is accepted in part. Ltd part Summerset 814.003 Figure 2-2 Support in Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Accept in It is accepted that the indicative collector road be removed from the Peacocke Structure Plan for the following reasons: Villages Peacocke part Network to relocate indicative collector road in Stage 1 of Peacocke as part • Limited adverse transport effects will be generated as a consequence of its removal (Hamilton) Ltd Structure set out in the submission. • An alternative collector road and local road will provide adequate connectivity within the locality Plan-Staging • It is unlikely that the indicative collector road would attract a high enough volume of traffic to justify retaining a collector road status and • Whilst the removal of road will necessitate changes to the Goan consent this may present an opportunity to improve aspects of the Transport development layout Network • Feasible alternate access arrangements can be made Paul Dermott FS37.001 Support Accept in FS37.001 is accepted in part as submission 814.003 is accepted in part. and Elizabeth part Maria Corboy Dixon Homes Ltd FS78.003 Oppose Accept in FS78.003 is rejected as submission 814.003 is accepted in part. part Goan Holdings FS80.003 Oppose Accept in FS80.003 is rejected as submission 814.003 is accepted in part. Ltd part Summerset 814.004 Figure 2-3 Support in Amend Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Accept in It is accepted that the indicative collector road be removed from the Peacocke Structure Plan for the following reasons: Villages Peacocke part Neighbourhoods to relocate indicative collector road in Stage 1 of part • Limited adverse transport effects will be generated as a consequence of its removal (Hamilton) Ltd Structure Peacocke as set out in the submission. • An alternative collector road and local road will provide adequate connectivity within the locality Plan- • It is unlikely that the indicative collector road would attract a high enough volume of traffic to justify retaining a collector road status Character • Whilst the removal of road will necessitate changes to the Goan consent this may present an opportunity to improve aspects of the Areas and development layout Neighbourh • Feasible alternate access arrangements can be made oods Paul Dermott FS37.001 Support Accept in FS37.001 is accepted in part as submission 814.004 is accepted in part and Elizabeth part Maria Corboy Dixon Homes Ltd FS78.004 Oppose Accept in FS78.004 is accepted in part as submission 814.004 is accepted in part part Goan Holdings FS80.004 Oppose Accept in FS80.004 is accepted in part as submission 814.004 is accepted in part Ltd part Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Rex Hannam 935.008 Figure 2-2 Oppose Seeks the deletion of provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Accept in This submission point has been accepted in part as given the evidence presented, and recognising that a significant portion of the Peacocke Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas and amend Appendix 2 Part ATCPA is no longer necessary given the protection afforded by lodged notices of requirement and that the remaining ATCPA is mostly Structure Structure Plans to replace Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area on land zoned Future Urban Zone (with limited urban development) or in the majority ownership of a few parties (Ruakura Structure Plan-Staging with designations or Indicative Future Arterial Corridors. Plan Area) the ATCPA and its associated provisions should be deleted from the Plan. The deletion of Appendix 1.2 B3 is not appropriate and however as the criteria is relevant to matters other than the ATCPA. Transport Network See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1 (definitions) and tracked changes for Chapter 25.14 The Adare FS272.024 Oppose Accept in FS270.024 has been accepted in part because the submission point (935.008) which it opposes has been accepted in part. Company Ltd Part David John 251.004 Figure 2-2 Oppose Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network: This submission point has been accepted in part as given the evidence presented, and recognising that a significant portion of the Rushbrooke Peacocke Delete the Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area from the ATCPA is no longer necessary given the protection afforded by lodged notices of requirement and that the remaining ATCPA is mostly Structure Proposed District Plan. on land zoned Future Urban Zone (with limited urban development) or in the majority ownership of a few parties (Ruakura Structure Accept in Plan-Staging Plan Area) the ATCPA and its associated provisions should be deleted from the Plan. The deletion of Appendix 1.2 B3 is not appropriate Part and however as the criteria is relevant to matters other than the ATCPA. Transport Network See Tracked Changes for Appendix 1 (definitions) and tracked changes for Chapter 25.14

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 20 of 63

Barry Harris 1146.115 Figure 2-2 Support in Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan to remove the Arterial (Hamilton City Peacocke part Transport Corridor Protection Area (ATCPA) that falls outside the Council) Structure Peacocke Structure Plan Area. Plan-Staging and Transport Network Arterial Transport Corridor alignment and Southern Links Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Sub. Type Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Provision Richard Ward 325.001 Figure 2-2 Oppose Revert back to the location of the "Eastern Link" Major Arterial Reject This submission point is rejected because the location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Peacocke Transport Corridors as shown in the Peacocke Structure Plan within the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which Structure Operative District Plan and use the existing designation for the minor has been lodged. Plan-Staging arterial roads. and Transport Network New Zealand FS270.081 Oppose Accept FS270.081 has been accepted because the submission point (325.001) which it opposes has been rejected. Transport Agency Richard Ward 325.002 3.4.3 Oppose Amend 3.4.3 to align with the "Eastern Link" within Variation 14. Reject This submission point is rejected because the location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Transport Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which Network has been lodged. The Adare FS272.003 Support Reject FS272.003 has been rejected because the submission point (325.002) which it supports has been rejected. Company Ltd Northview 540.001 3.4.3 Oppose Amend 3.4.3 to indicate that the roading layout within Stage 1 may Accept in This submission point is accepted in part because: Partnership Ltd Transport change as a result of the Southern Links Designation process. Part  The location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent Network on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which has been lodged.  No amendments to the plan are necessary as the Plan already makes reference to the Southern Links designation process (3.4.3e) and, once confirmed, the designation will be incorporated into the Planning Maps. The Adare FS272.005 Support Accept in FS272.005 has been accepted in part because the submission point (540.001) which it supports has been accepted (in part). Company Ltd Part Gillian James 875.001 3.4.3 Oppose Amend 3.4.3 to re-route the Arterial Route shown on the western side Transport of the Mangakotukutuku Gulley as set out in the submission. Network

875.002 Figure 2-2 Oppose Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport These submission points are rejected because the location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in Peacocke Network to re-route the Major Arterial Transport Corridor Route shown Reject the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for Structure on the western side of the Mangakotukutuku Gulley as set out in the which has been lodged. Plan-Staging submission. and Transport Network The Adare FS272.014 Oppose Accept FS272.014 has been accepted because the submission point (875.002) which it opposes has been rejected. Company Ltd The Adare 482.001 Figure 2-1 Support in Retain Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use while providing Company Ltd Peacocke part the opportunity for changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the Structure designated Southern Links alignment. These submission points are accepted in part because: Plan-Land  The location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent Use on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which has been lodged. 482.002 Figure 2-2 Support in Retain Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan – Staging and Transport Accept in  No amendments to the plan are necessary as the Plan already makes reference to the Southern Links designation process (3.4.3e) Peacocke part Network while providing the opportunity for changes to Figures 2-1 to Part and, once confirmed, the designation will be incorporated into the Planning Maps. Structure 2-3 to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment.  Amendments have been made to Figures 2-1 and Figure 2-2 in response to other submissions Plan-Staging and See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Transport Network

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 21 of 63

482.003 Figure 2-3 Support in Retain Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan – Character Areas and Peacocke part Neighbourhoods while providing the opportunity for changes to Figures Structure 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment. Plan- Character Areas and Neighbourh oods J.C Johnson 635.002 Figure 2-1 Support Retain Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use as notified. Family Trust Peacocke Structure Plan-Land Use 635.003 Figure 2-2 Support in Retain Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Peacocke part Network as notified. These submission points are accepted in part because: Structure  The location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent Plan-Staging on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which has been lodged. and Accept in  No amendments to the plan are necessary as the Plan already makes reference to the Southern Links designation process (3.4.3e) Transport Part and, once confirmed, the designation will be incorporated into the Planning Maps. Network Amendments have been made to Figures 2-1 and Figure 2-2 in response to other submissions 635.004 Figure 2-3 Support Retain Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Peacocke Neighbourhoods as notified. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plan- Character Areas and Neighbourh oods Rex Hannam 935.005 Figure 2-1 Oppose Amend Appendices 2.1-3 Peacocke Structure Plan Maps by relocating Accept in That part of this submission point seeking amendments to the location of the arterial transport corridor network is rejected because: Peacocke the Proposed Southern Links Arterial Corridors and amending the Part  The location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent Structure neighbourhood and character areas as set out in the submission. on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which has been lodged. Once the final Plan-Land alignment is confirmed the designation will be incorporated into the Planning Maps. Use That part of this submission point regarding a new neighbourhood area in Figure 2-3 is accepted in part because:  Amendments have been made to Figure 2-3 to identify a new neighbourhood area aligning the boundaries of Neighbourhood Areas 1 and 3 with the arterial transport corridor network in Figure 2.2 and extending the Hills Character Area to align with the the Minor Arterial Transport Corridor to provide a logical boundary .

See Tracked Changes for Appendix 2. The Adare FS272.023 Oppose Accept in FS272.023 has been accepted in part because the submission point (935.005) which it opposes has been accepted in part. Company Ltd Part

Rex Hannam 935.009 Figure 2-3 Oppose Amend Appendices 2.1-3 Peacocke Structure Plan Maps by relocating Accept in That part of this submission point seeking amendments to the location of the arterial transport corridor network is rejected because: Peacocke the Proposed Southern Links Arterial Corridors and amending the Part  The location, form and function of the arterial transport corridor network represented in the Peacocke Structure Plan is contingent Structure neighbourhood and character areas as set out in the submission on the completion of the Southern Links designation project, notices of requirements for which has been lodged. Once the final Plan- alignment is confirmed the designation will be incorporated into the Planning Maps. Character Areas and That part of this submission point regarding a new neighbourhood area in Figure 2-3 is accepted in part because: Neighbourh  Amendments have been made to Figure 2-3 to identify a new neighbourhood area aligning the boundaries of Neighbourhood Areas oods 1 and 3 with the arterial transport corridor network in Figure 2.2 and extending the Hills Character Area to align with the the Minor Arterial Transport Corridor to provide a logical boundary .

See Tracked Changes for Appendix 2. The Adare FS272.025 Oppose Accept in FS272.025 has been accepted in part because the submission point (935.009) which it opposes has been accepted (in part). Oppose Rejected in Part FS272.025 has been Company Ltd Part rejected in part because the submission point (935.009) which it opposes has been accepted (in part).

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 22 of 63

Infrastructural Development Programme and Residential Development Staging Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type New Zealand 924.018 3.4.5 Support Retain Rule 3.4.5 Indicative Infrastructural Development Programme as Accept This submission supports Rule 3.4.5 and is accepted because there are no other submissions seeking amendments to this provision. Transport Agency Indicative notified. Infrastructural Development Programme The Adare FS272.028 Support Accept in FS272.028 has been accepted in part because the submission point (924.018) which it supports has been accepted (in part) and Company Ltd Part amendments sought by the submission are beyond the scope of the principal submission. Blue Wallace 32.001 3.4.5.1 Oppose Delete Rule 3.4.5.1 b) and c) ii as it relates to staging of residential Accept in This submission point is accepted in part because amendments have been made that deletes part of Rule 3.4.5.1b). Complete deletion Surveyors Ltd Proposed development for Peacockes Structure Plan Part of Rules 3.4.5.1 b) and c) ii are premature and would reduce the effectiveness of the Plan in relation to mitigating the adverse Staging of transportation safety effects caused by the development of Stage 1. Residential See Rule 3.4.5.1b) of Tracked Changes for Chapter 3(32.001) Development Andrew Yeoman FS2.002 Support Reject FS2.002 is not related to the matters contained in 32.001.

The Adare FS272.031 Oppose Accept in FS272.031 has been accepted in part because the submission point (32.001) which it opposes has been accepted in part Company Ltd Part New Zealand 924.019 3.4.5.1 Support Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 to ensure that the Proposed Staging of Residential Accept in Amendments have been made that clarifies the status of 3.4.5.1 as a rule which will improve the clarity and administration of the Plan. Transport Agency Proposed in part Development provisions have the status of a rule. Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 part Staging of b) ii to clarify that the 80% dwelling trigger for Stage 1b development That part of this submission point regarding Rule 3.4.5.1 c) ii is accepted because: Residential relates to consented dwellings (not occupied dwellings). Amend Rule  The amendment proposed to Rule 3.4.5.1 c) ii would provide a level of certainty as to the extent of responsibility for the Development 3.4.5.1 c) ii to recognise that the solution for the transport effects on implementation of the Dixon Road / State Highway 3 intersection solution. the Dixon Road / State Highway 3 intersection may require works  Consistent with the intent of the Variation 14 settlement package. elsewhere. See Rule 3.4.5.1 in Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 (924.019)

That part of this submission point regarding Rule 3.4.5.1 b) ii is rejected because:  That part of Rule 3.4.5.1 b) ii has been deleted in response to another submission point. Northview FS163.002 Oppose Reject FS163.002 has been rejected in part because the submission point (924.019) which it opposes has been accepted Partnership Ltd Barry Harris 1146.005 3.4.5.1 Support Amend 3.4.5.1 b) Proposed Staging of Residential Development i) to Reject This submission point is rejected because the amendments would exclude residential development not involving subdivision, this would (Hamilton City Proposed in part refer to 'residential lots' rather than 'dwellings'. reduce the effectiveness of the Plan in relation to mitigating the adverse transportation safety effects caused by the development of Council) Staging of Stage 1. Residential Development Future Reserve Land – 217 Peacocke Road Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Jason Hennessey 328.001 Figure 2-1 Oppose Remove the 'future reserve' land use from property Lot 2 312185 (217 Accept in The amendment to the future reserve will reflect the current situation in relation to proposed roading infrastructure and the existing Peacocke Peacocke Road) as shown on Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Part residential development on the site. Structure Use. Plan-Land Use The Adare FS272.004 Oppose Accept in FS272.004 has been accepted in part because the submission point (328.001) which it opposes has been accepted (in part) Company Ltd part Corrections, Cross referencing and Clarifications Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Barry Harris 1146.006 Peacocke Support Amend the numbering of the first Policy of Objective 3.4.6.16 to correct Accept This is amendment would constitute a minor error under Clause 16(2) of the First Schedule of the Act and will improve the clarity of the (Hamilton City Cultural in part an error. Plan. Council) Environment The Adare 482.005 3.4.1.1 Support Renumber Figures 3.4a and 3.4b to reflect the section within which Accept Amendments have been made that will improve the clarity of the Plan. Company Ltd Natural in part they are located (Section 3.4.1). See 3.4.1, 3.4.2 and 3.4.3 in Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 (482.005) Character Areas

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 23 of 63

Objectives and Policies - Natural Environments, Built Environments, and Social Wellbeing Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type The Adare 482.007 3.4.6 Support Amend 3.4.6 by adding Objectives and Policies for the Peacocke Natural Reject The matters raised in this submission are addressed through other provisions in the Plan, so no amendments are necessary. For Company Ltd Objectives in part Systems, as set out in the submission and derived from the objectives example objectives and policies can be found within chapter 25 – Earthworks and Vegetation Removal, Chapter 3 – Structure Plans, and Policies and policies in Parts 9.2.3a, b and c of the Operative District Plan. Chapter 5 – Special Character Zones, Chapter 23 – Subdivision and Chapter 25 - Transportation. Waikato Regional 714.012 Peacocke Support Replace Objective 3.4.6.1 with an objective that provides for the Accept in That part of this submission point: Council Natural in part protection and enhancement of all remnant natural areas within the Part 1. Supporting Objective 3.4.6.3 and Policies 3.4.6.3a and 3.4.6.3b is accepted because while other submissions have sought System growth cell, as well as ecosystem functions and processes (including amendments they have been rejected. connectivity), indigenous habitats and species requirements, and natural character. 2. Seeking amendments to objectives and policies in 3.4 is rejected because the matters raised in this submission are either already addressed through other provisions in the Plan or have been considered and determined as part of submission points of the submitter Amend Policy 3.4.6.1a by removing reference to stormwater functions to other parts of the Plan. of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and margins, and adding references to ecological functions, indigenous biodiversity and habitats.

Amend Policy 3.4.6.1b by adding reference to opportunities for ecological and habitat enhancement and for restoration of natural character

Amend Policy 3.4.6.1c to provide for the ecological restoration and enhancement (including revegetation with appropriate native species) of gullies and river margins.

Amend Policy 3.4.6.1e to enhance riparian and aquatic habitat and control adverse effects on stream water quality and habitat.

Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.1 that preserve the natural character of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River margins and protect it from inappropriate development and where natural character has already been compromised utilise opportunities to restore and enhance it.

Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.1 that provides for a specific ecological restoration fund from financial or development contributions from development adjacent to the river and gully edges.

Amend Objective 3.4.6.2 to Maintain and enhance the ecological and open space links to the river provided by the Mangakotukutuku Gully.

Amend Policy 3.4.6.2a to Maintain the extent and enhance the quality of ecological (green) corridors of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River margins.

Amend Policy 3.4.6.2b to ensure the alignment of the roading network maintains and enhances the ecological, physical and visual connections of the Mangakotukutuku Gully system and its connection to the Waikato River.

Amend Policy 3.4.6.2c to maintain and enhance the green corridor along the Waikato River to provide for natural character, ecological functions, riparian and aquatic habitat and for public access and amenity.

Retain Objective 3.4.6.3 and Policies 3.4.6.3a and 3.4.6.3b

Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.3 to protect gully landform, natural feature and landscape elements from modification. The Adare FS272.009 Oppose Accept in FS272.009 has been accepted in part because the submission point (714.012) which it opposes has been accepted (in part) Company Ltd Part Waikato Regional 714.013 Peacocke Built Oppose Amend Objective 3.4.6.4, as set out in the submission, to include Reject That part of this submission point seeking amendments to objectives and policies in 3.4 is rejected because the matters raised in this

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 24 of 63

Council Environment reference to maintains or enhances ecological connectivity. Amend submission are either already addressed through other provisions in the Plan or have been considered and determined as part of Policy 3.4.6.4d to support changes to Objective 3.4.6.4 by avoiding or submission points of the submitter to other parts of the Plan. reducing the impact of movement routes on the ecological functions and connectivity of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and the Waikato River. The Adare FS272.010 Oppose Accept FS272.010 has been accepted because the submission point (714.013) which it opposes has been rejected. Company Ltd Waikato Regional 714.014 Peacocke Support Amend Policy 3.4.6.13a by inserting the following text into the policy Reject That part of this submission point seeking amendments to objectives and policies in 3.4 is rejected because the matters raised in this Council Social in part "for enhancement or re-creation of habitats, ecological and physical" as submission are either already addressed through other provisions in the Plan or have been considered and determined as part of Wellbeing set out in the submission. submission points of the submitter to other parts of the Plan.

The Adare FS272.011 Oppose Accept FS272.011 has been accepted because the submission point (714.014) which it opposes has been rejected. Company Ltd Mangakotukutuk 1040.002 Peacocke Support Amend Objective 3.4.6.1 to maintain connectivity for movement of Reject That part of this submission point seeking amendments to objectives and policies in 3.4 is rejected because the matters raised in this u Stream Care Natural in part native animals, including passage for fish and bats" submission are either already addressed through other provisions in the Plan or have been considered and determined as part of Incorporated System submission points of the submitter to other parts of the Plan. Group Add a new policy to 3.4.6.1 to ensure unimpeded movement for native animals (e.g. fish and bats) through the stream and gull network, Chapter 3 provides several guiding principles and strategic objectives, policies, and rules for the staging and development of Structure including road crossings; Plan Areas. It must be read in conjunction with the rest of the Plan as it is not the Plan’s approach to extensively duplicate provisions that exist in other relevant chapters. Amend policy 3.4.6.1a by inserting the word 'natural'; In the Peacocke Character Zone subdivision to an urban density is a Non-complying activity without an approved Master Plan (see Rule Amend policy 3.4.6.1e by inserting the word 'avoid'. 5.3.2, Appendix 1.5.19). The absence of a Master Plan also affects the activity status of land use and development. The preparation of a Master Plan is a Discretionary Activity (Rule 5.3.2.4 a)), or Non-complying when it proposes a Non-complying activity in the related column of the activity status table (Rule 5.3.2.4). Master Plans specifically require consideration of the natural environment and open space networks. It is considered that the matters raised in these submissions are already appropriately reflected in the provisions of the Plan, including the objectives, policies and rules of the following chapters:  2 Strategic Framework  3 Structure Plans  5 Special Character Zones  15 Open Space Zones  20 Natural Environments  21 Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems  23 Subdivision  25.2 Earthworks and Vegetation Removal  25.13 Three Waters Department of 1110.001 Peacocke Support Retain Objectives 3.4.6.1, 3.4.6.2 and 3.4.6.3 and related policies as Accept That part of this submission point supporting Objectives and Policies in 3.4.6.1, 3.4.6.2 and 3.4.6.3 is accepted because while other Conservation Natural notified submissions have sought amendments they have been rejected. System

General Submissions Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Future Proof 608.009 3.5 Rototuna Support Future Proof supports the retention as notified of the provisions Accept The submission point supports the retention of the Rototuna Structure Plan. Implementation relating to the Rototuna and Rotokauri Structure Plan. Committee New Zealand 924.020 Support Amend 3.5 to strengthen the weight given to the provisions (Rototuna Reject The amendment sought would not support the purpose of structure plans within the policy framework of the plan. Transport in part Structure Plan). Agency As set out in section 3.1 Purpose a structure plan illustrates the proposed layout of a future development area. As set out in section 3.1d) the purpose of a structure plan is to plan for the future in an integrated manner along with having guiding principles specific to individual structure plan areas along with mapping that shows the intended pattern of development. Under the purpose it clearly indicates that the information is at a high level and does not typically go into such detail. A structure plan does not control development, it indicates future land uses. The actual development of the land areas are managed through the controls of the underlying zones that are set out through the zoning chapters of the Plan.

Accordingly, as the whole intent of a structure plan is to set the scene and not to drill down into the final design format, leaving that to the subdivision, land use activities via resource consent the language of section 3.5c) is appropriate

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 25 of 63

3.5 Vision Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type New Zealand 924.021 3.5 Vision Support Retain ‘Vision’ for Rototuna in section 3.5 as notified. Accept Submission is accepted as it supports 3.5 Vision. Transport Agency 3.5.1 Objective and Policies Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Jacqueline, 334.005 3.5.1 Support 3.5.1 Rototuna Structure Plan Objectives and Policies. Accept The submission point is accepted as it will: Steward Charles Objectives and Supports Policy 3.5.1a;  Support the objectives and policies of the plan; Jeffery Peters Policies  The inclusion of the pedestrian and cycle network ensures consistency of multi modal transport network through out the Seeks a pedestrian/cycle path at a midway point between where Kay Rototuna Structure Plan area. Road and Horsham Downs Road cross the Expressway. Kirkdale FS178.008 Support Accept The further submission is accepted because the submission point (334.005) to which this further submission relates has been accepted Investments Limited and Kimbrae Farms Limited Waikato 714.015 Support 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies (Rototuna Structure Plan) - Accept in The submission point is accepted in part because: Regional in part Retain objective 3.5.1.3 and policy 3.5.1.3a in relation to ensuring the Part The support for the retention of Objective 3.5.1.3 and policy 3.5.1.3a is accepted Council transport network is managed and developed in a way that provides for Addition of a new objective and policies to address viability of ecological fragments in the Rototuna Structure Plan is rejected as there all modes of transport in an integrated manner. area already adequate policy framework though out the plan to address the concerns.

Add new objective and policies to address landscape features and natural features, ecological corridors, ecological enhancement, retention of existing indigenous vegetation and habitat required to contribute to the viability of ecological fragments. New Zealand FS270.013 Support Accept in The further submission is accepted in part as the submission point (714.015) to which this further submission relates has also been Transport Part accepted in part. Agency New Zealand 924.022 Support Retain Objective 3.5.1.4 (Rototuna Structure Plan) and policies 3.5.1.4b Accept Submission is accepted as it supports Objective 5.5.1.4. Transport and 3.5.1.4c as notified. Agency Structure Plan Components 3.5.2.4 Transportation Network Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type New Zealand 924.023 3.5.2.4 Support Retain 3.5.2.4 a), c), d), e), f) and g). Accept in The submission is accepted in part because: Transport Transportation Part  There is support to retain 3.5.2.4a), c), d), e), f) and g) Agency Network Amend the Plan to recognise that a blanket approach to mitigation will not be appropriate for development to the north-east of the Waikato  The relief sought to modify 3.5.2.4b) is rejected. Expressway Designation (aligned with our specific submission points on Chapter 13) and that 3.5.2.4 b) is amended to ensure this is made clear. Kirkdale FS178.011 Oppose Accept The further submission is accepted because the submission point (924.023) pertaining to 3.5.2.4b) to which this further submission Investments relates has been rejected. Limited and Kimbrae Farms Limited Structure Plan Components 3.5.2.5 Stormwater Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Barry Harris 1146.007 3.5.2.5 Support Amend 3.5.2.5 f) (Stormwater, Rototuna Structure Plan) as set out in Accept The submission point seeking amendment to 3.5.2.5f) be accepted as: (Hamilton City Stormwater in part the submission to delete reference to the avoidance of attenuation  the intent of the Plan is not affected Council) ponds.  clear guidance will be provided to plan users  alignment with the anticipated storm water attenuation in the Te Awa o Katapaki Lower Catchment will be achieved

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 26 of 63

 Alignment with the catchment management requirements of the Waikato Regional Council will be achieved. Structure Plan Components 3.5.2.6 Water and Wastewater Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Barry Harris 1146.008 3.5.2.6 Water Support Amend 3.5.2.6 d) (Water and Wastewater - Rototuna Structure Plan) as Accept The submission point seeking amendment to 3.5.2.6d) be accepted as: (Hamilton City and in part set out in the submission by adding reference to Council in terms of  the intent of the Plan is not affected Council) Wastewater early interaction with developers.  clear guidance will be provided to plan users Structure Plan Components 3.5.2.7 Schools Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type The Roman 953.001 3.5.2.7 Schools Support Retain 3.5.2.7 (a) (Schools in Rototuna Structure Plan area) with Accept The modifications will provide more clarity for plan users of the expected school to be anticipated in the Rototuna area. Catholic Bishop in part amendment to reference future plans of the Roman Catholic Bishop of of the Diocese the Diocese of Hamilton (RCBDH). of Hamilton Appendix 2 Figure 2-4, 2-5, and 2-6 Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Borman 874.001 Figure 2-4 Oppose Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan-Land Use - Seeks the deletion of Reject The submission point is rejected as it is fundament for the key development elements of a structure plan to be identified to ensure: Parkside LP Rototuna 'The Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-4 and 'The Local Transport  Clarity and guidance to plan users Structure Plan- Corridor' on Figure 2-5.  Alignment with the objective and policy framework of the plan Land Use The overarching purpose of a structure plan and all corresponding maps, figures, diagrams is to set the scene of how the area is intended to be developed, and to ensure development is undertaken in a manner to safeguard integrated planning of the area. Key elements of enabling this to occur are via the structure plan identifying nodes, networks and zoning areas. Figure 2-4 of the Rototuna Structure Plan suite identifies the land uses (Figure 2-5 identifies transport networks and Figure 2-6 cycling and walking networks).

The transport network is also important to ensure a high level of connectivity is achieved. In addition, the placement of these key elements within both Figure 2-4 and 2-5 have not been altered from that confirmed through the decisions to V12 and are considered to inform developers of the expectations and overall configuration of the networks in which they are to develop within.

The submitter also correctly identifies that their property must be developed via a comprehensive development plan. .

It is considered appropriate that Figure 2-4 remain unaltered. New Zealand 924.198 Support Retain Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan - Land Use as notified, Accept in The submission point is accepted as it supports the retention of Figure 2-4. Transport subject to changes requested in the wider submission. Part Agency Transpower 1083.003 Support a) Retain Figure 2-4: Rototuna Structure Plan – Land Use in Appendix 2 Accept The submission point is accepted as it supports the retention of Figure 2-4. New Zealand including the identification of Transpower’s existing electricity Ltd transmission lines and the electricity transmission corridor without modification.

b) Adopt any other such relief, including additions, deletions or consequential amendments necessary as a result of the matters raised in these submissions, as necessary to give effect to this submission Borman 874.002 Figure 2-5 Support Figure 2-5 Rototuna Structure Plan-Transport Network - Seeks the Reject The submission point is rejected as it is fundament for the key development elements of a structure plan to be identified to ensure: Parkside LP Rototuna in part deletion of 'The Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-4 and 'The Local  Clarity and guidance to plan users Structure Plan- Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-5.  Alignment with the objective and policy framework of the plan Transport Network Figure 2-5 identifies transport networks that are important to ensure a high level of connectivity is achieved and as such in a structure plan context is important, along with the other key elements (such as land uses, multimodal transport networks, cycling and walking) are important, and regarded as necessary to include in the Structure Plan.

It is unclear as to the submitter’s direct concerns and desire to have Figure 2-5 deleted when support for the notation is indicated.

Therefore, without this clarity, and the importance of keeping the transport network information to ensure a completeness of information is available to plan users it is considered that Figure 2-5 remain unaltered.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 27 of 63

New Zealand 924.199 Support Amend Figure 2-5 to include proposed/indicative Pubic Transport Reject The submission is rejected as the addition of information proposed by the submitter that Council does not have control over would Transport in part networks in the Rototuna Structure Plan area transport plan as per the impact on the administration of the plan. Agency maps in Variation 12 (Plan Change 1, Operative District Plan). The determination of the bus network and route management is the responsibility of the Waikato Regional Council. Nevertheless, the routes, in most cases follow the collector road network set out through the transport hierarchy determined by the City. The retention or modification of these routes is at the sole discretion of the Regional Council as so if that information was also imbedded into the Plan there would be an issue of having to update the Plan. Accordingly, it is not considered appropriate to specifically identify PT network within the Plan. Borman 874.003 Figure 2-6 Support Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network - Accept in This submission is accepted in part as although there is support for the retention of Figure 2-6, there is also a question raised about Parkside LP Rototuna In the submitter's view, Figure 2-6 indicates a cycling and walking part funding and who is responsible which is out side of the scope of this First Schedule process. Cycling and network path(s) along the north side of Future Reserve. Should these Walking objections not be upheld in their submission, Council as the future Network owner of the reserve will be expected to provide the major funding for the corridors. New Zealand 924.200 Support Amend Figures 2-4 (Rototuna Structure Plan - Land Use), 2-5 (Rototuna Accept The amendments to Figure 4-5 corrects an editorial error and ensures consistency of information that will improve plan Transport in part Structure Plan - Transport Network), and 2-6 (Rototuna Cycling and administration. Agency Walking Network) to correctly show consistent walking and cycling networks.

Maps Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Rototuna 1032.001 Zoning Map Support Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side Accept in Whilst the submission sought to retain the large lot residential zone on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway as a consequence Holdings Ltd 3A in part of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; part of Variation 12 being resolved through the Environment Court agreement has been reached between all the parties to zone the land as Special Character Zone and an open space area will be identified on the Structure Plan. Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;

Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Kirkdale FS178.001 Support Accept in FS178.001 is accepted in part as submissn 1032.001 is accepted in part Investment part s Limited and Kimbrae Farms Limited Nancy FS255.001 Support Accept in FS255.001 is accepted in part as submissn 1032.001 is accepted in part Cooper part Roland FS281.001 Support Accept in FS281.001 is accepted in part as submissn 1032.001 is accepted in part Olliver part Cooper Rototuna 1032.002 Zoning Map Support Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side Accept in Whilst the submission sought to retain the large lot residential zone on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway as a consequence Holdings Ltd 4A in part of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; part of Variation 12 being resolved through the Environment Court agreement has been reached between all the parties to zone the land as Special Character Zone and an open space area will be identified on the Structure Plan. Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;

Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Kirkdale FS178.001 Support Accept in FS178.001 is accepted in part as submission 1032.002 is accepted in part Investment part s Limited and Kimbrae Farms Limited

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 28 of 63

Nancy FS255.002 Support Accept in FS255.002 is accepted in part as submission 1032.002 is accepted in part Cooper part Roland FS281.002 Support Accept in FS281.002 is accepted in part as submission 1032.002 is accepted in part Olliver part Cooper Rototuna 1032.003 Zoning Map Support Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side Accept in Whilst the submission sought to retain the large lot residential zone on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway as a consequence Holdings Ltd 5A in part of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; part of Variation 12 being resolved through the Environment Court agreement has been reached between all the parties to zone the land as Special Character Zone and an open space area will be identified on the Structure Plan. Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;

Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Kirkdale FS178.001 Support Accept in FS178.001 is accepted in part as submission 1032.003 is accepted in part Investment part s Limited and Kimbrae Farms Limited Nancy FS255.003 Support Accept in FS255.003 is accepted in part as submission 1032.003 is accepted in part Cooper part Roland FS281.003 Support Accept in FS281.003 is accepted in part as submission 1032.003 is accepted in part Olliver part Cooper Rototuna 1032.004 Zoning Map Support Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side Accept in Whilst the submission sought to retain the large lot residential zone on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway as a consequence Holdings Ltd 11A in part of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11; part of Variation 12 being resolved through the Environment Court agreement has been reached between all the parties to zone the land as Special Character Zone and an open space area will be identified on the Structure Plan. Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;

Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the concerns of the submitter. Kirkdale FS178.001 Support Accept in FS178.001 is accepted in part as submission 1032.004 is accepted in part Investment part s Limited and Kimbrae Farms Limited Nancy FS255.004 Support Accept in FS255.004 is accepted in part as submission 1032.004 is accepted in part Cooper part New FS270.087 Oppose Accept in FS270.087 is accepted in part as submission 1032.004 is accepted in part Zealand part Transport Agency Roland FS281.004 Support Accept in FS281.004 is accepted in part as submission 1032.004 is accepted in part Olliver part Cooper

3.6 Rotokauri Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Future Proof 608.010 3.6 Rotokauri Support Retain section 3.6 Rotokauri Structure Plan Accept in Other submissions sought amendments or deletions to the provisions that this submission relates to. These other submissions have Implementation part been declined for the reasons stated.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 29 of 63

Committee Hounsell 1104.015 3.6 Rotokauri Oppose Provide Rules in all zones so that any activity that compromises the Accept in Chapter 3 sets out objectives and policies that apply to all Structure Plan areas. When subdivision and/or development are proposed Holdings Ltd ability to give effect to a structure plan outcome requires consent as a Part within a Structure Plan area it must be in accordance with these objectives and policies. Under the analysis of submissions to Objective Restricted Discretionary Activity. Discretion would be restricted to 3.3 in the Objectives and Policies section above, it has been determined that this wording change from being ‘in accordance’ to matters relating to alternative methods and locations that can avoid ‘consider where relevant’. A Structure Plan is not meant to be a blueprint and therefore some flexibility is provided in the way in which adverse effects on structure plan outcomes, and include conditions that the provisions of the Structure Plan are given effect to, particularly if some objectives and policies are not relevant. limit consent duration. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Porter 1164.011 3.6 Rotokauri Oppose Amend the Plan so that any activity that compromises the ability to give Accept in Chapter 3 sets out objectives and policies that apply to all Structure Plan areas. When subdivision and/or development are proposed Properties Ltd effect to a structure plan outcome requires consent as a Restricted Part within a Structure Plan area it must be in accordance with these objectives and policies. Under the analysis of submissions to Objective Discretionary Activity with discretion restricted to matters relating to 3.3 in the Objectives and Policies section above, it has been determined that this wording change from being ‘in accordance’ to alternative methods and locations that can avoid adverse effects on ‘consider where relevant’. A Structure Plan is not meant to be a blueprint and therefore some flexibility is provided in the way in which structure plan outcomes, and include conditions that limit consent the provisions of the Structure Plan are given effect to, particularly if some objectives and policies are not relevant. duration. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3. Hamilton JV 1170.015 3.6 Rotokauri Oppose Amend the Plan so that any activity that compromises the ability to give Accept in Chapter 3 sets out objectives and policies that apply to all Structure Plan areas. When subdivision and/or development are proposed Investment effect to a structure plan outcome requires consent as a Restricted part within a Structure Plan area it must be in accordance with these objectives and policies. Under the analysis of submissions to Objective Company Ltd Discretionary Activity with discretion restricted to matters relating to 3.3 in the Objectives and Policies section above, it has been determined that this wording change from being ‘in accordance’ to alternative methods and locations that can avoid adverse effects on ‘consider where relevant’. A Structure Plan is not meant to be a blueprint and therefore some flexibility is provided in the way in which structure plan outcomes, and include conditions that limit consent the provisions of the Structure Plan are given effect to, particularly if some objectives and policies are not relevant. duration. See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3.

Natural Areas and Lake Waiwhakareke Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Waikato 714.016 3.6.1 Support 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan). Reject This submission point seeks amendments that would duplicate other provisions of the Plan, in particular Objective 20.2.1, and reduce Regional Objectives in part the effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose and principles of the Council and Policies a) Amend Objective 3.6.1.1 by referencing protection and enhancement RMA. of the ecological functioning of key natural areas.

b) Add new Policy 3.6.1.1c as follows: It is considered that the objective and policy framework in relation to the Natural Open Space Zone, Natural Environments and Special 'Subdivision and development provide for the protection and Character Zones (Special Natural Zone) is sufficient to ensure that subdivision and development recognizes and enhances the natural enhancement of ecological connections to, and ecological functioning values of Lake Waiwhakareke, and therefore no changes are madein relation to this submission. of, Lake Waiwhakareke'.

Barry Laurence 350.005 Figure 2-8 Support Supports the inclusion of Lot 2 D P 425316 as part of the Future Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date Flay Rotokauri Reserves namely the Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Park. Structure Plan-Land Use Environmental 1008.004 3.6.1 Support Amend Objective 3.6.1.1 (Rotokauri Structure Plan) to include the Reject This submission point seeks amendments that would duplicate provisions of the Plan, in particular Objective 20.2.1 and reduce the Research Objectives in part protection and enhancement of the ecological functioning of key effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose and principles of the Institute, and Policies natural areas. RMA. University of Waikato It is considered that Objective 20.2.1 already provides for the relief sought by the Environmental Research Institute to the Rotokauri Structure Plan Chapter. The Natural Open Space Zone also contains objectives and policies relating to ecological issues. The submissions are therefore rejected as the matters raised within them are already appropriately dealt with in other sections of the Plan. Iris & Fred 972.002 Figure 2-8 Oppose Seeks confirmation of the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date Bryant Rotokauri Waiwhakareke in its entirety as shown on the Rotokauri Structure Plan Structure and on Zoning Map 33A Plan-Land Use Janice Ann 854.004 Zoning Map Oppose Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential. Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date Verran 24A Max Walker 855.005 Zoning Map Oppose Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential. Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date Verran 24A Michelle Le 201.001 Zoning Map Support Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network - Prou 33A Confirm Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. William Wie & 352.004 Zoning Map Support Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Retain the Open Space Zoning Defer This matter is deferred and the matter will be reconvened at a later date Patricia Tekore 33A in part surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke. Moana

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 30 of 63

Barry James 870.001 Zoning Map Support Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Confirm Future Reserves Crawshaw 33A surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.

School Notation Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Hounsell 1104.008 3.6.2.1 Oppose The notation of School on the submitter's land be deleted from Figure Accept in Amendments clarify the indicative nature of the location of future school provision in the Rotokauri Structure Plan area. The Holdings Ltd Suburban 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) or is clearly shown as Part amendments will improve the internal consistency of the Plan and the clarity of the Plan for users. Centres “indicative” in the text and maps. Specific provision be made for a Concept Plan school shown on a Structure Plan as a Permitted Activity. Amendments to make schools in the Structure Plan area a permitted activity are not accepted as the relief sought is not considered to be a valid resource management approach. Hamilton JV 1170.008 3.6.2.1 Oppose The notation of School on the submitters land be deleted from Figure 2- Accept in Amendments clarify the indicative nature of the location of future school provision in the Rotokauri Structure Plan area. The Investment Suburban 11 or is clearly shown as “indicative” in the text and maps. Specific Part amendments will improve the internal consistency of the Plan and the clarity of the Plan for users. Company Ltd Centres provision be made for a school shown on a Structure Plan as a Concept Plan Permitted Activity. Amendments to make schools in the Structure Plan area a permitted activity are not accepted as the relief sought is not considered to be a valid resource management approach.

Suburban Centre Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Rotokauri 1015.016 3.6.2.3 Oppose 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre - Accept It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Developments Suburban Delete 3.6.2.3c Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Ltd Centre The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business 5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hounsell 1104.009 3.6.2.3 Oppose 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre - Accept It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Holdings Ltd Suburban Remove staging from Rotokauri Suburban Centre. Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Centre The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hamilton JV 1170.009 3.6.2.3 Oppose 3.6.2.3 (c). Remove staging from Rotokauri Suburban Centre. Accept It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Investment Suburban Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Company Ltd Centre The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 31 of 63

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Rotokauri 1015.015 Figure 2-9 Oppose Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network - Accept It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Developments Rotokauri Amend Figure 2-9 to include the entire suburban centre zone within Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Ltd Structure Stage 1. Plan-Staging The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline and Transport character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps. Network As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Fonterra Co- FS89.001 Oppose Accept FS89.001 is accepted as submission 1015.015 is accepted operative Group Limited Passenger Transport Facility Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type KiwiRail 366.002 3.6.2.6 Support KiwiRail supports the provision of PT facilities in the Structure Planning Accept Other submissions sought amendments or deletions to the provisions that this submission relates to. These other submissions have Holdings Passenger for Rotokauri. been declined for the reasons stated specifically. Limited Transport Facility Hamilton JV 1170.064 Figure 2-8 Oppose Amend Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use in accordance with The location of the Passenger Transport Location shown on Figure 3.6.2b is not inconsistent with the southern location shown on Investment Rotokauri the new figure attached to the submission, including by: Figure 2-8 and therefore no change is required. Company Ltd Structure • Adding staging boundaries. The submitter appears to have incorrectly interpreted the Structure Plan boundary notation, shown as a dashed black line on Figures 2- Plan-Land Use • Labelling school sites as “indicative only”. 8 and 2-9 as representing road stopping of part of Tasman Road which is not the case. No changes to Figures 2-8 or 2-9 are required in • Accurately reflecting the location of the Passenger Transport Location response to the submissions. on Figure 3.6.2b. • Either remove the Future Reserve notation from the submitters land The Proposed Plan outlines that a location on Tasman Road, adjacent to The Base has been identified as the preferred site to or designate the land. accommodate the progressive development of a bus-based passenger transport facility (PT Facility) and its longer term integration with • Show the Tasman Road link remaining to align with Figure 3.6.2b. rail. It is also stated that there is potential for a second PT facility further north at the junction of Road and Tasman Road, to Accept in integrate the passenger transport network with the surrounding land use activities. Figures 3.6.2a and 3.6.2b illustrate how the Hamilton JV 1170.065 Figure 2-9 Oppose Amend Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport part establishment of an integrated bus/rail facility could be achieved in the Tasman Road location adjacent to The Base. The illustrations Investment Rotokauri Network by: Company Ltd Structure • Adding areas to the north and west of the suburban centre as Part of provide for an eventual facility. Both of the illustrated locations would eventually require land outside of the current road and rail reserve. Consequently, it is anticipated that the additional land requirements may need to be safeguarded through the designation Plan-Staging Stage 1 as shown on submission attachments. process. As identified above it is accepted that the identified area for the suburban centre on the structure plan be included within and Transport • Provide an alternative route for the central north south collector that Network avoids the need for a large cut and overpass. stage 1. The locations of the public transport facilities were determined via consent order in settlement of an appeal to Variation 18. • Show the Tasman Road link remaining to align with Figure 3.6.2b. The location shown on Figure 3.6.2b is not inconsistent with the southern location shown on Figure 2-8 and therefore no change is required

The submitter appears to have incorrectly interpreted the Structure Plan boundary notation, shown as a dashed black line on Figures 2- 8 and 2-9 as representing road stopping of part of Tasman Road which is not the case. No changes to Figures 2-8 or 2-9 are required in response to the submissions. Infrastructure Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Hounsell 1104.014 3.6.3.1 Water, Oppose Amend 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Services (Rotokauri) Accept This submission point seeks amendments that would update the provisions to reflect recent developments and would improve the Holdings Ltd Wastewater to ensure up-to-date commentary that reflects work/studies effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose and principles of the and undertaken to date (i.e. the extension of the wastewater RMA. Stormwater interceptor/stormwater management recent modeling and catchment Services planning). Porter 1164.010 3.6.3.1 Water, Oppose 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Services (Rotokauri). Accept This submission point seeks amendments that would update the provisions to reflect recent developments and would improve the Properties Ltd Wastewater Amend the text to ensure up-to-date commentary on matters relating effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose and principles of the and to Rotokauri, such as the extension of the wastewater interceptor and RMA. Stormwater stormwater management relating to outcomes of recent modelling and Services catchment planning.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 32 of 63

Hamilton JV 1170.014 3.6.3.1 Water, Oppose 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Services (Rotokauri Accept This submission point seeks amendments that would update the provisions to reflect recent developments and would improve the Investment Wastewater Structure Plan). Update commentary to reflect events that have effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose and principles of the Company Ltd and occurred already at Rotokauri such as the extension of the wastewater RMA. Stormwater interceptor and stormwater management outcomes of recent Services modelling and catchment planning. New Zealand 924.025 3.6.3.2 Roading Support Amend 3.6.3.2 d) as set out in the submission to remove reference to Accept This submission point seeks amendments that would update the provisions to reflect recent developments and would improve the Transport in part the 4-laning on Avalon Drive as this is now complete. effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose and principles of the Agency RMA. Porter 1164.051 Features Map Oppose Features Map 15B - Designate the collector road between Ruffell Road Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Properties Ltd 15B and Gilchrist Street not covered by an approved CDP requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections 166 to 186 of the RMA. Further, Section 3.6.2.7 (d) (Transportation Network) clarifies that Council utilises the designation process for new arterial corridors. This does not include collector roads. Hamilton JV 1170.077 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 24B by including a designation for the Green Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Investment 24B Central Corridor. Designate the remaining collector road link between requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections Company Ltd Ruffell Road and Gilchrist Street. 166 to 186 of the RMA. Hamilton JV 1170.078 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 15B by designating the remaining collector road Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Investment 15B link between Ruffell Road and Gilchrist Street. requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections Company Ltd 166 to 186 of the RMA. Further, Section 3.6.2.7 (d) (Transportation Network) clarifies that Council utilises the designation process for new arterial corridors. This does not include collector roads. Hounsell 1104.011 3.6.2.7 Oppose 3.6.2.7 Transportation Network (Rotokauri Structure Plan): Enable use Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Holdings Ltd Transportation of designation process for protection and acquisition of any transport requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections Network corridors in order to achieve network outcomes. 166 to 186 of the RMA. Further, Section 3.6.2.7 (d) (Transportation Network) already clarifies that Council utilises the designation process for new arterial corridors. Porter 1164.008 3.6.2.7 Oppose 3.6.2.7 Transportation Network. Enable use of designation process for Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Properties Ltd Transportation protection and acquisition of any transport corridors in order to achieve requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections Network network outcomes. 166 to 186 of the RMA. Further, Section 3.6.2.7 (d) (Transportation Network) already clarifies that Council utilises the designation process for new arterial corridors. Porter 1164.052 Features Map Oppose Features Map 24B - Designate the collector road between Ruffell Road Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Properties Ltd 24B and Gilchrist Street not approved by a CDP. requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections 166 to 186 of the RMA. Further Section 3.6.2.7 (d) (Transportation Network) clarifies that Council utilises the designation process for new arterial corridors. This does not include collector roads. Porter 1164.046 Figure 2-9 Oppose Amend Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Accept The submission point is accepted and that the collector road from the Te Kowhai Road north to its connection with Ruffell Road is Properties Ltd Rotokauri Network to: deleted from the structure plan. Structure Plan- • Remove road loop from structure plan and consider alternative local Staging and network layout. The removal of the structure plan road is considered appropriate as all of the site that the proposed road was to go through is owned Transport • Realign loop road to the east of the north south collector to the layout by the submitter and is currently being developed for the submitter’s activities. Network approved in the Te Kowhai Comprehensive Development Cell Comprehensive Development Plan. Removal of the road does not compromise future development as the subject land is in one ownership.

The removal of the structure plan road result in the efficient use of the existing resources such as the existing road corridors and associated services located within such corridors. New Zealand FS270.086 Oppose Reject The proposed amendment will provide the necessary connectivity and ensure efficient functioning of the transport network. Transport Agency B.W & I.V 607.001 Figure 2-8 Oppose That Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use) be amended to Reject The collector road is a necessary component of the overall transport network in the area. This submission point seeks amendments Parsons Rotokauri delete reference to a Transport Corridor crossing Lot 2 DPS 79420 and that would reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose Structure Plan- any other land that is outside of the Rotokauri Structure Plan area. and principles of the RMA. Land Use Given that there is still development yet to occur in this area, the ability to require a collector road formation to ensure that The Boulevard continues so that it will in time connect to Ruffell Road is an important aspect of the overall network planning. The future collector road is also shown on Figure 15-5B, the Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan in Appendix 15-5. The requirement under the Structure Plan chapters to be in general accordance with the provisions shown on structure plans is necessary in order to ensure that the Collector Road is developed at such a time as the site is developed. Without a collector road link, The Boulevard remains a cul-de- sac with all traffic movements required to head south to the Te Kowhai Road roundabout. The future collector road is shown on the Rotokauri Structure Plan in the Operative District Plan as a result of its consideration as part of the Rotokauri Structure Plan Variation 18 to the then Proposed District Plan 2001 B.W & I.V 607.002 Figure 2-9 Oppose That Figure 2-9 (Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Reject The collector road is a necessary component of the overall transport network in the area. This submission point seeks amendments Parsons Rotokauri Network) be amended to delete reference to a Collector Transport that would reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of the Plan in terms of achieving its stated objectives and policies and the purpose

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 33 of 63

Structure Plan- Corridor crossing Lot 2 DPS 79420 and any other land (including those and principles of the RMA. Staging and identified as containing a Major Arterial Transport Corridor) that is Given that there is still development yet to occur in this area, the ability to require a collector road formation to ensure that The Transport outside of the Rotokauri Structure Plan area. Boulevard continues so that it will in time connect to Ruffell Road is an important aspect of the overall network planning. The future Network collector road is also shown on Figure 15-5B, the Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan in Appendix 15-5. The requirement under the Structure Plan chapters to be in general accordance with the provisions shown on structure plans is necessary in order to ensure that the Collector Road is developed at such a time as the site is developed. Without a collector road link, The Boulevard remains a cul-de- sac with all traffic movements required to head south to the Te Kowhai Road roundabout. The future collector road is shown on the Rotokauri Structure Plan in the Operative District Plan as a result of its consideration as part of the Rotokauri Structure Plan Variation 18 to the then Proposed District Plan 2001 Wintec Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Wintec 707.012 Figure 2-11 Oppose Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre. That figure 2-11 be Accept The submission would clarify the proposed use of the land and provide consistency between Figure 2-11, Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri Rotokauri amended as per Appendix 2 attached to the submission. Structure Plan – Land Use) and the zoning maps. Neighbourhood Figure 2-11 shows the “triangle” (Pt Lot 1 DPS 16911) as part of Wintec. Centre This site has been zoned Industrial within the proposed plan and is within the Rotokauri Employment Area. Therefore Figure 2-11 should be amended to reflect this. Barry Harris 1146.116 Figure 2-11 Support Amend Figure 2-11 to reflect land use and ownership changes that have Accept The submission would clarify the proposed use of the land and provide consistency between Figure 2-11, Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri (Hamilton City Rotokauri in part occurred in relation to WINTEC and the Employment Area. Structure Plan – Land Use) and the zoning maps. Council) Neighbourhood Centre Everton Trust 344.003 Figure 2-8 Oppose Amend Figure 2-8 to provide for the intended future use of the property Accept The submission would clarify the proposed use of the land. There are no sound resource management grounds for excluding Lot 1 from Rotokauri recognised as Lot 1 DP 450285 for Residential purposes. being identified for residential use. The amendment to Figure 2-8 will reflect the decision under 344.001 and 344.002 to re-zone the Structure Plan- property to Residential. Land Use Staging - Industrial Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Modern 323.002 Figure 2-8 Support Supports land described as Lot 2 DPS 15248 (SA13B/395) at Te Kowhai Accept The proposed amendment provides a sensible and practical staging boundary. Transport Rotokauri Road being identified for industrial land uses in the Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Limited Structure Plan- Structure Plan - Land Use. Land Use Modern 323.003 Figure 2-9 Oppose Requests that Lot 2 DPS 15248 (SA13B/395) at Te Kowhai Road be Accept The proposed amendment provides a sensible and practical staging boundary. Transport Rotokauri included within Stage 1 of the Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan – Limited Structure Plan- Staging and Transport Network. Staging and Transport Network Hounsell 1104.055 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Amend Map 15A to extend Stage 1 Rotokauri to include additional Accept in Inclusion of the additional land within the Stage 1 boundary is accepted, however the amended Stage 1 boundary should include be Holdings Ltd industrial land to the south of the Te Kowhai Road Extension. part amended to include all properties to be re-zoned Industrial as a result of submissions 914.001, 914.002914.001, 914.002, 916.002, 229.002, 323.001, 323.002, and 323.003. Hamilton JV 1170.074 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A- Increase Stage 1 Rotokauri to include additional industrial Accept in Inclusion of the additional land within the Stage 1 boundary is accepted, however the amended Stage 1 boundary should be amended Investment land to the south of the Te Kowhai Road extension. part to include all properties to be re-zoned Industrial as a result of submissions 914.001, 914.002914.001, 914.002, 916.002, 229.002, Company Ltd 323.001, 323.002, 323.003.

Proposed New Business 7 Zone Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Porter 1164.050 Zoning Map 15A Oppose Map 15A-amend by including an additional Business 7 Zone Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Properties Ltd Neighbourhood Centre in the Te Kowhai CPD area. Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed.

The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (Industrial Zone), suburban centre (Business 5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 34 of 63

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hamilton JV 1170.071 Zoning Map 14A Oppose Map14A-Amend to add a Business 7 Zone Neighbourhood Centre to Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Investment provide accessible local services to the northern areas within the Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Company Ltd Rotokauri Structure Plan; amend the extent of Stage 1 Rotokauri Structure Plan to increase. The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (Business 5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Bypass Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type New Zealand 924.024 3.6 Rotokauri Support The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a), sections Accept The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a), sections 3.6.1.2(a), 3.6.2.9(a) and 3.6.3.2 that would accurately reflect Transport Agency in part 3.6.1.2(a), 3.6.2.9(a) and 3.6.3.2 that would accurately reflect the the current situation given that the Te Rapa Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. current situation given that the Te Rapa Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. An amendment is required to Figure 2-9 to reflect the change in function of the western portion of Koura Drive from minor to major arterial. An amendment is required to Figure 2-9 to reflect the change in function of the western portion of Koura Drive from minor to major arterial. Porter Properties 1164.006 3.6.1 Objectives Oppose The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would Accept The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa Ltd and Policies accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa Bypass is Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. Porter Properties 1164.009 3.6.2.9 Staging Oppose The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would Accept The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa Ltd accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa Bypass is Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. Green Corridor Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Hounsell Holdings 1104.007 3.6.1 Objectives Oppose 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan): Accept in The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Ltd and Policies part consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. 3.6.1.1b Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa corridor on Figure 2-10 Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users.

3.6.1.2a Delete second sentence in policy. Hamilton JV 1170.007 3.6.1 Objectives Oppose 3.6.1.1b (Rotokauri Structure Plan) - Clarify terminology and/or identify Accept in The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Investment and Policies the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. part consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. Company Ltd 3.6.1.2a (Rotokauri Structure Plan) - Delete second sentence in policy as The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa the Te Rapa Bypass is now open and operational. Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. Porter Properties 1164.007 3.6.2.5 Open Oppose 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network (Rotokauri) - Accept in The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Ltd Space Network Seeks the review of the reference to the central green corridor by part consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. clarifying terminology and/or identifying the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. The submission point seeks amendments to Policy 3.6.1.2 (a) that would accurately reflect the current situation given that the Te Rapa

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 35 of 63

Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users.

Hounsell Holdings 1104.013 3.6.2.8 Oppose 3.6.2.8 Industrial (Rotokauri Structure Plan). Clarify terminology and/or Accept in The submission point seeks amendments in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal consistency of the Plan, Ltd Industrial identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. part the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan.

Hamilton JV 1170.013 3.6.2.8 Oppose 3.6.2.8 Industrial (Rotokauri Structure Plan). Clarify terminology and/or Accept in The submission point seeks amendments in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal consistency of the Plan, Investment Industrial identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. part the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. Company Ltd Hounsell Holdings 1104.048 Figure 2-11 Oppose Amend Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre to show the Accept in The detailed stormwater solution will be determined by more detailed modeling at such a time as the area was developed. Notating Ltd Rotokauri indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre part Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) as being ‘indicative’ only will provide clarification for Plan users. Neighbourhood including Centre • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre

• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hamilton JV 1170.067 Figure 2-11 Oppose Amend Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre to show the Accept in The detailed stormwater solution will be determined by more detailed modeling at such a time as the area was developed. Notating Investment Rotokauri indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre part Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) as being ‘indicative’ only will provide clarification for Plan users. Company Ltd Neighbourhood including Centre • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre

• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hounsell Holdings 1104.050 Figure 2-13 Oppose Amend Figure 2-13 Rotokauri Suburban Centre Primary Frontages to Accept in The detailed stormwater solution will be determined by more detailed modeling at such a time as the area was developed. Notating Ltd Rotokauri show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through part Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) as being ‘indicative’ only will provide clarification for Plan users. Suburban suburban centre including Centre Primary Frontages • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre

• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hamilton JV 1170.069 Figure 2-13 Oppose Amend Figure 2-13 Rotokauri Suburban Centre Primary Frontages to Accept in The detailed stormwater solution will be determined by more detailed modeling at such a time as the area was developed. Notating Investment Rotokauri show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through part Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) as being ‘indicative’ only will provide clarification for Plan users. Company Ltd Suburban suburban centre including Centre Primary Frontages • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre

• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hounsell Holdings 1104.049 Figure 2-12 Oppose Amend Figure 2-12 Rotokauri Interface Areas to show the indicative Accept in The detailed stormwater solution will be determined by more detailed modeling at such a time as the area was developed. Notating Ltd Rotokauri proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including part Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) as being ‘indicative’ only will provide clarification for Plan users. Interface Areas • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre

• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hamilton JV 1170.068 Figure 2-12 Oppose Amend Figure 2-12 Rotokauri Interface Areas to show the indicative Accept in The detailed stormwater solution will be determined by more detailed modeling at such a time as the area was developed. Notating Investment Rotokauri proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including part Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) as being ‘indicative’ only will provide clarification for Plan users. Company Ltd Interface Areas • Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre

• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose. Hounsell Holdings 1104.057 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 23B by including a designation for the Green Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Ltd 23B Central Corridor. requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections 166 to 186 of the RMA. Hamilton JV 1170.076 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 23B by including a designation for the Green Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 36 of 63

Investment 23B Central Corridor. requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections Company Ltd 166 to 186 of the RMA. Hounsell Holdings 1104.058 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 24B by including a designation for the Green Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Ltd 24B Central Corridor. requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections 166 to 186 of the RMA. Hamilton JV 1170.077 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 24B by including a designation for the Green Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Investment 24B Central Corridor. Designate the remaining collector road link between requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections Company Ltd Ruffell Road and Gilchrist Street. 166 to 186 of the RMA. Hounsell Holdings 1104.056 Features Map Oppose Amend Features Map 14B by including a designation for the Green Reject The outcome sought by the submission is beyond the scope of the District Plan submission process. In accordance with the Ltd 14B Central Corridor. requirements of the RMA any new or altered designation must be initiated by the relevant requiring authority and is subject to sections 166 to 186 of the RMA. Open Space Network Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Hounsell Holdings 1104.010 3.6.2.5 Open Support 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network (Rotokauri): Accept in The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Ltd Space Network in part part consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. Amendment to 3.6.2.5(b) to clarify the role of the Central North-South Collector Transport Corridor will assist with the administration and implementation of the Plan. Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Collector Transport Corridor”. Amendment to 3.6.2.5 (b) to delete reference to the 50 m width of the central green corridor more accurately reflects that the actual width will be determined by more detailed modelling at the time of development. Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10 The requested to add reference to school sites to 3.6.2.5 v) is not accepted as school sites are private property and do not contribute to the level of service for open space provision. The reference to the 50m central green corridor requires review given that the stormwater system has proven to be impractical.

Add as 3.6.2.5 v) “School sites – sports fields and other informal recreation space available for public use.” Hamilton JV 1170.010 3.6.2.5 Open Support 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network Accept in The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Investment Space Network in part Amend, as set out in submission: part consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. Company Ltd Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green Amendment to 3.6.2.5(b) to clarify the role of the Central North-South Collector Transport Corridor will assist with the administration corridor on Figure 2-10. and implementation of the Plan.

Add a policy on the form and function of the “Central North South The requested to add reference to school sites to 3.6.2.5 v) is not accepted as school sites are private property and do not contribute to Collector Transport Corridor”. the level of service for open space provision.

Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10

Add the following to 3.6.2.5a) "v) School sites – sports fields and other informal recreation space available for public use.” Hounsell Holdings 1104.047 Figure 2-10 Oppose Amend Figure 2-10 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Reserve Network title to Accept in The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Ltd Rotokauri 'Open Space Network' to: part consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. Structure Plan- Show specific location of central green corridor; Reserve Amendment to 3.6.2.5(b) to clarify the role of the Central North-South Collector Transport Corridor will assist with the administration Network Show the stormwater drainage pattern that has been developed as part and implementation of the Plan. of the Catchment Management Plan for Rotokauri; It is considered appropriate to reflect the provisions of the draft Integrated Catchment Management Plan and the works that have Show the “recreational nodes” on the Figure and include in the legend already occurred on Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri Structure Plan – Land Use) and Figure 2-10 (Open Space Network) and delete the previous with separate symbol. green drainage corridor shown in that location.

Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green Showing recreational nodes on Figure 2-10 would be inconsistent with other Structure Plans and would not accurately reflect the corridor on Figure 2-10. The green central corridor route should be recreational provision in the Structure Plan. It is not considered that a change to Figure 2-10 is required. designated.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 37 of 63

Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Collector Transport Corridor”. Hamilton JV 1170.066 Figure 2-10 Oppose Amend Figure 2-10 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Reserve Network by: Accept in The change to the title of Figure 2-10 is accepted as the amendment will improve the internal consistency and usability of the Plan. Investment Rotokauri • Changing the title to “Open Space Network”. part Company Ltd Structure Plan- • Show specific location of central green corridor. The submission point seeks amendments to Figure 2-10 in relation to the central green corridor that will improve the internal Reserve • Show the stormwater drainage pattern that has been developed as consistency of the Plan, the clarity of the Plan for users and the administration and implementation of the Plan. Network part of the Catchment Management Plan for Rotokauri. • Show the “recreational nodes” on the Figure and include in the legend It is considered appropriate to reflect the provisions of the draft Integrated Catchment Management Plan and the works that have with separate symbol. already occurred on Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri Structure Plan – Land Use) and Figure 2-10 (Open Space Network) and delete the previous • Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green green drainage corridor shown in that location. corridor on Figure 2-10 and designate the route. Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Showing recreational nodes on Figure 2-10 would be inconsistent with other Structure Plans and would not accurately reflect the Collector Transport Corridor”. recreational provision in the Structure Plan. It is not considered that a change to Figure 2-10 is required.

Additional residential development in Stage One and general structure plan matters Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Hounsell 1104.045 Figure 2-8 Oppose Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use - Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Holdings Ltd Rotokauri Amend Figure 2-8 in accordance with the attached Figure set out in the Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Structure Plan- submission to show Medium density residential development Land Use extending to the north of the Suburban Centre; and The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline Include staging boundary on Figure 2-8. character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hounsell 1104.046 Figure 2-9 Oppose Amend Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Accept In It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Holdings Ltd Rotokauri Network to include additional areas to the north and west of the Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Structure Plan- suburban centre as Part of Stage 1 as shown on attachments set out in Staging and the submission. The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline Transport character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps. Network Provide an alternative route for the central north south collector that avoids the need for a large cut and overpass. As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15.

The alignment of the central north-south collector is considered to be the best available alternative. The Structure Plan is not a blueprint and the exact alignment of the collector road can change as long as there is a continuous route provided which delivers the required connectivity and outcomes. Hamilton JV 1170.012 3.6.2.9 Staging Oppose 3.6.2.9 Staging (Rotokauri Structure Plan) Accept in Clarifying the location of the various cross sections will assist Plan users. Investment part Company Ltd Amend as set out in the submission to: The submission point seeks amendments to 3.6.2.9 and is accepted it accurately reflects the current situation given that the Te Rapa Include reference to where the various cross sections apply (Figures Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. 3.6.2a - g); Delete second sentence in policy; It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Include additional areas to the north and west of the suburban centre Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. as Part of Stage 1.; Include the text to fully explain the rationale of staging: The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline “The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate efficient development of character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps. infrastructure and provide necessary critical mass for the provision of local services. The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate completion of a road As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 38 of 63

network with a desirable level of connectivity.” prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. New Zealand FS270.025 Oppose Accept in The submission is only accepted in part because amendments have been made in response to part of the submission 1170.012. Transport part Agency Hounsell 1104.012 3.6.2.9 Staging Oppose 3.6.2.9 Staging (Rotokauri Structure Plan) and Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, Accept in Clarifying the location of the various cross sections will assist Plan users. Holdings Ltd 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g. part The submission point seeks amendments to 3.6.2.9 and is accepted as it accurately reflect s the current situation given that the Te For each Figure include reference to where the various cross sections Rapa Bypass is open and operational and would assist with the clarity of the Plan for users. apply. The proposed amendment to staging would be inconsistent with the Proposed Regional Policy Statement (Decisions Version November Delete second sentence in policy 3.6.2.9 2012), Future Proof, and the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy.

Include additional areas to the north and west of the suburban centre as Part of Stage 1.

Include commentary that fully explains the rationale of staging: “The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate efficient development of infrastructure and provide necessary critical mass for the provision of local services. The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate completion of a road network with a desirable level of connectivity.” Hounsell 1104.054 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A-increase the extent of Stage 1 to include additional residential Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Holdings Ltd areas to the north and west of the existing first stage. Medium density Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. residential zoning to be shown extending to the north of the Suburban Centre. Any loss of employment land can be addressed through an The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (Business 5 Zone), residential and ridgeline extension to the north of Ruffell Road, which is currently shown outside character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps. the structure plan area. As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hamilton JV 1170.073 Zoning Map 24A Oppose Map 24A- Extend Stage 1 of Rotokauri Structure Plan. Extend medium Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Investment density residential zoning. Extend employment land to the north of Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Company Ltd Ruffell Road. Buffer area adjacent to the Suburban Centre crosses the intended road alignment. The Special Natural Zone/Ridgeline Character The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline Area extends too far down Lee Road. The residential Zone will provide character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps. an appropriate transition to medium density residential. Zone all of Commercial centre Business 5. As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hounsell 1104.053 Zoning Map 23A Oppose Map 23A-increase the area of Stage 1 Rotokauri Structure Plan. The Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Holdings Ltd Special Natural Zone/Ridgeline Character Area extends too far down Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Lee Road. The residential Zone will provide an appropriate transition to medium density residential. The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 39 of 63

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hamilton JV 1170.072 Zoning Map 23A Oppose Map 23A- Stage 1 Rotokauri Structure Plan should be increased to Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Investment include additional residential areas to the north and west of the existing Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Company Ltd first stage. The Special Natural Zone/Ridgeline Character Area extends too far down Lee Road. The residential Zone will provide an appropriate The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline transition to medium density residential. character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hounsell 1104.052 Zoning Map 14A Oppose Amend Map 14A to add land to Stage 1 of Rotokauri Structure Plan. Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Holdings Ltd Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed.

The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps.

As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15. Hamilton JV 1170.065 Figure 2-9 Oppose Amend Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Accept in It is accepted that Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan is enlarged as the proposed District Plan enables development whereby Investment Rotokauri Network by: Part Development Agreements are provided for if infrastructure is not funded by Council to allow development to proceed. Company Ltd Structure Plan- • Adding areas to the north and west of the suburban centre as Part of Staging and Stage 1 as shown on submission attachments. The Structure plan identified the areas for employment (industrial zone), suburban centre (business5 Zone), residential and ridgeline Transport • Provide an alternative route for the central north south collector that character area (Special Natural Zone) and has been carried through to the planning maps. Network avoids the need for a large cut and overpass. • Show the Tasman Road link remaining to align with Figure 3.6.2b. As part of accepting the expansion of stage 1 it is imperative that a full Integrated Catchment Management Plan (ICMP) be developed prior to any further development of stage 1, which is to involve multiple parties.

Figure 6.1 Rotokauri Stage 1 Comprehensive Development Plan Cell is expanded to show the Employment Area and Figure 15-8a is expanded to apply which requires specific Integrated Transport Requirements by rule 25.14.4.3 (e).

See Tracked Changes for Chapter 3 Structure Plans, Chapter 25.13 Three Waters, and Appendix 6 and 15 Hamilton JV 1170.064 Figure 2-8 Oppose Amend Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use in accordance with Reject The location of the Passenger Transport Location shown on Figure 3.6.2b is not inconsistent with the southern location shown on Investment Rotokauri the new figure attached to the submission, including by: Figure 2-8 and therefore no change is required. This submission is therefore rejected. Company Ltd Structure Plan- • Adding staging boundaries. Land Use • Labelling school sites as “indicative only”. The submitter appears to have incorrectly interpreted the Structure Plan boundary notation, shown as a dashed black line on Figures 2- • Accurately reflecting the location of the Passenger Transport Location 8 and 2-9 as representing road stopping of part of Tasman Road which is not the case. No changes to Figures 2-8 or 2-9 are required in on Figure 3.6.2b. response to the submission. • Either remove the Future Reserve notation from the submitters land or designate the land. • Show the Tasman Road link remaining to align with Figure 3.6.2b. Myra Evans- 219.001 Map 33A Oppose Obtrusive to outlook. Reject This submission point does not clearly state the relief sought. McLeod Fonterra 1200.057 Features Map Support Retain Features Map 25B as notified. Accept This submission supports Features Map 25B and is accepted because there are no other submissions seeking amendments to that Co-operative 25B Map. Group Ltd

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 40 of 63

3.7 Ruakura Sub. Name Sub. Point Plan Provision Sub. Summary Decision Reasoning FS. Name FS. Point Type Wei Lee 763.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plans reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Ming-San 764.003 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District (Arvin) & Meng- Plans buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Chu (Anna) properties Tang Ken & Hong 827.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Shang & Wang Plans subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Roads Kung-Yao Lin 831.002 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plans rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Derrick Ross & 835.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Robyn Mary Plans reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Marsters Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Allan Liang-chitz 861.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District & Shirley Tzu- Plans subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . ling Wan Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Raylene & Saul 864.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cowie & Spriggs Plans subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. Bryce & Natasha 910.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Carmichael Plans rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. William Roy 928.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cowie Plans earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. Deanna - Rose 979.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Alexander Plans permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . property. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.007 3 Structure Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plans residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Alan Frederick & 1005.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 41 of 63

Barbara Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Winifred Julian Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property. Peter & Barbara 1006.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Ryan Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Bo & Meggie 1007.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Han & Wang Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Shing-long Lee 1224.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted earth bund. c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Provide development rights same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the structure plan. Kerry & Donna 1257.004 3 Structure Oppose Opposes the Ruakura Industrial zone. Either purchase the property or Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Willmott Plans amend the plan to allow semi-commercial use on 63 Ryburn Road Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Ruakura 1275.005 3 Structure Oppose 3 Structure Plans -amend Ruakura Structure Plan Figure 2-14 to identify Residents Group Plans land as Large Lot residential; remove reference to transitional use of and William Roy land as large lot residential and future use as Ruakura Logistics; if Cowie unacceptable rezone 100m buffer as Open Space.

This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Future Proof FS181.013 Oppose Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Implementation Committee Tainui Group FS196.053 Oppose Holdings Limited David Evan & 1278.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the existing Rural Residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Karlene Chibnall Plans associated development rights. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Percival and Ryburn Roads with a planted earth bund. c) ensure continuing vehicle access for commuting; and ensure fair treatment over privately owned land. Roland & 1279.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning with the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Wendy Spirig Plans addition of a 100m planted buffer. b) restrict the operating hours of the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . port to daylight hours and provide for a way to lodge noise complaints. David Murray 1280.001 3 Structure Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the existing Rural Residential Zoning with Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District and Karen Lee Plans associated development rights. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Young Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted earth bund. c) Remove the deferred logistics zoning from the proposed plan. Dennis Roy 56.001 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Opposes the concept of an Inland Port. McLeod Dennis Roy FS3.001 Support McLeod This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Future Proof FS181.011 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Implementation Committee Tainui Group FS196.04 Oppose

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 42 of 63

Holdings Limited Brett Hopkins 234.001 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan and undertake consultation with the (Ruakura community to develop innovation precinct and residential areas. Motors Tractorparts Ltd) This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Simon FS67.034 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Travaglia (Waikato Innovation Park Limited) Deborah June 282.018 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete Ruakura Structure Plan until further consideration of the effects Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher on the surrounding area have been investigated and publicly notified. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . b) ensure a "Noise Management Plan" is completed prior to inclusion of the Structure Plan. Josina 289.001 3.7 Ruakura Support Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks residential Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Wilhelmina in part zoning. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Maria Ellis KiwiRail 366.003 3.7 Ruakura Support Supports Ruakura Structure Plan Holdings Limited This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Tainui Group FS196.008 Support Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Holdings Limited Future Proof 608.011 3.7 Ruakura Support Supports 3.7 Ruakura Structure Plan and requests it be retained. Implementation Committee William Roy FS143.011 Oppose and Raewyn Mary Cowie Ruakura FS167.002 Oppose Residents This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Group and Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . William Roy Cowie Tainui Group FS196.001 Support Holdings Limited Chedworth FS197.001 Support Properties Limited AgResearch Ltd 609.002 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7b by rewriting to ensure that it is not viewed as in part compromising the CBD. Delete 3.7h and associated staging rules in Rule 3.7.3.6 as it affects the development of future innovation & research activities and the development of supporting retail & commercial activities. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Simon FS67.006 Support Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Travaglia (Waikato Innovation Park Limited) Waikato 714.017 3.7 Ruakura Support Move the Industrial Land Allocation table 3.7f to Chapter 2 Strategic Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Regional Council in part Framework and link the table to relevant parts of the Structure Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Chapter OR, move the table to the front of the Structure Plan Chapter. Waikato-Tainui 771.012 3.7 Ruakura Support Supports the Ruakura Structure Plan and landuse identified. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Te Kauhanganui Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inc

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 43 of 63

James & 832.001 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend Rules 23.7.3 d),e), f), i), j), k), h) to enable subdivision at 2500m2 Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Heather Hely & in part in the Large Lot Residential Zone as a Permitted Activity. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Montgomerie Gwyneth Ann FS25.003 Support Verkerk (and Dr Raymond Thomas Cursons) Stephen George 906.011 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies Bigwood in part development of areas larger than what staging provides for as a non- complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. New Zealand FS270.016 Support Transport Agency Hugh and Katie 911.003 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete Ruakura Structure Plan and requests consultation occurs with Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Goodman and the community. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Mayes Tainui Group 913.012 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7b to update land area; reword 3.7d to relate to strengthening Holdings Ltd in part the CBD. Amend 3.7f footnote provides flexibility if Waikato Expressway not completed; delete 3.7h and associated staging rules in 3.7.3.6.

University of FS47.003 Oppose Waikato William FS160.001 Oppose This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Cornelis Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Jennifer West FS271.016 Oppose

New Zealand 924.026 3.7 Ruakura Support Retain staging for Ruakura in 3.7 as notified Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Transport in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Agency Titanium Park 945.001 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Amend 3.7(f) to update the table 'Industrial Land Allocation in the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Joint Venture Future Proof Area' to take account of the appeal by Titanium Park Joint Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Venture to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement. ANG & SL 951.007 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7a) to add the Large Lot Residential Zone to the Ruakura Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Clarke in part Structure Plan vision. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Waikato 1051.001 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7d to identify employment opportunities are centred on Innovation Park in part "innovation and research". Amend 3.7h to enable development of a Limited suburban centre. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Tainui Group FS196.024 Support Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing. Holdings Limited Fonterra Co- 1200.011 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7f) to include a footnote to the Table that advises the Waikato Defer The submissions relate to elements of the Ruakura Structure Plan. It is appropriate to defer until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision operative Group in part Proposed Regional Policy Statement is subject of appeals. on the private plan change for Ruakura to the Operative District Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will Ltd be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing Susan Hopkins 1264.003 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete 3.7 Ruakura. Withdraw the Ruakura Structure Plan for Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District consultation with the community to occur in order to develop an Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . innovation precinct and residential areas and not a freight and logistics hub. Ross & Leonie 1265.003 3.7 Ruakura Oppose Delete 3.7 Ruakura Structure Plan and consult with community to Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 44 of 63

Hopkins develop an innovation precinct & residential areas. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Russell Vincent FS240.006 Support Cooper Robert Gordon 1268.004 3.7 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7 a)(iii) to move the inland port or increase buffering between Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bell in part the Knowledge Zone and the Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Industrial Park Zone. Robert Gordon 1268.002 Policy 3.3.4c Support Policy 3.3.4c has not been followed in determining the road network in Bell in part Ruakura. Seeks the removal, as set out in the submission, of the through intersection of the Industrial Park street with Silverdale Rd and make it a cul-de-sac with exit through the main entry point at the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District corner of Silverdale and Ruakura Roads (Figure 2-15 Appendix 2: Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plans). Tainui Group FS196.041 Oppose Holdings Limited Kevin Brian Hall 16.001 3.7.1 Structure Support Assurance that no flooding will occur due to Ruakura Structure Plan at Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plan in part the rear of 61A Nevada Rd Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Components Dennis Roy 56.005 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Oppose Concerned at noise levels from trains and other activities associated Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District McLeod Logistics Zone – with an Inland Port. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inland Port Nagarajah 218.001 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7.1.1 to ensure the Greenbelt for the Inland Port is 200m. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Manoharan Logistics Zone – in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inland Port Deborah June 282.003 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the full impacts have been fully Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher Logistics Zone – investigated. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inland Port Josina 289.002 3.7.1.1 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Wilhelmina Logistics Zone – Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Maria Ellis Inland Port Barry Harris 1146.009 3.7.1.10 Water Support Amend 3.7.1.10 b) by replacing the word "sewer" with "wastewater" Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District (Hamilton City and in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Council) Wastewater Deborah June 282.004 3.7.1.2 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the effects on the surrounding Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher Logistics Zone – environments have been fully investigated. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Logistics Waikato 714.018 3.7.1.2 Ruakura Support Retain 3.7.1.2.b Structure Plan component of Ruakura Logistics Zone Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Regional Council Logistics Zone – Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Logistics Deborah June 282.005 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the effects on the surrounding Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher Industrial Park environments have been fully investigated. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone Lance Edward 842.006 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7.1.3 to provide very wide buffer strips between the proposed Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Kendrick Industrial Park in part Industrial areas and existing Residential areas. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone Stephen George 906.004 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Support Supports 3.7.1.3 as it indicates outcomes which enable the creation of The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Bigwood Industrial Park high quality amenity industrial park zone. Zone Robert Gordon 1268.005 3.7.1.3 Ruakura Support Amend 3.7.1.3 to prescribe what high standard amenity entails for the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bell Industrial Park in part Ruakura Industrial park Zone. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone Dennis Roy 56.002 3.7.1.4 Oppose Opposes the concept of an Inland Port. McLeod Knowledge This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Zone Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Future Proof FS181.012 Oppose

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 45 of 63

Implementation Committee Deborah June 282.006 3.7.1.4 Support Retain the Knowledge Zone Fisher Knowledge Zone This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Simon FS67.008 Support Defer Travaglia Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . (Waikato Innovation Park Limited) AgResearch Ltd 609.004 3.7.1.4 Support Amend Rule 3.7.4.1 to remove the inference that the knowledge zone Knowledge in part will compromise the central city. Zone This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Waikato FS72.021 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Regional Council Tainui Group 913.013 3.7.1.4 Oppose Amend 3.7.1.4b by deleting "in a manner that does not compromise the Holdings Ltd Knowledge Central City" Zone Waikato FS72.024 Oppose Regional Council This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer William FS160.001 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Waikato 1051.002 3.7.1.4 Oppose Amend 3.7.1.4b to delete reference to "in a manner that does not Innovation Park Knowledge compromise the Central City" Limited Zone Waikato FS72.027 Oppose This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Regional Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Council Future Proof FS181.005 Oppose Implementation Committee Robert Gordon 1268.007 3.7.1.4 Oppose Amend 3.7.1.4b) to provide justification on how the Inland Port attracts Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bell Knowledge 'world class research and development facilities' or this delete this link Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone AgResearch Ltd 609.005 3.7.1.5 Support Amend Rule 3.7.1.5 to provide for a Suburban Centre rather than a Neighbourhood in part neighbourhood centre. Centre This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Waikato FS72.022 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Regional Council Tainui Group 913.014 3.7.1.5 Oppose Amend 3.7.1.5 to change the Knowledge Zone Neighbourhood Centre Holdings Ltd Neighbourhood to a Suburban Centre. Centre William FS160.001 Oppose This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cornelis Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie -

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 46 of 63

Waikato 1051.004 3.7.1.5 Oppose Amend 3.7.1.5 to relate to a Suburban Centre Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Innovation Park Neighbourhood Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Centre Robert Gordon 1268.008 3.7.1.5 Support Amend 3.7.1.5 to address the need for better connectivity (specifically Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bell Neighbourhood across Ruakura Road) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Centre Alexandra Lee 80.006 3.7.1.6 Oppose Amend Rule 3.7.1.6. Remove Medium Residential Density zoning and Simmons Residential replace with low density residential with the closure of Greenhill Road Zones onto Tramway/Gordonton Roads; and ensure stormwater systems do not utilise local streams as open drains. Tainui Group FS196.039 Oppose This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Holdings Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Chedworth FS197.004 Oppose Properties Limited Gwyneth Ann 293.001 3.7.1.6 Oppose Oppose Rule 3.7.1.6, setting the staging of residential development Verkerk Residential within the Ruakura Structure Plan. A full structure plan should be This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Zones developed. Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Michael John FS21.001 Support Griffin (n/a) AgResearch Ltd 609.006 3.7.1.7 Support Amend 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network to indicate the indicative nature Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Transportation in part of both the spine road & open space corridor. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Network Tainui Group 913.015 3.7.1.7 Support Amend 3.7.1.7 to create flexibility for the alignment of the Holdings Ltd Transportation in part transportation network and open space corridor. Network William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Porter FS239.002 Support This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Developments Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Porter FS241.005 Support Properties Limited Hounsell FS248.004 Support Holdings Limited Hamilton JV FS254.007 Support Investments Limited New Zealand 924.027 3.7.1.7 Support Amend Ruakura structure plan once the location and number of Transport Transportation in part interchanges to the Waikato Expressway are confirmed. Agency Network Future Proof FS181.007 Support This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Implementation Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Committee Wattle Downs FS280.001 Oppose Limited Chedworth 1171.011 3.7.1.7 Support Amend 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network to allow flexibility in the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Transportation in part location of the network and Spine Road with wording amendments and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing .

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 47 of 63

Network subsequent amendments to Figs 2-14 and 2-15. Waikato District 1211.027 3.7.1.7 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Council Transportation in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the Waikato Expressway as Network proposed interchanges and indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Roads are being severed and a new underpass to be undertaken at Percival Road. Designation and road stopping procedures to be undertaken Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing .

Wattle Downs FS280.017 Support Limited Gwyneth Ann 293.006 3.7.1.8 Open Support Amend Rule 3.7.1.8 to include the southern gully areas, cycleways and Verkerk Space Network in part provide opportunity within the transmission corridors for community This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District gardens. Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Michael John FS21.001 Support Griffin (n/a) Laurence John 1094.001 3.7.1.8 Open Oppose Amend 3.7.1.8 by adding a new paragraph to relate to the open space Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Denny Space Network network near Silverdale being a high level of landscaping and screening. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Alexandra Lee 80.003 3.7.1.9 Oppose Amend Rule 3.7.19 to ensure no use of streams for stormwater Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Simmons Stormwater drainage associated with the Ruakura Structure Plan. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Gwyneth Ann FS25.006 Support Verkerk (and Dr Raymond Thomas Cursons) Gwyneth Ann 293.009 3.7.1.9 Support 3.7.1.9 Stormwater - request Council work with landowners to develop Verkerk Stormwater comprehensive plan for gully's ecological amenity. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Michael John FS21.001 Support Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Griffin (n/a) Transpower 1083.009 3.7.1.9 Support Amend 3.7.1.9 to indicate that other land use could adversely affect Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District New Zealand Ltd Stormwater in part transmission lines. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Robert Gordon 1268.009 3.7.1.9 Support Amend 3.7.1.9 to ensure all development and impermeable site Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bell Stormwater in part coverage are subject to Integrated Catchment Management Plan and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . stormwater network design. Deborah June 282.007 3.7.2 Objectives Oppose Amend 3.7.2 by inserting additional objectives and policies to protect Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher and Policies the environment and amenity values of existing residents. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . AgResearch Ltd 609.007 3.7.2 Objectives Support Delete Objective 3.7.2.2 and policy 3.7.2.2(a) and amend objective and Policies in part 3.7.2.4 in relation to the Ruakura Structure Plan and ensure there is no inference it would compromise the Central City. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Waikato FS72.023 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Regional Council Waikato 714.019 3.7.2 Objectives Support Retain Policy 3.7.21b, Amend Policy 3.7.2.1e to include reference to Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Regional Council and Policies in part ecological corridors. Amend objective 3.7.2.3 to include " that is Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . supported by the effective and efficient transport links" Add new policy to 3.7.2.3c to read: "A well functioning and efficient transport network is developed to support logistics and freight handling activities". New Zealand FS270.014 Support Transport Agency Stephen George 906.005 3.7.2 Objectives Support Supports objective 3.7.2.5 and policies 3.7.2.5a and b for the creation of The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Bigwood and Policies high quality industrial park zone.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 48 of 63

Tainui Group 913.016 3.7.2 Objectives Oppose Delete objective 3.7.2.2 and policies 3.7.2.2a, 3.7.2.7a. Amend Holdings Ltd and Policies Objectives and Policies 3.7.2.4, 3.7.2.7 and 3.7.2.7b to remove reference to compromising the Central City, and to replace the Neighbourhood Centre in the Knowledge Zone with a Suburban Centre. Waikato FS72.025 Oppose Regional Council William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Engelander Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Future Proof FS181.01 Oppose Implementation Committee New Zealand FS270.019 Oppose Transport Agency New Zealand 924.028 3.7.2 Objectives Support Amend Policy 3.7.2.1b to "optimise" rather than 'maximise' the use of Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Transport and Policies existing infrastructure. Retain Policy 3.7.2.6a as notified. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Agency ANG & SL 951.008 3.7.2 Objectives Support Amend 3.7.2 to add objective and policies for the Large Lot Residential Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Clarke and Policies in part zone that enable subdivision and development. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Waikato Child 1003.023 3.7.2 Objectives Support Amend Policy 3.7.2.6.c to ensure the aspects of safety is explicitly Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District and Youth and Policies in part incorporated. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Mortality Review Group Waikato 1051.005 3.7.2 Objectives Oppose Amend objectives and policies to provide for in "general" accordance Innovation Park and Policies with the structure plan; Limited Delete Objective 3.7.2.2 and Policy 3.7.2.2a; Amend Objective 3.7.2.4 so as to remove reference to not compromising the Central City;

Amend policy 3.7.2.4a to replace the word ‘shall’ with ‘should’ and This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District reference to the Ruakura Knowledge Zone; Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing .

Amend objective 3.7.2.7 to reference “suburban catchments”, and “goods, service and employment” instead of retail facilities

Delete Policy 3.7.2.7a;

Amend policy 3.7.2.7b to replace neighbourhood centre with suburban centre and the word ‘shall’ with ‘should’. Waikato FS72.029 Oppose Regional Council Future Proof FS181.006 Oppose Implementation Committee New Zealand FS270.023 Oppose Transport Agency Robert Gordon 1268.006 3.7.2 Objectives Support Amend 3.7.2.5a to prescribe what high standard amenity entails for the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bell and Policies in part Ruakura Industrial park Zone. Amend 3.7.2.1c to provide justification on Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . how the Inland Port attracts 'world class research and development

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 49 of 63

facilities' or this delete this link. Amend 3.7.2.6 to be more realistic to the effects of the Inland Port on the residential environment. Stephen George 906.012 3.7.3 Rules Support Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required Bigwood in part development of areas larger than what staging provides for as a non- complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified. Deborah June 282.009 3.7.3.1 Ruakura Oppose Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until further investigation into its Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher Structure Plan impacts on surrounding areas has been conducted. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Area b) Amend Map 2-15 to reflect the correct status of the Spine Road as a major arterial. Tainui Group 913.017 3.7.3.3 Oppose Delete 3.7.3.3 in relation to infrastructure Holdings Ltd Infrastructure William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Heather Montgomerie - New Zealand FS270.02 Oppose Transport Agency Chedworth 1171.012 3.7.3.3 Oppose Delete 3.7.3.3 Infrastructure Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Infrastructure Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . AgResearch Ltd 609.008 3.7.3.4 Staging Support Amend 3.7.3.4 b)i by rewording to require the Waikato Expressway to Rules for in part be completed and connected to the logistics zone or other suitable Ruakura means without compromising the transportation network. Logistics Zone Delete 3.7.3.4 b) ii and Amend 3.7.3.4 b) iii to ensure the management and Ruakura of development between 2021 & 2041 aligns with the RPS. Industrial Park This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Zone in the Defer Ruakura Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan Area New Zealand FS270.01 Oppose Transport Agency Waikato 714.020 3.7.3.4 Staging Support Retain staging rules for the Ruakura Structure Plan 3.7.3.4a to 3.7.3.4c Regional Council Rules for Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Structure Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Area Future Proof FS181.009 Support Implementation Committee New Zealand FS270.015 Support Transport Agency Lance Edward 842.002 3.7.3.4 Staging Support Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a by reducing the 20ha ratio. Amend Rule 3.7.3.4b Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Kendrick Rules for in part stage 2 to reinstate the connections at Greenhill Road and Ruakura Rd. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Ruakura Logistics Zone

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 50 of 63

and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Stephen George 906.016 3.7.3.4 Staging Support Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a) v with the removal of the words "or the industrial The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Bigwood Rules for in part park area immediately north of the knowledge zone (ie west of the Ruakura north-south spine road)" or amend Rule 3.7.3.4a) v by adding a proviso Logistics Zone that the Fifth Avenue, Five Cross Roads and Boundary Road transport and Ruakura Corridor has been upgraded to four lanes prior to development’ Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Hugh and Katie 911.004 3.7.3.4 Staging Oppose Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) and undertake a plan variation once NZTA has Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Goodman and Rules for made a decision on the location and style of interchange on the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Mayes Ruakura Waikato Expressway. Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) relating to release of 80ha of Logistics Zone land in Ruakura prior to 2021. and Ruakura Retain Rule 3.7.3.4 b) which supports the release of land post 2021 on Industrial Park completion of the Hamilton Waikato Expressway. Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Tainui Group 913.018 3.7.3.4 Staging Support Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a to provide flexibility in relation to the Waikato Holdings Ltd Rules for in part Regional Policy Statement. Delete 3.7.3.4(a)(ii) to (iv). Amend Rule Ruakura 3.7.3.4b amend to provide flexibility for development in relation to the Logistics Zone completion of the Waikato Expressway. and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Waikato FS72.026 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Regional Council William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Susan Hopkins 1264.004 3.7.3.4 Staging Oppose Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) and undertake a plan variation once NZTA has Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Rules for made a decision on the location and style of interchange on the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Ruakura Waikato Expressway. Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) relating to release of 80ha of Logistics Zone land in Ruakura prior to 2021. and Ruakura Retain Rule 3.7.3.4 b) which supports the release of land post 2021 on Industrial Park completion of the Hamilton Waikato Expressway. Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Ross & Leonie 1265.004 3.7.3.4 Staging Oppose Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) and undertake a plan variation once NZTA has Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Hopkins Rules for made a decision on the location and style of interchange on the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Ruakura Waikato Expressway. Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) relating to release of 80ha of Logistics Zone land in Ruakura prior to 2021.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 51 of 63

and Ruakura Retain Rule 3.7.3.4 b) which supports the release of land post 2021 on Industrial Park completion of the Hamilton Waikato Expressway. Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Russell Vincent FS240.006 Support Cooper Brett Hopkins 1266.004 3.7.3.4 Staging Oppose Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) and undertake a plan variation once NZTA has Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District (Ruakura Rules for made a decision on the location and style of interchange on the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Motors Ruakura Waikato Expressway. Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) relating to release of 80ha of Tractorparts Ltd) Logistics Zone land in Ruakura prior to 2021. and Ruakura Industrial Park Retain Rule 3.7.3.4 b) which supports the release of land post 2021 on Zone in the completion of the Hamilton Waikato Expressway. Ruakura Structure Plan Area Robert Gordon 1268.003 3.7.3.4 Staging Support Amend Rule 3.7.3.4 b)(ii) and Fig 2-15 to remove the through Bell Rules for in part intersection of the Industrial Park street with Silverdale Rd and make it Ruakura a cul-de-sac with exit through the main entry point at the corner of Logistics Zone Silverdale and Ruakura Roads. and Ruakura This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Industrial Park Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Simon FS67.01 Oppose Travaglia (Waikato Innovation Park Limited) Gwyneth Ann 293.007 3.7.3.5 Staging Oppose Review staging rules 3.7.3.5 for the large lot residential zone within the Verkerk Rules for Ruakura Structure Plan General Residential Zone and Medium Density This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Residential Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Michael John FS21.001 Support Griffin (n/a) Tainui Group 913.019 3.7.3.5 Staging Oppose Delete Rules 3.7.3.5(a) and 3.7.3.5(b) and replace with amended Holdings Ltd Rules for wording to align with the recent decision on the E1 to Cobham Drive, or General impacts of the location of connections to the Waikato Expressway. Residential Zone and Medium This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Density Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Residential Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 52 of 63

William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - New Zealand FS270.021 Oppose Transport Agency ANG & SL 951.009 3.7.3.5 Staging Oppose Amend Rule 3.7.3.5 to enable the immediate release of residential Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Clarke Rules for zoned land in the Ruakura Structure Plan areas. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . General Residential Zone and Medium Density Residential Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area Chedworth 1171.013 3.7.3.5 Staging Oppose Amend Rules 3.7.3.5a) and b) so that development of the Spine Rd is Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Rules for not required as part of the residential development. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . General Residential Zone and Medium Density Residential Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area AgResearch Ltd 609.003 3.7.3.6 Staging Oppose Delete staging rule for the Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Rule for the Zone 3.7.3.6 and 3.7(h) Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Area Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Simon FS67.007 Oppose Travaglia (Waikato Innovation Park Limited) Tainui Group FS196.02 Support Holdings Limited Tainui Group 913.020 3.7.3.6 Staging Oppose Delete Rule 3.7.3.6 Staging rule for Innovation Park Precinct for the Holdings Ltd Rule for the Knowledge Zone. Innovation Park Precinct of the This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Knowledge Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 53 of 63

William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - New Zealand FS270.022 Oppose Transport Agency Waikato 1051.003 3.7.3.6 Staging Oppose Amend staging rules in 3.7.3.6 to enable earlier development of the Innovation Park Rule for the suburban centre. Limited Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone in the This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Ruakura Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan Area Waikato FS72.028 Oppose Regional Council Tainui Group FS196.025 Support Holdings Limited Deborah June 282.010 3.7.4 Provisions Support Delete Discretionary Assessment Criteria A2 - general criteria. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Fisher in Other in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Chapters Gavin Smith 224.001 Appendix 2 Oppose That Lot: 1 DP: S68406 at Te Rapa East Road be included within Stage 1 Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Structure Plans of the Rotokauri Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Gaenor Smith 229.001 Appendix 2 Support Retain figures 2-8 in Appendix 2 (Structure Plans - Rotokauri) in so far as Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Structure Plans it identifies an industrial land use for Lot 1: DP: S68406 (Te Kowhai East Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Road). Deborah June 282.002 Appendix 2 Oppose Remove Ruakura SP until more details are available, an environmental Fisher Structure Plans impact report available and the full and future effects on the surrounding environment have been considered. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District The Church of FS180.002 Oppose Defer Jesus Christ of Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Latter Day Saints Trust Board W.J. & M.R. 313.002 Appendix 2 Support Include a Structure Plan for Temple View within Appendix 2 - Structure Laverty Structure Plans in part Plans.

The Church of FS180.088 Support This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Jesus Christ of Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Latter Day Saints Trust Board W.R & J.M 360.003 Appendix 2 Support Amend Volume 2: Appendix 2 - Structure Plans by including a Temple Falconer Structure Plans in part View Structure Plan and make any subsequential changes to other diagrams. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District The Church of FS180.089 Support Defer Jesus Christ of Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Latter Day Saints Trust Board Wei Lee 763.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 54 of 63

Structure Plans reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan Ming-San 764.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District (Arvin) & Meng- Structure Plans buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone c) Council purchase the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Chu (Anna) properties Tang Ken & Hong 827.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Shang & Wang Structure Plans subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Roads Kung-Yao Lin 831.005 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Structure Plans rights including subdivision that exist for the area. b) Provide a 100m Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the low density residential lifestyle and quality. Derrick Ross & 835.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Robyn Mary Structure Plans reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Marsters Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan. Allan Liang-chitz 861.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District & Shirley Tzu- Structure Plans subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . ling Wan Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future. Raylene & Saul 864.005 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cowie & Spriggs Structure Plans subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted buffer and bund Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the property. Bryce & Natasha 910.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Carmichael Structure Plans rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot residential and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road f) purchase property. William Roy 928.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cowie Structure Plans earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning and retain a large Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2. Deanna - Rose 979.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Alexander Structure Plans permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary; or purchase Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . property. Bee Chiew Phee 1004.005 Appendix 2 Oppose Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Structure Plans residential zoning and allow subdivision to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties from Percival/Ryburn Roads. Alan Frederick & 1005.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Barbara Structure Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Winifred Julian Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 55 of 63

Peter & Barbara 1006.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Ryan Structure Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area. Bo & Meggie 1007.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Han & Wang Structure Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road. Shing-long Lee 1224.006 Appendix 2 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Structure Plans development rights without reference to any logistics in the future. b) Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted earth bund. c) Ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road. d) Provide development rights same as provided for in the large lot residential zone for the southern end of the structure plan. Dennis Roy 56.003 Figure 2-14 Oppose Insufficient green belt identified adjoining dwellings on the Ruakura Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District McLeod Ruakura Structure Plan - landuse plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Land Use Graeme Ernest 180.001 Figure 2-14 Oppose Requests Ruakura industrial and logistics zone and Inland Port be Goodwin Ruakura rezoned to knowledge and rural residential zones or residential Goodwin Structure Plan- Land Use Simon FS67.015 Oppose Travaglia This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer (Waikato Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Innovation Park Limited) Future Proof FS181.029 Oppose Implementation Committee Pearce Andrew 215.005 Figure 2-14 Oppose Requests assurance that adverse effects will be avoided, remedied and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Watson Ruakura mitigated from the Ruakura Industrial Park. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . (Wizardsleeve Structure Plan- Holdings Land Use Limited) Jennifer Rita 338.002 Figure 2-14 Support Relocate residential and commercial areas within the Ruakura Structure Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Bothwell Ruakura in part Plan to avoid industrial views and noise for existing homes. Retain Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . ( Structure Plan- natural stormwater drainage. Residents) Land Use Future Proof 608.035 Figure 2-14 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Implementation Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the Waikato Expressway and Committee Structure Plan- indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Roads are being severed and Land Use a new underpass to be undertaken at Percival Road. Designation and road stopping procedures to be undertaken. Ruakura FS167.006 Oppose Residents Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Group and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . William Roy Cowie Russell Vincent FS240.002 Oppose Cooper New Zealand FS270.082 Support Transport

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 56 of 63

Agency Wattle Downs FS280.003 Oppose Limited AgResearch Ltd 609.024 Figure 2-14 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - retain interchanges at Greenhill Road and Ruakura in part Ruakura Road and delete all other options; delete "Transport Corridors" Structure Plan- within Ruakura Research Centre. Land Use Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District New Zealand FS270.083 Support Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Transport Agency Wattle Downs FS280.004 Oppose Limited Waikato 714.092 Figure 2-14 Support Ruakura Structure Plan- Retain possible interchanges until certainty is Regional Council Ruakura in part provided on the locations. Structure Plan- This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Land Use Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Wattle Downs FS280.011 Oppose Limited Waikato-Tainui 771.025 Figure 2-14 Support Ruakura Structure Plan identifies the Greenhill and Ruakura connections Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Te Kauhanganui Ruakura in part as “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inc Structure Plan- Land Use WEL Networks 822.031 Figure 2-14 Support Amend Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use to provide for a network Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Limited Ruakura in part utilities corridor from Silverdale Road to the Waikato Expressway Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- designation; request provisions to enable network utility connections to Land Use transportation networks. Stephen George 906.001 Figure 2-14 Support Ruakura Structure Plan amend connections to be consistent with The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Bigwood Ruakura in part designations; include staging on the map from staging rules; include Structure Plan- 20m reserve along Wairere Dr. Land Use AgResearch FS244.009 Oppose Limited Wattle Downs FS280.012 Oppose Limited Tainui Group 913.098 Figure 2-14 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Holdings Ltd Ruakura in part Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove Structure Plan- 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Land Use William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Montgomerie - Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Future Proof FS181.028 Support Implementation Committee Jennifer West FS271.013 Oppose

Wattle Downs FS280.006 Oppose Limited New Zealand 924.205 Figure 2-14 Support Amend Figure 2-14 upon identification of the preferred location and Transport Ruakura in part number of connections to the Waikato Expressway. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Agency Structure Plan- Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Land Use

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 57 of 63

Wattle Downs FS280.002 Oppose Limited ANG & SL 951.004 Figure 2-14 Support Retain the Large Lot Residential Zone. Delete the Open Space notation Accept in It is accepted that the Large Lot Residential Zone be retained. The matter in relation to the extent of the Natural Open Space Zone be Clarke Ruakura in part relating to the secondary stormwater flow path in relation to Lot 3 DP part deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Plan which is Structure Plan- 379687. anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing. Land Use Waikato 1051.020 Figure 2-14 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan -Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 to identify Local Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Innovation Park Ruakura Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- internal accessways and re-align. Land Use Transpower 1083.004 Figure 2-14 Support Ruakura Structure Plan – Retain Figure 2-14 Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District New Zealand Ltd Ruakura Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Land Use Laurence John 1094.002 Figure 2-14 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - add to 3.7.1.8 Open Space Network a new Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Denny Ruakura clause to recognise a high level of landscaping and screening. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Land Use Chedworth 1171.050 Figure 2-14 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Properties Ltd Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Structure Plan- Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Land Use This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Gwyneth Ann FS25.002 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Verkerk (and Dr Raymond Thomas Cursons) Wattle Downs FS280.009 Oppose Limited Waikato District 1211.028 Figure 2-14 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Council Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the Waikato Expressway as Structure Plan- proposed interchanges and indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Defer Land Use Roads are being severed and a new underpass to be undertaken at This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Percival Road. Designation and road stopping procedures to be Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . undertaken. Wattle Downs FS280.018 Support

Limited Kerry & Donna 1257.005 Figure 2-14 Oppose Opposes the Ruakura Industrial zone. Either purchase the property or Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Willmott Ruakura amend the plan to allow semi-commercial use on 63 Ryburn Road Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Land Use Ruakura 1275.004 Figure 2-14 Oppose Amend Ruakura Structure Plan Figure 2-14 to identify land as Large Lot Residents Group Ruakura residential; remove reference to transitional use of land as large lot and William Roy Structure Plan- residential and future use as Ruakura Logistics; if unacceptable rezone This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cowie Land Use 100m buffer as Open Space. Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Future Proof FS181.03 Oppose Implementation Committee David Evan & 1278.006 Figure 2-14 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) retain the existing Rural Residential zoning and Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Karlene Chibnall Ruakura associated development rights. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Percival and Ryburn Roads with a planted earth bund. c) ensure Land Use continuing vehicle access for commuting; and ensure fair treatment over privately owned land. Roland & 1279.006 Figure 2-14 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning with the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Wendy Spirig Ruakura addition of a 100m planted buffer. b) restrict the operating hours of the Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- port to daylight hours and provide for a way to lodge noise complaints.

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 58 of 63

Land Use David Murray 1280.006 Figure 2-14 Oppose Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the existing Rural Residential Zoning with Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District and Karen Lee Ruakura associated development rights. b) Provide a 100m buffer around Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Young Structure Plan- Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted earth bund. c) Land Use Remove the deferred logistics zoning from the proposed plan. Dennis Roy 56.004 Figure 2-15 Oppose Identification of a greenbelt for the mitigation of noise and lighting on Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District McLeod Ruakura the Ruakura Structure Plan - Transport Network Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Transport Network AgResearch Ltd 609.025 Figure 2-15 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2-15 Delete the “Possible Passenger Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Ruakura Transport Route” and delete the "Local Transport Corridor Roads" Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- within AgResearch Centre. Transport Network Waikato-Tainui 771.026 Figure 2-15 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Te Kauhanganui Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Inc Structure Plan- Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26. Transport Network This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Gwyneth Ann FS25.004 Oppose Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Verkerk (and Dr Raymond Thomas Cursons) Stephen George 906.007 Figure 2-15 Support Ruakura Structure Plan Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend connections to be Bigwood Ruakura in part consistent with designations; Structure Plan- Transport The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Network Wattle Downs FS280.013 Oppose Limited Tainui Group 913.099 Figure 2-15 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Holdings Ltd Ruakura in part Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove Structure Plan- 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Transport Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Network William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Engelander Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Jennifer West FS271.014 Oppose

Wattle Downs FS280.007 Oppose Limited Parkwood 977.030 Figure 2-15 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2-15 amend to delete the Major Arterial Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Gateway Ruakura Transport Corridor and Arterial Corridor Protection Area from land Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- located outside of the Structure Plan Area. Transport Network Portland Park 984.028 Figure 2-15 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.15 amend to delete the Major Arterial Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Limited Ruakura Transport Corridor and Arterial Corridor Protection Area from land Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- located outside of the Structure Plan Area. Transport

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 59 of 63

Network Waikato 1051.021 Figure 2-15 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend by identifying the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Innovation Park Ruakura Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- internal accessways and re-align Local Transport Corridors; delete Transport cycleways/walkways shown on Figure 2-15 within Waikato Innovation Network Park. Chedworth 1171.051 Figure 2-15 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Properties Ltd Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Structure Plan- Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Transport Defer Network Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Wattle Downs FS280.01 Oppose Limited Waikato District 1211.029 Figure 2-15 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Council Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the Waikato Expressway as Structure Plan- proposed interchanges and indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Transport Roads are being severed and a new underpass to be undertaken at This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Defer Network Percival Road. Designation and road stopping procedures to be Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . undertaken Wattle Downs FS280.019 Support Limited AgResearch Ltd 609.026 Figure 2-16 Oppose Delete the Transport Corridors within the AgResearch Centre on the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Ruakura Ruakura Structure Plan Fig 2-16 Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Water Infrastructure Waikato-Tainui 771.027 Figure 2-16 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Te Kauhanganui Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inc Structure Plan- Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26. Water Infrastructure Stephen George 906.008 Figure 2-16 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figs 2-14 to 2-18 to remove possible Bigwood Ruakura in part interchanges which are inconsistent with designations. Structure Plan- Water The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Infrastructure Wattle Downs FS280.014 Oppose Limited Tainui Group 913.100 Figure 2-16 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Holdings Ltd Ruakura in part Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove Structure Plan- 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Water Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Infrastructure William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Heather Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Montgomerie - New Zealand FS270.085 Support Transport Agency Jennifer West FS271.015 Oppose

Wattle Downs FS280.008 Oppose Limited

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 60 of 63

Parkwood 977.031 Figure 2-16 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.16 amend to delete Stage 1 interim Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Gateway Ruakura water connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- Plan Area, or alternatively that it be made clear that this notation does Water not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Infrastructure Portland Park 984.029 Figure 2-16 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.16 amend to delete Stage 1 interim Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Limited Ruakura water connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Plan Area, or alternatively that it be made clear that this notation does Water not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645. Infrastructure Waikato 1051.022 Figure 2-16 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend by identifying the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Innovation Park Ruakura Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- internal accessways and re-align Local Transport Corridors. Water Infrastructure Chedworth 1171.052 Figure 2-16 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - Supports infrastructure and staging in Figures Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Ruakura in part 2.15 – 2-19. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Water Infrastructure Waikato District 1211.030 Figure 2-16 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - supports figs 2-15 to 2-19 in relation to the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Council Ruakura in part infrastructure and staging. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Water Infrastructure AgResearch Ltd 609.027 Figure 2-17 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan Fig 2-17 - Delete the Transport Corridors within Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Ruakura the AgResearch Centre. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Waste Water Infrastructure Waikato-Tainui 771.028 Figure 2-17 Support Ruakura Structure Plan - supports the infrastructure and staging in Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Te Kauhanganui Ruakura in part Figures 2.15 – 2-19. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inc Structure Plan- Waste Water Infrastructure Stephen George 906.009 Figure 2-17 Support Ruakura Structure Plan -amend Figs 2-14 to 2-18 to remove interchange Bigwood Ruakura in part connections inconsistent with designations. Structure Plan- Waste Water Infrastructure The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Future Proof FS181.031 Oppose Implementation Committee Wattle Downs FS280.015 Oppose Limited Tainui Group 913.101 Figure 2-17 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Holdings Ltd Ruakura in part Structure Plan- Waste Water Infrastructure This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District William FS160.001 Oppose Defer Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Cornelis Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Parkwood 977.032 Figure 2-17 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Fig 2-17 delete the Stage 1 interim wastewater Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 61 of 63

Gateway Ruakura connection points A & B from land located outside the Structure Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- Area, or make it clear these do not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP Waste Water 444645. Infrastructure Portland Park 984.030 Figure 2-17 Oppose Ruakura Structure Plan - Fig 2-17 delete the Stage 1 interim wastewater Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Limited Ruakura connection points A & B from land located outside the Structure Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Area, or make it clear these do not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP Waste Water 444645. Infrastructure Waikato 1051.023 Figure 2-17 Oppose Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 by identifying the Local Transport Corridors Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Innovation Park Ruakura within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- re-alignment of the Local Transport Corridors. Waste Water Infrastructure Chedworth 1171.053 Figure 2-17 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 infrastructure and staging. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Ruakura in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Waste Water Infrastructure Waikato District 1211.031 Figure 2-17 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 infrastructure and staging. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Council Ruakura in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Waste Water Infrastructure AgResearch Ltd 609.028 Figure 2-18 Oppose Figure 2-18: delete the “Transport Corridors” located within the Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Ruakura Ruakura Research Centre. Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Storm Water Infrastructure Waikato-Tainui 771.029 Figure 2-18 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Te Kauhanganui Ruakura in part connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State Inc Structure Plan- highway 26. This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Storm Water Defer Infrastructure Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Wattle Downs FS280.005 Oppose Limited Stephen George 906.010 Figure 2-18 Support Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 to remove the possible interchange Bigwood Ruakura in part connections to the Waikato Expressway which are inconsistent with the Structure Plan- Waikato Expressway Designation. Storm Water Infrastructure Future Proof FS181.032 Oppose Implementation The original submission has been withdrawn therefore no decision is required. Committee New Zealand FS270.084 Oppose Transport Agency Wattle Downs FS280.016 Oppose Limited Tainui Group 913.102 Figure 2-18 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Holdings Ltd Ruakura in part Structure Plan- Storm Water Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Infrastructure Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . William FS160.001 Oppose Cornelis Engelander

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 62 of 63

James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Parkwood 977.033 Figure 2-18 Oppose Figure 2.18 be amended to delete Stage 1 interim stormwater Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Gateway Ruakura connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- Area, or it be made clear this does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP Storm Water 444645. Infrastructure Portland Park 984.031 Figure 2-18 Oppose Figure 2.18 be amended to delete Stage 1 interim stormwater Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Limited Ruakura connection point A from land located outside of the Structure Plan Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- Area, or it be made clear this does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP Storm Water 444645. Infrastructure Waikato 1051.024 Figure 2-18 Oppose Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 by identifying the Local Transport Corridors Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Innovation Park Ruakura within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Limited Structure Plan- re-alignment of the Local Transport Corridors. Storm Water Infrastructure Chedworth 1171.054 Figure 2-18 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Ruakura in part connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- highway 26. Storm Water Infrastructure Waikato District 1211.032 Figure 2-18 Support Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Council Ruakura in part Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the Waikato Expressway and Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Structure Plan- indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Roads are being severed and Storm Water a new underpass to be undertaken at Percival Road. Designation and Infrastructure road stopping procedures to be undertaken. Wattle Downs FS280.02 Support Limited Waikato-Tainui 771.030 Figure 2-19 Support Supports Figures 2-15 - 2-19 for infrastructure and staging. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Te Kauhanganui Ruakura in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Inc Residential Staging Tainui Group 913.103 Figure 2-19 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging. Holdings Ltd Ruakura in part Residential Staging William FS160.001 Oppose Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Cornelis Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Engelander James Hely and FS161.001 Oppose Heather Montgomerie - Chedworth 1171.055 Figure 2-19 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 infrastructure and staging. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Properties Ltd Ruakura in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Residential Staging Waikato District 1211.033 Figure 2-19 Support Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 infrastructure and staging. Defer This matter is deferred until the Board of Inquiry issues a decision on the Plan Change Application for Ruakura to the Operative District Council Ruakura in part Plan which is anticipated in September this year and these matters will be heard by the Commissioners at a reconvened hearing . Residential Staging

Decisions Report – Chapter 3 Structure Plans, 9 July 2014 Page 63 of 63